Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Drop what you're doing and watch this. A 22 year old non-coder built an app that made $60K in its first month. Another non-coder built one in 3 days and crossed $180K in roughly 2 months. The lesson isn't "learn to code." It's almost the opposite. Watch this video....

VisionSurge's profile picture

Vision Surge

74,399 subscribers

91,015 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

BildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

18 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mind Essentials
Mind Essentialsvor 12 Tagen

"Who is this for and where do they already hang out?" might be more important now than "How do I build this?"

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

Exactly. Building is getting cheaper and easier. Knowing exactly who has the problem and how to reach them is becoming the real advantage.

Profilbild von Deep Flow
Deep Flowvor 12 Tagen

The founder knowing those communities before building the product feels like a much bigger advantage than people realize.

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

100%. Knowing the community means you already understand their problems, language, and what they're willing to pay for. That's a huge head start.

Profilbild von Muscle Surge
Muscle Surgevor 12 Tagen

The distribution part is the real lesson here. Building the app is becoming easier. Getting people to care is still hard

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

And that's why distribution is becoming a skill worth learning on its own. A great product sitting in an empty room is still an empty business.

Profilbild von Flow State
Flow Statevor 12 Tagen

The $100K+ agency quote to building it himself in 3 days is a pretty insane example of how much the economics of software have changed.

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

And that's what makes this so interesting. The cost of building is collapsing, but finding something people actually want is still hard.

Profilbild von Sasha
Sashavor 12 Tagen

This is why random vibe-coded apps usually go nowhere. Being able to build something doesn't mean anyone wants it.

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

That's the trap. AI makes it easy to build first and ask questions later. The smarter move is finding the demand before writing the first prompt.

Profilbild von Library Path
Library Pathvor 12 Tagen

The 3-day build is crazy, but I'm more interested in what happened after day 3. That's where the business actually started.

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

Exactly. Day 3 gave him a product. The next two months turned it into a business. That's the part most AI demos leave out.

Profilbild von Zoltium
Zoltiumvor 12 Tagen

This completely changes the value of knowing a niche really well. If you already understand the people and their problems, AI can fill in a lot of the technical gap.

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

That's becoming a serious advantage. You can teach AI the technical stuff much faster than you can teach someone years of understanding a niche.

Profilbild von Wisdom
Wisdomvor 12 Tagen

The $60K number gets your attention, but the way he found those first users is the part worth studying.

Profilbild von Vision Surge
Vision Surgevor 12 Tagen

Yeah, that's the part I'd reverse-engineer. Where did the first 10 customers come from? That's probably more useful than studying the code.

Profilbild von unfair.so
unfair.sovor 12 Tagen

the human reviewing the diff still cares

Profilbild von 👑AMIT EINSTEIN👑
👑AMIT EINSTEIN👑vor 12 Tagen

Tv 📺

Ähnliche Videos

"If everyone can build, it's your unique expertise, judgement, distribution, and more that people will pay for." Here’s my new episode with Amol Jain, Replit ⠕'s head of product engineering, about what it takes to turn a vibe-coded product into a real business. Amol shared: → 3 examples of apps built by non-coders that reached six figures → 4 steps to take an AI-built app from prototype to production (security!) → How to find your competitive advantage when code is free Some quotes from Amol: “He built the whole thing end to end in three days. Within the first two months, he was already at $180K+ in revenue.” “At Replit, this internal tool saves us six figures in SaaS costs. More importantly, anytime we want to add a feature, we just do it. We’re not at the mercy of someone else’s roadmap.” “The businesses that survive go beyond code to offer expertise, trust, infrastructure, networks, systems of record, data, physical goods, or services.” 📌 Watch now: Thanks to our sponsors: Riverside: The all-in-one AI studio I use to record and edit my podcast Linear: The AI agent platform for modern teams
0:30

"If everyone can build, it's your unique expertise, judgement, distribution, and more that people will pay for." Here’s my new episode with Amol Jain, Replit ⠕'s head of product engineering, about what it takes to turn a vibe-coded product into a real business. Amol shared: → 3 examples of apps built by non-coders that reached six figures → 4 steps to take an AI-built app from prototype to production (security!) → How to find your competitive advantage when code is free Some quotes from Amol: “He built the whole thing end to end in three days. Within the first two months, he was already at $180K+ in revenue.” “At Replit, this internal tool saves us six figures in SaaS costs. More importantly, anytime we want to add a feature, we just do it. We’re not at the mercy of someone else’s roadmap.” “The businesses that survive go beyond code to offer expertise, trust, infrastructure, networks, systems of record, data, physical goods, or services.” 📌 Watch now: Thanks to our sponsors: Riverside: The all-in-one AI studio I use to record and edit my podcast Linear: The AI agent platform for modern teams

Peter Yang

104,352 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.
5:13

From Eric Vishria on how the top AI founders are building products completely opposite of the SaaS era: "One of the things that is really different in the AI world versus the SaaS world, is that in the SaaS world, over and over again, you had people who really understood the customer. And the problem. And then they understood a domain. They understood what the technology was more or less capable of. But it wasn't a real question of if you could build something or not. For example, take Salesforce, Workday, and ServiceNow. CRM existed before Salesforce. HR management existed before Workday. Same thing with ServiceNow. So in every case, Salesforce followed Siebel. Workday followed Peoplesoft. ServiceNow followed Peregrine and Remedy, and others. So they were just kind of, cloud SaaS versions of the prior generation product. They just understood the customers. They understood the problem. And they were just like, here's a better version. And that evolved a little bit over time in SaaS land. But that's what it is. And so product development in that way was done by people who really understood the customer and the problems. And then just took advantage of the next wave. And this is almost diametrically opposite of product development in the AI era. When I look at the teams that are having the most success today, they have intimate knowledge of the models. They are right on the frontier of understanding which models are better at what, and why, and when. And what they're going to be good at and what they're not going to be good at. And what they're spending their time on, is figuring out how do I apply this capability of this model to this domain or to this user. So they're actually working inside out or technology out, versus customer problem in. And of course, they understand the customer problem. And a lot of times they have firsthand knowledge of it. But they're really close to the metal and capability, and they're applying it. And I think this is a really different way to develop products than in SaaS. I started my career as a product manager a long time ago, and it's almost the complete opposite of everything you learned. "Listen to the customer, understand it, then bring it back to the engineering and product teams." If you did that right now, ask a bunch of customers what they want out of AI, and you brought it back, for the most part, it may not be possible today with today's technology. Whereas the teams that are winning right now really understand the technology and are applying it out. And so I think this reversal matters. I think it's a big difference in terms of how companies are getting built. And maybe even the types of entrepreneurs that will be successful. I'm not sure. You're seeing some real change there. Look at the Bret Taylor's at Sierra. That's a super, super technical founder who really gets it. Brett and Clay really get it. You look at Michael and his co-founders at Cursor. They're super technical founders and they get it. They all really understand what these things can and can't do. And that's a pretty different dynamic relative to the way the best SaaS companies got built." Link in bio for the full conversation going deep on the current class of startups going from zero to $100m+ in ARR within 12 months.

The Peel

209,752 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I’m thrilled to announce we’ve raised $44M to build a new home for product design. Meet Noon. No workflow is more broken and fragmented in 2026 than the product designers’. The very same people who care most about building software don’t have software purpose built for them. Kushagra Sinha and I have lived this problem first hand as designers ourselves. That’s why we built Noon. The first product design tool that works entirely on your product code, so you can design not only how a product looks, but also how it works. With AI at its core that works in seconds, not minutes. For the first time, you can create, iterate, build, test and ship. All in one canvas. No translations or roundtrips to the codebase and back. Comment “Get Noon” and we’ll get you on the list for early access.
0:41

I’m thrilled to announce we’ve raised $44M to build a new home for product design. Meet Noon. No workflow is more broken and fragmented in 2026 than the product designers’. The very same people who care most about building software don’t have software purpose built for them. Kushagra Sinha and I have lived this problem first hand as designers ourselves. That’s why we built Noon. The first product design tool that works entirely on your product code, so you can design not only how a product looks, but also how it works. With AI at its core that works in seconds, not minutes. For the first time, you can create, iterate, build, test and ship. All in one canvas. No translations or roundtrips to the codebase and back. Comment “Get Noon” and we’ll get you on the list for early access.

Aditya Bandi

686,842 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.
1:27

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.

David Senra

27,151 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

My team and I have mentored 250+ founders in the last 6 months. Almost all of them were stuck on the same three things, and each one costs 6 to 12 months of progress (recorded a 17-minute breakdown of what they are and how to avoid them): 1. Most were spread too thin. 3 or 4 ideas at once. A bit of AI automation, some crypto, consulting on the side. You don't hit your first million that way. Pick one problem. Solve it a thousand times. 2. The ones who did pick one lane usually picked the wrong one. Lead generation is where businesses actually pay 4 to 5 figures a month. The tool stack that used to need $25K a year now runs on $300. But 80-90% of operators are using that edge to send more of the same copy that stopped working years ago. Volume is nothing but a race to the bottom. 3. And the ones on the right lane quit too early. "Six months to six figures" made them think they should already be rich, so they bailed in month 4. Year 1, only 15% of businesses are profitable. Year 2 and 3, another 40% get there. The operators who stay past month 4 hold all the case studies when the rest are just starting. Worth your time if you're building anything in the AI space now:
17:14

My team and I have mentored 250+ founders in the last 6 months. Almost all of them were stuck on the same three things, and each one costs 6 to 12 months of progress (recorded a 17-minute breakdown of what they are and how to avoid them): 1. Most were spread too thin. 3 or 4 ideas at once. A bit of AI automation, some crypto, consulting on the side. You don't hit your first million that way. Pick one problem. Solve it a thousand times. 2. The ones who did pick one lane usually picked the wrong one. Lead generation is where businesses actually pay 4 to 5 figures a month. The tool stack that used to need $25K a year now runs on $300. But 80-90% of operators are using that edge to send more of the same copy that stopped working years ago. Volume is nothing but a race to the bottom. 3. And the ones on the right lane quit too early. "Six months to six figures" made them think they should already be rich, so they bailed in month 4. Year 1, only 15% of businesses are profitable. Year 2 and 3, another 40% get there. The operators who stay past month 4 hold all the case studies when the rest are just starting. Worth your time if you're building anything in the AI space now:

Alex Vacca

10,507 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ben McCollum won 4 national titles at Northwest Missouri State. His biggest lesson came before any of them. Day one, first practice, he walks in and thinks: "This is what first place feels like." Not on the scoreboard. In the room. First-place people work hard — but it's more than that. There's an edge. And there's energy. The guys who didn't make it weren't bad kids. They were just moody. Flat. They took life out of the building. Culture isn't built by talent. It's built by people who bring work, edge, and energy every day. First-place people don't just perform. They raise the room.
1:34

Ben McCollum won 4 national titles at Northwest Missouri State. His biggest lesson came before any of them. Day one, first practice, he walks in and thinks: "This is what first place feels like." Not on the scoreboard. In the room. First-place people work hard — but it's more than that. There's an edge. And there's energy. The guys who didn't make it weren't bad kids. They were just moody. Flat. They took life out of the building. Culture isn't built by talent. It's built by people who bring work, edge, and energy every day. First-place people don't just perform. They raise the room.

James Purchin

204,278 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Anthropic CEO: "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free." this 2-minute clip is the most important thing I watched this month. ↓ Save this before everyone copies the playbook Not only the people who refuse AI, but also those who think signing up for Claude counts as using it. the part nobody wanted to hear: > you don't need a co-founder who codes > you don't need $50K for an MVP > you don't need 6 months of development > you need Claude and one weekend most people will watch this and worry about their job. A few will open Claude this weekend and vibe code their first product. I used Claude to build my first product. No code. No cost. No CS degree. I did exactly this and documented the whole process step by step. Full guide in the article below.
0:52

Anthropic CEO: "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free." this 2-minute clip is the most important thing I watched this month. ↓ Save this before everyone copies the playbook Not only the people who refuse AI, but also those who think signing up for Claude counts as using it. the part nobody wanted to hear: > you don't need a co-founder who codes > you don't need $50K for an MVP > you don't need 6 months of development > you need Claude and one weekend most people will watch this and worry about their job. A few will open Claude this weekend and vibe code their first product. I used Claude to build my first product. No code. No cost. No CS degree. I did exactly this and documented the whole process step by step. Full guide in the article below.

Khairallah AL-Awady

53,454 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The three ways AI, particularly long-horizon agents, are changing the role of PMs: "First, product development is changing because the models and the capabilities are growing so fast that if you try to be very strict and stringent about describing exactly what you're going to build, its not going to work. It's very important for the PMs to be understanding of what these models are capable of and to be hands-on. The only thing PMs do now is articulate what the customer needs are at the highest level. But the actual product is built bottoms up by engineers, researchers, and product managers and designers all working together on the code itself. Second, the product manager and designer role are merging increasingly. When given the choice between an extra designer and extra engineer, they're saying, give us an extra engineer. And the other very important thing that's fundamentally different is non-deterministic software. Today, you could do X, Y happens. But if you do slight variation of X something completely different happens. That means someone has to evaluate whether or not what the software is producing is reasonable or not across various use cases. So the PM's job is to be very clear at a high level of what the user needs are, and then have a very clear sense of whether this product is good to ship or not by evaluating it."
2:58

The three ways AI, particularly long-horizon agents, are changing the role of PMs: "First, product development is changing because the models and the capabilities are growing so fast that if you try to be very strict and stringent about describing exactly what you're going to build, its not going to work. It's very important for the PMs to be understanding of what these models are capable of and to be hands-on. The only thing PMs do now is articulate what the customer needs are at the highest level. But the actual product is built bottoms up by engineers, researchers, and product managers and designers all working together on the code itself. Second, the product manager and designer role are merging increasingly. When given the choice between an extra designer and extra engineer, they're saying, give us an extra engineer. And the other very important thing that's fundamentally different is non-deterministic software. Today, you could do X, Y happens. But if you do slight variation of X something completely different happens. That means someone has to evaluate whether or not what the software is producing is reasonable or not across various use cases. So the PM's job is to be very clear at a high level of what the user needs are, and then have a very clear sense of whether this product is good to ship or not by evaluating it."

Patrick OShaughnessy

41,820 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Jake, who built a $50K/month alarm app in 4 months, says the most valuable skill right now isn't building it's... "Focus on top of funnel only. That is the most valuable skill right now is marketing. There's so many people that can build an app and it's so easy with AI, but there's not so many people that know how to market and know how to get views." "If nobody knows about your app, it doesn't exist. You can build as many features as you want." "Building doesn't really matter so much. You got to build a good product, of course. But getting views is more of the unknown."
0:27

Jake, who built a $50K/month alarm app in 4 months, says the most valuable skill right now isn't building it's... "Focus on top of funnel only. That is the most valuable skill right now is marketing. There's so many people that can build an app and it's so easy with AI, but there's not so many people that know how to market and know how to get views." "If nobody knows about your app, it doesn't exist. You can build as many features as you want." "Building doesn't really matter so much. You got to build a good product, of course. But getting views is more of the unknown."

Starter Story

333,199 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.
0:45

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.

Noisy

43,348 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sarah who built a $340K/month app in 60 days says: women are about to take over the app economy and men should prepare... "Women are going to dominate this app space and men should prepare for that because women dominate distribution." "The only thing that was standing in the way of women building the number one app on the App Store was the technical barrier, but now, with AI, that's gone." "Majority of influencers are women. We know how to have community. The best product doesn't win; the best known one does."
0:43

Sarah who built a $340K/month app in 60 days says: women are about to take over the app economy and men should prepare... "Women are going to dominate this app space and men should prepare for that because women dominate distribution." "The only thing that was standing in the way of women building the number one app on the App Store was the technical barrier, but now, with AI, that's gone." "Majority of influencers are women. We know how to have community. The best product doesn't win; the best known one does."

Starter Story

59,297 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I'm so sick of Chinese parts. This brand new mount from O'Reilly's is already shot to hell. Getting them in and out of the Nissan Rogue isn't fun either. It lasted about a month before the first complaint, and within a month they said it was getting worse. We need American-made parts built by people who take pride in workmanship.
0:48

I'm so sick of Chinese parts. This brand new mount from O'Reilly's is already shot to hell. Getting them in and out of the Nissan Rogue isn't fun either. It lasted about a month before the first complaint, and within a month they said it was getting worse. We need American-made parts built by people who take pride in workmanship.

John Stafford

31,286 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Lovable (Lovable) Co-Founder Fabian Hedin told us in the end they want to get to a place where any business built on Lovable is more successful than if it would be built elsewhere: "As opposed to these developer tools that help you output code. The output of Lovable is not code." "Sure, we write code for you and we handle that for you, but you're not looking at code, right? You're looking at the product that you're building...looking at the business that you're building." "In the end, getting to a place where any business that is built on Lovable is more successful than if it would be built elsewhere."
0:52

Lovable (Lovable) Co-Founder Fabian Hedin told us in the end they want to get to a place where any business built on Lovable is more successful than if it would be built elsewhere: "As opposed to these developer tools that help you output code. The output of Lovable is not code." "Sure, we write code for you and we handle that for you, but you're not looking at code, right? You're looking at the product that you're building...looking at the business that you're building." "In the end, getting to a place where any business that is built on Lovable is more successful than if it would be built elsewhere."

etn.

10,405 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."
1:12

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Today Sam Asante and I are releasing Typeahead 2.0 on Product Hunt. Sam and I started this company because we think local AI software is going to become a much bigger part of how people use their computers. Typeahead is the first product from that thesis. The first version made the idea clear. AI autocomplete should work in the apps where writing already happens. Since then, we have been shipping toward the product that idea deserves. The app feels faster and more natural. Suggestions are easier to control. The experience is more native to the Mac. It's getting better at staying out of the way until the exact moment it can help. That matters because writing is personal. The best AI writing help keeps you in the sentence. You stay in flow and keep your voice. The machine helps without taking over. Typeahead works across your Mac, runs locally, works offline, and is built to feel like software you own. We’re live on Product Hunt today.
1:10

Today Sam Asante and I are releasing Typeahead 2.0 on Product Hunt. Sam and I started this company because we think local AI software is going to become a much bigger part of how people use their computers. Typeahead is the first product from that thesis. The first version made the idea clear. AI autocomplete should work in the apps where writing already happens. Since then, we have been shipping toward the product that idea deserves. The app feels faster and more natural. Suggestions are easier to control. The experience is more native to the Mac. It's getting better at staying out of the way until the exact moment it can help. That matters because writing is personal. The best AI writing help keeps you in the sentence. You stay in flow and keep your voice. The machine helps without taking over. Typeahead works across your Mac, runs locally, works offline, and is built to feel like software you own. We’re live on Product Hunt today.

Hiten Shah

28,205 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

AI can’t yet one-shot an entire product—but with the rise of vibe coding, supercharged developers are getting close. Part intuition and experimentation, part validation, it's the new frontier of software development. YC's Tom Blomfield (Tom Blomfield) has spent the last month building side projects with tools like Claude Code, Windsurf, and Aqua, seeing just how far you can push modern LLMs. From writing full-stack apps to debugging with a single copy paste of an error message, AI is becoming a legit collaborator in the dev process. With tips from YC founders in the Spring batch, this is a playbook for anyone who wants to get the most out of vibe coding and build faster.
0:45

AI can’t yet one-shot an entire product—but with the rise of vibe coding, supercharged developers are getting close. Part intuition and experimentation, part validation, it's the new frontier of software development. YC's Tom Blomfield (Tom Blomfield) has spent the last month building side projects with tools like Claude Code, Windsurf, and Aqua, seeing just how far you can push modern LLMs. From writing full-stack apps to debugging with a single copy paste of an error message, AI is becoming a legit collaborator in the dev process. With tips from YC founders in the Spring batch, this is a playbook for anyone who wants to get the most out of vibe coding and build faster.

Y Combinator

151,446 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The interesting part isn't just generating a product. Turns out GPT-6 Astra + Dreamina Seedance 2.5 is an actual pipeline. It's going from a draft → real-looking product → product page in one continuous workflow. I started with a simple product concept in Dreamina. Then GPT-6 Astra interpreted the draft, built out the actual product, and used it to create the final product detail page. Dreamina's pricing also makes it practical to generate a bunch of early concepts instead of overthinking the first one. This workflow is definitely worth experimenting with. #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner
0:28

The interesting part isn't just generating a product. Turns out GPT-6 Astra + Dreamina Seedance 2.5 is an actual pipeline. It's going from a draft → real-looking product → product page in one continuous workflow. I started with a simple product concept in Dreamina. Then GPT-6 Astra interpreted the draft, built out the actual product, and used it to create the final product detail page. Dreamina's pricing also makes it practical to generate a bunch of early concepts instead of overthinking the first one. This workflow is definitely worth experimenting with. #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner

Md Riyazuddin

61,601 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

David Sacks on why founders get distribution wrong “The biggest mistake I see these days is brilliant founders who are brilliant product people, but they haven't thought about how they're going to make their product grow. They launch their product and it's like crickets chirping.” Having a technique that gets you to scale is very important. “If you're going to have a breakout startup, you've really got to think about how you're going to innovate on distribution, not just product.” What’s tricky about this is what he calls The Law of Distribution Arbitrage: “Successful distribution techniques are copied until they are no longer effective. Think about SEO. The first people to use that technique got a lot of traffic from Google. Then, a whole bunch of people started doing it and they started gaming the system. Eventually, Google did their notorious Panda release and everyone using SEO basically lost traffic.” Friend virality is another example: “If you look at Facebook, the friend virality was very powerful in the early days. Then people got sick of the spam and stopped paying attention… So the techniques that work initially to get distribution don't stay working because everyone copies them until the channels are spammed to death.” Video source: Draper University (2014)
3:48

David Sacks on why founders get distribution wrong “The biggest mistake I see these days is brilliant founders who are brilliant product people, but they haven't thought about how they're going to make their product grow. They launch their product and it's like crickets chirping.” Having a technique that gets you to scale is very important. “If you're going to have a breakout startup, you've really got to think about how you're going to innovate on distribution, not just product.” What’s tricky about this is what he calls The Law of Distribution Arbitrage: “Successful distribution techniques are copied until they are no longer effective. Think about SEO. The first people to use that technique got a lot of traffic from Google. Then, a whole bunch of people started doing it and they started gaming the system. Eventually, Google did their notorious Panda release and everyone using SEO basically lost traffic.” Friend virality is another example: “If you look at Facebook, the friend virality was very powerful in the early days. Then people got sick of the spam and stopped paying attention… So the techniques that work initially to get distribution don't stay working because everyone copies them until the channels are spammed to death.” Video source: Draper University (2014)

Startup Archive

56,468 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Creator of Claude Code: “I’m not just prompting agents anymore. I’m building a harness with graphs and loops - and the agents inside it are building my agent. In 3–6 months, we’ll all be engineering harnesses for our agentic systems.” In this 10-minute talk, Boris Cherny reveals what the future of agentic engineering will look like. Worth more than a $500 agentic AI course. Watch it today, then read the complete guide to building an agent harness in the article below.
11:17

Creator of Claude Code: “I’m not just prompting agents anymore. I’m building a harness with graphs and loops - and the agents inside it are building my agent. In 3–6 months, we’ll all be engineering harnesses for our agentic systems.” In this 10-minute talk, Boris Cherny reveals what the future of agentic engineering will look like. Worth more than a $500 agentic AI course. Watch it today, then read the complete guide to building an agent harness in the article below.

Ichigo

72,810 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen