正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

During his interview with MSNOW's Symone Sanders-Townsend and Eugene Daniels, Hasan Piker talks about Hamas, the Palestinian resistance as a whole and the issue with the concept of a 'perfect victim.' He compares it with other liberation movements throughout history: "And that is the issue at the heart of... the matter; people want perfect victims. Whether they be Black people engaging in the Civil Rights' struggle, historically, whether it be the forces against apartheid in South Africa, whether it be the liberation struggle in Algeria. The expectation from the white moderate or the expectation from people who enjoy the order that exists in civilized society, is that people are not supposed to fight back and try to even match the intensity or the violence of the occupation, the colonial entity or the forces of police brutality that are defending white supremacy. So, that's the reason why I make this distinction. I want people to start thinking; what would they do in that situation? What would they do if they lived in the world's largest open air prison that's hermetically sealed, that is a nuclear armed state, that is backed by the most powerful entity on the planet?"show more

adri ♡

24,974 subscribers

6,043,582 次观看 • 8 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

21 条评论

jancarlo 的头像

jancarlo8 天前

yo he fucking cooked with that endorsing violence parallel

adri ♡ 的头像

adri ♡8 天前

HE DID SO FUCKING WELLLLL 😭 Symone was on his assssss

jancarlo 的头像

jancarlo8 天前

annoying as helll!!!! like come on man it's been three fuckin years of this shit‼️‼️‼️ 🫩🫩🫩🫩

adri ♡ 的头像

adri ♡8 天前

IT'S GONNA BE A BUSY MORNING FOR MEEEEEEE BEAR WITH ME YALL 😭 the clips will be comingggggg

michelle fights fascism 的头像

michelle fights fascism8 天前

You can tell by the look on their faces that he's educational universe above their understanding lol he cooked! More of us agree with him than not.

Mohamed Abdi🇵🇸 🌶🔻🍉 的头像

Mohamed Abdi🇵🇸 🌶🔻🍉8 天前

He was too smart for them.

QuesoHead🧀 的头像

QuesoHead🧀8 天前

When he made her say “wait so you’re saying people who protest police brutality are hamas? I can’t get behind that” That is when the light bulb was flickering for her and I think will be illuminating for other listeners

Kefiyyeh Brigade 🌹 的头像

Kefiyyeh Brigade 🌹8 天前

Oh shit he cooooooked Perfect clip to distribute to all your lib family and friends and the "white moderates". Thank you!

Kia Neaux 的头像

Kia Neaux8 天前

Piker drawing valid parallels between two types of state “silent” violence - Israeli on Palestinians & US police against Americans Symone Sanders objection is reminding me of conservative commentators in 2020

Mo شومون 的头像

Mo شومون8 天前

Really shut that lady up there. They really have NOTHING. Kudos to them for having the guts to interview him though. The bar is low but it is what it is.

Kat 的头像

Kat8 天前

Hasan is so articulate here.

Eki-Tiki-Taka 的头像

Eki-Tiki-Taka8 天前

Lmfao.... they have NO IDEA what they walked into. You honestly see Eugene's head spinning in the end.

Jonathan (Leo) 的头像

Jonathan (Leo)8 天前

Bro he cookin

bennny 的头像

bennny8 天前

“But that’s not my question” and he’s literally answering her question lol

Count The VOTE😷MaskUp 的头像

Count The VOTE😷MaskUp8 天前

He should use the Irish fighting English occupation as an example because they’re white. People are so colonised that they can’t grok resistance unless it’s perfectly peaceful.

Reggie The Don 👑 的头像

Reggie The Don 👑8 天前

Oppressed people ARE ALLOWED to meet violence w/ violence. The idea that you have to be a passive victim & let a violent oppressor kill you in order to get sympathy & support from the west is what I don’t like. Armed Resistance by Blk & Brown ppl is LEGAL under international law

frozen white tuna 的头像

frozen white tuna8 天前

she's such a disgusting careerist bitch

8-Bitpolar Bear 的头像

8-Bitpolar Bear8 天前

Cutting through! 👏

Capitalista de Sueldo Minimo 的头像

Capitalista de Sueldo Minimo8 天前

What's with the guy on the right? Is he practicing his Zoolander looks or something?

NoPasaNada 的头像

NoPasaNada8 天前

“Don’t tread on me” is also violence. Or what?

CITIZINS 的头像

CITIZINS8 天前

The hosts are some bitch ass black folks

相关视频

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The diplomats were never in charge and that is exactly why this war may not be over. Senator Ron Johnson says the people running Iran are the ones with the guns. They don't want a deal. And until the regime is disarmed or its own people are, it survives. "The people in charge of Iran are not the diplomats, not the ones who wanted to do a deal. The people in charge of Iran are the ones with the guns, and they don't want to do a deal." Senator Ron Johnson

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The diplomats were never in charge and that is exactly why this war may not be over. Senator Ron Johnson says the people running Iran are the ones with the guns. They don't want a deal. And until the regime is disarmed or its own people are, it survives. "The people in charge of Iran are not the diplomats, not the ones who wanted to do a deal. The people in charge of Iran are the ones with the guns, and they don't want to do a deal." Senator Ron Johnson

Mario Nawfal

42,555 次观看 • 4 个月前

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

RedWave Press

53,415 次观看 • 10 个月前

"Most people in the world, even in the United States, wish that the world was different. They want the world to be different. If you told them the idea of communism, most people would be like 'I'm down with that.'" -Boots Riley on communism and why it is scary for some people.

"Most people in the world, even in the United States, wish that the world was different. They want the world to be different. If you told them the idea of communism, most people would be like 'I'm down with that.'" -Boots Riley on communism and why it is scary for some people.

adri ♡

20,954 次观看 • 3 个月前

This Guy is right about Why the Epstein List will NOT be released. He says “…it’s because the names on that list would literally cause society to crumble. The trust would be gone in governments and everything in theaters and movies the richest people in the world would crash. And the richest people in the world are not gonna allow that which is why it's not being released. Why because the top F*cking people in the world are on that goddamn list and I think it needs to be released…” I already have no trust for the people in the Government, movie, music industries, etc and I definitely will NOT be shocked at who is on that list, but what I will be shocked about is if they do release the Epstein List.

This Guy is right about Why the Epstein List will NOT be released. He says “…it’s because the names on that list would literally cause society to crumble. The trust would be gone in governments and everything in theaters and movies the richest people in the world would crash. And the richest people in the world are not gonna allow that which is why it's not being released. Why because the top F*cking people in the world are on that goddamn list and I think it needs to be released…” I already have no trust for the people in the Government, movie, music industries, etc and I definitely will NOT be shocked at who is on that list, but what I will be shocked about is if they do release the Epstein List.

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

164,852 次观看 • 2 年前

.Scott Jennings on the left saying the administration is trying to stop “people” from voting... “What people? You say they don’t want people to vote? What?” “What evidence do you possibly have for that?” “The President does better in higher turnout environments. You know that, right?” “So, A, Trump and his coalition do better in higher turnout environments.” “The point is, if turnout were higher, his party would do better. [Georgetown constitutional law professor Michele Goodwin] is arguing erroneously, without any evidence, in a reckless fashion on this network that, somehow, the President of the United States is trying to stop people from voting. There is no evidence of that whatsoever.” “The only people they care about are people who shouldn’t be on the voter rolls, like illegal aliens, or people who aren’t eligible to vote, and the problem with the mail-in ballots, which are inherently less secure than voting in person, is that in a lot of states, they don't clean up their voting rolls, and they send out millions of mail-in ballots to people, whether they ask for them or not, and many addresses get multiple ballots, and there’s a lot of live ballots out on the street. These states refuse to clean up their voter rolls. That's absolutely true, and you have to ask yourself, why would you want fraudulent registrations on your voter rolls? Why would you fight that?” “He wants people who are legally eligible American citizens to vote and not have their votes diluted by people who are ineligible or illegal.”

.Scott Jennings on the left saying the administration is trying to stop “people” from voting... “What people? You say they don’t want people to vote? What?” “What evidence do you possibly have for that?” “The President does better in higher turnout environments. You know that, right?” “So, A, Trump and his coalition do better in higher turnout environments.” “The point is, if turnout were higher, his party would do better. [Georgetown constitutional law professor Michele Goodwin] is arguing erroneously, without any evidence, in a reckless fashion on this network that, somehow, the President of the United States is trying to stop people from voting. There is no evidence of that whatsoever.” “The only people they care about are people who shouldn’t be on the voter rolls, like illegal aliens, or people who aren’t eligible to vote, and the problem with the mail-in ballots, which are inherently less secure than voting in person, is that in a lot of states, they don't clean up their voting rolls, and they send out millions of mail-in ballots to people, whether they ask for them or not, and many addresses get multiple ballots, and there’s a lot of live ballots out on the street. These states refuse to clean up their voter rolls. That's absolutely true, and you have to ask yourself, why would you want fraudulent registrations on your voter rolls? Why would you fight that?” “He wants people who are legally eligible American citizens to vote and not have their votes diluted by people who are ineligible or illegal.”

Curtis Houck

106,399 次观看 • 29 天前

This is reportedly a recording of the phone call that settlers in the north are receiving from Hezbollah. The audio warns the listener to evacuate the settlement, stating that it belongs to them, and says that when they arrive, they will decide whether the remaining people will be captured or killed.

This is reportedly a recording of the phone call that settlers in the north are receiving from Hezbollah. The audio warns the listener to evacuate the settlement, stating that it belongs to them, and says that when they arrive, they will decide whether the remaining people will be captured or killed.

barry with the NED

262,369 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI JUST DROPPED THE TRUTH BOMB! "One of the reasons the regime wants a TOTAL INTERNET BLACKOUT is that people like yourselves won't hear what the people in Iran actually have to SAY about this." "The narrative is CONTROLLED completely by the REGIME, and that's what he's trying to push, whether it’s the mainstream media in the outside world to let you believe that people are in fact REJECTING that INTERVENTION." It's actually quite the OPPOSITE. The majority of the Iranian people look at this as LIBERATION CAMPAIGN. "imagine the circumstances during the second world war, imagine you were a French person who was living under the occupation of the Nazi regime, and when the the allies disembarked in on the British of Normandy, that was a campaign for liberation of a country that would otherwise have to face Hitler and his regime." "in this case we are dealing with the regime that has from the very beginning taken our compatriots at their first HOSTAGES and have kept them behind bars, this intervention is LIBERATION for US, so it's a welcome act that will help us finally get RID of this regime, which is the final ask of the Iranian people." "They have had it with this regime, they no longer want it, this regime is totally ILLEGITIMATE, it's just trying to use COERCION and FEAR to maintain itself in POWER. And try to buy TIME and ride the storm so there's no longer a Bibi Netanyahu in Jerusalem or Donald Trump in the white house that could really put pressure on this regime. That's why tactically they are trying to buy time and that has always been their modus operandi in all these years." #RezaPahlavi‌ForIran Reza Pahlavi

🚨PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI JUST DROPPED THE TRUTH BOMB! "One of the reasons the regime wants a TOTAL INTERNET BLACKOUT is that people like yourselves won't hear what the people in Iran actually have to SAY about this." "The narrative is CONTROLLED completely by the REGIME, and that's what he's trying to push, whether it’s the mainstream media in the outside world to let you believe that people are in fact REJECTING that INTERVENTION." It's actually quite the OPPOSITE. The majority of the Iranian people look at this as LIBERATION CAMPAIGN. "imagine the circumstances during the second world war, imagine you were a French person who was living under the occupation of the Nazi regime, and when the the allies disembarked in on the British of Normandy, that was a campaign for liberation of a country that would otherwise have to face Hitler and his regime." "in this case we are dealing with the regime that has from the very beginning taken our compatriots at their first HOSTAGES and have kept them behind bars, this intervention is LIBERATION for US, so it's a welcome act that will help us finally get RID of this regime, which is the final ask of the Iranian people." "They have had it with this regime, they no longer want it, this regime is totally ILLEGITIMATE, it's just trying to use COERCION and FEAR to maintain itself in POWER. And try to buy TIME and ride the storm so there's no longer a Bibi Netanyahu in Jerusalem or Donald Trump in the white house that could really put pressure on this regime. That's why tactically they are trying to buy time and that has always been their modus operandi in all these years." #RezaPahlavi‌ForIran Reza Pahlavi

Neo

105,119 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

Red Pill USA

760,219 次观看 • 2 年前

The reason why Donald Trump is using the military and the National Guard against Black people in DC because majority of white people are OK with it. that included majority of Democrats and Republicans. they have always supported police brutality against Black people.

The reason why Donald Trump is using the military and the National Guard against Black people in DC because majority of white people are OK with it. that included majority of Democrats and Republicans. they have always supported police brutality against Black people.

Don Salmon

38,880 次观看 • 1 年前

The notion that Black people are violent, is propaganda and projection, by imperialists. Black people do not a have history of violence towards white people, in the way white people have a history of violence towards Black people. The propaganda that colonial powers have spread, is merely a way to distract from their brutal and immoral past.

The notion that Black people are violent, is propaganda and projection, by imperialists. Black people do not a have history of violence towards white people, in the way white people have a history of violence towards Black people. The propaganda that colonial powers have spread, is merely a way to distract from their brutal and immoral past.

Save Our Citizenships 🔻

22,484 次观看 • 10 个月前

“What Do You Mean by Jewish State?” Abdul El-Sayed Pushes Back Katie Halper: So, speaking of AIPAC and people who are very supportive of Israel, there was an interesting interaction between you and Olivia Reingold of The Free Press. Olivia Reingold: Abdul El-Sayed, who is Muslim, walks a fine line on the Jewish state. He told the crowd, “All of us love and revere Jewish folk, our Jewish neighbors, the faith of Judaism.” Later that night, I asked him whether he believes in Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I'd love to take the question, actually. What do you mean by Jewish state? If you can't define the question, I'm not going to answer your question. Katie Halper: So, it's fascinating to me that “What does a Jewish state mean?” can be a gotcha question. Do you think most people would have a different opinion if they understood what the current Jewish state of Israel means? Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I think most people have in their heart of hearts a commitment to foundational equity—that everybody deserves equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination. The reason I asked that question is because it's very difficult to square that question with equal rights for Palestinian people. Whether you're defining a Jewish state based on an actual state religion, which means that some people don't belong as much because they may not belong to the same faith. And then if you're doing it by identity, the question becomes, well, is it the identity of the leadership or is it the majority of the country? All of these become really, really difficult to square with any semblance of equal rights. If your interpretation of the identity of a state would then allow that state to discriminate against people for how they pray or because of their ethnicity, I don't think most of us would be okay with that. And I'll say that about any country. I don't believe in ethno-states, I just don't. I believe in the equal human dignity of all people. I'm grateful that I live in the United States of America where there is no state religion, no state language, and no state identity. And I don't believe that people should be allowed to discriminate against one another or that we should have whole power structures based on who people are.

“What Do You Mean by Jewish State?” Abdul El-Sayed Pushes Back Katie Halper: So, speaking of AIPAC and people who are very supportive of Israel, there was an interesting interaction between you and Olivia Reingold of The Free Press. Olivia Reingold: Abdul El-Sayed, who is Muslim, walks a fine line on the Jewish state. He told the crowd, “All of us love and revere Jewish folk, our Jewish neighbors, the faith of Judaism.” Later that night, I asked him whether he believes in Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I'd love to take the question, actually. What do you mean by Jewish state? If you can't define the question, I'm not going to answer your question. Katie Halper: So, it's fascinating to me that “What does a Jewish state mean?” can be a gotcha question. Do you think most people would have a different opinion if they understood what the current Jewish state of Israel means? Dr. Abdul El-Sayed: I think most people have in their heart of hearts a commitment to foundational equity—that everybody deserves equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination. The reason I asked that question is because it's very difficult to square that question with equal rights for Palestinian people. Whether you're defining a Jewish state based on an actual state religion, which means that some people don't belong as much because they may not belong to the same faith. And then if you're doing it by identity, the question becomes, well, is it the identity of the leadership or is it the majority of the country? All of these become really, really difficult to square with any semblance of equal rights. If your interpretation of the identity of a state would then allow that state to discriminate against people for how they pray or because of their ethnicity, I don't think most of us would be okay with that. And I'll say that about any country. I don't believe in ethno-states, I just don't. I believe in the equal human dignity of all people. I'm grateful that I live in the United States of America where there is no state religion, no state language, and no state identity. And I don't believe that people should be allowed to discriminate against one another or that we should have whole power structures based on who people are.

Jeff

23,536 次观看 • 1 个月前

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

91,587 次观看 • 8 天前

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Seethroughitall

23,716 次观看 • 7 个月前

My deep concern is that there is a coverup of vaccine injuries in the Department of Defense, and that they are playing games with the data so that we can’t actually assess whether it’s the vaccine or the ailment that is causing these acute conditions. Wouldn’t it be a tragic thing to discover that we hurt people with the vaccine more so than the virus did?

My deep concern is that there is a coverup of vaccine injuries in the Department of Defense, and that they are playing games with the data so that we can’t actually assess whether it’s the vaccine or the ailment that is causing these acute conditions. Wouldn’t it be a tragic thing to discover that we hurt people with the vaccine more so than the virus did?

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

947,072 次观看 • 2 年前

WESTERN TYPE OF ELECTIONS ARE NOW IN GRAVE JEOPARDY in southern African countries with a history of white settler colonialism or apartheid rule. This is because white monopoly interests in the region that are rooted in British and Portuguese white settler colonialism or apartheid rule - represented by white led organisations like the Brenthurst Foundation of the Oppenheimers - have identified elections as the new and most convenient battle ground for destabilising or toppling governing former liberation movements. Their new strategy is three-pronged: (i) they sponsor parties that they hope might win, as they did last month in Namibia; (ii) if their sponsored party loses, they fund their running dogs to dispute the results by challenging them in or outside the courts to delegitimatise the victory of the governing former liberation movement that would have won the election; again, as is the ongoing case in Namibia; or, (iii) if the country in question is fragile and has simmering or open violent conflict, as for example is the case with conflict-ridden Mozambique; they fund their running dogs to dispute the election results violently, and they use that violence to demand negotiations for a coalition or 'unity' government; with claims that the whole region will burn and South Africa will suffer the most from a refugee influx, if this does not happen. It is for this reason that elections in the southern African countries that suffered white settler colonialism or apartheid are no longer a democratic contest, but have become a clear and present national security danger; bordering on an existential threat. As a result, the state of democratic elections in the region has now reached another level!

WESTERN TYPE OF ELECTIONS ARE NOW IN GRAVE JEOPARDY in southern African countries with a history of white settler colonialism or apartheid rule. This is because white monopoly interests in the region that are rooted in British and Portuguese white settler colonialism or apartheid rule - represented by white led organisations like the Brenthurst Foundation of the Oppenheimers - have identified elections as the new and most convenient battle ground for destabilising or toppling governing former liberation movements. Their new strategy is three-pronged: (i) they sponsor parties that they hope might win, as they did last month in Namibia; (ii) if their sponsored party loses, they fund their running dogs to dispute the results by challenging them in or outside the courts to delegitimatise the victory of the governing former liberation movement that would have won the election; again, as is the ongoing case in Namibia; or, (iii) if the country in question is fragile and has simmering or open violent conflict, as for example is the case with conflict-ridden Mozambique; they fund their running dogs to dispute the election results violently, and they use that violence to demand negotiations for a coalition or 'unity' government; with claims that the whole region will burn and South Africa will suffer the most from a refugee influx, if this does not happen. It is for this reason that elections in the southern African countries that suffered white settler colonialism or apartheid are no longer a democratic contest, but have become a clear and present national security danger; bordering on an existential threat. As a result, the state of democratic elections in the region has now reached another level!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

89,587 次观看 • 1 年前

🇦🇲🇷🇺🇹🇷 Pashinyan denounces the struggle of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire and blames Russia for it. "From the 1830s until 2023, all of us in Armenia have viewed the world through Zatulin's (Russia's) eyes. And the choice is as follows. In 2026, the citizens of Armenia have to make a choice, whether they trust what they see with their own eyes, or whether they trust the eyes of Zatulin (Russia). Do they agree that we should again enter the cycle of history that started in the 1850s and ended in 2023, and during that time, what happened? We are no longer a nation treated as a victim of history."

🇦🇲🇷🇺🇹🇷 Pashinyan denounces the struggle of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire and blames Russia for it. "From the 1830s until 2023, all of us in Armenia have viewed the world through Zatulin's (Russia's) eyes. And the choice is as follows. In 2026, the citizens of Armenia have to make a choice, whether they trust what they see with their own eyes, or whether they trust the eyes of Zatulin (Russia). Do they agree that we should again enter the cycle of history that started in the 1850s and ended in 2023, and during that time, what happened? We are no longer a nation treated as a victim of history."

Prince du Karabaque

443,658 次观看 • 7 个月前