正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Driven by money or justice - Which one are you? And why?

14,706 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

40 条评论

Johnny Loveless 🤘🐶 🇺🇸 🇨🇦 的头像
Johnny Loveless 🤘🐶 🇺🇸 🇨🇦1 年前

I love your thoughtful and well-articulated content. Keep it up. You're on 🔥🔥🔥

Public Advocate LMNOP+ 的头像
Public Advocate LMNOP+1 年前

Do you support or oppose Elon's & Trump's positions on Women? Bathrooms & sports? Take the Survey:

DavidMSwanson 的头像
DavidMSwanson1 年前

I haven't heard anyone on either side argue against a meritocracy.. But the DEI and ESG were the banners of the left and it wrecked everything it touched.

Unlearn16 的头像
Unlearn161 年前

The question is - how do you judge merit?

DavidMSwanson 的头像
DavidMSwanson1 年前

Best qualifications and attitude.

Unlearn16 的头像
Unlearn161 年前

Qualifications from where? Attitude is subjective.

DavidMSwanson 的头像
DavidMSwanson1 年前

I do appreciate the argument that secondary and post secondary school can be a barrier especially if money is involved.. But it's generally the left which has run education so it's got a great deal to do with them as to why for many people becoming qualified is too big a hurdle.

cyclically cynical 的头像
cyclically cynical1 年前

1. I’m curious if you’re seeking engagement or conversation on the matter or preaching your position? 2. When you’re defining equality and Justice - whose version of equality and Justice are you speaking of? My definition is likely different than your definition as we have

Unlearn16 的头像
Unlearn161 年前

Serious question. Obvious my opinion is clear, but the reason I began with the other side is because I do believe there is a serious argument for it. Whose version? Interesting question. I would argue - money needs to be out of the justice system and people need to have a fair application of law to maximize their personal freedoms and to negate forms of discrimination

cyclically cynical 的头像
cyclically cynical1 年前

Fair point. The bureaucracy and litigators within the legal system are self-motivate. Let’s not call it a justice system. But that said, does your notion not lend more credence to a Conservative viewpoint that justice ought be designed to hold people and businesses accountable?

eebie 🍁 🌎😷 💉 7 Pfizer club 💉😷 🌎 🍁 的头像
eebie 🍁 🌎😷 💉 7 Pfizer club 💉😷 🌎 🍁1 年前

@unlearn16tweet If the justice system were held at the community level it may be possible to keep money and power/racism out of it. But as soon as it becomes bureaucratic, that hope is gone. IMO Every step of the way takes on the elements of an industry. Looking at court. police, CAS, jail...

rob feral 的头像
rob feral1 年前

@cyclicallysynic @unlearn16tweet But whose community? Your neighbourhood, town, province, country? Part of the purpose of bureaucracy is to maintain consistency across invisible lines on a map. Is it perfect? No, but otherwise it’s really a free for all.

cyclically cynical 的头像
cyclically cynical1 年前

@eebie4 @unlearn16tweet The intended purpose of bureaucracy. Unfortunately, in execution it’s been a disaster. They’ve forgotten whom they’re employed to serve, and more importantly who’s picking up the tab. We’ve enabled bureaucrats to operate with impunity. They’re driving the divide.

rob feral 的头像
rob feral1 年前

@eebie4 @unlearn16tweet Who are you going to replace them with? Community members? They are members of your community. Want them to be volunteers? So that would mean only independently wealthy could take those jobs.

cyclically cynical 的头像
cyclically cynical1 年前

@eebie4 @unlearn16tweet Ideally? Mandatory civil service. Reasonable pay and benefits that are revised every three years. The number of each positions defined by need, with pay being balanced by demand. This will solve governmental backlogs, provide meaningful work skills, and continual turnover.

Gerri Cosenzo 的头像
Gerri Cosenzo1 年前

Justice, fairness and the rule of law. There HAS to be a solid foundation. As a disabled senior living on SS, I have witnessed the unfairness ! Seniors are always getting screwed over. I worked for over 50 years ! FOR WHAT ??

Kim Johnston 的头像
Kim Johnston1 年前

Hands down justice and rule of law. Without those, there is nothing upon which to build 🤷‍♀️

Allyson 的头像
Allyson1 年前

As do you, I believe justice must come first but... it does kind of conflict with my gen x upbringing of always being told life's not fair 😔 Trickle down has never worked and as long as Rich get richer and poor get poorer things will never BE fair

Leslie Lawrence 的头像
Leslie Lawrence1 年前

Driven by justice. I just want to say that I think anyone who has, is or was taught by you lucked out.

kaj56 的头像
kaj561 年前

Justice for sure. However, another divide that you may have overlooked is in-it-for-themselves, (self-enriching politicians) versus honest, want to do what is right and just for society (selfless politicians). We seem to choose razzle dazzle lies over boring sanity.

Karen Valentine C 的头像
Karen Valentine C1 年前

I’m with you

Dianne Bongiorno 的头像
Dianne Bongiorno1 年前

You are so right we about to see when money rules and justice has been shown the door in certain country! Love your work!

Christine “Tenacious C” Bella Ciao! 的头像
Christine “Tenacious C” Bella Ciao!1 年前

Justice.

Dr. Tony Dunsworth 的头像
Dr. Tony Dunsworth1 年前

I'm driven by justice. I know that, in American society, as a cisgendered heterosexual white male society is built for me and I want that privilege you be shared for everyone. Surrendering my privilege so everyone may be treated the way I am now is the least I can do.

Donna Feltner 🟧 的头像
Donna Feltner 🟧1 年前

👏👏👏

Soldier Mouse 的头像
Soldier Mouse1 年前

Lolz. Maybe Canada should focus on building something of value to spur its economy and worry about the rule of law after. What was the last great product exported by Canada? How many internet laws were made before the internet was invented? Nice hat 😂

Donna Petrich 的头像
Donna Petrich1 年前

Great question! I agree, but also think justice should be the foundation & the economy issues come second as both are important, therefore it should hopefully create a balance. If that makes sense. But politics has always seemed a bit confusing/complicated.🤷🏻‍♀️

curt 的头像
curt1 年前

Yes you are right, "but right now there are 2 tiers of justice ". 1 tier is for democrats and another tier is for Republicans. That can't work. So it will crumble and fail.

Sarge 的头像
Sarge1 年前

You lost me at “hey guys.” But IMO, right now, both sides suck along with the rule-of-law. Well, hell, we have a felon/rapist for a president coming on board this month. Things are beyond an abomination to the rule-of-law. Every man for himself, it’s time to jump ship‼️ 😂😂😂😂

vinetimestoo 的头像
vinetimestoo1 年前

Without justice the infrastructure falls away and the foundation will crumble. You are about to hear that crumble loud and clear to the South of you and probably starting around noon on Monday. We are going to be a mess down here. Sorry for the noise...!

THAT effin' Canadian guy.... 🇨🇦🇧🇪🇪🇺 的头像
THAT effin' Canadian guy.... 🇨🇦🇧🇪🇪🇺1 年前

I think any sensible, logicly thinking individual will agree that we need justice and the rule of law to prevail ahead of anything else. Right now, that's failed in so many ways this past decade, which is why we find ourselves where we are now....

Karen Jarvis 的头像
Karen Jarvis1 年前

People tell me to move on! It’s like seeing a freight train coming, knowing it’s going to hit you, and no one else will acknowledge it. It’s not sour grapes. It’s genuine fear.

Swankie Frankie 🌒🌓🌔 的头像
Swankie Frankie 🌒🌓🌔1 年前

100%

LJCosplay53 的头像
LJCosplay531 年前

I'm driven by what the right thing to do is, take care of its people

Thanasi “Theo” Theoharis 的头像
Thanasi “Theo” Theoharis1 年前

Justice, but it feels like treading water with cement socks right now.

cheryl wallace 的头像
cheryl wallace1 年前

Justice.

Herne 的头像
Herne1 年前

Trickle down economics is a big lie. Money never trickles down. I would prefer the latter, but unfortunately we've learned that money buys laws. Eliminate lobbyists as a start, and we need to hold "the rich" to the same laws we all follow. Starting with taxes. Make them pay them

Goateater 的头像
Goateater1 年前

I’m not sure it’s that simple. Given only those two options, justice would need to come first…but define justice…whose concept of justice?

🎞Wallace The Cinephile 的头像
🎞Wallace The Cinephile1 年前

I 💙 you Lady Socrates. Teach us.

Kim Johnston 的头像
Kim Johnston1 年前

We can ensure justice and rule of law with hard work, but even with hard work we cannot ensure monetary trickle down outcomes. That’s a huge concern.

相关视频

This Kia Havertz or which one are you talking about?
1:03

Sensitive content

This Kia Havertz or which one are you talking about?

Arsenal Rep

304,595 次观看 • 7 个月前