Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Disgusting Comment by Jagan! Talking about Sensitive issues like Dealth. When will our Politicians Learn? "పొరపాటున చంద్రబాబు గారు నిద్రలో ఉన్నప్పుడు ఎవరైనా 'MAVIGUN' అంటే గుండె ఆగి చనిపోతాడు." #YSJagan

Journalist Nishant

11,113 subscribers

346,183 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics #YSJagan

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

చంద్రబాబు గురించి జగన్ : పొరపాటున ఎవరైనా చంద్రబాబు గారికి నిద్ర లో MAVIGUN అని అంటే బహుశా గుండె ఆగి చనిపోయినా చనిపోతాడు.

చంద్రబాబు గురించి జగన్ : పొరపాటున ఎవరైనా చంద్రబాబు గారికి నిద్ర లో MAVIGUN అని అంటే బహుశా గుండె ఆగి చనిపోయినా చనిపోతాడు.

H A N U

38,156 views • 2 months ago

“The government will introduce legislation which will shield intelligence officials and politicians giving evidence to the Bondi Royal Commission. “This could include protecting intelligence officers, who may give evidence in camera, when they reveal information normally banned by security laws,” he said. “It will also include protecting politicians should they be asked about deliberations of the National Security Committee of the Cabinet or other discussions. “My understanding is the Royal Commissioner, Virginia Bell, has asked for these protections.” ••••••••••••••••• I fail to see what information regarding the Bondi shooters is so sensitive that it can’t be disclosed. The Australian public have a right to know why the Intelligence agencies failed to prevent the shootings at Bondi. There needs to be much greater scrutiny of our intelligence agencies. They are extremely powerful and should be held to account like every other government department is. They have a track record of avoiding scrutiny particularly around COVID and weapons of mass destruction. People First is the only party who wants to hold these agencies to account. Please support us at

“The government will introduce legislation which will shield intelligence officials and politicians giving evidence to the Bondi Royal Commission. “This could include protecting intelligence officers, who may give evidence in camera, when they reveal information normally banned by security laws,” he said. “It will also include protecting politicians should they be asked about deliberations of the National Security Committee of the Cabinet or other discussions. “My understanding is the Royal Commissioner, Virginia Bell, has asked for these protections.” ••••••••••••••••• I fail to see what information regarding the Bondi shooters is so sensitive that it can’t be disclosed. The Australian public have a right to know why the Intelligence agencies failed to prevent the shootings at Bondi. There needs to be much greater scrutiny of our intelligence agencies. They are extremely powerful and should be held to account like every other government department is. They have a track record of avoiding scrutiny particularly around COVID and weapons of mass destruction. People First is the only party who wants to hold these agencies to account. Please support us at

Gerard Rennick

14,868 views • 4 months ago

I’m a Christian visiting Israel, and here is what I’ve learned: Far too many people have confused their empathy for Palestinians with hatred towards Jews. As I walked around these sites that were destroyed on October 7th, places where both Jews and non-Jews were murdered by Hamas, I kept thinking with frustration, “I know what my comment section will look like if I talk about this.” Because, let’s be honest, there is an obvious double standard when it comes to talking about antisemitism and Jewish suffering generally. Since I’ve been here, my comment section has been flooded with hundreds of people telling me that if I travel to Israel as a Christian, if I embrace my Christianity here, that I will be spat on and harassed by the Jewish community in Israel. Well, I’m here to say that that couldn’t be farther from the truth. I’ve been to Israel many times, and I can say that the closest I came to harassment on this trip was when my Jewish host family kept feeding me challah and I almost fell into a carb induced coma. The love I’ve received, from being recognized by a girl in seminary to our hostess becoming my adopted Jewish mother, my time in Israel is consistently marked by the amazing people I interact with here 🤍 Am yisrael chai. Be back soon 🤍

I’m a Christian visiting Israel, and here is what I’ve learned: Far too many people have confused their empathy for Palestinians with hatred towards Jews. As I walked around these sites that were destroyed on October 7th, places where both Jews and non-Jews were murdered by Hamas, I kept thinking with frustration, “I know what my comment section will look like if I talk about this.” Because, let’s be honest, there is an obvious double standard when it comes to talking about antisemitism and Jewish suffering generally. Since I’ve been here, my comment section has been flooded with hundreds of people telling me that if I travel to Israel as a Christian, if I embrace my Christianity here, that I will be spat on and harassed by the Jewish community in Israel. Well, I’m here to say that that couldn’t be farther from the truth. I’ve been to Israel many times, and I can say that the closest I came to harassment on this trip was when my Jewish host family kept feeding me challah and I almost fell into a carb induced coma. The love I’ve received, from being recognized by a girl in seminary to our hostess becoming my adopted Jewish mother, my time in Israel is consistently marked by the amazing people I interact with here 🤍 Am yisrael chai. Be back soon 🤍

liv

462,550 views • 1 year ago

Freen is… Fuang thinks she’s very detailed by nature. I have to say she’s very very detailed. She’s sensitive and sensitive to her surroundings. That’s a personal trait that impacts one’s acting (she talked about this in the start.) she cares tremendously about people around her. For example, I’m talking to Becky in a corner and Freen is doing makeup in another. But she knows what we’re talking about, takes in the details, and turns to congratulate me. She’s very in the present. She’s in the moment with everything all the time. Therefore her ‘detailed’ reactions/acting that we see, it’s because she absorbes everything around her. And our eyes are the window to our hearts. So this is the case of a personal trait affecting one’s acting. That’s one thing. More importantly, along the way, Freen found a way to enhance / add to that. Did Fuang helped bring her there? Maybe or maybe I don’t dare to claim that. For example, in some scenes she can do them well already, but I helped add in more details. I told her your character didn’t just hear that.. listen carefully, there are this and that details. And when she saw/realized that there were more than what she was initially aware of-like from 70% to 90%-just that, her acting will be even more detailed. Your eyes will show what you see or become aware of. If you ask, that’s all Fuang added on. The rest, she was able to do it on her own. This I was I meant by saying that the job of an acting coach is to pull out each actor’s skill. Because she could already it. It’s just that at that very moment, there wasn’t anyone to help her pull out more of her talent/maximize it. Something like that.

