Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

DIRECT FROM THE SOURCE | During a press briefing at Camp Aguinaldo, AFP spokesperson Col. Francel Margareth Padilla PA clarified that the recent activity at the PHIVIDEC Industrial Estate was a site survey, not a site takeover. Rear Adm. Roy Vincent Trinidad PN (Ret) (Res) also urged the public...

13,014 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Today's inquest into the murder of Rex Masai marks my 300th court appearance in solidarity with victims of illegal arrests and sociopolitical injustices since the June 2024 protests. In today's session, the Investigating officer has confirmed that the officer, Isaiah Murangiri Nduba, who was captured along Uhuru highway with a blue jeans, was the same officer captured carrying a small gun and a baton at the scene where Rex Masai was shot. The IO also states that Mr Isaiah Murangiri, according to arms movement register, was issued with a teargas launcher and on the camera, the same officer is seen in possession of a baton and a small pistol. We would also like to inform Kenyans that the arms movement register was revealed to have been altered during the 22nd July 2025 hearing. The IO has also stated before the court that Isaiah's statement had three numbers, two registered under his name and one registered under Michael Oginga Okello. Stating also that Isaiah decided to mislead the investigations by giving misleading information. The IO reveals that Safaricom data, under one of the numbers registered under Murangiri, revealed that Isaiah was not stationed at KICC as he had revealed in his statement. The data shows that he was at Development House, Wakulima House, New Keraita building, Kariako area and St Ellis along Wabera street. He also says that Wabera street is where one of the witnesses identified as Fredrick, spotted the officer chasing after other demonstrators. A ballistic report shows that the cartridge that was picked at the International house was 5.56 by 45mm calibre, ammunition fired from a rifle and could not be linked to the two identified pistols issued for forensic analysis. The IO says that the OCS in his statement, stated that he never deployed officers in civilian to handle protests. That begs the question, how did an undercover officer appear in public with a launcher? He has concluded by saying that they were unable to get the firearm from which the bullet that injured Rex Masai came from. #JusticeForRexMasai

I am Chege

18,073 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Statement of the National Task Force-West Philippine Sea This morning, China Coast Guard (CCG) and Chinese Maritime Militia (CMM) vessels harassed, blocked, deployed water cannons, and executed dangerous maneuvers in another attempt to illegally impede or obstruct a routine resupply and rotation mission to BRP SIERRA MADRE (LS 57) at Ayungin Shoal. At approximately 0632H CCG vessel 21555 executed dangerous blocking maneuvers against Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) vessel MRRV 4407, which caused a minor collision resulting in superficial structural damage to the hull of the PCG vessel. At 0815H, one CCG vessel caused a minor collision with Unaizah May 4 (UM4) due to its dangerous blocking maneuvers. CCG vessels 21555 and 21551 deployed water cannons simultaneously against the supply boat UM4. The use of water cannons by the CCG vessels shattered the wind shield of UM4, causing minor injuries to at least four (4) personnel on board. At 0936H, the injured personnel were treated by Philippine Coast Guard personnel from MRRV. Due to the damage and injuries to the vessel and crew, UM4 proceeded back to mainland Palawan under escort of MRRV 4407. At 0930H, Unaizah May 1 (UM1) successfully docked with LS57 and began its resupply. It concluded its resupply and departed BRP SIERRA MADRE at 1054H. Once again, China's latest unprovoked acts of coercion and dangerous maneuvers against a legitimate and routine Philippine rotation and resupply mission to Ayungin Shoal, have put the lives of our people at risk and caused actual injury to Filipinos on board UM4. The systematic and consistent manner in which the People's Republic of China carries out these illegal and irresponsible actions puts into question the sincerity of its calls for peaceful dialogue and lessening of tensions. The Philippines, for its part, continues to act peacefully and responsibly, consistent with international law, particularly UNCLOS and the legally binding 2016 Arbitral Award. Peace and stability cannot be achieved without due regard for the legitimate, well-established, and legally settled rights of others. The Philippines will not be deterred from exercising our legal rights over our maritime zones, including Ayungin Shoal which forms part of our Exclusive Economic Zone and continental shelf. We demand that China demonstrate that it is a responsible and trustworthy member of the international community.

