正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Downey: Not everything is woke. I think we're abusing the term a little bit too much, where it's losing its meaning, and that's really important because some things actually are woke and we should call it like it is

Acyn

769,075 subscribers

38,856 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Why cold 🥑 does not like the term "woke 2.0": "Woke has all this intrinsic baggage. Maybe they'll adopt it, but it'll be in a joking way, which I guess is what woke 2.0 is purports to be. Woke 2.0, kind of like the original woke is used both by its proponents and by its critics." "A lot of like what the right is doing now is a lot of that same policing... a lot of like similar language policing." "I think it's just sort of a trait in some ways. Not even of woke, but just of the internet when it's in power. Like that's just kind of how it works."

Why cold 🥑 does not like the term "woke 2.0": "Woke has all this intrinsic baggage. Maybe they'll adopt it, but it'll be in a joking way, which I guess is what woke 2.0 is purports to be. Woke 2.0, kind of like the original woke is used both by its proponents and by its critics." "A lot of like what the right is doing now is a lot of that same policing... a lot of like similar language policing." "I think it's just sort of a trait in some ways. Not even of woke, but just of the internet when it's in power. Like that's just kind of how it works."

MTS

40,699 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jordan Peterson explained the Woke Right ("Alt Right") back in 2018. It's not new, but two things are. 1) It's making a concerted bid for power in mainstream conservative spaces now and significantly succeed after years of infiltration 2) We know what makes them "Alt" is Woke. There's an interesting additional point here that's very important. Peterson is talking about how the Left tried to label him "Alt Right" as a polarizing smear. The Woke Left could do that because it can draw a distinction between itself and the reaction it created so long as there's distinction in the names. They could make it seem like there was a sprawling Alt Right that's really evil and scary and only the Woke Left can resist it. Peterson was having to defy this at considerable effort, and much of the Left didn't buy it anyway. This is the dialectic. The term "Woke Right" throws a monkey wrench into this dialectical program and breaks the machine. The (Woke) Left can post up and do the dialectic against any name for it except "Woke Right." The reason is that the term "Woke Right" is derivative to Woke, so you cannot think of the Woke Right without also thinking of the Woke Left, which is the referent. What makes the Woke Right bad is being almost just like the Woke Left. "Woke," not Left or Right, becomes the problem, short-circuiting the dialectic and neutering the Left on this dimension of their united front tactics. It therefore puts the problem squarely where it belongs: on Woke. This frees people up to consider Left and Right (better: liberal and conservative) outside of the polarizing game of radical extremes. It was this factor that ultimately sold me completely on the term "Woke Right" not just as accurate and good but as genius. H/t (clip and argument) Entropyrian, who is a great follow.

Jordan Peterson explained the Woke Right ("Alt Right") back in 2018. It's not new, but two things are. 1) It's making a concerted bid for power in mainstream conservative spaces now and significantly succeed after years of infiltration 2) We know what makes them "Alt" is Woke. There's an interesting additional point here that's very important. Peterson is talking about how the Left tried to label him "Alt Right" as a polarizing smear. The Woke Left could do that because it can draw a distinction between itself and the reaction it created so long as there's distinction in the names. They could make it seem like there was a sprawling Alt Right that's really evil and scary and only the Woke Left can resist it. Peterson was having to defy this at considerable effort, and much of the Left didn't buy it anyway. This is the dialectic. The term "Woke Right" throws a monkey wrench into this dialectical program and breaks the machine. The (Woke) Left can post up and do the dialectic against any name for it except "Woke Right." The reason is that the term "Woke Right" is derivative to Woke, so you cannot think of the Woke Right without also thinking of the Woke Left, which is the referent. What makes the Woke Right bad is being almost just like the Woke Left. "Woke," not Left or Right, becomes the problem, short-circuiting the dialectic and neutering the Left on this dimension of their united front tactics. It therefore puts the problem squarely where it belongs: on Woke. This frees people up to consider Left and Right (better: liberal and conservative) outside of the polarizing game of radical extremes. It was this factor that ultimately sold me completely on the term "Woke Right" not just as accurate and good but as genius. H/t (clip and argument) Entropyrian, who is a great follow.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

47,160 次观看 • 1 年前

Regulating AI matters. On either side of the table, the question is no longer whether it happens. It is who gets to say they did it first. "I think it's totally possible Trump regulates AI too." "There is a world where the advisors really internalize that OpenAI and Anthropic are being genuine, and they start to get scared. That's one possibility. And then there is another possibility where something really bad actually happens during his term and it forces his hand. I think these are both possible." "I would actually bet that we see AI regulation during Trump's term. I think it's more likely than not." "They are going to make a preliminary framework to begin the regulated process of AI. It's like a trade deal. This is our first framework, and then they'll refine it afterward. But that way, come election time, they'll be like, we regulated AI. We are the first ones to do it."

Regulating AI matters. On either side of the table, the question is no longer whether it happens. It is who gets to say they did it first. "I think it's totally possible Trump regulates AI too." "There is a world where the advisors really internalize that OpenAI and Anthropic are being genuine, and they start to get scared. That's one possibility. And then there is another possibility where something really bad actually happens during his term and it forces his hand. I think these are both possible." "I would actually bet that we see AI regulation during Trump's term. I think it's more likely than not." "They are going to make a preliminary framework to begin the regulated process of AI. It's like a trade deal. This is our first framework, and then they'll refine it afterward. But that way, come election time, they'll be like, we regulated AI. We are the first ones to do it."

SemiAnalysis

23,465 次观看 • 10 天前

KATSEYE on ‘PINKY UP’ during a fan Q&A: “Everything doesn’t have to be too polished – I think that was the point of ‘PINKY UP.’ ‘Put your pinky up’ is very posh, but we wanted to add a modern and relaxed twist to it where it's not that deep. We can mess it up a little bit. That's the direction we're headed.”

KATSEYE on ‘PINKY UP’ during a fan Q&A: “Everything doesn’t have to be too polished – I think that was the point of ‘PINKY UP.’ ‘Put your pinky up’ is very posh, but we wanted to add a modern and relaxed twist to it where it's not that deep. We can mess it up a little bit. That's the direction we're headed.”

Pop Base

401,332 次观看 • 4 个月前

Epstein Survivor Dani Bensky on Blanche Meeting: It wasn't substantive. It was not productive. It just felt like, okay, well, we have we have a half hour air to grievances. Great. I met with survivors. It's like, that's not what we're asking for. We're asking for investigations. We have been like, it's so exhausting to keep saying the same things. Like America doesn't want to hear the same things over and over again. We just want action and we're not getting any action. And it's just after a day where you feel like maybe there's a small glimmer of hope. And now we've ticked the box and we're moving on.

Epstein Survivor Dani Bensky on Blanche Meeting: It wasn't substantive. It was not productive. It just felt like, okay, well, we have we have a half hour air to grievances. Great. I met with survivors. It's like, that's not what we're asking for. We're asking for investigations. We have been like, it's so exhausting to keep saying the same things. Like America doesn't want to hear the same things over and over again. We just want action and we're not getting any action. And it's just after a day where you feel like maybe there's a small glimmer of hope. And now we've ticked the box and we're moving on.

Acyn

52,396 次观看 • 2 个月前

Buttigieg: And my word of warning to my own political party is that we would make a terrible mistake if we thought that our job was to just take power somehow and then put everything back the way it was. That’s not what we’re here to do. We’re not out to go around and just find all the little bits and pieces of everything that they smashed and tape it together and say, “Here you go, I give you the world as it looked in 2023.” That’s not going to work. It’s not what we need. So much has changed, and the truth is they are destroying things right and left. They’re destroying a lot of good, important things. They’re destroying some useless things too, because they’re destroying everything. So now we get a chance to put things together on different terms.

Buttigieg: And my word of warning to my own political party is that we would make a terrible mistake if we thought that our job was to just take power somehow and then put everything back the way it was. That’s not what we’re here to do. We’re not out to go around and just find all the little bits and pieces of everything that they smashed and tape it together and say, “Here you go, I give you the world as it looked in 2023.” That’s not going to work. It’s not what we need. So much has changed, and the truth is they are destroying things right and left. They’re destroying a lot of good, important things. They’re destroying some useless things too, because they’re destroying everything. So now we get a chance to put things together on different terms.

Acyn

631,264 次观看 • 5 个月前

Hunt: So, who’s right on data centers? President Trump or Governor Shapiro? Fetterman: Oh, the president is actually right overall. I mean, you know, uh, we we used to be moving forward on data centers and now, I mean, he's actually scared by the polls. So I mean, what really what's really motivated by more than just the polls overall, you know, I set out I set up my message on it on data centers just a couple days on X where I'm saying it's, you know, the president happens to be right in this. You know, I think it's it's very necessary that we win the war on AI. Uh, we, I think it's necessary because AI is going to transform our world. And, you know, it can be either us be the leaders or it can be the Chinese. And we could we could live under those rules and they're going to build unlimited data centers. And they're not really, uh, really stopped by with the kind of like democracy and the kinds of rules that, that we have overall, I think it's important. And I would remind people, like a lot of the opposition is, is been driven by the ccp and a lot of a lot of influence. So I think now withwith data centers, uh, also there's the facts now that it, it consumes a very, very, maybe one tenth of 1%, you know, compared to almonds and compared to other other things, part of our economy and also our land usage as well, too. Pennsylvania, you know, we are energy rich, we are water rich. And we have we're land rich now. So I think it's an important part of our economy, not just for Pennsylvania's but also the country right now.

Hunt: So, who’s right on data centers? President Trump or Governor Shapiro? Fetterman: Oh, the president is actually right overall. I mean, you know, uh, we we used to be moving forward on data centers and now, I mean, he's actually scared by the polls. So I mean, what really what's really motivated by more than just the polls overall, you know, I set out I set up my message on it on data centers just a couple days on X where I'm saying it's, you know, the president happens to be right in this. You know, I think it's it's very necessary that we win the war on AI. Uh, we, I think it's necessary because AI is going to transform our world. And, you know, it can be either us be the leaders or it can be the Chinese. And we could we could live under those rules and they're going to build unlimited data centers. And they're not really, uh, really stopped by with the kind of like democracy and the kinds of rules that, that we have overall, I think it's important. And I would remind people, like a lot of the opposition is, is been driven by the ccp and a lot of a lot of influence. So I think now withwith data centers, uh, also there's the facts now that it, it consumes a very, very, maybe one tenth of 1%, you know, compared to almonds and compared to other other things, part of our economy and also our land usage as well, too. Pennsylvania, you know, we are energy rich, we are water rich. And we have we're land rich now. So I think it's an important part of our economy, not just for Pennsylvania's but also the country right now.

Acyn

204,594 次观看 • 25 天前

"To even it call it 'woke 1' is to concede the terms. Because we're in the midst of a 'woke scare,' like a red scare. And it's aim is to discipline us vis-a-vis certain issues. So we have to reject that language." - Eddie S. Glaude Jr. VIDEO PREMIERE NOW‼️:

"To even it call it 'woke 1' is to concede the terms. Because we're in the midst of a 'woke scare,' like a red scare. And it's aim is to discipline us vis-a-vis certain issues. So we have to reject that language." - Eddie S. Glaude Jr. VIDEO PREMIERE NOW‼️:

Briahna Joy Gray

32,084 次观看 • 1 个月前

🎙️ Kon Knueppel: "It's hard when we're not whole." "It's really hard to see where we're at and it's tough because guys have to embrace roles that are maybe different than in the preseason. That's frustrating, and losing is frustrating, but we'll keep at it."

🎙️ Kon Knueppel: "It's hard when we're not whole." "It's really hard to see where we're at and it's tough because guys have to embrace roles that are maybe different than in the preseason. That's frustrating, and losing is frustrating, but we'll keep at it."

r/CharlotteHornets

138,113 次观看 • 10 个月前

✨ hasanabi: "None of it makes sense. Are we too woke and we want to 'transmogrify' the children, or are we too conservative but it's also bad? It's like 'brown' conservatism, not white conservatism, which is good."

✨ hasanabi: "None of it makes sense. Are we too woke and we want to 'transmogrify' the children, or are we too conservative but it's also bad? It's like 'brown' conservatism, not white conservatism, which is good."

adri ♡

19,698 次观看 • 1 个月前

Greg Brockman on AGI arriving quietly and unevenly: "I think that AGI has turned out to be less of a point in time and more of this sort of fuzzy spectrum. And for me, Astra has really hit something that I'm like, 'Okay, I think this is pretty reasonable to call it AGI.'" "With its computer use capabilities, you really can ask it to do long-lived tasks, and it'll just do it. We've seen it run coherently for 24 hours to go accomplish tasks that I think are quite amazing and across a wide variety of domains." "It still is jagged... It's the first time it's not slop writing. But it's not great writing. There are a number of areas where I feel like we just need to polish it a little bit, and it would be fantastic. It's just not quite there." "What people are finding is that it is so capable across such a wide variety of tasks, that it is accelerative, it is empowering, and it's something that I think we've never really seen a model that's been a jump like this." Greg Brockman

Greg Brockman on AGI arriving quietly and unevenly: "I think that AGI has turned out to be less of a point in time and more of this sort of fuzzy spectrum. And for me, Astra has really hit something that I'm like, 'Okay, I think this is pretty reasonable to call it AGI.'" "With its computer use capabilities, you really can ask it to do long-lived tasks, and it'll just do it. We've seen it run coherently for 24 hours to go accomplish tasks that I think are quite amazing and across a wide variety of domains." "It still is jagged... It's the first time it's not slop writing. But it's not great writing. There are a number of areas where I feel like we just need to polish it a little bit, and it would be fantastic. It's just not quite there." "What people are finding is that it is so capable across such a wide variety of tasks, that it is accelerative, it is empowering, and it's something that I think we've never really seen a model that's been a jump like this." Greg Brockman

a16z

62,514 次观看 • 13 天前

They say everything is bigger in Texas. But is the Rangers’ 24-inch ballpark burrito too much? 🌯 “So, I have questions. I mean, in an effort to be the best, are they making something that is for everybody in the stadium?” Mike Golic “It's just doing too much. I'm happy with like chicken tendies and fries…It just seems like we're showboating a little bit here and we should get back to basics.” Jessie Coffield

They say everything is bigger in Texas. But is the Rangers’ 24-inch ballpark burrito too much? 🌯 “So, I have questions. I mean, in an effort to be the best, are they making something that is for everybody in the stadium?” Mike Golic “It's just doing too much. I'm happy with like chicken tendies and fries…It just seems like we're showboating a little bit here and we should get back to basics.” Jessie Coffield

GoJo and Golic

11,324 次观看 • 1 年前

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

David Senra

12,759 次观看 • 4 个月前

Trump: This ballroom is going to be something that's so beautiful for the city. The military wanted it more than anybody. It was supposed to be secret, but it became unsecret because of people that are really unpatriotic, saying things. We're building a triumphal arc, which will be incredible for the city. Incredible. We're fixing up the what was the Kennedy center? I was honored when the board changed the name a little bit. Actually. It shows that the Republican and the Democrats, they worked together.

Trump: This ballroom is going to be something that's so beautiful for the city. The military wanted it more than anybody. It was supposed to be secret, but it became unsecret because of people that are really unpatriotic, saying things. We're building a triumphal arc, which will be incredible for the city. Incredible. We're fixing up the what was the Kennedy center? I was honored when the board changed the name a little bit. Actually. It shows that the Republican and the Democrats, they worked together.

Acyn

136,906 次观看 • 6 个月前