Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dr. Mary Bowden on Rogan's pod: "Brook Jackson...a [Pfizer] whistleblower...found they were skipping necessary steps [in their C19 jab clinical trial.]" "[This lawsuit] could bankrupt Pfizer, but...Pam Bondi[, i.e., Trump's] DOJ, is [stopping] this case from happening." (1/8) Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (Mary Talley Bowden MD) brought up one...

57,814 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Sense Receptor's profile picture
Sense Receptor1 year ago

(2/8) Pfizer Whistleblower Brook Jackson explains how Trump's DOJ requested the dismissal of her lawsuit against Pfizer concerning its fraudulent COVID-jab "clinical trial." Trump's DOJ said her case "lacks merit" and "does not align with public health policy." "The Biden administration had access to the same data that Trump does," Jackson says in this clip from an interview with the Last American Vagabond, which was posted on May 7, 2025. "[The two administrations have held] the same position. Nothing has changed."

Sense Receptor's profile picture
Sense Receptor1 year ago

(3/8) From Pfizer's request to dismiss Jackson's lawsuit: "The [scope of work] describes a 'large scale vaccine manufacturing DEMONSTRATION that imposes no requirements relating to Good Clinical Practices ('CGP') or related FDA regulations." (Emphasis added.) Source:

Sense Receptor's profile picture
Sense Receptor1 year ago

(4/8) HHS Secretary RFK Jr. has said that Pfizer's "clinical trial" was "MEANINGLESS THEATER." (Emphasis added.) He notes that Pfizer's injections are "demonstration product[s]" and not "medical product[s]." He adds that the "the FDA has no authority" over the jabs.

Sense Receptor's profile picture
Sense Receptor1 year ago

(5/8) Trump's Department of Justice sides with Pfizer against Brook Jackson—in 2025!!!

Sense Receptor's profile picture
Sense Receptor1 year ago

(6/8) When requesting that Jackson's case be dismissed, Trump's DOJ said that her case is "inconsistent with [the federal government's] public health policy."

Sense Receptor's profile picture
Sense Receptor1 year ago

(7/8) The FDA has always known that there were more deaths in Pfizer's COVID "vaccine" arm vs. its placebo arm. In the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action for COMIRNATY (Pfizer's ostensibly FDA-approved COVID jab), it's noted that there were 21 deaths in the injection arm and 17 in the placebo arm. Source:

Sense Receptor's profile picture
Sense Receptor1 year ago

(8/8) Dr. Mary Talley Bowden's full Joe Rogan interview:

Pray4Truth🇺🇸💕🙏's profile picture
Pray4Truth🇺🇸💕🙏1 year ago

@MdBreathe What is wrong with @realDonaldTrump @AGPamBondi @RobertKennedyJr and this administration that they would put a criminal company ahead of the public and the promises they made to us Pfizer can be bought and rebuilt with someone ethical at the helm

Deskprotestor's profile picture
Deskprotestor1 year ago

@MdBreathe Not surprised. Bondi was another mistake by Trump! Another Bill Barr. Happy to be wrong.

Randal Turner's profile picture
Randal Turner1 year ago

Their Public Health Policy is that commoners take the vaccines, they are their elitist cockroach group do not take the vaccines as they are too dangerous for them and their spoiled little turds. commoners/the public citizens are to be used to experiment on. MKULTRA drugs etc.

Related Videos

Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's lawyer: "Bobby Kennedy knows all about the Pfizer [Covid-jab] fraud...he's the [DOJ's client] in this case...We...appeal to [him & the admin] to change its position on this case" Note RFKJr.'s called the C19 jabs "mass murder." See tweet 2 This clip of Warner Mendenhall (Warner Mendenhall), an activist, citizen, and lawyer representing Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜), is taken from an interview with Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (Mary Talley Bowden MD) posted to Rumble on October 1, 2025. For reference, Jackson is a whistleblower suing Pfizer and her former employer, Ventavia Research Group, in Federal court under the False Claims Act for fraud she witnessed during the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA clinical trials in September 2020. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So, you know, a lot of people talk about the EUA and some other issues, but fundamentally, Pfizer contracted for a safe and effective vaccine for COVID-19. That is far from what they delivered. On top of that, they were supposed to, and we can talk about this in a minute, they were supposed to deliver this drug following current good manufacturing practices. It's right in the contracts. And they didn't do that either. And we can go into that issue. "But what happened in the process of litigating this case is the federal government decided that this case somehow was contrary to the public health policy of the United States. And it came in and asserted that under the Biden administration. And the judge dismissed it. So now it's on appeal. "They had no good cause to dismiss Brook Jackson's case. None whatsoever. They couldn't. There is a sort of a standard at DOJ in terms of when you would step in to dismiss one of these cases. They didn't meet any of those standards. They couldn't prove any good cause. But the judge went ahead and allowed the federal government to step in and dismiss the case and stop our litigation and stop our discovery against Pfizer, just based on the federal government say-so. "We are still, and we were hopeful, when the administration changed in January that we would have a change in position, within this administration. And certainly Bobby Kennedy knows all about the Pfizer fraud, and he is the client of the DOJ in this case. So we are, you know, we continue to appeal to Bobby and the administration to change a position on this case and let us do the work. We're willing to do the work for the American people to get the discovery and find out everything that that Pfizer did."