Jay Tarriela

324,693 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨#BreakingNews: Wilson’s Web of “Unawareness”: Mayor Contradicts Herself on Why Public Was Left in the Dark After Shooting “Miscommunication” and “I am not aware” says Seattle mayor when pressed again of public information delays of shooting. Wilson provides contradicting remarks to what she knew Sunday night. During Friday’s (July 31st) presser Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson when asked if she is telling the truth on whether her office told SPD to delay Sunday evening’s presser to wait for “dignitaries,” Wilson shared that she “learned at 9.40 p.m., five minutes before 9.45 p.m. [presser], that a press conference was being planned at Seattle Center” and that if she “had known that next to no information” other than her “own office's blog post” earlier that evening “had been shared with the public since the time of the incident at 6 p.m., I would have immediately said, yes, tell the press everything you know.” Then minutes later when responding to a reporter’s question on how can she not know that information about the shooting was not being communicated to the public on Sunday night, Mayor Wilson responded, “The reason why we put out a statement on our website around 8.45 p.m. is because at that point we did realize that nothing was getting out there.” Mayor Wilson appears to have contradicted herself on what she knew when on Sunday night about the lack of public information being shared on the Bite of Seattle shooting. Earlier she said to one reporter that she found out at 9:40 p.m. that “next to no information” was shared to the public about the shooting yet minutes later she admitted that her office posted at 8:45 p.m. about the shooting because “at that point we did realize that nothing was getting out there” and that the “the public was desperate for information.” Therefore, by no later than 8:45 p.m., Mayor Wilson was aware that little to no information was being shared to the public and that she was the arbiter of that information. Mayor Wilson also mentioned that at 9:40 p.m., five minutes before the scheduled 9:45 p.m. presser that “I personally at 9:40 p.m. was not aware that basic information such as the status of Seattle Center campus and information about potential suspects at large had not gotten out in any form.” This coupled with the fact that she said that also at 9:40 p.m., she was unaware of the 9:45 p.m. scheduled presser, may reasonably indicate that she needed more time to be brought up to speed on the situation. Yet, Mayor Wilson continues to deny she delayed the dissemination of information to the public regarding the shooting on Sunday night. The delay in the Sunday presser for “dignitaries” was said by a SPD spokesperson and also captured on video. Later in Friday’s presser Mayor Wilson was asked that during Monday’s presser how could she not know that the 19-year-old who died at Seattle Center was actually part of the shooting when the King County Prosecutor's Office court documents stated the 19-y/o’s involvement which were released shortly after the presser, inferring that the prosecutor’s office knew hours earlier before Monday’s presser. Mayor Wilson again responded, “I was not aware of that information at that time.” Also, during the presser Mayor Wilson said that the public information “should have been shared earlier. It could have been shared in a number of forms. Social media, the SPD blotter, our emergency alert system, potentially an off-site press conference.” During Monday’s presser mayor was again “unaware” of the City’s emergency alert system. 🟥Below is Q&A from Friday’s presser surrounding the Sunday Presser delay and delay of public information: 👉Reporter: You have command staff who was there. Many of them are here tonight. Again, we're hearing that your office told them to hold off immediate briefings. Are you telling the truth? when it comes to that night about your office telling them to hold off? Wilson: I learned at 9.40 p.m., five minutes before 9.45, that a press conference was being planned at Seattle Center. At that time, if I had known that next to no information, apart from my own office's blog post, had been shared with the public since the time of the incident at 6 p.m., I would have immediately said, yes, tell the press everything you know. Yeah, in that, absolutely no direction for my office not to share information. Nope. 👉Reporter: How did you not know? Did you not turn on the TV? Did you not look at half of your phone? Wilson: I was not watching the TV that evening. 👉Reporter: Did no one in your administration know that no information was going out to the public about a mass shooting? Wilson: “The reason why we put out a statement on our website around 8.45 p.m. is because at that point we did realize that nothing was getting out there, and we knew that the public was desperate for information. So we put out a statement with the best information we had at that time from SPD, which, as everyone knows, included some misinformation about the number of suspects who had been taken into custody. “Communications were flying around and I personally at 940 was not aware that basic information such as the status of Seattle Center campus and information about potential suspects at large had not gotten out in any form. “And that information should have been shared earlier. It could have been shared in a number of forms. Social media, the SPD blotter, our emergency alert system, potentially an off-site press conference.”

Lynnwood Times

41,913 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

SANJIV BHATT: WHEN LAW, POWER, AND PUBLIC TRUST COLLIDE The accompanying material presents the second part of the story surrounding former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, focusing on allegations linked to the 2002 Gujarat riots, the custodial death case from 1990, and the sharply contrasting narratives that continue to divide public opinion. According to the source, Bhatt claimed that he possessed information relating to the alleged killers of former Gujarat minister Haren Pandya and that he faced pressure to destroy evidence. He also alleged that he repeatedly warned authorities about the deteriorating situation during the 2002 Gujarat riots, including the danger faced by people at Gulberg Society. These allegations were later placed before investigative agencies and judicial forums. The video also notes that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) did not find sufficient evidence to support these allegations and gave a clean chit to the then Chief Minister, a conclusion later accepted by the Supreme Court. These findings remain an important part of the legal record, even as critics continue to question aspects of the investigation. The second major issue concerns the 1990 custodial death of Prabhudas Vaishnani. The source states that the case was initially closed after investigation but was reopened years later. In 2019, a trial court convicted Bhatt and sentenced him to life imprisonment, a conviction that was upheld by the Gujarat High Court in 2024, while the Supreme Court declined to grant relief. The courts relied on witness testimony and medical evidence in reaching their conclusions. The video also describes Bhatt's tenure as Superintendent of Sabarmati Central Jail, claiming that he introduced reforms that improved prison conditions and earned the respect of many inmates. The source presents this as evidence of the complexity of his public image. Ultimately, the story portrays two competing narratives. One views Sanjiv Bhatt as an honest police officer who suffered for challenging those in power. The other holds that the judicial process established his criminal liability in the custodial death case and that court verdicts must be respected. Whatever one's perspective, the case underscores the importance of independent investigations, judicial transparency, accountability of public officials, and public confidence in the rule of law. In a constitutional democracy, both the pursuit of truth and respect for due process are essential. Where questions remain, they should be addressed through credible evidence, transparent institutions, and impartial justice—not through political loyalty or public emotion alone. Source: Facebook Video:

Ashok Dadhwal

33,015 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce