Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Dr. Bandy Lee on Trump's interaction with Xi Jinping: He will continue to be played by these leaders. He is extremely manipulable. The flip side of individuals with mental impairments like his is that he not only manipulates and exploits and abuses individuals who are inferior to him, but... show more

MeidasTouch

1,346,474 subscribers

36,200 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Comments

MeidasTouch5 days ago

Watch the full episode:

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸5 days ago

🔥 Bandy had Trump figured out a long time ago. Thanks for having her on.

𝙽𝚘𝙻𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛 𝐒ꛎ𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜5 days ago

We can tell who he believes is Superior by the welcome . Putin & Xi get red carpets

StampedBills5 days ago

Strongman talk. Easy to roll. Stamp It. Track It. Resist.

Colin Jarvis✊🏿🇬🇾🇬🇧5 days ago

potus rump has a v sick🧠/ sick thought process / sick mental rational. always has always will to the day he⚰️! hasnt prevented him from achieving his goals in life. just the opposite. rump cld not care less abt🇺🇸 and the american ppl. i mean, why wld he?

KJofTikTok5 days ago

Want to burn brain cells, listen to this retard. No, not the chick, but the brain dead, detached-from-reality MF'er on the left.

Related Videos

Epstein victims' attorney Kuvin: Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t Jeffrey Epstein in a vacuum. His conspiracy of utilizing young girls for sexual conduct involved not just him, but many other individuals—individuals who were given young girls, individuals he was trying to gather evidence against so he could curry favor and potentially blackmail them. Some of those people are still out there. They remain unnamed and unidentified. The federal government knows who they are, but they’re refusing to disclose those names. That is the information the public needs to know, and the public deserves to judge for themselves why someone may have been, for example, at Epstein’s home with a bunch of topless underage girls—or at his island, similarly surrounded by topless underage girls. Those people should be outed. They should be identified. And people like you, and the rest of the press, should be asking them questions.

Epstein victims' attorney Kuvin: Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t Jeffrey Epstein in a vacuum. His conspiracy of utilizing young girls for sexual conduct involved not just him, but many other individuals—individuals who were given young girls, individuals he was trying to gather evidence against so he could curry favor and potentially blackmail them. Some of those people are still out there. They remain unnamed and unidentified. The federal government knows who they are, but they’re refusing to disclose those names. That is the information the public needs to know, and the public deserves to judge for themselves why someone may have been, for example, at Epstein’s home with a bunch of topless underage girls—or at his island, similarly surrounded by topless underage girls. Those people should be outed. They should be identified. And people like you, and the rest of the press, should be asking them questions.

MeidasTouch

98,675 views • 1 year ago

In his diary session, he spoke about not knowing if he has done enough or if he is deserving, saying that “deserving” feels like such a big word because he came into the house simply to have fun. He hopes to stay until the final week, but if this happens to be his last diary session, he is more than grateful and knows he is not entitled to any outcome. He believes that what is his will be his and that whatever is meant to be will be. He said he wouldn’t be disappointed if he leaves today; instead, he would be proud of himself for making it this far, being part of the biggest show and having a great run. Most importantly, he came as himself, is happy with his journey and would leave with peace of mind. His highlights this week were the Travel Beta task yesterday and winning a task last week with some of his favourite people. He ended by thanking Big Brother for providing him with a barber 🎥: Big Brother Naija #Tram #BBNaija

In his diary session, he spoke about not knowing if he has done enough or if he is deserving, saying that “deserving” feels like such a big word because he came into the house simply to have fun. He hopes to stay until the final week, but if this happens to be his last diary session, he is more than grateful and knows he is not entitled to any outcome. He believes that what is his will be his and that whatever is meant to be will be. He said he wouldn’t be disappointed if he leaves today; instead, he would be proud of himself for making it this far, being part of the biggest show and having a great run. Most importantly, he came as himself, is happy with his journey and would leave with peace of mind. His highlights this week were the Travel Beta task yesterday and winning a task last week with some of his favourite people. He ended by thanking Big Brother for providing him with a barber 🎥: Big Brother Naija #Tram #BBNaija

TRAM

17,552 views • 6 days ago

We are extremely sad to report the loss of Pether’s Moon. He was a true gentleman and a firm yard favourite. Pether’s will be sorely missed by all of the Yorton team and by everyone who had the pleasure of being involved with him. He will live on in his wonderful stock.

We are extremely sad to report the loss of Pether’s Moon. He was a true gentleman and a firm yard favourite. Pether’s will be sorely missed by all of the Yorton team and by everyone who had the pleasure of being involved with him. He will live on in his wonderful stock.

Yorton Farm Stud

23,796 views • 1 year ago

This man is pestering a couple who are playing with their dogs on an open lot of grass next to his home. He is pretty arrogant and even claims to know the chief of police. What made him so angry, and does he have a point that they should not be there? He seems to be the only one who is bothered.

This man is pestering a couple who are playing with their dogs on an open lot of grass next to his home. He is pretty arrogant and even claims to know the chief of police. What made him so angry, and does he have a point that they should not be there? He seems to be the only one who is bothered.

Suzee Q

72,826 views • 6 months ago

Remember when Woozi ALWAYS says that he doesn't have greed and he once wrote about his thoughts on love, fame, and money, about his fear of being consumed by greed, of losing himself, and falling into despair and helplessness which could make him forget who SEVENTEEN really are, who he is, and the color they have. He always reminds himself that he is here because of the members and CARATs. All this is purely to keep his inner alarm ringing, so he remembers what he was like when he first started, and so he doesn't change his form even when he is at the top. That’s how humble SEVENTEEN are, they don’t get swept away, and they’re not easily tempted by popularity.

Remember when Woozi ALWAYS says that he doesn't have greed and he once wrote about his thoughts on love, fame, and money, about his fear of being consumed by greed, of losing himself, and falling into despair and helplessness which could make him forget who SEVENTEEN really are, who he is, and the color they have. He always reminds himself that he is here because of the members and CARATs. All this is purely to keep his inner alarm ringing, so he remembers what he was like when he first started, and so he doesn't change his form even when he is at the top. That’s how humble SEVENTEEN are, they don’t get swept away, and they’re not easily tempted by popularity.

nasi.

58,985 views • 5 months ago

Daemon Targaryen is one of the most complex and captivating characters in the history of House Targaryen. Feared as the Rogue Prince, he was a brilliant warrior, a fearless dragonrider, and a man who refused to be bound by convention. Impulsive, ruthless, and fiercely ambitious, Daemon often walked the line between hero and villain, making him as unpredictable to his allies as he was to his enemies. Yet beneath his arrogance and recklessness lay an unwavering loyalty to his family and the Targaryen legacy. What makes Daemon unforgettable is that he was never simply good or evil-he was both. He could be ruthless in battle and deeply devoted to those he loved, driven as much by emotion as by ambition. During the Dance of the Dragons, he became the Blacks' greatest military commander, proving that his legacy would be defined not only by the wars he fought, but by the fearless way he lived. The Rogue Prince was never meant to be ordinary, and that is exactly why history remembers him. #daemon #daemontargaryen #houseofthedragon...

Daemon Targaryen is one of the most complex and captivating characters in the history of House Targaryen. Feared as the Rogue Prince, he was a brilliant warrior, a fearless dragonrider, and a man who refused to be bound by convention. Impulsive, ruthless, and fiercely ambitious, Daemon often walked the line between hero and villain, making him as unpredictable to his allies as he was to his enemies. Yet beneath his arrogance and recklessness lay an unwavering loyalty to his family and the Targaryen legacy. What makes Daemon unforgettable is that he was never simply good or evil-he was both. He could be ruthless in battle and deeply devoted to those he loved, driven as much by emotion as by ambition. During the Dance of the Dragons, he became the Blacks' greatest military commander, proving that his legacy would be defined not only by the wars he fought, but by the fearless way he lived. The Rogue Prince was never meant to be ordinary, and that is exactly why history remembers him. #daemon #daemontargaryen #houseofthedragon...

Xerxes

160,060 views • 1 month ago

Winnie Odinga: I think Dr Oburu Oginga is a wonderful acting party leader in this transition period and he is steadying the ship. This is not a very easy ship to steady, but he is weathering the storm and he has said many times that he is acting transitionally and will make space for other young people. My uncle has lived a life of determination, strength and loyalty. Winnie Odinga would be the last person that at his age of 82, would allow his legacy to be besmirched by a political tug of war. We are very happy with him being in the position that he is; he is certainly the best person in that position #CitizenExplainer

Winnie Odinga: I think Dr Oburu Oginga is a wonderful acting party leader in this transition period and he is steadying the ship. This is not a very easy ship to steady, but he is weathering the storm and he has said many times that he is acting transitionally and will make space for other young people. My uncle has lived a life of determination, strength and loyalty. Winnie Odinga would be the last person that at his age of 82, would allow his legacy to be besmirched by a political tug of war. We are very happy with him being in the position that he is; he is certainly the best person in that position #CitizenExplainer

Citizen TV Kenya

20,516 views • 8 months ago

How will the world take #Africa seriously with leaders like Paul Kagame? He is the antagonist to any values of democracy that he pretends to uphold. Always self promoting with no interest of the people he is supposed to protect: Rwandans and Africans. As a citizen #Rwanda and African who have experienced first hand the leadership of Paul Kagame, I'm really frustrated to see him act like he's some kind of expert on good governance. He is a leader who purposefully makes his population poor! He is a leader who insults his neighboring counterparts! He is a leader holding onto power through fear and force after being in charge for over 30 years! He is a leader who plays the blame game when it suits him, never at fault, and always right; spending thousands of dollars to have his image cleaned by PR machines around the world! Africa will not prosper under these types of leaders. #KagameMustGo #WeAreNotTogether

How will the world take #Africa seriously with leaders like Paul Kagame? He is the antagonist to any values of democracy that he pretends to uphold. Always self promoting with no interest of the people he is supposed to protect: Rwandans and Africans. As a citizen #Rwanda and African who have experienced first hand the leadership of Paul Kagame, I'm really frustrated to see him act like he's some kind of expert on good governance. He is a leader who purposefully makes his population poor! He is a leader who insults his neighboring counterparts! He is a leader holding onto power through fear and force after being in charge for over 30 years! He is a leader who plays the blame game when it suits him, never at fault, and always right; spending thousands of dollars to have his image cleaned by PR machines around the world! Africa will not prosper under these types of leaders. #KagameMustGo #WeAreNotTogether

Eric Ngoga

17,460 views • 1 year ago

Rick Wilson: Trump administration isn’t treating Russia as an adversary because Trump has mental defect in how he views Russia. He believes Putin is his friend, that Putin loves and admires him, and Trump reciprocates that. Putin looks at Trump as a fool and a sucker. Putin is an old intelligence officer who sees Trump as someone he can manipulate. Trump believes that Putin is his friend, that Russia is the future, and that Russia is an unconquerable power in the world. It is a persistent mystery to many Americans why this is, but it shouldn’t be. Trump is a textbook case of someone who is easily manipulated. And Putin has easily manipulated him for 10 years now.

Rick Wilson: Trump administration isn’t treating Russia as an adversary because Trump has mental defect in how he views Russia. He believes Putin is his friend, that Putin loves and admires him, and Trump reciprocates that. Putin looks at Trump as a fool and a sucker. Putin is an old intelligence officer who sees Trump as someone he can manipulate. Trump believes that Putin is his friend, that Russia is the future, and that Russia is an unconquerable power in the world. It is a persistent mystery to many Americans why this is, but it shouldn’t be. Trump is a textbook case of someone who is easily manipulated. And Putin has easily manipulated him for 10 years now.

Kate from Kharkiv

36,767 views • 29 days ago

I’ve heard countless tributes to Charlie Kirk, but this sermon from Pastor Rob McCoy stands out as the ultimate testament to the life Charlie lived and the mission God gave him. “I look at Charlie and his life as modern-day Moses.” I strongly urge everyone to watch this full message: "One man in God constitutes a majority, and that's what Charlie was. He understood that God was the majority and he operated in that context. And he continued forward even though it wasn't popular. You'd be with him at some of these campus events. It'd be Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of detractors." "He would just continue by the spoken word. He wasn't a violent man. He built turning point on nothing more than the spoken word, logic and reason, logos. And every day he was threatened by those who couldn't contend logically with the spoken word. And he would step forward without any fear because as the apostle Paul said, I have been crucified with Christ." "It's no longer I who live, it's Christ who lives in me. I is ego, self-preservation, Charlie had given his life to the Lord and it was in his hands and he was going to step forward courageously without fear. Because in the absence of courage, truth is an orphan. And Charlie was fearless, just like you are. And he knew every day with those threats that he was in danger, but his life belonged to God." "Like he would say, I'm immortal until God's done with me. And as he would step forward and contend, he would win hearts. And now it's not, Charlie in a sea of detractors. It was Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of red hats and people professing having come to Christ because of him sharing his faith."

I’ve heard countless tributes to Charlie Kirk, but this sermon from Pastor Rob McCoy stands out as the ultimate testament to the life Charlie lived and the mission God gave him. “I look at Charlie and his life as modern-day Moses.” I strongly urge everyone to watch this full message: "One man in God constitutes a majority, and that's what Charlie was. He understood that God was the majority and he operated in that context. And he continued forward even though it wasn't popular. You'd be with him at some of these campus events. It'd be Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of detractors." "He would just continue by the spoken word. He wasn't a violent man. He built turning point on nothing more than the spoken word, logic and reason, logos. And every day he was threatened by those who couldn't contend logically with the spoken word. And he would step forward without any fear because as the apostle Paul said, I have been crucified with Christ." "It's no longer I who live, it's Christ who lives in me. I is ego, self-preservation, Charlie had given his life to the Lord and it was in his hands and he was going to step forward courageously without fear. Because in the absence of courage, truth is an orphan. And Charlie was fearless, just like you are. And he knew every day with those threats that he was in danger, but his life belonged to God." "Like he would say, I'm immortal until God's done with me. And as he would step forward and contend, he would win hearts. And now it's not, Charlie in a sea of detractors. It was Charlie, a handful of us, and a sea of red hats and people professing having come to Christ because of him sharing his faith."

Benny Johnson

245,357 views • 1 year ago

BHEKI MTOLO 🔥🔥 When we remind Zuma that he is a liar we are not insulting him. We are telling him the truth Zuma thinks people of South Africa are stupid. He destroyed the ANC by dropping its vote which was increasing under Mbeki. But he now blames Ramaphosa for that. He is drunk. Show me one person who was a friend of Zuma in 2007 and who is still his friend today. He spits everyone. Who are we not not be spat by him! It's all about himself. He destroyed Cosatu, SACP, ANCYL, ANC. He is a wrecking ball. It is Ramaphosa who is introducing pro poor policies which Zuma rejected. Ramaphosa may not be a good singer and dancer, but he is more sympathic to the poor in deeds than Zuma. Zuma is just telling us that he is poor, but his actions show a selfish man. It is not a surprise why ANC loses votes in Nkandla. People there can't relate to him. They will now vote ANC since he has left ANC.

BHEKI MTOLO 🔥🔥 When we remind Zuma that he is a liar we are not insulting him. We are telling him the truth Zuma thinks people of South Africa are stupid. He destroyed the ANC by dropping its vote which was increasing under Mbeki. But he now blames Ramaphosa for that. He is drunk. Show me one person who was a friend of Zuma in 2007 and who is still his friend today. He spits everyone. Who are we not not be spat by him! It's all about himself. He destroyed Cosatu, SACP, ANCYL, ANC. He is a wrecking ball. It is Ramaphosa who is introducing pro poor policies which Zuma rejected. Ramaphosa may not be a good singer and dancer, but he is more sympathic to the poor in deeds than Zuma. Zuma is just telling us that he is poor, but his actions show a selfish man. It is not a surprise why ANC loses votes in Nkandla. People there can't relate to him. They will now vote ANC since he has left ANC.

Constitution First 🇿🇦

227,833 views • 2 years ago

“A man who chooses his own path and stands by his principles is not selfish… He is simply someone who refuses to live as a slave to anyone’s expectations. Those who shout ‘traitor’ — show us whom he actually betrayed. A man who never betrayed his truth can never be guilty simply because he refused to live by your expectations.” #Gladiators #AjithKumar

“A man who chooses his own path and stands by his principles is not selfish… He is simply someone who refuses to live as a slave to anyone’s expectations. Those who shout ‘traitor’ — show us whom he actually betrayed. A man who never betrayed his truth can never be guilty simply because he refused to live by your expectations.” #Gladiators #AjithKumar

🦂ɳ𝖎𝖛𝖆𝖘𝖍 🆎+

87,090 views • 22 days ago

Barry said he is kinda friends with everybody and doesn’t really have his person and like he is multiple people’s conversations and he feels like he is the 3rd wheel He said his most friends with Bluethopia and Neche and he needs 1 one person he could most rely on Biggie: and who would that be Barry: Neche Barry also said people say him and Neche are like very close but he said it’s kinda difficult have a conversation with her he doesn’t know if it’s fear (the fear of doing something wrong or the fear of getting attached) he doesn’t know how to go about it #BBNaija #BBNaijaS11

Barry said he is kinda friends with everybody and doesn’t really have his person and like he is multiple people’s conversations and he feels like he is the 3rd wheel He said his most friends with Bluethopia and Neche and he needs 1 one person he could most rely on Biggie: and who would that be Barry: Neche Barry also said people say him and Neche are like very close but he said it’s kinda difficult have a conversation with her he doesn’t know if it’s fear (the fear of doing something wrong or the fear of getting attached) he doesn’t know how to go about it #BBNaija #BBNaijaS11

𝐒𝐫 𝐅𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐫

31,628 views • 1 month ago

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

RadiantFilm

27,723 views • 8 months ago

Basil the Great Rupert Lowe is the only man who is going to addres these issues head on. He will not back down. He will not pander to people who hate the country. He will not be emotionally manipulated. He will do what needs to be done and that’s why he MUST win!

Basil the Great Rupert Lowe is the only man who is going to addres these issues head on. He will not back down. He will not pander to people who hate the country. He will not be emotionally manipulated. He will do what needs to be done and that’s why he MUST win!

J Stewart

67,731 views • 7 months ago

But Dhruv Rathi's Andhbhakt army will just blindly follow what he says as ‘facts’, that he asserts with his hand modelling skills. This is the very trap used by him which is not noticed by the viewers & his audience easily believes what he says.

But Dhruv Rathi's Andhbhakt army will just blindly follow what he says as ‘facts’, that he asserts with his hand modelling skills. This is the very trap used by him which is not noticed by the viewers & his audience easily believes what he says.

That Marine Guy🇮🇳

37,247 views • 8 months ago

Elon is talking about the reaction to his political work. He says he did what needed to be done, but faced what he calls a violent, antibody response. People damaged cars, threatened him, and went after his companies. He makes it clear he has never committed violence himself. His view is simple: those people are on the wrong side of history, and some of them are already going to prison. He says more will follow, including the ones who funded and organized it. He closes by looking at the camera and saying: “Don’t worry, we’re coming for you.”

Elon is talking about the reaction to his political work. He says he did what needed to be done, but faced what he calls a violent, antibody response. People damaged cars, threatened him, and went after his companies. He makes it clear he has never committed violence himself. His view is simple: those people are on the wrong side of history, and some of them are already going to prison. He says more will follow, including the ones who funded and organized it. He closes by looking at the camera and saying: “Don’t worry, we’re coming for you.”

Astro Greek

15,483 views • 1 month ago

One of the most remarkable speeches by Pope Benedict XVI, delivered at the German Bundestag. “Yet I would like to underline a point that seems to me to be neglected, today as in the past: there is also an ecology of man. Man too has a nature that he must respect and that he cannot manipulate at will. Man is not merely self-creating freedom. Man does not create himself. He is intellect and will, but he is also nature, and his will is rightly ordered if he respects his nature, listens to it and accepts himself for who he is, as one who did not create himself. In this way, and in no other, is true human freedom fulfilled.”—Pope Benedict XVI

One of the most remarkable speeches by Pope Benedict XVI, delivered at the German Bundestag. “Yet I would like to underline a point that seems to me to be neglected, today as in the past: there is also an ecology of man. Man too has a nature that he must respect and that he cannot manipulate at will. Man is not merely self-creating freedom. Man does not create himself. He is intellect and will, but he is also nature, and his will is rightly ordered if he respects his nature, listens to it and accepts himself for who he is, as one who did not create himself. In this way, and in no other, is true human freedom fulfilled.”—Pope Benedict XVI

Coworkeroftruth

80,617 views • 9 months ago

🇮🇱🇺🇸- WHAT YOU BELIEVE ABOUT ISRAEL MATTERS. ‼️Who you choose to listen to regarding Israel matters. TUCKER CARLSON VS DR. JOHN MACARTHUR Tucker Carlson “And of course, the whole point of Christianity is that that is no longer true, that there is no chosen people. Whatever this is, it's not Christianity, it is heresy.” John MacArthur “He would write His laws in their heart and they, they would be saved and He would be their King and they would be His people and all those kingdom prophecies. You can't possibly tell me that God didn't mean what He said.” Which side are you on? #Israel

🇮🇱🇺🇸- WHAT YOU BELIEVE ABOUT ISRAEL MATTERS. ‼️Who you choose to listen to regarding Israel matters. TUCKER CARLSON VS DR. JOHN MACARTHUR Tucker Carlson “And of course, the whole point of Christianity is that that is no longer true, that there is no chosen people. Whatever this is, it's not Christianity, it is heresy.” John MacArthur “He would write His laws in their heart and they, they would be saved and He would be their King and they would be His people and all those kingdom prophecies. You can't possibly tell me that God didn't mean what He said.” Which side are you on? #Israel

Pastor Travis Johnson

119,936 views • 9 months ago