正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Disqualifying Trump from office under Section III of the 14th Amendment doesn't undermine democracy—insurrection does that. The Framers of the 14th Amendment sought to protect democracy against violent attack—and our Supreme Court should too.

Rep. Jamie Raskin

943,720 subscribers

1,256,727 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Viva Frei 的头像

Viva Frei2 年前

You are the only ones who tried to overthrow a duly-elected President. ANE EVERYONE KNOWS IT, LIAR!

E 🇺🇸 的头像

E 🇺🇸2 年前

1. Zero charges for insurrection. 2. Why did you and your J6 committee fabricate a TV production to manipulate the American people? Why did you conspire with the FBI and the media? Why did you lie about the pipe bombs? Why did you destroy evidence?

AmericanRebel 的头像

AmericanRebel2 年前

Removing a candidate from the ballot is an act of insurrection and undermines democracy.

Radical Subtard 的头像

Radical Subtard2 年前

The first unarmed insurrection in history? Impressive.

Steve 🇺🇸 的头像

Steve 🇺🇸2 年前

The “Framers of the 14th Amendment” would have hated your guts.

Gimme3Steps 的头像

Gimme3Steps2 年前

Now do the 25th on this colostomy bag

Johnny Skidmark 的头像

Johnny Skidmark2 年前

You can’t disqualify Trump, you have no authority. Just because Nancy Pelosi claimed Jan 6th was an insurrection, doesn’t make it so. No one has been charged or convicted of an insurrection, and yes that is an actual charge, 18 U.S. Code § 2383.

LD Basler 的头像

LD Basler2 年前

Nobody, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON has been convicted of insurrection over the J/6 protest.. Sit down Jamie and grasp the reality that Trump is your 47th president 💯

Jim O'Connor 的头像

Jim O'Connor2 年前

Please show a conviction for insurrection.

USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸 的头像

USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸2 年前

Remove yourself immediately. Your oath means nothing. Trump has not been charged or convicted with insurrection.

相关视频

"It's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified." Rep Jamie Raskin Well, Raskin needs to refresh on the law. The 14th Amendment Section 3 doesn’t apply to the President (Trump). If you read Section 3 of the 14th Amendment nowhere does it mention that one cannot be President. ▫️Legal Interpretation: The presidency is not considered an “officer of the United States” under the amendment. Officers are appointed, the President is appointed elected. Therefore the 14th Amendment wouldn’t apply to the President as they’re not an Officer of the United States. ▫️Debate Topic: Whether January 6th qualifies as an “insurrection” and whether Trump’s actions meet the amendment’s requirements. ▫️Supreme Court Ruling: This section of the amendment does not apply to the presidency. This interpretation upholds Trump’s eligibility for office, ensuring his eventual ascension to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. 🔗🔗with more information in comments 👇🏻

"It's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified." Rep Jamie Raskin Well, Raskin needs to refresh on the law. The 14th Amendment Section 3 doesn’t apply to the President (Trump). If you read Section 3 of the 14th Amendment nowhere does it mention that one cannot be President. ▫️Legal Interpretation: The presidency is not considered an “officer of the United States” under the amendment. Officers are appointed, the President is appointed elected. Therefore the 14th Amendment wouldn’t apply to the President as they’re not an Officer of the United States. ▫️Debate Topic: Whether January 6th qualifies as an “insurrection” and whether Trump’s actions meet the amendment’s requirements. ▫️Supreme Court Ruling: This section of the amendment does not apply to the presidency. This interpretation upholds Trump’s eligibility for office, ensuring his eventual ascension to the presidency as the 47th President of the United States. 🔗🔗with more information in comments 👇🏻

❥❥❥ᗰoᒪᒪie❥❥❥

66,537 次观看 • 1 年前

“America’s crisis of democracy, sadly, is far from over.” This is how I ended my final MSNBC opening monologue tonight, as I discussed the forthcoming Supreme Court/14th Amendment Trump case. Watch:

“America’s crisis of democracy, sadly, is far from over.” This is how I ended my final MSNBC opening monologue tonight, as I discussed the forthcoming Supreme Court/14th Amendment Trump case. Watch:

Mehdi Hasan

829,303 次观看 • 2 年前

Mainstream media outlet The Hill is calling for an insurrection, demanding that Congress use the 14th Amendment to block Donald Trump from taking office in January. They claim Congress has the authority to override the Electoral College and "restore power to democracy." Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin has previously stated that Congress would use the 14th Amendment to stop Trump on January 6, even if it led to "civil war conditions."

Mainstream media outlet The Hill is calling for an insurrection, demanding that Congress use the 14th Amendment to block Donald Trump from taking office in January. They claim Congress has the authority to override the Electoral College and "restore power to democracy." Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin has previously stated that Congress would use the 14th Amendment to stop Trump on January 6, even if it led to "civil war conditions."

Shadow of Ezra

275,890 次观看 • 1 年前

Section III of the 14th Amdt bars insurrectionists from federal office. CO courts affirmed the House of Reps. & a Senate majority in finding that Trump incited the 1/6 insurrection. If an insurrectionist president isn't disqualified from holding office under Section III, who is?

Section III of the 14th Amdt bars insurrectionists from federal office. CO courts affirmed the House of Reps. & a Senate majority in finding that Trump incited the 1/6 insurrection. If an insurrectionist president isn't disqualified from holding office under Section III, who is?

Rep. Jamie Raskin

337,549 次观看 • 2 年前

JUST IN: President Biden refuses to condemn the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to ban Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment and says Trump "absolutely" supported an insurrection. The U.S. looks more and more like Communist China by the day. The comment from Biden came after a reporter asked about the Colorado Supreme Court's decision. Biden said there is "no question" Trump supported an insurrection and said he was fine with letting "the court make that decision" on if the 14th Amendment applies. Video: RNC Research

JUST IN: President Biden refuses to condemn the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to ban Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment and says Trump "absolutely" supported an insurrection. The U.S. looks more and more like Communist China by the day. The comment from Biden came after a reporter asked about the Colorado Supreme Court's decision. Biden said there is "no question" Trump supported an insurrection and said he was fine with letting "the court make that decision" on if the 14th Amendment applies. Video: RNC Research

Collin Rugg

952,506 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨#BREAKING: Colorado Supreme Court had just ruled that Donald Trump is disqualified from serving as president under 14th Amendment

🚨#BREAKING: Colorado Supreme Court had just ruled that Donald Trump is disqualified from serving as president under 14th Amendment

R A W S A L E R T S

1,696,606 次观看 • 2 年前

Isn’t fraudulently using the 14th Amendment/falsely accusing Donald J. Trump of insurrection to keep him off the ballot insurrection in itself?

Isn’t fraudulently using the 14th Amendment/falsely accusing Donald J. Trump of insurrection to keep him off the ballot insurrection in itself?

Tom Fitton

785,207 次观看 • 2 年前

Cecilia Wang’s argument in front of the Supreme Court lays it plain: President Trump is no match for the 14th Amendment.

Cecilia Wang’s argument in front of the Supreme Court lays it plain: President Trump is no match for the 14th Amendment.

Cory Booker

22,531 次观看 • 4 个月前

White House spox Abigail Jackson: "The administration feels that the Supreme Court has fundamentally misinterpreted the intent of the 14th Amendment"

White House spox Abigail Jackson: "The administration feels that the Supreme Court has fundamentally misinterpreted the intent of the 14th Amendment"

Aaron Rupar

42,346 次观看 • 1 个月前

To debunk MAGA’s “insurrectionist” theory of the 2nd Amendment, just read the Constitution. Everywhere it rejects insurrection, including in the 14th Amendment which bans insurrectionists from ever holding office again. The Constitution does not provide for its own destruction.

To debunk MAGA’s “insurrectionist” theory of the 2nd Amendment, just read the Constitution. Everywhere it rejects insurrection, including in the 14th Amendment which bans insurrectionists from ever holding office again. The Constitution does not provide for its own destruction.

Rep. Jamie Raskin

558,810 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨🚨🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Not only did a Colorado court BAR Trump from running in 2024, they ruled he “engaged in insurrection.” Here are the details: The court ruled Trump incited the riot at the US Capitol Building in an effort to overturn the result after he lost the US election in 2020. “A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision. It marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate. There are DOZENS of states with similar cases before the courts. Do you agree EVERY state should follow Colorado’s lead?

🚨🚨🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Not only did a Colorado court BAR Trump from running in 2024, they ruled he “engaged in insurrection.” Here are the details: The court ruled Trump incited the riot at the US Capitol Building in an effort to overturn the result after he lost the US election in 2020. “A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision. It marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate. There are DOZENS of states with similar cases before the courts. Do you agree EVERY state should follow Colorado’s lead?

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,421,367 次观看 • 2 年前

Trump speaks on the Supreme Court ruling and clearly explains how Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment was meant for the babies of slaves. Meaning Foundational Black Americans. #FBA

Trump speaks on the Supreme Court ruling and clearly explains how Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment was meant for the babies of slaves. Meaning Foundational Black Americans. #FBA

Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸

464,583 次观看 • 1 年前

.Tom Fitton: The Left doesn’t want you to know the truth about what the 14th Amendment says. It does not require granting citizenship to children of illegal aliens, and the Supreme Court hasn’t interpreted it that way.

.Tom Fitton: The Left doesn’t want you to know the truth about what the 14th Amendment says. It does not require granting citizenship to children of illegal aliens, and the Supreme Court hasn’t interpreted it that way.

Judicial Watch ⚖️

10,728 次观看 • 4 个月前

Protesters assembled to demand Congress invoke the 14th Amendment to remove Trump from office as an "insurrectionist."

Protesters assembled to demand Congress invoke the 14th Amendment to remove Trump from office as an "insurrectionist."

🔥⭐️Edwin⭐️🔥

26,445 次观看 • 1 年前

Yes, Donald Trump is disqualified from running for office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. No, this provision doesn’t require a criminal conviction. Chief election officials in the states have a constitutional duty to keep Trump off the ballot in 2024.

Yes, Donald Trump is disqualified from running for office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. No, this provision doesn’t require a criminal conviction. Chief election officials in the states have a constitutional duty to keep Trump off the ballot in 2024.

Robert Reich

310,767 次观看 • 3 年前

Mike Davis Goes SCORCHED EARTH on The Supreme Court for Effectively Eliminating US Citizenship: "All 9 Billion People on Earth are now Undocumented Americans!" "This is as bad of a decision as you can get." "If the 14th Amendment did not apply to American Indians who lived here for thousands of years, how on earth does it apply to every illegal alien including Chinese birth tourists!?" "This is the most egregious violation imaginable of 'We the People', the sovereign citizens of America, of our most crucial sovereign power to control our border and our populous." "Framers of the 14th Amendment are CLEAR that it does not apply to visiting foreigners"

Mike Davis Goes SCORCHED EARTH on The Supreme Court for Effectively Eliminating US Citizenship: "All 9 Billion People on Earth are now Undocumented Americans!" "This is as bad of a decision as you can get." "If the 14th Amendment did not apply to American Indians who lived here for thousands of years, how on earth does it apply to every illegal alien including Chinese birth tourists!?" "This is the most egregious violation imaginable of 'We the People', the sovereign citizens of America, of our most crucial sovereign power to control our border and our populous." "Framers of the 14th Amendment are CLEAR that it does not apply to visiting foreigners"

Benny Johnson

156,357 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨BREAKING: TRUMP EXCORIATES SUPREME COURT FOR BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP & TARIFF RULINGS “TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS!” THE 14TH AMENDMENT WAS NEVER MEANT FOR THIS 🔥🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING: TRUMP EXCORIATES SUPREME COURT FOR BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP & TARIFF RULINGS “TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS!” THE 14TH AMENDMENT WAS NEVER MEANT FOR THIS 🔥🇺🇸

Stand Up For Truth 🇺🇸

16,513 次观看 • 19 天前

Watch this. The conservative former Arkansas governor says not only is Trump "morally disqualified" but also "he may be disqualified under the 14th Amendment from being president again as a result of the insurrection."

Watch this. The conservative former Arkansas governor says not only is Trump "morally disqualified" but also "he may be disqualified under the 14th Amendment from being president again as a result of the insurrection."

Robert Reich

82,558 次观看 • 3 年前