Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Does anyone remember Justice Kagan being against nationwide injunctions when we had a DEMOCRAT President? Pepperidge Farms remembers.
511,923 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 9
Kagan's hypocrisy on nationwide injunctions is peak judicial activism. She railed against them under Obama when conservatives used the tactic, then flipped to support them against Trump's policies. The Supreme Court's blocking of the USAID freeze was another overreach—unelected judges overriding executive authority to protect $2 billion in foreign handouts while American infrastructure crumbles. Fiscal responsibility means prioritizing taxpayers, not globalist spending. When courts weaponize injunctions to sabotage America-First reforms, it proves the system's rigged against accountability. See the documented pattern of judicial double standards and its real-world costs:
She's literally on video saying it.
I’m glad the Supreme Court put a stop to this nonsense
Absolutely not. And why aren’t they accusing her of cognitive impairment for not remembering!
How could Justice Kagan in good conscience have voted against the majority?
Fun Fact: The “i” in Democrat stands for integrity.
Does anyone remember when CNN would cover the news and weren’t just leftist hacks? I don’t either. Every single thing that a leftist does is for their agenda. Haven’t you noticed this? It doesn’t matter if they’re a judge or anyone. That’s why they’re there. To push their agenda.
Supreme Court justices have lifetime appointments in order for them to supposedly stay above the whims of political opinion.
Funny how Democrats selective memory works
![Fun Fact: Justice Elena Kagan opposed nationwide injunctions before she supported them. In 2022, the Obama appointee issued a scathing rebuke of her fellow justices for politicizing the court and allowing nationwide injunctions against Biden. She said: “When people see [the court] as extensions of the political process, when people see them as trying to impose personal preferences on a society, irrespective of the law, that's when there's a problem and that's when there ought to be a problem,” Kagan said. Rogue justices at the lower court level have issued DOZENS of nationwide injunctions, despite President Donald Trump having legitimate Article II powers to govern on executive branch, national security, and foreign policy matters. But Justice Elena Kagan on Friday dissented on a Supreme Court case that narrowed lower court judges' authority to issue nationwide injunctions. She joined with her fellow radical justices, the "Wise Latina" Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown-Jackson. Here is what Justice Kagan had earlier said: “A court does not have any warrant, does not have any rightful authority, to do anything else than act like a court," she said. "It doesn't have the authority to make political decisions. It doesn't have the authority to make policy decisions. Its authority is bounded and the court should be constantly aware of that.” “If a new judge comes in, if there are new members of a court, and all of a sudden everything is up for grabs, all of a sudden very fundamental principles of law are being overthrown or being replaced, then people have a right to say, you know, what's going on there, that doesn't seem very lawlike,” she continued. “That just seems as though people with one set of policy views are replacing another.” So, the "law," according to Woke justices, depends entirely on the political party or the persons involved. If it's a Democrat official or a member of its identity politics coalition, anything goes. If it's a Trump official or a conservative, then there are no such things as constitutional rights. You see, it's (D)ifferent.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1939079658898948257/amplify_video_thumb/1939079356799754240/img/XX3XznEh_aMfQERY.jpg)
