Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

During a webinar aimed at school administrators on the Mirabelli decision, a partner at a leading law firm that advises California school districts stated that existing policies and practices regarding staff use of students’ preferred names and pronouns “remain 100% in place.” The state has long taken the position...

LauraPowellEsq's profile picture

Laura Powell

84,447 subscribers

32,961 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The Supreme Court rules against Democrats and sides with parents “The Supreme Court is ruled on California policy regarding the notification of parents surrounding their child's gender identity. Today's ruling overturns a state law which prevented schools from notifying parents if students changed their pronouns or gender expression at school.” “This comes after some religious parents and educators challenge California school policies aimed at preventing schools from outing students to their families. California argued students have the right to privacy over their gender expression, especially if they fear rejection from their families.”
0:36

The Supreme Court rules against Democrats and sides with parents “The Supreme Court is ruled on California policy regarding the notification of parents surrounding their child's gender identity. Today's ruling overturns a state law which prevented schools from notifying parents if students changed their pronouns or gender expression at school.” “This comes after some religious parents and educators challenge California school policies aimed at preventing schools from outing students to their families. California argued students have the right to privacy over their gender expression, especially if they fear rejection from their families.”

Wall Street Apes

45,671 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dean of Berkeley Law School and prominent constitutional law scholar Erwin Chemerinsky mischaracterized the Mirabelli v. Bonta case during a recent talk in San Francisco. He began by stating, “California has a law that prohibits schools from informing parents about their children’s gender identity without the permission of the children.” He was referring to AB 1955, which prohibits school districts from adopting policies that require disclosure. The state itself has repeatedly argued that the law does not prohibit school employees from informing parents; instead it bars districts from requiring them to do so. Importantly, Mirabelli was filed before AB 1955, and the lawsuit does not directly challenge that law. Chemerinsky then claimed, “The lower courts said that this was permissible, and the Supreme Court stayed that, and the Supreme Court issued an injunction against the California law.” He gets the procedural history wrong. The district court issued an injunction barring the enforcement of the school secrecy policies. The Ninth Circuit stayed that injunction pending appeal, temporarily restoring the status quo. The Supreme Court then lifted the stay, allowing the district court’s injunction to take effect while the appeal proceeds. He concluded by arguing that the Supreme Court is “very hostile to transgender rights.” But to support that narrative, he had to misrepresent the procedural history, suggesting that every lower court had sided with the school districts before the Supreme Court intervened. That simply isn’t true. These secrecy policies are being defeated over and over in court. Everyone makes mistakes, but Chemerinsky didn’t express any uncertainty about the facts. He presented himself as an authority while confidently misstating the record. He’s lost a lot of credibility in my book. Credit to ThisLeadsToThat and WomenAreReal for the video.
0:50

Dean of Berkeley Law School and prominent constitutional law scholar Erwin Chemerinsky mischaracterized the Mirabelli v. Bonta case during a recent talk in San Francisco. He began by stating, “California has a law that prohibits schools from informing parents about their children’s gender identity without the permission of the children.” He was referring to AB 1955, which prohibits school districts from adopting policies that require disclosure. The state itself has repeatedly argued that the law does not prohibit school employees from informing parents; instead it bars districts from requiring them to do so. Importantly, Mirabelli was filed before AB 1955, and the lawsuit does not directly challenge that law. Chemerinsky then claimed, “The lower courts said that this was permissible, and the Supreme Court stayed that, and the Supreme Court issued an injunction against the California law.” He gets the procedural history wrong. The district court issued an injunction barring the enforcement of the school secrecy policies. The Ninth Circuit stayed that injunction pending appeal, temporarily restoring the status quo. The Supreme Court then lifted the stay, allowing the district court’s injunction to take effect while the appeal proceeds. He concluded by arguing that the Supreme Court is “very hostile to transgender rights.” But to support that narrative, he had to misrepresent the procedural history, suggesting that every lower court had sided with the school districts before the Supreme Court intervened. That simply isn’t true. These secrecy policies are being defeated over and over in court. Everyone makes mistakes, but Chemerinsky didn’t express any uncertainty about the facts. He presented himself as an authority while confidently misstating the record. He’s lost a lot of credibility in my book. Credit to ThisLeadsToThat and WomenAreReal for the video.

Laura Powell

19,532 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Seattle Times doesn't think parents should have access to their child's health records from school, or that parents should know if their child is using a different name or pronouns in class. Weird.
12:54

The Seattle Times doesn't think parents should have access to their child's health records from school, or that parents should know if their child is using a different name or pronouns in class. Weird.

Brandi Kruse

15,565 просмотров • 26 дней назад

WOW. Berwick Area School District in PA passed TWO policies PROTECTING girls and enforcing COMMON SENSE. -Students must use bathrooms that reflect their biological sex -Prevents teachers from calling students by "preferred names or pronouns" behind parents’ backs Policies like this need to be passed at EVERY school in the country.
2:23

WOW. Berwick Area School District in PA passed TWO policies PROTECTING girls and enforcing COMMON SENSE. -Students must use bathrooms that reflect their biological sex -Prevents teachers from calling students by "preferred names or pronouns" behind parents’ backs Policies like this need to be passed at EVERY school in the country.

Libs of TikTok

979,971 просмотров • 1 год назад

A Kansas school district is staring down a loss of $70 MILLION in federal funding after secretly socially transitioning kids at school — new names, new pronouns, “gender transition” plans — all without telling the parents! Attorney General Todd Blanche: “There’s not a parent in America — no matter where they live — that would want their school to change and call their child by a different name and not expect to be told about that.” The DOJ just filed a groundbreaking lawsuit because FERPA doesn’t defend the government from parents; it shields parents from the government.
1:15

A Kansas school district is staring down a loss of $70 MILLION in federal funding after secretly socially transitioning kids at school — new names, new pronouns, “gender transition” plans — all without telling the parents! Attorney General Todd Blanche: “There’s not a parent in America — no matter where they live — that would want their school to change and call their child by a different name and not expect to be told about that.” The DOJ just filed a groundbreaking lawsuit because FERPA doesn’t defend the government from parents; it shields parents from the government.

Moms for Liberty

15,416 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court was just asked to STRIKE DOWN a California law that lets school districts KEEP SECRET a child's "gender identity" from the parents That's right, Gavin Newsom is preventing parents from knowing deeply important information about their own kids in schools "A controversial California law prevents public schools from having to notify parents about a transgender student's gender identity." Reverse the law NOW! Unbelievable this is even a conversation.
0:55

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court was just asked to STRIKE DOWN a California law that lets school districts KEEP SECRET a child's "gender identity" from the parents That's right, Gavin Newsom is preventing parents from knowing deeply important information about their own kids in schools "A controversial California law prevents public schools from having to notify parents about a transgender student's gender identity." Reverse the law NOW! Unbelievable this is even a conversation.

Eric Daugherty

62,304 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

No state should be able to assert custody over a child because the parents refuse to refer to the child by their preferred sex or pronouns. Bills like Sage’s Law in Virginia and the Affirming Families Act in Ohio are strong policies that protect children suffering from gender dysphoria from abuse at the hands of gender ideologues in the state.
1:47

No state should be able to assert custody over a child because the parents refuse to refer to the child by their preferred sex or pronouns. Bills like Sage’s Law in Virginia and the Affirming Families Act in Ohio are strong policies that protect children suffering from gender dysphoria from abuse at the hands of gender ideologues in the state.

Heritage Foundation

11,592 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

PARENTS SUE: A New Jersey school district is facing a major lawsuit after refusing to notify parents when their children socially transition their gender identity at school — despite the Supreme Court ruling against exactly this kind of policy. The School District of the Chathams allows students to change their name in official records, use bathrooms and locker rooms matching their gender identity, and leaves it up to a guidance counselor to decide whether parents ever find out. The Thomas More Society and Moms for Liberty filed suit on August 24, accusing the district of violating parents' First Amendment, religious liberty, and 14th Amendment due process rights. The school board president claimed the district isn't legally bound by the Supreme Court's Mirabelli ruling — but New Jersey's own attorney general has acknowledged the state guidance the district is relying on isn't mandatory.
0:37

PARENTS SUE: A New Jersey school district is facing a major lawsuit after refusing to notify parents when their children socially transition their gender identity at school — despite the Supreme Court ruling against exactly this kind of policy. The School District of the Chathams allows students to change their name in official records, use bathrooms and locker rooms matching their gender identity, and leaves it up to a guidance counselor to decide whether parents ever find out. The Thomas More Society and Moms for Liberty filed suit on August 24, accusing the district of violating parents' First Amendment, religious liberty, and 14th Amendment due process rights. The school board president claimed the district isn't legally bound by the Supreme Court's Mirabelli ruling — but New Jersey's own attorney general has acknowledged the state guidance the district is relying on isn't mandatory.

Fox News Politics

18,258 просмотров • 24 дней назад

🚨WATCH: A transgender activist in Virginia tells parents "a child is not your property" and says children should be free to explore their gender identity at school. The activist, referred to as "Dale," came to the Newport News School Board meeting on Tuesday to discuss a new policy that would allow transgender students to use their chosen names and preferred pronouns during school hours if they choose. "To the parents who oppose this policy, if your child does not want to tell you they are transgender, it is because they don't trust you," Dale said. "You have not earned their trust." Dale went on to say that "God made them this way" and told parents it's "not too late" for parents to accept that.
0:50

🚨WATCH: A transgender activist in Virginia tells parents "a child is not your property" and says children should be free to explore their gender identity at school. The activist, referred to as "Dale," came to the Newport News School Board meeting on Tuesday to discuss a new policy that would allow transgender students to use their chosen names and preferred pronouns during school hours if they choose. "To the parents who oppose this policy, if your child does not want to tell you they are transgender, it is because they don't trust you," Dale said. "You have not earned their trust." Dale went on to say that "God made them this way" and told parents it's "not too late" for parents to accept that.

Off The Press

24,735 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: CALIFORNIA CAN NO LONGER SECRETLY TRANSITION KIDS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS You are probably asking yourself, California was doing what? A few years ago, California passed AB 1955. This law told teachers and school administrators they had to keep a child’s social transition (new name, pronouns, gender identity) secret from parents. If they told the parents, they could face penalties. Because of this law, multiple children were secretly transitioned at school. Parents only found out after the transition had already started. In one heartbreaking case, parents only learned their child had been socially transitioned after the student attempted to take their own life. Schools even had specific trainings teaching staff how to hide this information from moms and dads. Thanks to the Mirabelli v. Bonta case, the Supreme Court just stepped in and ruled that schools can no longer hide these major decisions from parents. This is your California government at work, trying to dismantle your fundamental rights as a parent. Parents have the right to know. Period. Find out if your school district is secretly transitioning kids. Share, inform, vote and help us fight for California.
2:30

🚨 BREAKING: CALIFORNIA CAN NO LONGER SECRETLY TRANSITION KIDS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS You are probably asking yourself, California was doing what? A few years ago, California passed AB 1955. This law told teachers and school administrators they had to keep a child’s social transition (new name, pronouns, gender identity) secret from parents. If they told the parents, they could face penalties. Because of this law, multiple children were secretly transitioned at school. Parents only found out after the transition had already started. In one heartbreaking case, parents only learned their child had been socially transitioned after the student attempted to take their own life. Schools even had specific trainings teaching staff how to hide this information from moms and dads. Thanks to the Mirabelli v. Bonta case, the Supreme Court just stepped in and ruled that schools can no longer hide these major decisions from parents. This is your California government at work, trying to dismantle your fundamental rights as a parent. Parents have the right to know. Period. Find out if your school district is secretly transitioning kids. Share, inform, vote and help us fight for California.

David Tangipa

13,722 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Gavin Newsom sued Chino School District when parents stood up for parents' rights. Newsom even passed a law to hide secret gender transitions from families The Ninth Circuit Court just sided with parents. This is a huge win “Gavin Newsom and his allies fought us and even sued us. You guys remember that. Then they went even further and passed a law, AB 1955, forcing schools to hide secret transitions and other very critical information from you moms and dads” The court decided The State does not have the right to hide important information from you, the parents. They do not have the right to secretly transition your kids without your knowledge This is real and here’s what actually happened Chino Valley Unified School District in California passed a policy requiring schools to notify parents if their child requests to change gender identification, pronouns, or use different facilities at school Gavin Newsom and the California Attorney General sued the district, arguing the policy violated students’ privacy rights and state law Gavin Newsom then passed AB 1955 which prohibits schools from notifying parents about a child’s gender identity changes or “social transition” without the child’s consent The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just sided with the parents and the Chino Valley district. The court held that: - Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and education of their children. - The state and schools do not have the authority to systematically hide critical information like social gender transitions from parents - Policies and laws forcing schools to conceal such information from families are likely unconstitutional Democrats literally tried to let schools transition kids into being transgender and legally hide it from parents. This is evil
2:38

Gavin Newsom sued Chino School District when parents stood up for parents' rights. Newsom even passed a law to hide secret gender transitions from families The Ninth Circuit Court just sided with parents. This is a huge win “Gavin Newsom and his allies fought us and even sued us. You guys remember that. Then they went even further and passed a law, AB 1955, forcing schools to hide secret transitions and other very critical information from you moms and dads” The court decided The State does not have the right to hide important information from you, the parents. They do not have the right to secretly transition your kids without your knowledge This is real and here’s what actually happened Chino Valley Unified School District in California passed a policy requiring schools to notify parents if their child requests to change gender identification, pronouns, or use different facilities at school Gavin Newsom and the California Attorney General sued the district, arguing the policy violated students’ privacy rights and state law Gavin Newsom then passed AB 1955 which prohibits schools from notifying parents about a child’s gender identity changes or “social transition” without the child’s consent The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just sided with the parents and the Chino Valley district. The court held that: - Parents have a fundamental right to direct the upbringing and education of their children. - The state and schools do not have the authority to systematically hide critical information like social gender transitions from parents - Policies and laws forcing schools to conceal such information from families are likely unconstitutional Democrats literally tried to let schools transition kids into being transgender and legally hide it from parents. This is evil

Wall Street Apes

36,405 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"They don't believe that these are your kids. They believe that these are the government's kids." Riley Gaines reacts to a California judge banning a school district from imposing a policy that would have required teachers and staff to notify parents if their student declares they want to change their name or pronouns. | FOX & Friends
0:53

"They don't believe that these are your kids. They believe that these are the government's kids." Riley Gaines reacts to a California judge banning a school district from imposing a policy that would have required teachers and staff to notify parents if their student declares they want to change their name or pronouns. | FOX & Friends

Fox News

20,477,580 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Colorado Democrats just quietly, and in secret passed a HB 1312 restricting free speech. Use of preferred pronouns and selected names based on gender identity is now MANDATORY “So they've just enacted a new law and Governor Jared Polis signed it going into the weekend, HB 1312 is actually a modification of, it's an amendment to the pre existing Colorado Anti Discrimination act — What this amendment does is it actually requires any individual in a public accommodation space to use mandatory preferred pronouns and selected names of individuals based on gender identity, even if those individuals disagree with the communication of a message that is antithetical to what they believe. It's the first time I have seen a state enact a law that is so patently unconstitutional that tries to concretize into the state canon a requirement to violate the First Amendment because not every Coloradan is going to agree with the use of preferred pronouns or gender identity related names.”
1:26

Colorado Democrats just quietly, and in secret passed a HB 1312 restricting free speech. Use of preferred pronouns and selected names based on gender identity is now MANDATORY “So they've just enacted a new law and Governor Jared Polis signed it going into the weekend, HB 1312 is actually a modification of, it's an amendment to the pre existing Colorado Anti Discrimination act — What this amendment does is it actually requires any individual in a public accommodation space to use mandatory preferred pronouns and selected names of individuals based on gender identity, even if those individuals disagree with the communication of a message that is antithetical to what they believe. It's the first time I have seen a state enact a law that is so patently unconstitutional that tries to concretize into the state canon a requirement to violate the First Amendment because not every Coloradan is going to agree with the use of preferred pronouns or gender identity related names.”

Wall Street Apes

957,296 просмотров • 1 год назад

Uzbek School Prevents Hijabi Students From Entering School Hijabi Muslim students at School No. 16 in the Syrdarya region of Uzbekistan are reportedly facing unlawful restrictions and discrimination. According to parents, the school’s principle has prohibited girls in Hijabs from entering the school premises. Despite parental intervention, students were still denied access until news spread of the regional governor’s planned visit, at which point they were temporarily allowed to enter. Parents further claim that on a daily basis, girls wearing hijabs are being removed from classes and subjected to baseless comments and discriminatory treatment.
0:42

Uzbek School Prevents Hijabi Students From Entering School Hijabi Muslim students at School No. 16 in the Syrdarya region of Uzbekistan are reportedly facing unlawful restrictions and discrimination. According to parents, the school’s principle has prohibited girls in Hijabs from entering the school premises. Despite parental intervention, students were still denied access until news spread of the regional governor’s planned visit, at which point they were temporarily allowed to enter. Parents further claim that on a daily basis, girls wearing hijabs are being removed from classes and subjected to baseless comments and discriminatory treatment.

DOAM

24,061 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

A school district in Chatham, New Jersey, maintains a policy allowing schools to “socially transition” children without their parents’ consent, in defiance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta. After attorneys demanded that the district rescind the policy, school board president Ann Ciccarelli read a statement asserting that the Supreme Court’s opinion is “NOT binding on public school districts in New Jersey.” While it is technically true that Mirabelli was not a final decision on the merits, the Court’s opinion communicated its clear position that such policies likely violate parents’ constitutional rights. Ciccarelli nevertheless argued that state law and guidance from the department of education require the district to maintain its policy and that changing it could embroil the district in “costly litigation.” I’ve noticed that elected officials suddenly become deeply concerned about the cost of potential litigation when they’re asked to abandon a policy they support, while showing no concern about the potentially far greater costs of defending that same policy in court. Ciccarelli’s professed concern about litigation costs is particularly comical here. The district had already received a formal demand from attorneys insisting that it rescind its unconstitutional policy. And the demand came from the very law firm that took Mirabelli all the way to the Supreme Court and secured an award of $4.8 million, and counting, in attorneys’ fees. Did she think they were bluffing? Now the district is being sued. And it will lose.
1:05

A school district in Chatham, New Jersey, maintains a policy allowing schools to “socially transition” children without their parents’ consent, in defiance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta. After attorneys demanded that the district rescind the policy, school board president Ann Ciccarelli read a statement asserting that the Supreme Court’s opinion is “NOT binding on public school districts in New Jersey.” While it is technically true that Mirabelli was not a final decision on the merits, the Court’s opinion communicated its clear position that such policies likely violate parents’ constitutional rights. Ciccarelli nevertheless argued that state law and guidance from the department of education require the district to maintain its policy and that changing it could embroil the district in “costly litigation.” I’ve noticed that elected officials suddenly become deeply concerned about the cost of potential litigation when they’re asked to abandon a policy they support, while showing no concern about the potentially far greater costs of defending that same policy in court. Ciccarelli’s professed concern about litigation costs is particularly comical here. The district had already received a formal demand from attorneys insisting that it rescind its unconstitutional policy. And the demand came from the very law firm that took Mirabelli all the way to the Supreme Court and secured an award of $4.8 million, and counting, in attorneys’ fees. Did she think they were bluffing? Now the district is being sued. And it will lose.

Laura Powell

28,104 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Why is it that parents have so little control over where their children go to school? Unless you homeschool or send your child to a private school, you’re at the mercy of the government and the Teachers Unions. That needs to change. Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist
0:55

Why is it that parents have so little control over where their children go to school? Unless you homeschool or send your child to a private school, you’re at the mercy of the government and the Teachers Unions. That needs to change. Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist

PragerU

11,567 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.Mary Margaret Olohan: "The Supreme Court is hearing a case dealing with parents who don't want their kids having to read gender ideology books in school. Can you comment on that case?" White House Press Office: "We hope the Supreme Court will do the right thing. And the President has been very clear—he stands on the side of parental rights, and he believes strongly that parents should have a greater say in their children's education and the content that children are being exposed to in our public school system."
0:25

.Mary Margaret Olohan: "The Supreme Court is hearing a case dealing with parents who don't want their kids having to read gender ideology books in school. Can you comment on that case?" White House Press Office: "We hope the Supreme Court will do the right thing. And the President has been very clear—he stands on the side of parental rights, and he believes strongly that parents should have a greater say in their children's education and the content that children are being exposed to in our public school system."

Daily Wire

159,887 просмотров • 1 год назад

Todd Blanche says a Kansas City school district was using different names for students without telling their parents, and that the government had to sue to get answers. His reaction: “The fact we’re talking about a school district keeping from parents something as fundamental as a child’s name… is shocking.” If parents are being deliberately kept in the dark about something this important, we have a serious problem.
3:19

Todd Blanche says a Kansas City school district was using different names for students without telling their parents, and that the government had to sue to get answers. His reaction: “The fact we’re talking about a school district keeping from parents something as fundamental as a child’s name… is shocking.” If parents are being deliberately kept in the dark about something this important, we have a serious problem.

Thomas Sowell Quotes

30,209 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.
2:56

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,437 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

SOUNDING THE ALARM: If a child wants to begin the process of transitioning to a different sex or use gender pronouns, public school teacher Matt Bell says WA families are being left in the dark. "I'm banned from telling parents what's going on, I could lose my job." That's why he's supporting Let's Go WA ballot initiatives that would strengthen parental rights and ban biological boys from girls sports.
2:23

SOUNDING THE ALARM: If a child wants to begin the process of transitioning to a different sex or use gender pronouns, public school teacher Matt Bell says WA families are being left in the dark. "I'm banned from telling parents what's going on, I could lose my job." That's why he's supporting Let's Go WA ballot initiatives that would strengthen parental rights and ban biological boys from girls sports.

Jonathan Choe

64,866 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад