Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dr. Scott Gottlieb Slams Trump's Incoming CDC Head For Trying to Remove Liability Protection From Vaccine Makers & For Forcing the FDA to Take 'Preservatives' (Thimerosal) Out of the MMR Vaccine "He sponsored bills to do away with the liability protection that allows companies to bring these vaccines onto...

68,096 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

34 Comments

Blake Kuhn's profile picture
Blake Kuhn1 year ago

As a father of a vaccine injured child, I think they're terrified of Trumps move to pull back the curtain on their untouchable status... This type of transparency shouldn't even be controversial but here we are. They wouldn't push back if they didn't have something to hide...

James Wilkinson's profile picture
James Wilkinson1 year ago

Vaccine manufacturer board member opposes losing their free pass for product liability...what a shock.

Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD's profile picture
Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD1 year ago

It is always right to remove preservatives from medications when possible, particularly when those preservatives are the source of concern, particularly when that preservative is any form of mercury, particularly when its intended for every kid, EVEN if the cost goes up a little.

Gain of Fauci's profile picture
Gain of Fauci1 year ago

I hate him with a passion.

Jefferey Jaxen's profile picture
Jefferey Jaxen1 year ago

Looking forward to the new leadership at FDA, NIH, CDC, & HHS. Gottlieb and the 'settled science' crew couldn't even do proper vaccine safety investigations when they had the opportunity.

Wind_In_Woven's profile picture
Wind_In_Woven1 year ago

Oh FFS. Why do Dems always oppose making things more natural and safe for humankind?

Bryce M. Lipscomb's profile picture
Bryce M. Lipscomb1 year ago

That’s a good thing

FloridaGirl 🍊's profile picture
FloridaGirl 🍊1 year ago

Healthy baby's death attributed to SIDS. Coroner Rick Taylor filed away the cause as a mystery without conducting a thorough probe. He didn't ask the Cooleys what happened in the days before Onyxx died, or visit the scene - or even order an autopsy.

Nate's profile picture
Nate1 year ago

I voted for change and am ready to see it

Andrea's profile picture
Andrea1 year ago

@billyboblee310 Doesn't @DrDaveWeldon sound magnificent? He wants vaccines to be safe. Only a big pharma board member would be against that. 🤔

SeekingTruth's profile picture
SeekingTruth1 year ago

Yes, of course, he would say that because Scott Gottlieb is on Pfizer’s Board of Directors.

Arnold's profile picture
Arnold1 year ago

don't be like Scott

Truth Hunter ☀️🐭's profile picture
Truth Hunter ☀️🐭1 year ago

For those that don’t know about our friend Scott Gottlieb, Scott exemplifies the “revolving door” amongst major pharma roles.

Mike Valletutti 🎯's profile picture
Mike Valletutti 🎯1 year ago

Those “preservatives” in the MMR…what does the safety data say about MMR vaccines pre and post removing the chemicals? Open up the CDC database and let us all see.

Hans Neat's profile picture
Hans Neat1 year ago

The guys that’s on the board of Pfizer opposes RFK? Who knew…

JacksonSmith7777's profile picture
JacksonSmith77771 year ago

So liability protection is what allows the vaccine companies to bring them into the market? So they can't bring them into the market unless they're Protected from liability for hurting people? So how about bring a safe product then,. and do blind double placebo long-term Studies

whatwhynot's profile picture
whatwhynot1 year ago

Isnt this the same dude sitting on Pfizer board?

Kevin Klapak's profile picture
Kevin Klapak1 year ago

Pfizer director @ScottGottliebMD getting paid 500k+ wants to act like he's unbiased on the subject 🤣

MAGA’s the Fix™'s profile picture
MAGA’s the Fix™1 year ago

Sounds good to me.

Angela's profile picture
Angela1 year ago

We don't want liability protections. What part of this do these people not get?

JacksonSmith7777's profile picture
JacksonSmith77771 year ago

So putting preservatives in it lowers the cost for the people?😄 He's so concerned. And taking away the protection for them to put out any product that hurts people is also a problem? And he's freely admitting it. This is how far gone these evil bastards are

Quetzalcoatl's profile picture
Quetzalcoatl1 year ago

It’s nice to see the evil folks panicking for once.

Fallen Leaf Capital's profile picture
Fallen Leaf Capital1 year ago

Gottlieb is a low-life sack of rotting pig excrement and should spend the rest of his life in prison with Fauci.

kdeanc 🇺🇲's profile picture
kdeanc 🇺🇲1 year ago

Sounds like Dr. Scott Gottlieb is trying to protect his pharma overlords.

Triathlon Dad's profile picture
Triathlon Dad1 year ago

F Gottlieb. He works for Pfizer. Of course he's worried about RFK. No surprise there.

JesseJacksonPink's profile picture
JesseJacksonPink1 year ago

What a horrible man

SW Gal's profile picture
SW Gal1 year ago

Evil Fook talking

Rev. Steve Mac's profile picture
Rev. Steve Mac1 year ago

That’s how you know he’s the right pick

legallady4's profile picture
legallady41 year ago

Gottlieb is terrified of his legal liability for lying…

Phaedrus's profile picture
Phaedrus1 year ago

I will not listen to a guy that looks like melting plastic

Brainsurfing's profile picture
Brainsurfing1 year ago

His eye movements look odd. Is this AI?

Phoeli𝕏's profile picture
Phoeli𝕏1 year ago

Obligations attached to selling medical goods or services, are heightened when there are potential outcomes of death or injury. Exigency may justify temporary waiver of exhaustive safety research protocols, but NEVER permit deliberate concealment or deception.

Bob Ross's profile picture
Bob Ross1 year ago

@marketmodel I do not give a rats ass about cost. I do care about safety

Baaaaaa's profile picture
Baaaaaa1 year ago

Both of these are great ideas. Who in their right mind would inject ANY product for which a mfgr. has NO LIABILITY WHAT SO EVER??? And the preservative is mercury based: A heavy metal which is also poison, and accumulates in the body.

Related Videos

"We don't know if [any] vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine... [none of them have] been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility." This clip of board-certified primary care physician Dr. Jeffrey Barke (Dr. Jeff Barke) is taken from a podcast episode of The Counter Culture Mom Show (Tina Griffin) posted to Rumble on May 12, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "My push is really to educate, to give informed consent that isn't otherwise usually given. And the FDA package insert that's required by every vaccine, by every drug, by the way, has a standardized format, and it takes a while. And it took a while for me to teach myself how to read this package insert. "But they're all standardized. So, for example, section 13.1 that every parent should be aware of for childhood vaccines says the following. And I'm literally reading from the package insert. This vaccine is Vaxelis, which is insane. It has six vaccines in one, but nonetheless, they all read the same. So 13.1 says, quote, Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility. Translation, we don't know if this vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine. "Again, I'm not telling you that you shouldn't get this product, but what I am saying is you should be aware of this. You should also be aware of what the ingredients are in the vaccine. You should be aware of what the studies are that brought the product to market. "Most people, Tina, don't realize that not a single childhood vaccine that's on the CDC schedule and approved by the FDA has ever been tested against a placebo and inert placebo in a randomized control trial. Not a single one of them. Why do you think that is? And if you're listening to this and you're like, you're crazy, that's not true. It actually is true. And the reason why that is, is the FDA has a very different level of scrutiny to bring vaccines to the market versus bringing drugs to the market. "So all these vaccines have come to the market, especially after the act that was passed in the mid-1980s that gave the manufacturers of these vaccines liability protection. So if you're injured by one of these vaccines, you have no recourse against the manufacturer. Once that liability protection was enacted, then the vaccine schedule exploded. And it makes sense. There's no downside. There's only upside down. They make a boatload of money. They have no risk, they have no liability. You can't sue the vaccine company. "And it's said for every new vaccine that's added to the CDC childhood vaccine schedule, that is a 1 billion with a B dollar annuity for that vaccine company. They don't have to advertise. CDC does it for them. They don't have any liability. So it's money in their pocket. And. And what incentive do the vaccine companies have to be extra sure that the product that they're injecting into our children is safe and effective if they have no downside liability. So again, get it or don't get it, but only after informed consent. Only after you know the details of what's in the package insert."

Sense Receptor

22,703 views • 1 year ago