Dude knew the laws.

Textbook exactly how it's done

That is how you do that.... 🤘🤘🤘

Police believe that Terry v Ohio lowered the standard to stop someone to reasonable suspicion. It did not. It did say that if a person feels they are not allowed to leave, that they are seized for the purpose of the 4th and 5th amendment. Even if they are not in handcuffs.

American police frequently operate on the assumption that their badge overrides The Bill of Rights. It doesn’t, and too few people understand that.

He was well within his rights, and she tried to use her 'authority' instead of her brains. Folks often use the same tactics at DUI checkpoints, because it works.

It's okay to be pro-active but like he said, suspicion is not a crime!

Should still sue

Never say anything to the police, nothing, they write everything down in the report and they are very precise, they will use everything against you.

Then again, why so rude buddy?

Dude is wrong! They don’t have to charge him with anything to stop and question him. His refusal to answers ANY questions should permit them to detain him.