正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

DSA Co-Chair Ashik Siddique laid out the group’s strategy for using the Democratic Party as a launching pad for an independent socialist party. Siddique said DSA is a “big tent” that includes members who want to reform Democrats, those calling for a clean break, and others pursuing a “dirty... break” using the party’s ballot line until they are forced out. He described the prevailing “party surrogate model” as running DSA candidates under the Democratic label while building the infrastructure for a future socialist party. Representing the DSA’s Groundwork Caucus, Siddique made the goal explicit: “We are trying to build the party, and in many ways we’re already doing it.” It is important to understand that Siddique is the DSA’s respectable frontman, the buttoned up figure they present so attention drifts away from members calling to abolish the family or boasting that New York City is flying people in for trans healthcare and footing the bill. It is an open admission that the DSA’s long game is to hollow out the Democratic Party from the inside until it is ready to replace it or compete against it directly, which, as you will hear later, is exactly what they do in deep blue areas.show more

Stu Smith

55,150 subscribers

24,208 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 DSA National Co-Chair: We Use the Democratic Ballot Line as a Vehicle for “Socialist Power” and “the Democratic Party leadership hates that, and we think that's great.” Ashik Siddique made the strategy explicit: DSA runs candidates on the Democratic ballot line, and it also works to “throw out bad Democrats,” but the larger goal is building “independent power” that can take on both parties. “We are trying to organize to throw out bad Democrats, but we're also building socialist power, and the point for us is to build independent power through our organization.” “Mostly we do run people on the ballot line in primaries on the Democratic Party ballot line, but we have our independent power, and the Democratic Party leadership hates that, and we think that's great.” Sure sounds like DSA is a parasite and the Democratic Party, for some reason, refuses to rip it off.

🚨 DSA National Co-Chair: We Use the Democratic Ballot Line as a Vehicle for “Socialist Power” and “the Democratic Party leadership hates that, and we think that's great.” Ashik Siddique made the strategy explicit: DSA runs candidates on the Democratic ballot line, and it also works to “throw out bad Democrats,” but the larger goal is building “independent power” that can take on both parties. “We are trying to organize to throw out bad Democrats, but we're also building socialist power, and the point for us is to build independent power through our organization.” “Mostly we do run people on the ballot line in primaries on the Democratic Party ballot line, but we have our independent power, and the Democratic Party leadership hates that, and we think that's great.” Sure sounds like DSA is a parasite and the Democratic Party, for some reason, refuses to rip it off.

Stu Smith

55,559 次观看 • 7 个月前

This is Chicago DSA’s Sean Duffy explaining socialism without explaining virtually anything socialist about DSA. It’s the usual dodge from the DSA playbook. Frame corporations and billionaires as villains, blame Democrats for dismantling welfare and “decimating unions,” and avoid explaining the specifics of what DSA actually wants to build. It also captures DSA’s parasitic relationship with the Democratic Party. They condemn the party while relying on its ballot line and electoral infrastructure to win office.

This is Chicago DSA’s Sean Duffy explaining socialism without explaining virtually anything socialist about DSA. It’s the usual dodge from the DSA playbook. Frame corporations and billionaires as villains, blame Democrats for dismantling welfare and “decimating unions,” and avoid explaining the specifics of what DSA actually wants to build. It also captures DSA’s parasitic relationship with the Democratic Party. They condemn the party while relying on its ballot line and electoral infrastructure to win office.

Stu Smith

10,812 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Hasan Piker and Chris Rabb Lay Out the DSA Playbook for Using the Democratic Ballot Line Against the Party This clip is a clean look at the socialist left’s bizarre frenemy relationship with the Democratic Party. Hasan opens by attacking Democrats directly. They “don’t love you,” “don’t care about you,” and “don’t care about your interests.” But he does not tell people to leave the party. He tells them the Democratic primary is the battlefield because it “determines the trajectory of the Democratic Party.” Then Chris Rabb picks up the thread. Rabb says he “identif[ies] as a democratic socialist,” but is “running as a Democrat because the system creates this narrowness.” In other words, the Democratic label is not the identity. It is the vehicle. Rabb makes that even clearer moments later. He says Democrats may share the same label “in this moment,” but “we are very different.” Then he tells voters, “You don’t have to love the Democratic Party to vote for me. I do not care because I’m not here for the party. I’m here for the people.” The result is a strange but increasingly effective hostile partnership. The DSA needs the Democratic ballot line because third-party politics is a dead end. The Democratic Party keeps absorbing candidates who openly reject it. And over time, that one-way arrangement lets the socialist left take more ground inside the party while still pretending to be outsiders. But what do Democrats actually get out of this arrangement?

🚨 Hasan Piker and Chris Rabb Lay Out the DSA Playbook for Using the Democratic Ballot Line Against the Party This clip is a clean look at the socialist left’s bizarre frenemy relationship with the Democratic Party. Hasan opens by attacking Democrats directly. They “don’t love you,” “don’t care about you,” and “don’t care about your interests.” But he does not tell people to leave the party. He tells them the Democratic primary is the battlefield because it “determines the trajectory of the Democratic Party.” Then Chris Rabb picks up the thread. Rabb says he “identif[ies] as a democratic socialist,” but is “running as a Democrat because the system creates this narrowness.” In other words, the Democratic label is not the identity. It is the vehicle. Rabb makes that even clearer moments later. He says Democrats may share the same label “in this moment,” but “we are very different.” Then he tells voters, “You don’t have to love the Democratic Party to vote for me. I do not care because I’m not here for the party. I’m here for the people.” The result is a strange but increasingly effective hostile partnership. The DSA needs the Democratic ballot line because third-party politics is a dead end. The Democratic Party keeps absorbing candidates who openly reject it. And over time, that one-way arrangement lets the socialist left take more ground inside the party while still pretending to be outsiders. But what do Democrats actually get out of this arrangement?

Stu Smith

266,177 次观看 • 4 个月前

David Sacks: The DSA is taking over the Democratic Party, here are their radical policy goals “They actually say they want to abolish the Senate. They want to abolish the carceral state, that means basically police forces and prisons. They want to abolish ICE and grant amnesty for all, they do not support any deportations whatsoever. They want to replace the President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary that is chosen by and subordinate to Congress. So this would be a total makeover of our constitutional system. They want public ownership of major corporations. They want to defund the Department of War. This is a very radical organization, and you would laugh at a lot of these types of proposals, but you can't really laugh at it anymore because these guys are taking over the Democratic Party. They do not actually see the traditional establishment wing of the Democratic Party as an ally. They see it as an obstacle. A DSA co-chair said, ‘We're using the Democratic Party as a ballot access vehicle, not because we share its goals. We build our own organization, get elected under the Democratic label, caucus with Democrats when it's useful, and push our own agenda from the inside. We see the Democratic establishment as an obstacle, not a home.’ So the DSA is coming for the Democratic Party. It controls the base now, it's where all the energy is. I think this takeover will continue.”

David Sacks: The DSA is taking over the Democratic Party, here are their radical policy goals “They actually say they want to abolish the Senate. They want to abolish the carceral state, that means basically police forces and prisons. They want to abolish ICE and grant amnesty for all, they do not support any deportations whatsoever. They want to replace the President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary that is chosen by and subordinate to Congress. So this would be a total makeover of our constitutional system. They want public ownership of major corporations. They want to defund the Department of War. This is a very radical organization, and you would laugh at a lot of these types of proposals, but you can't really laugh at it anymore because these guys are taking over the Democratic Party. They do not actually see the traditional establishment wing of the Democratic Party as an ally. They see it as an obstacle. A DSA co-chair said, ‘We're using the Democratic Party as a ballot access vehicle, not because we share its goals. We build our own organization, get elected under the Democratic label, caucus with Democrats when it's useful, and push our own agenda from the inside. We see the Democratic establishment as an obstacle, not a home.’ So the DSA is coming for the Democratic Party. It controls the base now, it's where all the energy is. I think this takeover will continue.”

The All-In Podcast

149,230 次观看 • 2 个月前

.Stephen A Smith: "The Democratic Party, whether it was Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris, said as a party, this is who we want to the voters and we're picking your candidates for you. That is the difference that has hurt the Democratic Party. They haven't been about the people."

.Stephen A Smith: "The Democratic Party, whether it was Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris, said as a party, this is who we want to the voters and we're picking your candidates for you. That is the difference that has hurt the Democratic Party. They haven't been about the people."

The Megyn Kelly Show

33,742 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Is This Chris Cuomo Surrendering to DSA? Is DSA the Future of the Democratic Party? This Chris Cuomo segment almost feels like a surrender to the DSA. Cuomo frames the Democratic Socialists of America as the Democrats’ best shot at capturing populist affordability anger, then brings on DSA co-chair Ashik Siddique to make the socialist case. And who is the counterpoint? John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan, a Democratic mega-donor law-firm guy warning that socialism leads to Cuba and Venezuela. If the public face of the anti-DSA argument inside Democratic politics is a wealthy establishment Democrat telling people to trust the old Bill Clinton model while sounding like a Cold War PSA, then DSA has already won the optics fight before Ashik even opens his mouth. The worst part is that Morgan is basically right about the danger. He is just the worst possible messenger for it. If I had his ear, I would have told him to stop doing generic “socialism bad” warnings and get specific. Hit DSA on its own record. Hit them on their repeated delegations to Cuba and Venezuela, the praise for socialist regimes, the constant laundering of authoritarian politics through “solidarity,” and the new DSA platform coming this July, which I broke the news on. Saying “socialism bad” in the abstract does nothing. The argument has to be specific. DSA is bad by its own words and actions. By the delegations it sends, the regimes it flatters, the platform it passes, and the radicals it keeps elevating. Cuomo basically tees Siddique up as young and plugged into the future of the party. Morgan comes off like a dinosaur. And if he is serious about taking back his party, whoever is advising him on how to talk about DSA is doing him no favors.

🚨 Is This Chris Cuomo Surrendering to DSA? Is DSA the Future of the Democratic Party? This Chris Cuomo segment almost feels like a surrender to the DSA. Cuomo frames the Democratic Socialists of America as the Democrats’ best shot at capturing populist affordability anger, then brings on DSA co-chair Ashik Siddique to make the socialist case. And who is the counterpoint? John Morgan of Morgan & Morgan, a Democratic mega-donor law-firm guy warning that socialism leads to Cuba and Venezuela. If the public face of the anti-DSA argument inside Democratic politics is a wealthy establishment Democrat telling people to trust the old Bill Clinton model while sounding like a Cold War PSA, then DSA has already won the optics fight before Ashik even opens his mouth. The worst part is that Morgan is basically right about the danger. He is just the worst possible messenger for it. If I had his ear, I would have told him to stop doing generic “socialism bad” warnings and get specific. Hit DSA on its own record. Hit them on their repeated delegations to Cuba and Venezuela, the praise for socialist regimes, the constant laundering of authoritarian politics through “solidarity,” and the new DSA platform coming this July, which I broke the news on. Saying “socialism bad” in the abstract does nothing. The argument has to be specific. DSA is bad by its own words and actions. By the delegations it sends, the regimes it flatters, the platform it passes, and the radicals it keeps elevating. Cuomo basically tees Siddique up as young and plugged into the future of the party. Morgan comes off like a dinosaur. And if he is serious about taking back his party, whoever is advising him on how to talk about DSA is doing him no favors.

Stu Smith

22,489 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 DSA Top National Leader: “We’re Fighting To Have Worker Control Of Every Aspect Of Our Lives” — “There’s No Democracy in the Democratic Party” On the Progressive Victory stream, DSA National Political Committee Co-Chair Megan Romer — one of the two top figures in the organization alongside Ashik Siddique — says the quiet part out loud. “We’re not fighting for a kinder, gentler capitalism… we’re not fighting to soften the edges.” Instead, she lays out the real goal: “worker control of every aspect of our lives” — housing, workplaces, and communities. Romer also draws a hard line between DSA and the Democratic Party. She says there is “no democracy” in the Democratic Party, that it is run by donors and patronage networks, and contrasts that with DSA’s model of collective decision-making and explicitly socialist organizing. Then she makes the ideological break unmistakable: “We are explicitly socialist… we’re not the Democrats… stop calling us that.” That matters, because DSA is often treated as just another faction inside the broader Democratic coalition. Romer is saying the opposite. She is describing a separate political project with a separate theory of power. And she openly pitches DSA on those terms: not just voting every few years, but joining an organization where you can help decide campaigns, shape organizing priorities, and influence political direction yourself.

🚨 DSA Top National Leader: “We’re Fighting To Have Worker Control Of Every Aspect Of Our Lives” — “There’s No Democracy in the Democratic Party” On the Progressive Victory stream, DSA National Political Committee Co-Chair Megan Romer — one of the two top figures in the organization alongside Ashik Siddique — says the quiet part out loud. “We’re not fighting for a kinder, gentler capitalism… we’re not fighting to soften the edges.” Instead, she lays out the real goal: “worker control of every aspect of our lives” — housing, workplaces, and communities. Romer also draws a hard line between DSA and the Democratic Party. She says there is “no democracy” in the Democratic Party, that it is run by donors and patronage networks, and contrasts that with DSA’s model of collective decision-making and explicitly socialist organizing. Then she makes the ideological break unmistakable: “We are explicitly socialist… we’re not the Democrats… stop calling us that.” That matters, because DSA is often treated as just another faction inside the broader Democratic coalition. Romer is saying the opposite. She is describing a separate political project with a separate theory of power. And she openly pitches DSA on those terms: not just voting every few years, but joining an organization where you can help decide campaigns, shape organizing priorities, and influence political direction yourself.

Stu Smith

39,304 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 Inside DSA’s “Workers Deserve More” Socialism 2026 Panel: Abolish the Senate, Build “Militant” Unions, and Use a “Roadmap” to the “Big Thing” Not everyone is going to have time to sit through the full Hasan Piker panel on DSA’s “Workers Deserve More” program at Socialism 2026, so here are some of my favorite moments that really hammer home what DSA’s national leaders, with Hasan as hype man, say they are trying to build. DSA national co-chair Megan Romer says, “we know we’re not abolishing the Senate tomorrow.” Instead, the program is a “roadmap” for DSA politicians, chapters, and union organizers to push toward goals like social housing, moving “a little policy here and a little policy there” that can “eventually build up to this big thing.” Fellow national co-chair Ashik Siddique says DSA is “not formally a party, although we are functioning more and more like one,” while describing an internal debate ranging from formally breaking away and creating a new party to trying to “realign the Democratic Party.” Michaela Branagan, co-chair of the Workers Deserve More Program Committee, casually says, “we also talk about abolishing the Senate because who needs a Senate, right?” She also points to “powerful militant democratic unions” as part of DSA’s vision of what “real democracy” should look like. And when labor power comes up, Siddique points to the historical ability of organized workers “to shut down the economy” and says, “we need to rebuild labor power.” Are you ready to #TrySocialism yet? So is “the big thing” just DSA-speak for the revolution?

🚨 Inside DSA’s “Workers Deserve More” Socialism 2026 Panel: Abolish the Senate, Build “Militant” Unions, and Use a “Roadmap” to the “Big Thing” Not everyone is going to have time to sit through the full Hasan Piker panel on DSA’s “Workers Deserve More” program at Socialism 2026, so here are some of my favorite moments that really hammer home what DSA’s national leaders, with Hasan as hype man, say they are trying to build. DSA national co-chair Megan Romer says, “we know we’re not abolishing the Senate tomorrow.” Instead, the program is a “roadmap” for DSA politicians, chapters, and union organizers to push toward goals like social housing, moving “a little policy here and a little policy there” that can “eventually build up to this big thing.” Fellow national co-chair Ashik Siddique says DSA is “not formally a party, although we are functioning more and more like one,” while describing an internal debate ranging from formally breaking away and creating a new party to trying to “realign the Democratic Party.” Michaela Branagan, co-chair of the Workers Deserve More Program Committee, casually says, “we also talk about abolishing the Senate because who needs a Senate, right?” She also points to “powerful militant democratic unions” as part of DSA’s vision of what “real democracy” should look like. And when labor power comes up, Siddique points to the historical ability of organized workers “to shut down the economy” and says, “we need to rebuild labor power.” Are you ready to #TrySocialism yet? So is “the big thing” just DSA-speak for the revolution?

Stu Smith

34,934 次观看 • 21 天前

Andy Beshear was asked about the DSA yet again: “Right now the media is obsessed with the differences in the Democratic Party when the differences in the Democratic Party and the Republican Party are so stark” “DSA candidates and other democrats may disagree on the best way to provide healthcare, but we all want it to be accessible, while they [GOP] pass tax breaks for the wealthy they refuse to extend subsidies to everyday Americans

Andy Beshear was asked about the DSA yet again: “Right now the media is obsessed with the differences in the Democratic Party when the differences in the Democratic Party and the Republican Party are so stark” “DSA candidates and other democrats may disagree on the best way to provide healthcare, but we all want it to be accessible, while they [GOP] pass tax breaks for the wealthy they refuse to extend subsidies to everyday Americans

Beshear Operative

221,664 次观看 • 1 个月前

Watch this clip, and you’ll understand how the DSA machine works. Street agitators are recruited to run for office. Once elected, they are used to advance DSA’s extremist agenda. Their loyalty is not to voters or the Democratic Party, only to the DSA.

Watch this clip, and you’ll understand how the DSA machine works. Street agitators are recruited to run for office. Once elected, they are used to advance DSA’s extremist agenda. Their loyalty is not to voters or the Democratic Party, only to the DSA.

Canary Mission

531,372 次观看 • 3 个月前

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “Do you think, though, that there is room in the Democratic Party, under the tent of the Democratic Party, for Democratic Socialists? Is it big enough?” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY): “I DON’T support the DSA agenda as has been articulated by the DSA itself. Now, you’re going to have individual members who have been elected in Democratic primaries and if they are elected in the general in November will be part of the House Democratic Caucus. It’s going to be a broad caucus. There will be progressives. There will be New Dems. There will be Blue Dogs.”

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “Do you think, though, that there is room in the Democratic Party, under the tent of the Democratic Party, for Democratic Socialists? Is it big enough?” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY): “I DON’T support the DSA agenda as has been articulated by the DSA itself. Now, you’re going to have individual members who have been elected in Democratic primaries and if they are elected in the general in November will be part of the House Democratic Caucus. It’s going to be a broad caucus. There will be progressives. There will be New Dems. There will be Blue Dogs.”

RedWave Press

37,449 次观看 • 1 个月前

New York Times reporter Jeremy Peters admits to Bill Maher that the DSA’s stated goal is not only to take over the Democratic Party but to “take out the entire constitutional system.” Maher says what they really want is communism, and you don’t even have to dig deep to prove it. PETERS: “They’re not running to be members of the Democratic Party. They’re running, many of them anyway, as Democratic Socialists. It’s a totally different political organization. And in fact, they want to take out the Democratic Party. I mean, that’s their stated goal. They not only want to take out the Democratic Party, they want to take out the entire constitutional system that the Democratic Party is allowed to participate in governance.” MAHER: “And they like communism. I proved it here a couple of weeks ago just by quoting them. They use the word a lot. They’re not actually trying to hide it, although if you ask them they will deny it.” Cea Weaver, Zohran Mamdani's appointed tenant advocate have previously said things like: • “Elect more communists” • “Seize private property!” • “Private property, including and kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership, is a weapon of white supremacy…” When they tell you who they are, believe them.

New York Times reporter Jeremy Peters admits to Bill Maher that the DSA’s stated goal is not only to take over the Democratic Party but to “take out the entire constitutional system.” Maher says what they really want is communism, and you don’t even have to dig deep to prove it. PETERS: “They’re not running to be members of the Democratic Party. They’re running, many of them anyway, as Democratic Socialists. It’s a totally different political organization. And in fact, they want to take out the Democratic Party. I mean, that’s their stated goal. They not only want to take out the Democratic Party, they want to take out the entire constitutional system that the Democratic Party is allowed to participate in governance.” MAHER: “And they like communism. I proved it here a couple of weeks ago just by quoting them. They use the word a lot. They’re not actually trying to hide it, although if you ask them they will deny it.” Cea Weaver, Zohran Mamdani's appointed tenant advocate have previously said things like: • “Elect more communists” • “Seize private property!” • “Private property, including and kind of ESPECIALLY homeownership, is a weapon of white supremacy…” When they tell you who they are, believe them.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

391,714 次观看 • 1 个月前

"This is not a conservative party. It's a nihilistic party ... This is mind-bending to some people, in that, people I think who are younger, may not understand it, but the conservative party today is the Democratic Party. Because as Democrats, we are trying to preserve, to conserve the things that we have created."

"This is not a conservative party. It's a nihilistic party ... This is mind-bending to some people, in that, people I think who are younger, may not understand it, but the conservative party today is the Democratic Party. Because as Democrats, we are trying to preserve, to conserve the things that we have created."

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

50,203 次观看 • 6 个月前

In Tuesday’s Democratic primary for Colorado's 1st Congressional District, Ashik Siddique, co-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America, says the organization is looking to build on recent victories in New York City and Philadelphia, arguing voters are "fed up" with Democratic Party leadership.

In Tuesday’s Democratic primary for Colorado's 1st Congressional District, Ashik Siddique, co-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America, says the organization is looking to build on recent victories in New York City and Philadelphia, arguing voters are "fed up" with Democratic Party leadership.

CBS News

20,538 次观看 • 2 个月前

Isaac Reynolds of Southern Idaho DSA admits: “DSA is not the Democratic Party... our goal ultimately is to form a new party.” They’re not hiding it anymore. It’s a hostile takeover - and Mamdani is leading it in New York City

Isaac Reynolds of Southern Idaho DSA admits: “DSA is not the Democratic Party... our goal ultimately is to form a new party.” They’re not hiding it anymore. It’s a hostile takeover - and Mamdani is leading it in New York City

Canary Mission

457,692 次观看 • 11 个月前

Victor Davis Hanson says socialists didn’t take over the Democratic Party because the party was already moving in that direction, arguing Democrats gave the far-left the “blueprint” for its agenda: “They have a message that doesn’t appeal to anybody, and they’re very inbred, insular people. But I don’t think they took over the Democratic Party. I think the Democratic Party was socialist before they existed. And everything that they’re calling for, with a few exceptions, the Democratic Party has already been for and has already enacted. They destroyed the border. They want to pack the court. They want to destroy the Electoral College. They want to get new states. They want to destroy the filibuster. They want to defund the police. They endorsed BLM. That was the socialist agenda. But all they said was, ‘We want to join you guys because you’ve already given us a blueprint.’ And so that’s what they did. It’s incumbent upon Republicans to show that the Democratic Party no longer exists, Sean. It’s a socialist party, and they’ll try to disguise that in the primary and then disguise it in the election until they rule. And then they’ll turn out to be full-fledged Mamdanis when they’re elected.”

Victor Davis Hanson says socialists didn’t take over the Democratic Party because the party was already moving in that direction, arguing Democrats gave the far-left the “blueprint” for its agenda: “They have a message that doesn’t appeal to anybody, and they’re very inbred, insular people. But I don’t think they took over the Democratic Party. I think the Democratic Party was socialist before they existed. And everything that they’re calling for, with a few exceptions, the Democratic Party has already been for and has already enacted. They destroyed the border. They want to pack the court. They want to destroy the Electoral College. They want to get new states. They want to destroy the filibuster. They want to defund the police. They endorsed BLM. That was the socialist agenda. But all they said was, ‘We want to join you guys because you’ve already given us a blueprint.’ And so that’s what they did. It’s incumbent upon Republicans to show that the Democratic Party no longer exists, Sean. It’s a socialist party, and they’ll try to disguise that in the primary and then disguise it in the election until they rule. And then they’ll turn out to be full-fledged Mamdanis when they’re elected.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

224,071 次观看 • 17 天前

SOCIALIST SCHISM: Kevin McCarthy reacts to Sen Elissa Slotkin calling for new leadership in the Democratic party -- calling out Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer for failing to adapt. "What we're watching is a fight for the identity of the Democratic Party."

SOCIALIST SCHISM: Kevin McCarthy reacts to Sen Elissa Slotkin calling for new leadership in the Democratic party -- calling out Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer for failing to adapt. "What we're watching is a fight for the identity of the Democratic Party."

America's Newsroom

28,904 次观看 • 3 个月前

It turned philosophical. As Devine dove in deeper to Gabbard’s rise to where she’s sitting today, Devine asked Gabbard about her infamous departure from the Democratic Party, the party she once represented and even ran for president under. Gabbard let it all out. She said the modern Democratic Party has abandoned the Constitution entirely, and what we’re seeing now is a “spiritual problem” rooted in a rejection of objective truth. She saw it coming and says she was mocked for speaking out. “I remember, as I was running for president in 2020… I talked about wanting to revive kind of a new Democratic Party that would bring it back to our roots of fighting for the people, of fighting for free speech.” “And I was ridiculed. I was ridiculed at that Democratic event for having the audacity to say such things.” That was just five years ago. She says the party’s descent has only accelerated since then. “The Democratic Party has rapidly become far more extreme.” So where did things go so wrong? “You can point to a lot of different moments,” “But really fundamentally, the Democratic Party is not rooted in the Constitution.” What troubles her most is their denial of reality. “Their refusal, for example, to accept that there is such a thing as objective truth.” “We have people in the Democratic Party—almost everyone—who accepts this or promotes and propagates that there is no such thing as a man or a woman.” And it doesn’t stop there. “How is it that these people really don’t believe that there is such a thing as objective truth?” “Fundamentally, it’s a spiritual problem where they are putting themselves in the position of believing that they are God, and therefore they are the ones who designate what is true and what is not, what is right and what is wrong.” This was a total unmasking of her former party.

It turned philosophical. As Devine dove in deeper to Gabbard’s rise to where she’s sitting today, Devine asked Gabbard about her infamous departure from the Democratic Party, the party she once represented and even ran for president under. Gabbard let it all out. She said the modern Democratic Party has abandoned the Constitution entirely, and what we’re seeing now is a “spiritual problem” rooted in a rejection of objective truth. She saw it coming and says she was mocked for speaking out. “I remember, as I was running for president in 2020… I talked about wanting to revive kind of a new Democratic Party that would bring it back to our roots of fighting for the people, of fighting for free speech.” “And I was ridiculed. I was ridiculed at that Democratic event for having the audacity to say such things.” That was just five years ago. She says the party’s descent has only accelerated since then. “The Democratic Party has rapidly become far more extreme.” So where did things go so wrong? “You can point to a lot of different moments,” “But really fundamentally, the Democratic Party is not rooted in the Constitution.” What troubles her most is their denial of reality. “Their refusal, for example, to accept that there is such a thing as objective truth.” “We have people in the Democratic Party—almost everyone—who accepts this or promotes and propagates that there is no such thing as a man or a woman.” And it doesn’t stop there. “How is it that these people really don’t believe that there is such a thing as objective truth?” “Fundamentally, it’s a spiritual problem where they are putting themselves in the position of believing that they are God, and therefore they are the ones who designate what is true and what is not, what is right and what is wrong.” This was a total unmasking of her former party.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

136,136 次观看 • 1 年前