Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Does anyone know who Warren Smith is? This guy makes a 10 minute Youtube video just flat out lying about the Candace Owens x Andrew Wilson Debate! He NEVER mentions any of Andrew's blunders, bloopers, lies, and embarrassing moments. AT ALL. Like he didn't even include it in the... show more
51,686 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)
40 Kommentare

I would be happy to discuss this with you.

Im attempting to message but dont see an option. Did you unfollow? Message if you can.

I just messaged you. We can talk right now

Responded

You’re just dumb man. Stop it. Find a new hobby.

Dumb? Jake...I like ya content, bro. But dont behave like the Left and resort to ad hominem. Its low iq and beneath you. Stop blindly following Andrew (this weird obsession you have) and accept my PUBLIC CHALLENGE to debate. Whataya say? Should be a walk in the park just like it was for Andrew. 💀 🤡

🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂

Hey Rachel, ask your husband directly or Warren about this debate challenge though...

This debate is an IQ test. You lost.

You accused him of lying and then spent the entire post describing an omission. Those are different charges. Lying requires a false statement. You didn't produce one. Not a sentence, not a timestamp, not a single claim he made that isn't true. What you produced is a list of things he didn't cover. That's a scope complaint wearing a fraud accusation's clothes. "He NEVER mentions Andrew's blunders." Correct. The video is called The Moment Andrew Wilson Proved Candace Owens Has No Evidence. It is about a moment. You're angry that a video about one moment isn't a scorecard for three and a half hours. You supplied the word "assessment" yourself and then convicted him of failing a standard you invented in the same breath. Now the good part. Hundreds of people are already tagging him, and in the very next line you ask people to go tag him. If hundreds were already doing it you wouldn't need the ask. The ask is the tell. And look at what they're allegedly saying. That you are challenging him. You didn't challenge him. You arranged for other people to say you did, then requested more of them. If you want to debate the man, type the sentence. It's four words and you've written two hundred avoiding them. "Is he compromised? Biased? Or just a liar?" Three doors, all locked from the same side. You left out the fourth, which is that he watched the same debate and came to a conclusion you don't like. "I used to respect this guy." Everyone who types that sentence types it about someone who just disagreed with them. It costs nothing. It's the receipt you print when you don't have one. "Does anyone know who Warren Smith is." You do. You know the runtime, you know what he left out, you know what's in his comment section. Opening with feigned ignorance and then demonstrating encyclopedic familiarity in the next six lines isn't the move you think it is. 202K views, incidentally. That's the guy nobody knows. Name the lie. One. Timestamp it.

Who is he? More like who the fuck are you?

Normal people watching the debate felt the same way @WTSmith17 felt. you candy cane suckers are just retarded. 😂

Yeah, I’ve been following him for a while, until this video he put out yesterday. I thought he was intelligent and capable of rational thought, and I was wrong.

They’re melting down

Yea, I watched 2 minutes and couldn't get past his lying

He was a former Harvard professor that got fired for sharing respectful conversations with his students about current events using logic a reason and got labeled a right wing.

He's is popular in certain streams , he usually is a even keeled person. I haven't seen his critique but I have noticed that lower level influencers are realizing that if they go after Candace by default you will get exposure. So I chalk this up to a publicity stunt nothing more.

Candace is making claims. Claims require evidence, of which she has little to none. She herself backed away from multiple claims she'd previously made.

Ooof. You let your lying heart show with a contradiction. You start off by saying "does anyone know who this guy is?" then end it by saying "I used to like this guy". So fucking dishonest....Anyhoo, Warren Smith is saying nothing but true things. He is pretty good with logic.

Lol "dude who struggles with the English language doesn't know who @WTSmith17 is". You're outta your league homie.

You've not viewing Warren's assessments objectively, Demetrious. He's not taking a side, per se, but evaluating the issues against Candace's own perspectives (as she plainly stated). Moreover, read your comment section; your followers routinely cite one is "paid" in order to defeat clear explanatory reasoning -- which is lazy rationale on its face. Argumentation sciences don't work that way, never have and hopefully never will in a real-world (general) context. More succinctly, to quote Carl Sagan: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (as an aphorism, The Sagan Standard). Candace plainly states: "Zero percent" (in response to PBD's question regarding certainty that Robinson shot CK). And THAT, my friend, is an "extraordinary claim" requiring more than an, 'I just don't believe it' response.

Can you inform me of Andrew's blunders, bloopers, lies, and embarrassing moments. I'll give you the slip at the end on the charges, however, that had absolutely nothing to do with the debate so not sure why it would affect his argument in any way? Everything else was completely sound

@robnoerr and @RyanCMullally were both there helping Andrew crush Candace. Both are more than happy to take on critiques.

Name one lie Warren told? It’s unbelievable that people don’t see the pattern. As soon as anybody disagrees with or challenges, the Candace cult they are asserted to be shills for TPUSA or Zionists in spite of any evidence to the contrary.

Yeah. Warren is awesome too. He actually counts the questions about the charges against Andrew, which I imagine he would accept. BUT, he’s not wrong about Candace. Chick is a fucking loon.

You want a debate someone but you don't even know the rules of a simple debate you simply think that Candice won that debate when every single AI non-biased system says that Andrew Wilson did because they both needed to show evidence you're just trying to grift

I watched his take yesterday and it infuriated me. I also liked him but he made no sense in his video breakdown of the debate clips he chose.

Hey @WTSmith17 are you interested in debating this retard?

I imagine someone offered him some money…

Bro why you always sound like you're about to cry? Just admit Candace is a retard that caters to retards like yourself. The bitch had zero evidence and said Charlie didn't even get shot with a bullet 💀

Because any bloopers or blenders are irrelevant to the fact that she did not have one shred of evidence or anything to back up all of the series and accusations that she has spread over this past year. She literally said that they are her opinions that she’s allowed to think them.

I saw his video and immediately knew he didn't watch the debate. He is taking clips someone else edited an he responded to the clips. So I think he is another one that was paid for his opinion of Wilson.

This dude always rubbed me the wrong way. I'm glad to see why I never subscribed

Don’t waste your time. He is definitely compromised. the Hasbara campaign is currently capturing as many influencers and podcasters as they can so if someone suddenly changes, they’re already cooked and we should abandon them.

I can lie to you But I can’t believe it for you Candace Owens

@WTSmith17 I don’t think this dude knows who you are. Set up the debate..LFG

What did he lie about? I’ve not seen the video but it’s like this- Candace didn’t show any evidence- NONE. Candace couldn’t back anything coming out of her mouth. She can’t even prove the receipt & the owner of the restaurant says Candace is LYING! F Candace. She’s a damn liar.

@WTSmith17 come on man. Show us all how foolish you are. Let’s find another Andrew pickles

Just saw part of the debate from J. What a disrespectful cunt @WTSmith17 has become.

Warren has been on Rogan and is well known, who are you is the better question.
Ähnliche Videos
Sensitive content
🚨JUST IN: One of the "victims" in Andrew Tate's case comes out in his defense. Btw, the same girl he hit with a belt in a viral video.👀 "He would never do anything like this. He is innocent. He is not a human tr*ff*cker, and he would never r*pe anybody." "It is so false that it's upsetting. I know him, he does not deserve any of this." The UK and Romania paint this girl as a victim of se*ual abuse and human tr*ff*cking, and as the "minor" in the case files, despite her denying all of these allegations. The whole case is a setup, and the victims are made up.
Prime Tate
300,026 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
