Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Dr. Steven Greer: "We can use technology to pull in Aliens & Creatures from other dimensions" đ˝ âI know guys whoâve been in laboratories where they have a toroid or one of these devices, and suddenly theyâre pulling in spooky looking creatures. It looked like they came out of... show more
61,506 Aufrufe ⢠vor 3 Tagen â˘via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
![[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) đ¤ Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not đ¤ The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2064130794973774042/amplify_video_thumb/2063015130917732352/img/1I_Up7yZ_LcHIuXv.jpg)
![Dr. Steven Greer, founder of the Disclosure Project: The new Age of Disclosure movie is a deliberate psychological warfare effort to cover up man-made UAP activity and prime the public for a fake alien invasion designed to unite the world under a "totalitarian fascist regime". "I gave up my medical career... [to avert] this juggernaut that Wernher von Braunâwho invented the rocketâwarned about, and that is that we were going to create an alien threat from space so that the world would unite under some sort of totalitarian fascist regime." "And I think this movie is actually sort of the final warning bell that that's what's going to be coming in 2026 and 2027 if we don't wake up." "This is coming up very quickly. And I think the public needs to be aware of that." Credit: Dr. Steven Greer](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1994719351920804290/amplify_video_thumb/1994719237097537536/img/r-CH4GL-shuUZJwP.jpg)
!["Sometimes [the phenomenon] presents itself in like a non-corporeal form, too: Orbs, balls of energy." ~Grusch "Itâs not out of the question that aliens could be hiding here in a shadow biome." ~Eric Davis ~ Grusch: "There is a real phenomenon that...origin undetermined, but it's trippy. And sometimes it presents itself in like a non-corporeal form, too: Orbs, balls of energy. They'll appear as like, some kind of bipedal hominid, like some people have espoused." (See the Skinwalker Ranch incident where a Bigfoot-like creature allegedly climbed out what appeared to be some type of portal tunnel. Or cases Stan Gordon investigated where a physical craft was seen, along with Bigfoot-like creatures and orbs. Or Bigfoot turning into orbs. đľâđŤ You think people wanna report such a thing?) Grusch: "So, I think that might be...call it interdimensional, call it shadow biome, cryptoterrestrial. I mean, there's a lot of different theories." (Here's Dr. Eric Davis on what the phenomenon may represent. And he touches on a shadow biome.) Davis: "I have a personal theory and my boss (Hal Puthoff) has a different one. Iâll give you mine. I believe that they are alien. Whether theyâre extraterrestrial, that remains to be seen. But if theyâre interdimensionalâŚwhether theyâre extraterrestrial in an interdimensional fashion or not extraterrestrial in an interdimensional fashion is irrelevant. The fact is, if theyâre traveling through dimensions, theyâve got a home somewhere. Now where that home is, we donât know. It may not even be on the Earth. It could be on the Earth and theyâre moving through dimensions that we donât have access to, technologically. So itâs very possible. I mean, itâs not out of the question that aliens could be hiding here in a shadow biome. "Dr. Paul Davies at theâŚI donât remember the name of his foundation at Arizona State University â he published two papers in Acta Astronautica back in the late 2000s on this very subject. He said, 'We should be looking at the Moon, we should be doing archeology on the Moon or archaeology on the Earth to look for ancient-alien artifacts, technological artifacts that were left behind after a visitation on the Earth.' Now heâs thinking in terms of two hundred million years ago, not in terms of UFOs of today, because UFOs are explosive language. Itâs got the bad, cultural connotation associated with this topic. So, heâs avoiding that as a good, conservative scientist that he is. Heâs actually a pioneer in quantum field theory and curved, space-time physics, which is the precursor to quantum gravity. So heâs in the SETI business now, Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. And what he was talking about in his papers was called Search for Extraterrestrial Artifacts, like archeological technology, artifacts like ancient-Egyptian equipment and things like that, artwork and whatnot. So, itâs very possible that theyâre here and theyâve been living here. Or, theyâre visiting here." ~ And here's Davis explaining interdimensional in a message to me... "Interdimensional is speculation but itâs widely referring to the potential for different planes of existence that humans havenât discovered or cannot sense. There is the possibility of life that exists outside of human visual and auditory ranges which an NHI might exist within but this is not in another number of dimensions that differ from our own." ~Dr. Eric W. Davis](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2072751081772429433/amplify_video_thumb/2072746592902496256/img/cVOOzMyV_GOyg-hn.jpg)
![đ˝ Is The UFO Phenomenon "Attacking" Us and We Just Don't Realize It? đ˝ "We're not seeing any aggression right now [from the UFO Phenomenon." ~Mellon "They might have been attacking us for centuries already...through the manipulation of consciousness." ~Levenda (IMO, this is a very limited view of things from Mellon. I'll include more from Levenda after this short transcript.) Christopher K. Mellon: "The research that I've seen - it was quite a while ago, but - makes the logical point that a great deal of the reaction [and] impact will depend on the context. So, let's assume for a moment that things continue as they have been, which is, no aggression, no hostility, surveillance, whatever. A presence, an elusive presence. "That will be received, likely fairly, with less concern and disruption, obviously, than if it was a, you know, 'Independence-Day' scenario. I mean, we don't anticipate...we're not seeing any aggression right now. We have concerns about the seeming interest in DOD facilities, but we're not seeing any kind of hostility. This has been going on for a long, long time. Chances are it'll probably continue more or less as it has, which isn't disrupting or Earth-threatening." (All of that, apparent, interest in our DOD facilities and surveillance, may be misdirection from what the phenomenon is actually doing here. That MUST be considered.) Leslie Kean: "Yeah, that's a really good point. And I think it also depends on what is actually said when the announcement is made, and also what kind of proof is presented. Because they're gonna have to offer something to really prove that this is not just...that this is the real deal." ~~~ (IMO, this is the way we SHOULD look at the phenomenon, and this essay is a big reason why I value Peter Levenda's opinion so highly. I can't recommend it enough and I'll link to the entire thing in the replies.) Levenda: "If people insist on projecting their ideas about humans and human incentives onto the 'alien' and claiming (a) that the 'alien' has no designs on us and only comes in peace, or (b) that since the 'alien' has not attacked us so far even though they could have, easily, then their intentions must be peaceful ⌠etc etc; these are all points of view that are inconsistent with what we do know. By definition, the 'alien' should not be considered 'human' in the sense we understand that term. We have no idea what environment gave rise to the 'alien', what its values are, how it views us. We donât know what is important to them, and we donât know what or how they think about what is important to us. We keep projecting our (21st century North American) ideas, concepts, and conceits onto a Phenomenon about which we know virtually nothing. Ironically, the less we know about It the easier that projection becomes. We accept that their technology is somehow superior to ours, without being able to define 'superior' in that context, instead of just 'other'. Some of us assume that if the 'alien' has superior technology then it must be spiritually or morally superior as well. When has that ever been the case on this planet in all of our recorded history? Technologically advanced civilizations routinely invade, colonize, and brutalize less advanced ones. Thus, we have no expectation â based purely on our own experience as human beings of planet Earth â that another race would be benign. In fact, we would have to anticipate the worst. "A better approach might be to ascertain whether the 'alien' is hostile rather than 'evil': hostile to all humans, hostile to some humans, hostile to other life forms on our planet, etc. There are those who insist that this cannot be the case, that if they are hostile they would have wiped us out already. We have already addressed that argument above, but briefly: we canât assume that they would act the way we have acted in our history. Their life expectancy, timelines and schedules might be extremely long compared to ours. Or extremely short. We simply donât know and should not assume anything. "Hostility implies intent: that they 'intend' to destroy us somehow. They have not done so, the argument goes, so they must not be hostile. The problem with this argument is that we are assuming they would manifest their hostility by blowing something up, or attacking us the way we attack and invade our enemies. They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them and which further an agenda we canât begin to imagine or understand. "What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? That sounds far-fetched, but we have been doing that ourselves for a long time. Itâs called psychological warfare, and includes propaganda, disinformation, misinformation, etc. including â again ironically â using the UFO Phenomenon as a means of distracting us from our own secret weapons systems. "Many contactees report communication with the 'alien' by means of telepathy. That automatically presents us with the possibility that human consciousness may be vulnerable to direct outside interference or manipulation by the 'alien.' "We are simply not trying hard enough to understand the 'alien'. "We must proceed on the assumption that the Phenomenon is dangerous to us (perhaps in ways we canât imagine, and I canât stress that enough) and proceed slowly and carefully."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2066619407313535002/amplify_video_thumb/2066608049394229249/img/ooi6sxiOAQX769aG.jpg)
![I added a lot to this transcript and I'm not happy right now.. A Non-Human Intelligence on this Planet? "We're not aware of anything along that line that's ever been hidden from Congress" ~Rounds "I really don't believe that that is necessarily what's happened here." ~Rounds "We haven't seen that yet. It's not something that any of us have been able to, that I've been able to identify. I'm not aware of any of it." ~Rounds ~ Ross Coulthart: "If it turns out that, for example, the United States has recovered, incredibly, non-human technology, perhaps even craft and bodies, biologics, as some people assert. If that's true, and that has not been properly disclosed to Congress, and yet, by all accounts, billions, perhaps trillions of dollars have been expended on such a program, do you see any reason why on national security grounds that ought not to be disclosed to the public? That's the key issue. I mean, are you guys gonna cave at the last minute and say, 'Well, if we do have a flying saucer in a cave, it should not be revealed to the public for national security reasons.' Can you see any reason why that wouldn't be allowed to be revealed?" (That is THE question. Like I said the other day, Ross asks good questions and this is the one I really wanted him to ask.) Rounds: "Well, there are two items here. You do have a hypothetical. We're not aware of anything along that line that's ever been hidden from Congress, directly that we're aware of." (Have any witnesses made that claim? If so, how many? Look at how different Marco Rubio responded during his interview with Joe Khalil. Rubio: "Either, what [Grusch] is saying is partially true or entirely true, or...we have some really smart, educated people with high clearances and very important positions in our government, who are crazy, and are leading us on a goose chase." ~Senator Marco Rubio Full interview transcript: (What does Rounds think about Grusch or the other folks Grusch says have gone to the IG and who allegedly have hands-on experience with these NHI craft? Has Rounds heard form them?) ~ Rounds: "Also, the second part of it is, is we don't know if there was something out there, was it actually disclosed to some members of Congress who have continued to keep it quiet based upon their concerns about the release? We don't know it." (In 2002, Admiral Wilson told Dr. Eric Davis that politicians were NOT on the list of folks who were read in, or given access, to the alleged crash retrieval program. If that has changed, and certain members of Congress HAVE been read in, that doesn't change the fact that THE WORLD DESERVES TO KNOW if we share this planet with another intelligence. Stop using the, "It might be our tech" excuse.) Rounds: "So it really is a series of hypotheticals that you're asking me." (We all know that. That's why Ross phrased the question like that.) Rounds: "But let me continue on, because I think really, if I could put it in a simpler way... Let's just say that there had been a meeting or a contact with something that we didn't believe was from this world. Whether, you know, from another country, or from our own resources. At that point, you know, I think there's gonna come a time here in which the American public and people from around the world are gonna look at it and say, 'You know, it really would be crazy for us to believe that we really were alone in the world, or in the Universe, and that there is no other intelligent life form out there." (If what we're dealing with are extraterrestrials from another planet, I agree that the masses could say, "No shit! Not a surprise!' But what if it's something that doesn't have a physical body? As George Knapp has asked : What if they can see us but we can't see them, and they can watch us when we're in the bathroom or taking a shower? How would people handle that? Or, if they're time travelers from our future, back here to save us from some sort of cataclysm? Would that cause panic? Or, even if they were "just" extraterrestrials. Would people be able to handle Reptilians who might find human meat a delicacy, or Mantid beings who look like giant bugs? As Christopher K. Mellon said in 2015: "John Podesta said publicly, the American people can handle the truth. My question would beâŚif you donât know what the truth is, how do you know they can handle it? What if theyâre flesh-eating arachnids or something? Doesnât seem to make sense to meâ ~Mellon ~ Rounds: "But it would be a matter of how you would disclose it correctly, and in what would be one of the greatest announcements in the history of mankind, that we are not alone." (Is it the job of politicians or governments to withhold information until they figure out the proper way to disclose it? What if the information is scary and could cause panic? Would any government have a right to withhold that information from the people? I say, hell no.) Rounds: "I really don't believe that that is necessarily what's happened here. But, we do know - and this is the part that is so sensitive to us - there are some things that we can't explain out there." (Seems like we're back to square one. Holy shit.) Rounds "And that's the reason why I really got involved in this in the first place, is, if we know that there are technologies there that appear to do things that physically, we're just not sure how it's getting done. Biggest concern I had was, is it ours? Or does it belong to somebody else on this earth, one of our adversaries? Or is it really something that is out of this world? But in any of those events, two of the three would be very serious if we disclosed it to the American public because it would mean national defense issues are being broached. And that would be, it would be one of our adversaries' capabilities, or one of our own capabilities." (In other words, it may appear to be a technology from a non-human intelligence but we have to make triple sure it's not from an adversary or our own tech!!! There's always that chance! OMG! It seems like that will always be the excuse for not disclosing.) Rounds: "The third alternative, which I wouldn't be afraid of seeing some day... (Some day? That sounds far away. When? 2040? 2050?) Rounds: "But it can't. It can't. We haven't seen that yet. It's not something that any of us have been able to, that I've been able to identify. I'm not aware of any of it. But I know that there are things that we don't know how to identify today. Does that help?" (We've known that for a long time.) Ross: "It does, sir, it does." (It doesn't really help.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1939860994362417670/amplify_video_thumb/1939849275040473088/img/qMDMdsC4F-7B-RSa.jpg)
![Whitney Webb on 15-minute cities: "The goal [is] to have people... corralled [so] they're easily surveilled and controlled." "[They would] share... apartments when [they're] not there." "[They would] lose... car ownership, [so they] can't really control where [they] go." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So I haven't written extensively about 15- minute cities, but I would argue that the goal, there is basically to have people more or less corralled into an area where they're easily surveilled and controlled. And that's basically the... interest here is how do a small few rule the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or do anything about it. "Ultimately, this ruling system that they've been attempting to impose on, on people really around the world, because this is a global governance project at the end of the day, is, you know, using Big Tech tools in, in mass surveillance to basically create an entirely new way of life and system of living. "Part of that is to basically reduce the share of what the many, i.e., the 99% or whatever, have. So, you know, a lot of this, you know, became extremely, you know, unpopular. But also like people learned about it during the COVID era because of, you know, these groups like the World Economic Forum, which by the way, bills itself, is the premier promoter of public-private partnerships, that, you know, we need to not own our cars, we need to, rent them. And there should be autonomous fleets of Ubers that drive everyone around a specific radius. We shouldn't own homes. We should, you know, rent apartments and then share those apartments when we're not there and we leave, someone else can occupy the space. "These were all things, that were promoted under the guise, you know, of, of sustainability and other things at the time. But they're actively being, you know, designed and acted upon. "Actually one of the Columbus smart city initiatives that's connected to this Columbus partnership that that Wexner ran. He chaired it basically from 2001, I think, until 2021. So like 20 years, including when this was created. Columbus got a huge Department of Transportation grant from the government and also, you know, funding from private individuals, probably Wexner, but who knows, to to basically create a new system that in Columbus where private car ownership would not exist. "It would be fleets of, you know, smart cars, autonomous cars that drive people around. And so if you lose private car ownership, you can't really control where you go. And so these cars would determine, you know, would. Would have specific routes that you could, you know, pay to use and what have you. "And, interestingly enough, this was actually a goal for the entire United States, described in this by this national Security Commission on AI which was chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google and had a lot of these same Big Tech guys, who's who are have major roles at companies with New Albany data centers. "They basically said that in order for the US they said to beat China in AI it was necessary to end private car ownership in the United States and instead have autonomous, you know, Waymos, basically, drive every, fleets of them, Uber everybody around to where they were supposed to go and have things you know, sort of planned out by AI. Like where people are going, where people are working and all of this. "So the Technocracy Inc. model that you highlighted earlier, you know it was really influenced by things like Taylorism and a lot of these schools of thought that came out of the Industrial revolution that prioritize efficiency above all else. You know, having the trains run on time and all of that stuff being you know the kind of obsession of of these people in that particular era. "And so they want to sort of apply that not just to industry but to micromanaging people's lives as they you know, extract and exploit us for data and how much money our serf-like lives will make for them."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2038319939497709608/amplify_video_thumb/2038316420845711360/img/_jjyJy6vXOx4xQkj.jpg)
