Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Does Hank Brennan want to win at all costs?
50,359 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
11 Comments

I believe that Brennan's decision not to call rebuttal witnesses is 100% to save himself from being further implicated in his various shenanigans (the cuts in the hoodie, missing x-rays, etc). Is it really worth risking his career when he knows that next week, the Norfolk County gravy train ends and it's back to the real world for him? Yikes. Just take the money (and God willing, the L), move on, and do better.

🇺🇸 One Nation, under Trump, Stronger THAN EVER. Are you Trump Tough? 💪Tough T's Here:

Your grift is over in a few days👏👏

No he wants justice ! The absolute opposite of you lazy ass grifters

There’s no way a juror can look and listen to these ARRCA witnesses and determine she’s guilty. If there’s a reason KR ends up being convicted, it’s due to her own words that prosecution is going to key in on. Why she did interviews is beyond me.

I truly believe Dr. R guy was winning jury over. Hank realized this, causing him to become overly aggressive. Also why he’s not bringing Welcher back, & be the last thing jury is given…either he lied or Welcher re x-rays and that gawd awful video reenactment for 400k.

Yes. Yes he does. Wouldn’t put it past some rigging of the jury either. Don’t trust him. AT ALL

Yes, for some reason

With you, when defense attorneys try to win at all costs it’s fine. Even if THEY ARE LYING, WITNESS INTIMIDATORS. Hank has proven this case beyond any reasonable doubt. Karen Read is guilty. I am so disappointed in you Peter. You used to have more common sense and credibility.

Hank wants to win at all cost, and he knows he had free rein to do/say just about anything he wants. Truly, it makes me sad and disgusted to see see this behavior in our courts of law .

LMAO Jackson and other D lawyers did the exact same thing. When it’s Jackson you say he is doing the right thing.

