Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

During Senator Markwayne Mullin’s Markwayne Mullin Senate hearing, Florida U.S. Senator Rick Scott Rick Scott asked Mullin, “Do you have any ability to BAN funding to sanctuary cities that ignore the federal laws meant to make citizens’ lives safer, but then turn around and ask for federal money for...

LauraLoomer's profile picture

Laura Loomer

1,891,589 subscribers

187,819 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT): “Now that you are on the job, can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE is doing, something DHS is doing, is illegal, is unconstitutional, tells you to stop — that you will comply with the court order?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We will never break the Constitution, and we’re not going to break the law, but we’re gonna enforce our nation’s laws, and we’re gonna enforce the laws that you guys passed, and that we implement. We will never go outside that, and if we do, we will hold each other accountable for that.” Chris Murphy: “But that doesn’t sound like the same thing as committing that you will obey a court order. Obviously, the entire structure of the federal government gives the power to the federal court to divine whether you are obeying or not. I mean, I think it’s an easy thing to say. Will you or will you not implement court orders?” Markwayne Mullin: “If we didn’t think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law. And we can see that because we see how many times —” Chris Murphy: “You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey?” Markwayne Mullin: “We’re saying we’re going to enforce the law and we’re never gonna break the Constitution.”
2:08

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT): “Now that you are on the job, can you commit to us that if a court judges something ICE is doing, something DHS is doing, is illegal, is unconstitutional, tells you to stop — that you will comply with the court order?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We will never break the Constitution, and we’re not going to break the law, but we’re gonna enforce our nation’s laws, and we’re gonna enforce the laws that you guys passed, and that we implement. We will never go outside that, and if we do, we will hold each other accountable for that.” Chris Murphy: “But that doesn’t sound like the same thing as committing that you will obey a court order. Obviously, the entire structure of the federal government gives the power to the federal court to divine whether you are obeying or not. I mean, I think it’s an easy thing to say. Will you or will you not implement court orders?” Markwayne Mullin: “If we didn’t think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law. And we can see that because we see how many times —” Chris Murphy: “You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey?” Markwayne Mullin: “We’re saying we’re going to enforce the law and we’re never gonna break the Constitution.”

RedWave Press

126,818 views • 3 months ago

🚨🚨Secretary Markwayne Mullin has a message for sanctuary cities that REFUSE to cooperate with federal enforcement👇👇👇 “We are going to keep our men and women that are enforcing the law safe and if we have to pull them from the airport we will” “We’re not pulling them out just because they’re sanctuary cities, we are going to pull them out because the state and the local government is refusing to do their jobs”
0:36

🚨🚨Secretary Markwayne Mullin has a message for sanctuary cities that REFUSE to cooperate with federal enforcement👇👇👇 “We are going to keep our men and women that are enforcing the law safe and if we have to pull them from the airport we will” “We’re not pulling them out just because they’re sanctuary cities, we are going to pull them out because the state and the local government is refusing to do their jobs”

America Reports

58,159 views • 3 months ago

THREAD: 🚨Simple and Popular Steps DHS Homeland Security Can Take Under Newly Nominated DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s Leadership to Get Mass Deportations Back on Track Markwayne Mullin 🚨 Many people have expressed their concerns that mass deportation numbers are beginning to slip. This can largely be attributed to the multiple upheavals levied against DHS Homeland Security by House and Senate Democrats. However, there are some steps Secretary Markwayne Mullin Markwayne Mullin can take as DHS Secretary that would streamline the mass deportations process. First, let’s focus on the victories that Secretary Mullin has already achieved. On March 18, 2026, Senate Democrats believed they had Mullin in a “gotcha” moment as Senator Andy Kim from New Jersey asked Mullin if he would rescind former Secretary Kristi Noem Kristi Noem’s rule, which required the DHS Secretary to personally review DHS contracts over $100k. Mullin committed that he would, saying: “That’s called micromanaging. And I don’t know if Secretary [Noem] put that in or someone else did. I’m not a micromanager. We put people in, we empower them to make decisions. What is required to come up to my level, we’ll make decisions. We will have a very clear line of communication with every one of our agency’s heads on their authority that you gave to them within their parameters, and we’ll discuss. But we’re also going to be very responsible for the taxpayer dollars.” It looks like Secretary Markwayne Mullin put his money where his mouth is. WATCH 👇🏻
1:15

THREAD: 🚨Simple and Popular Steps DHS Homeland Security Can Take Under Newly Nominated DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s Leadership to Get Mass Deportations Back on Track Markwayne Mullin 🚨 Many people have expressed their concerns that mass deportation numbers are beginning to slip. This can largely be attributed to the multiple upheavals levied against DHS Homeland Security by House and Senate Democrats. However, there are some steps Secretary Markwayne Mullin Markwayne Mullin can take as DHS Secretary that would streamline the mass deportations process. First, let’s focus on the victories that Secretary Mullin has already achieved. On March 18, 2026, Senate Democrats believed they had Mullin in a “gotcha” moment as Senator Andy Kim from New Jersey asked Mullin if he would rescind former Secretary Kristi Noem Kristi Noem’s rule, which required the DHS Secretary to personally review DHS contracts over $100k. Mullin committed that he would, saying: “That’s called micromanaging. And I don’t know if Secretary [Noem] put that in or someone else did. I’m not a micromanager. We put people in, we empower them to make decisions. What is required to come up to my level, we’ll make decisions. We will have a very clear line of communication with every one of our agency’s heads on their authority that you gave to them within their parameters, and we’ll discuss. But we’re also going to be very responsible for the taxpayer dollars.” It looks like Secretary Markwayne Mullin put his money where his mouth is. WATCH 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

45,176 views • 5 months ago

Sen. Murphy to Mullin: "Will you or will you not implement court orders?" Mullin: "If we didn't think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law." Murphy: "...If you're a Republic or a Democrat on this committee, you should be really, really freaked out."
1:06

Sen. Murphy to Mullin: "Will you or will you not implement court orders?" Mullin: "If we didn't think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that. But we see courts over and over again that use their bench for their political opinion, not just the rule of law." Murphy: "...If you're a Republic or a Democrat on this committee, you should be really, really freaked out."

The Bulwark

78,265 views • 3 months ago

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin said Tuesday that he is considering ending the processing of international travelers through sanctuary cities: “If they’re not enforcing immigration laws, then why would I be processing immigration in their city and turn them loose in their city?” If Democrats don’t want to fund Customs and Border Patrol, then Democrats don’t get to use them. Mullin added, “I don’t think sanctuary cities are legal.” (cspanofficial on TT)
1:53

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin said Tuesday that he is considering ending the processing of international travelers through sanctuary cities: “If they’re not enforcing immigration laws, then why would I be processing immigration in their city and turn them loose in their city?” If Democrats don’t want to fund Customs and Border Patrol, then Democrats don’t get to use them. Mullin added, “I don’t think sanctuary cities are legal.” (cspanofficial on TT)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

41,244 views • 5 months ago

.Secretary Markwayne Mullin BREAKING: DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Drops Bombshell on Sanctuary Cities. In a bold new stance, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin is signaling a major crackdown: Sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement could lose customs and immigration processing at their international airports. Mullin said Tuesday: “If they’re not enforcing immigration laws, then why would I be processing immigration in their city and turn them loose in their city?” He added: “If Democrats don’t want to fund Customs and Border Patrol, then Democrats don’t get to use them.” Mullin also declared: “I don’t think sanctuary cities are legal.” The comments, made during remarks covered by C-SPAN, come as the Trump administration demands cooperation from cities receiving federal resources. No more free rides. Cities that shield illegal immigrants may soon watch their international airports grind to a halt on customs processing. What do you think — should sanctuary cities face real consequences? 🇺🇸 Share if you support enforcing the law everywhere!
1:53

.Secretary Markwayne Mullin BREAKING: DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin Drops Bombshell on Sanctuary Cities. In a bold new stance, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin is signaling a major crackdown: Sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement could lose customs and immigration processing at their international airports. Mullin said Tuesday: “If they’re not enforcing immigration laws, then why would I be processing immigration in their city and turn them loose in their city?” He added: “If Democrats don’t want to fund Customs and Border Patrol, then Democrats don’t get to use them.” Mullin also declared: “I don’t think sanctuary cities are legal.” The comments, made during remarks covered by C-SPAN, come as the Trump administration demands cooperation from cities receiving federal resources. No more free rides. Cities that shield illegal immigrants may soon watch their international airports grind to a halt on customs processing. What do you think — should sanctuary cities face real consequences? 🇺🇸 Share if you support enforcing the law everywhere!

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

70,801 views • 5 months ago

.Secretary Markwayne Mullin speaks upon swearing in as the 9th Secretary of Homeland Security: "I don’t care what color your state is. I don't care if you're red or you're blue. At the end of the day, my job is to be Secretary of Homeland and to protect everybody the same—and we will do that."
1:21

.Secretary Markwayne Mullin speaks upon swearing in as the 9th Secretary of Homeland Security: "I don’t care what color your state is. I don't care if you're red or you're blue. At the end of the day, my job is to be Secretary of Homeland and to protect everybody the same—and we will do that."

Rapid Response 47

182,717 views • 6 months ago

.Secretary Markwayne Mullin: "Some of these cities have international airports... If they're a 'sanctuary city' and they're receiving international flights — and we're asking them to partner with us at the airport, but once they walk out of the airport, they're not going to enforce immigration policy — maybe we need to have a really hard look at that."
1:08

.Secretary Markwayne Mullin: "Some of these cities have international airports... If they're a 'sanctuary city' and they're receiving international flights — and we're asking them to partner with us at the airport, but once they walk out of the airport, they're not going to enforce immigration policy — maybe we need to have a really hard look at that."

Rapid Response 47

297,578 views • 5 months ago

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin said Wednesday that ICE officers working during this summer's FIFA World Cup will enforce immigration laws, "but we're not there for solely that purpose." "So if we find a felon, or we find someone doing customs, we're going to go after them," he told CBS News' Nicole Sganga. When asked whether immigration enforcement during the tournament is off the table, Mullin said, "We're not there to go round up mass individuals, but we are always looking for the worst of the worst. We are going to continue to do that."
1:11

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin said Wednesday that ICE officers working during this summer's FIFA World Cup will enforce immigration laws, "but we're not there for solely that purpose." "So if we find a felon, or we find someone doing customs, we're going to go after them," he told CBS News' Nicole Sganga. When asked whether immigration enforcement during the tournament is off the table, Mullin said, "We're not there to go round up mass individuals, but we are always looking for the worst of the worst. We are going to continue to do that."

CBS News

35,815 views • 4 months ago

🚨 NOW: DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin REFUSES to rule out sending ICE agents to polling places in the 2026 midterms "The only people in line SHOULD be American citizens...should be no REASON to have any type of that..." 💯 He's right! Why are they so concerned if "illegals never vote?"
2:06

🚨 NOW: DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin REFUSES to rule out sending ICE agents to polling places in the 2026 midterms "The only people in line SHOULD be American citizens...should be no REASON to have any type of that..." 💯 He's right! Why are they so concerned if "illegals never vote?"

Eric Daugherty

144,324 views • 3 months ago

ERLING HAALAND REFUSES TO SHOW ANGER WHEN HE IS SUBBED OUT, OUT OF RESPECT FOR HIS TEAMMATES. "WHEN I SCORE 5 GOALS, I WANT TO SCORE 6 BUT THE GUY THAT COMES IN FOR ME, IT WOULD BE REALLY BE DISRESPECTFUL IF I WOULD BE COME OUT AND BE PISSED OFF FOR HIM COMING IN AND GETTING AN OPPURTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING OR TO PLAY, SO THAT'S THE LAST THING I WOULD BE IS TO SHOW ANYONE THAT I'M PISSED OFF"
0:28

ERLING HAALAND REFUSES TO SHOW ANGER WHEN HE IS SUBBED OUT, OUT OF RESPECT FOR HIS TEAMMATES. "WHEN I SCORE 5 GOALS, I WANT TO SCORE 6 BUT THE GUY THAT COMES IN FOR ME, IT WOULD BE REALLY BE DISRESPECTFUL IF I WOULD BE COME OUT AND BE PISSED OFF FOR HIM COMING IN AND GETTING AN OPPURTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING OR TO PLAY, SO THAT'S THE LAST THING I WOULD BE IS TO SHOW ANYONE THAT I'M PISSED OFF"

daz

1,707,157 views • 2 months ago

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."
2:55

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."

The Bulwark

25,818 views • 6 months ago

MULLIN: "If they're a sanctuary city, should they really be processing customs? ... We're asking them to partner with us at the airport, but once they walk out of the airport, they're not going to enforce immigration policy? Maybe we need to have a really hard look at that."
1:22

MULLIN: "If they're a sanctuary city, should they really be processing customs? ... We're asking them to partner with us at the airport, but once they walk out of the airport, they're not going to enforce immigration policy? Maybe we need to have a really hard look at that."

Trump War Room

48,034 views • 5 months ago

Iga Swiatek on constantly being filmed at Australian Open and other tournaments, ‘The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? It would be nice to have some privacy’ “I wanted to ask something that Coco was talking about last night. The cameras backstage at the tournament… I know you got filmed recently forgetting your credential… you’re sort of always on camera at a lot of different tournament areas.. I’m wondering if you think there should be more privacy for players and their teams as they’re back there? Or how you see the balance of that versus them trying to have entertainment and content coming out.” Iga: “The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? Where they are observed even when they’re pooping. Ok, that was exaggerating obviously, but it would be nice to have some privacy. It would be nice also to have your own process and not always be observed. For example, in other sports, you have some technical things you wanna do. It would be nice to have some space you can do that without the whole world watching. On Wimbledon there are courts where people with accreditation can get there but it’s without the fans. There are some tournaments where it’s impossible and you’re constantly observed. I don’t think it should be like that because we are tennis players. We’re meant to be watched on court and in the press. That’s our job. It’s not our job to be a meme when you forget your accreditation. It’s funny for sure. People have something to talk about. For us, I don’t think it’s necessary.” “Have you talked to the tournament about it here?” Iga: “What’s the point?” (via Australian Open Press)
1:58

Iga Swiatek on constantly being filmed at Australian Open and other tournaments, ‘The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? It would be nice to have some privacy’ “I wanted to ask something that Coco was talking about last night. The cameras backstage at the tournament… I know you got filmed recently forgetting your credential… you’re sort of always on camera at a lot of different tournament areas.. I’m wondering if you think there should be more privacy for players and their teams as they’re back there? Or how you see the balance of that versus them trying to have entertainment and content coming out.” Iga: “The question is, are we tennis players? Or are we animals in the zoo? Where they are observed even when they’re pooping. Ok, that was exaggerating obviously, but it would be nice to have some privacy. It would be nice also to have your own process and not always be observed. For example, in other sports, you have some technical things you wanna do. It would be nice to have some space you can do that without the whole world watching. On Wimbledon there are courts where people with accreditation can get there but it’s without the fans. There are some tournaments where it’s impossible and you’re constantly observed. I don’t think it should be like that because we are tennis players. We’re meant to be watched on court and in the press. That’s our job. It’s not our job to be a meme when you forget your accreditation. It’s funny for sure. People have something to talk about. For us, I don’t think it’s necessary.” “Have you talked to the tournament about it here?” Iga: “What’s the point?” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

596,858 views • 8 months ago

CNN’s Jake Tapper: “If the 350,000 Temporary Protected Status holders right now start applying for permanent status, start applying for visas, will they not be deported? Is that a way for them to stay in the U.S. legal?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “Well, it depends on if they qualify or not. Underneath some visas, when you overstay your visa… you have to go back to the country you came from.” “There's a lot of things that take into consideration. First of all, have you been here and been charged with a felony, or do you have a criminal background? Do you have pending charges against you? Those won't be accepted.” “If you have been here and you have been living off the taxpayer dollars, meaning that you have you're part of social, those won't be accepted either. If you have been here and you have had a full-time paying job, under some circumstances, those would apply.” “But you have to go through the regular steps that every other immigrant that wants to come to the country legally has to go through.”
1:27

CNN’s Jake Tapper: “If the 350,000 Temporary Protected Status holders right now start applying for permanent status, start applying for visas, will they not be deported? Is that a way for them to stay in the U.S. legal?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “Well, it depends on if they qualify or not. Underneath some visas, when you overstay your visa… you have to go back to the country you came from.” “There's a lot of things that take into consideration. First of all, have you been here and been charged with a felony, or do you have a criminal background? Do you have pending charges against you? Those won't be accepted.” “If you have been here and you have been living off the taxpayer dollars, meaning that you have you're part of social, those won't be accepted either. If you have been here and you have had a full-time paying job, under some circumstances, those would apply.” “But you have to go through the regular steps that every other immigrant that wants to come to the country legally has to go through.”

RedWave Press

204,904 views • 2 months ago

Murphy: Can you commit to us that if judge finds that what DHS is illegal, that you will comply with the court order? Mullin: If we didn't think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that Murphy: You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey? Mullin: Don’t put words in my mouth. Murphy: You just said you may not follow court orders— Mullin: Don’t put words in my mouth. Murphy: Will you implement court orders? Mullin: You're making an assumption on court orders I haven't seen Murphy: If you're a Republican or a Democrat on this committee, you should be really, really freaked out— Mullin: We should be really concerned about the rulings that come out of the courts.
2:07

Murphy: Can you commit to us that if judge finds that what DHS is illegal, that you will comply with the court order? Mullin: If we didn't think courts were politicized, then I would probably be able to answer that Murphy: You’re going to pick and choose what court orders you obey? Mullin: Don’t put words in my mouth. Murphy: You just said you may not follow court orders— Mullin: Don’t put words in my mouth. Murphy: Will you implement court orders? Mullin: You're making an assumption on court orders I haven't seen Murphy: If you're a Republican or a Democrat on this committee, you should be really, really freaked out— Mullin: We should be really concerned about the rulings that come out of the courts.

Acyn

193,325 views • 3 months ago

Kaine: Chris asked Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Senator Jim Risch: ‘When are we going to have a public hearing about this war? When?’ Senator Risch responded: ‘I have decided that we will not have public hearings because I do not believe the administration’s decision-makers should be subject to public questioning by senators.’ I mean, can you believe that? I give him credit—I’ll give him credit for candor—but they do not believe that civilian decision-makers should be subject to questions by United States senators. If they were secure in the justness of their cause or the adequacy of their plan, they would not be afraid to answer public questions about what they’re doing.
1:53

Kaine: Chris asked Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair Senator Jim Risch: ‘When are we going to have a public hearing about this war? When?’ Senator Risch responded: ‘I have decided that we will not have public hearings because I do not believe the administration’s decision-makers should be subject to public questioning by senators.’ I mean, can you believe that? I give him credit—I’ll give him credit for candor—but they do not believe that civilian decision-makers should be subject to questions by United States senators. If they were secure in the justness of their cause or the adequacy of their plan, they would not be afraid to answer public questions about what they’re doing.

Acyn

455,969 views • 6 months ago

CNN’s Kasie Hunt: “The president recently signed an executive order to build a state-by-state citizenship list of eligible voters. What is DHS going to do with voter information?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We’re going to make sure that our constitution is upheld, meaning that ONLY citizens of the United States are voting. That’s the most important thing we can do to protect the integrity of our elections.” “It’s what SAVES America... That we’re not having GAMES like you might see in Sanctuary cities… Why wouldn’t we want to make sure it’s safe?” “The ONLY people that should be voting in federal elections are true American citizens.”
1:34

CNN’s Kasie Hunt: “The president recently signed an executive order to build a state-by-state citizenship list of eligible voters. What is DHS going to do with voter information?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “We’re going to make sure that our constitution is upheld, meaning that ONLY citizens of the United States are voting. That’s the most important thing we can do to protect the integrity of our elections.” “It’s what SAVES America... That we’re not having GAMES like you might see in Sanctuary cities… Why wouldn’t we want to make sure it’s safe?” “The ONLY people that should be voting in federal elections are true American citizens.”

RedWave Press

112,984 views • 3 months ago