Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

During the Conversion Therapy Bill debate Jonathan Buckley seeks to find out how many gender identities this bill includes under that term but yet the Speaker 🇮🇪🇵🇸🏳️‍⚧️CarálNíChuilín, Is Deontóir Mé ✊ shuts down the conversation claiming its not for anyone to discuss, its just self determination. This has no... show more

WRN NI

5,044 subscribers

19,963 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Здоровье и велнес

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 18

Фото профиля TortieCats 😺 💚🤍💜

TortieCats 😺 💚🤍💜8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin You cannot have legislation that does not set out clearly defined terms. It would be unworkable. The Bill should not have made it this far.

Фото профиля WRN NI

WRN NI8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin The dreaded Private Members Bill, that is never thought through or properly scrutinised!!!

Фото профиля TortieCats 😺 💚🤍💜

TortieCats 😺 💚🤍💜8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Indeed.

Фото профиля nwl

nwl8 дней назад

Down here two years ago, a Senator in our Seanad spent 25 minutes listing the thousands of genders (taking the piss out of the whole proposition). We still ended up with a law in 2024 which refers to gender as the gender a person expresses and includes transgender and a gender other than male or female. It has never been contested in the courts.

Фото профиля Lauren

Lauren8 дней назад

@DerryBanShee @JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Ultimately it is interfering with an individual’s right to non belief…in anything. It is a new blasphemy law by stealth

Фото профиля Jane

Jane8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin If it isn’t for anyone to discuss, it isn’t for anyone to prosecute.

Фото профиля Zandra Bill 🐦

Zandra Bill 🐦8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Cullen and Tennyson have brains the size of a walnut and shouldn't be in government let alone dreaming up legislation.

Фото профиля Lainey

Lainey8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin No discussion, no debate. Yet women cannot self determine. They force the opening of our sex class to men with this ideology and now move the goalposts to secure harmful legislation against safeguarding. Reprehensible, dangerous and a back door to self ID.

Фото профиля Trevor G Cast

Trevor G Cast8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Proof beyond all doubt handling explosives rots the 'Grey-cells" Worra Fook-wit @CaralNiChuilin , if you can't debate a bill you certainly can't vote on it.

Фото профиля Una Smart

Una Smart8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Idiocy

Фото профиля Mollymog

Mollymog8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin This is what happens when people with no experience of life, commerce or the wants and needs of ordinary people come to power.

Фото профиля Granny Mary

Granny Mary8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin @SocDemsLK good luck trying to push this gender woo conversion therapy ban down south. Look at the state of them trying to explain themselves today in Stormont 🤓

Фото профиля Deardra 🐾👣🍁🍂

Deardra 🐾👣🍁🍂8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin They haven't a clue what they're doing. Amateurs

Фото профиля Granny Mary

Granny Mary8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin This bill is an embarrassment. But of course the council of Europe says jump and politicians say "how high?" Gender identity Ideology is always a disaster.

Фото профиля abc123

abc1238 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin I'd never vote for Sinn Fein again. That Party is unrecognisable since Martin McGuinness stepped down as leader. I wouldn't vote for any of them scummy Political Parties except for Aontu and only Aontu. Aontu are the way forward if you have a brain and common sense.

Фото профиля William Posters

William Posters8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Is Carol Chuilan a love child of WorzelGummidge, with all that money she is given you would have thought she could find a decent hairdresser!

Фото профиля Fallenlord

Fallenlord8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Deviants the lot of them.

Фото профиля Ellim

Ellim8 дней назад

@JBuckleyMLA @CaralNiChuilin Dear God, how far we have fallen, meanwhile 102 calls to try and get a GP yesterday. Shame on Alliance and this woke speaker as well.

Похожие видео

Another remarkable clip from Wiener’s SB 934 hearing. Hearing Wiener imagine being a parent is bizarre, but I want to focus on the committee’s inability to understand the bill they are voting on. Few realize California lawmakers have been inserting “gender” nonsense into state law for decades. It starts in 1998, when “gender” is added to the hate crime code. Then it appears in the Education Code, opening the door to boys in girls’ bathrooms. By 2003, “gender identity” enters the Government Code. In 2005, female-only public accommodations are gone. In 2007, the biological definition of sex is stripped from the Education Code. By 2013, girls’ sports are no longer protected as female-only. In 2017, self-ID comes to driver’s licenses. By 2021, it reaches women’s prisons. I’ve watched many of the hearings & the pattern is always the same. Every bill is “minor.” Just “codifying.” Just “clarifying.” Just “aligning statutes.” Opponents are dismissed as confused or hysterical. “This won’t let boys into girls’ bathrooms. You’re overreacting.” Then the bill passes and that is exactly what it does. Nothing is different with SB 934. All the committee members (even the R’s) seem sold on the idea the SB 934 merely changes the statute of limitations, nothing more. But anyone with a working brain can read the text of SB 934 (it’s not long) and compare it to the existing CA law on conversion therapy. Under existing law, SB 1172, enforcement of conversion therapy is limited to licensing boards and deals only with “sexual orientation.” However, SB 934 explicitly allows a plaintiff to bring a civil action (lawsuit) for “gender identity change efforts” and recover damages. That is a massive expansion of liability. And even if this were “just” a statute of limitations bill, that should raise a different question: why are we continuing to expand a legal regime in a highly controversial and contested space? But never mind all that. The committee is convinced this is a simple, small bill that increases the statute of limitations. We’ve seen this play out for 25 years. And each time, lawmakers say: this changes nothing or very little. And each time, the law expands far beyond what was promised. SB 934 follows the same script.

Another remarkable clip from Wiener’s SB 934 hearing. Hearing Wiener imagine being a parent is bizarre, but I want to focus on the committee’s inability to understand the bill they are voting on. Few realize California lawmakers have been inserting “gender” nonsense into state law for decades. It starts in 1998, when “gender” is added to the hate crime code. Then it appears in the Education Code, opening the door to boys in girls’ bathrooms. By 2003, “gender identity” enters the Government Code. In 2005, female-only public accommodations are gone. In 2007, the biological definition of sex is stripped from the Education Code. By 2013, girls’ sports are no longer protected as female-only. In 2017, self-ID comes to driver’s licenses. By 2021, it reaches women’s prisons. I’ve watched many of the hearings & the pattern is always the same. Every bill is “minor.” Just “codifying.” Just “clarifying.” Just “aligning statutes.” Opponents are dismissed as confused or hysterical. “This won’t let boys into girls’ bathrooms. You’re overreacting.” Then the bill passes and that is exactly what it does. Nothing is different with SB 934. All the committee members (even the R’s) seem sold on the idea the SB 934 merely changes the statute of limitations, nothing more. But anyone with a working brain can read the text of SB 934 (it’s not long) and compare it to the existing CA law on conversion therapy. Under existing law, SB 1172, enforcement of conversion therapy is limited to licensing boards and deals only with “sexual orientation.” However, SB 934 explicitly allows a plaintiff to bring a civil action (lawsuit) for “gender identity change efforts” and recover damages. That is a massive expansion of liability. And even if this were “just” a statute of limitations bill, that should raise a different question: why are we continuing to expand a legal regime in a highly controversial and contested space? But never mind all that. The committee is convinced this is a simple, small bill that increases the statute of limitations. We’ve seen this play out for 25 years. And each time, lawmakers say: this changes nothing or very little. And each time, the law expands far beyond what was promised. SB 934 follows the same script.

WomenAreReal

25,297 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

⁉️💥WATCH: Ban on conversion practices in Northern Ireland to be debated at Stormont 🎥🎤Chief Reporter James with this report as a demonstration takes place ahead of the debate on legislation aimed at banning conversion practices. 👥Sometimes referred to as “gay cure therapy”, the practices aim to change or suppress someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Alliance Party deputy leader Eóin Tennyson MLA brought forward the Bill, which could see those carrying out the practices jailed for up to two years. DUP Leader Gavin Robinson has described it as “dangerous legislation”. We hear from Alexa Moore from The Rainbow Project.

⁉️💥WATCH: Ban on conversion practices in Northern Ireland to be debated at Stormont 🎥🎤Chief Reporter James with this report as a demonstration takes place ahead of the debate on legislation aimed at banning conversion practices. 👥Sometimes referred to as “gay cure therapy”, the practices aim to change or suppress someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Alliance Party deputy leader Eóin Tennyson MLA brought forward the Bill, which could see those carrying out the practices jailed for up to two years. DUP Leader Gavin Robinson has described it as “dangerous legislation”. We hear from Alexa Moore from The Rainbow Project.

Cool FM News

19,223 просмотров • 8 дней назад

The Irish government wants to pass a law that could see you or your loved ones jailed for possession of memes, cartoons or any content that could be deemed "hateful". The Bill includes no definition of hate and is wide open to abuse by bad actors. Defend free speech – say no to this legislation. Sign the petition: #BinTheBill

The Irish government wants to pass a law that could see you or your loved ones jailed for possession of memes, cartoons or any content that could be deemed "hateful". The Bill includes no definition of hate and is wide open to abuse by bad actors. Defend free speech – say no to this legislation. Sign the petition: #BinTheBill

Free Speech Ireland

19,583,416 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Professor Jiang Xueqin Predicts/Warns That President Trump Is Planning On Running For A Third Term In 2028 And Breaks Down How The Law Could Be Interpreted As This Being A “Legal Move” By The Supreme Court He Goes On To Predict That If The Supreme Court Ruled In Favor OF A 3rd Term, That Obama Would Come Out Of Retirement and Run Head To Head Against Trump Which Is Something #47 Has Always Wanted.

Professor Jiang Xueqin Predicts/Warns That President Trump Is Planning On Running For A Third Term In 2028 And Breaks Down How The Law Could Be Interpreted As This Being A “Legal Move” By The Supreme Court He Goes On To Predict That If The Supreme Court Ruled In Favor OF A 3rd Term, That Obama Would Come Out Of Retirement and Run Head To Head Against Trump Which Is Something #47 Has Always Wanted.

Alex Jones

398,894 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

BREAKING: ARCHBISHOP EAMON MARTIN URGED TO SPEAK OUT ON HATE CRIME BILL (NEW GENDER DEFINITION) Archbishop Eamon Martin is the Primate of All Ireland and President of the Irish Catholic Bishops’ Conference. Martina Burke and Josiah Burke visited Armagh on Saturday to raise the Hate Crime Bill with the Archbishop. The Bill passed the Seanad (Senate) last week and will go before Dáil Éireann for a final vote this Wednesday. The Bill would establish a radical new definition of gender, stating that "gender...includes transgender and a gender other than those of male and female". We asked Archbishop Martin if he would use his position of power and influence to speak out on this issue. Whilst the Archbishop stated that he had spoken in the past on this issue, he acknowledged that he had not spoken on the Hate Crime Bill in recent days. There was no clarity forthcoming from him on whether he would clearly address the issue of this Bill at this critical moment. Whilst he said that there were lay people who were addressing this issue, we would question why the Archbishop himself is not speaking out. In an effort to dismiss public concerns, Minister for Justice Helen McEntee has repeatedly stated that the redefinition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only and will not affect any other legislation. McEntee repeated this during the Seanad sitting last Wednesday. These statements from Helen McEntee are absolute lies. The true intention of the Minister for Justice and the Department of Justice is to substitute the new definition of gender into every piece of legislation on the statute books that involves gender. This was made clear during the Seanad Debate on Wednesday last week when a private Fine Gael email from Helen McEntee to Deputy Richard Bruton was read out by Senator Ronan Mullen. That email was in relation to the new definition of gender in the Hate Crime Bill. The email stated that a review of the Equal Status Act and the Employment Equality Act is taking place and that when that review is finished, the definitions of protected characteristics in the Hate Crime Bill will be reconsidered to ensure consistency in definitions across the Statute Book. In public and to the Houses of the Oireachtas, the Minister is saying that the new definition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only. In private and to her Fine Gael colleagues, she is saying that all definitions of gender across the Statute Book will be rewritten. Such deliberate deceit from one in such a position of responsibility and authority is reprehensible. It calls for the Minister's resignation. It is unbelievable that in response to this deceit, Senator Ronan Mullen was at pains to say that come what may, "I have the greatest of respect and goodwill towards you and your family…and that will continue." We thank God for the recent closure of the Tavistock gender clinic, to which hundreds of vulnerable Irish children had been referred. So-called ‘professionals’ placed these children, many of whom suffered from mental problems, on a pathway to puberty blockers, mutilation and, sadly for many, suicide. This Hate Crime Bill with its new definition of gender would give legitimacy to this poisonous ideology which preys on the most vulnerable and allows for no dissent. This is the eleventh hour. An incredibly dangerous Bill is coming before the Dáil next Wednesday. We are calling on Archbishop Eamon Martin to speak out.

BREAKING: ARCHBISHOP EAMON MARTIN URGED TO SPEAK OUT ON HATE CRIME BILL (NEW GENDER DEFINITION) Archbishop Eamon Martin is the Primate of All Ireland and President of the Irish Catholic Bishops’ Conference. Martina Burke and Josiah Burke visited Armagh on Saturday to raise the Hate Crime Bill with the Archbishop. The Bill passed the Seanad (Senate) last week and will go before Dáil Éireann for a final vote this Wednesday. The Bill would establish a radical new definition of gender, stating that "gender...includes transgender and a gender other than those of male and female". We asked Archbishop Martin if he would use his position of power and influence to speak out on this issue. Whilst the Archbishop stated that he had spoken in the past on this issue, he acknowledged that he had not spoken on the Hate Crime Bill in recent days. There was no clarity forthcoming from him on whether he would clearly address the issue of this Bill at this critical moment. Whilst he said that there were lay people who were addressing this issue, we would question why the Archbishop himself is not speaking out. In an effort to dismiss public concerns, Minister for Justice Helen McEntee has repeatedly stated that the redefinition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only and will not affect any other legislation. McEntee repeated this during the Seanad sitting last Wednesday. These statements from Helen McEntee are absolute lies. The true intention of the Minister for Justice and the Department of Justice is to substitute the new definition of gender into every piece of legislation on the statute books that involves gender. This was made clear during the Seanad Debate on Wednesday last week when a private Fine Gael email from Helen McEntee to Deputy Richard Bruton was read out by Senator Ronan Mullen. That email was in relation to the new definition of gender in the Hate Crime Bill. The email stated that a review of the Equal Status Act and the Employment Equality Act is taking place and that when that review is finished, the definitions of protected characteristics in the Hate Crime Bill will be reconsidered to ensure consistency in definitions across the Statute Book. In public and to the Houses of the Oireachtas, the Minister is saying that the new definition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only. In private and to her Fine Gael colleagues, she is saying that all definitions of gender across the Statute Book will be rewritten. Such deliberate deceit from one in such a position of responsibility and authority is reprehensible. It calls for the Minister's resignation. It is unbelievable that in response to this deceit, Senator Ronan Mullen was at pains to say that come what may, "I have the greatest of respect and goodwill towards you and your family…and that will continue." We thank God for the recent closure of the Tavistock gender clinic, to which hundreds of vulnerable Irish children had been referred. So-called ‘professionals’ placed these children, many of whom suffered from mental problems, on a pathway to puberty blockers, mutilation and, sadly for many, suicide. This Hate Crime Bill with its new definition of gender would give legitimacy to this poisonous ideology which preys on the most vulnerable and allows for no dissent. This is the eleventh hour. An incredibly dangerous Bill is coming before the Dáil next Wednesday. We are calling on Archbishop Eamon Martin to speak out.

Enoch Burke

143,439 просмотров • 1 год назад

This Is Scary... The NGO Bill has passed its 2nd Reading, and Nigerians are not even aware of the ramifications for their rights if it is signed into law. Prof Chidi Odinkalu broke it down perfectly and has raised the alarm; it is now up to Nigerians to resist this bill. This is a total authoritarian system of government that this shambolic Tinubu government intends to impose on Nigerians. #SayNoToNGOBill

This Is Scary... The NGO Bill has passed its 2nd Reading, and Nigerians are not even aware of the ramifications for their rights if it is signed into law. Prof Chidi Odinkalu broke it down perfectly and has raised the alarm; it is now up to Nigerians to resist this bill. This is a total authoritarian system of government that this shambolic Tinubu government intends to impose on Nigerians. #SayNoToNGOBill

Emir Sirdam

12,949 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"We are here, we are queer, and it is time to change the law" Independent MP Alex Greenwich has introduced his LGBTQIA+ Equality Bill into NSW Parliament this morning, which he claims will be the state's most comprehensive reform of its kind in history | #nswpol @AlexGreenwich The Bill would make gay conversion practices illegal in NSW and ban discrimination practices against LGBTQIA+ teachers and students at private schools. "At the heart of the Equality Legislation Amendment: LGBTQIA+ Bill and the Conversion Practices Prohibition Bill is the truth that LGBTQIA+ people exist, are struggling, should be recognised and protected by law and allowed to thrive," Greenwich said. "It is emotionally destructive to be told that you are bad, sinful, to blame for who you are and that you need to change something intrinsic about yourself."

"We are here, we are queer, and it is time to change the law" Independent MP Alex Greenwich has introduced his LGBTQIA+ Equality Bill into NSW Parliament this morning, which he claims will be the state's most comprehensive reform of its kind in history | #nswpol @AlexGreenwich The Bill would make gay conversion practices illegal in NSW and ban discrimination practices against LGBTQIA+ teachers and students at private schools. "At the heart of the Equality Legislation Amendment: LGBTQIA+ Bill and the Conversion Practices Prohibition Bill is the truth that LGBTQIA+ people exist, are struggling, should be recognised and protected by law and allowed to thrive," Greenwich said. "It is emotionally destructive to be told that you are bad, sinful, to blame for who you are and that you need to change something intrinsic about yourself."

10 News Sydney

14,671 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Striking moment in today’s debate: when asked about Royal College of Psychiatrists’s opposition to the bill, the sponsor reassures colleagues the college was neutral. We hear MPs across the chamber object — “No!” — but she maintains, “Yes they do.” If we can't even agree on the facts of a statement that says "the College has concluded that it cannot support the Bill in its current form" - how are we meant to have an honest debate? This is not Parliament at its best.

Striking moment in today’s debate: when asked about Royal College of Psychiatrists’s opposition to the bill, the sponsor reassures colleagues the college was neutral. We hear MPs across the chamber object — “No!” — but she maintains, “Yes they do.” If we can't even agree on the facts of a statement that says "the College has concluded that it cannot support the Bill in its current form" - how are we meant to have an honest debate? This is not Parliament at its best.

Chelsea Roff

51,776 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Constitutional Court is set to hear a landmark case on the 25th of September that could change how rape is prosecuted in South Africa. Under the current law, survivors are forced to prove they did not consent, which is something critics say is deeply unjust and traumatising. #eNCA #DStv403 #QuestionThinkAct

The Constitutional Court is set to hear a landmark case on the 25th of September that could change how rape is prosecuted in South Africa. Under the current law, survivors are forced to prove they did not consent, which is something critics say is deeply unjust and traumatising. #eNCA #DStv403 #QuestionThinkAct

eNCA

36,068 просмотров • 1 год назад

When the Government says it is banning something to ‘protect’ people, more often than not it is not about safety but about clamping down on free speech. FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was on Talk to discuss the Government’s new draft Bill to ban conversion practices and the chilling effect it could have on free speech — particularly on conversations between parents and gender-confused children. You can easily imagine a situation in which a vulnerable child, having been radicalised into believing their parents are evil for not affirming their gender identity, reports them to the police. Even the threat of being reported could deter parents from having well-intentioned conversations with their children for fear of prosecution. Under the draft Bill, they could face a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Watch Connie’s interview below and sign the FSU’s petition 👇

When the Government says it is banning something to ‘protect’ people, more often than not it is not about safety but about clamping down on free speech. FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was on Talk to discuss the Government’s new draft Bill to ban conversion practices and the chilling effect it could have on free speech — particularly on conversations between parents and gender-confused children. You can easily imagine a situation in which a vulnerable child, having been radicalised into believing their parents are evil for not affirming their gender identity, reports them to the police. Even the threat of being reported could deter parents from having well-intentioned conversations with their children for fear of prosecution. Under the draft Bill, they could face a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Watch Connie’s interview below and sign the FSU’s petition 👇

The Free Speech Union

12,471 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Karnatka's Hate Speech Bill: Congress government in Karnataka has tabled a bill that claims to curb hate speech, but it attempts to risk free speech! The wording of the bill is vague and open to interpretation, which means even ordinary statements could be judged as ill will and lead to serious criminal action. India already has laws to deal with hate speech, and even the Supreme Court has said that the real problem is weak enforcement, not the absence of law. When the line between free speech and crime becomes unclear, people begin to self censor out of fear rather than responsibility!

Praffulgarg

11,269 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration

Wall Street Apes

473,455 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Zimbabwean Parliament has adjourned until Tuesday, when debate on the controversial Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 will continue. Monday is not a sitting day. The Bill seeks to make significant changes to Zimbabwe’s Constitution and is expected to remain the focus of parliamentary business when proceedings resume. So far, during the debates, not a single ZANUPF Member of Parliament has opposed the Bill. Sadly, some "opposition" Members of Parliament have spoken in support of it. Parliamentarians are now speculating that the Bill could be put to a vote by Thursday or Friday. There is also concern within ZANUPF about the Senate, where speculation persists that the party’s numbers are not yet fully assured. Find the full debate from today below 👇🏿

The Zimbabwean Parliament has adjourned until Tuesday, when debate on the controversial Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 will continue. Monday is not a sitting day. The Bill seeks to make significant changes to Zimbabwe’s Constitution and is expected to remain the focus of parliamentary business when proceedings resume. So far, during the debates, not a single ZANUPF Member of Parliament has opposed the Bill. Sadly, some "opposition" Members of Parliament have spoken in support of it. Parliamentarians are now speculating that the Bill could be put to a vote by Thursday or Friday. There is also concern within ZANUPF about the Senate, where speculation persists that the party’s numbers are not yet fully assured. Find the full debate from today below 👇🏿

Hopewell Chin’ono

36,546 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Does anybody know what Kemi Badenoch actually means? Because I don't think even she knows what she means 🤷‍♂️ KB, "You cannot change your sex, you can change your legal sex" Ed Balls, "So you are saying you are happy with people changing their legal sex?" KB, "Yes" EB, "You want to change the law to be clear that someone can change their legal sex" KB, "When we do this we will be able to distinguish between sex and gender" EB, "I assumed you were going to legislate that people cannot change their sex at birth, but you're telling us that you're going to change the law so somebody can change their legal sex" KB, "No no no I'm sorry Ed no that's not what I said" EB, "That's what you just said" KB, "We're clarifying the law to saw that the Equality Act when it refers to sex refers to biological sex.. The gender recognition.. We need to move away from the term legal sex and talk about gender" EB, "You used that term, not me" KB, "Yes yes because that is what the law is now. I'm talking about what the law is and how we're trying to clarify it and make it clearer for the future"

Does anybody know what Kemi Badenoch actually means? Because I don't think even she knows what she means 🤷‍♂️ KB, "You cannot change your sex, you can change your legal sex" Ed Balls, "So you are saying you are happy with people changing their legal sex?" KB, "Yes" EB, "You want to change the law to be clear that someone can change their legal sex" KB, "When we do this we will be able to distinguish between sex and gender" EB, "I assumed you were going to legislate that people cannot change their sex at birth, but you're telling us that you're going to change the law so somebody can change their legal sex" KB, "No no no I'm sorry Ed no that's not what I said" EB, "That's what you just said" KB, "We're clarifying the law to saw that the Equality Act when it refers to sex refers to biological sex.. The gender recognition.. We need to move away from the term legal sex and talk about gender" EB, "You used that term, not me" KB, "Yes yes because that is what the law is now. I'm talking about what the law is and how we're trying to clarify it and make it clearer for the future"

Farrukh

930,199 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

I have listened to the debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 between legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge and political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo today on Twitter. Without any doubt, Dr Justice Mavedzenge explained, clarified, and made ordinary people understand the issues, and more importantly, in my humble view, he won the debate on whether there is need for Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 to be subjected to a referendum or not. Anything done for the people, as Prof Jonathan Moyo says these monumental amendments are, should be subjected to the people. The Constitution is not ambiguous on this. It is clear that term limits should be subjected to a referendum for any change to be done legally. Under Section 328 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, any amendment that seeks to extend the length of time a President may hold office, or to remove or alter term limits in a way that benefits an incumbent, cannot apply to the sitting President and must be subjected to constitutional safeguards. You cannot claim to be doing something for the people and yet deny those same people the right to have a say. Prof Jonathan Moyo has a right to his views, but those views must be subjected to the law for the amendments to be implemented legally, and based on what I have read in our Constitution, his views are not aligned with the law. And I am not making this up. It is in the Constitution. Even veteran Zimbabwean lawyer and former ZANUPF legal secretary, Patrick Chinamasa, has said so. In this video, he explains in front of President Mnangagwa that what they are attempting to do today, which Prof Jonathan Moyo argues does not require a referendum, would in fact require two referendums. One to remove or alter presidential term limits from five to seven years, and another to extend the sitting president’s tenure to 2030. This position was declared, and not contradicted, at a ZANUPF conference in Bulawayo. What the broader legal fraternity in Zimbabwe is saying, save for a few lawyers who have since revised their positions and now echo the same view, is that the Constitution is explicit on these prescripts. Anything else is political propaganda to win hearts and minds. The problem with propaganda is that it cannot be anchored in constitutional provisions. It rests on opinion. In this instance, however, we are not expressing opinions. We are stating what is contained in the Constitution and what ZANUPF itself has previously acknowledged. You can decide today that you want a 20-year presidential term. That is your right to hold that view, but you must subject that proposition to the law. If you believe in it, take it to the citizens in the manner prescribed by the Constitution. You cannot decide, through opinion or political argument, whether a referendum is required or not. That question is not settled by what anyone thinks. It is settled by what the law says. If the Constitution requires a referendum, then you must subject yourself to it. That is how constitutional democracy works. We know that the judiciary in Zimbabwe is captured. We know how they are going to rule, but the whole world knows the truth, that if they rule in favour of these amendments going ahead without a referendum, they are simply a captured judiciary without the respect that is required for anyone holding such an important office, and history will remember them as such.

Hopewell Chin’ono

62,458 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Labor and the Greens have once again vowed to block my Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 because they’re more interested in pushing radical gender ideology than standing up for truth and common sense. This bill fixes the mess they created by inserting "gender identity" into the Sex Discrimination Act. That change has undermined women’s rights, confused our laws, and opened the door to activist-driven policies in schools, workplaces and government departments. My bill removes "gender identity" as a protected category and restores the biological reality of male and female back into the law, where it should be. You can’t change your sex. You are either male or female. That’s determined by your DNA, not by your feelings. This debate matters. We’re seeing the damage done to children, the unfairness in women’s sport, and the silencing of anyone who speaks out. Australians are fed up. I won’t back down and I won’t stop telling the truth.

Labor and the Greens have once again vowed to block my Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 because they’re more interested in pushing radical gender ideology than standing up for truth and common sense. This bill fixes the mess they created by inserting "gender identity" into the Sex Discrimination Act. That change has undermined women’s rights, confused our laws, and opened the door to activist-driven policies in schools, workplaces and government departments. My bill removes "gender identity" as a protected category and restores the biological reality of male and female back into the law, where it should be. You can’t change your sex. You are either male or female. That’s determined by your DNA, not by your feelings. This debate matters. We’re seeing the damage done to children, the unfairness in women’s sport, and the silencing of anyone who speaks out. Australians are fed up. I won’t back down and I won’t stop telling the truth.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

16,544 просмотров • 1 год назад

NEWSNATION: Are you worried that the war in Iran and its economic fallout could hurt Republicans in the fall as you see how deeply unpopular this war has been? RNC CHAIR JOE GRUTERS: No. The message has to be delivered that we don't know everything the president knows. He's doing what's right. Some temporary pain for long term gain. It's a wash.

NEWSNATION: Are you worried that the war in Iran and its economic fallout could hurt Republicans in the fall as you see how deeply unpopular this war has been? RNC CHAIR JOE GRUTERS: No. The message has to be delivered that we don't know everything the president knows. He's doing what's right. Some temporary pain for long term gain. It's a wash.

Aaron Rupar

61,233 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A shameful guillotining of consideration and debate of amendments to the ‘Hate Crimes’ legislation took place last Wednesday night in the Seanad. The Bill goes back to the Dáil now. So we had no Report Stage for the Minister to explain her thinking; no explanation for the new, dangerous definition of ‘gender’ other than that it is inclusive; even a claim by the Minister not to understand my position on the issue. Let’s spell it out one more time. The Bill comes up with a new definition of ‘gender’ that conflates the issues of ‘gender’, as always understood, and ‘gender identity’. The timelessly understood idea of the gender binary, i.e. male and female, is displaced by a new, fluid and unscientific gender spectrum notion. This conflation is totally unnecessary for the protection of any individual or class of person. The Bill could simply have listed both ‘gender’ and ‘gender identity or expression’ as separate protected characteristics, (as was done for example in the 2017 Victims of Crime Act). But the Minister would not do this. No adequate reason was ever offered for the new definition other than that it was 'futureproofing' (Simon Harris) and ‘inclusive’ (Helen McEntee). The new definition will have an immediate contagion effect across all criminal legislation aligned or altered by the ‘Hate Crimes’ Bill. The same politicians who foisted this on us will (if returned at the election) continue to seek to harness all laws built around the ordinary meaning of ‘gender’ (as in male or female) and apply these instead to an indefinite range of gender identities. The new definition will give new cover to those promoting gender ideology to young people—especially in new school curricula. It will give ideological support to the invasion by certain men of womens’ spaces and sports. It will provide cover for dangerous HSE approaches to gender dysphoria. It will be used to shore up the unpopular Athena Swan charters imposed by the HEA on third level academics. It will lead to a dismantling of the Equality Acts. Men can be women, and you simply have to suck it up. This Government sought to erase women and the concept of ‘mother’ from the Constitution earlier this year as part of the same fringe ideology. The People, by a large majority, stopped them. The Government refused to learn and doubled down on its woke policy. Your TDs could actually block this Bill in the coming days—if they were willing to defh the party whip. So please let them know what you think. I told the Minister on Wednesday that she will not deserve the votes of any parents of schoolgoing children if she maintains this corrupt definition of ‘gender’ in this legislation. Politicians who will not stand up for sex/gender really do not deserve to be returned. They are enablers of harmful practices. The voters will have an opportunity to choose new representatives soon for the next Dail. They should punish irresponsible TDs and choose more wisely next time. Look for good quality Independents and sympathetic small parties, and Members of the larger parties only if they vocally and clearly defy their political masters. We urgently need change.

A shameful guillotining of consideration and debate of amendments to the ‘Hate Crimes’ legislation took place last Wednesday night in the Seanad. The Bill goes back to the Dáil now. So we had no Report Stage for the Minister to explain her thinking; no explanation for the new, dangerous definition of ‘gender’ other than that it is inclusive; even a claim by the Minister not to understand my position on the issue. Let’s spell it out one more time. The Bill comes up with a new definition of ‘gender’ that conflates the issues of ‘gender’, as always understood, and ‘gender identity’. The timelessly understood idea of the gender binary, i.e. male and female, is displaced by a new, fluid and unscientific gender spectrum notion. This conflation is totally unnecessary for the protection of any individual or class of person. The Bill could simply have listed both ‘gender’ and ‘gender identity or expression’ as separate protected characteristics, (as was done for example in the 2017 Victims of Crime Act). But the Minister would not do this. No adequate reason was ever offered for the new definition other than that it was 'futureproofing' (Simon Harris) and ‘inclusive’ (Helen McEntee). The new definition will have an immediate contagion effect across all criminal legislation aligned or altered by the ‘Hate Crimes’ Bill. The same politicians who foisted this on us will (if returned at the election) continue to seek to harness all laws built around the ordinary meaning of ‘gender’ (as in male or female) and apply these instead to an indefinite range of gender identities. The new definition will give new cover to those promoting gender ideology to young people—especially in new school curricula. It will give ideological support to the invasion by certain men of womens’ spaces and sports. It will provide cover for dangerous HSE approaches to gender dysphoria. It will be used to shore up the unpopular Athena Swan charters imposed by the HEA on third level academics. It will lead to a dismantling of the Equality Acts. Men can be women, and you simply have to suck it up. This Government sought to erase women and the concept of ‘mother’ from the Constitution earlier this year as part of the same fringe ideology. The People, by a large majority, stopped them. The Government refused to learn and doubled down on its woke policy. Your TDs could actually block this Bill in the coming days—if they were willing to defh the party whip. So please let them know what you think. I told the Minister on Wednesday that she will not deserve the votes of any parents of schoolgoing children if she maintains this corrupt definition of ‘gender’ in this legislation. Politicians who will not stand up for sex/gender really do not deserve to be returned. They are enablers of harmful practices. The voters will have an opportunity to choose new representatives soon for the next Dail. They should punish irresponsible TDs and choose more wisely next time. Look for good quality Independents and sympathetic small parties, and Members of the larger parties only if they vocally and clearly defy their political masters. We urgently need change.

Senator Rónán Mullen

46,113 просмотров • 1 год назад

JUST IN 🚨 The Senate is getting ready to pass a Crypto Bill that could give Iran a loophole into subverting the powerful & effective economic warfare that the US is waging against them. The Clarity Act is making its rounds & is in the final stages but has some serious loopholes that need to be addressed so rouge states like Iran are not able to continue funding terror networks around the world. This is something that we need to raise more awareness for.

JUST IN 🚨 The Senate is getting ready to pass a Crypto Bill that could give Iran a loophole into subverting the powerful & effective economic warfare that the US is waging against them. The Clarity Act is making its rounds & is in the final stages but has some serious loopholes that need to be addressed so rouge states like Iran are not able to continue funding terror networks around the world. This is something that we need to raise more awareness for.

Melissa Tate

25,279 просмотров • 1 месяц назад