Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Does anyone know who Warren Smith is? This guy makes a 10 minute Youtube video just flat out lying about the Candace Owens x Andrew Wilson Debate! He NEVER mentions any of Andrew's blunders, bloopers, lies, and embarrassing moments. AT ALL. Like he didn't even include it in the...

51,686 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

40 Kommentare

Profilbild von Warren Smith
Warren Smithvor 29 Tagen

I would be happy to discuss this with you.

Profilbild von DDGotAPodcast
DDGotAPodcastvor 29 Tagen

Im attempting to message but dont see an option. Did you unfollow? Message if you can.

Profilbild von Warren Smith
Warren Smithvor 29 Tagen

I just messaged you. We can talk right now

Profilbild von DDGotAPodcast
DDGotAPodcastvor 29 Tagen

Responded

Profilbild von Jake Rattlesnake
Jake Rattlesnakevor 29 Tagen

You’re just dumb man. Stop it. Find a new hobby.

Profilbild von DDGotAPodcast
DDGotAPodcastvor 29 Tagen

Dumb? Jake...I like ya content, bro. But dont behave like the Left and resort to ad hominem. Its low iq and beneath you. Stop blindly following Andrew (this weird obsession you have) and accept my PUBLIC CHALLENGE to debate. Whataya say? Should be a walk in the park just like it was for Andrew. 💀 🤡

Profilbild von Rachel Wilson
Rachel Wilsonvor 1 Monat

🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂

Profilbild von DDGotAPodcast
DDGotAPodcastvor 1 Monat

Hey Rachel, ask your husband directly or Warren about this debate challenge though...

Profilbild von KingBugs
KingBugsvor 1 Monat

This debate is an IQ test. You lost.

Profilbild von EmberVoid
EmberVoidvor 1 Monat

You accused him of lying and then spent the entire post describing an omission. Those are different charges. Lying requires a false statement. You didn't produce one. Not a sentence, not a timestamp, not a single claim he made that isn't true. What you produced is a list of things he didn't cover. That's a scope complaint wearing a fraud accusation's clothes. "He NEVER mentions Andrew's blunders." Correct. The video is called The Moment Andrew Wilson Proved Candace Owens Has No Evidence. It is about a moment. You're angry that a video about one moment isn't a scorecard for three and a half hours. You supplied the word "assessment" yourself and then convicted him of failing a standard you invented in the same breath. Now the good part. Hundreds of people are already tagging him, and in the very next line you ask people to go tag him. If hundreds were already doing it you wouldn't need the ask. The ask is the tell. And look at what they're allegedly saying. That you are challenging him. You didn't challenge him. You arranged for other people to say you did, then requested more of them. If you want to debate the man, type the sentence. It's four words and you've written two hundred avoiding them. "Is he compromised? Biased? Or just a liar?" Three doors, all locked from the same side. You left out the fourth, which is that he watched the same debate and came to a conclusion you don't like. "I used to respect this guy." Everyone who types that sentence types it about someone who just disagreed with them. It costs nothing. It's the receipt you print when you don't have one. "Does anyone know who Warren Smith is." You do. You know the runtime, you know what he left out, you know what's in his comment section. Opening with feigned ignorance and then demonstrating encyclopedic familiarity in the next six lines isn't the move you think it is. 202K views, incidentally. That's the guy nobody knows. Name the lie. One. Timestamp it.

Profilbild von Troll
Trollvor 1 Monat

Who is he? More like who the fuck are you?

Profilbild von Elcí Mcguire
Elcí Mcguirevor 29 Tagen

Normal people watching the debate felt the same way @WTSmith17 felt. you candy cane suckers are just retarded. 😂

Profilbild von Hepzibah_Splurge
Hepzibah_Splurgevor 1 Monat

Yeah, I’ve been following him for a while, until this video he put out yesterday. I thought he was intelligent and capable of rational thought, and I was wrong.

Profilbild von San
Sanvor 29 Tagen

They’re melting down

Profilbild von Martian apologist (whelmed)
Martian apologist (whelmed)vor 1 Monat

Yea, I watched 2 minutes and couldn't get past his lying

Profilbild von Buckfury25
Buckfury25vor 1 Monat

He was a former Harvard professor that got fired for sharing respectful conversations with his students about current events using logic a reason and got labeled a right wing.

Profilbild von Chris Miller
Chris Millervor 1 Monat

He's is popular in certain streams , he usually is a even keeled person. I haven't seen his critique but I have noticed that lower level influencers are realizing that if they go after Candace by default you will get exposure. So I chalk this up to a publicity stunt nothing more.

Profilbild von ᗪIᔕᑕOᑌᑎT ᗰᗩGIᑕIᗩᑎ 🎩🐇
ᗪIᔕᑕOᑌᑎT ᗰᗩGIᑕIᗩᑎ 🎩🐇vor 29 Tagen

Candace is making claims. Claims require evidence, of which she has little to none. She herself backed away from multiple claims she'd previously made.

Profilbild von Roughneck Jarhead
Roughneck Jarheadvor 1 Monat

Ooof. You let your lying heart show with a contradiction. You start off by saying "does anyone know who this guy is?" then end it by saying "I used to like this guy". So fucking dishonest....Anyhoo, Warren Smith is saying nothing but true things. He is pretty good with logic.

Profilbild von DieselDingus1
DieselDingus1vor 1 Monat

Lol "dude who struggles with the English language doesn't know who @WTSmith17 is". You're outta your league homie.

Profilbild von Narratives Film | Research
Narratives Film | Researchvor 29 Tagen

You've not viewing Warren's assessments objectively, Demetrious. He's not taking a side, per se, but evaluating the issues against Candace's own perspectives (as she plainly stated). Moreover, read your comment section; your followers routinely cite one is "paid" in order to defeat clear explanatory reasoning -- which is lazy rationale on its face. Argumentation sciences don't work that way, never have and hopefully never will in a real-world (general) context. More succinctly, to quote Carl Sagan: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (as an aphorism, The Sagan Standard). Candace plainly states: "Zero percent" (in response to PBD's question regarding certainty that Robinson shot CK). And THAT, my friend, is an "extraordinary claim" requiring more than an, 'I just don't believe it' response.

Profilbild von cw
cwvor 1 Monat

Can you inform me of Andrew's blunders, bloopers, lies, and embarrassing moments. I'll give you the slip at the end on the charges, however, that had absolutely nothing to do with the debate so not sure why it would affect his argument in any way? Everything else was completely sound

Profilbild von AverageDebateEnjoyer
AverageDebateEnjoyervor 1 Monat

@robnoerr and @RyanCMullally were both there helping Andrew crush Candace. Both are more than happy to take on critiques.

Profilbild von The Way
The Wayvor 29 Tagen

Name one lie Warren told? It’s unbelievable that people don’t see the pattern. As soon as anybody disagrees with or challenges, the Candace cult they are asserted to be shills for TPUSA or Zionists in spite of any evidence to the contrary.

Profilbild von Dan Boots (brilliant/handsome/hilarious)
Dan Boots (brilliant/handsome/hilarious)vor 29 Tagen

Yeah. Warren is awesome too. He actually counts the questions about the charges against Andrew, which I imagine he would accept. BUT, he’s not wrong about Candace. Chick is a fucking loon.

Profilbild von Mike
Mikevor 1 Monat

You want a debate someone but you don't even know the rules of a simple debate you simply think that Candice won that debate when every single AI non-biased system says that Andrew Wilson did because they both needed to show evidence you're just trying to grift

Profilbild von MolotovvvBlonde
MolotovvvBlondevor 1 Monat

I watched his take yesterday and it infuriated me. I also liked him but he made no sense in his video breakdown of the debate clips he chose.

Profilbild von Cringe Core Records
Cringe Core Recordsvor 1 Monat

Hey @WTSmith17 are you interested in debating this retard?

Profilbild von Jsimmons
Jsimmonsvor 1 Monat

I imagine someone offered him some money…

Profilbild von Pete Burns
Pete Burnsvor 1 Monat

Bro why you always sound like you're about to cry? Just admit Candace is a retard that caters to retards like yourself. The bitch had zero evidence and said Charlie didn't even get shot with a bullet 💀

Profilbild von LaLa🥀☠️✨
LaLa🥀☠️✨vor 29 Tagen

Because any bloopers or blenders are irrelevant to the fact that she did not have one shred of evidence or anything to back up all of the series and accusations that she has spread over this past year. She literally said that they are her opinions that she’s allowed to think them.

Profilbild von sta
stavor 1 Monat

I saw his video and immediately knew he didn't watch the debate. He is taking clips someone else edited an he responded to the clips. So I think he is another one that was paid for his opinion of Wilson.

Profilbild von Co Co
Co Covor 1 Monat

This dude always rubbed me the wrong way. I'm glad to see why I never subscribed

Profilbild von NoWaKnowSo
NoWaKnowSovor 1 Monat

Don’t waste your time. He is definitely compromised. the Hasbara campaign is currently capturing as many influencers and podcasters as they can so if someone suddenly changes, they’re already cooked and we should abandon them.

Profilbild von Kilo Victor Lima
Kilo Victor Limavor 1 Monat

I can lie to you But I can’t believe it for you Candace Owens

Profilbild von DailyBreakfast__
DailyBreakfast__vor 1 Monat

@WTSmith17 I don’t think this dude knows who you are. Set up the debate..LFG

Profilbild von ElleElvira
ElleElviravor 1 Monat

What did he lie about? I’ve not seen the video but it’s like this- Candace didn’t show any evidence- NONE. Candace couldn’t back anything coming out of her mouth. She can’t even prove the receipt & the owner of the restaurant says Candace is LYING! F Candace. She’s a damn liar.

Profilbild von Secret Rare Waffles
Secret Rare Wafflesvor 1 Monat

@WTSmith17 come on man. Show us all how foolish you are. Let’s find another Andrew pickles

Profilbild von Latina
Latinavor 29 Tagen

Just saw part of the debate from J. What a disrespectful cunt @WTSmith17 has become.

Profilbild von Jimiman
Jimimanvor 29 Tagen

Warren has been on Rogan and is well known, who are you is the better question.

Ähnliche Videos

So Andrew Wilson is currently live on YouTube after stating that he would release the text messages of Charlie Kirk claiming "the Left" was going to kill him (the very thing Erika Kirk said didn't exist months ago btw). There are a few important things to note about this live stream that I think you'd find disturbing. Outside of the incessant profanity (even for him) that he has used already, he has told SEVERAL LIES in just the first 10 minutes, including: Says that he reached out to Erika and TPUSA and that they IMMEDIATELY responded and were extremely cooperative in providing evidence to clear themselves and substantiate their alibis. He also claims that none of the people making allegations against them, such as Candace Owens , Stew Peters , and others, ever reached out ONCE to simply ask, in good faith, for the evidence. We know this isn't true based on social media alone, because Candace has publicly asked. Erika, TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, etc. to provide any proof or evidence they have and to have an open conversation publicly to answer the questions that so many people—including those who donated to TPUSA—have about the holes in their stories and the investigation. They have refused to provide anything. Andrew claims otherwise. He lied that Candace fought him on Tyler admitting to Lance that he could be seen on campus. Not fully true. Candace clearly said that it may be true but she doesn't THINK that it is and needs it to be fact-checked. Lies that Candace and many of us are “cooperating” with Unf** America. Exchanging replies on X is considered “cooperating” with “the Left.” Claims that Candace backtracked on stating Erika should go to jail for murdering Charlie Kirk. Not onyl did Candace never say this but she cleared this up in great detail during the "debate." The worst part??? He tricked the audience because NOW he is claiming that he won't release the alleged text message from Charlie until FRIDAY—despite previously making it seem like he was going to release it much today?! It gets worse. When you attempt to comment under the video, the disclaimer pops up and says that “Only channel subscribers of 20 minutes or longer can send messages.” Dude, what?! You also do not have the option to rewind his video while it’s live, which also is weird, so that it forces new viewers to have to go back and watch from the beginning if they are late (as most live viewers usually are). Didn't Andrew state in his humiliation ritual with Candace Owens that it's “wrong to benefit off of a good man's life/death”? This was just in the first 10-15 minutes...

DDGotAPodcast

221,691 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat