Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says it is certainly possible COVID vaccines contributed to miscarriages in women vaccinated during pregnancy. “It’s certainly possible.” “You saw that reflected in Tony Fauci’s texts.” “I wrote a draft paper that we were never able to get published, where we found a slight increase in... miscarriage in the first trimester.” “Whether that’s right or not, it depends on peer review and all that, which we didn’t finish going through because I became director.” “Other people have published papers that say that there has not been a rise.” “That debate then rages on in the scientific literature.” “When you are recommending something for pregnant women, you have to be pretty certain.” “The baby that they have inside of them is vulnerable.” “Instead of using that normal sort of common sense approach to recommendations for pregnant women at the time, what they were saying was, ‘Ignore all those harms, forget about the possibility, forget about the scientific debate, forget about all that nuance, and just say you must take it.’” “I think that was a tremendous mistake.”show more

MAHA Action

99,270 subscribers

178,294 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Здоровье и велнес

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump pushes back on Florida removing all vaccine mandates, including for schoolchildren. He says some vaccines are a must. "I think we have to be careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The Polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that COVID [vax] is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that." "But you have some vaccines that are so incredible. And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very tough position." "Initially, I heard about it yesterday. And it's a tough stance. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple, they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, people should take it."

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump pushes back on Florida removing all vaccine mandates, including for schoolchildren. He says some vaccines are a must. "I think we have to be careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The Polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that COVID [vax] is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that." "But you have some vaccines that are so incredible. And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very tough position." "Initially, I heard about it yesterday. And it's a tough stance. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple, they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, people should take it."

Eric Daugherty

5,412,316 просмотров • 1 год назад

AOC: I have a local city councilman that has this saying: Woke 1 was crazy…. I think that during especially during covid, I think that the doors were really open in trying to entertain any and every policy that was going to get us to a better place. And I actually think that the discussions that had that were had in that time were quite fruitful. I think that when we talk about crime today, it's fundamentally different than the way that we talked about crime in bringing crime down. Right. And I think that we all share in the goals of having as low a crime rate as possible. I think that, you know, during lockdown, of course, rhetoric in that time is not rhetoric that we would use today. And I'm grateful that these candidates have the opportunity to present who they are to their electorate and what they're campaigning on in this moment

AOC: I have a local city councilman that has this saying: Woke 1 was crazy…. I think that during especially during covid, I think that the doors were really open in trying to entertain any and every policy that was going to get us to a better place. And I actually think that the discussions that had that were had in that time were quite fruitful. I think that when we talk about crime today, it's fundamentally different than the way that we talked about crime in bringing crime down. Right. And I think that we all share in the goals of having as low a crime rate as possible. I think that, you know, during lockdown, of course, rhetoric in that time is not rhetoric that we would use today. And I'm grateful that these candidates have the opportunity to present who they are to their electorate and what they're campaigning on in this moment

Acyn

1,250,927 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Some people called me an extremist because I spoke up for respect and protection for all women. I asked what extreme position they were specifically speaking about of course no response. Because there is none. What I clearly said is that Jews are human beings. We can’t tolerate antisemitism. That Hamas is a terror organisation, a danger to Palestinians Israelis and the West. We must unequivocally condemn terrorisme. What I said is that when you say MeToo, it has to be about all women, also women from other political divides and women like the Jewish women who were raped and mutilated on October 7 in Israel. When you defend women’s rights, defend all the women! If saying that all the women are equal and saying that anti-Semitism is unacceptable, is extremist, I don’t know how they call the real extremists. This breaks my heart. The problem is that when they call you extremist because you are having a free opinion, they put a huge target on you. And then the radical Muslims are going to try to kill you. This is what is happening in Europe and then nobody wants to speak. I refuse. Together, we must protect the Europe that we want for our children. Assita (This was part of my intervention in Rome on Sunday about the future of Europe)

Some people called me an extremist because I spoke up for respect and protection for all women. I asked what extreme position they were specifically speaking about of course no response. Because there is none. What I clearly said is that Jews are human beings. We can’t tolerate antisemitism. That Hamas is a terror organisation, a danger to Palestinians Israelis and the West. We must unequivocally condemn terrorisme. What I said is that when you say MeToo, it has to be about all women, also women from other political divides and women like the Jewish women who were raped and mutilated on October 7 in Israel. When you defend women’s rights, defend all the women! If saying that all the women are equal and saying that anti-Semitism is unacceptable, is extremist, I don’t know how they call the real extremists. This breaks my heart. The problem is that when they call you extremist because you are having a free opinion, they put a huge target on you. And then the radical Muslims are going to try to kill you. This is what is happening in Europe and then nobody wants to speak. I refuse. Together, we must protect the Europe that we want for our children. Assita (This was part of my intervention in Rome on Sunday about the future of Europe)

Assita Kanko MEP

84,001 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Asmongold explains why COVID destroyed trust in America "The problem wasn't that officials were going through different protocols. The problem was that those protocols were not allowed to be questioned, because that's fundamentally anti scientific." "The scientific method is built off of assuming that you're wrong. There are theories of gravity, theories of the Big Bang. Things we all take for granted are still theories." "COVID tried to begin at the finish line. It was like, we have all the answers. You can't ask what the answers are. You can't question them. You can't say whether they're wrong or not. All of that coming together made people distrust the government."

Asmongold explains why COVID destroyed trust in America "The problem wasn't that officials were going through different protocols. The problem was that those protocols were not allowed to be questioned, because that's fundamentally anti scientific." "The scientific method is built off of assuming that you're wrong. There are theories of gravity, theories of the Big Bang. Things we all take for granted are still theories." "COVID tried to begin at the finish line. It was like, we have all the answers. You can't ask what the answers are. You can't question them. You can't say whether they're wrong or not. All of that coming together made people distrust the government."

Asmongold Updates

11,316 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Acyn

718,768 просмотров • 1 год назад

Adam Silver on tanking in the NBA: “In terms of the tanking, there’s no question that what we saw this season was unprecedented. You talked a lot about it. Your colleagues have talked a lot about it. Again, I think a bit of a group think there obviously by definition it can’t be successful for all the teams that were engaging in that strategy. But on the other hand the analytics which all the sports are using today suggest that it’s a potentially a winning strategy and that is to race to the bottom in order to get higher draft picks. I think it was a bit of perfect storm this year. You have a perception of a very deep draft class, which it appears to be some great players coming into the league. And then even fans in particular cities and even media in those cities to a certain degree were rooting for their teams to tank and saying, you know, how well can your team be managed if you’re sort of just in the middle? You either got to be great or you got to let yourself get bad. And I think we had to respond not just to the narrative but to misalignment of incentives once sort of the guard rails came off and it was an accepted practice in this league.” (Via Stephen A Smith)

Adam Silver on tanking in the NBA: “In terms of the tanking, there’s no question that what we saw this season was unprecedented. You talked a lot about it. Your colleagues have talked a lot about it. Again, I think a bit of a group think there obviously by definition it can’t be successful for all the teams that were engaging in that strategy. But on the other hand the analytics which all the sports are using today suggest that it’s a potentially a winning strategy and that is to race to the bottom in order to get higher draft picks. I think it was a bit of perfect storm this year. You have a perception of a very deep draft class, which it appears to be some great players coming into the league. And then even fans in particular cities and even media in those cities to a certain degree were rooting for their teams to tank and saying, you know, how well can your team be managed if you’re sort of just in the middle? You either got to be great or you got to let yourself get bad. And I think we had to respond not just to the narrative but to misalignment of incentives once sort of the guard rails came off and it was an accepted practice in this league.” (Via Stephen A Smith)

NBA Courtside

11,520 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

WOW! Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson reveals Senator Ron Johnson knew about the Covid-jab DNA contamination but instructed frontline figures not to say anything because "we can't just go out there & tell the American people there's a possibility they're going to get cancer." In this clip from an episode of the Shannon Joy Show (Shannon Joy) posted to Rumble on October 7, 2025, Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜) says that she took part in a closed-door meeting with Johnson (Senator Ron Johnson) and "some of the frontline faces that we all love" approximately two years before Johnson's own congressional hearing on the Covid jabs. "I will never forget being in this meeting and we're talking about DNA contamination and what that potentially means to patients with...let's just say a cancer diagnosis," Jackson says, "And I will never forget Senator Ron Johnson said...we can't just go out there and tell the American people that there's a possibility that they're going to get cancer." "I appreciate what [Johnson] has done, certainly, like, 100% he's done great things," Jackson adds. "But damn him for saying that like that. That was two years ago. How many people could we have warned in that time that this is something that we know." For reference, Jackson is a whistleblower suing Pfizer and her former employer, Ventavia Research Group, in Federal court under the False Claims Act for fraud she witnessed during the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA clinical trials in September 2020. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "They all freaking know. They all know. Bobby Kennedy knows. Senator Ron Johnson knows. I'm sorry, I'm just going to go off here for a second. I will never forget being in a closed-door meeting with Senator Ron Johnson. Some of the frontline faces that we all love and we, we don't want to, you know, say too much, but I, will never forget being in this meeting and we're talking about DNA contamination and what that potentially means to patients with, you know, let's just say a cancer diagnosis. "You know, is this something that we need to be looking at? And I will never forget Senator Ron Johnson said we can't just, because what we were doing in this meeting was trying to develop or create an agenda for the following day which was going to be aired live to, you know, the, the public. And so we're trying to come up with this agenda. And he said, we can't just go out there and tell the American people that there's a possibility that they're going to get cancer. "I was, and Mary Bowden was there too. I was so disgusted by that statement. Because we need to be warning people. People need to be able to take their symptoms and their scans or whatever they're looking at, to their, to their doctors and be able to discuss this openly. And, and I just couldn't believe he said that. And I hopped on the next plane that I could get on, which was like at 5 o' clock in the morning from D.C., but I got the hell out of there. "And I appreciate what he has done, certainly like 100% he's done great things. But damn him for saying that like that. That was two years ago. How many people could we have warned in that time that this is something that we know. It's now on the Congressional Record, right? At his own hearing. But two years prior you said we can't say anything. We can't scare people. People need to be scared. People need to be scared of the United States government and people need to be scared certainly of the pharmaceutical companies who get away with it by the Department of Justice, by our government helping them get away with these crimes."

WOW! Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson reveals Senator Ron Johnson knew about the Covid-jab DNA contamination but instructed frontline figures not to say anything because "we can't just go out there & tell the American people there's a possibility they're going to get cancer." In this clip from an episode of the Shannon Joy Show (Shannon Joy) posted to Rumble on October 7, 2025, Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜) says that she took part in a closed-door meeting with Johnson (Senator Ron Johnson) and "some of the frontline faces that we all love" approximately two years before Johnson's own congressional hearing on the Covid jabs. "I will never forget being in this meeting and we're talking about DNA contamination and what that potentially means to patients with...let's just say a cancer diagnosis," Jackson says, "And I will never forget Senator Ron Johnson said...we can't just go out there and tell the American people that there's a possibility that they're going to get cancer." "I appreciate what [Johnson] has done, certainly, like, 100% he's done great things," Jackson adds. "But damn him for saying that like that. That was two years ago. How many people could we have warned in that time that this is something that we know." For reference, Jackson is a whistleblower suing Pfizer and her former employer, Ventavia Research Group, in Federal court under the False Claims Act for fraud she witnessed during the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA clinical trials in September 2020. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "They all freaking know. They all know. Bobby Kennedy knows. Senator Ron Johnson knows. I'm sorry, I'm just going to go off here for a second. I will never forget being in a closed-door meeting with Senator Ron Johnson. Some of the frontline faces that we all love and we, we don't want to, you know, say too much, but I, will never forget being in this meeting and we're talking about DNA contamination and what that potentially means to patients with, you know, let's just say a cancer diagnosis. "You know, is this something that we need to be looking at? And I will never forget Senator Ron Johnson said we can't just, because what we were doing in this meeting was trying to develop or create an agenda for the following day which was going to be aired live to, you know, the, the public. And so we're trying to come up with this agenda. And he said, we can't just go out there and tell the American people that there's a possibility that they're going to get cancer. "I was, and Mary Bowden was there too. I was so disgusted by that statement. Because we need to be warning people. People need to be able to take their symptoms and their scans or whatever they're looking at, to their, to their doctors and be able to discuss this openly. And, and I just couldn't believe he said that. And I hopped on the next plane that I could get on, which was like at 5 o' clock in the morning from D.C., but I got the hell out of there. "And I appreciate what he has done, certainly like 100% he's done great things. But damn him for saying that like that. That was two years ago. How many people could we have warned in that time that this is something that we know. It's now on the Congressional Record, right? At his own hearing. But two years prior you said we can't say anything. We can't scare people. People need to be scared. People need to be scared of the United States government and people need to be scared certainly of the pharmaceutical companies who get away with it by the Department of Justice, by our government helping them get away with these crimes."

Sense Receptor

263,232 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "I think a good idea would be that we frame the discussion not on us saying what you have not done and not on you saying what we have not done, but simply saying that what are we going to do for the people in India in the future, what are the action steps that we need to take. So I would say that it would be an interesting experiment to see if instead of you blaming us and we blaming you, we can try and say on this one issue where we agree, there's no disagreement, there we say, listen, let us just talk about the future of people of India." (Source: Sansad TV)

#WATCH | Delhi: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "I think a good idea would be that we frame the discussion not on us saying what you have not done and not on you saying what we have not done, but simply saying that what are we going to do for the people in India in the future, what are the action steps that we need to take. So I would say that it would be an interesting experiment to see if instead of you blaming us and we blaming you, we can try and say on this one issue where we agree, there's no disagreement, there we say, listen, let us just talk about the future of people of India." (Source: Sansad TV)

ANI

148,526 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS the Florida GOP and their pathetic Chairman for RIGGING the primary and LYING to voters by pulling a BAIT AND SWITCH! Says SPECIAL INTERESTS are choosing our candidate! “They do this summit and they say we're gonna do a debate, a governor debate. All right, so people like signed up thinking that they'd have this debate and they said NO CANDIDATE CAN DO ANY OTHER DEBATE EXCEPT OUR DEBATE and then they say oh, well only ONE GUY can debate so we're not gonna have a debate! I mean, I think people feel that that's a BAIT-ND-SWITCH! The party's job is NOT to try to engineer an outcome. The Party's job is to inform Republican voters and and try to increase participation. I know when I was running in 2018, this is the fact, I mean most of the people in the RPOF were not for me in the primary. I mean, that's just the reality and so it is what it is. If you don't ever have debates then the only way to get known is basically the person that raises the most money from special interests. And then you spend money to do it and if you're not able to do that, then you don't even get known to begin with and that's challenging. And I know when I ran in 2018, I got outspent probably three to one and I think having certainly the June debate that we did was a huge, huge thing to be able to inform people about who I was, what my background was, all these other things. So I think there should be debates generally. I don't think the party has any right to control the debates but I think how this was handled, you've got to be on the up and up here and you say you could do debate, do a debate! If you're gonna say other candidates can't do any other debate, but our debate, well, you definitely got to do the debate, right? So it has not been I think done properly and look, I mean, voters can make decisions about how they think of all that.”

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS the Florida GOP and their pathetic Chairman for RIGGING the primary and LYING to voters by pulling a BAIT AND SWITCH! Says SPECIAL INTERESTS are choosing our candidate! “They do this summit and they say we're gonna do a debate, a governor debate. All right, so people like signed up thinking that they'd have this debate and they said NO CANDIDATE CAN DO ANY OTHER DEBATE EXCEPT OUR DEBATE and then they say oh, well only ONE GUY can debate so we're not gonna have a debate! I mean, I think people feel that that's a BAIT-ND-SWITCH! The party's job is NOT to try to engineer an outcome. The Party's job is to inform Republican voters and and try to increase participation. I know when I was running in 2018, this is the fact, I mean most of the people in the RPOF were not for me in the primary. I mean, that's just the reality and so it is what it is. If you don't ever have debates then the only way to get known is basically the person that raises the most money from special interests. And then you spend money to do it and if you're not able to do that, then you don't even get known to begin with and that's challenging. And I know when I ran in 2018, I got outspent probably three to one and I think having certainly the June debate that we did was a huge, huge thing to be able to inform people about who I was, what my background was, all these other things. So I think there should be debates generally. I don't think the party has any right to control the debates but I think how this was handled, you've got to be on the up and up here and you say you could do debate, do a debate! If you're gonna say other candidates can't do any other debate, but our debate, well, you definitely got to do the debate, right? So it has not been I think done properly and look, I mean, voters can make decisions about how they think of all that.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

30,272 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

Deutsch Explains

116,352 просмотров • 1 год назад

“The key thing about this recommendation is that it emphasizes parental autonomy.” NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says President Trump’s vaccine executive order puts parents back in charge. “You should be able to have a say in how your child receives the vaccines that are recommended for them.” “That’s really one of the most important things that the President did yesterday.” “That principle is gonna guide our thinking regarding how we communicate to the public the scientific evidence and the medical realities about the benefits and potential harms of vaccines.”

“The key thing about this recommendation is that it emphasizes parental autonomy.” NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says President Trump’s vaccine executive order puts parents back in charge. “You should be able to have a say in how your child receives the vaccines that are recommended for them.” “That’s really one of the most important things that the President did yesterday.” “That principle is gonna guide our thinking regarding how we communicate to the public the scientific evidence and the medical realities about the benefits and potential harms of vaccines.”

MAHA Action

70,682 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

American Citizens Are Calling For Accountably Of Their Money Being Spent On Illegal Immigration Programs Illegal Immigrants Given Up To $9,000 Per Month For Housing Assistance 🚨 “Let's talk about the money that is being spent. I think that there needs to be a federal audit against the company that we have contracted out to take care of the migrants. We have nurses that are being paid $64,000 a month. We have security officers that are being paid as much as $24,000 a month. We have home health care workers that are being paid up to $17,000 a month. You don't think that Chicagoans could have benefited from that? We have citizens in this city that have been on the waiting list for affordable housing for years, and migrants have been bumped in front of them. We have people who have been given up to $9,000 a month for housing assistance. That amount of the city of Chicago. We are not am pro black. I am for my marginalized who have been expect us to give up our parks places in our community for others. We're not saying that there's not room here, but what we are saying is that we are not going to step aside for you to accommodate them when you have continued to leave us out of the equation. So I'm not just talking to Brandon Johnson right now. I'm talking to Governor Pritzker and I'm talking to President Biden and I want you to understand This upcoming political year where the Democratic Party is on the menu, hear me, people of Chicago, of Illinois and of the United States. It is time for us as black people to stop voting party. It is time for us to stop voting color. It is time for us to start voting our self-interest. And if the Democrats in the city of Chicago, the state of Illinois, and the country of USA refuses to listen to us, then it is time for us to start looking at other alternatives. We are looking at all the alternatives. We will not step aside and continue to be mistreated. We will not continue to be disrespected. I'm looking at people who are coming here from another country giving work visas, giving social security cards. Nobody is asking them what walk of life that they come from. You don't think that our brothers who have been in prison, out and who have changed their lives will benefit for the same opportunities that we're giving these migrants. And I'm not saying that they don't deserve those opportunities. But what I am saying is we deserve them first. What I am saying is you can't continue to put us on the back burner and think that we're going to continue to be okay with it. We've done that for long enough. And what we're saying here today is that is no longer acceptable to our governor that you're not going to continue to set money aside for people who don't live here and disrespect, mistreat and forget about us. You've forgotten about us. You have treated us as if we don't matter and we're saying to you you're not going to continue to do this. We're saying to you to see us. You're dumping people into our communities who are going to at some point move us out of the say to you, if you want to glimpse into what's going to happen, look at how people of color are being treated in Venezuela right now. We seem to forget that Venezuela was one of the first places that had African slaves that they were taken to. We're forgetting about that. And so we're forgetting that there are blacks in Venezuela who are being treated the same way we are. And so for us to expect that they're going to come here and be put into society and treat us differently is a pipe drain.”

American Citizens Are Calling For Accountably Of Their Money Being Spent On Illegal Immigration Programs Illegal Immigrants Given Up To $9,000 Per Month For Housing Assistance 🚨 “Let's talk about the money that is being spent. I think that there needs to be a federal audit against the company that we have contracted out to take care of the migrants. We have nurses that are being paid $64,000 a month. We have security officers that are being paid as much as $24,000 a month. We have home health care workers that are being paid up to $17,000 a month. You don't think that Chicagoans could have benefited from that? We have citizens in this city that have been on the waiting list for affordable housing for years, and migrants have been bumped in front of them. We have people who have been given up to $9,000 a month for housing assistance. That amount of the city of Chicago. We are not am pro black. I am for my marginalized who have been expect us to give up our parks places in our community for others. We're not saying that there's not room here, but what we are saying is that we are not going to step aside for you to accommodate them when you have continued to leave us out of the equation. So I'm not just talking to Brandon Johnson right now. I'm talking to Governor Pritzker and I'm talking to President Biden and I want you to understand This upcoming political year where the Democratic Party is on the menu, hear me, people of Chicago, of Illinois and of the United States. It is time for us as black people to stop voting party. It is time for us to stop voting color. It is time for us to start voting our self-interest. And if the Democrats in the city of Chicago, the state of Illinois, and the country of USA refuses to listen to us, then it is time for us to start looking at other alternatives. We are looking at all the alternatives. We will not step aside and continue to be mistreated. We will not continue to be disrespected. I'm looking at people who are coming here from another country giving work visas, giving social security cards. Nobody is asking them what walk of life that they come from. You don't think that our brothers who have been in prison, out and who have changed their lives will benefit for the same opportunities that we're giving these migrants. And I'm not saying that they don't deserve those opportunities. But what I am saying is we deserve them first. What I am saying is you can't continue to put us on the back burner and think that we're going to continue to be okay with it. We've done that for long enough. And what we're saying here today is that is no longer acceptable to our governor that you're not going to continue to set money aside for people who don't live here and disrespect, mistreat and forget about us. You've forgotten about us. You have treated us as if we don't matter and we're saying to you you're not going to continue to do this. We're saying to you to see us. You're dumping people into our communities who are going to at some point move us out of the say to you, if you want to glimpse into what's going to happen, look at how people of color are being treated in Venezuela right now. We seem to forget that Venezuela was one of the first places that had African slaves that they were taken to. We're forgetting about that. And so we're forgetting that there are blacks in Venezuela who are being treated the same way we are. And so for us to expect that they're going to come here and be put into society and treat us differently is a pipe drain.”

Wall Street Apes

199,495 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Zack Polanski, "Why do we hear this phrase all the time, unconscious bias?" Professor Keon West, "It's incredibly comfortable" "In the UK it's so hard to have a conversation about racism or sexism" "You won't hear people say: I did that and that was a racist thing to do" "You can go on TV and say you hate seeing a bunch of black and brown faces - like Reform UK's Sarah Pochin - and say you cannot be racist, it must be a misunderstanding" "Similarly men will say all sorts of things but not say that was sexist" "I think that is considered so impolite and so hurtful, to own up to that bias, that we sneak in a word in front of that, 'unconscious', and suddenly we don't have to feel quite so bad" "And everybody has it" "That focus that makes us calmer about the bias, that's really for the benefit of the people feeling bias" "It's not at all for the benefit of the people on the receiving end of the bias"

Zack Polanski, "Why do we hear this phrase all the time, unconscious bias?" Professor Keon West, "It's incredibly comfortable" "In the UK it's so hard to have a conversation about racism or sexism" "You won't hear people say: I did that and that was a racist thing to do" "You can go on TV and say you hate seeing a bunch of black and brown faces - like Reform UK's Sarah Pochin - and say you cannot be racist, it must be a misunderstanding" "Similarly men will say all sorts of things but not say that was sexist" "I think that is considered so impolite and so hurtful, to own up to that bias, that we sneak in a word in front of that, 'unconscious', and suddenly we don't have to feel quite so bad" "And everybody has it" "That focus that makes us calmer about the bias, that's really for the benefit of the people feeling bias" "It's not at all for the benefit of the people on the receiving end of the bias"

Farrukh

70,597 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад