正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

DO YOU STILL THINK HE'D MAKE A GOOD PRESIDENT? In this rapid fire interview Jon Ossoff says does not support medicare for all, abolishing ice or expanding the supreme court.

Lovable Liberal and his Old English sheepdog

79,876 subscribers

12,531 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

WATCH: “Leader” Hakeem Jeffries (D) says he does NOT support abolishing ICE or Medicare for All 🤔

WATCH: “Leader” Hakeem Jeffries (D) says he does NOT support abolishing ICE or Medicare for All 🤔

The Tennessee Holler

126,881 次观看 • 13 天前

🚨 Democrats Keep Embracing The RADICAL Left Rob Bluey: "They embraced all of the radical policy positions—expanding the Supreme Court, Medicare for All, abolishing ICE. You can go down the list."

🚨 Democrats Keep Embracing The RADICAL Left Rob Bluey: "They embraced all of the radical policy positions—expanding the Supreme Court, Medicare for All, abolishing ICE. You can go down the list."

Laura Ingraham

48,550 次观看 • 1 个月前

Abdul El-Sayed claims he's not a socialist while calling for socialist government-run healthcare. CNN: The positions that you've had on Medicare for All or abolishing ICE, what do you think that looks like going forward? EL-SAYED: "I'm not a socialist, but I am a scientist."

Abdul El-Sayed claims he's not a socialist while calling for socialist government-run healthcare. CNN: The positions that you've had on Medicare for All or abolishing ICE, what do you think that looks like going forward? EL-SAYED: "I'm not a socialist, but I am a scientist."

RNC Research

26,629 次观看 • 24 天前

Abdul El-Sayed — who still claims he is not a socialist — wants to abolish ICE and pass government-funded Medicare for All: "Standing up to the corporate monopolies, 'oligopolies'...guaranteeing healthcare to every single person in this country... abolishing ICE."

Abdul El-Sayed — who still claims he is not a socialist — wants to abolish ICE and pass government-funded Medicare for All: "Standing up to the corporate monopolies, 'oligopolies'...guaranteeing healthcare to every single person in this country... abolishing ICE."

RNC Research

15,050 次观看 • 29 天前

O’Leary: It would have been better on a practical basis to have not done this I think… Hunt: The Supreme Court or the President? O’Leary: The Supreme Court! They caused a nightmare. What am I supposed to do next?

O’Leary: It would have been better on a practical basis to have not done this I think… Hunt: The Supreme Court or the President? O’Leary: The Supreme Court! They caused a nightmare. What am I supposed to do next?

Acyn

64,066 次观看 • 6 个月前

REP. TLAIB: "This unhinged Supreme Court can make all these decisions, but we're not going anywhere...The President...does have the legal authority to cancel debt."

REP. TLAIB: "This unhinged Supreme Court can make all these decisions, but we're not going anywhere...The President...does have the legal authority to cancel debt."

Daily Caller

447,308 次观看 • 3 年前

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."

FactPost

14,546 次观看 • 9 个月前

House “leader” Hakeem Jeffries says he does NOT support Medicare for all! So once again, the party of “no we can’t” is telling everyone all the things they’re not gonna do.

House “leader” Hakeem Jeffries says he does NOT support Medicare for all! So once again, the party of “no we can’t” is telling everyone all the things they’re not gonna do.

B L A K E L E Y™℠©® LLC

10,215 次观看 • 12 天前

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt UNLEASHES on activist judge who banned President Trump from firing federal employees during the shutdown - says the judge DEFIED the Supreme Court "This same judge in May ILLEGALLY ruled that the president does not have the right to fire executive branch employees - the Supreme Court smacked this judge DOWN in July!" "They have NO legal rationale for this nationwide restraining order! She is now BLOCKING the administration from doing what the Supreme Court has already affirmed the president can do!" "She is WRONG...she is a FAR-LEFT HACK and she uses politics from the bench." 🔥

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt UNLEASHES on activist judge who banned President Trump from firing federal employees during the shutdown - says the judge DEFIED the Supreme Court "This same judge in May ILLEGALLY ruled that the president does not have the right to fire executive branch employees - the Supreme Court smacked this judge DOWN in July!" "They have NO legal rationale for this nationwide restraining order! She is now BLOCKING the administration from doing what the Supreme Court has already affirmed the president can do!" "She is WRONG...she is a FAR-LEFT HACK and she uses politics from the bench." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

411,172 次观看 • 10 个月前

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision

Acyn

1,112,434 次观看 • 1 年前

Hasan Piker asks Melat Kiros, CO-01 DSA candidate, to list her five main policies and rapid fire questions "Medicare for All. Housing First. Universal Child Care. Abolishing ICE. And more than anything, Publicly Financed Elections." The Colorado primary is June 30th, in 4 days

Hasan Piker asks Melat Kiros, CO-01 DSA candidate, to list her five main policies and rapid fire questions "Medicare for All. Housing First. Universal Child Care. Abolishing ICE. And more than anything, Publicly Financed Elections." The Colorado primary is June 30th, in 4 days

Popstonox

428,719 次观看 • 2 个月前

Socialism faces its next big test tomorrow in Florida. DSA-backed Oliver Larkin is taking on Rep. Jared Moskowitz while pushing a far-left agenda: Medicare for All, taxing the rich, abolishing and prosecuting ICE, ending military aid to Israel, expanding the Supreme Court, and eliminating the Electoral College. Larkin says DSA candidates could ultimately take the lead of the Democratic Party. Danamarie McNicholl breaks down the heated primary — and why a newly drawn congressional map has made this seat a prime Republican target. America's Newsroom

Socialism faces its next big test tomorrow in Florida. DSA-backed Oliver Larkin is taking on Rep. Jared Moskowitz while pushing a far-left agenda: Medicare for All, taxing the rich, abolishing and prosecuting ICE, ending military aid to Israel, expanding the Supreme Court, and eliminating the Electoral College. Larkin says DSA candidates could ultimately take the lead of the Democratic Party. Danamarie McNicholl breaks down the heated primary — and why a newly drawn congressional map has made this seat a prime Republican target. America's Newsroom

Fox News

476,241 次观看 • 12 天前

HOLY SHIT. Listen to this exchange at the Supreme Court: Justice Alito: “For equal protection purposes, what does it mean to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?" Pro-trans lawyer: "We do not have a definition for the court.”

HOLY SHIT. Listen to this exchange at the Supreme Court: Justice Alito: “For equal protection purposes, what does it mean to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?" Pro-trans lawyer: "We do not have a definition for the court.”

Libs of TikTok

951,379 次观看 • 7 个月前

The Democrats will expand the Supreme Court. BUTTIGIEG: "I think it's not so radical to suggest a different makeup of the Supreme Court. By the way… You know what article of the Constitution says that there are 9 Supreme Court justices? Trick question, it's not in there!"

The Democrats will expand the Supreme Court. BUTTIGIEG: "I think it's not so radical to suggest a different makeup of the Supreme Court. By the way… You know what article of the Constitution says that there are 9 Supreme Court justices? Trick question, it's not in there!"

Colin Wright

702,174 次观看 • 7 个月前

Colorado Democrat Socialist Melat Kiros says her focus in Congress will be to stop President Trump, abolish ICE, & pass Medicare for All: “We will not wait to take the fight to Donald Trump...to abolish ICE & pass Medicare for All.” She previously said 9/11 was America's fault.

Colorado Democrat Socialist Melat Kiros says her focus in Congress will be to stop President Trump, abolish ICE, & pass Medicare for All: “We will not wait to take the fight to Donald Trump...to abolish ICE & pass Medicare for All.” She previously said 9/11 was America's fault.

Derrick Evans

15,755 次观看 • 1 个月前

Scott Jennings takes a moment to remind the CNN panel of the one thing the Supreme Court ruling proved today. It completely SHATTERED a multi-year Democrat narrative. Scott Jennings: “And I’ll tell you one more thing.” “For every Democrat and every media person that has gone on for the last year or two about how this Supreme Court is a wholly owned subsidiary of Donald Trump, that it’s not independent, that it does whatever he says to do…” “Obviously, that narrative was OBLITERATED today.” “So to me, I thought this was actually…I thought the ruling was sound.” “I think the president is sound to try other statutes.” “And I think the narratives about the court not being independent and the president not obeying the court were TOTALLY blown up today.”

Scott Jennings takes a moment to remind the CNN panel of the one thing the Supreme Court ruling proved today. It completely SHATTERED a multi-year Democrat narrative. Scott Jennings: “And I’ll tell you one more thing.” “For every Democrat and every media person that has gone on for the last year or two about how this Supreme Court is a wholly owned subsidiary of Donald Trump, that it’s not independent, that it does whatever he says to do…” “Obviously, that narrative was OBLITERATED today.” “So to me, I thought this was actually…I thought the ruling was sound.” “I think the president is sound to try other statutes.” “And I think the narratives about the court not being independent and the president not obeying the court were TOTALLY blown up today.”

Overton

457,122 次观看 • 6 个月前