Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dravidianism is a Secularised version of Evangelical Mentality Deepak reframes "Dravidianism" as a secularized Christian movement, not an indigenous ideology. He traces its origins to the Justice Party (formed by Mudaliars, Chettiars, and Naickers around 1917), which emerged as an anti-Brahman movement backed by British colonial and missionary support...

78,128 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

It is because Trump and a lot of his inner circle, namely Elon Musk, VP JD Vance, Howard Lutnick and Peter Thiel are wrapped up in a specific ideology called “The Dark Enlightenment”. This is also where the term “Dark MAGA” comes from. Dark Enlightenment, also known as the neo-reactionary movement (NRx). It is described as an anti-democratic and anti-egalitarian philosophical and political movement. It rejects the idea of progress toward greater liberty and enlightenment, instead advocating for a return to traditional forms of government, such as absolute monarchism. This ideology is often associated with techno-authoritarianism, where societies are governed like corporations with a hierarchical structure. It is essentially Marxism/Socialism from a “right-wing” perspective minus DEI, and based around a Corporate Authoritarian Technocracy. Otherwise known as a “Techno-Monarchy” run by billionaire oligarchs. Yes, it is as HORRIFIC & TERRIFYING as it sounds. Dark Enlightenment doesn’t believe in the idea of democracy or even equality, as we are used to it…But, it sees all the citizens as “shareholders” or “workers” of the corporation (America). This ideology was originally created by Nick Land, and made popular by Curtis Yarvin, a philosopher that JD Vance and Peter Thiel (Palantir) greatly admire. I’m not sure when exactly it happened, but Trump, and by proxy, MAGA at large has been completely SUBVERTED by this sinister ideology.

The Patriot Voice

33,287 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

KHALISTAN FLAG RAISED — INDIAN TIRANGA DECIMATED AT HINDU MANDIRS “UNDER SIEGE” IN CANADA TO EXPOSE INDIA’S PROXIES AND CHALLENGE THE BID TO LABEL KHALISTAN AS “EXTREMISM.” “Be loyal to Canada or leave.” SFJ General Counsel Pannun’s Message To Indo-Canadian-Hindu Organizations Hundreds of Canadian Sikhs participated on April 5, 2026, in “Khalistan Zindabad” rallies at Brampton Triveni Mandir and Surrey Lakshmi Narayan Mandir, directly confronting a campaign driven by the Indian government’s narrative and amplified by Indo-Canadian Hindus to label Khalistan—a political opinion—as “extremism.” The rallies, organized by Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), sent a clear message: Canada will not be allowed to be used as a platform for the Modi regime’s disinformation, spread by Indo-Canadian Hindu organizations to suppress Sikh political expression—Khalistan. SFJ challenged the petition backed by the Hindu Canadian Foundation (HCF), CoHNA, and affiliated mandirs, calling it a deliberate attempt to criminalize Khalistan as democratic advocacy and to silence Canadian Sikhs through mislabeling and fear. The rallies further exposed the export of Modi’s violent Hindutva ideology and India’s repression into Canada, where political dissent—Khalistan—is being targeted through coordinated narratives and pressure tactics. SFJ STATEMENT: “Indo-Canadian Hindus are followers of Modi’s violent Hindutva ideology and are peddling narratives of Indian High Commissioner Patnaik—targeting Khalistan, a political opinion. The same ideology is responsible for systemic violence, repression, and targeting of Khalistan Referendum activists in India, and is now being projected onto Canadian soil.” Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) General Counsel Gurpatwant Singh Pannun issued a direct message to Indo-Canadian Hindu organizations promoting the agenda of India’s Modi regime in Canada: “Be loyal to Canada or leave.” “Canada’s sovereignty and democratic space cannot be undermined by proxy networks acting on behalf of India’s Modi government” added Pannun. The rally made it clear that Khalistan advocacy is not extremism—it is a political position, and any attempt to label it otherwise is an attack on the democratic rights of Canadian Sikhs. Canadian Sikhs will continue to organize, speak, and rally—rejecting intimidation and asserting their right to political self-determination without interference by Indo-Canadian Hindu organizations acting as proxies of Modi’s India.

Sikhs For Justice

18,448 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Political movements inevitably experience moments of transition. The Obidient Movement is no exception. As political realities evolve, some people will remain, some will leave, and others will choose different political paths. That is the nature of every broad based movement. However, it is important to distinguish between genuine strategic disagreements and attempts to justify personal political decisions. It is perfectly legitimate for anyone to decide that another platform better aligns with their convictions or aspirations. Such decisions should be respected without hostility. What is less convincing is when people attribute their departure solely to the alleged absence of structure or investment by Mr. Peter Obi, especially when many of those making such arguments were themselves beneficiaries of the movement's openness and citizen driven character. The Obidient Movement was never conceived as a traditional patronage network sustained by financial inducements. It emerged as a civic awakening powered by conviction, volunteerism, sacrifice, and the collective belief that Nigeria deserves better. Every movement matures over time. Structure is not built overnight; it evolves through committed people who are willing to invest their time, ideas, and resources, not merely wait for someone else to build it for them. Those who genuinely believe in an ideal contribute to strengthening it rather than abandoning it at the first sign of difficulty. At the same time, supporters of the movement must also acknowledge that there is room for improvement. Better coordination, stronger communication, clearer leadership pathways, and more effective grassroots organization are legitimate aspirations that can help the movement mature. Constructive criticism offered in good faith should be welcomed. Ultimately, history often reveals character during difficult seasons. Some people remain committed because they believe in a cause larger than themselves. Others move because circumstances, opportunities, or personal ambitions lead them elsewhere. Neither choice should be disguised as something it is not. The enduring strength of the Obidient Movement will not be measured by how many people leave, but by whether those who remain continue to embody the values that inspired millions in the first place: integrity, service, accountability, and the unwavering belief that a better Nigeria is possible. -DrMo

Dr Mo (Moses Paul)

68,814 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

IMF & WORLD BANK HAVE NOT HELPED AFRICA How can we trust institutions established during colonial times by the very forces that colonised us? This is the question posed by Fadhel Kaboub (Fadhel Kaboub فاضل قابوب on X), an associate professor of economics at Ohio's Denison University, who critiques global financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Despite their inclusive names, these institutions act as neo-colonial tools, deepening poverty and dependency in Africa and the Global South. After decades of so-called ‘aid,’ little progress has been made in Africa, while Western countries advance by exploiting its resources. For example, the foreign-backed proxy war over natural resources in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has lasted over 30 years. Instead of addressing exploitation, the World Bank supports projects like the Inga Dam, which critics say facilitate further resource extraction under the guise of aid. Western powers, led by the US and supported by Europe and the G7, control these institutions. They back initiatives like the Lobito Corridor, a 1,300-kilometre strip of land featuring a railway that snakes through Zambia, the DRC and Angola to ship Africa’s resources across the Atlantic Ocean. The World Bank also supported apartheid South Africa, a history it prefers to forget. Given that Africa pays out more in debt and resource extraction than it receives in aid, is it not time for the rest of the continent to reject these colonial-era models and pursue African-led development, like our siblings in the Sahel? Video credit: Lynn Ngugi on Instagram

African Stream

17,067 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr