Do you understand?

Then we get taxed on that 8-10%

thats why you need something that has the potential to give you high velocity returns

I get it. Escape the matrix now.

that's why we use leverage

yes

The great deception

Year over year inflation in the us is 2.7% and the s$p average return is 11%, he pulled those numbers out of his ass

Yes

This just is not true tho.

it was never a question of if, only when. glad they're catching on.

FYI/

This guy is clueless. He's not an economist. So he thinks it's abnormal that money creation is linked to growth. What if the US never printed money, and was stuck at 30 billion from 1930 to 2025? Our economy would have never grown. You need currency to scale with productivity

what should we do about it? nothing

Understood bro

Understood Sweep

That's actually crazy

Sad truth 😭

This is just wow

Understood bruda

You need to compare the gains of the S&P to inflation

look into SPX6900

No the growth in the money supply reflects the growth in production and enables higher velocity of money. If money wasn’t being printed, people would not be incentivized to spend or invest money, because the money they have would only get more valuable.

Return in the last 25 years are much higher than 10%, quantitative easy over past 25 years are much lower than 10%. So bullshit is bullshit.

yeah, got it loud and clear

Yes I understand

we're on that matrix lmao

why does it take a professor 25 years to realize something that a 23 year old gambling addict degen understood 5 years ago? where these people brainwashed?

i understand completely

📊

understood

Yes 🙌

@grok explain with more context

prof after 25 years finally gets it: s&p nominal 9-10%, but that's not pure profit. objectively over 30 years: nominal total return ~10-11%, cpi inflation 2.5-3%, real 7-7.7%. prof overstated inflation at 8-10% that's closer to m2