正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just shared Covid stats so alarming they could make even the staunchest vaccine defender think twice. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the... vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” Dr Aseem Malhotrashow more

Children’s Health Defense

327,101 subscribers

131,222 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just dropped Covid stats that should make anyone who still supports the Covid vaccines stop and think. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just dropped Covid stats that should make anyone who still supports the Covid vaccines stop and think. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)

MAHA Action

196,748 次观看 • 11 个月前

Critical COVID Vaccine Revelations from Dr. Aseem Malhotra on The Diary of a CEO In a revealing Diary of a CEO interview with Steven Bartlett, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposed data that should have halted the COVID vaccine rollout. A reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, published in Vaccine, found serious harm—hospitalization, disability, or life-changing events—at a rate of 1 in 800, surpassing the risk of COVID hospitalization during the deadliest strain, across all age groups. Historically, vaccines were withdrawn for less: the swine flu vaccine was suspended for Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 in 100,000, and the rotavirus vaccine for a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction. Yet, the COVID vaccine’s 1 in 800 harm rate—40% tied to clotting disorders like lung clots and heart attacks—was ignored. UK data from 2023 showed that for over-70s, 2,500 vaccinations were needed to prevent one COVID hospitalization during Omicron. For under-50s, the number reaches hundreds of thousands. With Delta, it was about 1 in 250 for over-70s, unadjusted for socioeconomic factors. Sourced from Health Canada and the FDA, this data questions the mandates and coercion behind the rollout. Dr. Malhotra calls this a serious issue, unfit for medical use. Transparency is urgent.

Critical COVID Vaccine Revelations from Dr. Aseem Malhotra on The Diary of a CEO In a revealing Diary of a CEO interview with Steven Bartlett, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposed data that should have halted the COVID vaccine rollout. A reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, published in Vaccine, found serious harm—hospitalization, disability, or life-changing events—at a rate of 1 in 800, surpassing the risk of COVID hospitalization during the deadliest strain, across all age groups. Historically, vaccines were withdrawn for less: the swine flu vaccine was suspended for Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 in 100,000, and the rotavirus vaccine for a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction. Yet, the COVID vaccine’s 1 in 800 harm rate—40% tied to clotting disorders like lung clots and heart attacks—was ignored. UK data from 2023 showed that for over-70s, 2,500 vaccinations were needed to prevent one COVID hospitalization during Omicron. For under-50s, the number reaches hundreds of thousands. With Delta, it was about 1 in 250 for over-70s, unadjusted for socioeconomic factors. Sourced from Health Canada and the FDA, this data questions the mandates and coercion behind the rollout. Dr. Malhotra calls this a serious issue, unfit for medical use. Transparency is urgent.

Camus

45,590 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines *INCREASE* your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines INCREASE your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan

KanekoaTheGreat

2,292,917 次观看 • 3 年前

Shocking Reanalysis of Pfizer & Moderna Trials Reveals Alarming Harm Rates A bombshell reanalysis of the original Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trials—published in Vaccine, a top-tier journal—has uncovered disturbing data that should have halted their rollout. Key findings: - 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals suffered serious harm (hospitalization, disability, or life-changing injury). - 40% of these harms were clotting-related (heart attacks, lung clots, etc.). - This harm rate exceeds known thresholds for vaccine withdrawal (e.g., swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1 in 100,000 Guillain-Barré cases). Context: - During the most lethal phase of COVID, the vaccines were more likely to hospitalize you than COVID itself (on average, across age groups). - Later UK data (2023) showed 2,500 over-70s needed vaccination to prevent one Omicron hospitalization—a shockingly poor benefit-risk ratio. - For under-50s? Hundreds of thousands of doses per prevented hospitalization. Quote from Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A 1 in 800 serious harm rate is unprecedented in medicine. Past vaccines were pulled for far less. This demands immediate scrutiny—and accountability." The question isn’t just ‘Did the vaccines work?’—but ‘At what cost?’

Shocking Reanalysis of Pfizer & Moderna Trials Reveals Alarming Harm Rates A bombshell reanalysis of the original Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trials—published in Vaccine, a top-tier journal—has uncovered disturbing data that should have halted their rollout. Key findings: - 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals suffered serious harm (hospitalization, disability, or life-changing injury). - 40% of these harms were clotting-related (heart attacks, lung clots, etc.). - This harm rate exceeds known thresholds for vaccine withdrawal (e.g., swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1 in 100,000 Guillain-Barré cases). Context: - During the most lethal phase of COVID, the vaccines were more likely to hospitalize you than COVID itself (on average, across age groups). - Later UK data (2023) showed 2,500 over-70s needed vaccination to prevent one Omicron hospitalization—a shockingly poor benefit-risk ratio. - For under-50s? Hundreds of thousands of doses per prevented hospitalization. Quote from Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A 1 in 800 serious harm rate is unprecedented in medicine. Past vaccines were pulled for far less. This demands immediate scrutiny—and accountability." The question isn’t just ‘Did the vaccines work?’—but ‘At what cost?’

Camus

24,028 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Reanalysis Shows COVID Vaccine 2-4x More Likely to Cause Serious Harm Than COVID was to Hospitalize You Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra highlights a critical independent reanalysis of the original Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in the journal Vaccine in 2022 by a team including BMJ's Peter Doshi. The findings are staggering and call into question the very core of the global vaccine mandate policy. The data shows an individual was 2 to 4 times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event (resulting in disability, a life-changing incident, or hospitalization) from the COVID mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID itself. This isn't a fringe theory; this is the re-examined data from the trials that led to approval. This pivotal research is now influencing high-level policy, cited by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within HHS to argue against further investment in this technology. Dr. Malhotra posits a sobering conclusion: had this data been subjected to truly independent scrutiny from the start—without the commercial influence that biases regulators like the MHRA (which receives 86% of its funding from pharma)—these vaccines may never have been approved for a single human being. The evidence suggests they caused more harm than good. This truth, now known by insiders at HHS and the White House, must be acknowledged publicly. It is a necessary step toward restoring integrity to medicine and public health.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Reanalysis Shows COVID Vaccine 2-4x More Likely to Cause Serious Harm Than COVID was to Hospitalize You Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra highlights a critical independent reanalysis of the original Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in the journal Vaccine in 2022 by a team including BMJ's Peter Doshi. The findings are staggering and call into question the very core of the global vaccine mandate policy. The data shows an individual was 2 to 4 times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event (resulting in disability, a life-changing incident, or hospitalization) from the COVID mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID itself. This isn't a fringe theory; this is the re-examined data from the trials that led to approval. This pivotal research is now influencing high-level policy, cited by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within HHS to argue against further investment in this technology. Dr. Malhotra posits a sobering conclusion: had this data been subjected to truly independent scrutiny from the start—without the commercial influence that biases regulators like the MHRA (which receives 86% of its funding from pharma)—these vaccines may never have been approved for a single human being. The evidence suggests they caused more harm than good. This truth, now known by insiders at HHS and the White House, must be acknowledged publicly. It is a necessary step toward restoring integrity to medicine and public health.

Camus

46,957 次观看 • 11 个月前

Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials in the journal Vaccine reveals an unconscionable truth. You were 2-4x more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. The data was there from the beginning. This gene therapy never should have been injected into a single human arm."

Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials in the journal Vaccine reveals an unconscionable truth. You were 2-4x more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. The data was there from the beginning. This gene therapy never should have been injected into a single human arm."

Camus

77,375 次观看 • 11 个月前

The "modern age of medicine" with mRNA technology. Dr. John Campbell: "One in 35 of people who received the booster had vaccine associated myocardial injury". FDA Commissioner Dr. Makary: "We know there's a risk of Myocarditis in young healthy men that's 1/2600". The number needed to vaccinate to prevent 1 Hospitalization in young people - 113,700. So, if 113,700 young people have "boosters", to prevent ONE hospitalization, that's 3,248 "vaccine associated myocardial" injuries, and 44 cases of Myocarditis. Dr Marty Makary: "25% of clinicians know of somebody that's been significantly disabled or died from a vaccine". Dr. John Campbell calls this rate of adverse event "off the scale"

The "modern age of medicine" with mRNA technology. Dr. John Campbell: "One in 35 of people who received the booster had vaccine associated myocardial injury". FDA Commissioner Dr. Makary: "We know there's a risk of Myocarditis in young healthy men that's 1/2600". The number needed to vaccinate to prevent 1 Hospitalization in young people - 113,700. So, if 113,700 young people have "boosters", to prevent ONE hospitalization, that's 3,248 "vaccine associated myocardial" injuries, and 44 cases of Myocarditis. Dr Marty Makary: "25% of clinicians know of somebody that's been significantly disabled or died from a vaccine". Dr. John Campbell calls this rate of adverse event "off the scale"

Humanspective

27,479 次观看 • 8 个月前

113,700 young people need a covid mRNA injection to prevent ONE hospitalization Dr Marty Makary says that's 44 cases of Myocarditis to prevent one hospitalization Dr Campbell mentions the below study where 1/35 people had "vaccine associated myocardial injury" for boosters. If 113,700 people have "boosters", to prevent ONE hospitalization, that's 3,248 "vaccine associated myocardial" injuries according to the published study Dr Campbell refers to. So for young people, to prevent 1 Hospitalisation, that's 44 cases of Myocarditis and 3,248 cases of "vaccine associated myocardial" injuries. FDA Commissioner Dr Marty Makary: ◻️"25% of clinicians know of somebody that's been significantly disabled or died from a vaccine" ◻️"I know of three people who have died from the Covid vaccine" ◻️"there's a risk of myocarditis in young healthy men that's 1 in 2600 young boys. Dr John Campbell ◻️"one in 35 of people who received the booster had vaccine associated myocardial injury" Dr Campbell says this rate of adverse events is "off the scale".

113,700 young people need a covid mRNA injection to prevent ONE hospitalization Dr Marty Makary says that's 44 cases of Myocarditis to prevent one hospitalization Dr Campbell mentions the below study where 1/35 people had "vaccine associated myocardial injury" for boosters. If 113,700 people have "boosters", to prevent ONE hospitalization, that's 3,248 "vaccine associated myocardial" injuries according to the published study Dr Campbell refers to. So for young people, to prevent 1 Hospitalisation, that's 44 cases of Myocarditis and 3,248 cases of "vaccine associated myocardial" injuries. FDA Commissioner Dr Marty Makary: ◻️"25% of clinicians know of somebody that's been significantly disabled or died from a vaccine" ◻️"I know of three people who have died from the Covid vaccine" ◻️"there's a risk of myocarditis in young healthy men that's 1 in 2600 young boys. Dr John Campbell ◻️"one in 35 of people who received the booster had vaccine associated myocardial injury" Dr Campbell says this rate of adverse events is "off the scale".

Humanspective

31,389 次观看 • 10 个月前

New Analysis: 2-4x Greater Risk of Serious Harm from mRNA Vaccine Than COVID Hospitalization A bombshell re-examination of the original Pfizer and Moderna trial data has reached a conclusion that demands urgent public attention. According to renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an independent study published in Vaccine (2022) found a staggering inverse risk-benefit profile. The analysis, led by experts including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, revealed that during the trials, an individual was two to four times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event—defined as disability, life-changing injury, or hospitalization—from the mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID-19. This critical research is now central to the argument that the vaccines may have caused more net harm than good. Dr. Malhotra suggests that had this independent analysis been possible before emergency authorization—without the influence of industry-funded regulators—the vaccines may not have been approved for a single person. This data is no longer just a scientific discussion; it is actively shaping policy, informing recent actions by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within the U.S. HHS. It points to a catastrophic failure in the risk-benefit analysis that underpinned global mandates. The imperative now is a full, transparent, and independent review of all data. The public health establishment must be held accountable for decisions made on flawed premises.

Camus

22,222 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨BREAKING: DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines Cancer Genomics Expert, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, testified to the South Carolina Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines. Dr. Buckhaults and his team are the inventors of the COVID-19 spit test that was used nationally during the pandemic. Some quotes from the clip: "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA." "It could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest." "It could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer.." "There's probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine.."

🚨BREAKING: DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines Cancer Genomics Expert, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, testified to the South Carolina Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines. Dr. Buckhaults and his team are the inventors of the COVID-19 spit test that was used nationally during the pandemic. Some quotes from the clip: "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA." "It could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest." "It could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer.." "There's probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine.."

Freedom On Fire

516,799 次观看 • 2 年前

Dr. John Campbell told Jimmy Dore there’s already been enough data to justify removing the Covid vaccine from circulation. “The risk-benefit analysis from the vaccine was never favorable in my view.” “Basically, about 1 in 800 people were getting serious adverse events.” “This is more than enough to have the vaccine withdrawn — more than enough — and yet people persisted with it.” “You know the saying, when you’re in a hole, stop digging” “But they just kept on digging.” “People, of course, don’t want to admit that they got things wrong.” Jimmy Dore

Dr. John Campbell told Jimmy Dore there’s already been enough data to justify removing the Covid vaccine from circulation. “The risk-benefit analysis from the vaccine was never favorable in my view.” “Basically, about 1 in 800 people were getting serious adverse events.” “This is more than enough to have the vaccine withdrawn — more than enough — and yet people persisted with it.” “You know the saying, when you’re in a hole, stop digging” “But they just kept on digging.” “People, of course, don’t want to admit that they got things wrong.” Jimmy Dore

Children’s Health Defense

51,824 次观看 • 10 个月前

It is NOT just the COVID vaccine. It’s ALL the vaccines. October is Vaccine Injury Awareness Month, + while the COVID shot is incredibly dangerous, it’s just one of the many vaccines that cause immense harm + even death. This month, remember that vaccine manufacturer liability was waived long before the COVID shot, + any vaccine can result in a serious adverse event.

It is NOT just the COVID vaccine. It’s ALL the vaccines. October is Vaccine Injury Awareness Month, + while the COVID shot is incredibly dangerous, it’s just one of the many vaccines that cause immense harm + even death. This month, remember that vaccine manufacturer liability was waived long before the COVID shot, + any vaccine can result in a serious adverse event.

Reform Pharma

55,604 次观看 • 1 年前

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."

Sense Receptor

130,653 次观看 • 11 个月前

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,203,412 次观看 • 3 年前

'We have the most overwhelming evidence you can have to talk about the link between vaccines and cardiac problems.' Dr Aseem Malhotra talks about a study that found people were more likely to get serious adverse event from the Covid-19 vaccine than to be hospitalised with Covid.

'We have the most overwhelming evidence you can have to talk about the link between vaccines and cardiac problems.' Dr Aseem Malhotra talks about a study that found people were more likely to get serious adverse event from the Covid-19 vaccine than to be hospitalised with Covid.

GB News

336,460 次观看 • 3 年前

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: “No One Should Have Ever Received a Single COVID Shot” Dr. Aseem Malhotra is sounding the alarm on what he calls one of the most consequential medical deceptions of our time. Citing a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s own trial data, published in Vaccine by independent scientists including BMJ associate editor Dr. Peter Doshi, the findings reveal a stunning reality: participants were up to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. Malhotra argues this data shows the mRNA injections were misrepresented from day one — products better described as gene therapy than as vaccines. “If this analysis is even close to accurate,” he warns, “then not a single person should have ever been injected.” A momentous statement — and one that demands the world’s attention.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: “No One Should Have Ever Received a Single COVID Shot” Dr. Aseem Malhotra is sounding the alarm on what he calls one of the most consequential medical deceptions of our time. Citing a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s own trial data, published in Vaccine by independent scientists including BMJ associate editor Dr. Peter Doshi, the findings reveal a stunning reality: participants were up to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. Malhotra argues this data shows the mRNA injections were misrepresented from day one — products better described as gene therapy than as vaccines. “If this analysis is even close to accurate,” he warns, “then not a single person should have ever been injected.” A momentous statement — and one that demands the world’s attention.

Camus

83,318 次观看 • 9 个月前