Do you agree with her???

50-50 custody and then the girl asked who pays for the kid when they are at the moms the majority of the time. What? She doesnt even know basic math.

No the woman should have to pay for the child while the child is at the man's house. Make these insufferable feminists argue against their own points by flipping it on them like that. ☝🏼

You’re about to start a war

The woman she's talking with doesn't understand 50/50. She even says with her last comment 'when the child spends the majority with the mother" That isn't 50/50. Some people either don't listen or don't comprehend when they are in a conversation.

What part of 50-50 is so hard to understand for this person? She constantly says things like " the woman has to take all the childcare responsibilities" and "the kid is the majority at the mothers house"... All she heard was "no child support" and went into full bs argument mode

The concept of 50-50 is usually lost on most women...until it's time for divorce.

Why the fuck can’t she understand 50:50 custody?

She doesn’t think in reality she just pushes ideologies she thinks makes her appear superior - in reality her way the child suffers - she has not put the kids best interest at her forefront of her ideas and that is abundantly clear

Well… I could argue she’s putting the child’s interest at heart where she’s underlying-Lu saying “don’t divorce raise the kid together as a family”. Most of her takes have nuances where she’s mostly challenging the poor choices made by divorcees inspite of their children and partners

Do you have a child? This gets to me because some people cannot even fathom how dangerous some men can be, they don’t even comprehend that that you as the mom won’t even tell your story - so many people have told me “tell your story. You should do a podcast” and I say to them you don’t get it - genuine fear means you won’t do a single thing to incur more - I have so much legal debt that I could ask for help but I don’t because it would mean telling my story and even that would put my child in danger - and ignorant childless women think they have a right to say women should stay with the father or be punished for leaving- well those men actually do punish you and the child for leaving - she’s ignorant and insulting to women and children

There are intricacies to these conversations… of course, no one should stay in an unhealthy and dangerous relationship because of their kids…

It’s not even about staying in the relationship - do you think a sadistic person stops being sadistic because you left? They get worse- like a constant ticking bomb - you can try as much collaboration and being a saint yourself but if you don’t give them the response they want they will use the child - sick people like that hear Pearl and feel justified in causing harm and disregarding boundaries. Ignorance on her level causes harm - she is hateful and no one hateful can put a child first- she’s the exact person who would force a child to stay with the father regardless of the reality and purely based on her pick me ideologies - look at the actual reality of single fathers - sure there are beautiful exceptions but it’s about 1%

@better_men Either way, woman a job and she should also contribute. If you care about the child as much as you claim, you will certainly contribute as well. Relationships end for many reasons. It happens.

If we talking about me personally then yes I have been the sole financial provider and caretaker -What actually happens in reality is the woman provides everything (this is based on real life examples of real people) - problem is people see NFL stars paying and they think that’s the norm for average people - it’s not - the norm is single mothers providing everything.

that last line was a bar woah

True that

Its crazy the one chick cant get her head rapped around 50/50. Whats so hard to understand half the week with dad, not most with mom. Catch up sweety.

Should the mom pay for the 50% of the time when the child is with the father? That is the same answer you should give for the father when the child is with the mother? 50/50 custody solves these problems quite easily.

Why complicate things. Divorce should not be allowed. Make better choices before you get married.

That part… that’s what I hear. If you make better choices, chances of a divorce a reduced to the almost zero because issues can always be worked out (except of course abuse, borderline NPD & cheating).

@thrivenex even abuse, cheating and mental illnesses have red flags early on and can be prevented with the right approach. so if they ignored the signs and didn't do the right things to prevent bad things from happening then they should sleep in the bed they made

@better_men Agreed, In some cases, the law should enforce measures against abuse. Why was the divorce rate 10% a century ago but 50% now? What's the point of marriage if 50% fail? No company could function with a 50% failure rate. Fix it or stop it.

@Erockn1988 @better_men It was 10% bc women couldn't file for divorce! They couldn't have a credit card until the 1970s They were told that if he got mad and hit you, then you need to figure out what you did wrong so you don't upset him again Learn history before you speak and you'll sound less ignorant

@Erockn1988 @better_men In 2025, laws allow calling the police for family violence, and the perpetrator may face jail. I'm saying divorce to not be permitted, except in cases of law-breaking, such as violence.

if you would break down woman's logic, you would realize that they are retards and when you realize how they see the world and how the whole decision making works in their heads, you would never give them any authority without strong males provision.

AGREED

BACK AT YOU KEEP WAKING THEM UP

Child support is scam

Well, if she asked for divorce without anything done wrong to her - that's her freedom to choose. But freedom also means responsibility for your choices in life. Financial responsibilities too.

I agree that 50/50 custody should be the norm, with both having children half of the time and sharing all expenses. This stupid thing that mothers get the children most of the time and child support, while fathers are unable to see their children is not OK!

I always appreciate that these ladies view their time with their kids as worth of compensation but not the father’s.

It's as if she heard "50-50," but somewhere in the slow moving gears in her brain, she interpreted it as 99%. She asked, what was it? 3 or 4 times "If the woman has the kid the majority of the time.." 50-50 isn't the majority, lady! It's half. It's freaking half!

As much as I dislike pearl, she has stumbled upon a point here most womens idea of taking care of the kid in any capacity is dependent on financial support from thier ex or the government. It has never crossed thier minds that they are equally responsible to support thier kids.

Some of what she says, I do agree with and some of it I don’t. There are a lot of nuances that she’s not talking about in this particular clip that have to be accounted for such as domestic violence and other abuses that go on in relationships. However, if we’re talking a normal relationship where things aren’t working out for one partner and they get a divorce then that’s different. The woman in green(Pearl) makes a lot of sense. The blonde haired woman kept trying to misunderstand her saying 50-50. She even says “ when the child is majority at the mother’s house”. If it’s 50-50, then the child is at both parents house equally so in that instance, I don’t believe in child support or alimony. The parent should still be able to coparent and work together financially in a 50-50 way.

Does any man actually want the black top wearing type 🤢

@Yoyo41444911111 You’d be surprised 🤣🤣🤣

The girl in the black top isn’t academically capable of having this kind of conversation 🤦🏻😂

The blonde is showing selective hearing. The brunette keeps saying 50/50 custody which obviously means he pays for the kid when he has the kid. Prime example of SOME women wanting ownership but not responsibility.

50/50 custody doesn’t mean that the woman has the kid for the “majority of the time” as the interviewer asserted.

I could not converse with the lady in black. She listens to respond, not understand. 50/50 is a simple concept.. smh

No fault divorce with women getting child support is the work of the devil. Marriage is hard and this creates a free pass with money incentives. Add also the “kids are resilient” lie; we won’t need that many shrinks if kids were.

Modern entitled parasites assume if they break a fundamental contract, they should be subsidized/rewarded for it. And then people wonder why fewer and fewer men are getting married: it's because it's the most efficient means of resource extraction and men are done.

Parenting should be split 50/50 with each parent supporting the child equally and time spent with each parent equally. Period. No one should be paying child support.

If the kid is with the father 2 weeks out of the month, why would the child be spending more time at the mother's? Make it make sense..

Someone should explain what 50-50 means to this dingbat.

Yup. Child support is a scam. Kids need their fathers and women who take money are a joke.

The majority of the time??? Its 50-50 stupid women. Its cash you're after...you don't give a shit about the kid do you. Just money..