Sense Receptor

62,419 views • 9 months ago

"Brook Jackson's case against Pfizer...[is] the largest case in the world...there's literally...trillions in potential damages." "The clinical trial data was manipulated...[Pfizer's] vaccine...increased all cause mortality...And...they hid deaths." (1/7) Warner Mendenhall (Warner Mendenhall), an activist, citizen, and lawyer representing Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜), describes for Leslie Manookian (Leslie Manookian) of Health Freedom Defense Fund (Health Freedom Defense Fund) how the pharma giant conducted a "manipulated" clinical trial for its COVID injections. Mendenhall notes that Pfizer manipulated its "clinical trial" (which was really a "demonstration" of a clinical trial—see tweet 2), in various ways. First and foremost, by "[hiding] deaths" in the "shot" arm of the trial. Furthermore, Mendenhall notes that more people died in the "shot arm" of Pfizer's trial than in the placebo arm. (Indeed, the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action published by the FDA on November 8, 2021 for Pfizer's *supposedly* FDA approved injection, COMIRNATY, clearly stated that there were 21 deaths in the injection arm of the trial and 17 in the placebo arm—see tweet 5). Also note that while Mendenhall doesn't discuss this point in this clip, Trump's own Department of Justice requested—in 2025(!)—that Jackson's case against Pfizer be dismissed. "Trump sides with Pfizer!" Jackson wrote on X on April 28, 2025. "[Trump's] DOJ explained to the court that it has had continued access to the Pfizer vaccine clinical trial data and the vaccine is effective," Jackson added. Trump's DOJ asked the court to dismiss Jackson's lawsuit against Pfizer, in part, because her case is "inconsistent with public policy" (see tweet 5). Furthermore, note that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. himself has called Pfizer's COVID-injection clinical trial "kabuki theater." Kennedy noted in an interview conducted in 2023 that the trial "was meaningless theater." He added that Pfizer's COVID injection "is a demonstration product, not a medical product" and that "the FDA has no authority over it." (See tweet 3.) ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "We have a couple of cases that are very well known. Brook Jackson's case against Pfizer I think is the most well known. But it is something that we've had no mainstream coverage of. What could be the largest case in the world right now because there's literally hundreds, of billions, essentially trillions in potential damages that Pfizer would never be able to pay. "They'd be bankrupt if Brook Jackson is, successful in her case. That case is again, it's very simple. The clinical trial data was manipulated to show that this drug, was somewhat effective against COVID 19. They started with 43,000 people in the clinical trial, but the data that the FDA, made a decision on was only based on 170 people out of 43,000. So why, why only 170? "I think anyone would ask if you have 43,000 data points. It's because that came after they went through the data, you know, and basically manipulated it to where it showed a quote unquote 90 or 95% effectiveness rate. But if you go back to a little broader view of the data, you can see, right in the broader view that of the folks who didn't get the vaccine, there were 1800 who got COVID-19. "Of the folks who did get the supposed vaccine, there were like 1600 that got COVID 19. That is not a statistically relevant difference in any way and really doesn't show, any benefit from it. And then you look at all cause mortality. That's a normal thing to look at with any drug. What does it do to all cause mortality? If you take the drug, it should reduce all cause mortality. This didn't, when you took the vaccine, it increased all cause mortality among the vaccine arm. And I hate to use the word vaccine, but I'll do that as a shorthand here. "Let's make people understand that the shot arm had higher all cause mortality. So more people were dying if they got the drug than the ones if they didn't. That's just a good overall test of something. And then they hid deaths. So we knew there were deaths. They were hidden. And it's taken a lot of basically citizen and amateur research to go through all those tens of thousands of pages of Pfizer documents. But they found them and people who were injured in the trial. They managed to exclude them, and not count them as serious adverse events. "And we have a great one, great example is a gentleman out of Argentina who's contacted us, Augusto Roux. He's been fighting that issue in Argentina. And that site and Augusto Roux. And what he had to say to us was really interesting because they managed to enroll 4,000 people in a clinical trial in a couple of weeks. Get them run through, get the data and. And it was at a military hospital. And. And then on top of it all, there has been in the Argentine press an allegation of bribery. "And one of the chief researchers who by the way, wrote a, wrote an article for the New England Journal of Medicine is Fernando Pollock. He's who ran that clinical trial down there. He's well known to us in the United States. He's no longer licensed in the United States. I'm not sure exactly why. He has military and intelligence contacts, which makes me very curious. And he wrote this article in the New England Journal of Medicine, which has essentially been debunked since then about how effective this vaccine, trial. This vaccine was, based on the trial numbers. So all kinds of very interesting things on that case."

Sense Receptor

25,606 views • 1 year ago

Jillian Michaels: “Should there be a Nuremberg-style trial for Covid-era crimes?” Dr. Mary Bowden: “Yes.” “But I don’t think it will happen … during Trump’s term.” “You see Trump with [Pfizer CEO] Bourla in the Oval Office.” “Now, there’s two big lawsuits that give me hope.” “The first one is Brook Jackson, who was a whistleblower.” “She was overseeing the research at Pfizer at one of their labs, and she noticed all these issues going on.” “They were unblinding the patients, they weren’t following the protocols that were set out for the research.” “When she reported it, she got fired.” “She is suing Pfizer.” “It’s a RICO case, a fraud case, and if it’s successful, it could be huge.” “It could take down Pfizer.” “The problem is Pam Bondi is blocking it—trying to get the case dismissed.” “There’s also another case, and people need to know this.” “If you think you were injured by these shots … and you report it to the doctor that gave you the shot, they are legally obligated to report that injury to VAERS.” “If they don’t, you can sue them, and you have until probably 2029 to do this.” “Deb Conrad was a physician assistant at Rochester Hospital. She was reporting injuries to VAERS, and she got fired for reporting too many, and she is suing.” “It’s made it past the motion to dismiss. It’s in discovery.” “If that sets a good precedent, then people can open the floodgates.” Mary Talley Bowden MD Jillian Michaels Brook Jackson 💜

Holden Culotta

100,151 views • 7 months ago

Pfizer whistleblower's lawyer: "If people can't get justice [in court] they're going to take justice into their own hands &...the PREP Act strip[s] us of our ability to go to court...creating a pathway...[for] violence...as people can't find justice for their...dead children" This clip of Warner Mendenhall (Warner Mendenhall), an activist, citizen, and lawyer representing Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson (Brook Jackson 💜), is taken from an interview with Dr. Mary Talley Bowden (Mary Talley Bowden MD) posted to Rumble on October 1, 2025. For reference, Jackson is a whistleblower suing Pfizer and her former employer, Ventavia Research Group, in Federal court under the False Claims Act for fraud she witnessed during the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA clinical trials in September 2020. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "You know, what the court system does that I don't think most people realize is it's a way to mediate violence in society. And the problem is, if people can't get justice, they're going to take justice into their own hands. And I think that's forgotten when we have laws like the PREP Act that just strip of. Strip us of our ability to go to court. You are actually creating, a pathway that's going to cause more violence in society. "As people can't find justice for their dead loved ones and their dead children, they're going to take. They're going to take it into their own hands. You know, why does Fauci have security? Because there are thousands and thousands of people very angry at him who cannot get justice in the courts. "And we see that everywhere in our society. I mean, I see hospital security really getting beefed up. Why? Because, you can't find justice against these hospitals. We just tried a case, you know, in June. It had a bad outcome, in my view. And it's very difficult to get to court in the first place, then to find justice. And you have very, very frustrated parents and family members, that they need to see a pathway to, get justice for the deaths and injuries of their loved ones."

Sense Receptor

32,271 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines *INCREASE* your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan

KanekoaTheGreat

2,292,607 views • 3 years ago