正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Does the entire right-wing influencer class need to go? Was Epstein chopping off people's feet with a scimitar? Can the right survive without important thought leader Sarah Stock? Tune in to the latest episode of Restoring Order to find out. (0:11) Americans still trust the GOP over Dems on...

restoreorderusa's profile picture

Patrick Casey

84,745 subscribers

47,430 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治健康养生
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I discuss recent SCOTUS developments, laugh at Scott Wiener, and consider the possibility that Trump has supernatural powers. (1:11) White-pill: SCOTUS ends TPS (15:44) The qualitative dimension to political commentary (22:18) Why did conservative influencers spin the TPS decision as a loss? (27:46) Is freaking out at the admin the right move even if you've got the facts wrong? (32:55) SCOTUS probably won't deliver on birthright citizenship (recorded last night) In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I react to a few clips of Scott Wiener being harassed in public for being insufficiently anti-Zionist. Turns out supporting gay sex offenders isn't enough to remain in the left's good graces these days. I then review a clip of Lucas Gage and Jeremy Boreing bonding over the alleged non-existence of white people. Toward the end of the show, I take a look at some of Tucker's recent comments on Trump. Is our president a wizard with eldritch powers? Tune in to find out.
35:16

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I discuss recent SCOTUS developments, laugh at Scott Wiener, and consider the possibility that Trump has supernatural powers. (1:11) White-pill: SCOTUS ends TPS (15:44) The qualitative dimension to political commentary (22:18) Why did conservative influencers spin the TPS decision as a loss? (27:46) Is freaking out at the admin the right move even if you've got the facts wrong? (32:55) SCOTUS probably won't deliver on birthright citizenship (recorded last night) In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I react to a few clips of Scott Wiener being harassed in public for being insufficiently anti-Zionist. Turns out supporting gay sex offenders isn't enough to remain in the left's good graces these days. I then review a clip of Lucas Gage and Jeremy Boreing bonding over the alleged non-existence of white people. Toward the end of the show, I take a look at some of Tucker's recent comments on Trump. Is our president a wizard with eldritch powers? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

24,131 次观看 • 1 个月前

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I cover Trump's legal immigration policies, the new DHS secretary, the end of the Iran war, and Trump's spat with Pope Leo. (1:10) CATO's new report on Trump's immigration policies (9:45) Legal entries by asylum seekers are down 99.9% (12:08) Trump drastically reduced student visas (16:09) Retard right personalities know their audiences are stupid (21:33) Will DHS Secretary Mullin deliver? (26:38) Why incentivizing self-deportation is critical In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I switch gears to talk about the latest with Iran. I argue that, even if this ceasefire doesn't hold, it's evidence that Trump is averse to starting another "forever war." I then consider the U.S. blockade on Iran and outline why I'm cautiously optimistic. Toward the end of the show, I examine Trump's ongoing spat with Pope Leo. Is the Pope more right-wing than every Republican, as some have claimed? Or is he really just a liberal at heart? Tune in to find out.
30:07

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I cover Trump's legal immigration policies, the new DHS secretary, the end of the Iran war, and Trump's spat with Pope Leo. (1:10) CATO's new report on Trump's immigration policies (9:45) Legal entries by asylum seekers are down 99.9% (12:08) Trump drastically reduced student visas (16:09) Retard right personalities know their audiences are stupid (21:33) Will DHS Secretary Mullin deliver? (26:38) Why incentivizing self-deportation is critical In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I switch gears to talk about the latest with Iran. I argue that, even if this ceasefire doesn't hold, it's evidence that Trump is averse to starting another "forever war." I then consider the U.S. blockade on Iran and outline why I'm cautiously optimistic. Toward the end of the show, I examine Trump's ongoing spat with Pope Leo. Is the Pope more right-wing than every Republican, as some have claimed? Or is he really just a liberal at heart? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

41,167 次观看 • 4 个月前

Was President Trump wrong to castigate the podcasters? I explore the division on the right on the latest episode of Restoring Order. (0:30) The ongoing anti-Trump demoralization op (2:03) Why Trump's refugee policies are excellent (9:31) Do we live in ziohell, as some claim? (13:57) A quick rundown on Trump's immigration wins so far (17:30) Trump excoriates the podcasters (19:31) Is Brigitte Macron actually more attractive than Candace? (22:55) Tucker implies Trump is the anti-Christ (30:46) Is it cool to wear a hat that says "low IQ"? In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I read Tucker's response to Trump. I argue that conspiracy theories about Trump being blackmailed by Israel cause people to lose sight of the real dynamics at play. I then take a look at a few polls that suggest that Tucker is becoming less popular among Republicans. What does that mean, given that his audience is bigger than ever? Later, I examine what Candace, Megyn, and Alex were saying about Trump before he admonished them. Toward the end of the show, I consider JD Vance's future. He wants these big names to support his 2028 run, but he needs to be able to say Trump 47 was a success. How should Vance navigate this schism? Tune in to find out.
32:02

Was President Trump wrong to castigate the podcasters? I explore the division on the right on the latest episode of Restoring Order. (0:30) The ongoing anti-Trump demoralization op (2:03) Why Trump's refugee policies are excellent (9:31) Do we live in ziohell, as some claim? (13:57) A quick rundown on Trump's immigration wins so far (17:30) Trump excoriates the podcasters (19:31) Is Brigitte Macron actually more attractive than Candace? (22:55) Tucker implies Trump is the anti-Christ (30:46) Is it cool to wear a hat that says "low IQ"? In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I read Tucker's response to Trump. I argue that conspiracy theories about Trump being blackmailed by Israel cause people to lose sight of the real dynamics at play. I then take a look at a few polls that suggest that Tucker is becoming less popular among Republicans. What does that mean, given that his audience is bigger than ever? Later, I examine what Candace, Megyn, and Alex were saying about Trump before he admonished them. Toward the end of the show, I consider JD Vance's future. He wants these big names to support his 2028 run, but he needs to be able to say Trump 47 was a success. How should Vance navigate this schism? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

51,137 次观看 • 4 个月前

Border Patrol just shot an anti-ICE agitator in Minneapolis. On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I take a look at what happened. (0:27) Breaking news: I have a new mic (1:31) Paid subscribers enjoy far better life outcomes, according to science (4:31) Border Patrol ices a left-wing agitator (9:08) Similarities between anti-ICE stuff and BLM (14:45) Actual instances of law enforcement misconduct exist but they are rare and do not invalidate the need for law enforcement (19:00) Dr. Pepper Zero Sugar is better than Diet Coke (22:16) Tim Walz's response to the shooting In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I examine some footage of the unrest that broke out in Minneapolis following the shooting. I then explain why it's important for both the administration and right-wing media to continue highlighting the heinous illegal scumbags anti-ICE activists are protecting. Moving along, I discuss the 5-year-old child hoax. I note that a few conservative commentators fell for it. I compare this to conservatives' response to the Covington Catholic incident, and explain why so many on the right keep failing these basic tests. Toward the end of the show, I discuss someone who was recently arrested for threatening ICE officers online. The individual in question, a Hispanic zoomer, is anti-MAGA and anti-ICE, yet pro-Hitler and anti-Semitic. I recount the multiyear influencer operation design to convince people that thinking in terms of right vs left was "Jewish." Why are people committed to such idiotic takes? Tune in to find out.
25:28

Border Patrol just shot an anti-ICE agitator in Minneapolis. On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I take a look at what happened. (0:27) Breaking news: I have a new mic (1:31) Paid subscribers enjoy far better life outcomes, according to science (4:31) Border Patrol ices a left-wing agitator (9:08) Similarities between anti-ICE stuff and BLM (14:45) Actual instances of law enforcement misconduct exist but they are rare and do not invalidate the need for law enforcement (19:00) Dr. Pepper Zero Sugar is better than Diet Coke (22:16) Tim Walz's response to the shooting In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I examine some footage of the unrest that broke out in Minneapolis following the shooting. I then explain why it's important for both the administration and right-wing media to continue highlighting the heinous illegal scumbags anti-ICE activists are protecting. Moving along, I discuss the 5-year-old child hoax. I note that a few conservative commentators fell for it. I compare this to conservatives' response to the Covington Catholic incident, and explain why so many on the right keep failing these basic tests. Toward the end of the show, I discuss someone who was recently arrested for threatening ICE officers online. The individual in question, a Hispanic zoomer, is anti-MAGA and anti-ICE, yet pro-Hitler and anti-Semitic. I recount the multiyear influencer operation design to convince people that thinking in terms of right vs left was "Jewish." Why are people committed to such idiotic takes? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

71,495 次观看 • 6 个月前

Wow. Elon Musk's tweet about Trump being in the Epstein Files was posted while Joe Rogan was interviewing Kash Patel. Patel was clearly caught off guard. Rogan: Jesus Christ. Patel: I'm not participating in any of that conversation. Rogan: Jesus Christ, that’s a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein Files? Patel: I don't know how he would, but I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing. That's way out of my lane...I know my lane—and that ain’t it.
1:07

Wow. Elon Musk's tweet about Trump being in the Epstein Files was posted while Joe Rogan was interviewing Kash Patel. Patel was clearly caught off guard. Rogan: Jesus Christ. Patel: I'm not participating in any of that conversation. Rogan: Jesus Christ, that’s a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein Files? Patel: I don't know how he would, but I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing. That's way out of my lane...I know my lane—and that ain’t it.

MeidasTouch

5,035,015 次观看 • 1 年前

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I tackle the most pressing issues of our time: redistricting, Somali fraud, and whether a "former" crossdressing communist should be a right-wing thought leader. (1:50) Three things the Trump administration has done well (15:55) Three things the Trump administration could have done better (29:45) Did the GOP lose the redistricting battle? (39:57) Somali fraud in Minnesota In the second half of the show (link in reply), I continue discussing the Somali daycare scandal. What, if anything, will the Trump administration do? With the serious stuff out of the way, I move on to a less serious but more entertaining topic: the saga of “Vrillium,” a content creator in the retard right whose past as a bisexual crossdressing communist was recently exposed. I talk about this new crop of “based” influencers and explain why they are a net negative for the right. This leads to a discussion of Sneako and Clavicular, both of whom recently called JD Vance “subhuman.” I explain why Clavicular’s shtick falls flat for me—and why his attempts at political commentary can be easily dismissed. As for Sneako…is a half-Haitian, half-Filipino drama streamer really qualified to comment on others’ racial purity? Tune in to find out.
50:46

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I tackle the most pressing issues of our time: redistricting, Somali fraud, and whether a "former" crossdressing communist should be a right-wing thought leader. (1:50) Three things the Trump administration has done well (15:55) Three things the Trump administration could have done better (29:45) Did the GOP lose the redistricting battle? (39:57) Somali fraud in Minnesota In the second half of the show (link in reply), I continue discussing the Somali daycare scandal. What, if anything, will the Trump administration do? With the serious stuff out of the way, I move on to a less serious but more entertaining topic: the saga of “Vrillium,” a content creator in the retard right whose past as a bisexual crossdressing communist was recently exposed. I talk about this new crop of “based” influencers and explain why they are a net negative for the right. This leads to a discussion of Sneako and Clavicular, both of whom recently called JD Vance “subhuman.” I explain why Clavicular’s shtick falls flat for me—and why his attempts at political commentary can be easily dismissed. As for Sneako…is a half-Haitian, half-Filipino drama streamer really qualified to comment on others’ racial purity? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

42,078 次观看 • 7 个月前

On this episode of Restoring Order, I discuss AmFest, the infamous Woman Propaganda slap incident, David Azerrad's essay on the JQ, and more. (0:44) Subscribe or else (1:48) You don't have to apologize for being white anymore (12:06) General thoughts on AmFest, including the speeches given by Tucker and Shapiro (29:18) Academic Agent is one of the dumbest guys on here In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I discuss the AmFest straw poll. What does it say about the state of the right? Switching gears, I recount the Woman Propaganda slap saga. I explain why being thin-skinned online can lead to disaster. Toward the end of the show, I discuss David Azerrad’s recent article on the Jewish question. I outline the parts of the essay with which I agree and offer a few critiques. What might those be? Tune in to find out.
35:46

On this episode of Restoring Order, I discuss AmFest, the infamous Woman Propaganda slap incident, David Azerrad's essay on the JQ, and more. (0:44) Subscribe or else (1:48) You don't have to apologize for being white anymore (12:06) General thoughts on AmFest, including the speeches given by Tucker and Shapiro (29:18) Academic Agent is one of the dumbest guys on here In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I discuss the AmFest straw poll. What does it say about the state of the right? Switching gears, I recount the Woman Propaganda slap saga. I explain why being thin-skinned online can lead to disaster. Toward the end of the show, I discuss David Azerrad’s recent article on the Jewish question. I outline the parts of the essay with which I agree and offer a few critiques. What might those be? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

56,291 次观看 • 7 个月前

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I criticize both the Israeli government and American Israel critics, making no friends in the process and appealing to absolutely no one. (0:38) An update on the admin's investigations into left-wing organizations (15:15) Is Trump going to invade Iran? (28:39) Israel attacking South Pars was unacceptable (40:54) How American and Israeli interests in the ME differ (50:00) Did Israel push us into attacking Iran? In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I review the Washington Post report that suggests JD Vance is considering sitting out the 2028 election. If true, what does this say about the post-Trump GOP? Next up, I talk about Roman Polanski's Chinatown (1974), which I recently rewatched. I outline why it's an incredible film, without spoiling anything. I argue that we need to reject the Chinatown mindset – the view that the world is so irreparably dark and dysfunctional that there's no point in trying to fix it. I also argue that Roman Polanski, while a phenomenal director, is definitely a depraved guy. Toward the end of the show, I review Joe Kent's resignation letter and a few clips from his appearance on Tucker. I also discuss the investigations into both men. Are they guilty? Tune in to find out.
1:00:01

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I criticize both the Israeli government and American Israel critics, making no friends in the process and appealing to absolutely no one. (0:38) An update on the admin's investigations into left-wing organizations (15:15) Is Trump going to invade Iran? (28:39) Israel attacking South Pars was unacceptable (40:54) How American and Israeli interests in the ME differ (50:00) Did Israel push us into attacking Iran? In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), I review the Washington Post report that suggests JD Vance is considering sitting out the 2028 election. If true, what does this say about the post-Trump GOP? Next up, I talk about Roman Polanski's Chinatown (1974), which I recently rewatched. I outline why it's an incredible film, without spoiling anything. I argue that we need to reject the Chinatown mindset – the view that the world is so irreparably dark and dysfunctional that there's no point in trying to fix it. I also argue that Roman Polanski, while a phenomenal director, is definitely a depraved guy. Toward the end of the show, I review Joe Kent's resignation letter and a few clips from his appearance on Tucker. I also discuss the investigations into both men. Are they guilty? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

38,695 次观看 • 5 个月前

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."
2:21

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

348,031 次观看 • 1 个月前

Pete Ricketts voted AGAINST releasing the Epstein Files. Months before, he was asked what he thought about investigating Epstein. Ricketts replied that investigating one of the most notorious sex traffickers in history was a “low priority.” You wanna see what integrity and consistency on this issue looks like? Take notes: Last month I had a fundraiser. One of the guys associated with the fundraiser turned out to be in the Epstein Files (his name had come out a week before so it wasn’t widely known at that point). IMMEDIATELY upon hearing this, I cancelled the fundraiser. Didn’t take me more than 5 minutes to decide. I found out how much this guy donated ($3,300 in 2024) and gave his money to an amazing Nebraska nonprofit who supports victims of child abuse and trafficking. That’s how you do it. Kids being raped on an island by a bunch of billionaire elites will NEVER be a “low priority” to me. Unlike Pete Ricketts, I would vote to release the Epstein Files. I wouldn’t need some massive pressure campaign to get me to change my vote. The Epstein Class wants to protect the Epstein Class.
0:23

Pete Ricketts voted AGAINST releasing the Epstein Files. Months before, he was asked what he thought about investigating Epstein. Ricketts replied that investigating one of the most notorious sex traffickers in history was a “low priority.” You wanna see what integrity and consistency on this issue looks like? Take notes: Last month I had a fundraiser. One of the guys associated with the fundraiser turned out to be in the Epstein Files (his name had come out a week before so it wasn’t widely known at that point). IMMEDIATELY upon hearing this, I cancelled the fundraiser. Didn’t take me more than 5 minutes to decide. I found out how much this guy donated ($3,300 in 2024) and gave his money to an amazing Nebraska nonprofit who supports victims of child abuse and trafficking. That’s how you do it. Kids being raped on an island by a bunch of billionaire elites will NEVER be a “low priority” to me. Unlike Pete Ricketts, I would vote to release the Epstein Files. I wouldn’t need some massive pressure campaign to get me to change my vote. The Epstein Class wants to protect the Epstein Class.

Dan Osborn

32,309 次观看 • 5 个月前

The only parts of the Vanity Fair piece that I find remotely interesting are these two excerpts about the Epstein files: 1) "Wiles told me she underestimated the potency of the scandal: 'Whether he was an American CIA asset, a Mossad asset, whether all these rich, important men went to that nasty island and did unforgivable things to young girls,' she said, 'I mean, I kind of knew it, but it’s never anything I paid a bit of attention to.'" 2) "The Epstein files debacle poses a dire political threat to Trump and the future of the GOP. 'The people that are inordinately interested in Epstein are the new members of the Trump coalition, the people that I think about all the time—because I want to make sure that they are not Trump voters, they’re Republican voters,' Wiles said. 'It’s the Joe Rogan listeners. It’s the people that are sort of new to our world. It’s not the MAGA base.'" It now makes total sense as to why President Trump has—at times—dismissed the Epstein scandal and even called it a "hoax." Over the summer, Trump said he did not understand why many of his supporters were so fixated on Epstein. Well, now why know why he said that—it would seem Susie Wiles was the one misinforming Trump about the MAGA base’s concerns. We care about the Epstein files because we want transparency, we want the elites held accountable, and we want JUSTICE for the Epstein victims.
4:17

The only parts of the Vanity Fair piece that I find remotely interesting are these two excerpts about the Epstein files: 1) "Wiles told me she underestimated the potency of the scandal: 'Whether he was an American CIA asset, a Mossad asset, whether all these rich, important men went to that nasty island and did unforgivable things to young girls,' she said, 'I mean, I kind of knew it, but it’s never anything I paid a bit of attention to.'" 2) "The Epstein files debacle poses a dire political threat to Trump and the future of the GOP. 'The people that are inordinately interested in Epstein are the new members of the Trump coalition, the people that I think about all the time—because I want to make sure that they are not Trump voters, they’re Republican voters,' Wiles said. 'It’s the Joe Rogan listeners. It’s the people that are sort of new to our world. It’s not the MAGA base.'" It now makes total sense as to why President Trump has—at times—dismissed the Epstein scandal and even called it a "hoax." Over the summer, Trump said he did not understand why many of his supporters were so fixated on Epstein. Well, now why know why he said that—it would seem Susie Wiles was the one misinforming Trump about the MAGA base’s concerns. We care about the Epstein files because we want transparency, we want the elites held accountable, and we want JUSTICE for the Epstein victims.

Liz Wheeler

189,082 次观看 • 8 个月前

How in the hell did I miss this? Tom Massey WROTE THE BILL that required Trump DOJ to REDACT THE NAMES in the Epstein files! To be honest, my heart was a little broken at the 180 turn Massey took. I respected him, even when he went against Trump.. I cried when his wife suddenly died.. But after doing this and then SCREECHING about "transparency " of the Epstein files for a freaking year...Ive got to admit..he's a POS The very people involved with Epstein had a couple of decades to get rid of the real evidence. If you can't face that, then you are dumb as a brick
2:42

How in the hell did I miss this? Tom Massey WROTE THE BILL that required Trump DOJ to REDACT THE NAMES in the Epstein files! To be honest, my heart was a little broken at the 180 turn Massey took. I respected him, even when he went against Trump.. I cried when his wife suddenly died.. But after doing this and then SCREECHING about "transparency " of the Epstein files for a freaking year...Ive got to admit..he's a POS The very people involved with Epstein had a couple of decades to get rid of the real evidence. If you can't face that, then you are dumb as a brick

Bama_Jeans

177,464 次观看 • 3 个月前

Democrat goes quiet after Lauren Boebert fires off two simple questions about Trump and the Epstein Files. James Talarico suggested that Trump was somehow implicated because of the number of times he was mentioned in the Files. But his framing unraveled when Boebert asked him these questions. JAMES TALARICO: “QAnon was wrong about one big thing: They thought Donald Trump was the one to take down this secret p—phile ring when he is mentioned 38,000 times in the Epstein files. He flew repeatedly on Epstein's private jet and then lied about it.” BOEBERT: “Who is the president right now?” TALARICO: “President Trump.” BOEBERT: “Who signed the order to release the Files?” [TALARICO STUTTERS, THEN GOES QUIET] BOEBERT: “President Trump did.” Bill Maher then jumped in — backing Boebert’s position, not Talarico’s. He pointed out that in 2006, as Epstein’s crimes first came under investigation, Trump called the Palm Beach police chief to thank him for pursuing the case and putting a stop to Epstein.
1:17

Democrat goes quiet after Lauren Boebert fires off two simple questions about Trump and the Epstein Files. James Talarico suggested that Trump was somehow implicated because of the number of times he was mentioned in the Files. But his framing unraveled when Boebert asked him these questions. JAMES TALARICO: “QAnon was wrong about one big thing: They thought Donald Trump was the one to take down this secret p—phile ring when he is mentioned 38,000 times in the Epstein files. He flew repeatedly on Epstein's private jet and then lied about it.” BOEBERT: “Who is the president right now?” TALARICO: “President Trump.” BOEBERT: “Who signed the order to release the Files?” [TALARICO STUTTERS, THEN GOES QUIET] BOEBERT: “President Trump did.” Bill Maher then jumped in — backing Boebert’s position, not Talarico’s. He pointed out that in 2006, as Epstein’s crimes first came under investigation, Trump called the Palm Beach police chief to thank him for pursuing the case and putting a stop to Epstein.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

874,265 次观看 • 6 个月前

Brett Meiselas on MTG: The craziest thing about this is it's not like she even said anything bad about Trump. Nor did she even suggest he was involved with Jeffrey Epstein. All she said was that the people deserve the Epstein files — and he lost his mind. That’s the definition of “a hit dog will holler.” Trump said that by calling for the release of the Epstein files, Marjorie Taylor Greene has betrayed him and the entire Republican Party. Just pause for a second. Why would Marjorie Taylor Greene calling to release the Epstein files be a betrayal to Donald Trump and the entire Republican Party? Unless they are afraid of what is in said files.
0:55

Brett Meiselas on MTG: The craziest thing about this is it's not like she even said anything bad about Trump. Nor did she even suggest he was involved with Jeffrey Epstein. All she said was that the people deserve the Epstein files — and he lost his mind. That’s the definition of “a hit dog will holler.” Trump said that by calling for the release of the Epstein files, Marjorie Taylor Greene has betrayed him and the entire Republican Party. Just pause for a second. Why would Marjorie Taylor Greene calling to release the Epstein files be a betrayal to Donald Trump and the entire Republican Party? Unless they are afraid of what is in said files.

MeidasTouch

238,797 次观看 • 9 个月前

Everything you know about Jeffrey Epstein is a lie. Michael Tracey joins me to discuss the real Epstein: who he was, what he did, and why people get him wrong. (1:14) Michael Tracey's origin story (9:13) Why most of the Epstein books and documentaries are trash (10:45) Who was Jeffrey Epstein? (19:04) How Epstein got his money (29:00) Influencers manipulate their audiences with dishonest questions In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), we explain why picking apart the Epstein conspiracy theories doesn't constitute "defending Epstein." I then ask Michael what we know for certain that Epstein did wrong, and he takes us through the infamous 2005 Palm Beach case. We talk about how this case proves Epstein was a perverted criminal, but explain why this falls short of the Epstein conspiracy theories. We discuss Little Saint James. I ask Michael if there was a single documented instance of an underage girl visiting the island. This leads to a discussion on some of Epstein's most outspoken victims, whose claims are more than a little questionable. Toward the end, we consider the popular belief that Epstein "belonged to intelligence." Michael outlines this quote's origins and argues that it shouldn't be taken seriously. Why is that? Tune in to find out.
35:35

Everything you know about Jeffrey Epstein is a lie. Michael Tracey joins me to discuss the real Epstein: who he was, what he did, and why people get him wrong. (1:14) Michael Tracey's origin story (9:13) Why most of the Epstein books and documentaries are trash (10:45) Who was Jeffrey Epstein? (19:04) How Epstein got his money (29:00) Influencers manipulate their audiences with dishonest questions In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), we explain why picking apart the Epstein conspiracy theories doesn't constitute "defending Epstein." I then ask Michael what we know for certain that Epstein did wrong, and he takes us through the infamous 2005 Palm Beach case. We talk about how this case proves Epstein was a perverted criminal, but explain why this falls short of the Epstein conspiracy theories. We discuss Little Saint James. I ask Michael if there was a single documented instance of an underage girl visiting the island. This leads to a discussion on some of Epstein's most outspoken victims, whose claims are more than a little questionable. Toward the end, we consider the popular belief that Epstein "belonged to intelligence." Michael outlines this quote's origins and argues that it shouldn't be taken seriously. Why is that? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

144,728 次观看 • 7 个月前

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I explore the most defining issues of our time: Trump's fraud task force, Massie's hush money scandal, and the slur-saying livestreamer who recently shot someone known as Chud the Builder. (1:30) Subscribe or else! (2:51) Fraud task force updates (8:03) Republicans must reliably deliver on immigration, crime, fraud, and the economy (15:52) OPT fraud (22:01) I can't even imagine what it's like to be retarded grifter (24:17) The Matrix ATTACKS Thomas Massie! (32:18) Is the Massie hush money scandal a big deal? (36:59) The problem with Thomas Massie In the second half of the show (link in reply), I wrap up the Massie stuff by taking a look at his polling numbers. He's down in the latest poll overall, but young people in his district love him – similar to James Fishback. What does this say about the future of right-wing politics? I then switch gears to discuss Chud the Builder. He was recently hit with several charges, including attempted murder, after shooting a mentally unstable black guy with a criminal record. I marvel at how such a crude form of internet content can have so many dimensions. I talk about the legal, political, cultural, and racial dynamics involved in the Chud the Builder phenomenon. I argue that while people have free speech, it's probably unwise to antagonize others while armed. But that doesn't give angry black people the right to attack him. I then zoom out a bit to examine the big picture. Why is Chud's content so popular? I explain that, whatever you make of the man and his content, there is a certain type of fatigue spreading throughout the country. What type might that be? Tune in to find out.
41:36

On the latest episode of Restoring Order, I explore the most defining issues of our time: Trump's fraud task force, Massie's hush money scandal, and the slur-saying livestreamer who recently shot someone known as Chud the Builder. (1:30) Subscribe or else! (2:51) Fraud task force updates (8:03) Republicans must reliably deliver on immigration, crime, fraud, and the economy (15:52) OPT fraud (22:01) I can't even imagine what it's like to be retarded grifter (24:17) The Matrix ATTACKS Thomas Massie! (32:18) Is the Massie hush money scandal a big deal? (36:59) The problem with Thomas Massie In the second half of the show (link in reply), I wrap up the Massie stuff by taking a look at his polling numbers. He's down in the latest poll overall, but young people in his district love him – similar to James Fishback. What does this say about the future of right-wing politics? I then switch gears to discuss Chud the Builder. He was recently hit with several charges, including attempted murder, after shooting a mentally unstable black guy with a criminal record. I marvel at how such a crude form of internet content can have so many dimensions. I talk about the legal, political, cultural, and racial dynamics involved in the Chud the Builder phenomenon. I argue that while people have free speech, it's probably unwise to antagonize others while armed. But that doesn't give angry black people the right to attack him. I then zoom out a bit to examine the big picture. Why is Chud's content so popular? I explain that, whatever you make of the man and his content, there is a certain type of fatigue spreading throughout the country. What type might that be? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

26,036 次观看 • 3 个月前

VANCE: “The Epstein Files Transparency Act, the one that president signed, the one that led to all these files that we’re seeing, the emails...” “By the way Joy, again, I do have to defend my boss.” “I know you guys don’t always appreciate this.” “One of the things you see in the Epstein emails is that Jeffrey Epstein hated Donald Trump and that Donald Trump literally reported Jeffrey Epstein to the police.” “That’s one of the things that came out of the files.” NAVARRO: “They were best friends for about a decade...” VANCE: “Let me respond to that.” “Number one is, yes, Donald Trump, he’s said this.” “He knew Jeffrey Epstein back in the 1980s, he also threw Epstein out of his club when he found out he was a creep and reported him to the police.” “That’s something the media misses when it reports the story.” “They tell the fact they knew each other in 80s, which the president himself admits. They ignore the fact that he narced on him to police and led ultimately to Jeffrey Epstein’s downfall.”
1:06

VANCE: “The Epstein Files Transparency Act, the one that president signed, the one that led to all these files that we’re seeing, the emails...” “By the way Joy, again, I do have to defend my boss.” “I know you guys don’t always appreciate this.” “One of the things you see in the Epstein emails is that Jeffrey Epstein hated Donald Trump and that Donald Trump literally reported Jeffrey Epstein to the police.” “That’s one of the things that came out of the files.” NAVARRO: “They were best friends for about a decade...” VANCE: “Let me respond to that.” “Number one is, yes, Donald Trump, he’s said this.” “He knew Jeffrey Epstein back in the 1980s, he also threw Epstein out of his club when he found out he was a creep and reported him to the police.” “That’s something the media misses when it reports the story.” “They tell the fact they knew each other in 80s, which the president himself admits. They ignore the fact that he narced on him to police and led ultimately to Jeffrey Epstein’s downfall.”

Overton

710,220 次观看 • 2 个月前

.James Talarico: “QAnon was wrong about one big thing. They thought Donald Trump was the one to take down this secret pedophile ring when he is mentioned 38,000 times in the Epstein files. He flew repeatedly on Epstein's private jet and then lied about it. He sent Epstein a happy birthday card with a picture of a naked woman talking about their ‘wonderful secret.’ So the fact that QAnon thought that guy was going to take down the secret pedophile ring when he's right in the middle of it, I think was clearly wrong.”
0:31

.James Talarico: “QAnon was wrong about one big thing. They thought Donald Trump was the one to take down this secret pedophile ring when he is mentioned 38,000 times in the Epstein files. He flew repeatedly on Epstein's private jet and then lied about it. He sent Epstein a happy birthday card with a picture of a naked woman talking about their ‘wonderful secret.’ So the fact that QAnon thought that guy was going to take down the secret pedophile ring when he's right in the middle of it, I think was clearly wrong.”

Team Talarico

65,215 次观看 • 5 个月前