正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

District Councillor kicked out for labelling a policy ‘racist’… “We have a procurement policy (quoting policy) which is weighted towards iwi. If you have Maori staff or you’re an iwi affiliated company, they gave you a 5% weighting to get a job. So if it’s a $10 million job…that’s... show more

REALITY CHECK RADIO

11,985 subscribers

13,343 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Mace: If you are able-bodied, my policy is you should get a job and work for the United States… when people get on the government dole—when they find these programs, they live off of them—they don’t have the incentive to be a productive member of society

Mace: If you are able-bodied, my policy is you should get a job and work for the United States… when people get on the government dole—when they find these programs, they live off of them—they don’t have the incentive to be a productive member of society

Acyn

313,666 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨Andrew Tate explains exactly why women should never be given a job they have to get right the first time 😳 "You can't give women a job that they have to get right the first time. Like fly a plane." "Ask a man to do it." 💀

🚨Andrew Tate explains exactly why women should never be given a job they have to get right the first time 😳 "You can't give women a job that they have to get right the first time. Like fly a plane." "Ask a man to do it." 💀

The Tate Motive

23,385 次观看 • 3 个月前

Abdul El-Sayed: “If you’re out of a job, it’s probably because a corporation figured out how to automate your job. If you’re out of a home, it’s probably because a corporation is speculating on the home that you should have been able to afford. If you’re out of healthcare, it’s probably because a corporation has figured out how to monetize you because you get sick”

Abdul El-Sayed: “If you’re out of a job, it’s probably because a corporation figured out how to automate your job. If you’re out of a home, it’s probably because a corporation is speculating on the home that you should have been able to afford. If you’re out of healthcare, it’s probably because a corporation has figured out how to monetize you because you get sick”

Marco Foster

605,031 次观看 • 4 个月前

Hi Paul Murray The job appears to be advertised at 89k - 104k, with a minimum of 5 years experience. How much do you think a qualified Arborist should be paid? Should they be paid less if they work for a council? What qualifications do you have, and how much do you get paid? Kenny x

Hi Paul Murray The job appears to be advertised at 89k - 104k, with a minimum of 5 years experience. How much do you think a qualified Arborist should be paid? Should they be paid less if they work for a council? What qualifications do you have, and how much do you get paid? Kenny x

Kenny Devine

13,193 次观看 • 1 年前

If you’re a school, a trust or a council that wants to open a new special needs school… … you don’t know the policy, the budget, or if you’ll be able to open at all. Families deserve better than this. Bridget Phillipson’s Education Department is a mess.

If you’re a school, a trust or a council that wants to open a new special needs school… … you don’t know the policy, the budget, or if you’ll be able to open at all. Families deserve better than this. Bridget Phillipson’s Education Department is a mess.

Nick Timothy MP

14,641 次观看 • 8 个月前

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: When asked to rate Chandrababu Naidu’s tenures after bifurcation in terms of economic development, YSRCP leader and former Andhra Finance Minister Buggana Rajendranath says, “If it comes to giving a number score for what they have done, I would give zero—not even one. I am looking at a comparison of both tenures. The last tenure was a disaster, and this one is an even bigger disaster. The 2014–19 period was a disaster because you did not have any proper policy. You did not have a policy for the growth of the state. You did not have a proper policy in any single direction, which actually gave any output or result. You had a policy of just abruptly leaving Hyderabad at midnight, shifting somewhere else, and trying to establish yourself in a place that was explicitly advised against. You did not have a coherent policy in any one direction…”

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: When asked to rate Chandrababu Naidu’s tenures after bifurcation in terms of economic development, YSRCP leader and former Andhra Finance Minister Buggana Rajendranath says, “If it comes to giving a number score for what they have done, I would give zero—not even one. I am looking at a comparison of both tenures. The last tenure was a disaster, and this one is an even bigger disaster. The 2014–19 period was a disaster because you did not have any proper policy. You did not have a policy for the growth of the state. You did not have a proper policy in any single direction, which actually gave any output or result. You had a policy of just abruptly leaving Hyderabad at midnight, shifting somewhere else, and trying to establish yourself in a place that was explicitly advised against. You did not have a coherent policy in any one direction…”

ANI

45,047 次观看 • 2 个月前

We need to revamp SNAP Now's the chance to Make America healthy again. “…If you’re on the SNAP program, you shouldn’t just get a card, it’s like giving a teenager with no responsibility a credit card, they are going to max it out. You don’t give somebody who doesn’t have a job, or is incapable of keeping employment, a card to buy what ever they want…”

We need to revamp SNAP Now's the chance to Make America healthy again. “…If you’re on the SNAP program, you shouldn’t just get a card, it’s like giving a teenager with no responsibility a credit card, they are going to max it out. You don’t give somebody who doesn’t have a job, or is incapable of keeping employment, a card to buy what ever they want…”

Farm Girl Carrie 👩‍🌾

41,376 次观看 • 9 个月前

Some millennials have been working for 20 years and are still confused by corporate 😂 For those who are still in the dark let me fill you in. Your performance doesn't matter. Your performance review doesn't matter. Your compensation has been set by a budget committee a year ago. You are not "overachieving" anything. Management has a fixed pool of money to pay the people they manage so they can give them raises less than inflation. If they give you more money, they have to give someone else less money. It's a zero-sum game. Managers actually have a larger pool of money to hire new employees because corporations recognize that new hires need to be incentivized to come over. They won't just leave their company for the same money. If you've been at the same company for 5 years you are underpaid. If you've been at the same company for 10 years you are paid less than a new hire at a competitor. Loyalty doesn't matter because there is no reason for a company to voluntarily pay you more money. Corporations already know that over 95% of employees will not go anywhere and will take whatever they get. Even if that's nothing. There's no reason to pay everybody more money when only a tiny percentage of workers will leave. Even if you leave... (remember over 95% of employees will not) ... the corporation will distribute the work you were doing among all your coworkers. And they will take on the extra work. And they will stay. For nothing. Because in addition to a salary, what an employee wants is to not have to look for a new job. That's all the want. They don't want to move anywhere. And companies know it, and they will take advantage of that. Now you know! You're welcome.

Some millennials have been working for 20 years and are still confused by corporate 😂 For those who are still in the dark let me fill you in. Your performance doesn't matter. Your performance review doesn't matter. Your compensation has been set by a budget committee a year ago. You are not "overachieving" anything. Management has a fixed pool of money to pay the people they manage so they can give them raises less than inflation. If they give you more money, they have to give someone else less money. It's a zero-sum game. Managers actually have a larger pool of money to hire new employees because corporations recognize that new hires need to be incentivized to come over. They won't just leave their company for the same money. If you've been at the same company for 5 years you are underpaid. If you've been at the same company for 10 years you are paid less than a new hire at a competitor. Loyalty doesn't matter because there is no reason for a company to voluntarily pay you more money. Corporations already know that over 95% of employees will not go anywhere and will take whatever they get. Even if that's nothing. There's no reason to pay everybody more money when only a tiny percentage of workers will leave. Even if you leave... (remember over 95% of employees will not) ... the corporation will distribute the work you were doing among all your coworkers. And they will take on the extra work. And they will stay. For nothing. Because in addition to a salary, what an employee wants is to not have to look for a new job. That's all the want. They don't want to move anywhere. And companies know it, and they will take advantage of that. Now you know! You're welcome.

Lazy Canadian Investor

66,816 次观看 • 2 年前

Union operator reveals private company offered him $235,000 to leave his $125,000 union job and he almost said no over dental “I make 115, 125,000 a year being the union, and the private company's going to pay me about 235, 245.” “In what world is health insurance worth $100,000?” “Go buy a health insurance policy.” “They do. They offer it. But you're going to have to pay for it, but that's fine. It'll come out of your paycheck.” “That's at the new company if you take the $250,000 job.” “Yes, that's correct. Yeah. So, what's there to be stressed about?” “For $100,000 a year? You can buy a dentist and have him stay in your home.” “The negatives about a union is they teach you, they brainwash you that the union is all encompassing and they are your provider and that's all bull crap. The union is really good at some things and being in a union many times is a good thing, but not if you emotionally accept that somehow it's worth that you should take a $100,000 year pay cut for dental.” “In the meantime, you will have made an extra $100,000 a year. $8,333 a month, $2,000 a week more money. That's a lot of dental.”

Union operator reveals private company offered him $235,000 to leave his $125,000 union job and he almost said no over dental “I make 115, 125,000 a year being the union, and the private company's going to pay me about 235, 245.” “In what world is health insurance worth $100,000?” “Go buy a health insurance policy.” “They do. They offer it. But you're going to have to pay for it, but that's fine. It'll come out of your paycheck.” “That's at the new company if you take the $250,000 job.” “Yes, that's correct. Yeah. So, what's there to be stressed about?” “For $100,000 a year? You can buy a dentist and have him stay in your home.” “The negatives about a union is they teach you, they brainwash you that the union is all encompassing and they are your provider and that's all bull crap. The union is really good at some things and being in a union many times is a good thing, but not if you emotionally accept that somehow it's worth that you should take a $100,000 year pay cut for dental.” “In the meantime, you will have made an extra $100,000 a year. $8,333 a month, $2,000 a week more money. That's a lot of dental.”

ramagazzi

313,109 次观看 • 1 个月前

“He’s lucky he has a job… If you told a regular Stoolie that you get a 25K free bet and all you have to do is be in Chicago at noon on Sunday they would be here 100 times out of 100” -Big Cat

“He’s lucky he has a job… If you told a regular Stoolie that you get a 25K free bet and all you have to do is be in Chicago at noon on Sunday they would be here 100 times out of 100” -Big Cat

Viva La Stool

1,348,336 次观看 • 1 年前

'You're simply announcing a policy that is already in place because you think it's a crowd pleaser.' Susanna Reid Jeremy Hunt says they 'do have the legal framework to impose those sanctions, the question is whether that actually happens.' The Chancellor will later announce people on state benefits could have their payments reduced if they fail to look for work or refuse a job offer.

'You're simply announcing a policy that is already in place because you think it's a crowd pleaser.' Susanna Reid Jeremy Hunt says they 'do have the legal framework to impose those sanctions, the question is whether that actually happens.' The Chancellor will later announce people on state benefits could have their payments reduced if they fail to look for work or refuse a job offer.

Good Morning Britain

1,140,419 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨ELON MUSK: "I never originally intended to start a company. I tried to get a job at Netscape after graduating from Penn. Marc Andreessen is a friend of mine but they didn't respond to my resume that I mailed in. I thought 'I guess I'll just write some internet software' and wrote the first maps and directions on the internet in 1995. It was just really because nobody would give me a job on the internet. If they gave me a job, I guess I would have just worked at Netscape or something."

🚨ELON MUSK: "I never originally intended to start a company. I tried to get a job at Netscape after graduating from Penn. Marc Andreessen is a friend of mine but they didn't respond to my resume that I mailed in. I thought 'I guess I'll just write some internet software' and wrote the first maps and directions on the internet in 1995. It was just really because nobody would give me a job on the internet. If they gave me a job, I guess I would have just worked at Netscape or something."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,681,062 次观看 • 1 年前

"It says so much about your negotiation skills, but also your character as a leader. You consciously agreed to a policy which you knew would worsen relations between Crown & Iwi in NZ” Q+A’s Jack Tame exposes the truth behind Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s negotiations with David Seymour over his Treaty Principles Bill. #nzpol

"It says so much about your negotiation skills, but also your character as a leader. You consciously agreed to a policy which you knew would worsen relations between Crown & Iwi in NZ” Q+A’s Jack Tame exposes the truth behind Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s negotiations with David Seymour over his Treaty Principles Bill. #nzpol

Kelvin Morgan 🇳🇿

13,186 次观看 • 1 年前

Canadian FM Anita Anand announces a reversal in Canada's foreign policy towards China. Q: "You called China a 'global disruptive power.' Do you still believe that's the case or has your language around China softened?" A: "This is a new government with a new Prime Minister, a new foreign policy and a new geopolitical environment." "It is necessary for us to diversify our trading partners and to grow non-US trade by at least 50% over the next 10 years."

Canadian FM Anita Anand announces a reversal in Canada's foreign policy towards China. Q: "You called China a 'global disruptive power.' Do you still believe that's the case or has your language around China softened?" A: "This is a new government with a new Prime Minister, a new foreign policy and a new geopolitical environment." "It is necessary for us to diversify our trading partners and to grow non-US trade by at least 50% over the next 10 years."

Harrison Faulkner

395,517 次观看 • 7 个月前

You can be a great team with resources that rank in the middle of your conference. You can take a job and have success at a school in which the administration has higher expectations than they give you resources. The reality is, it is difficult to get any head coaching position, especially for those looking for their first. First time head coaches usually aren’t getting max resourced jobs in high school, college, or in the pros. The resource excuse is often a crutch for coaches: “We didn’t beat them because they have more.” “How are we suppose to win with our facilities?” “We travel in vans. They travel charter; they are more well-rested and prepared.” When deciding whether to apply for, go through the hiring process, and ultimately, making the decision to accept a new position, coaches should ask themselves three questions: 1. “Is my new administration open-minded to finding creative solutions to bridging the resource gaps so we can provide the best experience for our student-athletes?” -Creating revenue: My current athletic director David Spafford has taught me a lot about revenue creation in athletics. There are a lot of ways to bridge the budget gap including fundraising, corporate sponsorships, ticket sales, facility rentals, camps, and much more. The possibilities are endless. If you are looking at a position where the allocated resources aren’t where they need to be to compete then ask yourself if you’re the right person to help create revenue. You’ll see a job where the previous 10 years yielded multiple coaches and no success. Then one coach comes in and turns everything around without a change to the allocated resources. Chances are, the new coach is a better fit for the job than prior coaches. They usually arrive with a bag full of creative solutions and positive energy to move the program forward. If you don’t have budget money for post-workout nutrition for your student-athletes then go raise money. If you need a new weight room then go talk to corporate sponsors around the community about giving X amount of dollars annually for the next 10 years. Get an architectural rendering. Go out and show the community what is needed, why it benefits them and others. Remember, actual coaching is a small percentage of the job. Building a program is so much more. 2. “What do I need as a coach for success, what are my non-negotiables, and does this position provide them so I can help the school, program, and student-athletes achieve success?” -Every coach needs talented players, but it’s more than that. Style of play is really important for each coach. Does the job you’re considering allow you to work with and develop the type of athlete you need to be successful. Some coaches are flexible in working with different leadership styles, many are not. Can you handle an athletic director who micro-manages or who can and will blow up on you? Do you prefer a more hands-off AD? What kind of boss do you need and does the job provide it? Make a list of 3-5 non-negotiables. Does the job have them? If they don’t then you already know your answer. The job has to line up with your core values. 3. “Can we compete towards the top third of the conference if I am the head coach at this job?” -The quality of every job is ultimately on a sliding scale based on how good the conference is. Maybe the job you are considering is poorly-resourced but it’s also in a weak conference. This is the type of job you should consider taking. The jobs you need to avoid are the worst jobs within the best leagues. You can take and find success in a low-resourced positions if the league is just ok. However, there is minimal pathway to success if you’re in the best league and at an under-resourced school. If you do catch lighting in a bottle, there won’t be sustainability with this set up.

You can be a great team with resources that rank in the middle of your conference. You can take a job and have success at a school in which the administration has higher expectations than they give you resources. The reality is, it is difficult to get any head coaching position, especially for those looking for their first. First time head coaches usually aren’t getting max resourced jobs in high school, college, or in the pros. The resource excuse is often a crutch for coaches: “We didn’t beat them because they have more.” “How are we suppose to win with our facilities?” “We travel in vans. They travel charter; they are more well-rested and prepared.” When deciding whether to apply for, go through the hiring process, and ultimately, making the decision to accept a new position, coaches should ask themselves three questions: 1. “Is my new administration open-minded to finding creative solutions to bridging the resource gaps so we can provide the best experience for our student-athletes?” -Creating revenue: My current athletic director David Spafford has taught me a lot about revenue creation in athletics. There are a lot of ways to bridge the budget gap including fundraising, corporate sponsorships, ticket sales, facility rentals, camps, and much more. The possibilities are endless. If you are looking at a position where the allocated resources aren’t where they need to be to compete then ask yourself if you’re the right person to help create revenue. You’ll see a job where the previous 10 years yielded multiple coaches and no success. Then one coach comes in and turns everything around without a change to the allocated resources. Chances are, the new coach is a better fit for the job than prior coaches. They usually arrive with a bag full of creative solutions and positive energy to move the program forward. If you don’t have budget money for post-workout nutrition for your student-athletes then go raise money. If you need a new weight room then go talk to corporate sponsors around the community about giving X amount of dollars annually for the next 10 years. Get an architectural rendering. Go out and show the community what is needed, why it benefits them and others. Remember, actual coaching is a small percentage of the job. Building a program is so much more. 2. “What do I need as a coach for success, what are my non-negotiables, and does this position provide them so I can help the school, program, and student-athletes achieve success?” -Every coach needs talented players, but it’s more than that. Style of play is really important for each coach. Does the job you’re considering allow you to work with and develop the type of athlete you need to be successful. Some coaches are flexible in working with different leadership styles, many are not. Can you handle an athletic director who micro-manages or who can and will blow up on you? Do you prefer a more hands-off AD? What kind of boss do you need and does the job provide it? Make a list of 3-5 non-negotiables. Does the job have them? If they don’t then you already know your answer. The job has to line up with your core values. 3. “Can we compete towards the top third of the conference if I am the head coach at this job?” -The quality of every job is ultimately on a sliding scale based on how good the conference is. Maybe the job you are considering is poorly-resourced but it’s also in a weak conference. This is the type of job you should consider taking. The jobs you need to avoid are the worst jobs within the best leagues. You can take and find success in a low-resourced positions if the league is just ok. However, there is minimal pathway to success if you’re in the best league and at an under-resourced school. If you do catch lighting in a bottle, there won’t be sustainability with this set up.

Craig Doty

276,614 次观看 • 2 年前

Jez breaks down his advice to new traders “If your portfolio is sub $10k, get a job. If you make $50k, that’s a 500% return. It sucks but that’s such a good trade” “If you have $100k, you can full port into anything. If you have the stamina and determination to sit for a month, something will eventually come up”

Jez breaks down his advice to new traders “If your portfolio is sub $10k, get a job. If you make $50k, that’s a 500% return. It sucks but that’s such a good trade” “If you have $100k, you can full port into anything. If you have the stamina and determination to sit for a month, something will eventually come up”

Jack

153,809 次观看 • 11 个月前

"If you don't roll up your sleeves in the Age of AI and AI for GTM Agents, you will be out of a job. You have to deploy at least the first few yourself. You can't just hire a bunch of agenices. At least the first AI agent." with Kyle Norton CRO Owner

"If you don't roll up your sleeves in the Age of AI and AI for GTM Agents, you will be out of a job. You have to deploy at least the first few yourself. You can't just hire a bunch of agenices. At least the first AI agent." with Kyle Norton CRO Owner

Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin

12,461 次观看 • 7 个月前

"This is about more than policy disagreements. This is about if you get a phone call at 3:00AM and there is a national security emergency, does the person who is answering the phone have the mental ability to do the job? If the answer is 'no,' then all of us have been defrauded."

"This is about more than policy disagreements. This is about if you get a phone call at 3:00AM and there is a national security emergency, does the person who is answering the phone have the mental ability to do the job? If the answer is 'no,' then all of us have been defrauded."

Thomas Hern

12,250 次观看 • 11 个月前