Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

During a contentious exchange with Sen. Adam Schiff, Pam Bondi repeatedly declined to answer whether she would open an investigation into special counsel Jack Smith before suggesting his conduct was "horrible."

ABC News

18,311,278 subscribers

31,373 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Shitposti Nakamoto1 year ago

Schiff was trying to get a ‘Gotcha’ moment. She didn’t waiver. January 20th can’t get her soon enough

TopStoryContent1 year ago

Police Officer Demands Woman Open Her Trunk, He Has No Idea It's Caught on Video:

True View1 year ago

Actually, that’s not what she said… Misinformation… Ironic that the left has always said they fear it from the right… Yet it’s always the left. That’s pushing this information forward… Pam Bondy said that she will follow the law in all cases… She was saying that she could not give definitive answers to hypothetical questions without looking at all the facts… And she is right… Every attorney in the world knows that she’s right. Including Adam Schiff.

Tost1 year ago

Adam schiff is a creep just like his buddy ed buck

🥂1 year ago

She’s an embarrassment to women. This the best maga can do?

The Arborist1 year ago

Aren’t criminals usually investigated before a prosecution?

The ACKSHUAL $ub$tance1 year ago

When she inevitably opens up a case against Jack Smith (and other Dem officials), just remember that she represents party who cried foul and made a big stink over law fare being waged.

John Bundick1 year ago

And...?

Used Czar Salesman1 year ago

Adam is a piece of Schiff 💩

Dan1 year ago

We pray she throws his ass in jail

John1 year ago

Adam is rude and not professional.

Related Videos

Here is a video of POTUS Trump calling Jack Smith “a moron”. The Office of Special Counsel just opened an investigation into Jack. They fired dozens of officials involved with Jack’s team. Jack Smith did not receive a pardon. Not looking good for Jack!

Here is a video of POTUS Trump calling Jack Smith “a moron”. The Office of Special Counsel just opened an investigation into Jack. They fired dozens of officials involved with Jack’s team. Jack Smith did not receive a pardon. Not looking good for Jack!

C3

90,924 views • 1 year ago

Phillip: What does Trump want to prosecute Jack Smith for? Lyman: He said he wants Pam Bondi to look into it. Phillip: Why would that involve prosecuting Jack Smith? Lyman: He didn’t say prosecute Scheindlin: He said for perjury Lyman: Ok, if Pam Bondi is as good as an Attorney General that Trump thinks she is, she will decide that’s not a reasonable charge.

Phillip: What does Trump want to prosecute Jack Smith for? Lyman: He said he wants Pam Bondi to look into it. Phillip: Why would that involve prosecuting Jack Smith? Lyman: He didn’t say prosecute Scheindlin: He said for perjury Lyman: Ok, if Pam Bondi is as good as an Attorney General that Trump thinks she is, she will decide that’s not a reasonable charge.

Acyn

336,127 views • 8 months ago

Former special counsel Jack Smith was pressed by Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) on Tuesday during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee about whether he attended a NBA game between the Atlanta Hawks and Golden State Warriors in Atlanta in early February 2024. Smith said he “definitely did not go" to an Atlanta Hawks game. "I think you've already perjured yourself," Schitt said during the exchange, calling Smith a "total dirtbag." Smith said he instead attended a Maryland-Iowa women’s basketball game to see Iowa star Caitlin Clark play. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) suggested Schmitt had confused the Iowa Hawkeyes with the Atlanta Hawks and said Smith deserved an apology.

Former special counsel Jack Smith was pressed by Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) on Tuesday during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee about whether he attended a NBA game between the Atlanta Hawks and Golden State Warriors in Atlanta in early February 2024. Smith said he “definitely did not go" to an Atlanta Hawks game. "I think you've already perjured yourself," Schitt said during the exchange, calling Smith a "total dirtbag." Smith said he instead attended a Maryland-Iowa women’s basketball game to see Iowa star Caitlin Clark play. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) suggested Schmitt had confused the Iowa Hawkeyes with the Atlanta Hawks and said Smith deserved an apology.

CBS News

542,988 views • 4 days ago

Sen. COONS: Was it important for you to work with Republicans during your investigation? Former Special Counsel Jack Smith: Donald Trump preyed on party loyalty and fear. The strongest witnesses were Republicans, people like Rusty Bowers and Mike Pence, who did the right thing.

Sen. COONS: Was it important for you to work with Republicans during your investigation? Former Special Counsel Jack Smith: Donald Trump preyed on party loyalty and fear. The strongest witnesses were Republicans, people like Rusty Bowers and Mike Pence, who did the right thing.

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

31,217 views • 4 days ago

In November 2022, Jack Smith was sworn in as Special Counsel. Eleven months later, Merrick Garland administered a second oath. Was Jack an illegitimate prosecutor during those first 11 months? Americans deserve to know.

In November 2022, Jack Smith was sworn in as Special Counsel. Eleven months later, Merrick Garland administered a second oath. Was Jack an illegitimate prosecutor during those first 11 months? Americans deserve to know.

Lance Gooden

23,331 views • 8 months ago

Interesting: conservative judge J. Michael Luttig says Special Counsel Jack Smith would have needed to wait for the SCOTUS decision on the independent state legislature theory today before deciding whether to proceed with charges against Trump and/or his allies related to Jan. 6

Interesting: conservative judge J. Michael Luttig says Special Counsel Jack Smith would have needed to wait for the SCOTUS decision on the independent state legislature theory today before deciding whether to proceed with charges against Trump and/or his allies related to Jan. 6

Abby D. Phillip

2,253,890 views • 3 years ago

"You make me want to throw up in my mouth," Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said to former special counsel Jack Smith after asking him about the toll records from senators' phones that he received. Smith is testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into his probes of President Trump.

"You make me want to throw up in my mouth," Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said to former special counsel Jack Smith after asking him about the toll records from senators' phones that he received. Smith is testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into his probes of President Trump.

CBS News

91,175 views • 4 days ago

“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers as he defended his decision to prosecute Trump. Testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith said he stands by his decision to bring charges and would do so again based on the same facts, “regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.”

“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” former special counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers as he defended his decision to prosecute Trump. Testifying Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Smith said he stands by his decision to bring charges and would do so again based on the same facts, “regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.”

CBS News

432,803 views • 4 days ago

Disgraced former special counsel Jack Smith just told the entire Senate Judiciary Committee that he would prosecute President Trump again. SMITH: “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.” Smith is also claiming that he approached his role as special counsel as a nonpartisan actor, free of political bias. No one’s buying that. Smith is standing by his entire prosecution of Trump. This is the hill he’s chosen to die on.

Disgraced former special counsel Jack Smith just told the entire Senate Judiciary Committee that he would prosecute President Trump again. SMITH: “If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.” Smith is also claiming that he approached his role as special counsel as a nonpartisan actor, free of political bias. No one’s buying that. Smith is standing by his entire prosecution of Trump. This is the hill he’s chosen to die on.

Overton

22,579 views • 4 days ago

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Charlie Kirk

578,773 views • 3 years ago

.@NBCNEWS EXCLUSIVE: Special Counsel Jack Smith did not respond to my questions about a coming indictment or his ongoing investigation as he entered his Washington, D.C. office this morning. Smith has kept a low profile in a building far from Main Justice during his time as SC

Gary Grumbach

393,375 views • 3 years ago

This may be the most uncomfortable moment in the entire Jack Smith hearing. It's when Sen. Kennedy confronted him about an accusation that Smith had actually asked Garland for the job of Special Counsel. Hoo boy. Watch Smith squirm as he tries to answer the question. KENNEDY: You asked General Garland to appoint you special counsel, didn't you? SMITH (looks down and scribbles): I don't think that's accurate. He made the decision to appoint me. KENNEDY: In fact, you had people call General Garland to lobby him to appoint you, didn't you? SMITH (looks down and scribbles some more): I don't recall anything like that. KENNEDY: You really wanted to be special counsel, didn't you? SMITH: I accepted the position as special counsel because I had spent 30 years as a nonpartisan prosecutor. I had investigated every sort of criminal case you could possibly imagine, and I thought I was qualified to do the job. I knew that I would do it independently, and I would conduct it the same way whether it were Republican or a Democrat. if Smith wanted to be Special Counsel and had lobbied for that position, it throws all of his partisan activities in a whole new light. As it stands, this looks horrible.

This may be the most uncomfortable moment in the entire Jack Smith hearing. It's when Sen. Kennedy confronted him about an accusation that Smith had actually asked Garland for the job of Special Counsel. Hoo boy. Watch Smith squirm as he tries to answer the question. KENNEDY: You asked General Garland to appoint you special counsel, didn't you? SMITH (looks down and scribbles): I don't think that's accurate. He made the decision to appoint me. KENNEDY: In fact, you had people call General Garland to lobby him to appoint you, didn't you? SMITH (looks down and scribbles some more): I don't recall anything like that. KENNEDY: You really wanted to be special counsel, didn't you? SMITH: I accepted the position as special counsel because I had spent 30 years as a nonpartisan prosecutor. I had investigated every sort of criminal case you could possibly imagine, and I thought I was qualified to do the job. I knew that I would do it independently, and I would conduct it the same way whether it were Republican or a Democrat. if Smith wanted to be Special Counsel and had lobbied for that position, it throws all of his partisan activities in a whole new light. As it stands, this looks horrible.

Kyle Becker

174,670 views • 4 days ago

Sen. SCHIFF: Senator Durbin asked a very appropriate oversight question, and Pam Bondi’s response was to attack his character and insult him. Senator Whitehouse did the same with a perfectly legitimate oversight question, and Pam Bondi attacked him personally. Others, too.

Sen. SCHIFF: Senator Durbin asked a very appropriate oversight question, and Pam Bondi’s response was to attack his character and insult him. Senator Whitehouse did the same with a perfectly legitimate oversight question, and Pam Bondi attacked him personally. Others, too.

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

119,060 views • 11 months ago