Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Dr Cass appears to suggest that this 11-year-old should be given puberty blockers. A child whose parents reportedly decided he was a girl at the age of two and socially transitioned him. We are told that his social anxiety is now so severe that he rarely leaves his bedroom... or attends school, and that he has developed low bone density - before even being given puberty blockers. And the response from politicians is “hear, hear”, as though Dr Cass has just said something profound. To me, it sounds like one of the most extraordinary and troubling things I’ve ever heard a doctor say. Why is no one asking questions about the adults in this situation? How was a two-year-old boy allowed to be socially transitioned and raised as a girl? The outcome described is a child with such severe anxiety that he cannot attend school or participate in ordinary life, and who is already experiencing serious physical health problems. The question shouldn’t be whether this child needed puberty blockers. It should be how so many adults failed to protect him.show more

Janet Murray

40,076 subscribers

44,583 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

As a little boy he liked to wear dresses......So they put him on puberty blockers and told him he was a girl... Putting a child on puberty blockers should be an imprisonable offence...it's the worst kind of conversion therapy...

Sensitive content

As a little boy he liked to wear dresses......So they put him on puberty blockers and told him he was a girl... Putting a child on puberty blockers should be an imprisonable offence...it's the worst kind of conversion therapy...

Jonny Bell

61,352 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇬🇧 15 YEAR OLDS BANNED FROM SOCIAL MEDIA, 11 YEAR OLDS NOW CLEARED FOR PUBERTY BLOCKERS 15 year olds are not allowed to have social media because the government says so. 11 year old children are now permitted puberty blockers under a new NHS trial because the government says so. The same state that decides a teenager isn't mature enough for Instagram has decided a child barely out of primary school is mature enough to consent to hormone altering drugs. This is pure evil and we must fight to ensure it is overturned.

🇬🇧 15 YEAR OLDS BANNED FROM SOCIAL MEDIA, 11 YEAR OLDS NOW CLEARED FOR PUBERTY BLOCKERS 15 year olds are not allowed to have social media because the government says so. 11 year old children are now permitted puberty blockers under a new NHS trial because the government says so. The same state that decides a teenager isn't mature enough for Instagram has decided a child barely out of primary school is mature enough to consent to hormone altering drugs. This is pure evil and we must fight to ensure it is overturned.

British Intel

25,254 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is CRAZY. A teen boy on puberty blockers goes to a urologist because he was wetting his pants in class and the pee had blood in it. They go to doctor who says it has nothing to do with the puberty blockers. The trans friendly urologist says the boy is holding his pee in too long. A few months after stopping the puberty blockers, the boy stopped peeing blood. Imagine that. Here’s the kicker, that’s same urologist was charged this year for allegedly having thousands of inappropriate pictures of children.

This is CRAZY. A teen boy on puberty blockers goes to a urologist because he was wetting his pants in class and the pee had blood in it. They go to doctor who says it has nothing to do with the puberty blockers. The trans friendly urologist says the boy is holding his pee in too long. A few months after stopping the puberty blockers, the boy stopped peeing blood. Imagine that. Here’s the kicker, that’s same urologist was charged this year for allegedly having thousands of inappropriate pictures of children.

Derrick Evans

101,433 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Why did Amazeorg remove this 5-year-old video from their YouTube channel today when Bill Ackman brought attention to it on X? Is it be because, as Bill said, it acts as a "transgender recruitment cartoon" for kids feeling awkward about their bodies during puberty? Or is it because the scientific claims made about the effects of puberty blockers being "temporary" and reversible were never evidence based? I think we all deserve an explanation. TRANSCRIPT: A person who is transgender is someone whose internal sense of their gender—being a boy, girl, or something else—doesn't match their physical body. People who feel this way sometimes feel anxious when they begin to reach puberty and their body starts to change in ways that don't match their internal sense of their gender. These feelings are totally normal. If you feel you want more time to explore how you feel about your gender before your body starts to change, it's important to talk with a parent, counselor, therapist, or doctor about the feelings you have regarding your gender. After some discussion and counseling, you may be referred to an endocrinologist. Endocrinologists specialize in hormones, and they're the most likely to prescribe puberty blockers for someone who wants them. Puberty blockers are medications that will stop your body from changing. They're usually given as an injection or an implant. They block the production of hormones to stop or delay the physical changes of puberty. The effects of the medication are only temporary, so if a person stops using puberty blockers, the physical changes of puberty will begin again. Whether you identify as male, female, genderqueer, or something else, you're perfectly normal. And there are lots of ways to manage puberty so that it can be a fun, exciting time rather than a scary or stressful one.

Why did Amazeorg remove this 5-year-old video from their YouTube channel today when Bill Ackman brought attention to it on X? Is it be because, as Bill said, it acts as a "transgender recruitment cartoon" for kids feeling awkward about their bodies during puberty? Or is it because the scientific claims made about the effects of puberty blockers being "temporary" and reversible were never evidence based? I think we all deserve an explanation. TRANSCRIPT: A person who is transgender is someone whose internal sense of their gender—being a boy, girl, or something else—doesn't match their physical body. People who feel this way sometimes feel anxious when they begin to reach puberty and their body starts to change in ways that don't match their internal sense of their gender. These feelings are totally normal. If you feel you want more time to explore how you feel about your gender before your body starts to change, it's important to talk with a parent, counselor, therapist, or doctor about the feelings you have regarding your gender. After some discussion and counseling, you may be referred to an endocrinologist. Endocrinologists specialize in hormones, and they're the most likely to prescribe puberty blockers for someone who wants them. Puberty blockers are medications that will stop your body from changing. They're usually given as an injection or an implant. They block the production of hormones to stop or delay the physical changes of puberty. The effects of the medication are only temporary, so if a person stops using puberty blockers, the physical changes of puberty will begin again. Whether you identify as male, female, genderqueer, or something else, you're perfectly normal. And there are lots of ways to manage puberty so that it can be a fun, exciting time rather than a scary or stressful one.

Colin Wright

109,087 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

No child is born in the wrong body. Tavistock, GIDS, puberty blockers- all of it will go down as one of our country’s worst ‘health’ scandals. The Health Secretary has admitted that he is ‘uncomfortable’ about the trial. Only he has the executive power to block it. He could do the right thing and put child safety first. But he doesn’t have a backbone. My question to him this week 👇

No child is born in the wrong body. Tavistock, GIDS, puberty blockers- all of it will go down as one of our country’s worst ‘health’ scandals. The Health Secretary has admitted that he is ‘uncomfortable’ about the trial. Only he has the executive power to block it. He could do the right thing and put child safety first. But he doesn’t have a backbone. My question to him this week 👇

Suella Braverman

63,492 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

"It is child abuse — and we will TREAT it like child abuse!" 🔥 Stephen Miller just laid down the law about radical gender ideology — so-called "gender affirming care." "It is child abuse to change a child's gender, particularly if you do not inform the parents." "If a five year old or a six year old goes to school, or a seven year old goes to school, and the teacher tries to turn the boy into a girl, or the girl into a boy. That is child abuse, and this administration is treating that as child abuse."

"It is child abuse — and we will TREAT it like child abuse!" 🔥 Stephen Miller just laid down the law about radical gender ideology — so-called "gender affirming care." "It is child abuse to change a child's gender, particularly if you do not inform the parents." "If a five year old or a six year old goes to school, or a seven year old goes to school, and the teacher tries to turn the boy into a girl, or the girl into a boy. That is child abuse, and this administration is treating that as child abuse."

Townhall.com

182,010 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"No child put on puberty blockers at the earliest state of puberty, and whose natural puberty is permanently blocked, will ever have an orgasm or be fertile. No child can consent to that. Around 2,000 children have already been given puberty blockers for gender distress. So that is ample information available on impacts and outcomes held by gender clinics. It makes no sense to experiment on even more children whilst this exercise remains incomplete. Why isn't the Health Secretary prioritising the completion of this important data linkage study first before experimenting on more children?" Utterly superb speech from Rebecca Paul MP during the PATHWAYS puberty blocker debate in the House of Commons. Rebecca Paul MP is correct, the Health Secretary James Murray is incorrect.

"No child put on puberty blockers at the earliest state of puberty, and whose natural puberty is permanently blocked, will ever have an orgasm or be fertile. No child can consent to that. Around 2,000 children have already been given puberty blockers for gender distress. So that is ample information available on impacts and outcomes held by gender clinics. It makes no sense to experiment on even more children whilst this exercise remains incomplete. Why isn't the Health Secretary prioritising the completion of this important data linkage study first before experimenting on more children?" Utterly superb speech from Rebecca Paul MP during the PATHWAYS puberty blocker debate in the House of Commons. Rebecca Paul MP is correct, the Health Secretary James Murray is incorrect.

Genspect

72,034 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Another story of a young detransitioner. A girl who started with puberty blockers at 12, and proceeded on to testosterone and a double mastectomy. She regrets it all and is now dealing with health issues because of it, as a young 21-year-old. This should be a crime, and I hope Pierre Poilievre wins the next election and makes it one. How many kids’ lives need to be destroyed before we wake up?

Another story of a young detransitioner. A girl who started with puberty blockers at 12, and proceeded on to testosterone and a double mastectomy. She regrets it all and is now dealing with health issues because of it, as a young 21-year-old. This should be a crime, and I hope Pierre Poilievre wins the next election and makes it one. How many kids’ lives need to be destroyed before we wake up?

Billboard Chris 🌎

64,523 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,842 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

They told this young boy he was a girl and put him on puberty blockers and hormones at 13!! Totally destroyed his life. HOW MANY MORE OF THESE KIDS STORIES DO YOU NEED TO HEAR UNTIL YOU GET IT! Trans kids are the made up bullshit by sick adults. 🤮

They told this young boy he was a girl and put him on puberty blockers and hormones at 13!! Totally destroyed his life. HOW MANY MORE OF THESE KIDS STORIES DO YOU NEED TO HEAR UNTIL YOU GET IT! Trans kids are the made up bullshit by sick adults. 🤮

Buck Angel Transsexual

23,409 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Doctors will block the puberty of children with “gender incongruence” as part of a medical experiment to determine the impact on their well-being, says the British government. “Right now, there isn’t enough information about the possible benefits or risks that young people with gender incongruence may experience when taking puberty-suppressing hormones,” says King’s College London, which is set to carry out the experiment next year on children ages 10 through 15. “The study will be overseen by independent advisory groups,” adds King’s College, “and will be subject to rigorous regulatory and ethics checks by UK regulators and the Health Research Authority.” If there are indeed ethical and evidence-based “UK regulators” who are in charge of “ethics checks,” they must stop this unethical and dangerous medical experiment on children before it begins. There is already sufficient evidence that puberty blockers cause significant harm to the brain and skeletal system upon which the entire body depends. Ninety percent of the children who receive puberty blockers will go on to use cross sex hormones, which can cause cancer, and many others will receive surgeries that sterilize and deprive them of sexual function. Puberty blockers don’t improve mental health. Data from a gender clinic in Britain that the government shut down because it was causing so much harm, Tavistock, found that more children see their mental health worsen than see it improve. Children are not old enough to give their informed consent for puberty blockers, and they are not medically necessary; the children can receive safe and evidence-based treatments for anxiety, such as family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy, and gender anxiety goes away for the vast majority of children once they go through puberty. Earlier this year, psychiatrist and former Tavistock gender clinic board member, David Bell, argued that the UK law demands that experiments minimize potential interference with a child’s “state of development.” And yet it is with a child’s “state of development” that puberty blockers are meant to interfere. The experiment will not allow the doctors or children to be “double-blind,” or ignorant of whether they are getting the chemical or a placebo. It is easy to imagine how doctors biased toward puberty blockers would treat the children receiving them in ways that might temporarily boost their mental health and distort self-reporting. And it is based on a pseudo-scientific ideology that posits the existence of a non-entity called “gender identity” in children’s brains. And, finally, the UK government already declared puberty blockers to be risky last year, which is why it prevented any doctor, not just those in the NHS, from prescribing them. The UK government says the lack of evidence for puberty blockers is why it must study them, and it was the author of last year’s report on trans medicine, pediatrician Hilary Cass, a Baroness in the House of Lords, who agreed to these experiments. Her review found the evidence for their benefits was weak and the potential for negative effects was unclear. She thus recommended clinical trials, noting that some clinicians, children, and families felt the drugs were beneficial. But the Cass Review also noted that “In 2011, the UK trialled the use of puberty blockers in the ‘early intervention study,” and “Preliminary results from the early intervention study in 2015-2016 did not demonstrate benefit.” By 2020, there was still a “lack of any positive measurable outcomes.” The fact that some families and clinicians said they benefited from puberty blockers is an extremely weak source of evidence for moving forward with these experiments. And there is some evidence that parents play a key role in the relative anxiety of their children. For example, family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (FCBT) is more effective than Child CBT alone. It is difficult to understand Britain’s proposed unethical experiments on children. Most people in Britain are against allowing doctors to conduct such experiments on children. So why in the world did Baroness Cass recommend clinical trials, and why did the UK government follow through on them? Why is the UK moving forward with this disturbing and unethical agreement? And what will it take to stop them?... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the full article, and hear the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

24,130 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,300 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In Arizona, it is still completely legal to give wrong sex hormones and puberty blockers to kids. Many were in support of this bill and despite some adult trans coming to protest, I was still the only one in that room that wasn't given the chance to go through a normal puberty.

In Arizona, it is still completely legal to give wrong sex hormones and puberty blockers to kids. Many were in support of this bill and despite some adult trans coming to protest, I was still the only one in that room that wasn't given the chance to go through a normal puberty.

Chloe Cole ⭐️

61,143 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

2020 Benjamin Doyle Greens candidate interview .. “I prefer the company of young people” he also defines himself as a ‘Māori youth’ rangitahi, he was 31 at the time of the interview. He stresses that children can make their own decisions, and adults should listen to them, especially gay children. This is a line often pushed by the left, they want to lower the voting age and argue that children are in a better position than adults to make choice for themselves. The reason for this is clear, make society accept that children are equipped to make adult decisions and it gives the left immense and dangerous power over vulnerable youth. “Oh the child wanted to be trans, he knew that he wasn’t a boy” “Oh the child wanted to wear a dress because only the child knows his true identity” Will soon advance to- “Oh the child wanted to have sex” Doyle says he wishes his legacy to be identified as the politician who made children feel ‘safe’ and one who allowed youth a voice for their own decisions - “puberty blockers on demand, and easy access to surgery” Doyle is also the same politician who stood in parliament arguing that under 25 year olds should not be subject to the same sentencing as adults because “their pre-frontal cortex isn’t developed” so they are not equipped to make their own decisions. The Greens are out of control, hypocritical deeply perverted lunatics.

2020 Benjamin Doyle Greens candidate interview .. “I prefer the company of young people” he also defines himself as a ‘Māori youth’ rangitahi, he was 31 at the time of the interview. He stresses that children can make their own decisions, and adults should listen to them, especially gay children. This is a line often pushed by the left, they want to lower the voting age and argue that children are in a better position than adults to make choice for themselves. The reason for this is clear, make society accept that children are equipped to make adult decisions and it gives the left immense and dangerous power over vulnerable youth. “Oh the child wanted to be trans, he knew that he wasn’t a boy” “Oh the child wanted to wear a dress because only the child knows his true identity” Will soon advance to- “Oh the child wanted to have sex” Doyle says he wishes his legacy to be identified as the politician who made children feel ‘safe’ and one who allowed youth a voice for their own decisions - “puberty blockers on demand, and easy access to surgery” Doyle is also the same politician who stood in parliament arguing that under 25 year olds should not be subject to the same sentencing as adults because “their pre-frontal cortex isn’t developed” so they are not equipped to make their own decisions. The Greens are out of control, hypocritical deeply perverted lunatics.

Holyhekatuiteka

29,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

An 11-year-old child has gone missing in Faridabad. The father, in a state of panic and desperation, is seen trying to get the school gate opened. According to reports, the school had made the child stand outside and then shut the gate. From there, the child disappeared. Just imagine the trauma of a parent searching for his child, not knowing where he is or if he is safe. How can a school leave a minor unattended outside its premises? Where is the duty of care? Where is the basic humanity? Such negligence is unacceptable. Strict action must be taken against the school administration so that no other family has to suffer this nightmare.

An 11-year-old child has gone missing in Faridabad. The father, in a state of panic and desperation, is seen trying to get the school gate opened. According to reports, the school had made the child stand outside and then shut the gate. From there, the child disappeared. Just imagine the trauma of a parent searching for his child, not knowing where he is or if he is safe. How can a school leave a minor unattended outside its premises? Where is the duty of care? Where is the basic humanity? Such negligence is unacceptable. Strict action must be taken against the school administration so that no other family has to suffer this nightmare.

The Nalanda Index

370,934 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇬🇧 NHS TO TEST PUBERTY BLOCKERS ON 10-YEAR-OLDS IN CONTROVERSIAL NEW TRIAL The NHS is launching a trial giving puberty blockers to 250 children, some as young as 10, to study how the drugs affect development - including brain function. The move has sparked outrage given that the Cass Report - an independent NHS review- found no clinical evidence puberty blockers benefit gender-questioning youth. The now-closed Tavistock Clinic had already used these drugs for years, and the fallout led to widespread concern about long-term risks and lack of oversight. Studies show that 98% of children who begin puberty blockers go on to full medical transition - often involving lifelong hormone use and surgery. Many are asking why the NHS is running another trial, instead of prioritizing caution and safeguarding. These are irreversible decisions for kids who, by all standards, are not equipped to understand the long-term consequences. Why is this happening again? Source: Daily Mail

🇬🇧 NHS TO TEST PUBERTY BLOCKERS ON 10-YEAR-OLDS IN CONTROVERSIAL NEW TRIAL The NHS is launching a trial giving puberty blockers to 250 children, some as young as 10, to study how the drugs affect development - including brain function. The move has sparked outrage given that the Cass Report - an independent NHS review- found no clinical evidence puberty blockers benefit gender-questioning youth. The now-closed Tavistock Clinic had already used these drugs for years, and the fallout led to widespread concern about long-term risks and lack of oversight. Studies show that 98% of children who begin puberty blockers go on to full medical transition - often involving lifelong hormone use and surgery. Many are asking why the NHS is running another trial, instead of prioritizing caution and safeguarding. These are irreversible decisions for kids who, by all standards, are not equipped to understand the long-term consequences. Why is this happening again? Source: Daily Mail

Mario Nawfal

21,720 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

watching the trailer again it seems to me like chan is being given 2 options 🤔 this (the regular life where he had a normal job) or that (the life where he's rich and famous). even though he tries to choose 'this', his voice comes out all distorted and the barista insists on giving him 'that'. and even the cup that he presented as 'this' was turned so it actually read 'that'. as if he never had a choice at all and his fate was already decided for him

watching the trailer again it seems to me like chan is being given 2 options 🤔 this (the regular life where he had a normal job) or that (the life where he's rich and famous). even though he tries to choose 'this', his voice comes out all distorted and the barista insists on giving him 'that'. and even the cup that he presented as 'this' was turned so it actually read 'that'. as if he never had a choice at all and his fate was already decided for him

mina & that 🍮

79,383 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Dr Susan Bradley, the child psychiatrist who brought puberty blockers to Canada, joins Beyond Gender today at 2 PM ET. Dr. Bradley is one of the rare pioneers with the courage to face the harm done to these youth and admit that the experiment was a terrible mistake. This was such a fascinating, heartfelt, and compassionate conversation. I loved every moment of it.

Dr Susan Bradley, the child psychiatrist who brought puberty blockers to Canada, joins Beyond Gender today at 2 PM ET. Dr. Bradley is one of the rare pioneers with the courage to face the harm done to these youth and admit that the experiment was a terrible mistake. This was such a fascinating, heartfelt, and compassionate conversation. I loved every moment of it.

Mia Hughes

43,248 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This trans-identified man, Alice Michael Attwood, stabbed his 8-year-old daughter in the throat, severing her esophagus, and stabbed his 7-year-old son. He was not put in jail, or institutionalized, but released 2 days later! He went home and live-streamed video games, while his daughter had to eat through a feeding tube for months. He was scheduled for sentencing in January, but it was postponed, and he continues to wander our streets, now living out of a minivan painted with “Every Child Matters” on the outside. A follower of mine even saw him giving tarot card readings to young girls at the park! Just before his sentencing was delayed, he said this: “The only thing I really have to say is that we need to protect trans youth so that they don’t end up like me.” “And what the government here in Alberta is choosing to do to them now is going to make it worse.” Rule of thumb: Never take advice from a psychopath who tries to kill his own kids. What the government in Alberta did was ban puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for children under 16 years of age. And that will only make things better, because there is no such thing as a transgender child! Get this dangerous man off the streets!

Sensitive content

This trans-identified man, Alice Michael Attwood, stabbed his 8-year-old daughter in the throat, severing her esophagus, and stabbed his 7-year-old son. He was not put in jail, or institutionalized, but released 2 days later! He went home and live-streamed video games, while his daughter had to eat through a feeding tube for months. He was scheduled for sentencing in January, but it was postponed, and he continues to wander our streets, now living out of a minivan painted with “Every Child Matters” on the outside. A follower of mine even saw him giving tarot card readings to young girls at the park! Just before his sentencing was delayed, he said this: “The only thing I really have to say is that we need to protect trans youth so that they don’t end up like me.” “And what the government here in Alberta is choosing to do to them now is going to make it worse.” Rule of thumb: Never take advice from a psychopath who tries to kill his own kids. What the government in Alberta did was ban puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for children under 16 years of age. And that will only make things better, because there is no such thing as a transgender child! Get this dangerous man off the streets!

Billboard Chris 🌎

137,541 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten