Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Duncan Trussell tells Theo Von why the horrifying stuff the algorithm feeds you is not an accident, and explains what it does to your brain. It starts with the phone in your hand. TRUSSELL: "All of us are staring into these hypno-rectangles. The algorithm, at least my algorithm, it's... showing me horrible things, people in the midst of psychotic episodes, people in the forest drinking their period blood." VON: "It's crazy dude. They're definitely scrambling our brains. Because you'll see like, genocidal killings of children, right?" VON: "But then immediately it's like 40% off these ASICS. It starts to confuse your brain, because your brain takes the depth of one that's so deep and one that means nothing at all, and puts them all in the same plane." Then Trussell takes it somewhere darker: TRUSSELL: "Public assassinations create trauma. Cultural trauma." TRUSSELL: "Did you notice, the Charlie Kirk assassination, everyone saw it before they shut it down. All of us had to watch that st happen. This produces trauma. The trauma response opens you up to conditioning. It's the same thing kidnappers use. It's the same thing people who torture you use. "They freak you the fk out so that you disassociate. You don't want to be there. You go into a sad, foggy place. And then in that place, they show you the ASICS commercial. In that place, they give you some propaganda. In that place, they give you a solution so this will never happen again. This is a known technique for mind-controlling people." TRUSSELL: "It's not just a power dynamic shift, it's a cultural dynamic shift. Because they inject that moment with however they want to shift the tide." VON: "Wow..." TRUSSELL: "So, Instagram, or any social media, is kind of doing this, but low-level." VON: "Microdosing it." TRUSSELL: "Yeah." Once you see the sequence, you can't unsee it.show more

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,976,063 subscribers

186,792 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Theo Von & Duncan Trussell just exposed algorithm mind control in real time: Public assassinations create massive cultural trauma → you disassociate in a foggy state → the algorithm immediately floods you with propaganda, “solutions,” and targeted ads (while your phone listens to your conversations). Duncan Trussell: “Public assassinations create trauma, cultural trauma. Charlie Kirk… everyone saw it before they shut it down. This produces trauma. The trauma response opens you up to conditioning. It’s the same shit kidnappers use… They freak you the fuck out so that you kind of disassociate… And then in that place, they show you the commercial. In that place, they give you some propaganda… This is a known technique for mind controlling people.” “Your phone is the f--ing vampire, and you’re inviting it in every time you stare at it.”

Theo Von & Duncan Trussell just exposed algorithm mind control in real time: Public assassinations create massive cultural trauma → you disassociate in a foggy state → the algorithm immediately floods you with propaganda, “solutions,” and targeted ads (while your phone listens to your conversations). Duncan Trussell: “Public assassinations create trauma, cultural trauma. Charlie Kirk… everyone saw it before they shut it down. This produces trauma. The trauma response opens you up to conditioning. It’s the same shit kidnappers use… They freak you the fuck out so that you kind of disassociate… And then in that place, they show you the commercial. In that place, they give you some propaganda… This is a known technique for mind controlling people.” “Your phone is the f--ing vampire, and you’re inviting it in every time you stare at it.”

Defiant Ghost

50,941 views • 2 months ago

Duncan Trussell just warned Theo Von that algorithms are more dark and sinister than you think. “All of us are staring into these hypno-rectangles.” They’re MKUltra-type mind control tools. “They’re scrambling our brains!” Trussell: “There’s various frequencies that exist on planet Earth.” “There’s frequencies that create power dynamics, that create authoritarianism, tyranny, fascism, cruelty, war.” “And the more you tune into that frequency, the more your shape changes, so to speak.” Von: “Instead of tuning into no frequency, where I’m just at the whims of the fucking exhaust of the corporate universe we live in … what if I spent time tapping into a frequency that actually brought me some peace?” “You’ll see, like, genocidal killings of children.” But the mind control techniques being weaponized against us get even darker. Trussell: “Kurt Metzger says public assassinations create cultural trauma.” “Did you notice the Charlie Kirk assassination, everyone saw it before they shut it down?” “This produces trauma.” “The trauma response opens you up to conditioning.” “This is a known technique for mind controlling people.” “Instagram or any social media is kind of doing this, but low level.” Von: “You’re microdosing it.” Trussell: “Exactly.” Theo Von Duncan Trussell

Duncan Trussell just warned Theo Von that algorithms are more dark and sinister than you think. “All of us are staring into these hypno-rectangles.” They’re MKUltra-type mind control tools. “They’re scrambling our brains!” Trussell: “There’s various frequencies that exist on planet Earth.” “There’s frequencies that create power dynamics, that create authoritarianism, tyranny, fascism, cruelty, war.” “And the more you tune into that frequency, the more your shape changes, so to speak.” Von: “Instead of tuning into no frequency, where I’m just at the whims of the fucking exhaust of the corporate universe we live in … what if I spent time tapping into a frequency that actually brought me some peace?” “You’ll see, like, genocidal killings of children.” But the mind control techniques being weaponized against us get even darker. Trussell: “Kurt Metzger says public assassinations create cultural trauma.” “Did you notice the Charlie Kirk assassination, everyone saw it before they shut it down?” “This produces trauma.” “The trauma response opens you up to conditioning.” “This is a known technique for mind controlling people.” “Instagram or any social media is kind of doing this, but low level.” Von: “You’re microdosing it.” Trussell: “Exactly.” Theo Von Duncan Trussell

Holden Culotta

42,658 views • 2 months ago

Joe Rogan is convinced that the truth about ancient civilizations is covered up to hide a much darker secret: The pole shift. Duncan Trussell: “Do you buy into the conspiracy theory that it’s covered up because they don’t want us to know about this inevitable global reset?” Rogan: “Yeah.” “It seems like some sort of event happens when the magnetic poles switch.” “All of a sudden the earth just does a gyro and spins on its head.” “And then what happens?” Joe Rogan Duncan Trussell

Joe Rogan is convinced that the truth about ancient civilizations is covered up to hide a much darker secret: The pole shift. Duncan Trussell: “Do you buy into the conspiracy theory that it’s covered up because they don’t want us to know about this inevitable global reset?” Rogan: “Yeah.” “It seems like some sort of event happens when the magnetic poles switch.” “All of a sudden the earth just does a gyro and spins on its head.” “And then what happens?” Joe Rogan Duncan Trussell

Holden Culotta

524,205 views • 5 months ago

This is why the BC Ostrich Farm matters. It shows clearly that the government has abandoned reason, logic, and fairness. It shows that what they say goes, no matter what they have to take from you to do it or how many years you spent creating the thing they will eagerly destroy. They don't care about proving themselves. They care about doing it and shutting you up. They'll go so far as to throw you in jail to shut you up and they'll create laws to criminalize all speech they don't like. They'll even create laws to kick you off the internet without any due process and make you sign an NDA so you can't tell anyone what happened. They fear your voice. They'll take over your property and build a ridiculous wall of hay to block the world from seeing and rightly questioning the cruelty of what they're doing. They'll make no fly zones so you can't fly a drone and see. They'll harass veterans who dare to even point out to them that they're breaking the law and then they'll bark back that they are the law and what they say goes. It doesn't matter if it's different than what they said ten minutes ago. If they say it, it's true. So shut up and be quiet. They'll fund radical groups to target people they don't like and they'll use circular reporting from the groups they fund to weakly prop up their atrocious disregard for our rights and freedoms. And they'll look you in the face the whole time and tell you that it's for your own good. It's for all of our good. It's for our good that your life's work is destroyed. It's for our good that your speech is silenced. It's for our good that you're thrown in jail to silence you while repeat criminals walk in and out of the court house without even spending a week in jail. It's certainly for their good. Not for our country's. Not for yours. That's why the ostrich farm matters. It shows all of this so clearly in a way that any amount of words never could. And the world needs to see it.

This is why the BC Ostrich Farm matters. It shows clearly that the government has abandoned reason, logic, and fairness. It shows that what they say goes, no matter what they have to take from you to do it or how many years you spent creating the thing they will eagerly destroy. They don't care about proving themselves. They care about doing it and shutting you up. They'll go so far as to throw you in jail to shut you up and they'll create laws to criminalize all speech they don't like. They'll even create laws to kick you off the internet without any due process and make you sign an NDA so you can't tell anyone what happened. They fear your voice. They'll take over your property and build a ridiculous wall of hay to block the world from seeing and rightly questioning the cruelty of what they're doing. They'll make no fly zones so you can't fly a drone and see. They'll harass veterans who dare to even point out to them that they're breaking the law and then they'll bark back that they are the law and what they say goes. It doesn't matter if it's different than what they said ten minutes ago. If they say it, it's true. So shut up and be quiet. They'll fund radical groups to target people they don't like and they'll use circular reporting from the groups they fund to weakly prop up their atrocious disregard for our rights and freedoms. And they'll look you in the face the whole time and tell you that it's for your own good. It's for all of our good. It's for our good that your life's work is destroyed. It's for our good that your speech is silenced. It's for our good that you're thrown in jail to silence you while repeat criminals walk in and out of the court house without even spending a week in jail. It's certainly for their good. Not for our country's. Not for yours. That's why the ostrich farm matters. It shows all of this so clearly in a way that any amount of words never could. And the world needs to see it.

Jon Villeneuve

42,910 views • 1 year ago

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "How crazy is it that Biden deported 1.49 million while letting in 20?" "Like, what do you think they were doing!?" "I know there was also efforts to move people to specific states so that you can get a larger number for the census so you get more congressional seats." "This is a dark thing that people don't want to admit because they're a dyed-in-the-wool Democrat." "I had a conversation with my parents about it and they're like, 'No!' I'm like, 'Yes! It's about congressional seats. It's like, the census counts illegals!'" "And not only that, they're trying to make it so that those people can vote!" "And if you can make it so that those people can vote, then all of the sudden you ship these people to a place, you give them EBT cards, you get them on food stamps, you give them Medicaid money — they have money." "And now, who are you going to vote for? You're going to vote for the people who got you money!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

259,092 views • 1 year ago

we all dream of those big wins in life the 100x, the multi-million dollar trade, or even just 10x of what you started with in 7 days i’ve been fortunate enough to experience a few of those over the past few years, and the reality is when you do win big, it doesn’t feel like it at all it hits for a split second, and then your brain just normalizes it it's a part of how to get there in the first place, but makes it a lot easier to lose it if you don't have the right guardrails in place and in that exact moment, you being even keeled doesn’t mean the number in front of you isn’t life changing it is this is where you have to slow down a bit, breathe, settle your mind don’t just roll it into some bullshit take some off the table, step away for a few days if you have to, funny enough, blowing let's say 10k of it on a beautiful trip to tokyo will save you so much because once you actually process what just happened, your future self will thank you for it the truth is, even if you think you’re going for a certain number, the moment you hit it, you’ll want more and more, and more anyone who's been in the same position will tell you the exact same thing ironically the people that win are addicted to winning and if you ask the same people in a year after that big win, what they regret and where are they proud of themselves? they will tell you they regretted rolling it over and giving some/all back or they are proud for switching back on the switch all of this is real, but it’s also exactly how i imagined it would feel years ago before it ever happened manifest your life, the feeling not just the number everything happens twice, first in your mind, then in reality

we all dream of those big wins in life the 100x, the multi-million dollar trade, or even just 10x of what you started with in 7 days i’ve been fortunate enough to experience a few of those over the past few years, and the reality is when you do win big, it doesn’t feel like it at all it hits for a split second, and then your brain just normalizes it it's a part of how to get there in the first place, but makes it a lot easier to lose it if you don't have the right guardrails in place and in that exact moment, you being even keeled doesn’t mean the number in front of you isn’t life changing it is this is where you have to slow down a bit, breathe, settle your mind don’t just roll it into some bullshit take some off the table, step away for a few days if you have to, funny enough, blowing let's say 10k of it on a beautiful trip to tokyo will save you so much because once you actually process what just happened, your future self will thank you for it the truth is, even if you think you’re going for a certain number, the moment you hit it, you’ll want more and more, and more anyone who's been in the same position will tell you the exact same thing ironically the people that win are addicted to winning and if you ask the same people in a year after that big win, what they regret and where are they proud of themselves? they will tell you they regretted rolling it over and giving some/all back or they are proud for switching back on the switch all of this is real, but it’s also exactly how i imagined it would feel years ago before it ever happened manifest your life, the feeling not just the number everything happens twice, first in your mind, then in reality

۟

23,017 views • 4 months ago

Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes the goal of "The Great Taking" "it's much darker than [they] just want to control people... It is about destroying populations... It's that they intend that you will not exist" "It's not that they need your stuff. They can create unlimited amounts of money" "It's not that they need your stuff or your money. It's that they do not want you to have have your stuff and your money" "It is about subjugation of populations" "It's even worse than being about control. Because they have control now. They have total control now" "So what is happening now is beyond having total control" "It is about destroying populations" "So it's much darker than that [they] just want to control people" "First people think it's that they want to make money. No, it's much worse than that. [Then they think] it's that they want control—no, it's much worse than that. It's that they intend that you will not exist" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026.

Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes the goal of "The Great Taking" "it's much darker than [they] just want to control people... It is about destroying populations... It's that they intend that you will not exist" "It's not that they need your stuff. They can create unlimited amounts of money" "It's not that they need your stuff or your money. It's that they do not want you to have have your stuff and your money" "It is about subjugation of populations" "It's even worse than being about control. Because they have control now. They have total control now" "So what is happening now is beyond having total control" "It is about destroying populations" "So it's much darker than that [they] just want to control people" "First people think it's that they want to make money. No, it's much worse than that. [Then they think] it's that they want control—no, it's much worse than that. It's that they intend that you will not exist" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026.

Sense Receptor

104,427 views • 2 months ago

This is so simple. You go to Europe, you take an American product, you sell it in Italy and they whack a 13 to 15% VAT tax, consumer tax. Then you go to the airport, you get your money back, of which 1% people do. Same in Canada, same in Mexico, England, Switzerland, all the same. All that Trump has done, 'cause we never had consumer taxes in the US, you can't get that through Congress, he calls it a tariff. Reciprocal and kind of the highlight deal right now is the EU. You ship something over here from Europe, you pay the same thing they whack an American product with. It's not that complicated. This is not an ad for Trump. I'm an investor. Something's working here. It's a policy decision. I'm a policy guy. The Europeans have been sucking 15% cash for 40 years out of America and you're unhappy that we're doing the same thing to them? I don't think so. Get over it. Breathe the oxygen and be happy with your portfolio.

This is so simple. You go to Europe, you take an American product, you sell it in Italy and they whack a 13 to 15% VAT tax, consumer tax. Then you go to the airport, you get your money back, of which 1% people do. Same in Canada, same in Mexico, England, Switzerland, all the same. All that Trump has done, 'cause we never had consumer taxes in the US, you can't get that through Congress, he calls it a tariff. Reciprocal and kind of the highlight deal right now is the EU. You ship something over here from Europe, you pay the same thing they whack an American product with. It's not that complicated. This is not an ad for Trump. I'm an investor. Something's working here. It's a policy decision. I'm a policy guy. The Europeans have been sucking 15% cash for 40 years out of America and you're unhappy that we're doing the same thing to them? I don't think so. Get over it. Breathe the oxygen and be happy with your portfolio.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

1,955,320 views • 1 year ago

🚨 WOW! Stephen Miller just exposed it: "Some people might not like what I'm about to say, but it has to be said. You have the Left continue in its professional associations like nursing and doctors and education — people who casually CHEER ASSASSINATIONS." "Their conversation is: 'I'm glad that so and so was shot,' or 'I'm mad that so and so didn't finish the job.'" "This is common now in white-collar professions that are controlled by Democrat credentialing bodies, is it creates this kind of person." "And it's SICK, and when you see it online, you see it also in left-wing comedy where they cheer and they laugh and they joke and they all have a good time talking about our friends getting m*rdered!" "It's really fundamentally the normalization of assassination — and if we don't deal with this, we're in for a world of pain and a world of HURT." "It's just, it's sickening and it's heinous and it's just repugnant in every single way. But this gets back to the theme that I'm presenting today, which is that the third worldification of American politics is the normalization of assassination." "It's the normalization of the idea that assassinations are a common expression of disagreement. It is one of the most vile, horrible, evil society destroying things that can possibly happen to a country." Stephen Miller Will Cain

🚨 WOW! Stephen Miller just exposed it: "Some people might not like what I'm about to say, but it has to be said. You have the Left continue in its professional associations like nursing and doctors and education — people who casually CHEER ASSASSINATIONS." "Their conversation is: 'I'm glad that so and so was shot,' or 'I'm mad that so and so didn't finish the job.'" "This is common now in white-collar professions that are controlled by Democrat credentialing bodies, is it creates this kind of person." "And it's SICK, and when you see it online, you see it also in left-wing comedy where they cheer and they laugh and they joke and they all have a good time talking about our friends getting m*rdered!" "It's really fundamentally the normalization of assassination — and if we don't deal with this, we're in for a world of pain and a world of HURT." "It's just, it's sickening and it's heinous and it's just repugnant in every single way. But this gets back to the theme that I'm presenting today, which is that the third worldification of American politics is the normalization of assassination." "It's the normalization of the idea that assassinations are a common expression of disagreement. It is one of the most vile, horrible, evil society destroying things that can possibly happen to a country." Stephen Miller Will Cain

Eric Daugherty

100,938 views • 4 months ago

$I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.$

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

17,098 views • 5 months ago

Jack Perez on "Wild Things 2" (2004): "This film is about mercenary characters doing everything and anything they can to get what they want. This is a movie that knows what it is. It is a self-aware thriller and that means, it has all the requisite thrills, violence & s € x- but it is slightly over the top and it knows it's over the top and that's part of the fun of it. This movie is kind of like a big comic book it's not enormously deep. (...) It's got a lot of sh!t in it. It's got all the stuff that you that you want in a picture like this and it's coming at you at a hundred miles an hour. That's the point of the movie." ("Wild Things II: Making the Glades", 2004)

Jack Perez on "Wild Things 2" (2004): "This film is about mercenary characters doing everything and anything they can to get what they want. This is a movie that knows what it is. It is a self-aware thriller and that means, it has all the requisite thrills, violence & s € x- but it is slightly over the top and it knows it's over the top and that's part of the fun of it. This movie is kind of like a big comic book it's not enormously deep. (...) It's got a lot of sh!t in it. It's got all the stuff that you that you want in a picture like this and it's coming at you at a hundred miles an hour. That's the point of the movie." ("Wild Things II: Making the Glades", 2004)

DepressedBergman

11,829 views • 1 month ago

Alex Jones: "Overall, I've been supportive of Trump because he was disruptive of the globalists... but more and more, it looks like he's pretty much starting to join them... [and now] we're being slept walked into full war with Iran. I think it's bad." This clip of Jones (Alex Jones) is taken from a discussion with Duncan Trussell (Duncan Trussell) posted to The Duncan Trussell Family Hour YouTube channel on March 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Jones: "The first rule of intelligence is whatever you first are told isn't true..." Trussell: "So what do you think is going on over there? What's your analysis of this?" Jones: "Well, you have to always go to original war doctrine, the Iranian war doctrine, Israel's war doctrine, the US War doctrine, China's war doctrine, Russia's war doctrine, and the other parties involved, like North Korea. And then out of that war doctrine, and my sources already previously had, we knew what the plan was decapitate... First they need to decapitate the Iranians, Iranian leadership, then destroy their air defenses, then destroy their main military and their navy. So that's pretty much happening. "But Trump said nine months ago in June, this is about taking out their nuclear sites. That wasn't true. That was just getting us used to this. And so now it is about basically sleepwalking us into a full war. "Now today, Trump said he may support boots on the ground. And so overall, I've been supportive of Trump because he was disruptive of the globalists, they didn't want him at first. "But more and more, it looks like he's pretty much starting to join them. And so just like NATO and the EU slept walked us into war with Russia, we're being slept walked into full war with Iran. I think it's bad." Trussell: "What happens to American presidents? What the fuck is it that happens that inevitably, no matter what they say, inevitably they just turn into the same person. They just turn into somebody who's gonna drop bombs somewhere in the Middle East?" Jones: "They had the very best CIA briefers, the very best psychologists. They keep them up, they give them threats. They put this responsibility on them that there's imminent doom, and then they just know how to psychologically manipulate them."

Alex Jones: "Overall, I've been supportive of Trump because he was disruptive of the globalists... but more and more, it looks like he's pretty much starting to join them... [and now] we're being slept walked into full war with Iran. I think it's bad." This clip of Jones (Alex Jones) is taken from a discussion with Duncan Trussell (Duncan Trussell) posted to The Duncan Trussell Family Hour YouTube channel on March 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Jones: "The first rule of intelligence is whatever you first are told isn't true..." Trussell: "So what do you think is going on over there? What's your analysis of this?" Jones: "Well, you have to always go to original war doctrine, the Iranian war doctrine, Israel's war doctrine, the US War doctrine, China's war doctrine, Russia's war doctrine, and the other parties involved, like North Korea. And then out of that war doctrine, and my sources already previously had, we knew what the plan was decapitate... First they need to decapitate the Iranians, Iranian leadership, then destroy their air defenses, then destroy their main military and their navy. So that's pretty much happening. "But Trump said nine months ago in June, this is about taking out their nuclear sites. That wasn't true. That was just getting us used to this. And so now it is about basically sleepwalking us into a full war. "Now today, Trump said he may support boots on the ground. And so overall, I've been supportive of Trump because he was disruptive of the globalists, they didn't want him at first. "But more and more, it looks like he's pretty much starting to join them. And so just like NATO and the EU slept walked us into war with Russia, we're being slept walked into full war with Iran. I think it's bad." Trussell: "What happens to American presidents? What the fuck is it that happens that inevitably, no matter what they say, inevitably they just turn into the same person. They just turn into somebody who's gonna drop bombs somewhere in the Middle East?" Jones: "They had the very best CIA briefers, the very best psychologists. They keep them up, they give them threats. They put this responsibility on them that there's imminent doom, and then they just know how to psychologically manipulate them."

Sense Receptor

47,449 views • 6 months ago

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,378 views • 3 years ago

“Fuck war, fuck the military-industrial complex.” “You can label me whatever the fuck you want.” “We all know it’s an oligarchy.” “Our fucking representatives are getting loaded on stock market trades.” Joe Rogan and Duncan Trussell just slammed the endless war machine that controls both the Republican and Democrat parties. Trussell: “They’ve done such a shoddy job of even seeming like someone who deserves any respect or power that I think a lot of people have really become blackpilled when it comes to … claiming to represent their constituents.” “That’s not happening.” “We all know that now.” “Once we can all shake off the left/right bullshit and just realize we don’t want to burn people to death in other countries anymore—” Rogan: “Not only that, the whole chaos that they’re experiencing in their country is probably a direct result of US intervention … when they overthrew governments.” “If I was gonna keep my business running, if I’m in the business of collecting trash, I want to make sure the people have trash.” “Their business is blowing people up, making weapons, selling weapons, arming other countries so they can go to war with each other.” Trussell: “We need an actual revival in this country … where humans reconnect with what’s important.” Duncan Trussell Joe Rogan

“Fuck war, fuck the military-industrial complex.” “You can label me whatever the fuck you want.” “We all know it’s an oligarchy.” “Our fucking representatives are getting loaded on stock market trades.” Joe Rogan and Duncan Trussell just slammed the endless war machine that controls both the Republican and Democrat parties. Trussell: “They’ve done such a shoddy job of even seeming like someone who deserves any respect or power that I think a lot of people have really become blackpilled when it comes to … claiming to represent their constituents.” “That’s not happening.” “We all know that now.” “Once we can all shake off the left/right bullshit and just realize we don’t want to burn people to death in other countries anymore—” Rogan: “Not only that, the whole chaos that they’re experiencing in their country is probably a direct result of US intervention … when they overthrew governments.” “If I was gonna keep my business running, if I’m in the business of collecting trash, I want to make sure the people have trash.” “Their business is blowing people up, making weapons, selling weapons, arming other countries so they can go to war with each other.” Trussell: “We need an actual revival in this country … where humans reconnect with what’s important.” Duncan Trussell Joe Rogan

Holden Culotta

83,981 views • 5 months ago

THE GAME IS RIGGED AND NOBODY SEEMS TO NOTICE They own everything. They own all the important land. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your Social Security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back. So they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later. Because they own this fucking place. It's a big club. And you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club. By the way, it's the same big club they used to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. The table is tilted, folks. The game is rigged. And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hard-working people. White collar, blue collar, doesn't matter what colour shirt you have on. Good, honest, hard-working people continue. These are people of modest means. Continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don't give a fuck about them. They don't give a fuck about you. They don't give a fuck about you. They don't care about you at all. At all. At all. And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. That's what the owners count on. The fact that Americans will probably remain wilfully ignorant of the big red, white, and blue dick that's being jammed up their arseholes every day. Because the owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American dream. Because you have to be asleep to believe it. ~ George Carlin ✨🙌🏾💫

THE GAME IS RIGGED AND NOBODY SEEMS TO NOTICE They own everything. They own all the important land. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else. But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your Social Security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back. So they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later. Because they own this fucking place. It's a big club. And you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club. By the way, it's the same big club they used to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. The table is tilted, folks. The game is rigged. And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hard-working people. White collar, blue collar, doesn't matter what colour shirt you have on. Good, honest, hard-working people continue. These are people of modest means. Continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don't give a fuck about them. They don't give a fuck about you. They don't give a fuck about you. They don't care about you at all. At all. At all. And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. That's what the owners count on. The fact that Americans will probably remain wilfully ignorant of the big red, white, and blue dick that's being jammed up their arseholes every day. Because the owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American dream. Because you have to be asleep to believe it. ~ George Carlin ✨🙌🏾💫

🧬Maxpein🧬

56,661 views • 6 months ago

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 views • 3 months ago