Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Dr. Suzanne Humphries exposed a suppressed 2008 Swedish study on infants given their routine vaccines at 3 and 5 months. Researchers drew blood and exposed it to whooping cough toxin and analyzed genetic changes just 12 hours later revealing widespread activation of disease-linked pathways in these vulnerable babies. This... show more

Bridgett Fertig

125,047 subscribers

17,978 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 2

Фото профиля NWRain-Judi

NWRain-Judi8 дней назад

Parents need to research before allowing their kids to be vaccinated.

Фото профиля Connie Saint Lady

Connie Saint Lady8 дней назад

So, so, so DISGUSTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! STop ALL OF THE JABS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! @RobertKennedyJc @CDC @USDA

Похожие видео

📣 Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers the TRUTH about whooping cough and the DTaP vax: “The people that have been primed with this acellular vaccine are the ones that are going to continue to interrupt herd immunity until that population is gone.” “What we see is that those children that are the most susceptible in terms of dying or hospitalization are now the most susceptible to the actual bacteria because we have skewed the immunity in the population.” “... older children that were vaccinated will develop whooping cough again. Or if they're vaccinated a lot, they might not cough, but they'll colonize their lung surfaces and be able to spread the bacteria asymptomatically.” “We have created an absolute disaster situation with these vaccines.” Dr Suzanne Humphries

📣 Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers the TRUTH about whooping cough and the DTaP vax: “The people that have been primed with this acellular vaccine are the ones that are going to continue to interrupt herd immunity until that population is gone.” “What we see is that those children that are the most susceptible in terms of dying or hospitalization are now the most susceptible to the actual bacteria because we have skewed the immunity in the population.” “... older children that were vaccinated will develop whooping cough again. Or if they're vaccinated a lot, they might not cough, but they'll colonize their lung surfaces and be able to spread the bacteria asymptomatically.” “We have created an absolute disaster situation with these vaccines.” Dr Suzanne Humphries

Children’s Health Defense

56,646 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a renowned microbiologist and immunologist, is issuing a dire warning to humanity about the dangers of mRNA vaccines. He claims that the integration of foreign genes into human chromosomes through these vaccines poses catastrophic risks—not only to individuals but to future generations. According to Dr. Bhakdi, the introduction of bacterial plasmids and foreign DNA into human cells via mRNA vaccines is a reckless experiment that could lead to permanent genetic alterations. "Any foreign gene integrated into your chromosome can trigger cancer immediately, cause widespread cellular dysfunction, and be passed down to your offspring," Dr. Bhakdi warns. He emphasizes that once these genetic changes occur, they are irreversible, transforming the very blueprint of human biology. Every cell altered by these foreign genes, he argues, is "doomed," setting the stage for unpredictable and potentially devastating health consequences. Dr. Bhakdi asserts that global health authorities like the WHO, CDC, and FDA are pushing these vaccines without fully acknowledging their risks. He points to the presence of bacterial-derived plasmids in mRNA vaccines, which he claims can infiltrate human cells and wreak havoc on genetic stability. This, he says, is not a theoretical concern but a reality already unfolding with the rollout of these vaccines worldwide. This is not a message of fear but a call to awareness. Dr. Bhakdi urges people to question the narrative, demand transparency, and protect their health and future generations from what he describes as a dangerous overreach by global health institutions. "We are at a crossroads," he declares. "The genetic integrity of humanity is at stake."

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a renowned microbiologist and immunologist, is issuing a dire warning to humanity about the dangers of mRNA vaccines. He claims that the integration of foreign genes into human chromosomes through these vaccines poses catastrophic risks—not only to individuals but to future generations. According to Dr. Bhakdi, the introduction of bacterial plasmids and foreign DNA into human cells via mRNA vaccines is a reckless experiment that could lead to permanent genetic alterations. "Any foreign gene integrated into your chromosome can trigger cancer immediately, cause widespread cellular dysfunction, and be passed down to your offspring," Dr. Bhakdi warns. He emphasizes that once these genetic changes occur, they are irreversible, transforming the very blueprint of human biology. Every cell altered by these foreign genes, he argues, is "doomed," setting the stage for unpredictable and potentially devastating health consequences. Dr. Bhakdi asserts that global health authorities like the WHO, CDC, and FDA are pushing these vaccines without fully acknowledging their risks. He points to the presence of bacterial-derived plasmids in mRNA vaccines, which he claims can infiltrate human cells and wreak havoc on genetic stability. This, he says, is not a theoretical concern but a reality already unfolding with the rollout of these vaccines worldwide. This is not a message of fear but a call to awareness. Dr. Bhakdi urges people to question the narrative, demand transparency, and protect their health and future generations from what he describes as a dangerous overreach by global health institutions. "We are at a crossroads," he declares. "The genetic integrity of humanity is at stake."

Camus

56,601 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 “There are NO saline placebo-controlled studies looking at the hepatitis B vaccine risk given to day-old newborns.” “Why?” “Here’s what you’ll be told by the… so-called authorities.” Dr. Suzanne Humphries exposes the excuses for why vaccines can’t be properly safety tested: “We’re told that it’s unethical to do a saline placebo study now because the safety was long ago established.” “Hepatitis B vaccines that we’re using today were licensed based on immunogenicity.” “[They’ve done] some short-term safety monitoring for a few days in some uber-healthy infants and a small group of premature, low birth weight infants for sure.” “[They’ve done] comparisons that sometimes used aluminum-containing placebos or other controls rather than pure saline.” “And we know that this is a common practice… by supposed vaccine scientists to use another vaccine that contains an inflammatory agent.” “They say because it will make it less obvious who received the placebo.” “And the other reason is ‘we don’t want to deprive the placebo group from something beneficial.’” “What a riot.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

🚨 “There are NO saline placebo-controlled studies looking at the hepatitis B vaccine risk given to day-old newborns.” “Why?” “Here’s what you’ll be told by the… so-called authorities.” Dr. Suzanne Humphries exposes the excuses for why vaccines can’t be properly safety tested: “We’re told that it’s unethical to do a saline placebo study now because the safety was long ago established.” “Hepatitis B vaccines that we’re using today were licensed based on immunogenicity.” “[They’ve done] some short-term safety monitoring for a few days in some uber-healthy infants and a small group of premature, low birth weight infants for sure.” “[They’ve done] comparisons that sometimes used aluminum-containing placebos or other controls rather than pure saline.” “And we know that this is a common practice… by supposed vaccine scientists to use another vaccine that contains an inflammatory agent.” “They say because it will make it less obvious who received the placebo.” “And the other reason is ‘we don’t want to deprive the placebo group from something beneficial.’” “What a riot.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

Children’s Health Defense

30,321 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🧪 What’s really inside your child’s Hepatitis B vaccine? Dr. Suzanne Humphries just broke down the truth. Every new parent needs to hear this: “The Engerix vaccine from [GSK] contains 10 micrograms of antigen.” “It is made on yeast cells… programmed to produce the antigen.” “It has aluminum hydroxide, and it contains trace amounts of formaldehyde.” “It’s not listed as an excipient even though it has it.” “And this is supposed to be given on day one of birth to hours-old newborns if they’re premature.” “There will be 3 or more injections in infancy or childhood if that baby is immature.” “Because they say that first vaccine doesn’t count in low birth weight infants.” “The day-of-birth vaccine never counts towards the schedule and will still be given at one, two, three, and six months for those high-risk babies.” “In normal birth weight [and] low-risk infants, that first jab does count towards the total of 3 vaccines, but they’re usually given 4 anyway.” “The other vaccine is from Merck, and it is called Recombivax.” “It contains 5 micrograms of antigen.” “The FDA [treats them as] interchangeable even though one has more antigen than the other.” “So what I find really interesting about the Merck vaccine is that it actually contains 7.5 micrograms of formaldehyde.” “Which is greater than the 5 micrograms of actual antigen that’s in the vaccine.” “Yet we’re told that none of that matters, because your own body makes formaldehyde.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

🧪 What’s really inside your child’s Hepatitis B vaccine? Dr. Suzanne Humphries just broke down the truth. Every new parent needs to hear this: “The Engerix vaccine from [GSK] contains 10 micrograms of antigen.” “It is made on yeast cells… programmed to produce the antigen.” “It has aluminum hydroxide, and it contains trace amounts of formaldehyde.” “It’s not listed as an excipient even though it has it.” “And this is supposed to be given on day one of birth to hours-old newborns if they’re premature.” “There will be 3 or more injections in infancy or childhood if that baby is immature.” “Because they say that first vaccine doesn’t count in low birth weight infants.” “The day-of-birth vaccine never counts towards the schedule and will still be given at one, two, three, and six months for those high-risk babies.” “In normal birth weight [and] low-risk infants, that first jab does count towards the total of 3 vaccines, but they’re usually given 4 anyway.” “The other vaccine is from Merck, and it is called Recombivax.” “It contains 5 micrograms of antigen.” “The FDA [treats them as] interchangeable even though one has more antigen than the other.” “So what I find really interesting about the Merck vaccine is that it actually contains 7.5 micrograms of formaldehyde.” “Which is greater than the 5 micrograms of actual antigen that’s in the vaccine.” “Yet we’re told that none of that matters, because your own body makes formaldehyde.” Dr Suzanne Humphries CHDTV Live

Children’s Health Defense

19,214 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a damning verdict on vaccination: they have never been, are not, and can never be safe. She argues the very process defies natural immune function, forcing it into an unnatural balance that increases susceptibility beyond the targeted disease. Injecting disease matter combined with unknown chemicals and adjuvants directly into muscle cannot be safe. She challenges the "miraculous" narrative, pointing to historical evidence of vaccine injury, from smallpox deaths to severe ulcerations in previously healthy infants. Those who witness this harm are dismissed as "mad," while the true drivers are money and power. The schedule forcing 24+ disease injections into infants under 6 months is an assault on a slowly developing, perfectly designed immune system. This natural design is protected by breast milk, not flawed and in need of pharmaceutical correction. The addition of aluminum to provoke a stronger response in a baby's deliberately blunted immune system abolishes its natural state, creating hyperreactivity. This, she concludes, is the root of our epidemic of asthma, severe allergies, and reactive airway disease—a direct result of unnaturally shifting the immune system's fundamental balance.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a damning verdict on vaccination: they have never been, are not, and can never be safe. She argues the very process defies natural immune function, forcing it into an unnatural balance that increases susceptibility beyond the targeted disease. Injecting disease matter combined with unknown chemicals and adjuvants directly into muscle cannot be safe. She challenges the "miraculous" narrative, pointing to historical evidence of vaccine injury, from smallpox deaths to severe ulcerations in previously healthy infants. Those who witness this harm are dismissed as "mad," while the true drivers are money and power. The schedule forcing 24+ disease injections into infants under 6 months is an assault on a slowly developing, perfectly designed immune system. This natural design is protected by breast milk, not flawed and in need of pharmaceutical correction. The addition of aluminum to provoke a stronger response in a baby's deliberately blunted immune system abolishes its natural state, creating hyperreactivity. This, she concludes, is the root of our epidemic of asthma, severe allergies, and reactive airway disease—a direct result of unnaturally shifting the immune system's fundamental balance.

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

17,918 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a damning verdict on vaccination: they have never been, are not, and can never be safe. She argues the very process defies natural immune function, forcing it into an unnatural balance that increases susceptibility beyond the targeted disease. Injecting disease matter combined with unknown chemicals and adjuvants directly into muscle cannot be safe. She challenges the "miraculous" narrative, pointing to historical evidence of vaccine injury, from smallpox deaths to severe ulcerations in previously healthy infants. Those who witness this harm are dismissed as "mad," while the true drivers are money and power. The schedule forcing 24+ disease injections into infants under 6 months is an assault on a slowly developing, perfectly designed immune system. This natural design is protected by breast milk, not flawed and in need of pharmaceutical correction. The addition of aluminum to provoke a stronger response in a baby's deliberately blunted immune system abolishes its natural state, creating hyperreactivity. This, she concludes, is the root of our epidemic of asthma, severe allergies, and reactive airway disease—a direct result of unnaturally shifting the immune system's fundamental balance.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a damning verdict on vaccination: they have never been, are not, and can never be safe. She argues the very process defies natural immune function, forcing it into an unnatural balance that increases susceptibility beyond the targeted disease. Injecting disease matter combined with unknown chemicals and adjuvants directly into muscle cannot be safe. She challenges the "miraculous" narrative, pointing to historical evidence of vaccine injury, from smallpox deaths to severe ulcerations in previously healthy infants. Those who witness this harm are dismissed as "mad," while the true drivers are money and power. The schedule forcing 24+ disease injections into infants under 6 months is an assault on a slowly developing, perfectly designed immune system. This natural design is protected by breast milk, not flawed and in need of pharmaceutical correction. The addition of aluminum to provoke a stronger response in a baby's deliberately blunted immune system abolishes its natural state, creating hyperreactivity. This, she concludes, is the root of our epidemic of asthma, severe allergies, and reactive airway disease—a direct result of unnaturally shifting the immune system's fundamental balance.

Camus

144,679 просмотров • 1 год назад

Smoke, Mirrors and the “Disappearance” of Polio. A presentation by Suzanne Humphries, MD. As a nephrologist, Suzanne was treating patients and noticed several had kidney failure seemingly out of no where. They all had one thing in common, they were recently vaccinated with the flu vaccine. When she brought her concerns to her colleagues she was dismissed but she knew something was wrong and decided to look into it herself. This sent her on a journey to find out the truth about what was going on. She searched historical records, much that has been buried and she was shocked by what she discovered about the history of vaccines and infectious disease. This presentation focuses on polio but her book Dissolving Illusions outlines a hidden history of disease, an alternative to what we have all been told over and over again. That vaccines saved the modern world of the scourge of disease, a convenient story governments, scientists and pharmaceuticals love to tell in order to maintain their monopoly on the “truth” i.e. profit. Well if you haven’t figured it out yet, governments, scientists, and pharmaceuticals companies, as much as they want you to believe it, are not paragons of beneficence. In most cases, they are the source of human misery and an close examination of history proves this and that is exactly what Suzanne has done.

Smoke, Mirrors and the “Disappearance” of Polio. A presentation by Suzanne Humphries, MD. As a nephrologist, Suzanne was treating patients and noticed several had kidney failure seemingly out of no where. They all had one thing in common, they were recently vaccinated with the flu vaccine. When she brought her concerns to her colleagues she was dismissed but she knew something was wrong and decided to look into it herself. This sent her on a journey to find out the truth about what was going on. She searched historical records, much that has been buried and she was shocked by what she discovered about the history of vaccines and infectious disease. This presentation focuses on polio but her book Dissolving Illusions outlines a hidden history of disease, an alternative to what we have all been told over and over again. That vaccines saved the modern world of the scourge of disease, a convenient story governments, scientists and pharmaceuticals love to tell in order to maintain their monopoly on the “truth” i.e. profit. Well if you haven’t figured it out yet, governments, scientists, and pharmaceuticals companies, as much as they want you to believe it, are not paragons of beneficence. In most cases, they are the source of human misery and an close examination of history proves this and that is exactly what Suzanne has done.

Champagne Joshi

640,273 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Dr. Mary Megson, a developmental pediatrician, testified about children who were developing perfectly normal UNTIL receiving school-age vaccines. She explains that the MMR vaccine at 15 months depletes the body's vitamin A, and when combined with DPT, many children completely "disconnect" from reality, turning into an entirely different child as damage occurs to the blood-brain barrier and toxin excretion pathways. Dr. Megson says she TREATS these vaccine damaged children with natural lipid-soluble vitamin A from cod liver oil to bypass blocked protein pathways. She says within days, many of these precious children regain eye contact and focus. After 2 months, a single dose of bethenicol leads to dramatic connections in her office as children look at her, talk, act out, use advanced vocabulary, far exceeding their lack of activity prior to receiving toxic vaccines. We need to be asking some serious questions about vaccine impacts on vulnerable kids and why simple, natural solutions appear to reverse vaccine damages in some cases. Of course Big Pharma won't touch this. They profit for DECADES off of our vaccine injured children as problems snowball into handfuls of dangerous medications later on in life. 😡

Dr. Mary Megson, a developmental pediatrician, testified about children who were developing perfectly normal UNTIL receiving school-age vaccines. She explains that the MMR vaccine at 15 months depletes the body's vitamin A, and when combined with DPT, many children completely "disconnect" from reality, turning into an entirely different child as damage occurs to the blood-brain barrier and toxin excretion pathways. Dr. Megson says she TREATS these vaccine damaged children with natural lipid-soluble vitamin A from cod liver oil to bypass blocked protein pathways. She says within days, many of these precious children regain eye contact and focus. After 2 months, a single dose of bethenicol leads to dramatic connections in her office as children look at her, talk, act out, use advanced vocabulary, far exceeding their lack of activity prior to receiving toxic vaccines. We need to be asking some serious questions about vaccine impacts on vulnerable kids and why simple, natural solutions appear to reverse vaccine damages in some cases. Of course Big Pharma won't touch this. They profit for DECADES off of our vaccine injured children as problems snowball into handfuls of dangerous medications later on in life. 😡

Bridgett Fertig

87,396 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

RFK Jr. just exposed the insanity of giving newborns the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. “There are two hepatitis vaccines, and one of them had a safety study that lasted for four days.” “It was on 143 kids… a product that's going to be given to 76 million kids.” “The risk profile for babies prior to the introduction of the vaccine from hepatitis B, was one in seven million.” “That means you need to give 7 million hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,346,726 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, MD: “VACCINES HAVE NEVER BEEN SAFE — AND THEY NEVER WILL BE!” “Vaccinations have NEVER been safe. Never has there been a safe vaccine. Never will there be a safe vaccine. It is NOT possible to have a safe vaccine.” The entire process defies the natural function of the immune system. You’re injecting disease matter + toxic chemicals, antibiotics, aluminum, mercury (Thimerosal), formaldehyde, Polysorbate 80, aborted fetal DNA, animal cells and dozens of other poisons directly into a baby’s muscle. If you fed these ingredients to your child at home, you’d be arrested for child abuse. Yet the government pushes 72+ shots on infants at “well-child” visits and calls it “safe & effective.” The vaccinated children were the sickest. Perfect babies developed terrible ulcerations, diseases, and died after smallpox shots. Today the same pattern continues — but we’re told we’re “too stupid” to notice the damage. It’s not science. It’s money and power. Parents: Your baby’s immune system is being thwarted and left vulnerable for life.

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, MD: “VACCINES HAVE NEVER BEEN SAFE — AND THEY NEVER WILL BE!” “Vaccinations have NEVER been safe. Never has there been a safe vaccine. Never will there be a safe vaccine. It is NOT possible to have a safe vaccine.” The entire process defies the natural function of the immune system. You’re injecting disease matter + toxic chemicals, antibiotics, aluminum, mercury (Thimerosal), formaldehyde, Polysorbate 80, aborted fetal DNA, animal cells and dozens of other poisons directly into a baby’s muscle. If you fed these ingredients to your child at home, you’d be arrested for child abuse. Yet the government pushes 72+ shots on infants at “well-child” visits and calls it “safe & effective.” The vaccinated children were the sickest. Perfect babies developed terrible ulcerations, diseases, and died after smallpox shots. Today the same pattern continues — but we’re told we’re “too stupid” to notice the damage. It’s not science. It’s money and power. Parents: Your baby’s immune system is being thwarted and left vulnerable for life.

Valerie Anne Smith

32,747 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.

Camus

23,556 просмотров • 1 год назад

DISTURBING: It’s no longer a theory. A new study has confirmed devastating genetic damage caused by the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including the activation of cancer-causing genes and breakdowns in the immune system. The study, titled “Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation,” reveals how these mRNA injections disrupt thousands of vital genes. Using advanced RNA sequencing, scientists uncovered mitochondrial failure, immune system reprogramming, and oncogenic activation—damage that could persist for years and wreak havoc across generations. But here’s the most alarming part: these vaccines don’t just harm the vaccinated—they pose a threat to the entire global population. With millions already injected, the study warns that these genetic alterations could lead to cancers and chronic diseases, impacting generations to come. And it gets worse: the vaccines can shed onto the unvaccinated, spreading their toxic effects even further. In addition, the mRNA boosters are causing dangerous blood clotting and immune suppression in healthy young adults within just 48 hours. And as if that wasn’t enough, pets receiving mRNA vaccines could be shedding toxic particles directly onto their owners, escalating the risk exponentially. This is no longer a debate—it’s a full-blown global health emergency unfolding before our eyes. The smoking gun is right here, and the evidence is undeniable. How much longer can we afford to ignore these findings? Watch 's shocking report with Nicolas Hulscher, MPH to learn what this means for our future.

DISTURBING: It’s no longer a theory. A new study has confirmed devastating genetic damage caused by the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including the activation of cancer-causing genes and breakdowns in the immune system. The study, titled “Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation,” reveals how these mRNA injections disrupt thousands of vital genes. Using advanced RNA sequencing, scientists uncovered mitochondrial failure, immune system reprogramming, and oncogenic activation—damage that could persist for years and wreak havoc across generations. But here’s the most alarming part: these vaccines don’t just harm the vaccinated—they pose a threat to the entire global population. With millions already injected, the study warns that these genetic alterations could lead to cancers and chronic diseases, impacting generations to come. And it gets worse: the vaccines can shed onto the unvaccinated, spreading their toxic effects even further. In addition, the mRNA boosters are causing dangerous blood clotting and immune suppression in healthy young adults within just 48 hours. And as if that wasn’t enough, pets receiving mRNA vaccines could be shedding toxic particles directly onto their owners, escalating the risk exponentially. This is no longer a debate—it’s a full-blown global health emergency unfolding before our eyes. The smoking gun is right here, and the evidence is undeniable. How much longer can we afford to ignore these findings? Watch 's shocking report with Nicolas Hulscher, MPH to learn what this means for our future.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

266,820 просмотров • 1 год назад

Did you know that if a mercury-containing vaccine drops on the floor, “the HAZMAT people have to come and take that away”? Yet we inject it into 3-month-old babies. Vaccines may look like a clear liquid, but the process behind them is anything but clean. The process often starts with a diseased animal tissue—like monkey kidneys or even pus scraped from ulcers on cows, Dr. Suzanne Humphries explains. To keep those cells alive, manufacturers use a cocktail of animal blood, antibiotics, and additives like mercury. Why mercury? Because it helps kill off hidden microbes that might survive the process. But as Humphries points out, mercury is so toxic the only places it’s considered “safe” are in vaccines, dental fillings, and toxic waste sites. “Yet we’re okay to take a portion of that vial and inject it into a child, a three month old child. How does that work?” Dr. Humphries asked.

Did you know that if a mercury-containing vaccine drops on the floor, “the HAZMAT people have to come and take that away”? Yet we inject it into 3-month-old babies. Vaccines may look like a clear liquid, but the process behind them is anything but clean. The process often starts with a diseased animal tissue—like monkey kidneys or even pus scraped from ulcers on cows, Dr. Suzanne Humphries explains. To keep those cells alive, manufacturers use a cocktail of animal blood, antibiotics, and additives like mercury. Why mercury? Because it helps kill off hidden microbes that might survive the process. But as Humphries points out, mercury is so toxic the only places it’s considered “safe” are in vaccines, dental fillings, and toxic waste sites. “Yet we’re okay to take a portion of that vial and inject it into a child, a three month old child. How does that work?” Dr. Humphries asked.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,874,627 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Angus Dalgleish: "You must BAN mRNA technology." "Pfizer lied about their mRNA injection and hid data proving it was UNSAFE for the public." "The whole board—CEO, everybody—should be held to account... It should never even have been given an emergency licence." These shots are causing catastrophic damage — exploding "early-onset" turbo cancers in young adults and widespread harm. "You must banish all these vaccines now... They should never be used for infectious disease vaccines... It should be banned." Moderna and Pfizer are still pushing this poison. This is medical malpractice on a global scale. The bodies are piling up while they cover it up. Time to demand justice. The public has been betrayed.

Dr. Angus Dalgleish: "You must BAN mRNA technology." "Pfizer lied about their mRNA injection and hid data proving it was UNSAFE for the public." "The whole board—CEO, everybody—should be held to account... It should never even have been given an emergency licence." These shots are causing catastrophic damage — exploding "early-onset" turbo cancers in young adults and widespread harm. "You must banish all these vaccines now... They should never be used for infectious disease vaccines... It should be banned." Moderna and Pfizer are still pushing this poison. This is medical malpractice on a global scale. The bodies are piling up while they cover it up. Time to demand justice. The public has been betrayed.

Valerie Anne Smith

14,107 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад