Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Does archaeology actually support the biblical Exodus?

115,125 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля cmg1973
cmg19731 месяц назад

I've done a lot of research into that and I'm going to have to say yes. It's all about timing.

Фото профиля M M
M M1 месяц назад

⬇️😊

Фото профиля Stellar Fox
Stellar Fox1 месяц назад

There is no evidence though archeologically or in the Egyptian records that Moses existed, and there's no evidence of his name either, and the name itself is most likely made up. The argument of silence also doesn't work, when the scream of his footprint was that loud.

Фото профиля KyleH
KyleH1 месяц назад

Working backwards, who would be the Pharaoh of Joseph?

Фото профиля ByronCAN76
ByronCAN761 месяц назад

Yes

Фото профиля Carlson Tucker
Carlson Tucker1 месяц назад

No

Фото профиля Clark
Clark1 месяц назад

There is literally more archaeological evidence for the first book of Nephi. Then there is for the entire Exodus narrative. And yet the Book of Mormon is proof that the Exodus narrative actually occurred because the gold plates are real and the testimony of the three and eight witnesses given in dozens and dozens of newspapers over our period of 50 years prove it. As does the whisperings of the Holy Spirit

Похожие видео