Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

During his interview with MSNOW's Symone Sanders-Townsend and Eugene Daniels, Hasan Piker talks about Hamas, the Palestinian resistance as a whole and the issue with the concept of a 'perfect victim.' He compares it with other liberation movements throughout history: "And that is the issue at the heart of...

6,044,272 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 21

Фото профиля jancarlo
jancarlo8 дней назад

yo he fucking cooked with that endorsing violence parallel

Фото профиля adri ♡
adri ♡8 дней назад

HE DID SO FUCKING WELLLLL 😭 Symone was on his assssss

Фото профиля jancarlo
jancarlo8 дней назад

annoying as helll!!!! like come on man it's been three fuckin years of this shit‼️‼️‼️ 🫩🫩🫩🫩

Фото профиля adri ♡
adri ♡8 дней назад

IT'S GONNA BE A BUSY MORNING FOR MEEEEEEE BEAR WITH ME YALL 😭 the clips will be comingggggg

Фото профиля michelle fights fascism
michelle fights fascism8 дней назад

You can tell by the look on their faces that he's educational universe above their understanding lol he cooked! More of us agree with him than not.

Фото профиля Mohamed Abdi🇵🇸 🌶🔻🍉
Mohamed Abdi🇵🇸 🌶🔻🍉8 дней назад

He was too smart for them.

Фото профиля QuesoHead🧀
QuesoHead🧀8 дней назад

When he made her say “wait so you’re saying people who protest police brutality are hamas? I can’t get behind that” That is when the light bulb was flickering for her and I think will be illuminating for other listeners

Фото профиля Kefiyyeh Brigade 🌹
Kefiyyeh Brigade 🌹8 дней назад

Oh shit he cooooooked Perfect clip to distribute to all your lib family and friends and the "white moderates". Thank you!

Фото профиля Kia Neaux
Kia Neaux8 дней назад

Piker drawing valid parallels between two types of state “silent” violence - Israeli on Palestinians & US police against Americans Symone Sanders objection is reminding me of conservative commentators in 2020

Фото профиля Mo شومون
Mo شومون8 дней назад

Really shut that lady up there. They really have NOTHING. Kudos to them for having the guts to interview him though. The bar is low but it is what it is.

Фото профиля Kat
Kat8 дней назад

Hasan is so articulate here.

Фото профиля Eki-Tiki-Taka
Eki-Tiki-Taka8 дней назад

Lmfao.... they have NO IDEA what they walked into. You honestly see Eugene's head spinning in the end.

Фото профиля Jonathan (Leo)
Jonathan (Leo)8 дней назад

Bro he cookin

Фото профиля bennny
bennny8 дней назад

“But that’s not my question” and he’s literally answering her question lol

Фото профиля Count The VOTE😷MaskUp
Count The VOTE😷MaskUp8 дней назад

He should use the Irish fighting English occupation as an example because they’re white. People are so colonised that they can’t grok resistance unless it’s perfectly peaceful.

Фото профиля Reggie The Don 👑
Reggie The Don 👑8 дней назад

Oppressed people ARE ALLOWED to meet violence w/ violence. The idea that you have to be a passive victim & let a violent oppressor kill you in order to get sympathy & support from the west is what I don’t like. Armed Resistance by Blk & Brown ppl is LEGAL under international law

Фото профиля frozen white tuna
frozen white tuna8 дней назад

she's such a disgusting careerist bitch

Фото профиля 8-Bitpolar Bear
8-Bitpolar Bear8 дней назад

Cutting through! 👏

Фото профиля Capitalista de Sueldo Minimo
Capitalista de Sueldo Minimo8 дней назад

What's with the guy on the right? Is he practicing his Zoolander looks or something?

Фото профиля NoPasaNada
NoPasaNada8 дней назад

“Don’t tread on me” is also violence. Or what?

Фото профиля CITIZINS
CITIZINS8 дней назад

The hosts are some bitch ass black folks

Похожие видео

.Scott Jennings on the left saying the administration is trying to stop “people” from voting... “What people? You say they don’t want people to vote? What?” “What evidence do you possibly have for that?” “The President does better in higher turnout environments. You know that, right?” “So, A, Trump and his coalition do better in higher turnout environments.” “The point is, if turnout were higher, his party would do better. [Georgetown constitutional law professor Michele Goodwin] is arguing erroneously, without any evidence, in a reckless fashion on this network that, somehow, the President of the United States is trying to stop people from voting. There is no evidence of that whatsoever.” “The only people they care about are people who shouldn’t be on the voter rolls, like illegal aliens, or people who aren’t eligible to vote, and the problem with the mail-in ballots, which are inherently less secure than voting in person, is that in a lot of states, they don't clean up their voting rolls, and they send out millions of mail-in ballots to people, whether they ask for them or not, and many addresses get multiple ballots, and there’s a lot of live ballots out on the street. These states refuse to clean up their voter rolls. That's absolutely true, and you have to ask yourself, why would you want fraudulent registrations on your voter rolls? Why would you fight that?” “He wants people who are legally eligible American citizens to vote and not have their votes diluted by people who are ineligible or illegal.”

Curtis Houck

106,399 просмотров • 29 дней назад

🚨PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI JUST DROPPED THE TRUTH BOMB! "One of the reasons the regime wants a TOTAL INTERNET BLACKOUT is that people like yourselves won't hear what the people in Iran actually have to SAY about this." "The narrative is CONTROLLED completely by the REGIME, and that's what he's trying to push, whether it’s the mainstream media in the outside world to let you believe that people are in fact REJECTING that INTERVENTION." It's actually quite the OPPOSITE. The majority of the Iranian people look at this as LIBERATION CAMPAIGN. "imagine the circumstances during the second world war, imagine you were a French person who was living under the occupation of the Nazi regime, and when the the allies disembarked in on the British of Normandy, that was a campaign for liberation of a country that would otherwise have to face Hitler and his regime." "in this case we are dealing with the regime that has from the very beginning taken our compatriots at their first HOSTAGES and have kept them behind bars, this intervention is LIBERATION for US, so it's a welcome act that will help us finally get RID of this regime, which is the final ask of the Iranian people." "They have had it with this regime, they no longer want it, this regime is totally ILLEGITIMATE, it's just trying to use COERCION and FEAR to maintain itself in POWER. And try to buy TIME and ride the storm so there's no longer a Bibi Netanyahu in Jerusalem or Donald Trump in the white house that could really put pressure on this regime. That's why tactically they are trying to buy time and that has always been their modus operandi in all these years." #RezaPahlavi‌ForIran Reza Pahlavi

Neo

105,119 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“What Do You Mean by Jewish State?” Abdul El-Sayed Pushes Back Katie Halper: So, speaking of AIPAC and people who are very supportive of Israel, there was an interesting interaction between you and Olivia Reingold of The Free Press. Olivia Reingold: Abdul El-Sayed, who is Muslim, walks a fine line on the Jewish state. He told the crowd, “All of us love and revere Jewish folk, our Jewish neighbors, the faith of Judaism.” Later that night, I asked him whether he believes in Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I'd love to take the question, actually. What do you mean by Jewish state? If you can't define the question, I'm not going to answer your question. Katie Halper: So, it's fascinating to me that “What does a Jewish state mean?” can be a gotcha question. Do you think most people would have a different opinion if they understood what the current Jewish state of Israel means? Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I think most people have in their heart of hearts a commitment to foundational equity—that everybody deserves equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination. The reason I asked that question is because it's very difficult to square that question with equal rights for Palestinian people. Whether you're defining a Jewish state based on an actual state religion, which means that some people don't belong as much because they may not belong to the same faith. And then if you're doing it by identity, the question becomes, well, is it the identity of the leadership or is it the majority of the country? All of these become really, really difficult to square with any semblance of equal rights. If your interpretation of the identity of a state would then allow that state to discriminate against people for how they pray or because of their ethnicity, I don't think most of us would be okay with that. And I'll say that about any country. I don't believe in ethno-states, I just don't. I believe in the equal human dignity of all people. I'm grateful that I live in the United States of America where there is no state religion, no state language, and no state identity. And I don't believe that people should be allowed to discriminate against one another or that we should have whole power structures based on who people are.

Jeff

23,536 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

91,587 просмотров • 8 дней назад

WESTERN TYPE OF ELECTIONS ARE NOW IN GRAVE JEOPARDY in southern African countries with a history of white settler colonialism or apartheid rule. This is because white monopoly interests in the region that are rooted in British and Portuguese white settler colonialism or apartheid rule - represented by white led organisations like the Brenthurst Foundation of the Oppenheimers - have identified elections as the new and most convenient battle ground for destabilising or toppling governing former liberation movements. Their new strategy is three-pronged: (i) they sponsor parties that they hope might win, as they did last month in Namibia; (ii) if their sponsored party loses, they fund their running dogs to dispute the results by challenging them in or outside the courts to delegitimatise the victory of the governing former liberation movement that would have won the election; again, as is the ongoing case in Namibia; or, (iii) if the country in question is fragile and has simmering or open violent conflict, as for example is the case with conflict-ridden Mozambique; they fund their running dogs to dispute the election results violently, and they use that violence to demand negotiations for a coalition or 'unity' government; with claims that the whole region will burn and South Africa will suffer the most from a refugee influx, if this does not happen. It is for this reason that elections in the southern African countries that suffered white settler colonialism or apartheid are no longer a democratic contest, but have become a clear and present national security danger; bordering on an existential threat. As a result, the state of democratic elections in the region has now reached another level!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

89,587 просмотров • 1 год назад