正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

draining you

Jason

9,029 subscribers

13,890 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

draining you pt.2 lol

draining you pt.2 lol

Jason

72,507 次观看 • 1 个月前

OK, I don’t want to blame the victim, but if you live in NYC rule number one is you don’t interact with anyone you don’t know in the streets Someone tries to stop you, walk faster & put your hand up and say “No!” Loud enough for other folks to hear you They will look for another mark Be alert at all times, someone walks toward you walk away faster or duck into a store — do not worry about offending them, worry about the 1% chance they are clocking you

OK, I don’t want to blame the victim, but if you live in NYC rule number one is you don’t interact with anyone you don’t know in the streets Someone tries to stop you, walk faster & put your hand up and say “No!” Loud enough for other folks to hear you They will look for another mark Be alert at all times, someone walks toward you walk away faster or duck into a store — do not worry about offending them, worry about the 1% chance they are clocking you

@jason

2,485,259 次观看 • 2 年前

Gross incompetence has become acceptable in our country — we must reverse this trend. If you fuck up this badly you need to resign instantly.

Gross incompetence has become acceptable in our country — we must reverse this trend. If you fuck up this badly you need to resign instantly.

@jason

518,731 次观看 • 2 年前

If any of you are sick of being ripped off…

If any of you are sick of being ripped off…

@jason

57,494 次观看 • 8 天前

If you work at the white house, blow the whistle

If you work at the white house, blow the whistle

@jason

235,501 次观看 • 2 年前

STOP REQUESTING .69 AND DONT SEND .69 OR I WILL 4.20 YOU!!!!

Sensitive content

STOP REQUESTING .69 AND DONT SEND .69 OR I WILL 4.20 YOU!!!!

@jason

72,789 次观看 • 1 个月前

Happy 70th Birthday, Steve Jobs Can you imagine Steve in the age of AI -- what would he have built?

Happy 70th Birthday, Steve Jobs Can you imagine Steve in the age of AI -- what would he have built?

@jason

363,635 次观看 • 1 年前

Grok Grok Bot is insanely useful Here you can see it quickly summarize and make clips from a podcast 🤯

Grok Grok Bot is insanely useful Here you can see it quickly summarize and make clips from a podcast 🤯

@jason

189,397 次观看 • 11 天前

An extremely famous director who you love just sent me this… … my dream of starting a movie studio is getting closer to reality

An extremely famous director who you love just sent me this… … my dream of starting a movie studio is getting closer to reality

@jason

215,498 次观看 • 1 天前

DRAINING IN MY DMS TODAY I WANT YOU IN THERE💪💪

Sensitive content

DRAINING IN MY DMS TODAY I WANT YOU IN THERE💪💪

Noah Landon

42,412 次观看 • 3 个月前

Trading can be very mentally draining, you must learn to manage it.

Trading can be very mentally draining, you must learn to manage it.

Tori 💜

31,066 次观看 • 1 年前

The answer is that what President Trump is doing with a $100,000 front-run-the-market Truth Social subscription is unethical and illegal. A phenomenally poor decision that will cause endless investigations and legal actions if not stopped. The people around him (and in the business community) are using Trump for their own goals, which is how our democracy works, so they are reticient to tell him not to do it, because that would hurt his feelings and potentially get them banished. This TDS -- trump dedication syndrome -- dynamic is most damaging to President Trump himself He could have avoided the Iran blunder if the TDS sufferers had told him, "Mr. President, you might not like what i'm about to tell you, but you're making the worst decision of your life and as your friend i need to tell you: DON’T START A FOREVER WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST." You may not like Tucker Carlson or Joe Rogan or Megyn Kelly, but you have to respect their intellectual honesty and consistency in calling out the Iran war as a disastrous decision -- and not carrying about being banished from the inner circle. [ reminder, be intelligent and thoughtful in the comments -- or snap ban ]

The answer is that what President Trump is doing with a $100,000 front-run-the-market Truth Social subscription is unethical and illegal. A phenomenally poor decision that will cause endless investigations and legal actions if not stopped. The people around him (and in the business community) are using Trump for their own goals, which is how our democracy works, so they are reticient to tell him not to do it, because that would hurt his feelings and potentially get them banished. This TDS -- trump dedication syndrome -- dynamic is most damaging to President Trump himself He could have avoided the Iran blunder if the TDS sufferers had told him, "Mr. President, you might not like what i'm about to tell you, but you're making the worst decision of your life and as your friend i need to tell you: DON’T START A FOREVER WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST." You may not like Tucker Carlson or Joe Rogan or Megyn Kelly, but you have to respect their intellectual honesty and consistency in calling out the Iran war as a disastrous decision -- and not carrying about being banished from the inner circle. [ reminder, be intelligent and thoughtful in the comments -- or snap ban ]

@jason

59,133 次观看 • 26 天前

I'm just not sure where the new Bitcoin buyer comes from it you have stablecoins, $tao and solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 being more interesting, valuable and easier to use 🤷 Anyone have 10x bitcoin:native thesis?

I'm just not sure where the new Bitcoin buyer comes from it you have stablecoins, $tao and solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 being more interesting, valuable and easier to use 🤷 Anyone have 10x bitcoin:native thesis?

@jason

195,389 次观看 • 3 个月前

Draining subs all day show me how pathetic you are😵‍💫🖕💪

Draining subs all day show me how pathetic you are😵‍💫🖕💪

Master Ricky

22,606 次观看 • 3 个月前

Steve Jobs, Aspen 1983 ================ I'm not a natural artist. I can create simple drawings, cut them out, and paste them into documents. This allows me to combine images and text before sending them electronically. Anyone in Aspen can then access their mail and see the drawing by dialing a phone number. We're at the beginning of a revolution. The personal computer is a new medium, and society and computers are truly converging for the first time in the 1980s. In the next 15 years, this initial phase of widespread tool adoption will be complete. During this time, we have a real opportunity to do this well, or to do it poorly. Many of us at Apple are dedicated to doing it well. I want to discuss one final concept before we open the floor to questions. What is a computer program? It's a strange concept. Like an electron, you can't see or touch it. Computer programs have no physical form; they are simply ideas expressed on paper. They are archetypal. Let's compare computer programming to television programming. If you watch tapes of JFK's funeral, you'll likely experience similar emotions to those you felt when you watched it live. Through television programming, we are adept at capturing and recreating experiences. It's expensive and somewhat limited, but we can do it effectively. You can truly feel the excitement of Neil Armstrong landing on the moon. Computer programming does something different. It captures the underlying principles of an experience, not the experience itself. These principles enable countless different experiences that adhere to those rules. A perfect example is a video game. It follows the laws of gravity and angular momentum, creating, for instance, a simple Pong game. The ball always obeys these laws. No two Pong games are ever identical, yet every game follows these fundamental principles. Another example is a program called "Hamurabi." Seven-year-olds play this game where they become King Hamurabi of Sumeria for ten years. The game presents scenarios: "King Hamurabi, in year one, you have 1,000 bushels of wheat, 100 people, and 100 acres of land. Land trades at 24 bushels an acre. Do you want to buy or sell land? How much do you want to plant or feed?" If you don't plant enough, people starve. If you plant a lot, people from neighboring villages will come to your prosperous village. It's a crude macroeconomic model, but these children will play for hours, learning. We need to develop better and more sophisticated models, but this is an interactive learning experience none of us had growing up. Again, thousands of individual experiences, all based on one set of underlying principles. In school, I had a few great teachers and many mediocre ones. Books were my salvation. I could read Aristotle or Plato directly, without an intermediary. A book is phenomenal; it goes straight from the source to the reader. The problem is, you can't ask Aristotle a question. Looking ahead 50 to 100 years, if we can create machines that capture an underlying spirit, set of principles, or way of looking at the world, then when the next Aristotle arrives, perhaps they will carry one of these machines. After they're gone, we could potentially ask the machine, "What would Aristotle have said about this?" We might not get the right answer, but we might. That's incredibly exciting and one of the reasons I do what I do. Now, what would you like to discuss?

Steve Jobs, Aspen 1983 ================ I'm not a natural artist. I can create simple drawings, cut them out, and paste them into documents. This allows me to combine images and text before sending them electronically. Anyone in Aspen can then access their mail and see the drawing by dialing a phone number. We're at the beginning of a revolution. The personal computer is a new medium, and society and computers are truly converging for the first time in the 1980s. In the next 15 years, this initial phase of widespread tool adoption will be complete. During this time, we have a real opportunity to do this well, or to do it poorly. Many of us at Apple are dedicated to doing it well. I want to discuss one final concept before we open the floor to questions. What is a computer program? It's a strange concept. Like an electron, you can't see or touch it. Computer programs have no physical form; they are simply ideas expressed on paper. They are archetypal. Let's compare computer programming to television programming. If you watch tapes of JFK's funeral, you'll likely experience similar emotions to those you felt when you watched it live. Through television programming, we are adept at capturing and recreating experiences. It's expensive and somewhat limited, but we can do it effectively. You can truly feel the excitement of Neil Armstrong landing on the moon. Computer programming does something different. It captures the underlying principles of an experience, not the experience itself. These principles enable countless different experiences that adhere to those rules. A perfect example is a video game. It follows the laws of gravity and angular momentum, creating, for instance, a simple Pong game. The ball always obeys these laws. No two Pong games are ever identical, yet every game follows these fundamental principles. Another example is a program called "Hamurabi." Seven-year-olds play this game where they become King Hamurabi of Sumeria for ten years. The game presents scenarios: "King Hamurabi, in year one, you have 1,000 bushels of wheat, 100 people, and 100 acres of land. Land trades at 24 bushels an acre. Do you want to buy or sell land? How much do you want to plant or feed?" If you don't plant enough, people starve. If you plant a lot, people from neighboring villages will come to your prosperous village. It's a crude macroeconomic model, but these children will play for hours, learning. We need to develop better and more sophisticated models, but this is an interactive learning experience none of us had growing up. Again, thousands of individual experiences, all based on one set of underlying principles. In school, I had a few great teachers and many mediocre ones. Books were my salvation. I could read Aristotle or Plato directly, without an intermediary. A book is phenomenal; it goes straight from the source to the reader. The problem is, you can't ask Aristotle a question. Looking ahead 50 to 100 years, if we can create machines that capture an underlying spirit, set of principles, or way of looking at the world, then when the next Aristotle arrives, perhaps they will carry one of these machines. After they're gone, we could potentially ask the machine, "What would Aristotle have said about this?" We might not get the right answer, but we might. That's incredibly exciting and one of the reasons I do what I do. Now, what would you like to discuss?

@jason

112,272 次观看 • 1 年前