Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Does breast examination differ depending on breast type? We'll show you, with data from over 1000 patients of different races and breast sizes, whether there really is a difference or not. Visit for more information.

Dr. Gustavo Quirós Licona

16,286 subscribers

141,237 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

1 Comments

Rob Marr3 months ago

this dude is a legend, forcing women to orgasm in the stirrups. LOVE watchin' that sh*t!

Related Videos

I am officially launching a campaign today, for more awareness of breast cancer in people under 50. #DoYourBreast Do Your Breast is calling for better education and support, earlier screening, and a heightened understanding of breast cancer in young people who present with symptoms or concerns. 🩷Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women under 50 in the UK. 🩷1 in 7 women in the UK will develop breast cancer in their lifetime. The consequences can be devastating. Let’s work together on this, so that you - or your loved ones- don’t become another statistic. Please follow Do Your Breast and contact us for information on how you can get involved. #doyourbreastuk #doyourbreastforcancer

I am officially launching a campaign today, for more awareness of breast cancer in people under 50. #DoYourBreast Do Your Breast is calling for better education and support, earlier screening, and a heightened understanding of breast cancer in young people who present with symptoms or concerns. 🩷Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women under 50 in the UK. 🩷1 in 7 women in the UK will develop breast cancer in their lifetime. The consequences can be devastating. Let’s work together on this, so that you - or your loved ones- don’t become another statistic. Please follow Do Your Breast and contact us for information on how you can get involved. #doyourbreastuk #doyourbreastforcancer

heatherdewar

76,598 views • 1 year ago

Follow along with breast oncologist & ASCO member Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO as she takes you through a #DayInTheLife, juggling cancer research, lectures & collaborations, family time, and more! On other days, her time is spent in clinic caring for patients with breast cancer.

Follow along with breast oncologist & ASCO member Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO as she takes you through a #DayInTheLife, juggling cancer research, lectures & collaborations, family time, and more! On other days, her time is spent in clinic caring for patients with breast cancer.

ASCO

50,942 views • 2 years ago

The truth about breast-feeding and breast cancer Is it true that 1 in 20 breast cancers could be prevented by breast feeding? This was a statement lifted from the Lancet Breast Cancer Commission Report published yesterday - but it’s a global estimate that assumes EVERY woman in EVERY country has an average of 6 children and breastfeeds them for 1-2 years. The facts - breastfeeding one child for 12 months reduces your lifetime risk of breast cancer by 4% That’s a drop from 17% to 16.4% - so the actual impact is small. The Report wants to increase breast-feeding education and support globally as en masse this will reduce the numbers of breast cancer - but you don’t need to feel guilty if you didn’t breastfeed for that long or didn’t have children If you want to find out your own individual risk of breast cancer, check out the iPrevent tool - Thanks to Wanda (Wanyuan) Cui The Lancet Breast Cancer Now

The truth about breast-feeding and breast cancer Is it true that 1 in 20 breast cancers could be prevented by breast feeding? This was a statement lifted from the Lancet Breast Cancer Commission Report published yesterday - but it’s a global estimate that assumes EVERY woman in EVERY country has an average of 6 children and breastfeeds them for 1-2 years. The facts - breastfeeding one child for 12 months reduces your lifetime risk of breast cancer by 4% That’s a drop from 17% to 16.4% - so the actual impact is small. The Report wants to increase breast-feeding education and support globally as en masse this will reduce the numbers of breast cancer - but you don’t need to feel guilty if you didn’t breastfeed for that long or didn’t have children If you want to find out your own individual risk of breast cancer, check out the iPrevent tool - Thanks to Wanda (Wanyuan) Cui The Lancet Breast Cancer Now

Dr Liz O'Riordan

45,182 views • 2 years ago

This needs immediate attention American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients “There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction. So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction." That all changes “The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing. They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients” The bill limits coverage to those with a formal breast cancer diagnosis (excluding high-risk preventive cases like BRCA1/2 mutations) and tying reimbursements to outdated CPT codes instead of modern ones (like S codes for muscle-sparing reconstructions).

This needs immediate attention American Surgeon Dr Elizabeth Potter blowing the whistle on a new bill Congress just put out The new bill takes away insurance companies liability to have to pay for breast cancer reconstructive surgery on all high risk prevention patients “There is a bill that has been introduced in Congress that, on the outside, looks like it might be a really good thing for the patients that I care for, for patients affected by breast cancer. But on the inside, there's some real problems with it, and I need your help in raising awareness about that. So when I see a patient who has breast cancer or a risk of breast cancer, there's one thing that I always say to them, and it's so important. It's that the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 guarantees that if their insurance company covers their mastectomy, they have to cover their reconstruction. So as you can imagine, when women hear that, they're so relieved, right? They're like, "Okay, I have to lose my breast, but I'm gonna be able to have reconstruction." That all changes “The number one thing is that previously in the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act, coverage for all breast reconstruction really hinged on one thing, and that was if your insurance covers your mastectomy, they have to cover your reconstruction. When I read this new bill, I looked for that, and what I saw was that they had changed that fundamental thing. They changed that to say now reconstruction hinges on a diagnosis of breast cancer. That may sound similar, but that means that all of our patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2, all of our patients with other high risk for breast cancer, they would not have coverage for breast reconstruction under this new act, and there's no other thing that's providing coverage. So this new amendment would remove coverage for breast reconstruction for all of those patients” The bill limits coverage to those with a formal breast cancer diagnosis (excluding high-risk preventive cases like BRCA1/2 mutations) and tying reimbursements to outdated CPT codes instead of modern ones (like S codes for muscle-sparing reconstructions).

Wall Street Apes

77,473 views • 10 months ago

Did you know that alcohol causes 7 types of cancer - including breast and bowel cancer? It’s the volume you drink in a week, not the type or whether you binge or drink daily #breastcancer #alcoholandcancer tickoffbreastcancer BreastCancer Chat WW #BCCWW

Did you know that alcohol causes 7 types of cancer - including breast and bowel cancer? It’s the volume you drink in a week, not the type or whether you binge or drink daily #breastcancer #alcoholandcancer tickoffbreastcancer BreastCancer Chat WW #BCCWW

Dr Liz O'Riordan

35,252 views • 3 years ago

For most women, the benefits of taking body identical HRT far outweigh any risks. Yet many are reluctant to take it and many doctors are also reluctant to prescribe it. This is usually due to a false belief that HRT is too risky and causes breast cancer. I am sharing with you this paper that has recently been published looking at oestrogen-only HRT and breast cancer incidence. The paper is a meta-analysis, which is a type of statistical analysis where researchers review, combine, and analyse multiple studies together. In this paper, researchers have looked at randomised studies involving oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and put them together to see what the results show. The conclusion is clear: women who take oestrogen-only HRT have a LOWER future risk of developing breast cancer. We’ve known for several years that women who take oestrogen have a lower future incidence of breast cancer as well as other cancers and other conditions. This paper is very reassuring, and it’s worth remembering that any risk of breast cancer has been shown using oestrogen with a combination of a synthetic progestogen, not the body-identical type progesterone healthcare professionals usually prescribe.

For most women, the benefits of taking body identical HRT far outweigh any risks. Yet many are reluctant to take it and many doctors are also reluctant to prescribe it. This is usually due to a false belief that HRT is too risky and causes breast cancer. I am sharing with you this paper that has recently been published looking at oestrogen-only HRT and breast cancer incidence. The paper is a meta-analysis, which is a type of statistical analysis where researchers review, combine, and analyse multiple studies together. In this paper, researchers have looked at randomised studies involving oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and put them together to see what the results show. The conclusion is clear: women who take oestrogen-only HRT have a LOWER future risk of developing breast cancer. We’ve known for several years that women who take oestrogen have a lower future incidence of breast cancer as well as other cancers and other conditions. This paper is very reassuring, and it’s worth remembering that any risk of breast cancer has been shown using oestrogen with a combination of a synthetic progestogen, not the body-identical type progesterone healthcare professionals usually prescribe.

Dr Louise Newson

23,818 views • 2 years ago

You’ve waited long enough! Pink Mercy is back in #Overwatch2 June 25 and she’s not alone this time 🤩 Learn more about Mercy for a Cause, the new Rose Gold Mercy Bundle, and how you can support breast cancer research with The Breast Cancer Research Foundation 💖 👉

You’ve waited long enough! Pink Mercy is back in #Overwatch2 June 25 and she’s not alone this time 🤩 Learn more about Mercy for a Cause, the new Rose Gold Mercy Bundle, and how you can support breast cancer research with The Breast Cancer Research Foundation 💖 👉

Overwatch

351,941 views • 2 years ago

A new documentary by FactNotFictionFilms spotlighting a pivotal campaign to secure funding for lobular breast cancer research is set to premiere at Raindance Film Festival this week. Titled ‘Our Journey with Lobular Breast Cancer’, the film tells the story of the LobularMoonShotProject Project, launched in 2023 by Dr. Susan Michaelis. The campaign has gained support from 365 Members of Parliament, forming a majority in the House of Commons, who are seeking to back a five-year, £20 million research programme into invasive lobular breast cancer, the second most common type of breast cancer in the UK. Learn more about the film:

A new documentary by FactNotFictionFilms spotlighting a pivotal campaign to secure funding for lobular breast cancer research is set to premiere at Raindance Film Festival this week. Titled ‘Our Journey with Lobular Breast Cancer’, the film tells the story of the LobularMoonShotProject Project, launched in 2023 by Dr. Susan Michaelis. The campaign has gained support from 365 Members of Parliament, forming a majority in the House of Commons, who are seeking to back a five-year, £20 million research programme into invasive lobular breast cancer, the second most common type of breast cancer in the UK. Learn more about the film:

Film Industry Network

20,359 views • 1 year ago

It’s been more than 20 years since media headlines about the Women’s Health Initiative study incorrectly linked HRT to an increased risk of breast cancer, but even today many women still avoid HRT because of perceived breast cancer fears. This misinformation is really damaging to women’s health, so on my podcast this week I invited Dr Avrum Bluming to join me. Avrum is a leading US oncologist and has spent 25 years studying the benefits and risks of HRT in breast cancer survivors. As you’ll hear in the episode, Avrum tells me about more recent studies that have shown that oestrogen alone decreases the risk of breast cancer development by 23% and the risk of death from breast cancer by 40%. Yet many people still do not realise this. It is so important that everyone knows the real story about the WHI study and the misreporting of the data so I really would recommend listening to the full episode:

It’s been more than 20 years since media headlines about the Women’s Health Initiative study incorrectly linked HRT to an increased risk of breast cancer, but even today many women still avoid HRT because of perceived breast cancer fears. This misinformation is really damaging to women’s health, so on my podcast this week I invited Dr Avrum Bluming to join me. Avrum is a leading US oncologist and has spent 25 years studying the benefits and risks of HRT in breast cancer survivors. As you’ll hear in the episode, Avrum tells me about more recent studies that have shown that oestrogen alone decreases the risk of breast cancer development by 23% and the risk of death from breast cancer by 40%. Yet many people still do not realise this. It is so important that everyone knows the real story about the WHI study and the misreporting of the data so I really would recommend listening to the full episode:

Dr Louise Newson

40,567 views • 2 years ago

Sharon Stone gets emotional talking about the moment her marriage ended after her husband got FURIOUS over her decision to have a double mastectomy and breast removal due to a breast tumor instead of focusing on her health 😳💔👀 “He was furious. And the doctor said to him, ‘If I had more patients like her, we’d have more women alive today. You need to sit down.I said, ‘I make the decisions, not you.’ That was the end of the marriage.”

Sharon Stone gets emotional talking about the moment her marriage ended after her husband got FURIOUS over her decision to have a double mastectomy and breast removal due to a breast tumor instead of focusing on her health 😳💔👀 “He was furious. And the doctor said to him, ‘If I had more patients like her, we’d have more women alive today. You need to sit down.I said, ‘I make the decisions, not you.’ That was the end of the marriage.”

Killa 🌺

6,670,892 views • 3 months ago

At Screening Saves Lives, JoAnn Pushkin, Executive Director of DenseBreast-Info.org, emphasized the need for a more standardized breast cancer screening approach - starting with risk conversations at age 25, better provider guidance to identify high-risk patients, and insurance coverage that doesn’t leave women unable to afford essential supplemental imaging. Presented by Alliance for Breast Cancer Policy Learn more: #TheHillHealth #BreastCancerAwareness

At Screening Saves Lives, JoAnn Pushkin, Executive Director of DenseBreast-Info.org, emphasized the need for a more standardized breast cancer screening approach - starting with risk conversations at age 25, better provider guidance to identify high-risk patients, and insurance coverage that doesn’t leave women unable to afford essential supplemental imaging. Presented by Alliance for Breast Cancer Policy Learn more: #TheHillHealth #BreastCancerAwareness

The Hill Events

16,607 views • 10 months ago

Actress Amanda Peete (54) was diagnosed with stage 2 hormone-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer last fall — caught only because she pushed for answers after vague symptoms and dense breast tissue made it harder to detect. Key takeaways from her story + breast surgeon Dr. Elisa Port: - Dense breasts (nearly 50% of women over 40) make mammograms less effective (can miss up to 40% of cancers). - Persistent symptoms (even with “normal” tests) deserve extra imaging — an outside MRI or ultrasound can make the difference. - Most breast cancers today are highly treatable; lumpectomy + radiation often suffices, with <5% local recurrence risk and ~91% overall survival. Peete credits early detection, faith, and her mission to help others. She’s now cancer-free post-treatment and using her platform to encourage women to advocate for themselves. Dense breasts or persistent “something’s not right” symptoms? Have you (or someone close) ever had to push for more testing beyond standard mammograms? Your stories 👇

Actress Amanda Peete (54) was diagnosed with stage 2 hormone-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer last fall — caught only because she pushed for answers after vague symptoms and dense breast tissue made it harder to detect. Key takeaways from her story + breast surgeon Dr. Elisa Port: - Dense breasts (nearly 50% of women over 40) make mammograms less effective (can miss up to 40% of cancers). - Persistent symptoms (even with “normal” tests) deserve extra imaging — an outside MRI or ultrasound can make the difference. - Most breast cancers today are highly treatable; lumpectomy + radiation often suffices, with <5% local recurrence risk and ~91% overall survival. Peete credits early detection, faith, and her mission to help others. She’s now cancer-free post-treatment and using her platform to encourage women to advocate for themselves. Dense breasts or persistent “something’s not right” symptoms? Have you (or someone close) ever had to push for more testing beyond standard mammograms? Your stories 👇

Camus

582,802 views • 6 months ago

Lobular Cancer is the 2nd most common type of breast cancer, but currently has no specific treatment. After meeting my constituent Katie over the summer and learning more about this type of cancer, I have been working with Dr Susan Michaelis at the Lobular Moonshot Project to campaign for funding to create a dedicated research stream for Lobular Cancer. Today, during PMQs, I asked the Prime Minister if he would meet me and Susan to discuss how the Government can help us save more lives from breast cancer.

Lobular Cancer is the 2nd most common type of breast cancer, but currently has no specific treatment. After meeting my constituent Katie over the summer and learning more about this type of cancer, I have been working with Dr Susan Michaelis at the Lobular Moonshot Project to campaign for funding to create a dedicated research stream for Lobular Cancer. Today, during PMQs, I asked the Prime Minister if he would meet me and Susan to discuss how the Government can help us save more lives from breast cancer.

Dehenna Davison

17,512 views • 2 years ago

After I moved more breast reconstruction surgeries to an outpatient surgery center, the hospital proposed sending my remaining DIEP flap patients to the ICU, despite the fact that these patients had never previously required ICU care. The ICU is one of the most expensive places in a hospital. So I called hospital leadership to explain why I believed this wasn’t in the best interest of patients. I’m sharing that conversation with you. Over the past 13 years, our team has performed thousands of breast reconstruction procedures with a 99.7 % success rate. These patients do not need ICU care. They need specialized nurses who understand breast reconstruction, early mobility, and a pathway that gets them safely home. The documented rationale for the change had nothing to do with patients actually needed more acute care. It had everything to do with declining case volume. We can learn a lot about priorities by observing how people and systems respond to stress. I improved outcomes and lowered the cost of breast reconstruction by moving it to an outpatient center. The system responded by increasing the cost per patient. We should all take note.

After I moved more breast reconstruction surgeries to an outpatient surgery center, the hospital proposed sending my remaining DIEP flap patients to the ICU, despite the fact that these patients had never previously required ICU care. The ICU is one of the most expensive places in a hospital. So I called hospital leadership to explain why I believed this wasn’t in the best interest of patients. I’m sharing that conversation with you. Over the past 13 years, our team has performed thousands of breast reconstruction procedures with a 99.7 % success rate. These patients do not need ICU care. They need specialized nurses who understand breast reconstruction, early mobility, and a pathway that gets them safely home. The documented rationale for the change had nothing to do with patients actually needed more acute care. It had everything to do with declining case volume. We can learn a lot about priorities by observing how people and systems respond to stress. I improved outcomes and lowered the cost of breast reconstruction by moving it to an outpatient center. The system responded by increasing the cost per patient. We should all take note.

Elisabeth Potter MD

55,826 views • 2 months ago

A lovely morning with Marti Pellow singing for cancer patients and staff in Leeds as he raises awareness of checking for breast cancer. Download the charity re-release of Love is All Around Lorraine Lorraine #BreastCancerAwareness

A lovely morning with Marti Pellow singing for cancer patients and staff in Leeds as he raises awareness of checking for breast cancer. Download the charity re-release of Love is All Around Lorraine Lorraine #BreastCancerAwareness

Leeds Teaching Hospitals

36,119 views • 1 year ago

RFK Jr. discusses the importance of breast milk for our children’s health. “Nobody is better at designing baby formula than God and evolution.” “And the nutrients in breast milk are just superior to anything that you can buy on the counter.” “Study after study supports that.” “We want to make sure that mothers who cannot give their babies breast milk for one reason or another, that they have very high quality baby formula that they know does not have contaminants in it.” Secretary Kennedy HHS Isabel Brown

RFK Jr. discusses the importance of breast milk for our children’s health. “Nobody is better at designing baby formula than God and evolution.” “And the nutrients in breast milk are just superior to anything that you can buy on the counter.” “Study after study supports that.” “We want to make sure that mothers who cannot give their babies breast milk for one reason or another, that they have very high quality baby formula that they know does not have contaminants in it.” Secretary Kennedy HHS Isabel Brown

Children’s Health Defense

14,970 views • 8 months ago

Turbo cancer? Official Italian gov’t data from the first-ever population study of 300,000+ shows a 20%+ increased cancer risk after mRNA shots, with up to 70% higher risk for breast cancer and more. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher explains:

Turbo cancer? Official Italian gov’t data from the first-ever population study of 300,000+ shows a 20%+ increased cancer risk after mRNA shots, with up to 70% higher risk for breast cancer and more. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher explains:

Catturd ™

214,732 views • 1 year ago