正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Donald Hoffman: "Neurons do not exist when they are not perceived" The Neuroscientist told Neil deGrasse Tyson that the universe only exists when you look at it just like a video game. They discussed the links between DMT & Simulation Theory. Perceptions are like a VR headset that only...

InterstellarUAP's profile picture

Interstellar

136,199 subscribers

36,685 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Just take a good look at this! 2026 Moon Now, when I tell you that “We” the United States Intelligence Community, WE MONITOR Alien Activity on the moon…. And like this WHISTLEBLOWER has stated over and over…. They are INSIDE OF THE MOON THEY ARE Mining the Moon and that is why it rings like a bell when something hits it… This is what we used to monitor Jon Stewart Patrick Jackson
1:30

Just take a good look at this! 2026 Moon Now, when I tell you that “We” the United States Intelligence Community, WE MONITOR Alien Activity on the moon…. And like this WHISTLEBLOWER has stated over and over…. They are INSIDE OF THE MOON THEY ARE Mining the Moon and that is why it rings like a bell when something hits it… This is what we used to monitor Jon Stewart Patrick Jackson

Eddie Abbott

1,253,788 次观看 • 5 个月前

ELON MUSK: The only way to reach 1,000 terawatts of AI power is a mass driver on the Moon. "In order to get to 1,000x from a terawatt per year. The only way that we can really achieve that is on the moon with a mass driver, essentially where you do local production of photovoltaics and radiators on the moon, maybe you bring the chips from Earth, or you could conceivably make the chips on the moon, and but you need most of the mass to be made on the moon, so you don't have to transport it to the moon from Earth, and then because the moon has no atmosphere and only 1/6 Earth's gravity, you can accelerate the AI satellites into deep space without a rocket, so you can basically shoot them into space using an electromagnetic gun, like a, like a rail gun type. I mean, just, it's basically a linear electric motor, as a way to think about it."
1:06

ELON MUSK: The only way to reach 1,000 terawatts of AI power is a mass driver on the Moon. "In order to get to 1,000x from a terawatt per year. The only way that we can really achieve that is on the moon with a mass driver, essentially where you do local production of photovoltaics and radiators on the moon, maybe you bring the chips from Earth, or you could conceivably make the chips on the moon, and but you need most of the mass to be made on the moon, so you don't have to transport it to the moon from Earth, and then because the moon has no atmosphere and only 1/6 Earth's gravity, you can accelerate the AI satellites into deep space without a rocket, so you can basically shoot them into space using an electromagnetic gun, like a, like a rail gun type. I mean, just, it's basically a linear electric motor, as a way to think about it."

DogeDesigner

122,205 次观看 • 28 天前

Right now… I see the Sun ☀️ and the Moon 🌙 above me — just like this. Both circling above our flat plane… Not 93 million miles away. Not spinning through “space.” This is the real clock. A divine timepiece — with the Sun marking the hour as it rotates around the center. They told us it was a spinning ball… But look up — and you’ll see the truth for yourself.
0:31

Right now… I see the Sun ☀️ and the Moon 🌙 above me — just like this. Both circling above our flat plane… Not 93 million miles away. Not spinning through “space.” This is the real clock. A divine timepiece — with the Sun marking the hour as it rotates around the center. They told us it was a spinning ball… But look up — and you’ll see the truth for yourself.

vegastar

60,334 次观看 • 1 年前

Have you ever thought about how extremely unlikely it is that, despite the Sun being 400x bigger than the Moon, it appears the EXACT same size in our sky? The official NASA narrative is that this is simply because, in addition to it being 400x bigger than the Moon, it's also 400x further away. But the odds of this are infinitesimally small. What if...the Sun and Moon look like they're the exact same size, because they ARE the same size? Question everything, friends...
2:39

Have you ever thought about how extremely unlikely it is that, despite the Sun being 400x bigger than the Moon, it appears the EXACT same size in our sky? The official NASA narrative is that this is simply because, in addition to it being 400x bigger than the Moon, it's also 400x further away. But the odds of this are infinitesimally small. What if...the Sun and Moon look like they're the exact same size, because they ARE the same size? Question everything, friends...

₿en Wehrman

97,643 次观看 • 4 个月前

[Heo Seongbeom Youtube] 260305 Jin - Moon 🌕🌏 (part1) 👨‍🏫It’s a solo song by Jin, and BTS are also preparing for a comeback in March. I’m really looking forward to it. I’m the moon, and you are the Earth. So it becomes a kind of love triangle. Earlier the sea loved the moon, but who does the moon love? The moon loves the Earth. That idea is reflected in this song, so let’s try interpreting it. Since when have the moon and the Earth been together like this? We’ve been together for so long, but when did it start? About 4.51 to 4.53 billion years ago. Scientists figured this out through radioactive isotope analysis, which showed that the Moon is about 4.51 to 4.53 billion years old. “Shining just by existing.” This line is directed at the Earth. But does the Earth actually shine just by existing? No. Because the Earth is a planet and does not produce its own light. If the Earth appears to shine, it’s probably because of artificial lights made by humans. “Can I stay by your side and protect you?” It sounds shy, but in reality the moon can’t help staying there, because it’s bound by gravity. And here we see the main line of the song. “You are my Earth, and to you I’m just a moon. Your small star that lights up your heart.” It’s poetic, but is the moon actually a star? No. Celestial bodies are generally divided into two categories. First, there are stars (stellar bodies). These produce their own light. Second, there are planets. Planets do not produce their own light. Instead, planets usually orbit around a star. The Earth is a planet. From our perspective, the star in our system is the Sun. So when you look at the night sky and see stars, those lights are actually other suns, each producing their own light. But sometimes when you see a particularly bright “star,” it may actually be a planet like Mercury, Venus, Mars, or Jupiter. Then you might ask: if planets don’t produce their own light, why do they shine? Because they reflect sunlight. The Moon also appears bright because it reflects the Sun’s light. #JIN #방탄소년단진 방탄소년단
6:51

[Heo Seongbeom Youtube] 260305 Jin - Moon 🌕🌏 (part1) 👨‍🏫It’s a solo song by Jin, and BTS are also preparing for a comeback in March. I’m really looking forward to it. I’m the moon, and you are the Earth. So it becomes a kind of love triangle. Earlier the sea loved the moon, but who does the moon love? The moon loves the Earth. That idea is reflected in this song, so let’s try interpreting it. Since when have the moon and the Earth been together like this? We’ve been together for so long, but when did it start? About 4.51 to 4.53 billion years ago. Scientists figured this out through radioactive isotope analysis, which showed that the Moon is about 4.51 to 4.53 billion years old. “Shining just by existing.” This line is directed at the Earth. But does the Earth actually shine just by existing? No. Because the Earth is a planet and does not produce its own light. If the Earth appears to shine, it’s probably because of artificial lights made by humans. “Can I stay by your side and protect you?” It sounds shy, but in reality the moon can’t help staying there, because it’s bound by gravity. And here we see the main line of the song. “You are my Earth, and to you I’m just a moon. Your small star that lights up your heart.” It’s poetic, but is the moon actually a star? No. Celestial bodies are generally divided into two categories. First, there are stars (stellar bodies). These produce their own light. Second, there are planets. Planets do not produce their own light. Instead, planets usually orbit around a star. The Earth is a planet. From our perspective, the star in our system is the Sun. So when you look at the night sky and see stars, those lights are actually other suns, each producing their own light. But sometimes when you see a particularly bright “star,” it may actually be a planet like Mercury, Venus, Mars, or Jupiter. Then you might ask: if planets don’t produce their own light, why do they shine? Because they reflect sunlight. The Moon also appears bright because it reflects the Sun’s light. #JIN #방탄소년단진 방탄소년단

star_jin

19,019 次观看 • 4 个月前

MOON MYSTERY DEEPENS: IT’S TOO BIG, TOO WEIRD, TOO PERFECT Our Moon is officially the drama queen of the Solar System. For starters, it’s way too big for its place, about a quarter the size of Earth, and orbits in a perfect little circle like it’s showing off. And it just happens to look exactly the same size as the Sun from our POV. Scientists call a “cosmic coincidence,” but conspiracy fans call it “definitely suspicious.” The leading theory is that the Moon was born from a cataclysmic smash-up between early Earth and a Mars-sized body named Theia. But here’s where it gets juicy: Apollo missions once crashed spacecraft into the Moon, and it “rang” for hours. Scientists said it was like “a bell,” which sounds spooky until you realize it’s just because the Moon is bone-dry and cracked like a giant space gong, not hollow like sci-fi claims. So is the Moon an alien surveillance base? Scientists say no, but if it winks at you tonight, maybe close the curtains. Source: Filip Zieba
4:51

MOON MYSTERY DEEPENS: IT’S TOO BIG, TOO WEIRD, TOO PERFECT Our Moon is officially the drama queen of the Solar System. For starters, it’s way too big for its place, about a quarter the size of Earth, and orbits in a perfect little circle like it’s showing off. And it just happens to look exactly the same size as the Sun from our POV. Scientists call a “cosmic coincidence,” but conspiracy fans call it “definitely suspicious.” The leading theory is that the Moon was born from a cataclysmic smash-up between early Earth and a Mars-sized body named Theia. But here’s where it gets juicy: Apollo missions once crashed spacecraft into the Moon, and it “rang” for hours. Scientists said it was like “a bell,” which sounds spooky until you realize it’s just because the Moon is bone-dry and cracked like a giant space gong, not hollow like sci-fi claims. So is the Moon an alien surveillance base? Scientists say no, but if it winks at you tonight, maybe close the curtains. Source: Filip Zieba

Mario Nawfal

118,454 次观看 • 11 个月前

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."
5:30

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,350 次观看 • 3 年前

🇺🇸DAVID FRIEDBERG: AI VIDEO GENERATORS ARE SET TO CHANGE ENTERTAINMENT 'Genesis renders the actual 3D objects into a 3D environment rather than rendering a two-dimensional set of pixels to look like a video. Suddenly, you can actually render in real-time: a video game, a movie, a visual experience. And it goes to this point that we're unleashing the capacity for human imagination and creativity with these systems because it's no longer just a look-a-like 2-dimensional image. Source: The All-In Podcast, david friedberg
2:12

🇺🇸DAVID FRIEDBERG: AI VIDEO GENERATORS ARE SET TO CHANGE ENTERTAINMENT 'Genesis renders the actual 3D objects into a 3D environment rather than rendering a two-dimensional set of pixels to look like a video. Suddenly, you can actually render in real-time: a video game, a movie, a visual experience. And it goes to this point that we're unleashing the capacity for human imagination and creativity with these systems because it's no longer just a look-a-like 2-dimensional image. Source: The All-In Podcast, david friedberg

Mario Nawfal

82,293 次观看 • 1 年前

Donald Hoffman: "Spacetime is not fundamental. This is not the final reality. We are just observing this reality through a VR headset" At the Planck scale, spacetime falls apart. No operational meaning to distances or time below about 10^-33 cm and 10^-43 seconds. Physicists like Nima Arkani-Hamed and David Gross agree: Spacetime is doomed. Our perceptions evolved for fitness payoffs, not truth. Objects, space, and time are a user interface hiding something far deeper: consciousness as fundamental. "Death is just stepping out of this headset." Whatever is beyond is utterly unlike spacetime. UFOs & The Paranormal are perhaps glitches in the matrix from outside the game.
7:07

Donald Hoffman: "Spacetime is not fundamental. This is not the final reality. We are just observing this reality through a VR headset" At the Planck scale, spacetime falls apart. No operational meaning to distances or time below about 10^-33 cm and 10^-43 seconds. Physicists like Nima Arkani-Hamed and David Gross agree: Spacetime is doomed. Our perceptions evolved for fitness payoffs, not truth. Objects, space, and time are a user interface hiding something far deeper: consciousness as fundamental. "Death is just stepping out of this headset." Whatever is beyond is utterly unlike spacetime. UFOs & The Paranormal are perhaps glitches in the matrix from outside the game.

Interstellar

29,908 次观看 • 29 天前

🚨The Reptilians, Do they all have a Bad agenda for Humans?🚨 "Well, they look like you and I, but when you, look them in the eye and they get a little angry at you, they're, they get a little slit eye and that slit eye is like, oh, okay, there's a reptilian there. " "But not all reptilians are bad like we talk about, and not all, Draco Reptilian are bad."
1:23

🚨The Reptilians, Do they all have a Bad agenda for Humans?🚨 "Well, they look like you and I, but when you, look them in the eye and they get a little angry at you, they're, they get a little slit eye and that slit eye is like, oh, okay, there's a reptilian there. " "But not all reptilians are bad like we talk about, and not all, Draco Reptilian are bad."

UAPWixy

81,669 次观看 • 3 个月前

Realism over renders - NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman. Full interview available in a few hours. "Everything we do at NASA is pretty ambitious, right? I mean, it should be, we're NASA on that. "But we could have put this like, you know, wild 3D rendering of the glass dome on the Moon with plants in it and a Ferris wheel and kids having fun or something and be like, 'okay, that looks pretty wild' and never would happen, right? Like, we're actually trying to do pretty challenging things. "But in a logical, iterative way, a phased approach to getting to the outcomes that we want to see. That's why, like phase one, I've described to people, hey, the Moon might look like a junkyard. There could be a lot of broken down rovers and landers somewhere, you know, all around the south pole of the Moon. "But you know what? We're learning."
0:40

Realism over renders - NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman. Full interview available in a few hours. "Everything we do at NASA is pretty ambitious, right? I mean, it should be, we're NASA on that. "But we could have put this like, you know, wild 3D rendering of the glass dome on the Moon with plants in it and a Ferris wheel and kids having fun or something and be like, 'okay, that looks pretty wild' and never would happen, right? Like, we're actually trying to do pretty challenging things. "But in a logical, iterative way, a phased approach to getting to the outcomes that we want to see. That's why, like phase one, I've described to people, hey, the Moon might look like a junkyard. There could be a lot of broken down rovers and landers somewhere, you know, all around the south pole of the Moon. "But you know what? We're learning."

NSF - NASASpaceflight.com

28,963 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 NASA IS LIGHTING FIRES ON THE MOON — WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY HIDING UP THERE? This is becoming increasingly strange. While NASA and private companies push forward with new lunar missions, many are asking a serious question: Why are they conducting what appear to be fire or energy experiments on the moon? Some see it as nothing more than a massive money grab. Others like David Icke believe something far deeper is going on. That the moon may not be natural at all. That it was brought here, could be hollow, and is being used as a massive sensor or control system for humanity. The moon has long been surrounded by anomalies that defy conventional explanation. The official narrative has more holes than it has answers. And many of the public faces of these missions look and feel more like actors than explorers. Why the hell is NASA lighting fires on the moon, and what are they really using it for?
3:07

🚨 NASA IS LIGHTING FIRES ON THE MOON — WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY HIDING UP THERE? This is becoming increasingly strange. While NASA and private companies push forward with new lunar missions, many are asking a serious question: Why are they conducting what appear to be fire or energy experiments on the moon? Some see it as nothing more than a massive money grab. Others like David Icke believe something far deeper is going on. That the moon may not be natural at all. That it was brought here, could be hollow, and is being used as a massive sensor or control system for humanity. The moon has long been surrounded by anomalies that defy conventional explanation. The official narrative has more holes than it has answers. And many of the public faces of these missions look and feel more like actors than explorers. Why the hell is NASA lighting fires on the moon, and what are they really using it for?

HustleBitch

20,719 次观看 • 4 天前

Mikel Arteta’s beautiful praise to his staff and players. “That's when you have a difficult period. I think the best thing that you can do instead of talk a lot is observe. Look around you and see how people react. How they talk, how they look at you, how they judge you, what they do. Do they look at themselves, do they start to criticise other people? “Look around and you're going to learn the environment and the people that you have around you. “I cannot be prouder to work in a club with people that the only thing they could do is ask, what else can I do to help? “When you have people like this, I don't know if it's gonna take another week or two, but something good it will happen at the end because we deserve it.”
0:53

Mikel Arteta’s beautiful praise to his staff and players. “That's when you have a difficult period. I think the best thing that you can do instead of talk a lot is observe. Look around you and see how people react. How they talk, how they look at you, how they judge you, what they do. Do they look at themselves, do they start to criticise other people? “Look around and you're going to learn the environment and the people that you have around you. “I cannot be prouder to work in a club with people that the only thing they could do is ask, what else can I do to help? “When you have people like this, I don't know if it's gonna take another week or two, but something good it will happen at the end because we deserve it.”

Connor Humm

48,588 次观看 • 3 个月前

IAN CARROLL saw "the room" below the TRAP DOOR/ access panel. It is "big enough to stand up in and move around" So please stop telling me that there is nothing under there. The only question is how big is it. It goes at least a few feet in the direction of Charlie Kirk. He was only 10 feet away at most. I will not concede this point until I see a video of the inside of that space. I have a standing bounty of $1000 For that footage. DM me for details. P.S. I don't claim to know this for a fact but as far as I can tell no one has produced a theory that makes 💯 sense yet and until then I shall be keeping an open mind. Especially when Brian Harpole now claims "it doesn't exist" why? and why did they tair up the surrounding area and pave it over so quickly? Also just look at the physics of the body ☝️ Thank you 🙏
3:58

IAN CARROLL saw "the room" below the TRAP DOOR/ access panel. It is "big enough to stand up in and move around" So please stop telling me that there is nothing under there. The only question is how big is it. It goes at least a few feet in the direction of Charlie Kirk. He was only 10 feet away at most. I will not concede this point until I see a video of the inside of that space. I have a standing bounty of $1000 For that footage. DM me for details. P.S. I don't claim to know this for a fact but as far as I can tell no one has produced a theory that makes 💯 sense yet and until then I shall be keeping an open mind. Especially when Brian Harpole now claims "it doesn't exist" why? and why did they tair up the surrounding area and pave it over so quickly? Also just look at the physics of the body ☝️ Thank you 🙏

Matt Baker

108,970 次观看 • 7 个月前

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."
1:51

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

373,778 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.
0:59

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Kevin Tanaka

10,256 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨NEW: Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey Answers “What Would War Look Like on The Moon?” “Usually I’m thinking about how [to] use the Moon as part of a war-fighting strategy that is earth-focused” “The Moon would be a great place for large phased arrays that can do a variety of electronic warfare schemes.” “Almost any level of [Moon] warfare is catastrophic for both sides that are engaging in it.” “Unless you’re able to do some really creative stuff like put yourself inside a lava tube or in an asteroid.” “I guess warfare on the Moon is going to be decisive and swift and catastrophic… until we get much better at building space technology.” It’s time to build the United States Space Empire. 🇺🇸 (see linked post)
1:06

🚨NEW: Anduril Founder Palmer Luckey Answers “What Would War Look Like on The Moon?” “Usually I’m thinking about how [to] use the Moon as part of a war-fighting strategy that is earth-focused” “The Moon would be a great place for large phased arrays that can do a variety of electronic warfare schemes.” “Almost any level of [Moon] warfare is catastrophic for both sides that are engaging in it.” “Unless you’re able to do some really creative stuff like put yourself inside a lava tube or in an asteroid.” “I guess warfare on the Moon is going to be decisive and swift and catastrophic… until we get much better at building space technology.” It’s time to build the United States Space Empire. 🇺🇸 (see linked post)

Anduril Appreciator

125,319 次观看 • 6 个月前

What's Missing From This Solar Eclipse? 🌞🌖 Have you ever stopped to think that when you see a solar eclipse, you never see the moon before or after the eclipse? Most people don't. What we see is a black circle appearing out of nowhere and moving across the face of the sun. The point being, a solar eclipse is not what they taught you in school. Nobody knows exactly what it is, but without a doubt, it's not the moon blocking out the sun.
1:04

What's Missing From This Solar Eclipse? 🌞🌖 Have you ever stopped to think that when you see a solar eclipse, you never see the moon before or after the eclipse? Most people don't. What we see is a black circle appearing out of nowhere and moving across the face of the sun. The point being, a solar eclipse is not what they taught you in school. Nobody knows exactly what it is, but without a doubt, it's not the moon blocking out the sun.

vegastar

2,393,972 次观看 • 2 年前

Saying you recognize Israel’s right to exist, but not as a Jewish state, is like saying Japan has a right to exist, just not as a country for the Japanese. Hey Zohran Kwame Mamdani, Israel exists. And it exists as a Jewish state. We don't need your validation.
1:00

Saying you recognize Israel’s right to exist, but not as a Jewish state, is like saying Japan has a right to exist, just not as a country for the Japanese. Hey Zohran Kwame Mamdani, Israel exists. And it exists as a Jewish state. We don't need your validation.

HonestReporting

22,314 次观看 • 9 个月前