Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

During #DynamicMariner 25, experts from NCIA's Cyber Rapid Response Team deployed to counter a simulated malware threat aboard ship TCG Gaziantep🔒 Within hours, NCIA's cyber experts neutralized the threat, secured communications and reinforced the ship’s network. NATO Maritime Command España en la OTAN 🇪🇦 / Spain at NATO Türkiye...

nato_ncia's profile picture

NCIA

9,948 subscribers

43,219 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & TechnologieBildung#DynamicMariner
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

2 Kommentare

Profilbild von A Wish @A Wish
A Wish @A Wishvor 1 Jahr

@tcsavunma @NATO_MARCOM 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷♥️

Profilbild von SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simplevor 1 Jahr

😱The cybersecurity skills gap is a national security risk. Many public & private orgs struggle to defend against cyberattacks due to understaffed security teams.🚨 🧠Learn cybersecurity - get a well paid, in demand job! Start your journey here:

Ähnliche Videos

⚓ UKs CSG and Spanish Maritime Forces SPMARFOR HQ are participating in #NeptuneStrike 26-3 under the activation of NATO's CTF-Atlantic, strengthening Allied interoperability, readiness, and collective defence at sea. #NATO #CTFAtlantic #ArcticSentry #StrongerTogether #WeAreNATO #NeptuneStrike Armada SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations | NATO Maritime Command | SPMARFOR HQ | Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸| España en la OTAN 🇪🇦 / Spain at NATO | Ministerio Defensa | STRIKFORNATO | NATO Air Command | Iceland at NATO 🇮🇸 | MFA Iceland 🇮🇸 | UK Carrier Strike Group | Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧| NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS | NATO JFC Naples
0:20

⚓ UKs CSG and Spanish Maritime Forces SPMARFOR HQ are participating in #NeptuneStrike 26-3 under the activation of NATO's CTF-Atlantic, strengthening Allied interoperability, readiness, and collective defence at sea. #NATO #CTFAtlantic #ArcticSentry #StrongerTogether #WeAreNATO #NeptuneStrike Armada SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations | NATO Maritime Command | SPMARFOR HQ | Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸| España en la OTAN 🇪🇦 / Spain at NATO | Ministerio Defensa | STRIKFORNATO | NATO Air Command | Iceland at NATO 🇮🇸 | MFA Iceland 🇮🇸 | UK Carrier Strike Group | Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧| NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS | NATO JFC Naples

NATO Maritime Command

16,987 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇪🇸 Spanish and 🇮🇹Italian helicopters 🚁 have landed at Hohn Air Base as Exercise #SteadfastDart26 continues. Their arrival reinforces #NATO’s rapid deployment capability, demonstrating that Allied strength extends beyond land 🪖 and sea 🌊 to the skies ✈️. Ready. Responsive. United. 💪🌍 #WeAreNATO #StrongerTogether NATO SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations NATO Rapid Deployable Corps Italy (ARF-HQ) España en la OTAN 🇪🇦 / Spain at NATO Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸 Ejército de Tierra 🇪🇸 Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸 Esercito Italiano Italy at NATO Armada
0:46

🇪🇸 Spanish and 🇮🇹Italian helicopters 🚁 have landed at Hohn Air Base as Exercise #SteadfastDart26 continues. Their arrival reinforces #NATO’s rapid deployment capability, demonstrating that Allied strength extends beyond land 🪖 and sea 🌊 to the skies ✈️. Ready. Responsive. United. 💪🌍 #WeAreNATO #StrongerTogether NATO SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations NATO Rapid Deployable Corps Italy (ARF-HQ) España en la OTAN 🇪🇦 / Spain at NATO Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸 Ejército de Tierra 🇪🇸 Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸 Esercito Italiano Italy at NATO Armada

NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS

15,264 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🛠️Combat Engineers: the problem-solvers on the battlefield. From clearing obstacles to handling explosives and enabling mobility, they help ensure operations move forward safely and effectively. Meet Carlos from 🇪🇸 Spain’s 6th Combat Engineer Battalion at #SteadfastDart26 and if you’d like to learn more, visit 🔗 #WeAreNATO #StrongerTogether Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸 NATO SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations España en la OTAN 🇪🇦 / Spain at NATO
0:59

🛠️Combat Engineers: the problem-solvers on the battlefield. From clearing obstacles to handling explosives and enabling mobility, they help ensure operations move forward safely and effectively. Meet Carlos from 🇪🇸 Spain’s 6th Combat Engineer Battalion at #SteadfastDart26 and if you’d like to learn more, visit 🔗 #WeAreNATO #StrongerTogether Estado Mayor Defensa 🇪🇸 NATO SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations España en la OTAN 🇪🇦 / Spain at NATO

NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS

104,001 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

📍At Kallax Air Base in northern Sweden 🇸🇪 our reporter steps inside the Deployable Air Command and Control Centre and speaks with a Swedish pilot to explore how NCIA supported secure communications, resilient networks and cyber defence capabilities, enabling Allied forces to operate and defend as one during #RamsteinFlag26. This is collective defence in action in the #HighNorth 🛩️ #WeAreNATO NATO Air Command NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk - JFCNF Flygvapnet
2:23

📍At Kallax Air Base in northern Sweden 🇸🇪 our reporter steps inside the Deployable Air Command and Control Centre and speaks with a Swedish pilot to explore how NCIA supported secure communications, resilient networks and cyber defence capabilities, enabling Allied forces to operate and defend as one during #RamsteinFlag26. This is collective defence in action in the #HighNorth 🛩️ #WeAreNATO NATO Air Command NATO Allied Joint Force Command Norfolk - JFCNF Flygvapnet

NCIA

25,542 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🗓️ 25 Kasım-5 Aralık 2025 📍 İtalya Türk Hava Kuvvetlerinin imkân, kabiliyet ve eğitim seviyesini uluslararası çoklu ortamda göstermek amacıyla 1’inci Ana Jet Üs Komutanlığımıza ait 3 adet F-4E/2020 uçağı ve 51 personel, İtalya’da icra edilen Poggio Dart-2025 (PODA-25) Tatbikatı’na katılıyor. 🗓️ 25 November–5 December 2025 📍 Italy In order to demonstrate the capabilities, proficiency and training level of the Turkish Air Force in an international, multi-national environment, three F-4E/2020 aircraft and 51 personnel from 🇹🇷 1st Main Jet Base Command are participating in the Poggio Dart-2025 (PODA-25) Exercise in Italy. During the exercise, air units from Türkiye, Italy, the United States and NATO (Airborne Early Warning and Control Aircraft) are deployed at Istrana Air Base. NATO SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations NATO_AIRCOM NATO JFC Naples #MillîSavunmaBakanlığı #WeAreNATO #StrongerTogether
0:54

🗓️ 25 Kasım-5 Aralık 2025 📍 İtalya Türk Hava Kuvvetlerinin imkân, kabiliyet ve eğitim seviyesini uluslararası çoklu ortamda göstermek amacıyla 1’inci Ana Jet Üs Komutanlığımıza ait 3 adet F-4E/2020 uçağı ve 51 personel, İtalya’da icra edilen Poggio Dart-2025 (PODA-25) Tatbikatı’na katılıyor. 🗓️ 25 November–5 December 2025 📍 Italy In order to demonstrate the capabilities, proficiency and training level of the Turkish Air Force in an international, multi-national environment, three F-4E/2020 aircraft and 51 personnel from 🇹🇷 1st Main Jet Base Command are participating in the Poggio Dart-2025 (PODA-25) Exercise in Italy. During the exercise, air units from Türkiye, Italy, the United States and NATO (Airborne Early Warning and Control Aircraft) are deployed at Istrana Air Base. NATO SHAPE - NATO Allied Command Operations NATO_AIRCOM NATO JFC Naples #MillîSavunmaBakanlığı #WeAreNATO #StrongerTogether

T.C. Millî Savunma Bakanlığı

48,805 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨🇺🇦⚓️ UKRAINE’S AI-POWERED ANTI-DRONE WEAPON IMPRESSES NATO AFTER SUCCESSFUL FRIGATE TRIALS. Ukrainian defense company UGV Robotics has successfully tested its “Khyzhak” (Predator) remotely operated anti-drone combat module aboard a frigate belonging to a NATO member state’s navy. Armed with a Belgian-made 7.62 mm FN MAG machine gun, the system successfully repelled both aerial and naval drone attacks during the trials, demonstrating its ability to protect warships from the rapidly evolving drone threat. The Khyzhak module uses artificial intelligence to automatically detect, track, and engage targets. It can also be installed on existing warships without requiring structural modifications, making it a fast and cost-effective upgrade for naval fleets. According to UGV Robotics, interest from NATO countries surged after a military exercise in which a Ukrainian Magura naval kamikaze drone successfully carried out a simulated sinking of a frigate, highlighting the urgent need for effective shipborne counter-drone defenses. The successful sea trials reflect how Ukraine’s wartime innovations are increasingly shaping NATO’s future naval doctrine, as allied militaries race to defend their fleets against the growing threat posed by unmanned aerial and surface attack systems.
0:25

🚨🇺🇦⚓️ UKRAINE’S AI-POWERED ANTI-DRONE WEAPON IMPRESSES NATO AFTER SUCCESSFUL FRIGATE TRIALS. Ukrainian defense company UGV Robotics has successfully tested its “Khyzhak” (Predator) remotely operated anti-drone combat module aboard a frigate belonging to a NATO member state’s navy. Armed with a Belgian-made 7.62 mm FN MAG machine gun, the system successfully repelled both aerial and naval drone attacks during the trials, demonstrating its ability to protect warships from the rapidly evolving drone threat. The Khyzhak module uses artificial intelligence to automatically detect, track, and engage targets. It can also be installed on existing warships without requiring structural modifications, making it a fast and cost-effective upgrade for naval fleets. According to UGV Robotics, interest from NATO countries surged after a military exercise in which a Ukrainian Magura naval kamikaze drone successfully carried out a simulated sinking of a frigate, highlighting the urgent need for effective shipborne counter-drone defenses. The successful sea trials reflect how Ukraine’s wartime innovations are increasingly shaping NATO’s future naval doctrine, as allied militaries race to defend their fleets against the growing threat posed by unmanned aerial and surface attack systems.

NSTRIKE

33,672 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It is impossible for all NATO allies to be like Turkiye. Why? This is because there are some countries within the alliance that demand all kinds of assistance without assuming any operational responsibility or join missions, and some has been engaging in hostile actions and lobbying efforts for years with the aim of hindering the progress of other NATO countries. Not only has this country failed to make any financial or military contributions to NATO, but it is also attempting to weaken NATO from within in order to hinder the progress of countries like Turkiye—which carry out NATO missions under the NATO flag from the Baltic states to Eastern Europe. Let’s turn to the other aspect of the issue: the question of being like Turkiye. Just think about it this way; What business does a country that can’t even build a cheap commercial ship have in the same military alliance as one that can produce over 50 warships including destroyers, aircraft carriers and submarines at the same time? Can the perception of power and alliance ever be the same between a country capable of delivering thousands of AG munitions in a single shipment and a country that is delighted even to purchase just 30–40 AG munitions? Can a country with only 150-170 tanks that could be considered "modern" in its inventory be the same as one that is building facilities capable of delivering 100 tanks a year? Can there be a spirit of unity between a country that can develop and fly a 5th-generation fighter jet, and build facilities to produce 24+9 KAAN fighter jets/year and a country that, upon purchasing 20-25 4th-generation aircraft, immediately thinks of provocation, illegal actions and violating treaties for expanding ? As long as NATO fails to purge own parasites within its union, other countries will be forced to walk with a burden on their backs. Without these types of freeloaders—who don’t shoulder any of the alliance’s burdens—NATO could be a much stronger military organization. They're of no use—at least we'd be spared the harm they cause. Imagine flying side by side in battle with the incompetents who crashed a plane into parked fighter jets during a NATO exercise or caused a helicopter to crash into the sea in other exercise while flying at low altitude. May God grant us ease.
3:38

It is impossible for all NATO allies to be like Turkiye. Why? This is because there are some countries within the alliance that demand all kinds of assistance without assuming any operational responsibility or join missions, and some has been engaging in hostile actions and lobbying efforts for years with the aim of hindering the progress of other NATO countries. Not only has this country failed to make any financial or military contributions to NATO, but it is also attempting to weaken NATO from within in order to hinder the progress of countries like Turkiye—which carry out NATO missions under the NATO flag from the Baltic states to Eastern Europe. Let’s turn to the other aspect of the issue: the question of being like Turkiye. Just think about it this way; What business does a country that can’t even build a cheap commercial ship have in the same military alliance as one that can produce over 50 warships including destroyers, aircraft carriers and submarines at the same time? Can the perception of power and alliance ever be the same between a country capable of delivering thousands of AG munitions in a single shipment and a country that is delighted even to purchase just 30–40 AG munitions? Can a country with only 150-170 tanks that could be considered "modern" in its inventory be the same as one that is building facilities capable of delivering 100 tanks a year? Can there be a spirit of unity between a country that can develop and fly a 5th-generation fighter jet, and build facilities to produce 24+9 KAAN fighter jets/year and a country that, upon purchasing 20-25 4th-generation aircraft, immediately thinks of provocation, illegal actions and violating treaties for expanding ? As long as NATO fails to purge own parasites within its union, other countries will be forced to walk with a burden on their backs. Without these types of freeloaders—who don’t shoulder any of the alliance’s burdens—NATO could be a much stronger military organization. They're of no use—at least we'd be spared the harm they cause. Imagine flying side by side in battle with the incompetents who crashed a plane into parked fighter jets during a NATO exercise or caused a helicopter to crash into the sea in other exercise while flying at low altitude. May God grant us ease.

TR_tech

18,247 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨THE UKRAINE -RUSSIAN WAR WAS PROVOKED NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS How did this start? Zbigniew Brzezinski in the United States said, "We can surround Russia. We can weaken Russia. We can make Russia fall into pieces." He literally wrote in 1997, he said, "Oh, there'll be a confederation of three weak states, a European Russia, Siberian Russia, Far East Russia." This, this was a senior advisor to the US. They decided 30 years ago, we're gonna surround Russia in the Black Sea, we're going to weaken Russia, we're going to put our military all around Russia. They broke the nuclear balance and nuclear arms control framework in 2002. This was the worst move of all. United States walked out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. And the Russians said, "Oh. You, you wanna have a first strike? You'll attack us in a decapitation strike and then you'll use your anti-ballistic missile system to prevent deterrents." In 2002, the United States just walked out of the ABM Treaty and the Russians said, "Excuse me? What, what, what the hell are you doing? This is our balance." And it came in the context of NATO enlargement. It came in the context of the United States bombing Belgrade for 78 straight days in 1999 to break Serbia in two, but in Kosovo, that region broken apart from Serbia, to put the largest NATO military base in Southeastern Europe, "Camp Bondsteel", in that base. So, the Russians are saying, "Are you kidding? You bomb Belgrade, you expand NATO even though you promised not to do so, you walk out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the list goes on and on. You attack Iraq on completely phony pretenses, you launch a CIA operation to overthrow Bashar al-Assad, you send NATO to overthrow Gaddafi, late in, 2011, and you say NATO's gonna expand to Ukraine and to Georgia. You blame Russia for this? This was an America drunk with its power, saying we can do anything we want and with a plan, and the plan third-rate or fourth-rate or fifth-rate country or to break it was to turn Russia into a apart. On February 21st, 2014, three foreign ministers of the European Union negotiated with Mr. Yanukovych that he would stay in power and that there would be elections eight months later, and this was also agreed with President Putin. The next morning, a US-backed coup violently overthrew Yanukovych, and it took the United States a nanosecond to say, "We support the new government." Europe, because it's so filled with principles, "No, no, no. Yanukovych is president." No, of course it didn't say that. It said, "Whatever daddy said."So, daddy said that it's, now a new government brought in by a coup, and Europe suddenly couldn't even remember 24 hours that it negotiated an agreement with Yanukovych that he would stay in power. And they said, "No, no. He resigned." Oh, we don't think Russia should stay in Crimea anymore." It's been Russia's naval fleet since 1783. The coup is not a coincidence. The coup is to get Russia out of Sevastopol. That's the point. It was the reason why there was a Crimean War in 1853 when Britain and France said, "Get Russia out of the Black Sea." It was Brzezinski's idea in 1997. When Trump comes in in the first term, US pours in the military aid and builds up a million-person army, the largest in Europe actually. What happened when Russia invaded in February 24th, 2022? Within about a week, Zelenskyy said, "Okay, we can be neutral, we can be neutral." And the Ukrainians sent a note to the Russians, "Neutral. We, we don't need the NATO invasion. You stop fighting, we'll declare neutrality." I know in detail this story because I talked to the negotiators at length, and to the Turkish mediators, because a process started in Istanbul to have Ukraine and Russia sit down with each other. And on April 15th, they initialed a document which was almost complete. What happened? The United States and Britain walked in and told the Ukrainians, "No, you continue fighting." The European mainstream media blocks the most basic facts on all of this. This, war could have ended so many times it avoided entirely. Now Europe is in this unbelievable warmongering period led by the German chancellor, of all people and all countries, absolutely unpleasant, Merz, Macron, Starmer. In 2023, I had a conversation with President Macron. And I said, "Mr. President, this war came from NATO enlargement." He said, "You're absolutely right." I said, "Mr. President, this war could end if NATO would just be clear that it's not going to enlarge Ukraine." "You're absolutely right." Yes, nice conversation. He said exactly the opposite in public, and until today says exactly the opposite. --------------------------------------------------- *In 2001, Putin Wanted Russia to Join NATO. Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. Ukraine is the only NON-NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq Ukrainian troops are helping to support democracies. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶The biggest threat in the world is NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake.
13:19

🚨THE UKRAINE -RUSSIAN WAR WAS PROVOKED NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS How did this start? Zbigniew Brzezinski in the United States said, "We can surround Russia. We can weaken Russia. We can make Russia fall into pieces." He literally wrote in 1997, he said, "Oh, there'll be a confederation of three weak states, a European Russia, Siberian Russia, Far East Russia." This, this was a senior advisor to the US. They decided 30 years ago, we're gonna surround Russia in the Black Sea, we're going to weaken Russia, we're going to put our military all around Russia. They broke the nuclear balance and nuclear arms control framework in 2002. This was the worst move of all. United States walked out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. And the Russians said, "Oh. You, you wanna have a first strike? You'll attack us in a decapitation strike and then you'll use your anti-ballistic missile system to prevent deterrents." In 2002, the United States just walked out of the ABM Treaty and the Russians said, "Excuse me? What, what, what the hell are you doing? This is our balance." And it came in the context of NATO enlargement. It came in the context of the United States bombing Belgrade for 78 straight days in 1999 to break Serbia in two, but in Kosovo, that region broken apart from Serbia, to put the largest NATO military base in Southeastern Europe, "Camp Bondsteel", in that base. So, the Russians are saying, "Are you kidding? You bomb Belgrade, you expand NATO even though you promised not to do so, you walk out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the list goes on and on. You attack Iraq on completely phony pretenses, you launch a CIA operation to overthrow Bashar al-Assad, you send NATO to overthrow Gaddafi, late in, 2011, and you say NATO's gonna expand to Ukraine and to Georgia. You blame Russia for this? This was an America drunk with its power, saying we can do anything we want and with a plan, and the plan third-rate or fourth-rate or fifth-rate country or to break it was to turn Russia into a apart. On February 21st, 2014, three foreign ministers of the European Union negotiated with Mr. Yanukovych that he would stay in power and that there would be elections eight months later, and this was also agreed with President Putin. The next morning, a US-backed coup violently overthrew Yanukovych, and it took the United States a nanosecond to say, "We support the new government." Europe, because it's so filled with principles, "No, no, no. Yanukovych is president." No, of course it didn't say that. It said, "Whatever daddy said."So, daddy said that it's, now a new government brought in by a coup, and Europe suddenly couldn't even remember 24 hours that it negotiated an agreement with Yanukovych that he would stay in power. And they said, "No, no. He resigned." Oh, we don't think Russia should stay in Crimea anymore." It's been Russia's naval fleet since 1783. The coup is not a coincidence. The coup is to get Russia out of Sevastopol. That's the point. It was the reason why there was a Crimean War in 1853 when Britain and France said, "Get Russia out of the Black Sea." It was Brzezinski's idea in 1997. When Trump comes in in the first term, US pours in the military aid and builds up a million-person army, the largest in Europe actually. What happened when Russia invaded in February 24th, 2022? Within about a week, Zelenskyy said, "Okay, we can be neutral, we can be neutral." And the Ukrainians sent a note to the Russians, "Neutral. We, we don't need the NATO invasion. You stop fighting, we'll declare neutrality." I know in detail this story because I talked to the negotiators at length, and to the Turkish mediators, because a process started in Istanbul to have Ukraine and Russia sit down with each other. And on April 15th, they initialed a document which was almost complete. What happened? The United States and Britain walked in and told the Ukrainians, "No, you continue fighting." The European mainstream media blocks the most basic facts on all of this. This, war could have ended so many times it avoided entirely. Now Europe is in this unbelievable warmongering period led by the German chancellor, of all people and all countries, absolutely unpleasant, Merz, Macron, Starmer. In 2023, I had a conversation with President Macron. And I said, "Mr. President, this war came from NATO enlargement." He said, "You're absolutely right." I said, "Mr. President, this war could end if NATO would just be clear that it's not going to enlarge Ukraine." "You're absolutely right." Yes, nice conversation. He said exactly the opposite in public, and until today says exactly the opposite. --------------------------------------------------- *In 2001, Putin Wanted Russia to Join NATO. Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. Ukraine is the only NON-NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq Ukrainian troops are helping to support democracies. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶The biggest threat in the world is NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

138,585 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Greenland Dominated The Headlines While NATO Used The Cover To Prepare For Russia Back in 2025, my thesis was simple. If the Greenland controversy was mostly political theater, the real tell would come later through exercises, command structures, surveillance, logistics and permanent infrastructure. That is increasingly what happened. The ownership rhetoric faded. The military architecture kept growing. Listen To The Commanders On January 16, 2026, Major General Søren Andersen, head of Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command and the officer responsible for Greenland and the Faroe Islands, said “My focus is not toward the U.S., not at all. My focus is on Russia.” He also dismissed the idea of one NATO ally attacking another and warned that Russian military resources tied down around Ukraine could eventually shift toward the Arctic. That matters because Andersen is not commenting from the political sidelines. He commands the theater. NATO commanders have increasingly described the Arctic in the same terms, focusing on Russian submarines, North Atlantic access, surveillance and reinforcement routes. While the public argument centered on Trump and Greenland ownership, the people actually responsible for the region were talking about Russia. Follow The Money Denmark committed DKK 14.6 billion to Arctic and North Atlantic defense in January 2025 and another DKK 27.4 billion in October. The investments include Arctic vessels, maritime patrol capability, long range drones, satellite surveillance, radar, a new Joint Arctic Command headquarters in Nuuk and secure North Atlantic communications infrastructure. That is what modern fortification looks like. Not necessarily thousands of troops permanently stationed there. It is sensors, communications, surveillance, command infrastructure, logistics and the ability to rapidly receive and sustain allied forces. And the exercises continued. This month more than 400 personnel from 11 NATO countries trained across Greenland during Arctic Shield under the broader Arctic Sentry framework. The rhetoric faded. The infrastructure did not. The military integration did not. Why Greenland Matters Now On September 10, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte described the larger strategic problem. If China moved against Taiwan or elsewhere in the first island chain while Russia simultaneously increased pressure on Europe, he said NATO could face a “serious problem in both theatres.” That is where Greenland becomes strategically important. If the United States is heavily committed in the Pacific, European NATO members need more ability to secure the Arctic and North Atlantic themselves. Greenland provides surveillance, logistics and access around the northern approaches connecting Russia’s Arctic forces with the Atlantic. Was The Original Crisis Cover That remains unproven. But the political spectacle consumed enormous public attention while the less glamorous story involved ships, radar, communications, headquarters, surveillance and multinational training. If it functioned as cover, the audience was primarily Western public opinion and political attention. Russia can see military procurement and exercises. None of this requires believing Trump personally designed some elaborate master plan. Arctic strategy is executed through a much larger institutional system involving the Pentagon, NORTHCOM, NORAD, EUCOM, NATO commands, Denmark’s Defence Command, Joint Arctic Command, intelligence agencies and allied defense ministries. That is why Greenland deserves attention again. People remember the spectacle. They largely stopped watching what was built afterward. And what was built afterward increasingly looks like preparation for a world where NATO must think about Russia in Europe while the United States may simultaneously be heavily occupied by China in the Pacific.
1:05

Greenland Dominated The Headlines While NATO Used The Cover To Prepare For Russia Back in 2025, my thesis was simple. If the Greenland controversy was mostly political theater, the real tell would come later through exercises, command structures, surveillance, logistics and permanent infrastructure. That is increasingly what happened. The ownership rhetoric faded. The military architecture kept growing. Listen To The Commanders On January 16, 2026, Major General Søren Andersen, head of Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command and the officer responsible for Greenland and the Faroe Islands, said “My focus is not toward the U.S., not at all. My focus is on Russia.” He also dismissed the idea of one NATO ally attacking another and warned that Russian military resources tied down around Ukraine could eventually shift toward the Arctic. That matters because Andersen is not commenting from the political sidelines. He commands the theater. NATO commanders have increasingly described the Arctic in the same terms, focusing on Russian submarines, North Atlantic access, surveillance and reinforcement routes. While the public argument centered on Trump and Greenland ownership, the people actually responsible for the region were talking about Russia. Follow The Money Denmark committed DKK 14.6 billion to Arctic and North Atlantic defense in January 2025 and another DKK 27.4 billion in October. The investments include Arctic vessels, maritime patrol capability, long range drones, satellite surveillance, radar, a new Joint Arctic Command headquarters in Nuuk and secure North Atlantic communications infrastructure. That is what modern fortification looks like. Not necessarily thousands of troops permanently stationed there. It is sensors, communications, surveillance, command infrastructure, logistics and the ability to rapidly receive and sustain allied forces. And the exercises continued. This month more than 400 personnel from 11 NATO countries trained across Greenland during Arctic Shield under the broader Arctic Sentry framework. The rhetoric faded. The infrastructure did not. The military integration did not. Why Greenland Matters Now On September 10, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte described the larger strategic problem. If China moved against Taiwan or elsewhere in the first island chain while Russia simultaneously increased pressure on Europe, he said NATO could face a “serious problem in both theatres.” That is where Greenland becomes strategically important. If the United States is heavily committed in the Pacific, European NATO members need more ability to secure the Arctic and North Atlantic themselves. Greenland provides surveillance, logistics and access around the northern approaches connecting Russia’s Arctic forces with the Atlantic. Was The Original Crisis Cover That remains unproven. But the political spectacle consumed enormous public attention while the less glamorous story involved ships, radar, communications, headquarters, surveillance and multinational training. If it functioned as cover, the audience was primarily Western public opinion and political attention. Russia can see military procurement and exercises. None of this requires believing Trump personally designed some elaborate master plan. Arctic strategy is executed through a much larger institutional system involving the Pentagon, NORTHCOM, NORAD, EUCOM, NATO commands, Denmark’s Defence Command, Joint Arctic Command, intelligence agencies and allied defense ministries. That is why Greenland deserves attention again. People remember the spectacle. They largely stopped watching what was built afterward. And what was built afterward increasingly looks like preparation for a world where NATO must think about Russia in Europe while the United States may simultaneously be heavily occupied by China in the Pacific.

EndGame Macro

42,933 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA COMPLETES SEA TRIALS OF WORLD’S LARGEST AND MOST HEAVILY ARMED CRUISER Russia’s rebuilt Admiral Nakhimov nuclear-powered battlecruiser is finishing factory and sea trials before moving to state testing. Sevmash plans to hand the ship to the Russian Navy by the end of 2026. After nearly three decades away from operational service, the giant warship is returning as a mobile missile arsenal built for prolonged deployments in the Arctic and North Atlantic. 🔸 Scale: At 251 metres and roughly 28,000 tons fully loaded, Admiral Nakhimov is one of the world’s largest non-carrier surface warships. 🔸 Endurance: Two KN-3 nuclear reactors feed steam turbines generating about 140,000 shaft horsepower. Nuclear propulsion provides exceptional cruising range, while the ship’s reported top speed is approximately 32 knots. 🔸 Strike power: The cruiser is expected to carry 80 universal vertical-launch cells able to fire Kalibr cruise missiles, Oniks anti-ship missiles and Zircon hypersonic missiles. The same ship can therefore strike surface vessels and land targets at long range. 🔸 Air defense: Reports indicate a 96-cell long-range air-defense battery backed by Pantsir-M close-in systems. Combined with the strike launchers, this gives the cruiser a reported core arsenal of 176 large missile cells. 🔸 Reconstruction: This was not a routine refit. Virtually every major combat system, sensor, electronic suite and cable network was replaced, while much of the internal machinery was renewed. 🔸 Strategic role: Admiral Nakhimov can serve as the protected command and strike centre of a naval formation. Its endurance, layered defenses and hypersonic weapons would force NATO fleets to track a heavily armed mobile missile base across Russia’s northern maritime approaches. The project took far longer and cost far more than planned, but Russia is now close to recovering a concentration of surface firepower that no Western navy currently fields on a single non-carrier warship. Does NATO have an effective answer to a Zircon-armed nuclear cruiser?
1:15

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA COMPLETES SEA TRIALS OF WORLD’S LARGEST AND MOST HEAVILY ARMED CRUISER Russia’s rebuilt Admiral Nakhimov nuclear-powered battlecruiser is finishing factory and sea trials before moving to state testing. Sevmash plans to hand the ship to the Russian Navy by the end of 2026. After nearly three decades away from operational service, the giant warship is returning as a mobile missile arsenal built for prolonged deployments in the Arctic and North Atlantic. 🔸 Scale: At 251 metres and roughly 28,000 tons fully loaded, Admiral Nakhimov is one of the world’s largest non-carrier surface warships. 🔸 Endurance: Two KN-3 nuclear reactors feed steam turbines generating about 140,000 shaft horsepower. Nuclear propulsion provides exceptional cruising range, while the ship’s reported top speed is approximately 32 knots. 🔸 Strike power: The cruiser is expected to carry 80 universal vertical-launch cells able to fire Kalibr cruise missiles, Oniks anti-ship missiles and Zircon hypersonic missiles. The same ship can therefore strike surface vessels and land targets at long range. 🔸 Air defense: Reports indicate a 96-cell long-range air-defense battery backed by Pantsir-M close-in systems. Combined with the strike launchers, this gives the cruiser a reported core arsenal of 176 large missile cells. 🔸 Reconstruction: This was not a routine refit. Virtually every major combat system, sensor, electronic suite and cable network was replaced, while much of the internal machinery was renewed. 🔸 Strategic role: Admiral Nakhimov can serve as the protected command and strike centre of a naval formation. Its endurance, layered defenses and hypersonic weapons would force NATO fleets to track a heavily armed mobile missile base across Russia’s northern maritime approaches. The project took far longer and cost far more than planned, but Russia is now close to recovering a concentration of surface firepower that no Western navy currently fields on a single non-carrier warship. Does NATO have an effective answer to a Zircon-armed nuclear cruiser?

NewRulesGeopolitics

73,139 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🍾 Hornetsecurity launches a major first at the InCyber 2025 Forum! This year, our partner Hornetsecurity is stepping up a gear by organising two unforgettable INCYBER NIGHTS at the Lille Grand Palais Zénith, with free beer and entertainment by DJ Abuze. 🎶 They'll also be offering an e-karting track in their space at the Zénith, and giving you the chance to compete for some incredible prizes. A first-of-its-kind event at InCyber not to be missed! To find out more about these incredible upcoming experiences.👉 But that's not all! Don't miss their not-to-be-missed conferences with, among others: 🗓 Romain Basset - ‘East-West Tensions: The Paris-Beijing 2025 Cyber Threat Race’, and ‘From Darkgate to PhaaS: A Deep Dive into Recent TTP Attacks Targeting France’, and ‘From Vade to Hornet: A Strategic Evolution For Your Email Security!’ 🗓 Stéphane Cozette - ‘Mat en trois coups: How the Hornetsecurity platform neutralises cybercriminals’ 🗓 Adrien GENDRE - ‘DMARC demystified: Protect your brand against identity theft’, and “DMARC for the experts: Optimising deliverability and forensic analysis of attacks”. Visit the Hornet space to meet their many co-exhibitors: AVA6, Blue, Prodware , Orange , Scalair , Aquastar Consulting, Cris, MIEL, Arrow, and Sécurité informatique. Join them from 1 to 3 April 2025 at the InCyber Forum!
0:30

🍾 Hornetsecurity launches a major first at the InCyber 2025 Forum! This year, our partner Hornetsecurity is stepping up a gear by organising two unforgettable INCYBER NIGHTS at the Lille Grand Palais Zénith, with free beer and entertainment by DJ Abuze. 🎶 They'll also be offering an e-karting track in their space at the Zénith, and giving you the chance to compete for some incredible prizes. A first-of-its-kind event at InCyber not to be missed! To find out more about these incredible upcoming experiences.👉 But that's not all! Don't miss their not-to-be-missed conferences with, among others: 🗓 Romain Basset - ‘East-West Tensions: The Paris-Beijing 2025 Cyber Threat Race’, and ‘From Darkgate to PhaaS: A Deep Dive into Recent TTP Attacks Targeting France’, and ‘From Vade to Hornet: A Strategic Evolution For Your Email Security!’ 🗓 Stéphane Cozette - ‘Mat en trois coups: How the Hornetsecurity platform neutralises cybercriminals’ 🗓 Adrien GENDRE - ‘DMARC demystified: Protect your brand against identity theft’, and “DMARC for the experts: Optimising deliverability and forensic analysis of attacks”. Visit the Hornet space to meet their many co-exhibitors: AVA6, Blue, Prodware , Orange , Scalair , Aquastar Consulting, Cris, MIEL, Arrow, and Sécurité informatique. Join them from 1 to 3 April 2025 at the InCyber Forum!

Forum INCYBER - EUROPE (FIC)

61,968 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why is the US keen on hyping up the "China threat"? Why is the US keen on hyping up the "China threat"? How has China effectively resolved numerous social issues when the US is mired in systemic crises? What direction will China-US relations go in the future? Haz Al-Din Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺, chairman of the American Communist Party, recently visited China. We spoke with him at Renmin University of China about his idea of "MAGA Communism", American society, and how Americans view China and China–US relations. Key quotes from the interview: ·"If you can question NATO, if you can question the experts, if you can question the institutions and the hegemony, why not question the narratives we're told about history or the present? Why not question the ideological indoctrination? " ·"If you want to know the truth about American foreign policy, look at how they lie about China, because it's projection." ·"Americans will sympathize with China more, the more they resent and dislike their own government." ·"There's no way there's going to be a new world order unless there is an ability to muster the courage and resolve to stand up to US imperialism." Watch the full interview here and join our discussion. #MediaUnlocked
21:44

Why is the US keen on hyping up the "China threat"? Why is the US keen on hyping up the "China threat"? How has China effectively resolved numerous social issues when the US is mired in systemic crises? What direction will China-US relations go in the future? Haz Al-Din Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺, chairman of the American Communist Party, recently visited China. We spoke with him at Renmin University of China about his idea of "MAGA Communism", American society, and how Americans view China and China–US relations. Key quotes from the interview: ·"If you can question NATO, if you can question the experts, if you can question the institutions and the hegemony, why not question the narratives we're told about history or the present? Why not question the ideological indoctrination? " ·"If you want to know the truth about American foreign policy, look at how they lie about China, because it's projection." ·"Americans will sympathize with China more, the more they resent and dislike their own government." ·"There's no way there's going to be a new world order unless there is an ability to muster the courage and resolve to stand up to US imperialism." Watch the full interview here and join our discussion. #MediaUnlocked

MediaUnlocked

35,230 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🇷🇺🇨🇳 WHY RUSSIA AND CHINA AREN'T SCARED OF THE WEST ANYMORE The rules of the game have changed, and not in our favor. During the Cold War, everyone understood deterrence. Both sides knew exactly what signals they were sending when they made moves. It was terrifying, but at least it was predictable. Push too far, get pushed back. Nobody wanted nuclear war, so everyone played carefully. Today? Nobody agrees on the rules. Russia shoots drones into NATO airspace and dares anyone to do something about it. China bullies American allies in the Pacific. They're testing Western resolve, and honestly, they're finding it pretty weak. The West isn't unified anymore. Trump questions why America should police the world. European countries can't agree on how to respond to cyber attacks, sabotage, and provocations because Russia operates in ways that are ambiguous and deniable. Hard to retaliate when you can't definitively prove who did it. And when you can prove it, what then? NATO members can't exactly burn down Moscow shopping centers in response to cut undersea cables. So Russia keeps probing, testing, undermining. The uncomfortable lesson from the Cold War? Sometimes you have to escalate to de-escalate. Threatening enemies more forcefully isn't a sign things are going wrong. It might be the only way to make them back down. The West is relearning this the hard way. Source: The Economist
2:54

🇷🇺🇨🇳 WHY RUSSIA AND CHINA AREN'T SCARED OF THE WEST ANYMORE The rules of the game have changed, and not in our favor. During the Cold War, everyone understood deterrence. Both sides knew exactly what signals they were sending when they made moves. It was terrifying, but at least it was predictable. Push too far, get pushed back. Nobody wanted nuclear war, so everyone played carefully. Today? Nobody agrees on the rules. Russia shoots drones into NATO airspace and dares anyone to do something about it. China bullies American allies in the Pacific. They're testing Western resolve, and honestly, they're finding it pretty weak. The West isn't unified anymore. Trump questions why America should police the world. European countries can't agree on how to respond to cyber attacks, sabotage, and provocations because Russia operates in ways that are ambiguous and deniable. Hard to retaliate when you can't definitively prove who did it. And when you can prove it, what then? NATO members can't exactly burn down Moscow shopping centers in response to cut undersea cables. So Russia keeps probing, testing, undermining. The uncomfortable lesson from the Cold War? Sometimes you have to escalate to de-escalate. Threatening enemies more forcefully isn't a sign things are going wrong. It might be the only way to make them back down. The West is relearning this the hard way. Source: The Economist

Mario Nawfal

193,582 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🇺🇸 WHY DID TRUMP SECRETLY ABANDON AIR FORCE ONE IN TURKEY? A remarkable security operation reportedly unfolded during President Donald Trump’s departure from Türkiye after the NATO summit. Trump was initially expected to return aboard Air Force One, but the Secret Service and U.S. military suddenly moved him to a different aircraft while Air Force One continued with staff, officials and journalists aboard. Trump has now confirmed that he followed instructions from the Secret Service because they believed there was a “greater risk” to the original aircraft. The reported concern was even more serious. According to reports, U.S. intelligence had received information suggesting a possible Iranian threat against Trump involving shoulder fired missiles. The exact intelligence remains classified, and the U.S. government has not publicly confirmed every detail of the alleged plot. From a security perspective, the aircraft itself may not have been the only concern. Air Force One is heavily protected, but its predictable identity, location and movements can make it an obvious target. Switching Trump to a less conspicuous aircraft while leaving the original aircraft operating as a decoy could complicate any attempt to identify the president's actual location. The most striking part is that the operation reportedly involved moving Trump covertly from the airport using a catering vehicle before transferring him to another military aircraft. Even senior officials and journalists aboard the original aircraft were reportedly unaware that Trump was no longer on board. This does not mean an attack was definitely about to happen. But when the Secret Service and military decide that the president's planned aircraft presents a higher than acceptable risk, even a highly protected presidential flight can be changed at the last moment. The bigger question is now: What exactly did U.S. intelligence detect in Türkiye that made the Secret Service consider Air Force One a greater risk?
1:10

🇺🇸 WHY DID TRUMP SECRETLY ABANDON AIR FORCE ONE IN TURKEY? A remarkable security operation reportedly unfolded during President Donald Trump’s departure from Türkiye after the NATO summit. Trump was initially expected to return aboard Air Force One, but the Secret Service and U.S. military suddenly moved him to a different aircraft while Air Force One continued with staff, officials and journalists aboard. Trump has now confirmed that he followed instructions from the Secret Service because they believed there was a “greater risk” to the original aircraft. The reported concern was even more serious. According to reports, U.S. intelligence had received information suggesting a possible Iranian threat against Trump involving shoulder fired missiles. The exact intelligence remains classified, and the U.S. government has not publicly confirmed every detail of the alleged plot. From a security perspective, the aircraft itself may not have been the only concern. Air Force One is heavily protected, but its predictable identity, location and movements can make it an obvious target. Switching Trump to a less conspicuous aircraft while leaving the original aircraft operating as a decoy could complicate any attempt to identify the president's actual location. The most striking part is that the operation reportedly involved moving Trump covertly from the airport using a catering vehicle before transferring him to another military aircraft. Even senior officials and journalists aboard the original aircraft were reportedly unaware that Trump was no longer on board. This does not mean an attack was definitely about to happen. But when the Secret Service and military decide that the president's planned aircraft presents a higher than acceptable risk, even a highly protected presidential flight can be changed at the last moment. The bigger question is now: What exactly did U.S. intelligence detect in Türkiye that made the Secret Service consider Air Force One a greater risk?

Defense Intelligence

10,679 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In 2017, a team of archaeologists excavating the megalithic tomb (3000 BC) of Montelirio tholos (Spain) uncovered an extraordinary dagger formed from rock crystal. Experts say it's most technically sophisticated ever to be uncovered in Prehistoric Iberia and would have taken enormous skill to carve. This 5000 year-old artifact is nearly 8.5 inches long and was found along with 10 arrowheads, four blades and a core for making weapons, all of which were rock crystal. The weapon might have once belonged to an elite individual and may have had a symbolic significance. An excavation of megalithic tombs in Valencina de la Concepción in Spain led to dramatic discovery of rare relics, which experts described as exceptional and magnificently well-preserved. Montelirio Tholos, excavated between 2007-2010, is a great megalithic construction which extends nearly 44m in total, constructed out of large slabs of slate. At least 25 individuals were found within the structure. Analyses suggested that there was one male and numerous females who had drunk a poisonous substance. Remains of women sit in a circle in a chamber adjacent to bones believed to be of their chief. Other findings are 25 arrowheads and cores used for creating the artifacts, all made of crystal. #archaeohistories
0:22

In 2017, a team of archaeologists excavating the megalithic tomb (3000 BC) of Montelirio tholos (Spain) uncovered an extraordinary dagger formed from rock crystal. Experts say it's most technically sophisticated ever to be uncovered in Prehistoric Iberia and would have taken enormous skill to carve. This 5000 year-old artifact is nearly 8.5 inches long and was found along with 10 arrowheads, four blades and a core for making weapons, all of which were rock crystal. The weapon might have once belonged to an elite individual and may have had a symbolic significance. An excavation of megalithic tombs in Valencina de la Concepción in Spain led to dramatic discovery of rare relics, which experts described as exceptional and magnificently well-preserved. Montelirio Tholos, excavated between 2007-2010, is a great megalithic construction which extends nearly 44m in total, constructed out of large slabs of slate. At least 25 individuals were found within the structure. Analyses suggested that there was one male and numerous females who had drunk a poisonous substance. Remains of women sit in a circle in a chamber adjacent to bones believed to be of their chief. Other findings are 25 arrowheads and cores used for creating the artifacts, all made of crystal. #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

22,890 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

#WATCH | Indian Coast Guard (ICG) successfully averted a major incident at sea, rescuing a distressed foreign chemical tanker, MT Seagull 9, approximately 37 nautical miles East-South-East of Paradip, Odisha. ​The Belize-flagged vessel, carrying 9,000 Metric Tonnes of palm oil with 23 crew members onboard, issued an urgent distress call at about 0730 hrs on 27 Sep 2026 following main engine failure and rapid ballast tank flooding, which caused the ship to tilt dangerously. ​Responding swiftly, ICGS Vishwast was immediately dispatched to the scene. Demonstrating high operational readiness, a specialist ICG Damage Control Team boarded the unstable vessel under challenging conditions. Deploying submersible de-flooding pumps and advanced damage-control equipment, the team swiftly arrested the leakage, blanked two damaged seawater pipelines, and contained a third fractured line. ​To reinforce the operations, the Indian Coast Guard has also diverted a Pollution Control Vessel (PCV) and an additional Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV) to the location for augmented pollution response and continuous, round-the-clock monitoring of the situation. ​Through seamless coordination between ICGS Vishwast's specialized team and the vessel's crew, concurrent cargo transfer and de-flooding operations were executed, effectively stabilizing the tanker and eliminating the threat of capsizing. ​Simultaneously, ICG Dornier aircraft launched from Bhubaneswar for real-time aerial surveillance. A minor palm-oil sheen initially observed near the vessel on 27 Sep was confirmed fully dissipated during follow-up aerial sorties on 28 Sep. Strict pollution-response protocols remain active to safeguard the marine ecosystem. ​In a synchronized multi-agency effort, Paradip Port Authority tug Dolphin took the stabilized MT Seagull 9 under tow towards the anchorage area off Paradip. Main engine repairs are currently underway with assistance from ICGS Vishwast’s technical team. ​ICGS Vishwast, alongside the deployed specialized assets, remains on scene maintaining an active sentinel watch and providing continuous operational support. (Video: Indian Coast Guard)
0:36

#WATCH | Indian Coast Guard (ICG) successfully averted a major incident at sea, rescuing a distressed foreign chemical tanker, MT Seagull 9, approximately 37 nautical miles East-South-East of Paradip, Odisha. ​The Belize-flagged vessel, carrying 9,000 Metric Tonnes of palm oil with 23 crew members onboard, issued an urgent distress call at about 0730 hrs on 27 Sep 2026 following main engine failure and rapid ballast tank flooding, which caused the ship to tilt dangerously. ​Responding swiftly, ICGS Vishwast was immediately dispatched to the scene. Demonstrating high operational readiness, a specialist ICG Damage Control Team boarded the unstable vessel under challenging conditions. Deploying submersible de-flooding pumps and advanced damage-control equipment, the team swiftly arrested the leakage, blanked two damaged seawater pipelines, and contained a third fractured line. ​To reinforce the operations, the Indian Coast Guard has also diverted a Pollution Control Vessel (PCV) and an additional Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV) to the location for augmented pollution response and continuous, round-the-clock monitoring of the situation. ​Through seamless coordination between ICGS Vishwast's specialized team and the vessel's crew, concurrent cargo transfer and de-flooding operations were executed, effectively stabilizing the tanker and eliminating the threat of capsizing. ​Simultaneously, ICG Dornier aircraft launched from Bhubaneswar for real-time aerial surveillance. A minor palm-oil sheen initially observed near the vessel on 27 Sep was confirmed fully dissipated during follow-up aerial sorties on 28 Sep. Strict pollution-response protocols remain active to safeguard the marine ecosystem. ​In a synchronized multi-agency effort, Paradip Port Authority tug Dolphin took the stabilized MT Seagull 9 under tow towards the anchorage area off Paradip. Main engine repairs are currently underway with assistance from ICGS Vishwast’s technical team. ​ICGS Vishwast, alongside the deployed specialized assets, remains on scene maintaining an active sentinel watch and providing continuous operational support. (Video: Indian Coast Guard)

ANI

102,672 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen