正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

DISHONORABLE JUDGES MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE! The same D.C. judges who spent years denying due process to Trump supporters are now suddenly activist champions of justice—but only for illegal immigrants. Judge James Boasberg is at the center of this hypocrisy, proving due process only matters when it serves the...

67,793 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Angry Fleas 的头像
Angry Fleas1 年前

J6? Who's been denied due process - can you name names?

Slingshot News 的头像
Slingshot News1 年前

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Here’s How Donald Trump Can Break China’s Battery Monopoly What do YOU think about this idea? Let us know in the comments ⬇️ Be sure to follow @NewsSlingshot for more exclusive reports!

Jake Angeli-Chansley 的头像
Jake Angeli-Chansley1 年前

Stay in it Cara & keep up the GREAT WORK! We got this! They are on the defense...

Gibson4NYSgov 的头像
Gibson4NYSgov1 年前

When the judicial system turn in the very people it supposed to serve. Sad times. @JudiciaryGOP @HouseGOP @SenateGOP y’all can fix this asap, why y’all dragging your feet?

SumGurl 的头像
SumGurl1 年前

@NobleOne Please impeach him if it's possible. NOBODY TELLS POTUS WHAT TO DO! POTUS IS DOING WHAT I ELECTED HIM TO DO. THAT JUDGE IS WAY OUT OF BOUNDS AND OVER HIS HEAD! IMPEACH HIM NOW!

The America First Warehouse 的头像
The America First Warehouse1 年前

Check out the Latest Edition of the "Know Your Enemies" Podcast featuring @UcnyN and Stephen Ruth with special guest @RitaPalma

Debmarie54 的头像
Debmarie541 年前

@realMikeLindell

Chris Lee 的头像
Chris Lee1 年前

Lower court judges do *not* have the power to do what they're doing, and Trump should not be complying. Think of it this way: For the SCotUS to make any ruling these SINGLE judges have, it would require FIVE of them. How is it that single, lower court judges have more authority?

Sara 的头像
Sara1 年前

Thank you Cara for accurate reporting and cutting straight to the heart of the matter 🇺🇸⚖️

Todd Klun 的头像
Todd Klun1 年前

@AGPamBondi wont do a damned thing .

II_Perseverance_II 的头像
II_Perseverance_II1 年前

@RealJoeBiggs jew judges wanting to keep all these 3rd world non-whites in the former united states isn’t a shock at all.

相关视频

BREAKING: Articles of Impeachment Filed Against Rogue Judge Boasberg | Matt Margolis, PJ Media Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) will formally introduce articles of impeachment against radical left-wing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg for what he calls the judge’s “corrupt and unethical” role in the so-called Arctic Frost investigation. "Chief Judge Boasberg has compromised the impartiality of the judiciary and created a constitutional crisis. He is shamelessly weaponizing his power against his political opponents, including Republican members of Congress who are faithfully serving the American people within their jurisdiction," Gill told Fox News Digital. “Judge Boasberg was an accomplice in the egregious Arctic Frost scandal where he equipped the Biden DOJ to spy on Republican senators. His lack of integrity makes him clearly unfit for the gavel. I am proud to once again introduce articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg to hold him accountable for his high crimes and misdemeanors." The articles of impeachment accuses Boasberg of authorizing unconstitutional subpoenas and nondisclosure orders as part of the FBI’s Arctic Frost probe, which, of course, was signed off by Special Counsel Jack Smith. These orders targeted Republican members of Congress—including Sens. Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, and Marsha Blackburn—while they were engaged in their official legislative duties, violating Article I protections. Boasberg is also accused of allowing the DOJ to bar AT&T from informing Senator Cruz about a subpoena for his records for at least a year, citing baseless claims that Cruz might destroy evidence or intimidate witnesses. The resolution argues Boasberg’s actions directly violated 2 U.S.C. § 6628, which protects Senate offices from such secret orders. The resolution further alleges that Boasberg enabled politically motivated subpoenas against conservative organizations like the Conservative Partnership Institute and America First Policy Institute, as well as individuals such as Jeffrey Clark, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and Jenna Ellis—suggesting the court was weaponized to suppress political opponents. The resolution concludes that Boasberg’s conduct demonstrates a “pattern of impropriety” and a failure to uphold constitutional limits, making him unfit to serve and warranting removal from office. Amen! Boasberg has faced mounting criticism for months over his blatantly partisan injunctions against the Trump administration—rulings that many legal experts say have no constitutional foundation. Previous attempts to rein in his judicial overreach and impeach Boasberg earlier this year fizzled out, but this latest effort has real momentum behind it. “Judge Boasberg, who was entrusted to sit on the bench, to be impartial and to be nonpolitical, and to basically, um, um, review cases in front of him and determine the constitutionality and the legality of the claims in front of him, he has taken it on his own to be a hyper-partisan judge, going after Republicans, signing off on subpoenas that are unlawful, and he signed off on them just to get his political rivals,” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) said at a press conference Tuesday. “This is why he needs to be impeached. I commend Congressman Brandon Gill of Texas for leading this effort in the House, to call for articles of impeachment of Judge Boasberg.” The judiciary was never meant to be a playground for partisan power. Congress has not only the right but the obligation to act. This is a test of whether America’s institutions will defend fairness—or protect corruption that hides behind a robe and a gavel. The House must stand firm and remind the nation that no one, not even a judge, is above accountability. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

42,693 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: DC DRAINO, aka Rogan O'Handley, asks the FIRST QUESTION at today's White House press briefing... he asks if Trump should do what Lincoln did and suspend habeas corpus - but only for illegal aliens. This was a GREAT question. DC_Draino: "In Trump's first 99 days, we've seen a coordinated assault on the rule of law by radical judges, thwarting his agenda with an unprecedented level of national injunctions. These judges are providing more due process to violent MS-13 and Tren de Aragua illegal aliens than they did for American citizens who peacefully protested on January 6th." "As Stephen Miller has highlighted, it would be utterly ridiculous for full trials and appeals for the more than 15 million illegal aliens that came across our border under Joe Biden." "Many are now calling for Trump to circumvent these radical judges and consider suspending the writ of habeas corpus solely for these illegal aliens in accordance with the terms of Article 1, Section 9 of the United States Constitution, which explicitly allows for such a measure when there is a rebellion or invasion." "The greatest presidents, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and Democrats' favorite president of all time, FDR - all three of which are not only celebrated by historians, but are immortalized on our national currency with their faces on there." "Furthermore, all three used it against American citizens, where in this instance, we would only be using it against illegal aliens. I think almost every reasonable American would agree that 15 million illegal aliens coming across our border under Joe Biden counts as an invasion, especially since many, as you highlighted, are now robbing, assaulting, r*ping, and k*lling American citizens." "Historic assaults on our republic require reciprocal action from our government. Can you please let us know if and when the Trump administration is planning to suspend the writ of habeas corpus to circumvent these radical judges who are infringing on his Article 2 powers and to start shipping out illegals en masse?" LEAVITT: "I have not heard such discussions take place, but I can assure you [the president is] open to all legal and constitutional remedies to ensure we can continue with the promise TOM HOMAN: "We just arrested a judge... I said from day one: you don't have to support ICE, [but] when you cross that line to impeding, you WILL be prosecuted, judge or not!"

Eric Daugherty

1,427,523 次观看 • 1 年前

JOURNALISTS WERE BANNED FROM ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT ELECTION INTEGRITY FOR FOUR YEARS UNDER THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION (FOR OBVIOUS REASONS). Remember, the Biden DOJ and rogue judges unconstitutionally persecuted, jailed and tortured American citizens and journalists that protested/questioned the 2020 election in order to terrorize us into submission. The FBI even encroached on my home (UN-WELCOMED). By the grace of God, journalists are now permitted to actually do their jobs and ask questions about ELECTION INTEGRITY AND THE 2020 ELECTION. I asked Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt a question about President Trump's election integrity executive order at a press briefing at the White House today. Me- "First and foremost, thank you to the administration for the election integrity executive order because so many journalists for four years were banned from talking about this very subject-so thank you to the administration for that. My question is- yesterday President Trump when signing the order said there’s more to come when it comes to election integrity. Would that include same day voting and hand-counted paper ballots? And why are Democrats against election integrity measures like proof of citizenship when it comes to voting in a United States election?" Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt- "Well, it’s a very good question. You’ll have to ask the Democrats why they are against so many common sense things- not just mandating voter ID…why are they against men in women’s sports, why are they against deporting foreign terrorists from American soil who have been designated a foreign terrorist organization. And I am referring to Tren de Aragua. As for the election integrity order that the President signed yesterday, this is in an effort to restore trust in American elections. There were more than ten steps taken, ten executive actions taken throughout this one order. It directs the attorney general and homeland security to prevent non-citizens from any involvement in administering elections. There is also another host of actions. We can provide the fact sheet for you but it’s a very strong election integrity Executive Order and the President would also like to see Congress do something about this very important issue." Thank you Mike Lindell LindellTV for keeping this fight alive when so many journalists were being canceled and politically persecuted for asking questions about FAIR ELECTIONS. Please go to to watch me cover the White House daily. Remember, in the end GOD wins! Donald J. Trump Mike Lindell LindellTV Rudy W. Giuliani The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson ✝️ Emerald Robinson ✝️ Diamond and Silk® Alison Steinberg Vanessa Broussard Kristi Leigh Mike Crispi Dr. Maria Died Suddenly Lauren Witzke Karoline Leavitt Rapid Response 47 Steven Cheung Stephen Miller The Gateway Pundit Elon Musk Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 Jon Gross Alex Jones Candace Owens Owen Shroyer Enrique Tarrio Jim Hoft GOP Rep. Jim Jordan Matt Gaetz il Donaldo Trumpo I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 Donald Trump Jr. Roger Stone General Mike Flynn

Cara Castronuova

547,815 次观看 • 1 年前

In a full circle redemptive arc moment, President Trump visited the Department of Justice today as the 47th President of the United States and leader of the government agency that once persecuted him. Just a few years ago, the Department of Justice was at the center of a historic and unprecedented prosecution of President Donald Trump. Indicted under the watch of former President Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland, Trump faced relentless legal battles from within these walls. But today, in a full-circle redemption arc moment, he stands here—not as a defendant, but as the 47th President of the United States. And in his remarks, he made clear that his administration is taking action to restore justice. Speaking from the Department of Justice, President Trump wasted no time addressing what he called the agency’s recent corruption. Trump said- "Unfortunately, in recent years, a corrupt group of hacks and radicals within the ranks of the American government obliterated the trust and goodwill built up over generations. They weaponized the vast powers of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies to try and thwart the will of the American People.” To rebuild that trust, Trump mentioned his sweeping reforms, including revoking the security clearances of officials he says abused their power and pardoning those he called political prisoners. Trump said- “On day one, I signed an executive order banning all government censorship. My administration stripped the security clearances of the disgraced intelligence agents who lied about Hunter Biden’s laptop. We revoked the clearances of deranged Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, and the corrupt law firms – I pardoned hundreds of political prisoners who had been grossly mistreated.” It was an incredible moment of redemption for the 47th president—once prosecuted by this institution, now standing at its helm and vowing to clean house. Trump said- "They spied on my campaign, launched one hoax and disinformation operation after another...broke the law on a colossal scale, persecuted my family, staff and supporters...raided my home Mar-a-Lago...and did everything within their power to prevent me from becoming the President of the United States." For President Trump, today’s speech was not just about policy—it was personal. Once the target of what many call a politically motivated persecution, he now stands as the leader of the very government entity that tried to take him down. Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump LindellTV Rudy W. Giuliani Emerald Robinson ✝️ Alison Steinberg Diamond and Silk® Karoline Leavitt Dr. Maria Kristi Leigh Alex Newman The Gateway Pundit Elon Musk Pam Bondi Attorney General Pamela Bondi FBI Director Kash Patel @KashPatel_News Kash Patel U.S. Department of Justice Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Remember, in the end GOD wins!

Cara Castronuova

216,514 次观看 • 1 年前

BOOM: “due process is a variable concept” Professor Alan Dershowitz’s take on the “due process rights” of illegal aliens: "They're [SCOTUS] gonna say, Mr President, you DO have the executive authority to decide who stays and who who doesn't stay. If you're not a citizen of The United States, you're a guest. And if you're a guest, the rules are flexible as to what you can do, what you can say... If you come to this country on a student visa and you start blocking classes for other people and don't let people study and wear masks and harass people, no—you're not welcome. But what the Supreme Court's gonna say is if the president has that authority—and he does—it has to be administered properly, consistently with due process. But due process is a variable concept. It's the process that is due you based on your status. If you're a citizen, you get enormous due process. If you're a, student visa, you get very little due process. If you're a green card holder, it's somewhere in the middle. So I think we're gonna see a series of decisions over the next months and perhaps even next years that will, rationalize how immigration law works in this country." Dershowitz's take on the do-nothing Congress sitting on their asses: "And so far, the legislative branch has been silent. And the interesting thing is the legislative branch can really help avoid a lot of these conflicts because if it passed laws, not executives' actions, laws, the Supreme Court would give more deference and more credence to legislatively enacted laws than to presidentially signed, statements. So right now, we've seen Congress mostly asleep and mostly playing a negative role. Obviously, it has to pass the budget. It has to pass a number of other essential legislative actions. But in a lot of these areas like immigration and deportation, it hasn't done very much." Prof Dershowitz's take on the leftist TDS deranged activist rogue judges' "god complex" disorder: "Even assuming that Bozberg was wrong, dead wrong, completely wrong, had no power, no jurisdiction, even assuming he shouldn't have decided the case because his daughter apparently works for an anti-deportation group and makes a living defending people who are being deported. But assuming all that, assuming he was wrong; he was [also] wrong to say if a judge gives an order, even if it's wrong, that if somebody then disobeys that order, the law is the person could be held in contempt. That is, you're not allowed to disobey an unlawful judicial order. Who made that up? The judges made that up, of course. And the judges have said, even if our order is unlawful, if we say it, you have to abide by it…reminds me of the joke of the angel Gabriel being called, to examine God, and he says we have to have Sigmund Freud come in here to examine God. God has a paranoid mental illness—He thinks he's a federal judge. 😂 You know, federal judges think they are above, the law and above morality. They think that because they're wearing robes…boy, I've been before judges that are so peremptory and so outrageous in their conduct."

John Strand

122,961 次观看 • 1 年前

President Trump has declared that former President Biden's controversial pardons of J6 committee members are void because they were signed using an autopen. Two White House officials from the Biden administration suggested to The New York Post that a key Biden aide may have exceeded their authority by unilaterally determining what to sign. The question we have at Lindell TV is: Who was that staffer? Trump posted: "The pardons that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because they were done by autopen. In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them! The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden. He knew nothing about them, and the people that did may have committed a crime.” When asked if Biden’s autopen orders and pardons are void, Trump replied: "I am sure that Biden did not have any idea that it was taking place and somebody was using an autopen to sign off pardons- as an example, just one example- the J6 Unselect Committee...think of it...they gave pardons with an autopen. I don't think Biden knew anything about it." Trump also mocked Biden by posting an image replacing Biden’s presidential photo with a portrait of an autopen. In his prior post, President Trump added: “Therefore, those on the Unselect Committee, who destroyed and deleted ALL evidence obtained during their two year Witch Hunt of me, and many other innocent people, should fully understand that they are subject to investigation at the highest level.” Today, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked by CNN whether the president’s legal advisers spoke to him before he posted his claim on social media. "The president was begging the question that I think a lot of journalists in this room should be asking," Leavitt said. When pressed for evidence by the CNN reporter, she replied: ‘You're a reporter, you should find out.’" Leavitt’s comments raise bigger questions: Was Biden aware of what was signed in his name? If not, who was actually running the show? And what are the legal and political consequences? We will keep you updated as we investigate. Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump LindellTV Rudy W. Giuliani Emerald Robinson ✝️ Alison Steinberg Diamond and Silk® Karoline Leavitt Dr. Maria Kristi Leigh Alex Newman The Gateway Pundit Elon Musk U.S. Department of Justice Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Liz Cheney Pam Bondi Dan Bongino Dan Bongino FBI Director Kash Patel Kash Patel Enrique Tarrio

Cara Castronuova

140,275 次观看 • 1 年前

Pretrial Solitary Confinement Is Not “Normal” | Due Process, Punishment, And What Happened To Me ⚖️🇺🇸 This video is not politics. It is constitutional rights. It is due process. And it is what happens when “pretrial” starts looking and feeling like punishment. ⚖️ Here is the key point most people do not understand. If you are a pretrial detainee, you have not been convicted. And the Supreme Court has been clear that a pretrial detainee cannot be punished. The government can detain you, but it cannot impose conditions that amount to punishment. That matters because solitary confinement is not a slap on the wrist. Extended isolation changes your mind. It breaks sleep. It breaks peace. It breaks your ability to regulate stress. 🧠 People argue Eighth Amendment, cruel and unusual punishment. But the bigger legal reality for pretrial detention is the Due Process Clause. The Court of Appeals in Bell v. Wolfish relied on due process rather than the Eighth Amendment because pretrial detainees cannot be punished at all. In plain English, pretrial conditions are supposed to be about safety and legitimate detention needs, not retaliation, not political heat, not humiliation, and not breaking a man before he ever sees a jury. That is why I am talking about solitary confinement and due process together. Because pretrial is not supposed to be punishment. And if the conditions become punitive, that is where constitutional violations start. ⚖️ I am sharing this because people see headlines and never see the human cost. I spent long stretches in solitary confinement as a pretrial detainee. Before trial. Before a conviction. Before I was “technically” supposed to be punished. Then I came home and the delayed impact hit. Months later. Not immediately. That is how trauma works. The body keeps the score even when you pretend you are fine. 🧠 This video is also one example in a longer timeline. There were other things that happened to me in custody that I will address separately, with documentation and context, because I do not do rumor and I do not do vague claims. People can hate what I was accused of. People can disagree with me. That does not change the Constitution. Due process either applies to everyone, or it applies to no one. 🇺🇸 Watch the video. Then ask yourself one question. If pretrial detainees can be treated like convicted prisoners, what does “innocent until proven guilty” even mean. 👀

Ryan Nichols Sr.

12,136 次观看 • 5 个月前

Leavitt pointed to what she described as a turning point in U.S. policy: a renewed effort to identify and deport illegal immigrants before they strike. “This administration has already done so much to ensure that we are deporting individuals who seek to do harm in our country and who are in our country illegally.” She cited a major ICE operation in Massachusetts—long considered a safe haven for undocumented immigrants—as a sign of that shift. “ICE Boston just announced the arrest of more than 1100 illegal aliens who were in Boston in the surrounding suburbs in Massachusetts, which was a sanctuary city for—a state for illegal aliens.” Then came the line that defined the Trump administration’s stance. “The only place this country should be a sanctuary for are law abiding American citizens.” Leavitt said President Trump has taken aggressive steps to not only secure the border but to overhaul how visas are granted and enforced. “He has also signed an executive order to streamline and make stricter our legal immigration process and our visa process.” Her warning to those in the country on temporary status was unmistakable. It struck like lightning. “It is a privilege, not a right, to enter the United States of America.” “And we are not going to allow people who are pushing anti-American values and especially engaging in acts of violence, to remain in our country.” “Your visa will be revoked and you will be deported.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

42,883 次观看 • 1 年前

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel “I'm calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant's Daughter's company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father's courtroom - I wanna know the bank records because money doesn't lie - I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction - Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“ That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.

Wall Street Apes

3,331,547 次观看 • 1 年前

WHAT'S THE DEAL WITH THE FRAUDULENT JUSTICE AMY CONEY BARRETT? Barrett sided with loony lib justices and Tren de Aragua gangs, after throwing J6 political hostages under the bus last year in another example of her despicable interpretation of the law (where she again sided with vindictive libs). I asked Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt the administration's comment to Barrett at today's Press Briefing at The White House. Cara Castronuova- “President Trump has designated Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization and deported its members while also moving to restrict Venezuela’s oil exports. Is the administration preparing additional military or economic actions against Venezuela and the Maduro regime? "And my second question is about Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Does the administration have a comment on her decision to go with the liberals, and to go actually with the Tren de Araguas? This is the same Justice that actually sided against January 6th hostages last year. So does the administration have a comment? Are they disappointed in Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett?" Karoline Leavitt- “To your first question I do not have any to readout in terms of Venezuela. The President has imposed secondary tariffs on the Maduro regime and on Venezuela in the form of oil which is obviously going to have a crippling effect on the Maduro Regime and that’s the intended effect of this administration. As for the justice you mentioned, as for the Supreme Court, we’ve made our feelings very clear- we believe this was a massive victory. Certainly we wish this was a 9-0 decision because we firmly believe the President was well within in his Constitutional authority and the Supreme Court made that very clear last night. They put Judge Boasberg in his place. We called onto Supreme Court not reign in these judges, who are acting as Judicial activists - not real arbiters of the truth and the law, and that is exactly what we saw the Supreme Court do yesterday." UNJUST Justice Barrett IS THE WORST. They don't make immaculate justices like Clarence Thomas or Alito anymore. Praying that those two guys live long, long lives. Neil Gorsuch too. In the end God wins. Donald J. Trump LindellTV Mike Lindell Rudy W. Giuliani The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson ✝️ Emerald Robinson ✝️ Alison Steinberg Vanessa Broussard Dr. Maria Lauren Witzke Kristi Leigh Mike Crispi Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt The White House Rapid Response 47 Elon Musk General Mike Flynn Keith Kellogg Natalie Winters Bannon’s WarRoom Enrique Tarrio Jake Angeli-Chansley Jake Lang - January 6 Political Prisoner 🇺🇸 Alex Jones Owen Shroyer Benny Johnson Gunnery Sergeant Jessie Jane Duff Brandon Straka #WalkAway Philip Andertard

Cara Castronuova

310,193 次观看 • 1 年前

⚠️ ROGUE JUDGE BOASBERG JUST DECLARED WAR ON THE CONSTITUTION 🇺🇸 Let’s call it what it is: Judicial Insurrection. Judge James Boasberg, an Obama-era operative turned federal activist, just held President Donald J. Trump Trump’s administration in contempt—not for breaking the law, but for enforcing it. Why? Because they refused to re-import an MS-13 gang member with documented domestic abuse allegations, expelled to El Salvador under proper immigration law. This judge isn't seeking justice. He’s running a shadow government from the bench. Here's What Boasberg Did: 🔹 Overruled deportation orders 🔹 Demanded the return of a foreign criminal 🔹 Threatened contempt charges for upholding U.S. law 🔹 Defied prior Supreme Court precedent 🔹 Demanded daily updates like he’s a military commander This is not the role of a judge. This is the behavior of a tyrant in a robe. Where is Congress? The Founders gave Congress power to check judicial tyranny. Article III, Section 2 allows limiting federal court jurisdiction. The solution isn’t hypothetical—it’s in the Constitution. Congress has done it before. They can do it again. Speaker Speaker Mike Johnson —This Is Your Moment: 🛑 Strip jurisdiction from rogue courts like Boasberg’s 🛑 Tie court reform to reconciliation 🛑 Defund activist benches that obstruct the President 🛑 Protect Trump’s lawful authority to secure this nation This judge has crossed the red line. He’s not interpreting the law—he’s inventing it. He is defying the will of the American people, elevating foreign criminals over citizen safety, and weaponizing the robe to wage war against President Trump. Enough cowardice. Enough silence. Congress must act NOW or the judiciary will continue to act as the de facto ruling class—unaccountable, unelected, and unchecked. 🔥 This is not a legal dispute—it’s a constitutional crisis. President Trump is right: They hate him so much, they’ll burn the system down just to destroy him. But they’re not just attacking him… They’re attacking YOU.

Francois Leclerc

19,604 次观看 • 1 年前