Does he REALLY believe this 23 years after 9/11 when proper journalists have demolished the whole official story of 19 Arab hijackers? Does he really? See my mega-book The Trigger. The orchestrators WERE from the Middle East - just not Muslim.

What about the 19 Jewish art students who had unlimited unsupervised access to the 90th and 91st floors for over a year?

In May, the target was Robert Fico. In July, it was Donald Trump. The pattern of these attacks is becoming clearer. Who could be next?

The Trigger is great. The notion of still believing the official story of 9/11 is about as dumb at this point as believing the official story of JFK's assassination. The amount of mental gymnastics necessary to avoid reality here is olympic level.

Muslims with boxcutters who can't fly a Cessna, but are comfortable doing aerobatics in a 757 & other fantasies. 9/11 was the New Pearl Harbor false flag event the 1997 Project for the New American Century needed to blame muslims & start endless war leading to WWIII. Ubi Solitudinem Faciunt Pacem Appellant.

No he doesn’t really believe it. But Tucker, like every other public figure in America, cannot utter the truth for fear of terrible personal consequences .

@TLAVagabond Tucker despises *anyone* who doesn't believe and accept the *boxcutter* myth. That all you need to know to understand who he works for. He's DEFINITELY NOT on the side of the American people, or truth.

Tucker = controlled opposition shill (and this comment proves it). He knows FULL WELL who orchestrated 9/11.

Try Israel!

No, he doesn’t truly believe what he’s saying, but because of who his handlers are, he’s forced to say al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11.

I'm not sure he's blind to the whole 9/11 being a false flag narrative. Tucker is very forthright, but he does, out of politeness with certain guests, frame his questions in a way that will elicit free flowing conversation. I think Sacks is interesting and authentic, but for all his knowledge within his silo, I don't think he's quite yet, outside of his areas of focus, where others are. My sense is Tucker my simply understand that and so avoided phrasing things in a way that might interrupt interview continuity. Analyse what he said it isn't necessarily blind to the telling anomalies surrounding 9/11.

David. He just had Jeffrey Sachs on. Is he a fool too? Or controlled opposition? It would be nice to hear you praise someone for a change.