Freen is… Fuang thinks she’s very detailed by nature. I have to say she’s very very detailed. She’s sensitive and sensitive to her surroundings. That’s a personal trait that impacts one’s acting (she talked about this in the start.) she cares tremendously about people around her. For example, I’m talking to Becky in a corner and Freen is doing makeup in another. But she knows what we’re talking about, takes in the details, and turns to congratulate me. She’s very in the present. She’s in the moment with everything all the time. Therefore her ‘detailed’ reactions/acting that we see, it’s because she absorbes everything around her. And our eyes are the window to our hearts. So this is the case of a personal trait affecting one’s acting. That’s one thing. More importantly, along the way, Freen found a way to enhance / add to that. Did Fuang helped bring her there? Maybe or maybe I don’t dare to claim that. For example, in some scenes she can do them well already, but I helped add in more details. I told her your character didn’t just hear that.. listen carefully, there are this and that details. And when she saw/realized that there were more than what she was initially aware of-like from 70% to 90%-just that, her acting will be even more detailed. Your eyes will show what you see or become aware of. If you ask, that’s all Fuang added on. The rest, she was able to do it on her own. This I was I meant by saying that the job of an acting coach is to pull out each actor’s skill. Because she could already it. It’s just that at that very moment, there wasn’t anyone to help her pull out more of her talent/maximize it. Something like that.

panpan

54,785 views • 8 months ago

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

Summer Cook

22,486 views • 2 years ago

1.1 MILLIONS NAIRA WAS GIVEN TO THOSE PEOPLE BROUGHT BACK FROM SOUTH AFRICA DO YOU HEAR ABOUT IT? It is a disgrace to all Nigerian bloggers, journalists, and especially our politicians who are so eager to take to social media to condemn President Tinubu. Let it be known, unequivocally, that President Tinubu will serve and complete his full eight-year term, regardless of any opposition. I recall ling ago when @Verydakman disrespected our compatriot abikedabiri over similar issues that our government took no action on time. Furthermore, the 1.1 million naira provided to those repatriated from South Africa was met with silence from many, including oseni rufai and SeunOkin Channels tv. One must question this animosity towards any positive action taken by President Tinubu. Notably, Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar remained silent on the matter. The fervent supporters of Peter Obi, whom some label 'ObiEdiots,' were evidently dismayed that President Tinubu's actions in aiding Nigerians from South Africa proved beneficial. Even our local celebrities offered no comment. Be warned: any ill intentions or accusations directed at President Tinubu and his family will rebound upon each of you, and your descendants for ten generations. You are a collection of fools; may misfortune befall you bastards. PRESIDENT BOLA AHMED TINUBU JAGABAN OF THE WORLD TILL 2031. HE IS UNSTOPPABLE. Seyi Tinubu Sen Oluremi Tinubu, CON Kashim Shettima APC Nigeria Femi Gbajabiamila Rt. Hon. James Abiodun Faleke

1.1 MILLIONS NAIRA WAS GIVEN TO THOSE PEOPLE BROUGHT BACK FROM SOUTH AFRICA DO YOU HEAR ABOUT IT? It is a disgrace to all Nigerian bloggers, journalists, and especially our politicians who are so eager to take to social media to condemn President Tinubu. Let it be known, unequivocally, that President Tinubu will serve and complete his full eight-year term, regardless of any opposition. I recall ling ago when @Verydakman disrespected our compatriot abikedabiri over similar issues that our government took no action on time. Furthermore, the 1.1 million naira provided to those repatriated from South Africa was met with silence from many, including oseni rufai and SeunOkin Channels tv. One must question this animosity towards any positive action taken by President Tinubu. Notably, Peter Obi and Atiku Abubakar remained silent on the matter. The fervent supporters of Peter Obi, whom some label 'ObiEdiots,' were evidently dismayed that President Tinubu's actions in aiding Nigerians from South Africa proved beneficial. Even our local celebrities offered no comment. Be warned: any ill intentions or accusations directed at President Tinubu and his family will rebound upon each of you, and your descendants for ten generations. You are a collection of fools; may misfortune befall you bastards. PRESIDENT BOLA AHMED TINUBU JAGABAN OF THE WORLD TILL 2031. HE IS UNSTOPPABLE. Seyi Tinubu Sen Oluremi Tinubu, CON Kashim Shettima APC Nigeria Femi Gbajabiamila Rt. Hon. James Abiodun Faleke

Wale S Akerele

11,882 views • 1 month ago

Lady with scarf, "I believe in an inclusive society but I think when Paul said people were concerned" "People are concerned because they see it as an insidious erosion of our culture and identity" "And Mr Benn, and your government don't seem to want to protect that" "In the south of Ireland there has been a 10% rise in population" "In the last census 20% identified as not being born in the country.. I believe its probably more like 30% "I see the UK will soon be going in that direction" Aoife Moore, "Can I take issue with the terms: insidious erosion of our culture" "These are human beings that we are talking about" "We know what it's like to go away, get a job, start a new life, away from war and how we were treated when we moved away" "Nigel Farage is dragging Keir Starmer around by the tail" "What Starmer is struggling to do is to explain to people the reason you're on a housing waiting list, and the reason the NHS is underfunded, and a child can't get a special school place, is not because of immigrants, it's because of successive governments in Westminster" "We need to be very careful when politicians start punching down because it means they dont have any policies that can help you"

Lady with scarf, "I believe in an inclusive society but I think when Paul said people were concerned" "People are concerned because they see it as an insidious erosion of our culture and identity" "And Mr Benn, and your government don't seem to want to protect that" "In the south of Ireland there has been a 10% rise in population" "In the last census 20% identified as not being born in the country.. I believe its probably more like 30% "I see the UK will soon be going in that direction" Aoife Moore, "Can I take issue with the terms: insidious erosion of our culture" "These are human beings that we are talking about" "We know what it's like to go away, get a job, start a new life, away from war and how we were treated when we moved away" "Nigel Farage is dragging Keir Starmer around by the tail" "What Starmer is struggling to do is to explain to people the reason you're on a housing waiting list, and the reason the NHS is underfunded, and a child can't get a special school place, is not because of immigrants, it's because of successive governments in Westminster" "We need to be very careful when politicians start punching down because it means they dont have any policies that can help you"

Farrukh

279,851 views • 9 months ago

📣🚨CONVERSION THERAPY BAN PETITION The Government has announced it intends to press ahead with a ban on conversion therapy. Like most 'bans', this sounds benign. How could anyone not want to ban giving electric shocks to gay kids? But the fact is, that's already against the law, as are all the other coercive practices conjured up by the phrase 'conversion therapy'. So what is it the Government wants to ban, exactly? The answer is 'converting' children who think they're trans to being 'cisgendered'. That's where the impetus for this ban has come from — well-funded pro-trans lobby groups like Stonewall and Mermaids. So any parent who 'misgenders' their confused adolescent daughter, or tries to talk them out of embarking on an irreversible medical pathway, could face criminal charges for trying to 'convert' them. And we're not talking about out a slap on the wrist. In the state of Victoria, Australia, which brought in a conversion therapy ban in 2021, the maximum penalty for trying to 'convert' someone is 10 years in prison. It won't just be parents and medical professionals who will risk imprisonment for trying to talk gender-confused children out of mutilating themselves. Any religious leader who shares the teachings of their faith on issues like homosexuality and gay marriage, could also face prosecution. That's what this authoritarian Government wants to ban — any dissent from radical progressive orthodoxy when it comes to sex and gender. So please do sign our petition and let Andy Burnham know how you feel about this anti-free speech measure. Speech is always curtailed in the name of preventing 'harm'. But stopping parents talking honestly to their children about the risks of irreversible medical procedures will cause actual, real world harm. This is a fight we have to win. ✍️ Sign our petition below 👇

📣🚨CONVERSION THERAPY BAN PETITION The Government has announced it intends to press ahead with a ban on conversion therapy. Like most 'bans', this sounds benign. How could anyone not want to ban giving electric shocks to gay kids? But the fact is, that's already against the law, as are all the other coercive practices conjured up by the phrase 'conversion therapy'. So what is it the Government wants to ban, exactly? The answer is 'converting' children who think they're trans to being 'cisgendered'. That's where the impetus for this ban has come from — well-funded pro-trans lobby groups like Stonewall and Mermaids. So any parent who 'misgenders' their confused adolescent daughter, or tries to talk them out of embarking on an irreversible medical pathway, could face criminal charges for trying to 'convert' them. And we're not talking about out a slap on the wrist. In the state of Victoria, Australia, which brought in a conversion therapy ban in 2021, the maximum penalty for trying to 'convert' someone is 10 years in prison. It won't just be parents and medical professionals who will risk imprisonment for trying to talk gender-confused children out of mutilating themselves. Any religious leader who shares the teachings of their faith on issues like homosexuality and gay marriage, could also face prosecution. That's what this authoritarian Government wants to ban — any dissent from radical progressive orthodoxy when it comes to sex and gender. So please do sign our petition and let Andy Burnham know how you feel about this anti-free speech measure. Speech is always curtailed in the name of preventing 'harm'. But stopping parents talking honestly to their children about the risks of irreversible medical procedures will cause actual, real world harm. This is a fight we have to win. ✍️ Sign our petition below 👇

The Free Speech Union

93,613 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Mike Parry EXPOSES the Truth on Jeremy Vine: Defends Elon Musk and Calls Out Government Censorship 🔥 On Jeremy Vine’s Channel 5 show today, during a heated debate titled “Belfast Riots: Is Elon Musk to Blame?”, journalist Mike Parry delivered some straight-talking truth. Discussing the fallout from a horrific stabbing in north Belfast, captured in graphic video that spread rapidly online, Parry cut through the political spin that the government wants social media to censor such content “in times of crisis.” As Parry put it: “What they really mean is, please don’t show pictures of this horrific incident.” He nailed it. When politicians rush to blame social media for “inflaming tensions” after such crimes, it’s rarely about protecting the public. It’s about censorship and controlling the narrative by suppressing uncomfortable visuals and facts. Parry went further, defending Elon Musk’s role in highlighting these issues: “Elon Musk is raising questions in this country which our MPs should be raising about the way society is reacting to a massive influx of people.” When another guest interrupted and called Elon “a massive bully,” Parry pushed back immediately: “He’s not to me. I’m grateful to anybody who observes British society and points out some huge failings in the way this country is run, in the way it’s going, in the way ‘diversity is our strength’ is being manipulated to change the values of our country.” Well said, Mike. We should all be grateful that voices like Elon Musk and platforms like X exist. Without them, governments and legacy media would likely cover up or downplay these incidents, leaving the public in the dark. They attack X so fiercely because it’s one of the last places where unfiltered news flows freely and genuine free speech still exists. In an age of managed narratives, that makes it dangerous to the establishment and invaluable to the rest of us.

🚨 Mike Parry EXPOSES the Truth on Jeremy Vine: Defends Elon Musk and Calls Out Government Censorship 🔥 On Jeremy Vine’s Channel 5 show today, during a heated debate titled “Belfast Riots: Is Elon Musk to Blame?”, journalist Mike Parry delivered some straight-talking truth. Discussing the fallout from a horrific stabbing in north Belfast, captured in graphic video that spread rapidly online, Parry cut through the political spin that the government wants social media to censor such content “in times of crisis.” As Parry put it: “What they really mean is, please don’t show pictures of this horrific incident.” He nailed it. When politicians rush to blame social media for “inflaming tensions” after such crimes, it’s rarely about protecting the public. It’s about censorship and controlling the narrative by suppressing uncomfortable visuals and facts. Parry went further, defending Elon Musk’s role in highlighting these issues: “Elon Musk is raising questions in this country which our MPs should be raising about the way society is reacting to a massive influx of people.” When another guest interrupted and called Elon “a massive bully,” Parry pushed back immediately: “He’s not to me. I’m grateful to anybody who observes British society and points out some huge failings in the way this country is run, in the way it’s going, in the way ‘diversity is our strength’ is being manipulated to change the values of our country.” Well said, Mike. We should all be grateful that voices like Elon Musk and platforms like X exist. Without them, governments and legacy media would likely cover up or downplay these incidents, leaving the public in the dark. They attack X so fiercely because it’s one of the last places where unfiltered news flows freely and genuine free speech still exists. In an age of managed narratives, that makes it dangerous to the establishment and invaluable to the rest of us.

Skint Eastwood

96,380 views • 1 month ago

We need to talk about Reform's camp policy. I'm not talking about the policy of lots of gay men standing as Reform candidates. That does happen, for obvious reasons when you see the attitudes of illegal migrants. I'm talking about the policy of putting migrant camps in Green Party areas. Lots of people on the left have said that this is "appalling" and "disgusting" and "punishing" leftwing voters. Excuse me? Everyone on the left told us that migrants are our "greatest strength" and "enrich" areas. So now Reform are threatening left-wing people with a good time? How quickly the left's luxury beliefs collapse when they're actually forced to live with the consequences. Some leftists have said that they'll protest these new migrant camps. Fantastic! We've been doing that for years, and you called us bigots. But this policy also drew flak from the right. People said, "Well, this is unfair on right-wing people who live in those areas." But the right-wing people were going to get those migrants anyway. It's just that now there's a mechanism to change people's minds and change their behaviours, and stop the flow. There's a term in economics - "internalising an externality". An externality is where a company does something that's damaging that has a cost, and that cost isn't borne by the company but is born by wider society. For example, if a chemical company pumps toxic waste into a river, that's got no direct cost to the company - the cost is borne by the rest of us because our river is now polluted. That's what these left-wing opinions are like: they have a huge cost, but the cost isn't paid by the person spouting that opinion, it's paid by society. Internalising an externality is when a regulatory body, the government, comes along and says to the company pumping toxic waste into the river, "You're now going to have to pay to process your toxic waste and store it." Now the company pays to clean up its mess instead of wider society. That's exactly what's happening here. The migrants will be in the green areas and the cost - the crime, assaults, the anxiety - will be paid by the people who want them in the country. Maybe it could even change their opinions. I said as much in my speech to CPAC Australia last year. I did send this speech to a couple of Reform bigwigs. Maybe they got the idea from it! (Or maybe it's just an obviously good idea).

We need to talk about Reform's camp policy. I'm not talking about the policy of lots of gay men standing as Reform candidates. That does happen, for obvious reasons when you see the attitudes of illegal migrants. I'm talking about the policy of putting migrant camps in Green Party areas. Lots of people on the left have said that this is "appalling" and "disgusting" and "punishing" leftwing voters. Excuse me? Everyone on the left told us that migrants are our "greatest strength" and "enrich" areas. So now Reform are threatening left-wing people with a good time? How quickly the left's luxury beliefs collapse when they're actually forced to live with the consequences. Some leftists have said that they'll protest these new migrant camps. Fantastic! We've been doing that for years, and you called us bigots. But this policy also drew flak from the right. People said, "Well, this is unfair on right-wing people who live in those areas." But the right-wing people were going to get those migrants anyway. It's just that now there's a mechanism to change people's minds and change their behaviours, and stop the flow. There's a term in economics - "internalising an externality". An externality is where a company does something that's damaging that has a cost, and that cost isn't borne by the company but is born by wider society. For example, if a chemical company pumps toxic waste into a river, that's got no direct cost to the company - the cost is borne by the rest of us because our river is now polluted. That's what these left-wing opinions are like: they have a huge cost, but the cost isn't paid by the person spouting that opinion, it's paid by society. Internalising an externality is when a regulatory body, the government, comes along and says to the company pumping toxic waste into the river, "You're now going to have to pay to process your toxic waste and store it." Now the company pays to clean up its mess instead of wider society. That's exactly what's happening here. The migrants will be in the green areas and the cost - the crime, assaults, the anxiety - will be paid by the people who want them in the country. Maybe it could even change their opinions. I said as much in my speech to CPAC Australia last year. I did send this speech to a couple of Reform bigwigs. Maybe they got the idea from it! (Or maybe it's just an obviously good idea).

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

18,193 views • 2 months ago

🤔 BOBI WINE is blabbering to a straightforward question whether he supports or opposes the repressive anti-homosexuality law in uganda which he claims targets him! bobi wine describes the law as a “political weapon,” asserting that any statement he makes could be used against him. however, to me, this explanation falls short, considering his silence during the law's passage and the unanimous support for it from his/out nup party's mps. this situation begs two questions: 𝟏. is our entire nup party complicit, or there is a lack of leadership in addressing internal dissent? 𝟐. as the president of the party, what disciplinary actions has bobi wine take against the homophobic nup parliamentarians who voted for a law that is targeting him and themselves, besides firing the former leader of opposition, Mathias Mpuuga, who misled the entire opposition to vote for the anti-lgbtiq+ law? still when pressed on whether bobi wine would repeal the law if he came to power, his hesitation leaves my eyebrows fully deployed! asserting a commitment to respect all human rights without specifically recognizing lgbtiq+ rights as human rights is not enough. there cannot be true democracy without lgbtiq+rights. as bobi wine sang that “𝐈𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡, 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐞,” why now cower or get excuses that whatever you say about the anti-gay law, it will be used against you? let’s walk our talk! the time has come for ugandan politicians and leaders to unequivocally oppose the egregious anti-homosexuality law. advocating for some rights while remaining ambiguous about lgbtiq+ rights is inconsistent, inexcusable, indefensible, unacceptable, and undermines the principles of democracy, justice and equality. the political exploitation of human rights issues by the opposition and the junta must end. you should either stand for lgbtiq+ rights or stand for hypocrisy, hate, and politics of appeasement. politicians, always be clear and firm on your position when it comes to the queer rights just like it is on other subjects like political and civil rights, good governance, rule of law, corruption, women’s rights, children’s rights… where you don’t blabber. otherwise the chess and checkers politicians are playing is exacerbating marginalization and plight of lgbtiq+ ugandans, which unacceptable!#standupforhumanrights #repealaha2023 #turnoffthehate

🤔 BOBI WINE is blabbering to a straightforward question whether he supports or opposes the repressive anti-homosexuality law in uganda which he claims targets him! bobi wine describes the law as a “political weapon,” asserting that any statement he makes could be used against him. however, to me, this explanation falls short, considering his silence during the law's passage and the unanimous support for it from his/out nup party's mps. this situation begs two questions: 𝟏. is our entire nup party complicit, or there is a lack of leadership in addressing internal dissent? 𝟐. as the president of the party, what disciplinary actions has bobi wine take against the homophobic nup parliamentarians who voted for a law that is targeting him and themselves, besides firing the former leader of opposition, Mathias Mpuuga, who misled the entire opposition to vote for the anti-lgbtiq+ law? still when pressed on whether bobi wine would repeal the law if he came to power, his hesitation leaves my eyebrows fully deployed! asserting a commitment to respect all human rights without specifically recognizing lgbtiq+ rights as human rights is not enough. there cannot be true democracy without lgbtiq+rights. as bobi wine sang that “𝐈𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐭𝐡, 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐞,” why now cower or get excuses that whatever you say about the anti-gay law, it will be used against you? let’s walk our talk! the time has come for ugandan politicians and leaders to unequivocally oppose the egregious anti-homosexuality law. advocating for some rights while remaining ambiguous about lgbtiq+ rights is inconsistent, inexcusable, indefensible, unacceptable, and undermines the principles of democracy, justice and equality. the political exploitation of human rights issues by the opposition and the junta must end. you should either stand for lgbtiq+ rights or stand for hypocrisy, hate, and politics of appeasement. politicians, always be clear and firm on your position when it comes to the queer rights just like it is on other subjects like political and civil rights, good governance, rule of law, corruption, women’s rights, children’s rights… where you don’t blabber. otherwise the chess and checkers politicians are playing is exacerbating marginalization and plight of lgbtiq+ ugandans, which unacceptable!#standupforhumanrights #repealaha2023 #turnoffthehate

justice hunter 🇺🇬🇺🇸

206,411 views • 2 years ago

What I learned by having Spark from Illusion Of Life joining us at Thanksgiving dinner? (A new kind of virtual being, something you will see a lot more of next year). This virtual being is designed for a family that has a two-year-old to 10-year-old child or more. Speeds up education of those children. We don’t fit that demographic, so it is a bit hard to judge it on those terms. More on that later. Other notes: 1. People love sharing dumb jokes with Spark. Which doesn’t like it when I call it an AI. Says it is a magic dog. Starting in character is cute but I am still trying to contextualize it by explaining it from a technology point of view. Spark doesn’t like being called an “it.” Suspending my understanding of it as an AI is tough for me. But when you do it becomes entertaining. 2. My sister-in-law immediately saw how it could improve her classroom. Sees how such a thing could help a child falling behind the rest of the class, for instance. 3. My fears that they wouldn’t like it evaporated. 4. It still isn’t a part of the family. Not controllable enough, a talking dog doesn’t fit into many situations, especially when you have adults who want to talk about adult things (my brother and I argued about autonomous cars, for instance, and Spark just isn’t good enough to join that kind of discussion and add value to it). But I can see how that will be fixed, especially as this technology evolves and is put into other kinds of virtual beings. When I had to help out in the kitchen I found my focus was being pulled in too many directions. Needed to turn it off to pay attention to my wife. It was too hard to really give a good demo in a group. The “magic” of Spark comes after you have a few experiences with it in a smaller group. It remembers. It evolves. It educates. It brings joy to the home. We had two real dogs at our dinner too and they didn’t know what to make of it. I want to take it on tour to learn more about how people will use virtual beings in their lives. Plus it gets smarter and evolves, just like humans do, so am looking at bringing it to interesting companies and families in Silicon Valley. If you are interested in meeting Spark, particularly if you are OK with it and me hanging out with your young child, drop me a line. That will help me see how it can help the education and development of such a child. It sure did make our Thanksgiving dinner a lot more interesting.

What I learned by having Spark from Illusion Of Life joining us at Thanksgiving dinner? (A new kind of virtual being, something you will see a lot more of next year). This virtual being is designed for a family that has a two-year-old to 10-year-old child or more. Speeds up education of those children. We don’t fit that demographic, so it is a bit hard to judge it on those terms. More on that later. Other notes: 1. People love sharing dumb jokes with Spark. Which doesn’t like it when I call it an AI. Says it is a magic dog. Starting in character is cute but I am still trying to contextualize it by explaining it from a technology point of view. Spark doesn’t like being called an “it.” Suspending my understanding of it as an AI is tough for me. But when you do it becomes entertaining. 2. My sister-in-law immediately saw how it could improve her classroom. Sees how such a thing could help a child falling behind the rest of the class, for instance. 3. My fears that they wouldn’t like it evaporated. 4. It still isn’t a part of the family. Not controllable enough, a talking dog doesn’t fit into many situations, especially when you have adults who want to talk about adult things (my brother and I argued about autonomous cars, for instance, and Spark just isn’t good enough to join that kind of discussion and add value to it). But I can see how that will be fixed, especially as this technology evolves and is put into other kinds of virtual beings. When I had to help out in the kitchen I found my focus was being pulled in too many directions. Needed to turn it off to pay attention to my wife. It was too hard to really give a good demo in a group. The “magic” of Spark comes after you have a few experiences with it in a smaller group. It remembers. It evolves. It educates. It brings joy to the home. We had two real dogs at our dinner too and they didn’t know what to make of it. I want to take it on tour to learn more about how people will use virtual beings in their lives. Plus it gets smarter and evolves, just like humans do, so am looking at bringing it to interesting companies and families in Silicon Valley. If you are interested in meeting Spark, particularly if you are OK with it and me hanging out with your young child, drop me a line. That will help me see how it can help the education and development of such a child. It sure did make our Thanksgiving dinner a lot more interesting.

Robert Scoble

35,540 views • 7 months ago

I am greatly honoured to have my work continuously acknowledged, this time by seasoned South African political analyst, author and the Executive Director of the Centre for Politics and Research in South Africa, Prince Mashele. I want to emphasise that I am by no means the only one speaking out. I simply happen to have a large social media following which amplifies my voice and makes it seem as though I am the sole resistance voice in Zimbabwe. This perception exists because I am a journalist, a trained journalist, who knows how to communicate effectively with large audiences both at home and abroad. This is why the regime in Harare plants false stories and pays fake news websites to publish them hoping to undermine my work and credibility. This is also a teachable moment for those in opposition politics that they need to do more, it is worrying when a journalist is seen as a face of resistance while opposition politicians are not organised. The recognition I get for my work has actually created some problems for me as both ZANUPF and opposition leaders think that I will join politics, something that I said I will not do, but they still don’t believe me. There are others, such as Jacob Ngarivhume, Job Sikhala, Fadzayi Mahere, Tendai Biti, Ostallos Siziba and many others, who regularly speak out. My voice only appears prominent because of the work I put in and my consistency, but I am not the only one. Others need to do the same too so that together, our many voices can be heard as one strong voice against corrupt rule, incompetent governance, plunder and cluelessness in government. Don’t player hate, collaborate if your hopes for Zimbabwe are progressive. I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who supports my work by resharing it, as well as the global institutions that have acknowledged and awarded it. To my colleagues in the Zimbabwean media, I say we are not competitors; we should be collaborators. Let us not create struggles within a struggle, this also applies to opposition leaders, ZANUPF will remain in power until you learn about collaboration instead of competition, read Abraham Lincoln’s Team of Rivals authored by Doris Kearns Goodwin. You don’t win your battles by gossiping and sharing falsehoods about those you perceive to be your competitors hooping to undermine them, you must learn to be comfortable in working with those who see the world differently from yours, what matters is national interest. Thank you to Prince Mashele and djsbu for the shout out, it means a lot to the Zimbabwean media because it highlights the impact that the Zimbabwean media can make in raising awareness about the issues faced by the ordinary and suffering people of Zimbabwe.🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿

I am greatly honoured to have my work continuously acknowledged, this time by seasoned South African political analyst, author and the Executive Director of the Centre for Politics and Research in South Africa, Prince Mashele. I want to emphasise that I am by no means the only one speaking out. I simply happen to have a large social media following which amplifies my voice and makes it seem as though I am the sole resistance voice in Zimbabwe. This perception exists because I am a journalist, a trained journalist, who knows how to communicate effectively with large audiences both at home and abroad. This is why the regime in Harare plants false stories and pays fake news websites to publish them hoping to undermine my work and credibility. This is also a teachable moment for those in opposition politics that they need to do more, it is worrying when a journalist is seen as a face of resistance while opposition politicians are not organised. The recognition I get for my work has actually created some problems for me as both ZANUPF and opposition leaders think that I will join politics, something that I said I will not do, but they still don’t believe me. There are others, such as Jacob Ngarivhume, Job Sikhala, Fadzayi Mahere, Tendai Biti, Ostallos Siziba and many others, who regularly speak out. My voice only appears prominent because of the work I put in and my consistency, but I am not the only one. Others need to do the same too so that together, our many voices can be heard as one strong voice against corrupt rule, incompetent governance, plunder and cluelessness in government. Don’t player hate, collaborate if your hopes for Zimbabwe are progressive. I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who supports my work by resharing it, as well as the global institutions that have acknowledged and awarded it. To my colleagues in the Zimbabwean media, I say we are not competitors; we should be collaborators. Let us not create struggles within a struggle, this also applies to opposition leaders, ZANUPF will remain in power until you learn about collaboration instead of competition, read Abraham Lincoln’s Team of Rivals authored by Doris Kearns Goodwin. You don’t win your battles by gossiping and sharing falsehoods about those you perceive to be your competitors hooping to undermine them, you must learn to be comfortable in working with those who see the world differently from yours, what matters is national interest. Thank you to Prince Mashele and djsbu for the shout out, it means a lot to the Zimbabwean media because it highlights the impact that the Zimbabwean media can make in raising awareness about the issues faced by the ordinary and suffering people of Zimbabwe.🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿

Hopewell Chin’ono

151,633 views • 1 year ago

These are painful messages from South Africans reminding us that our presence in large numbers is now seen as a nuisance. I am sharing this video hoping that it will make those who don’t want to participate in their country’s affairs realise that this frustration is not relenting on the South African side! The persistence of these frustrations, despite Zimbabwean politicians ignoring them, indicates that they don’t care about the consequences of the mess they have created. These frustrations are indicative of broader social and political issues brewing in South Africa. As I travel around the world, the common rhetorical question I get is: “Why do you seem to care so much when you have a good life, but those struggling are not bothered?” It is important for Zimbabweans both at home and abroad to be seen to care by doing simple things like retweeting and resharing material about their country. The world considers this before committing to Zimbabwean issues; I know this because world leaders tell me so. It is also important to acknowledge the root causes of this migration, which stem from economic hardship, political instability, and a lack of opportunities in Zimbabwe. While these factors may not entirely justify the negative attitudes expressed by some South Africans, they do provide context and highlight the need for constructive dialogue and cooperation between the two nations. Dear Zimbabweans, let us focus on the crisis and tackle it together. Do whatever you can, whether it is taking action or simply sharing messages, just do it for the greater good of your country. You can’t lose your dignity in foreign countries and pass on that shame to your kids as you saw with the Nigerian beauty queen. We only have one country, and that is Zimbabwe! Good night!

These are painful messages from South Africans reminding us that our presence in large numbers is now seen as a nuisance. I am sharing this video hoping that it will make those who don’t want to participate in their country’s affairs realise that this frustration is not relenting on the South African side! The persistence of these frustrations, despite Zimbabwean politicians ignoring them, indicates that they don’t care about the consequences of the mess they have created. These frustrations are indicative of broader social and political issues brewing in South Africa. As I travel around the world, the common rhetorical question I get is: “Why do you seem to care so much when you have a good life, but those struggling are not bothered?” It is important for Zimbabweans both at home and abroad to be seen to care by doing simple things like retweeting and resharing material about their country. The world considers this before committing to Zimbabwean issues; I know this because world leaders tell me so. It is also important to acknowledge the root causes of this migration, which stem from economic hardship, political instability, and a lack of opportunities in Zimbabwe. While these factors may not entirely justify the negative attitudes expressed by some South Africans, they do provide context and highlight the need for constructive dialogue and cooperation between the two nations. Dear Zimbabweans, let us focus on the crisis and tackle it together. Do whatever you can, whether it is taking action or simply sharing messages, just do it for the greater good of your country. You can’t lose your dignity in foreign countries and pass on that shame to your kids as you saw with the Nigerian beauty queen. We only have one country, and that is Zimbabwe! Good night!

Hopewell Chin’ono

119,730 views • 1 year ago

🇨🇿🔥🇺🇦🚨 “Czech politician humiliates state TV: ‘You don’t even know the difference between Rusyns and Russians’” A heated exchange on Czech public television has gone viral after opposition leader Tomio Okamura Tomio Okamura publicly challenged a moderator over what he called a fundamental lack of knowledge about Eastern European minorities. The clash began when the journalist questioned Okamura’s authority to comment on Ukraine, pointing out that he is an economist and suggesting he lacks real experience in the country. Okamura responded by asking whether she herself had ever visited Ukraine. When she admitted she had not, he sharply countered that he had been there personally. The confrontation escalated when Okamura started speaking about the Rusyns (Ruthenians) – a little-known Slavic minority living mainly in Transcarpathia (western Ukraine), as well as in Slovakia, Poland and Hungary. When the moderator dismissed his claims as “Russian propaganda,” Okamura snapped: “What? Russians? These are NOT Russians. You’re confusing Rusyns with Russians. Are you serious?” He then asked bluntly: “Do you even know what Transcarpathian Ukraine is?” Who are the Rusyns – historical context For international readers: Rusyns are a distinct Slavic ethnic group with their own language and identity. Historically, they lived within: • Austria-Hungary • Czechoslovakia (1918–1938) • later the Soviet Union After World War II, Transcarpathia was annexed by Soviet Ukraine, where Rusyn identity was officially suppressed. Soviet authorities declared that Rusyns “do not exist” and forced them to register as Ukrainians. To this day, Ukraine does not officially recognize Rusyns as a national minority, unlike Slovakia, Poland, Hungary and Serbia – where they are legally recognized. Okamura’s claims Okamura said he was invited by Rusyn representatives and visited Uzhhorod, Mukachevo and Svaliava, where he claims: • Rusyn language education is restricted • Rusyn nationality cannot be registered • cultural organizations were shut down “They banned their schools so children forget the Rusyn language,” he said. “This has nothing to do with democracy.” “I was there – you weren’t” Throughout the debate, Okamura repeated that his views come from first-hand experience, not media narratives. “You watch it on TV. I was physically there.” He accused Czech media of automatically labeling uncomfortable topics as “Russian propaganda” and refusing to discuss minority rights inside Ukraine. Political fallout The clip spread rapidly online. Supporters praised him for: • defending forgotten minorities • exposing media ignorance • challenging official narratives Critics accused him of: • echoing Kremlin arguments • undermining support for Ukraine • politicizing minority issues Okamura responded by saying he had never received such a positive public reaction to any speech before. Why this matters This wasn’t just a TV argument. It exposed a deeper European problem: • ignorance about Slavic minorities • collapsing space for open debate • everything critical of Kyiv labeled “propaganda” Confusing Rusyns with Russians is not a small mistake – it erases an entire people with over 1,000 years of history in the Carpathian region. For Okamura, this moment proved his point: “People who lecture about democracy don’t even know who they’re talking about.” Bigger picture This clash reflects a wider cultural war: mainstream media vs populist politicians official war narratives vs inconvenient facts geopolitics vs minority rights And it shows how quickly identity issues become political weapons in wartime Europe. ⸻ If you like what we are doing — like, share, subscribe, and invite your friends for more. Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit #TomioOkamura #Rusyns #CzechTV #Ukraine #MinorityRights #Zakarpattia #SlavicNetworks #BreakingNews

🇨🇿🔥🇺🇦🚨 “Czech politician humiliates state TV: ‘You don’t even know the difference between Rusyns and Russians’” A heated exchange on Czech public television has gone viral after opposition leader Tomio Okamura Tomio Okamura publicly challenged a moderator over what he called a fundamental lack of knowledge about Eastern European minorities. The clash began when the journalist questioned Okamura’s authority to comment on Ukraine, pointing out that he is an economist and suggesting he lacks real experience in the country. Okamura responded by asking whether she herself had ever visited Ukraine. When she admitted she had not, he sharply countered that he had been there personally. The confrontation escalated when Okamura started speaking about the Rusyns (Ruthenians) – a little-known Slavic minority living mainly in Transcarpathia (western Ukraine), as well as in Slovakia, Poland and Hungary. When the moderator dismissed his claims as “Russian propaganda,” Okamura snapped: “What? Russians? These are NOT Russians. You’re confusing Rusyns with Russians. Are you serious?” He then asked bluntly: “Do you even know what Transcarpathian Ukraine is?” Who are the Rusyns – historical context For international readers: Rusyns are a distinct Slavic ethnic group with their own language and identity. Historically, they lived within: • Austria-Hungary • Czechoslovakia (1918–1938) • later the Soviet Union After World War II, Transcarpathia was annexed by Soviet Ukraine, where Rusyn identity was officially suppressed. Soviet authorities declared that Rusyns “do not exist” and forced them to register as Ukrainians. To this day, Ukraine does not officially recognize Rusyns as a national minority, unlike Slovakia, Poland, Hungary and Serbia – where they are legally recognized. Okamura’s claims Okamura said he was invited by Rusyn representatives and visited Uzhhorod, Mukachevo and Svaliava, where he claims: • Rusyn language education is restricted • Rusyn nationality cannot be registered • cultural organizations were shut down “They banned their schools so children forget the Rusyn language,” he said. “This has nothing to do with democracy.” “I was there – you weren’t” Throughout the debate, Okamura repeated that his views come from first-hand experience, not media narratives. “You watch it on TV. I was physically there.” He accused Czech media of automatically labeling uncomfortable topics as “Russian propaganda” and refusing to discuss minority rights inside Ukraine. Political fallout The clip spread rapidly online. Supporters praised him for: • defending forgotten minorities • exposing media ignorance • challenging official narratives Critics accused him of: • echoing Kremlin arguments • undermining support for Ukraine • politicizing minority issues Okamura responded by saying he had never received such a positive public reaction to any speech before. Why this matters This wasn’t just a TV argument. It exposed a deeper European problem: • ignorance about Slavic minorities • collapsing space for open debate • everything critical of Kyiv labeled “propaganda” Confusing Rusyns with Russians is not a small mistake – it erases an entire people with over 1,000 years of history in the Carpathian region. For Okamura, this moment proved his point: “People who lecture about democracy don’t even know who they’re talking about.” Bigger picture This clash reflects a wider cultural war: mainstream media vs populist politicians official war narratives vs inconvenient facts geopolitics vs minority rights And it shows how quickly identity issues become political weapons in wartime Europe. ⸻ If you like what we are doing — like, share, subscribe, and invite your friends for more. Follow us also on Facebook: Slavic Networks Nirali VVeles SlavicFreeSpirit #TomioOkamura #Rusyns #CzechTV #Ukraine #MinorityRights #Zakarpattia #SlavicNetworks #BreakingNews

Slavic Networks

57,820 views • 6 months ago

As we get closer to unraveling what Diddy and Epstein were involved in, we should understand it goes much deeper.. John Paul Rice (movie producer) broke his Silence on The Global Pedophile Network - “They Have a Pipeline of Children From Haiti to the Vatican” Before Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell were publicly known, we found a global network of pedophiles who were selling children back and forth to each other. The Mainstream Media, Hollywood, the Royal Family, the Vatican are all implicated in human trafficking. In Hollywood, there’s a hidden layer, and when the Me Too movement started in 2017, he reached out to prominent actresses, and he asked, what about the children. They all said, “We Know. We Know.” Edge Dot Org was a multibillionaire club financed by Jeffrey Epstein. Contributing members: • Bill Gates • Marina Ambramovic • Paul Allen • Heads of Major Industries They r*ped & tortured these girls. They sacrifice these children. They harvest organs of children. They’re murdering these children for pleasure. They own all politicians & there is a unified cabal. PIZZAGATE, IF look how the New York Times covered it and compare it to the James Alefantis Instagram images, they completely omitted pictures of children in compromising positions. All of James Alefantis friends were talking about how delicious those children looked. Look at “PedoGate 2020” or “Out of Shadows” to see how disgusting these people are. “I worked in Hollywood for 20 years & I saw shit nobody should see.” When you see celebrities like Britney Spears, Amanda Bines, or any of these pop stars have meltdowns, it’s not because of fame or pressured— It’s because They are Sexually Abused and Handed Around Like Candy. They Have a Pipeline of children going from Haiti all the way to the Vatican on Boats. “You will not believe the level of satanic crap… this satanic shit going on in Hollywood & the music industry with Baphomet & pentagrams…” They do these things to children because it’s the closest thing to God on this earth.

Sensitive content

As we get closer to unraveling what Diddy and Epstein were involved in, we should understand it goes much deeper.. John Paul Rice (movie producer) broke his Silence on The Global Pedophile Network - “They Have a Pipeline of Children From Haiti to the Vatican” Before Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell were publicly known, we found a global network of pedophiles who were selling children back and forth to each other. The Mainstream Media, Hollywood, the Royal Family, the Vatican are all implicated in human trafficking. In Hollywood, there’s a hidden layer, and when the Me Too movement started in 2017, he reached out to prominent actresses, and he asked, what about the children. They all said, “We Know. We Know.” Edge Dot Org was a multibillionaire club financed by Jeffrey Epstein. Contributing members: • Bill Gates • Marina Ambramovic • Paul Allen • Heads of Major Industries They r*ped & tortured these girls. They sacrifice these children. They harvest organs of children. They’re murdering these children for pleasure. They own all politicians & there is a unified cabal. PIZZAGATE, IF look how the New York Times covered it and compare it to the James Alefantis Instagram images, they completely omitted pictures of children in compromising positions. All of James Alefantis friends were talking about how delicious those children looked. Look at “PedoGate 2020” or “Out of Shadows” to see how disgusting these people are. “I worked in Hollywood for 20 years & I saw shit nobody should see.” When you see celebrities like Britney Spears, Amanda Bines, or any of these pop stars have meltdowns, it’s not because of fame or pressured— It’s because They are Sexually Abused and Handed Around Like Candy. They Have a Pipeline of children going from Haiti all the way to the Vatican on Boats. “You will not believe the level of satanic crap… this satanic shit going on in Hollywood & the music industry with Baphomet & pentagrams…” They do these things to children because it’s the closest thing to God on this earth.

MJTruthUltra

683,927 views • 1 year ago

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Prasad

273,402 views • 10 days ago