正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Does the right frequency kill cancer cells? Ted Talk from 2011

760,411 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

KAA 的头像
KAA1 年前

I’m telling you frequency is where it’s at. Ask yourself where are all the church bells!

Thionne 的头像
Thionne1 年前

Yes, there is a whole study about this. Many people truth the years have proven this works, but the pharmaceutical cartel always finds away to silence it.

Tape 的头像
Tape1 年前

Dr. Tullio Simoncini - Cancer, Fungus and Sodium Bicarbonate by iHelathTube

the Morne Trulah Estate, Saint Lucia 的头像
the Morne Trulah Estate, Saint Lucia1 年前

Frequencies between 100,000 Hz and 300,000 Hz (100 kHz to 300 kHz) are in the **radiofrequency (RF) range** of the electromagnetic spectrum, specifically within the low-frequency end of the RF spectrum. The potential for these frequencies to cause cellular damage depends on several factors, including the intensity (power level) of the radiation, the duration of exposure, and the specific type of biological tissue. Here’s an overview of how such frequencies might interact with biological cells: ### 1. **Thermal Effects**: - At sufficiently high power levels, RF frequencies, including those in the 100-300 kHz range, can cause **thermal effects**, which is heating of tissues. This is similar to how a microwave oven works by heating water molecules in food. Prolonged exposure to high-intensity RF radiation can result in tissue heating and potentially cellular damage due to increased temperature. - **Cell damage from heat** can result in protein denaturation, disruption of cellular membranes, and even cell death. However, at low power levels, these frequencies are unlikely to generate significant thermal effects. ### 2. **Non-Thermal Effects**: - There is ongoing research into the **non-thermal effects** of RF exposure, such as potential changes in cell function or stress responses. Some studies have suggested that RF exposure might lead to oxidative stress or changes in gene expression, but the evidence is inconsistent and remains controversial. - Frequencies in the 100-300 kHz range are unlikely to ionize atoms or molecules (as ionizing radiation does) and thus are less likely to directly damage DNA or cellular structures through non-thermal mechanisms, especially at low power levels. ### 3. **Biological Effects on Different Cell Types**: - **Cell types** vary in their sensitivity to RF exposure. For example, rapidly dividing cells or cells with high metabolic activity, such as neurons or reproductive cells, may be more susceptible to damage from RF-induced heating compared to more resilient cell types, like muscle cells. - RF radiation has been studied in relation to **cancer risk** (particularly in the context of high-frequency RF such as those used in telecommunications), but conclusive evidence linking low-frequency RF exposure to cancer or widespread cellular damage is lacking at typical exposure levels. ### 4. **Regulatory Guidelines**: - Organizations like the **International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)** and **Federal Communications Commission (FCC)** set guidelines for safe exposure to RF radiation. These guidelines are based on the avoidance of thermal effects, as non-thermal effects are less well understood. - For frequencies in the 100-300 kHz range, exposure limits are designed to prevent significant heating, which would mitigate the risk of cellular damage under normal conditions. ### Conclusion: RF frequencies in the range of 100,000 to 300,000 Hz **do not inherently cause cellular damage** across all cell types unless the intensity is high enough to induce significant heating. Under normal environmental exposure conditions, such as those encountered with most communication devices, the risk of cellular damage is minimal. However, extremely high-power RF sources could potentially cause thermal damage, particularly to more sensitive tissues. If you're considering a specific context or power source for these frequencies, it would be important to look at the intensity and duration of exposure to assess the risk properly.

The Gashington Post 的头像
The Gashington Post1 年前

When he said about them not even knowing they’re sick and blue pinkinsh lights above them, painlessly healing them 🥺

DJ Kinjo 的头像
DJ Kinjo1 年前

Its actually two frequencies, the cancer cell activation (resonance) frequency and the self destruct frequency. But they must be done via plasma light. Remember those big bulbs in Egyptian carvings… plasma light bulbs. 2 because you need two frequencies. Activation and stimulation.

Konner Veteto 的头像
Konner Veteto1 年前

Frequency can heal everything in our universe we live in

Matthew Rife 的头像
Matthew Rife1 年前

It would be amazing if true, huh?

NCC-1701G 🇮🇪 的头像
NCC-1701G 🇮🇪1 年前

Dude, human hearing drops off around 20khz, thats 20.000 Hz. Theres no bell on earth that resonates up at 100,000Hz.

Sandra Douglas 的头像
Sandra Douglas1 年前

My hubby teaches engineering technology. We used frequency technology to heal my Lyme disease!

相关视频