Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Does science actually have the ability to answer meaning questions? My friend Glen Scrivener of Speak Life uses a great illustration that I relayed to Steven Bartlett on my discussion with him on the Diary of a CEO in regard to that very question: the parable of Betty the... show more

Wes Huff

189,668 subscribers

18,291 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Oxford professor John Lennox in an interview with Jordan Peterson in 2023 explained his view that there is no conflict between science and Christianity: "I never saw the tension between Christianity and science because very early on as a teenager I was introduced to the writings of a scientist who was a Christian who drew my attention to something Alfred North Whitehead wrote, and it was really put in much simpler language by C.S. Lewis when he wrote 'Men became scientific because they expected law in nature, and they expected law in nature because they believed in a Lawgiver.' And so, very early on, and I was fascinated by the idea, that actually modern science is a legacy of the biblical worldview, and therefore, it's no accident that the pioneers—Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Maxwell, and so on—were believers in God. And as you pointed out, it underpins the tradition that lies behind the great universities of the world that the doctrine of Creation was actually the belief, the underlying presupposition, that allowed people to do science. So I've come over my life to the conclusion that science and the biblical worldview sit very comfortably together, but it's science and atheism that do not sit comfortably together."

Oxford professor John Lennox in an interview with Jordan Peterson in 2023 explained his view that there is no conflict between science and Christianity: "I never saw the tension between Christianity and science because very early on as a teenager I was introduced to the writings of a scientist who was a Christian who drew my attention to something Alfred North Whitehead wrote, and it was really put in much simpler language by C.S. Lewis when he wrote 'Men became scientific because they expected law in nature, and they expected law in nature because they believed in a Lawgiver.' And so, very early on, and I was fascinated by the idea, that actually modern science is a legacy of the biblical worldview, and therefore, it's no accident that the pioneers—Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Maxwell, and so on—were believers in God. And as you pointed out, it underpins the tradition that lies behind the great universities of the world that the doctrine of Creation was actually the belief, the underlying presupposition, that allowed people to do science. So I've come over my life to the conclusion that science and the biblical worldview sit very comfortably together, but it's science and atheism that do not sit comfortably together."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

137,411 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The American dream is on the ropes because the American political system has broken down. I talked with Steven Bartlett of The Diary of a CEO about what needs to change in America today.

The American dream is on the ropes because the American political system has broken down. I talked with Steven Bartlett of The Diary of a CEO about what needs to change in America today.

Pete Buttigieg

127,751 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

CLEMENT MANYATHELA I have been banned from Interviewing President Cyril Ramaphosa My sin was to ask him about Phala Phala saga. Those surrounding him told me that I crossed the line. I will never Interview him again. They said to me I almost cost them their jobs. I dont understand what I was supposed to do in my show when all my listeners expected me to ask that burning issue at that time. Ramaphosa didnt seem to have a problem during the interview. He responded to my question. We moved on. Some ministers have taken the same stance because of that question. They dont my breath in the room they are present in

CLEMENT MANYATHELA I have been banned from Interviewing President Cyril Ramaphosa My sin was to ask him about Phala Phala saga. Those surrounding him told me that I crossed the line. I will never Interview him again. They said to me I almost cost them their jobs. I dont understand what I was supposed to do in my show when all my listeners expected me to ask that burning issue at that time. Ramaphosa didnt seem to have a problem during the interview. He responded to my question. We moved on. Some ministers have taken the same stance because of that question. They dont my breath in the room they are present in

Constitution First 🇿🇦

246,046 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Does this look like a nation waiting for someone like Donald Trump to “liberate” it? One of the main reasons the United States failed in its war on Iran was because trump and his administration believed the Iranian people would rise up against their own state. They expected internal unrest. They expected the system to collapse from within. Well, I guess they have their answer now. The images coming out of Iran speak for themselves.

Does this look like a nation waiting for someone like Donald Trump to “liberate” it? One of the main reasons the United States failed in its war on Iran was because trump and his administration believed the Iranian people would rise up against their own state. They expected internal unrest. They expected the system to collapse from within. Well, I guess they have their answer now. The images coming out of Iran speak for themselves.

Ibrahim Majed

22,957 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Eric Trump: "They made the biggest mistake of their life. They tried to do it to my father in Butler, they tried to do it to him on a golf course. Now they did it to Charlie. And you have the law of unintended consequences."

Eric Trump: "They made the biggest mistake of their life. They tried to do it to my father in Butler, they tried to do it to him on a golf course. Now they did it to Charlie. And you have the law of unintended consequences."

Aaron Rupar

65,074 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

116,176 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Today I spoke in the debate on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. I remain of the view that the status quo is unacceptable, and I have listened to constituents who have told me they want to see a change in the law.

Today I spoke in the debate on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. I remain of the view that the status quo is unacceptable, and I have listened to constituents who have told me they want to see a change in the law.

Rachel Taylor MP

12,049 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Clinton: The best exchange that I had came at the very end, when contrary to every other deposition they have taken, no Republican member asked any question about Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell to anyone else they had deposed. In fact, the Republican members didn't even show up for the deposition of Les Wexner. And when I said that, I had to point out that the only questions that any Republican member asked of any of the people they deposed was former AG Barr, when Chairman Comer asked him about the allegations in his view about Russia's involvement in my election in 2016. So at the very end of this hearing, after I made that point I want to commend Chairman Comer for raising a series of significant questions that I responded to about the nature of the investigation, in the areas that I thought should be explored.

Clinton: The best exchange that I had came at the very end, when contrary to every other deposition they have taken, no Republican member asked any question about Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell to anyone else they had deposed. In fact, the Republican members didn't even show up for the deposition of Les Wexner. And when I said that, I had to point out that the only questions that any Republican member asked of any of the people they deposed was former AG Barr, when Chairman Comer asked him about the allegations in his view about Russia's involvement in my election in 2016. So at the very end of this hearing, after I made that point I want to commend Chairman Comer for raising a series of significant questions that I responded to about the nature of the investigation, in the areas that I thought should be explored.

Acyn

834,496 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

NBC’s Tom Winters with an accurate reaction from the 4pm hour to the deadly ICE-involved shooting: “I think from a law enforcement perspective, what you've heard law enforcement say is that they don't — they don't like the way that this shooting looks. And in speaking with people from law enforcement, from that part of the country, they use a phrase that is sometimes heard in law enforcement circles lawful but awful. They don't like the look of it, but from a legal perspective, it might be okay. To get specific to your question — okay, legally, I should say — to get specific to your question, this case is going to be investigated by the FBI first and foremost, because it involves a shooting — shooting by a federal law enforcement officer.”

NBC’s Tom Winters with an accurate reaction from the 4pm hour to the deadly ICE-involved shooting: “I think from a law enforcement perspective, what you've heard law enforcement say is that they don't — they don't like the way that this shooting looks. And in speaking with people from law enforcement, from that part of the country, they use a phrase that is sometimes heard in law enforcement circles lawful but awful. They don't like the look of it, but from a legal perspective, it might be okay. To get specific to your question — okay, legally, I should say — to get specific to your question, this case is going to be investigated by the FBI first and foremost, because it involves a shooting — shooting by a federal law enforcement officer.”

Curtis Houck

89,472 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"They pick and choose who they enforce the law on." They wouldn't do that. It's the same shit in my neck of the woods.

"They pick and choose who they enforce the law on." They wouldn't do that. It's the same shit in my neck of the woods.

All4Freedom🇺🇲🐸🍿

41,595 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Why 90% of the lands in the Arab/Islam world are empty, but Muslims focusing on destroying and conquering other peoples lands? Because Muslims believe that all the lands in the world belongs to Allah and needs to rule by the law of Allah, so they have a divine mission to implement sharia law on every country on earth

Why 90% of the lands in the Arab/Islam world are empty, but Muslims focusing on destroying and conquering other peoples lands? Because Muslims believe that all the lands in the world belongs to Allah and needs to rule by the law of Allah, so they have a divine mission to implement sharia law on every country on earth

Bob

32,876 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kaine: The message that I wanted to deliver here because the Iranians monitor U.S. Media pretty darn carefully, is if this second pilot is rescued, treat him or her in accord with international humanitarian law about prisoners. Many are making the case that the US actions to strike downed survivors of attacks in the caribbean or pacific or the striking of civilian infrastructure in Iran are violations of international law. If Iran shows that it will follow international humanitarian law in the treatment of this pilot, should they should they seize him, that would be a very strong statement that we ought to we ought to always follow rules, especially with respect to survivors of attacks like this.

Kaine: The message that I wanted to deliver here because the Iranians monitor U.S. Media pretty darn carefully, is if this second pilot is rescued, treat him or her in accord with international humanitarian law about prisoners. Many are making the case that the US actions to strike downed survivors of attacks in the caribbean or pacific or the striking of civilian infrastructure in Iran are violations of international law. If Iran shows that it will follow international humanitarian law in the treatment of this pilot, should they should they seize him, that would be a very strong statement that we ought to we ought to always follow rules, especially with respect to survivors of attacks like this.

Acyn

617,560 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Rep. Khanna: The law clearly required all unclassified information being released today. They obviously have not complied with that law. They have known about this for months, they should have been preparing that. At the very least, what we need is for the Attorney General to have a press conference and say, 'here is the timeline of what we're going to release to be in full compliance of the law.'

Rep. Khanna: The law clearly required all unclassified information being released today. They obviously have not complied with that law. They have known about this for months, they should have been preparing that. At the very least, what we need is for the Attorney General to have a press conference and say, 'here is the timeline of what we're going to release to be in full compliance of the law.'

FactPost

22,138 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

WATCH: Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin RIPS AG-elect Jay Jones: "I am incredibly concerned about the Attorney General elect's to do the job based on the text that he sent. They were abhorrent, and I think that they, once again, reiterate that you can't come into this job, if you are espousing death on a political enemy, the death of law enforcement. And I believe, just as I've always believed that that disqualifies him for the job. The next administration's going to have to figure out how to deal with that because they have law enforcement, that they're going to need to make sure, feel good about doing the job. They're going to have to make sure that parents with children feel safe. And that's going to be a challenge going forward. My position has not changed, that there is absolutely no excuse for what he wrote. None. And we live in a society today that I think has lost its way some, at least some folks have, on their willingness to almost accept violence and political violence as a solution."

WATCH: Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin RIPS AG-elect Jay Jones: "I am incredibly concerned about the Attorney General elect's to do the job based on the text that he sent. They were abhorrent, and I think that they, once again, reiterate that you can't come into this job, if you are espousing death on a political enemy, the death of law enforcement. And I believe, just as I've always believed that that disqualifies him for the job. The next administration's going to have to figure out how to deal with that because they have law enforcement, that they're going to need to make sure, feel good about doing the job. They're going to have to make sure that parents with children feel safe. And that's going to be a challenge going forward. My position has not changed, that there is absolutely no excuse for what he wrote. None. And we live in a society today that I think has lost its way some, at least some folks have, on their willingness to almost accept violence and political violence as a solution."

Steve Guest

263,321 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Vice President JD Vance gets CONFRONTED by Diary of a CEO host Steven Bartlett over his old 2016 comments about Donald Trump, including comparing him to “America’s Hitler” and describing him as “cultural heroin” 😳👀 Vance admits he genuinely believed those things at the time and expected Trump to be a failed president, but says getting to know him completely changed his opinion. “I wrote that, I believed it when I wrote it and reading now I’m almost embarrassed that I wrote it because it was so obviously absurd.”

Vice President JD Vance gets CONFRONTED by Diary of a CEO host Steven Bartlett over his old 2016 comments about Donald Trump, including comparing him to “America’s Hitler” and describing him as “cultural heroin” 😳👀 Vance admits he genuinely believed those things at the time and expected Trump to be a failed president, but says getting to know him completely changed his opinion. “I wrote that, I believed it when I wrote it and reading now I’m almost embarrassed that I wrote it because it was so obviously absurd.”

Killa 🌺

31,167 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten