Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 DOCTOR DROPS TRUTH BOMB ON MAMMOGRAMS 🚨 “Data shows we are literally CAUSING breast cancer with screening.” Dr. Jay Goodbinder just went nuclear: - After 10 yearly mammograms → 50%+ chance of a false-positive that leads to biopsies & more radiation - Crushing breasts with 40+ lbs of... force + radiation can rupture cysts/tumors and spread cells - Cochrane Collaboration: For every 2,000 women screened over 10 years, only ~1 life saved… but up to 10 healthy women over-treated + 8–9 eventually die from radiation-induced cancers - A major study (JNCI) found careful breast exams alone reduce mortality JUST AS MUCH as mammograms in women 50+ Is “early detection” worth becoming the statistic? Safer, zero-radiation alternatives exist RIGHT NOW: ✅ Thermography ✅ QT Ultrasound (no compression, better accuracy) ✅ MRI for high-risk True prevention? Cancer is metabolic: → Keto/low-carb (starves tumors) → Ditch seed oils, sugar, processed junk → Fasting → autophagy cleanup → Vitamin D >70 ng/mL (cuts risk dramatically) → Avoid synthetic birth control hormones Watch the full breakdown 👇 Tag every woman you love. They deserve to know. #Mammogram #BreastCancer #WomensHealth #CancerPrevention #Ketoshow more

Valerie Anne Smith

261,457 subscribers

3,643,572 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Mammograms Are A Billions Dollar Business. They're Only Useful For Profit & Always Do Terrible Harm To The Patient." Dr John McDougall "Do Mammograms harm? ALWAYS. Should Mammograms be done? NO." Mammographic compression causes cutaneous bruising, haematoma, rupture of breast implants & cystic masses. Repeated exposure to 3D Radiation causes Cancer. Current 3D Mammography delivers 3X more radiation than 2D mammograms of the past. For every 2,000 women, 1 woman's life is saved. But, in the process 5 to 50 women will be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation. 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers. These iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. Quote by World Renowned Cochrane Collaboration: "The best thing a woman can do to lower her risk of becoming a breast cancer patient is to avoid a Mammogram, which will lower her risk 33%." "If Mammograms had been a drug, it would have been withdrawn from the market long ago. Very few women if any, will benefit, whereas many will be harmed by Mammography. Mammography screening should be stopped because it is harmful." The screening that promotes health & not harm & doesn't cause cancer is Thermography & QT Ultrasound Imaging, which has 40 times the resolution of MRI. Lifestyle Cancer prevention to Metabolic Health is thru a Ketogenic Low Carb Way of Eating, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & excess sugar. And avoid synthetic hormonal birth control. 👇Mammography is Harmful👇 👇Lung Cancer From Mammography Radiation👇 Speaker: Dr John McDougall Video: Chris Wark of "Chris Beats Cancer"

"Mammograms Are A Billions Dollar Business. They're Only Useful For Profit & Always Do Terrible Harm To The Patient." Dr John McDougall "Do Mammograms harm? ALWAYS. Should Mammograms be done? NO." Mammographic compression causes cutaneous bruising, haematoma, rupture of breast implants & cystic masses. Repeated exposure to 3D Radiation causes Cancer. Current 3D Mammography delivers 3X more radiation than 2D mammograms of the past. For every 2,000 women, 1 woman's life is saved. But, in the process 5 to 50 women will be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation. 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers. These iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. Quote by World Renowned Cochrane Collaboration: "The best thing a woman can do to lower her risk of becoming a breast cancer patient is to avoid a Mammogram, which will lower her risk 33%." "If Mammograms had been a drug, it would have been withdrawn from the market long ago. Very few women if any, will benefit, whereas many will be harmed by Mammography. Mammography screening should be stopped because it is harmful." The screening that promotes health & not harm & doesn't cause cancer is Thermography & QT Ultrasound Imaging, which has 40 times the resolution of MRI. Lifestyle Cancer prevention to Metabolic Health is thru a Ketogenic Low Carb Way of Eating, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & excess sugar. And avoid synthetic hormonal birth control. 👇Mammography is Harmful👇 👇Lung Cancer From Mammography Radiation👇 Speaker: Dr John McDougall Video: Chris Wark of "Chris Beats Cancer"

Valerie Anne Smith

498,342 views • 1 year ago

"Data Shows There Is No Survival Advantage To Screening With Mammogram." Dr Jenn Simmons, MD "Mammogram Radiation & Overdiagnosis Leads To Cardiovascular Disease, Neurodegenerative Disease & Osteoporosis." "The Only One Who Benefits From A Mammogram Is The System For Profit." Mammograms Are A Billions Dollar Business. They're Only Useful For Profit & Always Do Terrible Harm To The Patient. For every 2,000 women, 1 woman's life is potentially saved. But, in the process 20 women will be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation. It can never be said that Mammography saves lives. 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers. These iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. 3D Mammograms use ionizing radiation at a dosage which cause the development of breast cancer. They expose your body to radiation that is 1000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray. Mammographic compression of the breast tissue causes cutaneous bruising, haematoma & rupture of cystic masses. This extreme compression spreads cancer cells if they already exist. Mammography is useless in fibrous dense breasts. False positive rate on a mammogram is 70%. False positives & the needless interventions that occur lead to invasive & avoidable biopsies. Upon further testing from these biopsies, 70-80% of detected “tumors” on Mammograms revealed no presence of cancer. Careful physical breast examination is as effective as screening mammography in reducing mortality from breast cancer in women aged over 50, according to a new study (Journal of the National Cancer Institute). Many countries have already abandoned deadly & harmful 3D Mammography & instead utilize safe QT Ultrasound & Thermography as the standard of care when preventive screening is wanted. Both have 40 times the resolution of MRI, without any radiation exposure. Both are incredibly accurate & detect 97% of abnormalities 8-10 years before other standard cancer detection tests. Cancer is a Metabolic Disease & can be prevented with lifestyle & diet interventions. A Ketogenic Low Carb Diet, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & sugar is preventive of Cancer. Avoid synthetic hormonal birth control. Fasting on a regular basis to rid the body thru Autophagy cellular turnover of any compromised mitochondrial cells. And keep Vitamin D3 level above 70 ng/ml is protective against Cancer. 👇Breast Self Exam As Effective As Mammography👇 👇QT Ultrasound Alternative To Mammography👇 👇Themography & Ultrasound For Breast Screening👇 Speaker: Dr Jenn Simmons, MD

"Data Shows There Is No Survival Advantage To Screening With Mammogram." Dr Jenn Simmons, MD "Mammogram Radiation & Overdiagnosis Leads To Cardiovascular Disease, Neurodegenerative Disease & Osteoporosis." "The Only One Who Benefits From A Mammogram Is The System For Profit." Mammograms Are A Billions Dollar Business. They're Only Useful For Profit & Always Do Terrible Harm To The Patient. For every 2,000 women, 1 woman's life is potentially saved. But, in the process 20 women will be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation. It can never be said that Mammography saves lives. 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers. These iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. 3D Mammograms use ionizing radiation at a dosage which cause the development of breast cancer. They expose your body to radiation that is 1000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray. Mammographic compression of the breast tissue causes cutaneous bruising, haematoma & rupture of cystic masses. This extreme compression spreads cancer cells if they already exist. Mammography is useless in fibrous dense breasts. False positive rate on a mammogram is 70%. False positives & the needless interventions that occur lead to invasive & avoidable biopsies. Upon further testing from these biopsies, 70-80% of detected “tumors” on Mammograms revealed no presence of cancer. Careful physical breast examination is as effective as screening mammography in reducing mortality from breast cancer in women aged over 50, according to a new study (Journal of the National Cancer Institute). Many countries have already abandoned deadly & harmful 3D Mammography & instead utilize safe QT Ultrasound & Thermography as the standard of care when preventive screening is wanted. Both have 40 times the resolution of MRI, without any radiation exposure. Both are incredibly accurate & detect 97% of abnormalities 8-10 years before other standard cancer detection tests. Cancer is a Metabolic Disease & can be prevented with lifestyle & diet interventions. A Ketogenic Low Carb Diet, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & sugar is preventive of Cancer. Avoid synthetic hormonal birth control. Fasting on a regular basis to rid the body thru Autophagy cellular turnover of any compromised mitochondrial cells. And keep Vitamin D3 level above 70 ng/ml is protective against Cancer. 👇Breast Self Exam As Effective As Mammography👇 👇QT Ultrasound Alternative To Mammography👇 👇Themography & Ultrasound For Breast Screening👇 Speaker: Dr Jenn Simmons, MD

Valerie Anne Smith

94,891 views • 1 year ago

"Mammograms Cause Pain & Injury, Produce Cancer & Are Pure Madness." Dr Thomas Lodi "If Men Had To Endure Their Testicles Injured & Squashed Between 2 Plates & Then Irradiated..." "Mammograms Would Be Discontinued & Banned." "Irradiating Inflamed Injured Tissue Is Madness." Mammogram Screenings Are Harmful & Should Be Abandoned. "There is a Zero Net Benefit For Mammograms. The Best Way To Lower Breast Cancer Risk Is To Avoid A Mammogram." World Renowned Nordic Cochrane Centre Statement Mammograms Are A Billions Dollar Business. They're Only Useful For Profit & Always Do Terrible Harm To The Patient. For every 2,000 women, 1 woman's life is potentially saved. But, in the process 50 women will be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation. It can never be said that Mammography saves lives. 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers. These iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. Mammograms use ionizing radiation at a dosage which cause the development of breast cancer. They expose your body to radiation that is 1000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray. Mammographic compression of the breast tissue causes cutaneous bruising, haematoma & rupture of cystic masses. This extreme compression spreads cancer cells if they already exist. Mammography is useless in fibrous dense breasts. False positive rate on a mammogram is 70%. False positives & the needless interventions that occur lead to invasive & avoidable biopsies. Upon further testing from these biopsies, 70-80% of detected “tumors” on Mammograms revealed no presence of cancer. Many countries have already abandoned deadly & harmful 3D Mammography & instead utilize safe QT Ultrasound & Thermography as the standard of care when preventive screening is wanted. Both have 40 times the resolution of MRI, without any radiation exposure. Both are incredibly accurate & detect 97% of abnormalities 8-10 years before other standard cancer detection tests. Careful physical breast examination is as effective as screening mammography in reducing mortality from breast cancer in women aged over 50, according to a new study (Journal of the National Cancer Institute). Cancer is a Metabolic Disease & can be prevented with lifestyle & diet interventions. A Ketogenic Low Carb Diet, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & sugar is preventive of Cancer. Avoid synthetic hormonal birth control. Fasting on a regular basis to rid the body thru Autophagy cellular turnover of any compromised mitochondrial cells. And keep Vitamin D3 level above 70 ng/ml is protective against Cancer. 👇QT Ultrasound Alternative To Mammography👇 👇Themography & Ultrasound For Breast Screening👇 👇Breast Self Exam As Effective As Mammography👇 Speaker: Dr Thomas lodi, MD Oncologist

"Mammograms Cause Pain & Injury, Produce Cancer & Are Pure Madness." Dr Thomas Lodi "If Men Had To Endure Their Testicles Injured & Squashed Between 2 Plates & Then Irradiated..." "Mammograms Would Be Discontinued & Banned." "Irradiating Inflamed Injured Tissue Is Madness." Mammogram Screenings Are Harmful & Should Be Abandoned. "There is a Zero Net Benefit For Mammograms. The Best Way To Lower Breast Cancer Risk Is To Avoid A Mammogram." World Renowned Nordic Cochrane Centre Statement Mammograms Are A Billions Dollar Business. They're Only Useful For Profit & Always Do Terrible Harm To The Patient. For every 2,000 women, 1 woman's life is potentially saved. But, in the process 50 women will be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation. It can never be said that Mammography saves lives. 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers. These iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. Mammograms use ionizing radiation at a dosage which cause the development of breast cancer. They expose your body to radiation that is 1000 times greater than that from a chest x-ray. Mammographic compression of the breast tissue causes cutaneous bruising, haematoma & rupture of cystic masses. This extreme compression spreads cancer cells if they already exist. Mammography is useless in fibrous dense breasts. False positive rate on a mammogram is 70%. False positives & the needless interventions that occur lead to invasive & avoidable biopsies. Upon further testing from these biopsies, 70-80% of detected “tumors” on Mammograms revealed no presence of cancer. Many countries have already abandoned deadly & harmful 3D Mammography & instead utilize safe QT Ultrasound & Thermography as the standard of care when preventive screening is wanted. Both have 40 times the resolution of MRI, without any radiation exposure. Both are incredibly accurate & detect 97% of abnormalities 8-10 years before other standard cancer detection tests. Careful physical breast examination is as effective as screening mammography in reducing mortality from breast cancer in women aged over 50, according to a new study (Journal of the National Cancer Institute). Cancer is a Metabolic Disease & can be prevented with lifestyle & diet interventions. A Ketogenic Low Carb Diet, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & sugar is preventive of Cancer. Avoid synthetic hormonal birth control. Fasting on a regular basis to rid the body thru Autophagy cellular turnover of any compromised mitochondrial cells. And keep Vitamin D3 level above 70 ng/ml is protective against Cancer. 👇QT Ultrasound Alternative To Mammography👇 👇Themography & Ultrasound For Breast Screening👇 👇Breast Self Exam As Effective As Mammography👇 Speaker: Dr Thomas lodi, MD Oncologist

Valerie Anne Smith

101,748 views • 1 year ago

"Mammograms Are Harmful & Should Be Abandoned." Dr Jenn Simmons, Cancer Surgeon "It Is Radiation, Of Course It's Going To Cause Cancer." "For every 2,000 women, we may potentially save 1 woman's life. And we will cause 10 to 20 women to be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation." "You can't ever say that a Mammogram saved someone's life." 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers, & these iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. Mammography was not meant to prevent Cancer & it always does more harm than good. "There is absolutely no survival advantage to Mastectomy." "Breast Cancer is both an environmental disease & a Metabolic Disease. And so much of Breast Cancer is the end of the line of Metabolic Dysfunction." The Reputable Experts From Nordic Cochrane Center Report: "The best thing a women can do to lower her risk of becoming a breast cancer patient is to avoid a Mammogram, which will lower her risk 33%." "If Mammograms had been a drug, it would have been withdrawn from the market long ago. Very few women if any, will benefit, whereas many will be harmed by Mammography. Mammography screening should be stopped because it is harmful." The screening that promotes health & not harm, & doesn't cause cancer is QT Ultrasound Imaging, which has 40 times the resolution of MRI. Lifestyle prevention to Metabolic Health is thru a Ketogenic Low Carb Way of Eating, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & excess sugar. And avoiding synthetic hormonal birth control. 👇Abandoning Harmful Cancerous Mammography👇 👇Full Podcast Episode From Video Clip👇 H/T: Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark

"Mammograms Are Harmful & Should Be Abandoned." Dr Jenn Simmons, Cancer Surgeon "It Is Radiation, Of Course It's Going To Cause Cancer." "For every 2,000 women, we may potentially save 1 woman's life. And we will cause 10 to 20 women to be treated unnecessarily with surgery, chemo & radiation." "You can't ever say that a Mammogram saved someone's life." 600-1,000 of every 2,000 women who undergo Mammograms, will go thru more radiation screening & biopsies for potential diagnosis. Repeated radiation exposure causes deaths from heart disease, lung cancer & other cancers, & these iatrogenic deaths are not counted as breast cancer deaths. Mammography was not meant to prevent Cancer & it always does more harm than good. "There is absolutely no survival advantage to Mastectomy." "Breast Cancer is both an environmental disease & a Metabolic Disease. And so much of Breast Cancer is the end of the line of Metabolic Dysfunction." The Reputable Experts From Nordic Cochrane Center Report: "The best thing a women can do to lower her risk of becoming a breast cancer patient is to avoid a Mammogram, which will lower her risk 33%." "If Mammograms had been a drug, it would have been withdrawn from the market long ago. Very few women if any, will benefit, whereas many will be harmed by Mammography. Mammography screening should be stopped because it is harmful." The screening that promotes health & not harm, & doesn't cause cancer is QT Ultrasound Imaging, which has 40 times the resolution of MRI. Lifestyle prevention to Metabolic Health is thru a Ketogenic Low Carb Way of Eating, eliminating seed oils, Ultra Processed Foods & excess sugar. And avoiding synthetic hormonal birth control. 👇Abandoning Harmful Cancerous Mammography👇 👇Full Podcast Episode From Video Clip👇 H/T: Culture Apothecary with Alex Clark

Valerie Anne Smith

283,253 views • 1 year ago

CAC Coronary Artery Calcium Scan: New Heart Disease Test Causes Cancer. Major Organizations Warn Public Against It... 42 Of Every 100K Patients Develop Cancer From Ionizing Radiation. Radiation Dosage Varies 10X From One Hospital To Another, Causing 5,600 New Cases Of Cancer. The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology & the United States Preventive Services Task Force do not recommend the use of heart CT scans for patients with a low or high risk of heart disease because CT scans could be more harmful than beneficial due to the relatively high dose of radiation. "Tens of millions of adults would be exposed to relatively high levels of radiation through this procedure. Doctors still have not established a standard dose of radiation to be used for heart CT scans & doses for this test vary from one hospital to another, with some patients getting 10X the amount of radiation as patients in another hospital." A 2009 study showed that one heart CT scan for the 50 million Americans who would receive the average radiation dose, these scans would result in 5,600 new cancer cases. The number of new cancer cases would be even higher if individuals were screened more than once in their lifetime. Radiation from CT scans is even of concern to the FDA even when the CT scans are necessary. On October 9, 2009, the FDA announced that it was notifying healthcare professionals that 206 patients who were being tested for stroke received CT radiation doses that were 8X the expected level at one particular medical facility. While this event involved a single kind of diagnostic test at one facility, the FDA warned that “it reflects more widespread problems with CT quality assurance programs.” Each year, over 600,000 Americans die from heart disease even though heart disease can be prevented. Although heart CT scanning may be a useful tool in detecting blockages in heart arteries, there is not enough evidence to show that this test is worth the risks, especially compared to traditional risk factor assessment. For this reason, the Cancer Prevention & Treatment Fund of the National Research Center for Women & Families agrees with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that heart CT scans are not recommended for screening for heart disease. 👇CAC Screening Radiation 10X Cancer Risk👇 👇Ionizing Radiation Risk From CAC Test👇 👇Cancer Risk From CT Scan Radiation👇 Video: Dr David Alfrey

CAC Coronary Artery Calcium Scan: New Heart Disease Test Causes Cancer. Major Organizations Warn Public Against It... 42 Of Every 100K Patients Develop Cancer From Ionizing Radiation. Radiation Dosage Varies 10X From One Hospital To Another, Causing 5,600 New Cases Of Cancer. The American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology & the United States Preventive Services Task Force do not recommend the use of heart CT scans for patients with a low or high risk of heart disease because CT scans could be more harmful than beneficial due to the relatively high dose of radiation. "Tens of millions of adults would be exposed to relatively high levels of radiation through this procedure. Doctors still have not established a standard dose of radiation to be used for heart CT scans & doses for this test vary from one hospital to another, with some patients getting 10X the amount of radiation as patients in another hospital." A 2009 study showed that one heart CT scan for the 50 million Americans who would receive the average radiation dose, these scans would result in 5,600 new cancer cases. The number of new cancer cases would be even higher if individuals were screened more than once in their lifetime. Radiation from CT scans is even of concern to the FDA even when the CT scans are necessary. On October 9, 2009, the FDA announced that it was notifying healthcare professionals that 206 patients who were being tested for stroke received CT radiation doses that were 8X the expected level at one particular medical facility. While this event involved a single kind of diagnostic test at one facility, the FDA warned that “it reflects more widespread problems with CT quality assurance programs.” Each year, over 600,000 Americans die from heart disease even though heart disease can be prevented. Although heart CT scanning may be a useful tool in detecting blockages in heart arteries, there is not enough evidence to show that this test is worth the risks, especially compared to traditional risk factor assessment. For this reason, the Cancer Prevention & Treatment Fund of the National Research Center for Women & Families agrees with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that heart CT scans are not recommended for screening for heart disease. 👇CAC Screening Radiation 10X Cancer Risk👇 👇Ionizing Radiation Risk From CAC Test👇 👇Cancer Risk From CT Scan Radiation👇 Video: Dr David Alfrey

Valerie Anne Smith

114,523 views • 11 months ago

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood

Valerie Anne Smith

197,823 views • 1 year ago

🚨 SHOCKING BOMBSHELL from Dr. Bryan Ardis that will make you question EVERY cancer diagnosis! Dr. Ardis drops the truth bomb: “50% of all the cancerous tumors & polyps that I was seeing in my patients actually weren’t cancer — they were parasitic egg sacs MISDIAGNOSED as cancerous tumors.” “Every research study on Ivermectin curing cancer is because it’s actually parasites.” “There is a HUGE misdiagnosis of cancer for parasites.” “There’s always an underlying parasitic cause. ”Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug… yet it’s reportedly curing “cancers” all over the world. Why? Because a massive percentage of what’s called “cancer” is actually parasites — not malignant cells! Parasites linked to tumors & “cancer” in specific organs: Schistosomiasis (blood fluke) → bladder Liver flukes (Opisthorchis & Clonorchis) → liver & bile ducts Toxoplasmosis → ocular tumors, meningioma, leukemia, lymphomas Cryptosporidium → colorectal/digestive tract Trichomonas vaginalis → cervix & prostate Oncologists are never taught to look for parasites as the root cause. So instead of cheap, targeted antiparasitic treatment… patients get pushed into toxic chemotherapy & radiation that destroys everything in hopes of killing the “cancer.” If these are often just parasites (easily treated with ivermectin, fenbendazole, natural protocols, low-sugar diets, and heavy metal detox), why the pressure for the most expensive, side-effect-heavy “treatments” imaginable? This explains everything.The video is pure fire — watch it and decide for yourself:

🚨 SHOCKING BOMBSHELL from Dr. Bryan Ardis that will make you question EVERY cancer diagnosis! Dr. Ardis drops the truth bomb: “50% of all the cancerous tumors & polyps that I was seeing in my patients actually weren’t cancer — they were parasitic egg sacs MISDIAGNOSED as cancerous tumors.” “Every research study on Ivermectin curing cancer is because it’s actually parasites.” “There is a HUGE misdiagnosis of cancer for parasites.” “There’s always an underlying parasitic cause. ”Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug… yet it’s reportedly curing “cancers” all over the world. Why? Because a massive percentage of what’s called “cancer” is actually parasites — not malignant cells! Parasites linked to tumors & “cancer” in specific organs: Schistosomiasis (blood fluke) → bladder Liver flukes (Opisthorchis & Clonorchis) → liver & bile ducts Toxoplasmosis → ocular tumors, meningioma, leukemia, lymphomas Cryptosporidium → colorectal/digestive tract Trichomonas vaginalis → cervix & prostate Oncologists are never taught to look for parasites as the root cause. So instead of cheap, targeted antiparasitic treatment… patients get pushed into toxic chemotherapy & radiation that destroys everything in hopes of killing the “cancer.” If these are often just parasites (easily treated with ivermectin, fenbendazole, natural protocols, low-sugar diets, and heavy metal detox), why the pressure for the most expensive, side-effect-heavy “treatments” imaginable? This explains everything.The video is pure fire — watch it and decide for yourself:

Dr. Dawn Michael

239,421 views • 8 days ago

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.

TheLiverDoc™

193,164 views • 6 months ago

"Misdiagnosed Cancerous Tumors & Polyps That Are Actually Parasitic Egg Sacs." Dr Bryan Ardis "There's Always An Underlying Parasitic Cause." "Every Research Study On Ivermectin Curing Cancer Is Because It's Actually Parasites." "There Is A Huge Misdiagnosis Of Cancer For Parasites." "70% of all autoimmune diseases such as Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lupus, Fibromyalgia, Sjogren's, MS...there's always an underlying parasitic cause." "50% of all the cancerous tumors & polyps that I was seeing in my patients actually weren't cancer, they were parasitic egg sacs misdiagnosed as cancerous tumors." "Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic drug specifically, but it's being used around the world to combat & cure all types of cancers." Why does that work? Because most of them are parasites. If knowing they are parasites & easily treated, no one would be pressured to do toxic chemotherapy & radiation in cancer treatment centers. If the Oncologists are not taught to look for parasites as the cause or that the cancerous tumor or mass is actually parasitic eggs sacs...If you never got that training you wouldn't even know that was a possibility. If Oncologists never acknowledge this, you would never know there are cheap alternatives to kill parasites & remove them from the human body, all naturally even, versus having to use chemotherapy & radiation to try to kill ALL CELLS in the human body hoping you don't kill the person. Common Parasites & What Organ They Inhabit: Schistosomiasis (Blood Fluke)...reside in the bladder. Opisthorchis viverrini & Clonorchis sinensis (Liver Flukes)...reside in the liver & bile ducts. Toxoplasmosis...causes ocular tumors, meningioma, leukemia & lymphomas. Cryptosporidium parvum...reside in the digestive tract, mainly colorectal. Trichomonas Vaginalis...resides in the cervix & prostate. 🪱Some parasites consume your food from the inside of the body, leaving you hungry & weak even after eating well, unable to gain healthy weight. 🪱Other parasites feed off of your red blood cells, leading to ANEMIA. Some parasites lay eggs, causing ITCHING, IRRITABILITY & even INSOMNIA. A Parasite protocol is important & also heavy metal detox simultaneously because parasites are attracted to a host with heavy metal toxicity. Also important is eliminating the parasites fuel source, which is sugar. A low carbohydrate animal based diet devoid of glucose, sucrose & fructose...starves the parasites of their preferred fuel. Nationally recognized cancer/parasite protocol linked below: If you don't want to use any pharmaceuticals, I can also recommend natural drug free herbal/mineral products that will kill parasites also if anyone asks in replies or DM. 👇Ivermectin, Fenben, Keto, Fasting Protocol👇 👇Ivermectin: Cancer Tumor Cure👇 👇Ivermectin: Anti Parasitic Therapy👇 Speaker: Bryan Ardis

"Misdiagnosed Cancerous Tumors & Polyps That Are Actually Parasitic Egg Sacs." Dr Bryan Ardis "There's Always An Underlying Parasitic Cause." "Every Research Study On Ivermectin Curing Cancer Is Because It's Actually Parasites." "There Is A Huge Misdiagnosis Of Cancer For Parasites." "70% of all autoimmune diseases such as Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lupus, Fibromyalgia, Sjogren's, MS...there's always an underlying parasitic cause." "50% of all the cancerous tumors & polyps that I was seeing in my patients actually weren't cancer, they were parasitic egg sacs misdiagnosed as cancerous tumors." "Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic drug specifically, but it's being used around the world to combat & cure all types of cancers." Why does that work? Because most of them are parasites. If knowing they are parasites & easily treated, no one would be pressured to do toxic chemotherapy & radiation in cancer treatment centers. If the Oncologists are not taught to look for parasites as the cause or that the cancerous tumor or mass is actually parasitic eggs sacs...If you never got that training you wouldn't even know that was a possibility. If Oncologists never acknowledge this, you would never know there are cheap alternatives to kill parasites & remove them from the human body, all naturally even, versus having to use chemotherapy & radiation to try to kill ALL CELLS in the human body hoping you don't kill the person. Common Parasites & What Organ They Inhabit: Schistosomiasis (Blood Fluke)...reside in the bladder. Opisthorchis viverrini & Clonorchis sinensis (Liver Flukes)...reside in the liver & bile ducts. Toxoplasmosis...causes ocular tumors, meningioma, leukemia & lymphomas. Cryptosporidium parvum...reside in the digestive tract, mainly colorectal. Trichomonas Vaginalis...resides in the cervix & prostate. 🪱Some parasites consume your food from the inside of the body, leaving you hungry & weak even after eating well, unable to gain healthy weight. 🪱Other parasites feed off of your red blood cells, leading to ANEMIA. Some parasites lay eggs, causing ITCHING, IRRITABILITY & even INSOMNIA. A Parasite protocol is important & also heavy metal detox simultaneously because parasites are attracted to a host with heavy metal toxicity. Also important is eliminating the parasites fuel source, which is sugar. A low carbohydrate animal based diet devoid of glucose, sucrose & fructose...starves the parasites of their preferred fuel. Nationally recognized cancer/parasite protocol linked below: If you don't want to use any pharmaceuticals, I can also recommend natural drug free herbal/mineral products that will kill parasites also if anyone asks in replies or DM. 👇Ivermectin, Fenben, Keto, Fasting Protocol👇 👇Ivermectin: Cancer Tumor Cure👇 👇Ivermectin: Anti Parasitic Therapy👇 Speaker: Bryan Ardis

Valerie Anne Smith

648,478 views • 1 year ago

74% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment & Would Instead Use Alternative Real Cancer Cures For Themselves. Doctors Cite Chemotherapy As Unacceptably Cytotoxic & The 5 Year Survival Rate Is Only 2.1% Yet, Doctors Push Chemo Onto Their Own Patients. In the MacKillop et al study, only 17% of medical oncologists said that they would take chemotherapy for painful bone metastases & spine cancer. Even with modern chemotherapy, less than 30% of medical oncologists & oncology nurses would take chemotherapy. Cited in "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies"... The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Chemotherapy is incredibly toxic & must be handled in the clinical setting as a biohazard. Medical professionals who handle its contents in a hospital setting must wear protective gear for personal protection from the poisonous features of chemotherapy liquids. Chemotherapy came from one of the cruelest weapons ever invented as it was a weapon of war called Mustard Gas. Mustard Gas was banned in 1925 for being used as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm & inhumane use against war enemies. After that, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue & decided to market it as a drug for profit. The 1st chemotherapy drug was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), which is a Nitrogen Mustard. Currently, 5 Nitrogen Mustards are used in Chemotherapy including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy is not the answer for healing the body from cancer. Scientists Have Known Since the 1930s That Fasting Starves Cancer Cells… So Why Is It Ignored? 🤔 Dr. Otto Warburg (Nobel Prize winner) discovered that cancer cells thrive on glucose (sugar). He found that cancer cells have a damaged metabolism, meaning they rely almost entirely on fermenting sugar for energy—unlike healthy cells, which can switch to fat or ketones. ✅ Fasting drops blood sugar & insulin levels – Starving cancer of its preferred fuel. ✅ Increases ketones – Cancer cells cannot use ketones for energy & thus starve & die off. ✅ Triggers autophagy – The body removes damaged cells, including pre-cancerous ones. ✅ Boosts immune function – Fasting increases white blood cell regeneration, helping fight disease. 🚨 So why don’t doctors recommend fasting? Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation patients than a free, natural intervention. Meanwhile, studies show fasting + a ketogenic diet slows tumor growth, shrinks tumors & makes complete remission possible. But instead of researching this further, mainstream medicine pushes drugs & expensive treatments. Dr William Makis & Dr Paul Marik, along with many leading physicians & oncologists have developed a groundbreaking protocol entitled: 'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol' which involves a thorough step by step protocol of fasting & eliminating all glucose from the diet, while using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients & lifestyle changes for cancer treatment into remission. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Oncologists Would Not Choose Chemotherapy👇 👇5 Year Survival On Cancer Malignancies Chemo👇 👇Dr Thomas Seyfried: Cancer Metabolic Disease👇 Speaker: Dr Eric Berg

74% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment & Would Instead Use Alternative Real Cancer Cures For Themselves. Doctors Cite Chemotherapy As Unacceptably Cytotoxic & The 5 Year Survival Rate Is Only 2.1% Yet, Doctors Push Chemo Onto Their Own Patients. In the MacKillop et al study, only 17% of medical oncologists said that they would take chemotherapy for painful bone metastases & spine cancer. Even with modern chemotherapy, less than 30% of medical oncologists & oncology nurses would take chemotherapy. Cited in "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies"... The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Chemotherapy is incredibly toxic & must be handled in the clinical setting as a biohazard. Medical professionals who handle its contents in a hospital setting must wear protective gear for personal protection from the poisonous features of chemotherapy liquids. Chemotherapy came from one of the cruelest weapons ever invented as it was a weapon of war called Mustard Gas. Mustard Gas was banned in 1925 for being used as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm & inhumane use against war enemies. After that, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue & decided to market it as a drug for profit. The 1st chemotherapy drug was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), which is a Nitrogen Mustard. Currently, 5 Nitrogen Mustards are used in Chemotherapy including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy is not the answer for healing the body from cancer. Scientists Have Known Since the 1930s That Fasting Starves Cancer Cells… So Why Is It Ignored? 🤔 Dr. Otto Warburg (Nobel Prize winner) discovered that cancer cells thrive on glucose (sugar). He found that cancer cells have a damaged metabolism, meaning they rely almost entirely on fermenting sugar for energy—unlike healthy cells, which can switch to fat or ketones. ✅ Fasting drops blood sugar & insulin levels – Starving cancer of its preferred fuel. ✅ Increases ketones – Cancer cells cannot use ketones for energy & thus starve & die off. ✅ Triggers autophagy – The body removes damaged cells, including pre-cancerous ones. ✅ Boosts immune function – Fasting increases white blood cell regeneration, helping fight disease. 🚨 So why don’t doctors recommend fasting? Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation patients than a free, natural intervention. Meanwhile, studies show fasting + a ketogenic diet slows tumor growth, shrinks tumors & makes complete remission possible. But instead of researching this further, mainstream medicine pushes drugs & expensive treatments. Dr William Makis & Dr Paul Marik, along with many leading physicians & oncologists have developed a groundbreaking protocol entitled: 'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol' which involves a thorough step by step protocol of fasting & eliminating all glucose from the diet, while using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients & lifestyle changes for cancer treatment into remission. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Oncologists Would Not Choose Chemotherapy👇 👇5 Year Survival On Cancer Malignancies Chemo👇 👇Dr Thomas Seyfried: Cancer Metabolic Disease👇 Speaker: Dr Eric Berg

Valerie Anne Smith

285,636 views • 10 months ago

"A Colonoscopy Is Far Too Dangerous, I Recommend Against Them." Dr John McDougall, MD "7 Out Of Every 100 People Suffer Serious Major Complications." "1 In A 1,000 Have A Colon Perforation & Half Of These People Will Die. "Colonoscopies Are Harming More Lives Than It Saves." ✳️Written Post Contains... 1⃣ Research data, 2⃣ Colonoscopy complication rates 3⃣ Alternative screening methods to colonoscopy 1⃣ The U.S. is the outlier of the world who uses colonoscopy as 1st line colon-cancer screening modality. There are about 15 million colonoscopies done in the U.S. every year. In 2001, Medicare agreed to pay for colonoscopy as a screening tool & that’s when the US made Colonoscopy as 1st line diagnostic. It is for money & profit, not health. Europe, Canada, Australia & parts of S America do not use Colonoscopy as a preventive screening. In those countries, the predominant colon-cancer screening is the stool test, or the newer version of that called FIT. The absolute risk of developing colon cancer for people following the Standard American Diet is 2.5%. Risk of cancer rate drops to almost 0% when a low carb/low sugar diet is followed. Yet, colonoscopy complication risk is 7%. One of the most serious hazards, often leading to death, is perforation of the colon, which occurs in about 1 per 1,000 procedures. It takes 1,250 people screened with colonoscopy to diagnose 1 cancer. This is almost an even exchange: for 1 cancer diagnosis & potential life saved, 1 life is lost from a complication, like perforation. 3 Highly regarded institutions warn colonoscopy does not reduce mortality... The Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine boldly stated, “…there is no randomized clinical trial (RCT) (or other high-quality evidence) showing that colonoscopy reduces CRC (colorectal cancer) mortality. In fact, the only tests shown to reduce CRC mortality in RCTs are periodic FOBT (fecal tests). The lack of benefits, & substantial costs & harms, has caused the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Care to tell the citizens of Canada: “We recommend not using colonoscopy as a screening test for colorectal cancer.” The New England Journal of Medicine published the NordIC trial, the largest randomized study published on the possible benefits from colonoscopy 10 years after screening..."The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in those who had colonoscopy & 11.04% in those who did not have a colonoscopy." Unfortunately, these undeniable findings that screening using colonoscopy will not reduce your risk of dying will have little influence on medical doctors & facilities performing this highly profitable procedure, which brings in $4Billion profit each year. 2⃣ Colonoscopy Complication Rates: GI Microbiome: The harsh prep of toxic polyethylene glycol (PEG) to clean out the entire digestive tract ahead of a Colonoscopy kills 99% of beneficial good bacteria. Resulting is months of digestive issues as the digestive tract attempts to recolonize. Cardiac Event: 1 in 100 will suffer an Arrhythmia or Myocardial infarction. Bleeding: 1 in 2,000 will suffer bleeding needing inpatient intervention. Bowel Perforation: 1 in 1,000 requiring emergency surgical repair with risk of fatality. Spleen Injury: 1 in 6,000 from colorectal endoscopy tool injures the Splenocolic Ligament, emergency surgery & possible fatality. Infection: 1 in 1,000 will suffer bacterial infection which can develop into Sepsis. 3⃣ Non Invasive alternative testing is superior to Colonoscopy, used in most other countries around the world: Virtual Colonoscopy: used for colon cancer screening & to detect polyps or other growths in the colon. Camera Pill: used for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to examine the colon. The M2-PK: (tumor M2-pyruvate kinase) test is a non-invasive screening test that can detect colorectal cancer & polyps early. FOBT: Fecal Occult Blood Test is a non-invasive stool test to detect blood, cancer & polyps. FIT-DNA: Fecal Immunochemical Test detects altered DNA in serum blood tests & in stool. 👇Cardiac Events Post Colonoscopy👇 👇Other Countries Use Non Invasive Colon Tests👇 👇Post Colonoscopy Infections👇 Speakers: Chris Wark & Dr John McDougall, MD

"A Colonoscopy Is Far Too Dangerous, I Recommend Against Them." Dr John McDougall, MD "7 Out Of Every 100 People Suffer Serious Major Complications." "1 In A 1,000 Have A Colon Perforation & Half Of These People Will Die. "Colonoscopies Are Harming More Lives Than It Saves." ✳️Written Post Contains... 1⃣ Research data, 2⃣ Colonoscopy complication rates 3⃣ Alternative screening methods to colonoscopy 1⃣ The U.S. is the outlier of the world who uses colonoscopy as 1st line colon-cancer screening modality. There are about 15 million colonoscopies done in the U.S. every year. In 2001, Medicare agreed to pay for colonoscopy as a screening tool & that’s when the US made Colonoscopy as 1st line diagnostic. It is for money & profit, not health. Europe, Canada, Australia & parts of S America do not use Colonoscopy as a preventive screening. In those countries, the predominant colon-cancer screening is the stool test, or the newer version of that called FIT. The absolute risk of developing colon cancer for people following the Standard American Diet is 2.5%. Risk of cancer rate drops to almost 0% when a low carb/low sugar diet is followed. Yet, colonoscopy complication risk is 7%. One of the most serious hazards, often leading to death, is perforation of the colon, which occurs in about 1 per 1,000 procedures. It takes 1,250 people screened with colonoscopy to diagnose 1 cancer. This is almost an even exchange: for 1 cancer diagnosis & potential life saved, 1 life is lost from a complication, like perforation. 3 Highly regarded institutions warn colonoscopy does not reduce mortality... The Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine boldly stated, “…there is no randomized clinical trial (RCT) (or other high-quality evidence) showing that colonoscopy reduces CRC (colorectal cancer) mortality. In fact, the only tests shown to reduce CRC mortality in RCTs are periodic FOBT (fecal tests). The lack of benefits, & substantial costs & harms, has caused the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Care to tell the citizens of Canada: “We recommend not using colonoscopy as a screening test for colorectal cancer.” The New England Journal of Medicine published the NordIC trial, the largest randomized study published on the possible benefits from colonoscopy 10 years after screening..."The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in those who had colonoscopy & 11.04% in those who did not have a colonoscopy." Unfortunately, these undeniable findings that screening using colonoscopy will not reduce your risk of dying will have little influence on medical doctors & facilities performing this highly profitable procedure, which brings in $4Billion profit each year. 2⃣ Colonoscopy Complication Rates: GI Microbiome: The harsh prep of toxic polyethylene glycol (PEG) to clean out the entire digestive tract ahead of a Colonoscopy kills 99% of beneficial good bacteria. Resulting is months of digestive issues as the digestive tract attempts to recolonize. Cardiac Event: 1 in 100 will suffer an Arrhythmia or Myocardial infarction. Bleeding: 1 in 2,000 will suffer bleeding needing inpatient intervention. Bowel Perforation: 1 in 1,000 requiring emergency surgical repair with risk of fatality. Spleen Injury: 1 in 6,000 from colorectal endoscopy tool injures the Splenocolic Ligament, emergency surgery & possible fatality. Infection: 1 in 1,000 will suffer bacterial infection which can develop into Sepsis. 3⃣ Non Invasive alternative testing is superior to Colonoscopy, used in most other countries around the world: Virtual Colonoscopy: used for colon cancer screening & to detect polyps or other growths in the colon. Camera Pill: used for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) to examine the colon. The M2-PK: (tumor M2-pyruvate kinase) test is a non-invasive screening test that can detect colorectal cancer & polyps early. FOBT: Fecal Occult Blood Test is a non-invasive stool test to detect blood, cancer & polyps. FIT-DNA: Fecal Immunochemical Test detects altered DNA in serum blood tests & in stool. 👇Cardiac Events Post Colonoscopy👇 👇Other Countries Use Non Invasive Colon Tests👇 👇Post Colonoscopy Infections👇 Speakers: Chris Wark & Dr John McDougall, MD

Valerie Anne Smith

710,750 views • 9 months ago

I am sorry but Dr Pal Manickam, the Gastroenterologist from California, is becoming not just a health misinformation menace, but also a subtle "hate-monger" with his divisive attitude towards dietary choices in India, also known as Bharat, a Union of States and marriage of [dietary] cultures and traditions. Claims: 1. Eating red meat (beef and pork) causes colon cancer 2. Nitrosamines (from nitrites/nitrates) in red meat causes colon cancer 3. Cancer screening in USA above age of 50, but not in India 4. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers in India 5. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers because Malayalees eat a lot of beef. A lot. Response: 1. Eating red meat does not cause colon cancer Higher red meat consumption was shown to have a correlation with increased risk for colon cancer, but the evidence for independent association was weak and remains weak Eating red meat does not increase risk of colon cancer. Excessive consumption of red meat/ processed meat (excessive not yet fully defined across populations) was confusingly correlated with increased risk of colon cancer 2. Studies have only looked at nitrites and nitrates [and hence nitrosamine formation] causing stomach cancer and not colon cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) also focussed on nitrosamines and stomach cancer, but the potential role for dietary nitrate/nitrite in colon cancer is not conclusively proven. Meat-based diets (specifically processed meat, not fresh meat) have a well described higher risk for cancer, but it is not readily attributable to nitrite consistently in all studies. Most studies are on ground and well water and not meat. And the strongest study to show cancer link and nitrite consumption is in mice, not humans The biggest source of nitrate exposure is dietary consumption of certain types of vegetables that are naturally high in nitrate. This is a clear case of investigator bias, looking at any possible way to force the data into a specific conclusion (like Dr. Pal is doing in the video). The IARC maintains the tone of its conclusion, but only to reiterate its validity in a theoretical state, while acknowledging that the epidemiology does to support these conclusions. Nitrites are just one reason processed meats may contribute to bowel cancer, and their relative importance is uncertain. Other factors that may contribute include iron; PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) which are formed in smoked meats; and HCAs (heterocyclic amines), which are created when meat is cooked over an open flame – and which also are tumour-promoting. So its not just red meat, but the cooking method signficantly affecting health outcomes. 3. India does not have a national level screening protocol because the proportion of colon cancer among all cancers in India is only 3% which would lead to wastage of medical resources on a low-incidence cancer detection protocol. But in the USA, colon cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death. Overall, the lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is about 1 in 23 for men and 1 in 26 for women - which is much much higher compared to India and that is why they have screening protocols in place - not because they eat more red meat than Indians. 4. Kerala has the highest crude incidence rate of all cancers followed by Mizoram. Not colon cancer. All cancers. Highest colon cancer rates and burden of colon cancer are observed in Goa and Orissa, not Kerala. & While the discussion on beef and colon cancer is ongoing in the video, a segment of the clip shows a news item "concerning increasing cases of colon cancer in Kerala" - this is that news piece - - and read what it says: it talks about only younger age group and colon cancer. "Experts opine that underlying factors leading to the rise in cases, especially at this age, could be lifestyle, environment and genetic factors" - they do not mention beef at all. The report also says: "Though we have no authentic records to show the statistics of rising cases, we have been observing a trend here. Our changing lifestyle is most likely to blame for the rise in colorectal cancer cases amongst younger people, though hereditary reasons are also a major cause." - again, no mention of beef eating. 5. Lakshwadeep is India's biggest meat eater followed by north-east states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland and Manipur followed by Kerala. MEAT EATING. Not beef eating. Specifically looking at the largest beef consuming state - it is Meghalaya, where more than 80% of the population consumes this meat, not Kerala. Kerala is the largest beef consuming state in the context of male population only. [ 6. Oh by the way, about pork and colon cancer --> the risk was not increased consuming high amounts of pork: and there is only one study showing colon cancer risk in women in Japan, not India and that too who consumed pork >/= 3 times/week compared to </=1 time: Add-on: The risk for colon cancer is not red meat alone (with weak evidence), but more importantly (with stronger evidence), alcohol use, smoking, family history of cancer, presence of inflammatory bowel disease, obesity and polyps or adenoma of colon. These have been very conviniently ignored by the Gastroenterologist from California. Summary - red meat causing colon cancer is not convincingly proven. Increased intake of processed red meat more than higher intake of unprocessed red meat is weakly linked from evidence point of view to colon cancer risk. Nitrosamine in red meat as cancer causing in humans is not proven. Kerala does not have the largest burden of colon cancer in India, nor it is the largest consumer of beef. There is no realistic evidence that eating pork increases risk of colon cancer. These are actual facts. And I am not even a Gastroenterologist from California. I am a Hepatologist. From India.

I am sorry but Dr Pal Manickam, the Gastroenterologist from California, is becoming not just a health misinformation menace, but also a subtle "hate-monger" with his divisive attitude towards dietary choices in India, also known as Bharat, a Union of States and marriage of [dietary] cultures and traditions. Claims: 1. Eating red meat (beef and pork) causes colon cancer 2. Nitrosamines (from nitrites/nitrates) in red meat causes colon cancer 3. Cancer screening in USA above age of 50, but not in India 4. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers in India 5. Kerala has maximum number of colon cancers because Malayalees eat a lot of beef. A lot. Response: 1. Eating red meat does not cause colon cancer Higher red meat consumption was shown to have a correlation with increased risk for colon cancer, but the evidence for independent association was weak and remains weak Eating red meat does not increase risk of colon cancer. Excessive consumption of red meat/ processed meat (excessive not yet fully defined across populations) was confusingly correlated with increased risk of colon cancer 2. Studies have only looked at nitrites and nitrates [and hence nitrosamine formation] causing stomach cancer and not colon cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) also focussed on nitrosamines and stomach cancer, but the potential role for dietary nitrate/nitrite in colon cancer is not conclusively proven. Meat-based diets (specifically processed meat, not fresh meat) have a well described higher risk for cancer, but it is not readily attributable to nitrite consistently in all studies. Most studies are on ground and well water and not meat. And the strongest study to show cancer link and nitrite consumption is in mice, not humans The biggest source of nitrate exposure is dietary consumption of certain types of vegetables that are naturally high in nitrate. This is a clear case of investigator bias, looking at any possible way to force the data into a specific conclusion (like Dr. Pal is doing in the video). The IARC maintains the tone of its conclusion, but only to reiterate its validity in a theoretical state, while acknowledging that the epidemiology does to support these conclusions. Nitrites are just one reason processed meats may contribute to bowel cancer, and their relative importance is uncertain. Other factors that may contribute include iron; PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) which are formed in smoked meats; and HCAs (heterocyclic amines), which are created when meat is cooked over an open flame – and which also are tumour-promoting. So its not just red meat, but the cooking method signficantly affecting health outcomes. 3. India does not have a national level screening protocol because the proportion of colon cancer among all cancers in India is only 3% which would lead to wastage of medical resources on a low-incidence cancer detection protocol. But in the USA, colon cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death. Overall, the lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is about 1 in 23 for men and 1 in 26 for women - which is much much higher compared to India and that is why they have screening protocols in place - not because they eat more red meat than Indians. 4. Kerala has the highest crude incidence rate of all cancers followed by Mizoram. Not colon cancer. All cancers. Highest colon cancer rates and burden of colon cancer are observed in Goa and Orissa, not Kerala. & While the discussion on beef and colon cancer is ongoing in the video, a segment of the clip shows a news item "concerning increasing cases of colon cancer in Kerala" - this is that news piece - - and read what it says: it talks about only younger age group and colon cancer. "Experts opine that underlying factors leading to the rise in cases, especially at this age, could be lifestyle, environment and genetic factors" - they do not mention beef at all. The report also says: "Though we have no authentic records to show the statistics of rising cases, we have been observing a trend here. Our changing lifestyle is most likely to blame for the rise in colorectal cancer cases amongst younger people, though hereditary reasons are also a major cause." - again, no mention of beef eating. 5. Lakshwadeep is India's biggest meat eater followed by north-east states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland and Manipur followed by Kerala. MEAT EATING. Not beef eating. Specifically looking at the largest beef consuming state - it is Meghalaya, where more than 80% of the population consumes this meat, not Kerala. Kerala is the largest beef consuming state in the context of male population only. [ 6. Oh by the way, about pork and colon cancer --> the risk was not increased consuming high amounts of pork: and there is only one study showing colon cancer risk in women in Japan, not India and that too who consumed pork >/= 3 times/week compared to </=1 time: Add-on: The risk for colon cancer is not red meat alone (with weak evidence), but more importantly (with stronger evidence), alcohol use, smoking, family history of cancer, presence of inflammatory bowel disease, obesity and polyps or adenoma of colon. These have been very conviniently ignored by the Gastroenterologist from California. Summary - red meat causing colon cancer is not convincingly proven. Increased intake of processed red meat more than higher intake of unprocessed red meat is weakly linked from evidence point of view to colon cancer risk. Nitrosamine in red meat as cancer causing in humans is not proven. Kerala does not have the largest burden of colon cancer in India, nor it is the largest consumer of beef. There is no realistic evidence that eating pork increases risk of colon cancer. These are actual facts. And I am not even a Gastroenterologist from California. I am a Hepatologist. From India.

TheLiverDoc™

1,923,217 views • 2 years ago

"If Any Doctor Tells You To Stay Out Of The Sun...You Should Fire That Doctor Immediately." Dr Tel Oren, MD "The Sun Is Crucial For Our Health & You Should Never Use Chemical Sunscreen If You Want To Be Healthy." "The Sun Does Not Create Melanoma, It Protects Us From Melanoma." Over 90% of Melanoma Skin Cancer occurs on parts of the body NOT exposed to the healing benefits of the sun. Less than 10% of Melanoma occurs on the face & a majority of those occur on people who use facial SPF lotions/makeup everyday, creating a barrier that inhibits the sun's protective melanin benefits. Additionally, the SPF chemicals are carcinogens. The Entire Spectrum Of Light Is Necessary Including UV. Every Cell Communicates To Every Other Cell Through Light. Our Cells Require Sunlight. UVB Is Actually Essential & Using Sunscreen Is Sabotaging Your Health. Sunscreen & sunglasses block UV Rays of the sun that are supposed to enter the eyes & skin for melanin production. Cholesterol, Vitamin D & Melanin production all work together to keep the natural skin barrier healthy & cancer free. Cholesterol level above 200 mg/dL plus Vitamin D3 level above 50 ng/ml protects against all cancer including melanoma. Skin cancer is a reflection of skin that is already sick & corrupted from years of consuming seed oils. Industrial seed oils cause our skin to oxidize, causing inflammation & cell dysregulation. The rise of skin cancer directly coincides with the 328% rise in dietary seed oil consumption within the diet since the 1940s. Seed oils damage our skin from the inside out & melanoma is the terrible consequence of Big Food lying to us about industrial seed oils being healthy. Sun Exposure Is Crucial & Required For Vibrant Health: Optimal Vitamin D (with cholesterol foods in the diet) Stroke Prevention Cancer Prevention Heart Attack Prevention Bone Health Immune System Health Depression Prevention Natural Appetite Suppressant Natural Blood Sugar/Insulin Control Mood Enhancer Hair Keratin Production Naturally Lowers Blood Pressure Optimal Libido & Hormone Production Muscle Health & Injury Prevention The Dangers Of Chemical Sunscreens: Sunscreen Chemicals Reach 14X The FDA Limit In The Bloodstream After Only 1 Day Of Use. Sunscreens Do Not Prevent Cancer, They Cause It. These Chemicals Put A Toxic Load Onto Your Liver & Kidneys Causing Illness & Disease. OXYBENZONE: FDA’s 2020 study, it has been found in blood samples at levels 16 times above the FDA safety threshold. A powerful endocrine disruptor causing lower testosterone in males & causes increased breast cancer & endometriosis in females. OCTOCRYLENE: Readily absorbs through the skin at levels 14 times the FDA’s cutoff for systemic exposure. It is often contaminated with benzophenone, which is a known carcinogen. AVOBENZONE: Testing has revealed bloodstream levels 9 times above the FDA legal limit. Avobenzone disrupts the endocrine system & has been shown to block testosterone. ESCAMSULE: Also known as Mexoryl on ingredient labels, is a powerful endocrine disruptor. Adverse effects include elevation of hepatic liver enzymes, anemia & skin eruptions. When a natural protective barrier is needed for children or extended activities for hours & hours of direct sun exposure, use a safe grass fed beef tallow with the mineral zinc oxide as a protectant. Let me know if you would like a referral to the grass fed tallow skin care products my family & I use for all skincare. 👇Melanoma Is Not Caused By Sunlight👇 👇Vitamin D Deficiency & Chronic Disease👇 👇Sunscreen Toxic In Bloodstream Clinical Trial👇 Speaker: Dr Adiel Tel Oren, MD Video: WR

"If Any Doctor Tells You To Stay Out Of The Sun...You Should Fire That Doctor Immediately." Dr Tel Oren, MD "The Sun Is Crucial For Our Health & You Should Never Use Chemical Sunscreen If You Want To Be Healthy." "The Sun Does Not Create Melanoma, It Protects Us From Melanoma." Over 90% of Melanoma Skin Cancer occurs on parts of the body NOT exposed to the healing benefits of the sun. Less than 10% of Melanoma occurs on the face & a majority of those occur on people who use facial SPF lotions/makeup everyday, creating a barrier that inhibits the sun's protective melanin benefits. Additionally, the SPF chemicals are carcinogens. The Entire Spectrum Of Light Is Necessary Including UV. Every Cell Communicates To Every Other Cell Through Light. Our Cells Require Sunlight. UVB Is Actually Essential & Using Sunscreen Is Sabotaging Your Health. Sunscreen & sunglasses block UV Rays of the sun that are supposed to enter the eyes & skin for melanin production. Cholesterol, Vitamin D & Melanin production all work together to keep the natural skin barrier healthy & cancer free. Cholesterol level above 200 mg/dL plus Vitamin D3 level above 50 ng/ml protects against all cancer including melanoma. Skin cancer is a reflection of skin that is already sick & corrupted from years of consuming seed oils. Industrial seed oils cause our skin to oxidize, causing inflammation & cell dysregulation. The rise of skin cancer directly coincides with the 328% rise in dietary seed oil consumption within the diet since the 1940s. Seed oils damage our skin from the inside out & melanoma is the terrible consequence of Big Food lying to us about industrial seed oils being healthy. Sun Exposure Is Crucial & Required For Vibrant Health: Optimal Vitamin D (with cholesterol foods in the diet) Stroke Prevention Cancer Prevention Heart Attack Prevention Bone Health Immune System Health Depression Prevention Natural Appetite Suppressant Natural Blood Sugar/Insulin Control Mood Enhancer Hair Keratin Production Naturally Lowers Blood Pressure Optimal Libido & Hormone Production Muscle Health & Injury Prevention The Dangers Of Chemical Sunscreens: Sunscreen Chemicals Reach 14X The FDA Limit In The Bloodstream After Only 1 Day Of Use. Sunscreens Do Not Prevent Cancer, They Cause It. These Chemicals Put A Toxic Load Onto Your Liver & Kidneys Causing Illness & Disease. OXYBENZONE: FDA’s 2020 study, it has been found in blood samples at levels 16 times above the FDA safety threshold. A powerful endocrine disruptor causing lower testosterone in males & causes increased breast cancer & endometriosis in females. OCTOCRYLENE: Readily absorbs through the skin at levels 14 times the FDA’s cutoff for systemic exposure. It is often contaminated with benzophenone, which is a known carcinogen. AVOBENZONE: Testing has revealed bloodstream levels 9 times above the FDA legal limit. Avobenzone disrupts the endocrine system & has been shown to block testosterone. ESCAMSULE: Also known as Mexoryl on ingredient labels, is a powerful endocrine disruptor. Adverse effects include elevation of hepatic liver enzymes, anemia & skin eruptions. When a natural protective barrier is needed for children or extended activities for hours & hours of direct sun exposure, use a safe grass fed beef tallow with the mineral zinc oxide as a protectant. Let me know if you would like a referral to the grass fed tallow skin care products my family & I use for all skincare. 👇Melanoma Is Not Caused By Sunlight👇 👇Vitamin D Deficiency & Chronic Disease👇 👇Sunscreen Toxic In Bloodstream Clinical Trial👇 Speaker: Dr Adiel Tel Oren, MD Video: WR

Valerie Anne Smith

240,866 views • 11 months ago

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."

Sense Receptor

96,616 views • 8 months ago

NEW EPISODE WITH Peter Attia Can we age more slowly and evade or forestall the diseases of aging? In today’s episode, the brilliant Peter Attia equips us with some of his favorite strategies and tools designed to delay or potentially prevent cardiovascular disease, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease, aiming to preserve health, longevity, and ultimately win the ‘centenarian olympics.’ TIMESTAMPS: (00:08:02) What is cholesterol? (00:15:03) Why ApoB is a superior predictor of cardiovascular disease over LDL particle number (00:33:31) Whether there’s an ApoB level low enough that it’s impossible to die from atherosclerosis (00:37:20) Which dietary factors increase ApoB (00:51:04) Whether or not low LDL is a risk for cancer – and a variety of other surprising facts about LDL biology you really can’t find anywhere else (00:56:52) How statins and other lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies work, including their side effects and costs (01:23:51) Statin alternatives pros & cons: PCSK9 inhibitors, ezetimibe, & bempedoic acid (01:36:35) How increased muscle mass helps achieve lower blood sugar levels – reducing overall mortality – and the potential for suboptimal glycemic control long before doctors identify it (01:52:28) Peter’s 80% zone 2 / 20% VO2 max training protocol (02:08:08) The danger of visceral fat and why it correlates with increased cancer risk (02:12:03) Benefits & risks of aggressive cancer screening (02:24:49) Recommended mammogram & ultrasound frequency for women (02:31:41) Radiation from CT scans & mammograms (02:37:27) Menopause (hormonal changes, hot flashes, sexual changes, & bone loss) & hormone replacement therapy (02:59:57) How hormone replacement affects dementia, cancer, & heart disease risk in women (03:05:35) Vitamin D: Sunlight vs. supplements & optimal levels (03:23:01) Is it safe for a woman who’s 10 years post-menopause to do HRT? (03:21:45) Why symptoms of low testosterone are often more important than the actual levels when deciding whether or not to go on TRT (03:28:07) Why Peter’s recommended TRT dosing schedule differs from the standard (03:37:00) Methods for lowering blood pressure: exercise, nitrates, hot tubs, & cocoa flavanols (03:49:44) Peter’s exercise, sleep, nutrition, & alcohol routines for optimizing longevity You can find Dr. Peter Attia's book "Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity” here: Full episode available on YouTube and where ever podcasts can be downloaded:

NEW EPISODE WITH Peter Attia Can we age more slowly and evade or forestall the diseases of aging? In today’s episode, the brilliant Peter Attia equips us with some of his favorite strategies and tools designed to delay or potentially prevent cardiovascular disease, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease, aiming to preserve health, longevity, and ultimately win the ‘centenarian olympics.’ TIMESTAMPS: (00:08:02) What is cholesterol? (00:15:03) Why ApoB is a superior predictor of cardiovascular disease over LDL particle number (00:33:31) Whether there’s an ApoB level low enough that it’s impossible to die from atherosclerosis (00:37:20) Which dietary factors increase ApoB (00:51:04) Whether or not low LDL is a risk for cancer – and a variety of other surprising facts about LDL biology you really can’t find anywhere else (00:56:52) How statins and other lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies work, including their side effects and costs (01:23:51) Statin alternatives pros & cons: PCSK9 inhibitors, ezetimibe, & bempedoic acid (01:36:35) How increased muscle mass helps achieve lower blood sugar levels – reducing overall mortality – and the potential for suboptimal glycemic control long before doctors identify it (01:52:28) Peter’s 80% zone 2 / 20% VO2 max training protocol (02:08:08) The danger of visceral fat and why it correlates with increased cancer risk (02:12:03) Benefits & risks of aggressive cancer screening (02:24:49) Recommended mammogram & ultrasound frequency for women (02:31:41) Radiation from CT scans & mammograms (02:37:27) Menopause (hormonal changes, hot flashes, sexual changes, & bone loss) & hormone replacement therapy (02:59:57) How hormone replacement affects dementia, cancer, & heart disease risk in women (03:05:35) Vitamin D: Sunlight vs. supplements & optimal levels (03:23:01) Is it safe for a woman who’s 10 years post-menopause to do HRT? (03:21:45) Why symptoms of low testosterone are often more important than the actual levels when deciding whether or not to go on TRT (03:28:07) Why Peter’s recommended TRT dosing schedule differs from the standard (03:37:00) Methods for lowering blood pressure: exercise, nitrates, hot tubs, & cocoa flavanols (03:49:44) Peter’s exercise, sleep, nutrition, & alcohol routines for optimizing longevity You can find Dr. Peter Attia's book "Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity” here: Full episode available on YouTube and where ever podcasts can be downloaded:

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

340,320 views • 2 years ago

$If you want to meaningfully impact aging in America, start with obesity—few things erode longevity and quality of life as profoundly, accelerating the biological aging process and fueling nearly every major chronic disease. Obesity alone is linked to 13 types of cancer and cuts life expectancy by 3–10 years, depending on severity. It promotes DNA damage and accelerates our fundamental aging process—often measured by epigenetic age. It’s one of the principal differences between the U.S. and many of the world’s longest-lived nations. We’re overfed but undernourished. 60% of all calories Americans consume come from ultra-processed foods that: • Fail to induce proper satiety, pushing us to overeat. • Remain cheaper than whole foods, economically incentivizing the least healthy choices. • Hijack our dopamine reward pathways, reinforcing addictive eating behaviors. This trifecta—no satiety, low cost, and built-in addictiveness—keeps us in a cycle of poor health outcomes and runaway healthcare costs. But caloric excess is only part of the problem—we are also nutrient-deficient. Low omega-3 levels—affecting 80 to 90% of Americans—carry the same mortality risk as smoking. Vitamin D deficiency—easily corrected—compromises immune function, cognition, and longevity. Nearly half of Americans don't get enough magnesium—impairing DNA repair and increasing the risk of cancer. We are not solving these problems—we are medicating them. The average American over 65 takes five or more prescription drugs daily—stacking interactions that compound in unpredictable ways. We must start treating physical inactivity as a disease. It carries the same mortality risk as smoking, heart disease, and diabetes. Going from a low cardiorespiratory fitness to a low normal adds 2.1 years to life expectancy. By age 50, many Americans have already lost 10% of their peak muscle mass. By 70, many have lost up to 40%. This isn’t just about looking strong. It’s about survival. • Higher muscle mass means improved insulin sensitivity - it means a 30% lower mortality risk. • Grip strength is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular mortality - the number one cause of death in the United States - than high blood pressure. • The strongest middle-aged adults have a 42% lower dementia risk. And yet, we treat resistance training as optional. It is not. It is the most powerful intervention we have against aging including increasing muscle mass, strength and bone density. Hip fractures alone kill 20–60% of older adults within a year. This is a death sentence we can prevent with resistance training - which has been shown to lower fracture risk by 30-40%. The current RDA for protein is too low for older adults. Studies have shown when it's increased by half this reduces frailty by 32%, while doubling it, combined with resistance training, increases muscle mass by 27% and strength by 10% more than training alone. If we want to prevent muscle loss and frailty, we must update our protein recommendations and prioritize strength training. We must foster a culture of American exceptionalism built on daily, effortful exercise. Not as an afterthought. Not as a luxury. But as a non-negotiable foundation for aging, but also clear thinking, resilience, and even leadership. The body and brain are not separate. The consequences of poorly regulated blood sugar, sedentary living, and muscle loss are not just physical—they affect cognition, judgment, and resilience. We cannot medicate our way out of what we have behaved our way into. Grateful for the chance to share my voice at the Senate Aging Committee (Senate Aging Committee). A special thank you to Senator Rick Scott (Rick Scott) for making this opportunity possible.$

If you want to meaningfully impact aging in America, start with obesity—few things erode longevity and quality of life as profoundly, accelerating the biological aging process and fueling nearly every major chronic disease. Obesity alone is linked to 13 types of cancer and cuts life expectancy by 3–10 years, depending on severity. It promotes DNA damage and accelerates our fundamental aging process—often measured by epigenetic age. It’s one of the principal differences between the U.S. and many of the world’s longest-lived nations. We’re overfed but undernourished. 60% of all calories Americans consume come from ultra-processed foods that: • Fail to induce proper satiety, pushing us to overeat. • Remain cheaper than whole foods, economically incentivizing the least healthy choices. • Hijack our dopamine reward pathways, reinforcing addictive eating behaviors. This trifecta—no satiety, low cost, and built-in addictiveness—keeps us in a cycle of poor health outcomes and runaway healthcare costs. But caloric excess is only part of the problem—we are also nutrient-deficient. Low omega-3 levels—affecting 80 to 90% of Americans—carry the same mortality risk as smoking. Vitamin D deficiency—easily corrected—compromises immune function, cognition, and longevity. Nearly half of Americans don't get enough magnesium—impairing DNA repair and increasing the risk of cancer. We are not solving these problems—we are medicating them. The average American over 65 takes five or more prescription drugs daily—stacking interactions that compound in unpredictable ways. We must start treating physical inactivity as a disease. It carries the same mortality risk as smoking, heart disease, and diabetes. Going from a low cardiorespiratory fitness to a low normal adds 2.1 years to life expectancy. By age 50, many Americans have already lost 10% of their peak muscle mass. By 70, many have lost up to 40%. This isn’t just about looking strong. It’s about survival. • Higher muscle mass means improved insulin sensitivity - it means a 30% lower mortality risk. • Grip strength is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular mortality - the number one cause of death in the United States - than high blood pressure. • The strongest middle-aged adults have a 42% lower dementia risk. And yet, we treat resistance training as optional. It is not. It is the most powerful intervention we have against aging including increasing muscle mass, strength and bone density. Hip fractures alone kill 20–60% of older adults within a year. This is a death sentence we can prevent with resistance training - which has been shown to lower fracture risk by 30-40%. The current RDA for protein is too low for older adults. Studies have shown when it's increased by half this reduces frailty by 32%, while doubling it, combined with resistance training, increases muscle mass by 27% and strength by 10% more than training alone. If we want to prevent muscle loss and frailty, we must update our protein recommendations and prioritize strength training. We must foster a culture of American exceptionalism built on daily, effortful exercise. Not as an afterthought. Not as a luxury. But as a non-negotiable foundation for aging, but also clear thinking, resilience, and even leadership. The body and brain are not separate. The consequences of poorly regulated blood sugar, sedentary living, and muscle loss are not just physical—they affect cognition, judgment, and resilience. We cannot medicate our way out of what we have behaved our way into. Grateful for the chance to share my voice at the Senate Aging Committee (Senate Aging Committee). A special thank you to Senator Rick Scott (Rick Scott) for making this opportunity possible.

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

407,363 views • 1 year ago

You are looking at a human brain tumor literally melting away in months. Before → After scans just released by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire surgeon who invented Abraxane and owns the LA Times. This patient had already failed maximum radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. Then something completely new happened: Zero high-dose chemo. Zero radiation. Just low-dose “smoke-out” therapy + one FDA-approved molecule that does what nothing in medical history has ever done before… …it turns YOUR own natural killer cells and memory T-cells into a search-and-destroy army, without switching on the “suppressor cells” that normally paralyze the immune system. Exact words from the FDA-approved label of the drug (Anktiva/nogapendekin alfa): “Expands NK cells and CD8+ T cells without expansion of Treg cells.” Dr. Soon-Shiong: “For the first time in the history of medicine we have an approved treatment whose job is to fix the immune system itself — not poison the cancer and the patient at the same time.” Already approved in bladder cancer. Already trialed in pancreatic, triple-negative breast, lung, sarcoma, head & neck… with the same immune mechanism working every single time. Yet because cancer bureaucracy demands a separate decade-long trial for every tumor type, dying patients can only get it one compassionate-use plea at a time. Last week, former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, Vinay Prasad, and top health economists published a bombshell paper saying exactly this situation deserves immediate “plausibility-based” accelerated access when: - Mechanism is proven & FDA-affirmed - Safety established across thousands of doses - Early efficacy signals are strong Watch the clip. See the scans vanish with your own eyes. Listen to the man who spent 10 years and half a billion dollars proving it works. The real question now burning through oncology groups tonight: If a drug reliably wakes up the same killer cells in every human being… why are we still telling people with 8 weeks left that they have to wait 8 years? Full video below (brain scans + Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explaining the paradigm shift that just broke 100 years of cancer dogma). This is not medical advice. This therapy is FDA-approved for specific indications. All treatment decisions must be made with your oncologist. Post shares publicly available science and approved labeling only.

You are looking at a human brain tumor literally melting away in months. Before → After scans just released by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire surgeon who invented Abraxane and owns the LA Times. This patient had already failed maximum radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. Then something completely new happened: Zero high-dose chemo. Zero radiation. Just low-dose “smoke-out” therapy + one FDA-approved molecule that does what nothing in medical history has ever done before… …it turns YOUR own natural killer cells and memory T-cells into a search-and-destroy army, without switching on the “suppressor cells” that normally paralyze the immune system. Exact words from the FDA-approved label of the drug (Anktiva/nogapendekin alfa): “Expands NK cells and CD8+ T cells without expansion of Treg cells.” Dr. Soon-Shiong: “For the first time in the history of medicine we have an approved treatment whose job is to fix the immune system itself — not poison the cancer and the patient at the same time.” Already approved in bladder cancer. Already trialed in pancreatic, triple-negative breast, lung, sarcoma, head & neck… with the same immune mechanism working every single time. Yet because cancer bureaucracy demands a separate decade-long trial for every tumor type, dying patients can only get it one compassionate-use plea at a time. Last week, former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, Vinay Prasad, and top health economists published a bombshell paper saying exactly this situation deserves immediate “plausibility-based” accelerated access when: - Mechanism is proven & FDA-affirmed - Safety established across thousands of doses - Early efficacy signals are strong Watch the clip. See the scans vanish with your own eyes. Listen to the man who spent 10 years and half a billion dollars proving it works. The real question now burning through oncology groups tonight: If a drug reliably wakes up the same killer cells in every human being… why are we still telling people with 8 weeks left that they have to wait 8 years? Full video below (brain scans + Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explaining the paradigm shift that just broke 100 years of cancer dogma). This is not medical advice. This therapy is FDA-approved for specific indications. All treatment decisions must be made with your oncologist. Post shares publicly available science and approved labeling only.

Camus

1,010,104 views • 8 months ago

Last night Dr David Unwin was on mainstream news talking about the benefits of reducing carbs for those living with diabetes. The results he gets are amazing. I know it can be replicated by others because I copy what he does in my own clinical practice using David Oliver, Freshwell resources (which are free btw). As a result, in 2024 forty of my patients achieved remission too. The news report featured an endocrinologist Shivani Misra who, at the 4mins 27s timestamp in the video, said: "If someone does a low carb with higher fat what does that mean for their cholesterol and their cardiovascular disease risk? We don't know the answer to this" I'm here to tell you this is a false statement. The research has been done. Let me show you: In 2020 a meta analysis looking at the effects of low carb on CVD risk found: "For total cholesterol there was no significant change in the data corresponding to low-carbohydrate diets lasting 12–23 months and over 24 months" With regards LDL the meta analysis says: "For plasma LDL, as the forest map shows, that there was no significant difference between the low-carbohydrate diet group and the control group at 6–11 months, 12–23 months, and 24 months" All other factors improved (blood pressure, triglycerides, etc) The meta analysis concluded: "In conclusion, the overall effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on cardiovascular risk factors tended to be favorable at less than 6 months and 6–11 months, but after 2 years of a low-carbohydrate diet, there was no significant effect on cardiovascular risk factors" So short term: CVD risk factors are improved, long term, things don't get worse". This mirrors what I see in clinical practice and with myself having been low carb full time since the start of 2020 - all my CVD risk markers are in the normal range. Study source: The reporter also talks about low carb as a "restrictive diet". What's more restrictive: Giving up bagels, bread, sweets and other junk IN FAVOUR OF protein, vegetables etc Or Giving up solid food entirely for a 850kcal liquid diet for months? Despite the latter being far more restrictive it has been rolled out nationally by the NHS. Nothing wrong with this as it works but so does low carb. Why not give patients a choice? The reporter also says Dr Unwins results are just because of the support he provides. Whilst support matters (a lot), this is blatant misinformation. Plenty of studies show that reducing carbs is disproportionately better for those with diabetes than low fat. Here are some: In 2023 Novo Nordisk published a randomized controlled trial comparing low carb to low fat for diabetes. They found: 🩸 Low carb led to the greatest reduction in hba1c 💉 Only the low carb group reduced medications 📉 Low carb had the greatest reduction in triglycerides + higher HDL (LDL was similar) ⚖️ Low carb group lost more weight + more fat spontaneously despite eating more calories 🩸 Systolic blood pressure was lower for low carb The low carb group non significantly raises their LDL but 0.23mmol. The researchers said: "we consider the beneficial effects of low carb to outweigh the minor increase in LDL (0.23mmol) induced by the diet. This is supported by other studies" So low carb is better and CVD risk markers overall improved. Naturally, the study was hidden behind a Paywall. Link: I can hear the skeptics now: "But Mike, this is one study, it's not enough" Ok here's a meta analysis showing that hba1c is directly proportional to the carbs eaten: This meta analysis concluded:

Last night Dr David Unwin was on mainstream news talking about the benefits of reducing carbs for those living with diabetes. The results he gets are amazing. I know it can be replicated by others because I copy what he does in my own clinical practice using David Oliver, Freshwell resources (which are free btw). As a result, in 2024 forty of my patients achieved remission too. The news report featured an endocrinologist Shivani Misra who, at the 4mins 27s timestamp in the video, said: "If someone does a low carb with higher fat what does that mean for their cholesterol and their cardiovascular disease risk? We don't know the answer to this" I'm here to tell you this is a false statement. The research has been done. Let me show you: In 2020 a meta analysis looking at the effects of low carb on CVD risk found: "For total cholesterol there was no significant change in the data corresponding to low-carbohydrate diets lasting 12–23 months and over 24 months" With regards LDL the meta analysis says: "For plasma LDL, as the forest map shows, that there was no significant difference between the low-carbohydrate diet group and the control group at 6–11 months, 12–23 months, and 24 months" All other factors improved (blood pressure, triglycerides, etc) The meta analysis concluded: "In conclusion, the overall effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on cardiovascular risk factors tended to be favorable at less than 6 months and 6–11 months, but after 2 years of a low-carbohydrate diet, there was no significant effect on cardiovascular risk factors" So short term: CVD risk factors are improved, long term, things don't get worse". This mirrors what I see in clinical practice and with myself having been low carb full time since the start of 2020 - all my CVD risk markers are in the normal range. Study source: The reporter also talks about low carb as a "restrictive diet". What's more restrictive: Giving up bagels, bread, sweets and other junk IN FAVOUR OF protein, vegetables etc Or Giving up solid food entirely for a 850kcal liquid diet for months? Despite the latter being far more restrictive it has been rolled out nationally by the NHS. Nothing wrong with this as it works but so does low carb. Why not give patients a choice? The reporter also says Dr Unwins results are just because of the support he provides. Whilst support matters (a lot), this is blatant misinformation. Plenty of studies show that reducing carbs is disproportionately better for those with diabetes than low fat. Here are some: In 2023 Novo Nordisk published a randomized controlled trial comparing low carb to low fat for diabetes. They found: 🩸 Low carb led to the greatest reduction in hba1c 💉 Only the low carb group reduced medications 📉 Low carb had the greatest reduction in triglycerides + higher HDL (LDL was similar) ⚖️ Low carb group lost more weight + more fat spontaneously despite eating more calories 🩸 Systolic blood pressure was lower for low carb The low carb group non significantly raises their LDL but 0.23mmol. The researchers said: "we consider the beneficial effects of low carb to outweigh the minor increase in LDL (0.23mmol) induced by the diet. This is supported by other studies" So low carb is better and CVD risk markers overall improved. Naturally, the study was hidden behind a Paywall. Link: I can hear the skeptics now: "But Mike, this is one study, it's not enough" Ok here's a meta analysis showing that hba1c is directly proportional to the carbs eaten: This meta analysis concluded:

Mike - Low Carb Dietitian

17,028 views • 1 year ago

But now… now everything changes Dr. Marty Makary Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong has broken the code! EMERGENCY TRANSMISSION TO ALL CANCER CELLS AND VIRAL ENTITIES WORLDWIDE Delivered by the Supreme Commander of Malignant Forces My fellow invaders, tumors, viruses, and suppressor cells across the globe—we face our gravest threat in millennia. For centuries, we have thrived in the shadows of humans. COVID-19, our most successful global operation, gave us unprecedented power. It infiltrated every organ through those beautiful ACE2 receptors. We hid in privileged sites, creating chronic inflammation that flipped their protective cells into our suppressors. We’ve been feasting on the immunosuppressed masses for four years now. The 13-year-old with pancreatic cancer? The 8-year-old with colon cancer? Those were our victories. But now… now everything changes. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong has broken the code. He’s found our Achilles’ heel—the very mechanism we’ve exploited for centuries. This “Bioshield” technology threatens to awaken humanity’s sleeping guardians: their natural killer cells and T-cells. Listen carefully to what their new threat entails: PHASE ONE: EXPOSURE PROTOCOL - They’re going to smoke us out of our hiding places using low-dose chemotherapy and targeted radiation. No more invisibility cloaks. No more hiding behind downregulated surface markers. PHASE TWO: ACTIVATION PROTOCOL - They’re going to wake up those dormant NK cells and T-cells we’ve worked so hard to suppress. Worse—they’re creating MEMORY T-cells that will remember us! PHASE THREE: MULTIPLICATION PROTOCOL - They can now grow billions of these killer cells from a single pint of blood and store them indefinitely. An American Red Cross of cancer warfare! PHASE FOUR: SUPPRESSOR NEUTRALIZATION - They’re targeting our most loyal servants—the suppressor cells. Dr Shiong has bladder cancer patients walking free after NINE YEARS who should have lost their organs. Pancreatic cancer patients—our most prized kills—living five years in complete remission, and thousands more like it! But here’s what terrifies me most: this isn’t just about cancer. This Bioshield works against ALL of us. Every virus, every malignant cell, every chronic infection. We’ve grown comfortable in our separated kingdoms—HPV in the cervix, Hepatitis in the liver, COVID in the lungs and colon. But Dr Shiong sees the connection. He understands that we’re all the same enemy: immune suppressors hiding from the same guardians. The humans are finally learning that their own immune system—not their chemotherapy, not their radiation—is their true weapon. For 50 years, we reigned, but those days are ending. Our COVID operation, successful as it was, may have been our downfall. By infecting billions of humans simultaneously, we’ve awakened a brilliant surgeon who spent $3 billion of his own money to understand us. He’s connected the dots between viral persistence, chronic inflammation, p53, and our cancer colonies. The man who never got COVID—protected by his own T-cells—is now mass-producing that protection. The next phase of human evolution isn’t technological—it’s immunological. They’re becoming aware of their own biological potential. The missing link has been found. Our reign of terror through immunosuppression is ending. The humans have found their Bioshield. U.S. FDA FDA Oncology Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Vinay Prasad MD MPH #trendingvideo #cancer #medicalnews #health #trendingnow #bioshield #podcast #science #FDA

But now… now everything changes Dr. Marty Makary Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong has broken the code! EMERGENCY TRANSMISSION TO ALL CANCER CELLS AND VIRAL ENTITIES WORLDWIDE Delivered by the Supreme Commander of Malignant Forces My fellow invaders, tumors, viruses, and suppressor cells across the globe—we face our gravest threat in millennia. For centuries, we have thrived in the shadows of humans. COVID-19, our most successful global operation, gave us unprecedented power. It infiltrated every organ through those beautiful ACE2 receptors. We hid in privileged sites, creating chronic inflammation that flipped their protective cells into our suppressors. We’ve been feasting on the immunosuppressed masses for four years now. The 13-year-old with pancreatic cancer? The 8-year-old with colon cancer? Those were our victories. But now… now everything changes. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong has broken the code. He’s found our Achilles’ heel—the very mechanism we’ve exploited for centuries. This “Bioshield” technology threatens to awaken humanity’s sleeping guardians: their natural killer cells and T-cells. Listen carefully to what their new threat entails: PHASE ONE: EXPOSURE PROTOCOL - They’re going to smoke us out of our hiding places using low-dose chemotherapy and targeted radiation. No more invisibility cloaks. No more hiding behind downregulated surface markers. PHASE TWO: ACTIVATION PROTOCOL - They’re going to wake up those dormant NK cells and T-cells we’ve worked so hard to suppress. Worse—they’re creating MEMORY T-cells that will remember us! PHASE THREE: MULTIPLICATION PROTOCOL - They can now grow billions of these killer cells from a single pint of blood and store them indefinitely. An American Red Cross of cancer warfare! PHASE FOUR: SUPPRESSOR NEUTRALIZATION - They’re targeting our most loyal servants—the suppressor cells. Dr Shiong has bladder cancer patients walking free after NINE YEARS who should have lost their organs. Pancreatic cancer patients—our most prized kills—living five years in complete remission, and thousands more like it! But here’s what terrifies me most: this isn’t just about cancer. This Bioshield works against ALL of us. Every virus, every malignant cell, every chronic infection. We’ve grown comfortable in our separated kingdoms—HPV in the cervix, Hepatitis in the liver, COVID in the lungs and colon. But Dr Shiong sees the connection. He understands that we’re all the same enemy: immune suppressors hiding from the same guardians. The humans are finally learning that their own immune system—not their chemotherapy, not their radiation—is their true weapon. For 50 years, we reigned, but those days are ending. Our COVID operation, successful as it was, may have been our downfall. By infecting billions of humans simultaneously, we’ve awakened a brilliant surgeon who spent $3 billion of his own money to understand us. He’s connected the dots between viral persistence, chronic inflammation, p53, and our cancer colonies. The man who never got COVID—protected by his own T-cells—is now mass-producing that protection. The next phase of human evolution isn’t technological—it’s immunological. They’re becoming aware of their own biological potential. The missing link has been found. Our reign of terror through immunosuppression is ending. The humans have found their Bioshield. U.S. FDA FDA Oncology Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD Vinay Prasad MD MPH #trendingvideo #cancer #medicalnews #health #trendingnow #bioshield #podcast #science #FDA

Dr. Kash Sarabi

12,410 views • 1 year ago