正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found that unvaccinated kids had fewer doctor visits and better health outcomes. Behavioral issues were among the many conditions that showed a significant increase, with data indicating a 4.1× higher rate. Unsurprisingly, soon after the study was published, his medical license was revoked.

13,016 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,539,424 次观看 • 1 年前

He Studied 10,000 of His Own Patients, Found a 400% Increase in Childhood Illnesses Linked to Vaccines, and Lost His License for Telling the Truth Stanford's Prof. Annelise Barron reveals the story of Dr. Paul Thomas, an Oregon pediatrician who believed in informed choice. He typically recommended a conservative, Danish-style vaccine schedule (≈17 shots by age 5) instead of the full CDC schedule, but honored parents' decisions for any path, including zero vaccines. Dr. Thomas then did what more should: he looked at the real-world data. He analyzed thousands of children born into his practice, tracking diagnoses before age five. His study compared health outcomes—from ear infections and allergic rhinitis to ADHD—between his largely partially vaccinated/selectively vaccinated patients and the completely unvaccinated cohort. The findings were unequivocal and alarming. The vaccinated children had a 4x higher risk of a wide range of health issues. For publishing this objective, practice-based data, the system made an example of him. His medical license was revoked. His paper was retracted. He was professionally destroyed for telling an inconvenient truth. This case is about more than vaccines. It's about the suppression of scientific inquiry and the silencing of a doctor who simply reported what he found in his own patient population. As Prof. Barron states, this was "real data" that should have been headline news, prompting a serious scientific discussion. Instead, it was buried. When we silence messengers for their data, we are not protecting public health—we are protecting a narrative. The truth has a cost, and Dr. Paul Thomas paid it.

Camus

100,760 次观看 • 11 个月前

My God… what have they done💔 🚨 Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study • Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree met with Dr. Zervos, a pro-vaccine researcher involved in clinical trials, to propose a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. • The study was a large-scale analysis of children enrolled at Henry Ford Medical Center from 2000 to 2016, tracked from birth onward. • The study compared unvaccinated children to those who received one or more of the Childhood vaccines, using actual medical records for data. 🔻 Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioral problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities 🔻 Vaccinated Children: • Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. •• Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child ••• Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. •••• Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher •••••Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, Developmental Delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, Speech Disorder 🔻 The study was never published because its findings contradicted the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe. Dr. Zervos and the research team refused to publish due to concerns about job security and making doctors uncomfortable, despite acknowledging the study’s findings.

MJTruthUltra

642,551 次观看 • 1 年前

"Data Shows Highly Vaccinated Kids Don't 'Protect Grandma'....Vaccinated Children Have Up To 8X More Infections & Are The Ones Spreading Disease." Dr Paul Thomas, MD "Unvaccinated Kids Are Always Healthier....They Are The Ones Who Are Actually Providing Protection For Others." There's nothing medically or biochemically necessary in vaccine ingredients. Vaccines do not fortify our health nor do they benefit us in any way. In fact, all of the ingredients in vaccines are harmful & toxic. We now have 4 robust vaccinated vs unvaccinated studies. Within that data, unvaccinated children are always healthier & experience little to no chronic conditions compared to those who are vaccinated. These research studies by Neil Z Miller, Anthony R Mawson, Dr Brian S Hooker & Dr Paul Thomas reveal the undeniable truth & devastating harm that comes to children from vaccination. Vaccinated children have: 28X the rate of acute & chronic ear infections. 14X the rate for GI gastrointestinal disorders. 21X the rate of ADD/ADHD Diagnosis. Research Data For Chronic Medical Conditions Suffered By Vaccinated -vs- Unvaccinated: Rate of all chronic conditions: Vaccinated 60% Unvaccinated 5.71% Rate of Autism: Vaccinated 3.2% Unvaccinated 0% Rate of Asthma: Vaccinated 7.7% Unvaccinated 0% Rate of ADHD: Vaccinated 9.4% Unvaccinated 0.47% Rate of ADD: Vaccinated 5% Unvaccinated 1% Rate of Cancer: Vaccinated 6% Unvaccinated 0% Rate of Allergies: Vaccinated 10.4% Unvaccinated 0.4% Rate of Diabetes: Vaccinated 10% Unvaccinated 0% Rate of Heart Conditions: Vaccinated 48% Unvaccinated 0% Rate of Juvenile Arthritis: Vaccinated 16.67% Unvaccinated 0% 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇 👇Health Outcomes: Vaxxed Versus UnVaxxed👇 👇Vaccination & Neurodevelopment Disorders👇 Speaker: PaulThomas Video: @safeandeffectivepod

Valerie Anne Smith

138,621 次观看 • 1 年前

Aaron Siri breaks down why Dr. Scott's dismissal of a pivotal vaccine safety study is itself fundamentally flawed. Dr. Scott, labeled the Henry Ford Health System study "fatally flawed" due to "detection bias"—the idea that vaccinated kids seek more medical care and thus have more conditions diagnosed. But as Siri points out, had Dr. Scott actually read the submission, he would have seen the study authors specifically designed multiple sensitivity analyses to rule this exact bias out. Here’s what they found: 1. They Quantified Care-Seeking: Vaccinated children averaged 7 medical visits/year. Unvaccinated children averaged 2. This suggests less illness. However, the 17% of unvaccinated kids with a chronic issue averaged 5 visits/year—proving that when they were sick, they did go to the doctor. 2. They Removed the Healthiest Kids: To be ultra-conservative, the authors re-ran the analysis after removing all children who never sought medical care. This eliminated the healthiest unvaccinated cohort. The result? The statistically significant increase in chronic illness in the vaccinated group remained. 3. They Controlled for Duration: To ensure kids were observed equally long, they analyzed only children in the system from birth for 5+ years. The result? The risk ratio for chronic illness in the vaccinated group actually increased, further affirming the findings. 4. They Used a Control Condition: They looked at cancer rates—a condition not plausibly linked to vaccination. Here, they found no statistically significant difference, proving their method could tell a true signal from noise. Siri concludes: The establishment calls this study "flawed by design" not because of its methodology, but because of its outcome. It was designed by professionals to detect safety issues—and it found them. That is what makes it so threatening. The real fatal flaw isn't in the study's design—it's in the refusal to engage with its rigorous, validating evidence.

Camus

175,643 次观看 • 1 年前