Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

During the Sey/Partridge debate, it became clear quite immediately that Sey didn’t actually have an argument, he just tried to disprove what Dale said. The problem with this is that the debate was over by the time Dale finished his opening. He brought several interpretations, gave them appropriate weight,... compared historical and criminal data, the writings of Christian forefathers, and synthesized it into a compelling argument that’s more than enough to continue on believing what Christians (and even non Christians) have always believed. However, Sey consistently continued to insist that there is only one race—the human race (which is verifiably false) but he had so many caveats and qualifiers and “it depends” that by the end of it his answer was “it’s sinful to even think there are different races if you do it like Dale does.”show more

Reformed Saxon

1,339 subscribers

12,497 просмотров • 15 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“It’s a real category in that there’s only one race. If someone is saying that the Bible says there’s [sic] multiple races, then they’re wrong.” This stunning statement is how Samuel Sey responded (in his debate with Dale Partridge) to the question, “Is it sinful to believe that race is a real category?” And with that, Samuel Sey has condemned every single Christian that ever lived, up until about 80 years ago. It leaves me speechless, but that’s NXR derangement syndrome for you.

“It’s a real category in that there’s only one race. If someone is saying that the Bible says there’s [sic] multiple races, then they’re wrong.” This stunning statement is how Samuel Sey responded (in his debate with Dale Partridge) to the question, “Is it sinful to believe that race is a real category?” And with that, Samuel Sey has condemned every single Christian that ever lived, up until about 80 years ago. It leaves me speechless, but that’s NXR derangement syndrome for you.

Defiant Baptist

30,543 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Seen a lot of stick on here for Paddy Brennan for his ride on Northern Air and I wanted to watch it just to say to the idiots that it’s what you deserve betting on a maiden hurdle hurdle for a horse first run over hurdles. They are almost schooling them and giving them experience on first run over hurdles or trying to get a mark so you’re just thick for betting a horse first time up over hurdles. I watched it anyway and wtf IT IS ACTUALLY SHOCKING Takes a pull on it most of the race and even a pull 2 out and never ever tried to win the race and finished off the race so well you’d have to think what the fuck was Paddy Brennan doing. He made 0 effort to win the race and it was actually obvious from the off what he was doing because he had him held up 10 lengths off the pace with the outsiders. Paddy never intended to win the race from the off

Seen a lot of stick on here for Paddy Brennan for his ride on Northern Air and I wanted to watch it just to say to the idiots that it’s what you deserve betting on a maiden hurdle hurdle for a horse first run over hurdles. They are almost schooling them and giving them experience on first run over hurdles or trying to get a mark so you’re just thick for betting a horse first time up over hurdles. I watched it anyway and wtf IT IS ACTUALLY SHOCKING Takes a pull on it most of the race and even a pull 2 out and never ever tried to win the race and finished off the race so well you’d have to think what the fuck was Paddy Brennan doing. He made 0 effort to win the race and it was actually obvious from the off what he was doing because he had him held up 10 lengths off the pace with the outsiders. Paddy never intended to win the race from the off

Bookies Dream

452,925 просмотров • 2 лет назад

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating

ari 🦄✨

27,061 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

“Courts have stopped the president from defacing the Kennedy Center, but they haven’t stopped him from destroying the Kennedy Center. And the larger fight is over the future of the Kennedy Center. And that fight is surrounding Trump’s plan to close it down for two years and then gut it, and then renovate it, however he sees fit, I’m sure with a lot of gold stuff, right? And that fight is still ongoing.” “And what that means is that after July 4th, there is nothing planned at the Kennedy Center. If you look on the website in the calendar, there’s nothing booked. So, he’s effectively killing the Kennedy Center, even though his name’s not going to be on it, by just not booking anything and not putting anybody in charge of it. And that’s a tragedy for the Kennedy Center. And whatever you thought about the Kennedy Center before, for the next period of time, it’s going to be vacant.” “And that’s Trump’s decision. He would rather kill it out of spite because he didn’t get his way than to let it continue even imperfectly in the way it was operating. That’s very sad for the people who care about the Kennedy Center and the programming that was going on there.”

“Courts have stopped the president from defacing the Kennedy Center, but they haven’t stopped him from destroying the Kennedy Center. And the larger fight is over the future of the Kennedy Center. And that fight is surrounding Trump’s plan to close it down for two years and then gut it, and then renovate it, however he sees fit, I’m sure with a lot of gold stuff, right? And that fight is still ongoing.” “And what that means is that after July 4th, there is nothing planned at the Kennedy Center. If you look on the website in the calendar, there’s nothing booked. So, he’s effectively killing the Kennedy Center, even though his name’s not going to be on it, by just not booking anything and not putting anybody in charge of it. And that’s a tragedy for the Kennedy Center. And whatever you thought about the Kennedy Center before, for the next period of time, it’s going to be vacant.” “And that’s Trump’s decision. He would rather kill it out of spite because he didn’t get his way than to let it continue even imperfectly in the way it was operating. That’s very sad for the people who care about the Kennedy Center and the programming that was going on there.”

Josh Rogin

28,183 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“He once reminded us: ‘We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.’ He was not making a geopolitical argument. He was making a moral one. Today Gaza confronts this Assembly with the same question that apartheid once posed to the world. Does international law apply equally to everyone? If the answer depends on geography... If it depends on alliances... If it depends on military strength… If it depends of race… If it depends on religion… Then it is no longer law. It is power. And its opposite is oppression. Mandela knew war. He understood violence. But he also understood that the systematic erosion of human dignity can never become the price of political expediency”- Redi Tlhabi

“He once reminded us: ‘We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.’ He was not making a geopolitical argument. He was making a moral one. Today Gaza confronts this Assembly with the same question that apartheid once posed to the world. Does international law apply equally to everyone? If the answer depends on geography... If it depends on alliances... If it depends on military strength… If it depends of race… If it depends on religion… Then it is no longer law. It is power. And its opposite is oppression. Mandela knew war. He understood violence. But he also understood that the systematic erosion of human dignity can never become the price of political expediency”- Redi Tlhabi

State of Palestine

110,255 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This lady plays music with colorful language every morning since her neighbor called the cops on her wrongfully. She makes it a point just to wake up early so she won’t miss her neighbor’s walk, she turned it into her own walk of shame so that everyone knows and she won’t let it down. In college there used to be a know it all in class with us, he would always answer first and most of the time he was right. So of course that gave him an ego that he felt like he was smarter than all of us. We were discussing psychology theories and the student professor asked about a specific theory, he of course raised his hand and gave his answer looking all smug like he was so proud of himself until the student professor told him he wasn’t right. He then spent the next few moments debating her only to irritate the class and I raised my hand and gave the correct answer. I was actually surprised I was right. It turns out I was paying attention that day. His demeanor towards me changed. He wasn’t no longer arrogant towards me, it shifted into back handed compliments and a rivalry I never wanted. It culminated when we were given an hour to do a test, it consisted of one question and we were to explain a principle in a theory that was given to us on the paper by the professor. Everyone had a different question, and we knew that. During the test he said what are you doing?! He made sure it was loud enough to catch people’s attention. He claimed I was looking on his paper as to copy his answer and the professor said even if I did it didn’t matter, we didn’t have the same test anyways and that’s why she did it that way. But to wrongfully accuse me of cheating could have gotten me kicked out of class or school. What irritated me the most was that nothing happened to him. I was expecting he would at least get into trouble for it but nope. Why don’t people who do this ever actually get punished? We see this all the time. Anybody who wrongfully accuses anybody of anything should receive the punishment that that carries in my opinion.

This lady plays music with colorful language every morning since her neighbor called the cops on her wrongfully. She makes it a point just to wake up early so she won’t miss her neighbor’s walk, she turned it into her own walk of shame so that everyone knows and she won’t let it down. In college there used to be a know it all in class with us, he would always answer first and most of the time he was right. So of course that gave him an ego that he felt like he was smarter than all of us. We were discussing psychology theories and the student professor asked about a specific theory, he of course raised his hand and gave his answer looking all smug like he was so proud of himself until the student professor told him he wasn’t right. He then spent the next few moments debating her only to irritate the class and I raised my hand and gave the correct answer. I was actually surprised I was right. It turns out I was paying attention that day. His demeanor towards me changed. He wasn’t no longer arrogant towards me, it shifted into back handed compliments and a rivalry I never wanted. It culminated when we were given an hour to do a test, it consisted of one question and we were to explain a principle in a theory that was given to us on the paper by the professor. Everyone had a different question, and we knew that. During the test he said what are you doing?! He made sure it was loud enough to catch people’s attention. He claimed I was looking on his paper as to copy his answer and the professor said even if I did it didn’t matter, we didn’t have the same test anyways and that’s why she did it that way. But to wrongfully accuse me of cheating could have gotten me kicked out of class or school. What irritated me the most was that nothing happened to him. I was expecting he would at least get into trouble for it but nope. Why don’t people who do this ever actually get punished? We see this all the time. Anybody who wrongfully accuses anybody of anything should receive the punishment that that carries in my opinion.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

83,121 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jesse Love says the post-race argument between him and Nick Sanchez was not brought up this week, which is notable given RCR & Big Machine Racing have a very close relationship. "At the end of the day, it's probably as simple as I don't like the way he races or the situations he puts himself and other people in on a week to week basis, and he doesn't care what anybody has to say." Love says it is what it is and he doesn't think there's anything he can say/do to fix it.

Jesse Love says the post-race argument between him and Nick Sanchez was not brought up this week, which is notable given RCR & Big Machine Racing have a very close relationship. "At the end of the day, it's probably as simple as I don't like the way he races or the situations he puts himself and other people in on a week to week basis, and he doesn't care what anybody has to say." Love says it is what it is and he doesn't think there's anything he can say/do to fix it.

Steven Taranto

21,288 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

CNN: You just called the president unwell again. What do you mean by that? Dean: Well, he's aging, aren't we all? I think we can very much notice that he's a different man than he was in his first term. He's slower, he's a little more lethargic. But much more important to me is what he is saying before the world. That meeting with the generals… pulling them out from the theaters to stand before them rambling about how he walks on stairs, what wars he solved, that he doesn't like the design of battleships? Just bizarre comments that meandered. And apparently some of the generals were trying to take notes, and they just abandoned their notes because it was incoherent. I want this president to succeed. But it is clear to me that he is unwell. And I think the people around him have to recognize that and go to him and admit it to him.

CNN: You just called the president unwell again. What do you mean by that? Dean: Well, he's aging, aren't we all? I think we can very much notice that he's a different man than he was in his first term. He's slower, he's a little more lethargic. But much more important to me is what he is saying before the world. That meeting with the generals… pulling them out from the theaters to stand before them rambling about how he walks on stairs, what wars he solved, that he doesn't like the design of battleships? Just bizarre comments that meandered. And apparently some of the generals were trying to take notes, and they just abandoned their notes because it was incoherent. I want this president to succeed. But it is clear to me that he is unwell. And I think the people around him have to recognize that and go to him and admit it to him.

Acyn

1,325,570 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”

Third

53,682 просмотров • 24 дней назад

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it The Problem of Evil — John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity – everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Let’s assume for a minute that God doesn’t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesn’t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; it’s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if He’s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesn’t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? It’s obvious. It’s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things – natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil – for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on God’s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, “Satan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheat”? Remember that, Luke 22? And if I’d had been Peter I’d have said, “Well, you told him no, right?” Jesus said, “Actually, I told him yes, have at him.” What? “So that when you’re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.” There’s a remedial purpose in this. “As you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, you’re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.”It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, “There was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.” A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I don’t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think that’s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didn’t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, “to keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.” If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. He’s in control of all of that, of all of it.

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it The Problem of Evil — John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity – everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Let’s assume for a minute that God doesn’t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesn’t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; it’s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if He’s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesn’t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? It’s obvious. It’s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things – natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil – for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on God’s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, “Satan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheat”? Remember that, Luke 22? And if I’d had been Peter I’d have said, “Well, you told him no, right?” Jesus said, “Actually, I told him yes, have at him.” What? “So that when you’re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.” There’s a remedial purpose in this. “As you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, you’re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.”It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, “There was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.” A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I don’t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think that’s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didn’t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, “to keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.” If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. He’s in control of all of that, of all of it.

Terri Green

16,839 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Scottie Scheffler says they didn’t find his ball on 17 and he actually asked people to stop searching for it: “The rules official said it landed just barely left of the grandstand thing. I don't know what you call that, like a sponsor area or something. And Teddy had a beat right on where it was coming down. So when we get up there, it's past the fence that marks the TIO, so he said anything that's in there is it part of the TIO. So then we said -- we tried to figure it out. I said, if I find it, does that help me; can I drop it -- since that would be about 50 yards closer to the hole. He said, yes, you can then use that spot, but you might have to go to the other side of the TIO, which I didn't know exactly where that would be, and that's not a great angle coming across there. “So decided to stop the search and go back and drop it doing point-of-entry TIO relief. Actually I did that once this year during the Byron as well. Not something I'm proud of but I was familiar with.” He went on to say: “I stopped them. They had guys pointing from up there, like it landed right here, and I just kind of hauled up there, and I was like, guys, get out of there, stop, do not find the ball. Fortunately it was my security guy that I've had for a few years here. His name is Brucey. And then Woody was up there as well. So both those guys are pretty -- I know them quite well, so when I said, please don't look for the ball, they got out of there.” The Open

Scottie Scheffler says they didn’t find his ball on 17 and he actually asked people to stop searching for it: “The rules official said it landed just barely left of the grandstand thing. I don't know what you call that, like a sponsor area or something. And Teddy had a beat right on where it was coming down. So when we get up there, it's past the fence that marks the TIO, so he said anything that's in there is it part of the TIO. So then we said -- we tried to figure it out. I said, if I find it, does that help me; can I drop it -- since that would be about 50 yards closer to the hole. He said, yes, you can then use that spot, but you might have to go to the other side of the TIO, which I didn't know exactly where that would be, and that's not a great angle coming across there. “So decided to stop the search and go back and drop it doing point-of-entry TIO relief. Actually I did that once this year during the Byron as well. Not something I'm proud of but I was familiar with.” He went on to say: “I stopped them. They had guys pointing from up there, like it landed right here, and I just kind of hauled up there, and I was like, guys, get out of there, stop, do not find the ball. Fortunately it was my security guy that I've had for a few years here. His name is Brucey. And then Woody was up there as well. So both those guys are pretty -- I know them quite well, so when I said, please don't look for the ball, they got out of there.” The Open

Flushing It

1,780,483 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The CEO of OpenAI was asked for his hottest take. His answer wasn't a prediction about a product. It was that the whole world is sleeping through the most important thing happening to it. A student asked Altman for his spiciest take. He paused. He admitted he could probably find a spicier one with more time. Then he landed somewhere quiet. AI is just going to keep going. That sounds obvious until you hear how he framed it. He said this is not widely believed yet. And if it were actually believed, there would be far more reverberations through society right now than there are. That is the whole point. He is not saying people doubt AI is useful. He is saying people have not internalized what continuing on this curve actually means. They nod along and then go back to their day. Then he gave the timeframe. It has been three and a half years since ChatGPT. He said if you run another three and a half years on the same trajectory, what society is capable of is completely different. Not improved. Different. The scariest takes are usually loud. This one was Altman calmly saying the biggest change in human history is already underway, and almost nobody is acting like it. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)

The CEO of OpenAI was asked for his hottest take. His answer wasn't a prediction about a product. It was that the whole world is sleeping through the most important thing happening to it. A student asked Altman for his spiciest take. He paused. He admitted he could probably find a spicier one with more time. Then he landed somewhere quiet. AI is just going to keep going. That sounds obvious until you hear how he framed it. He said this is not widely believed yet. And if it were actually believed, there would be far more reverberations through society right now than there are. That is the whole point. He is not saying people doubt AI is useful. He is saying people have not internalized what continuing on this curve actually means. They nod along and then go back to their day. Then he gave the timeframe. It has been three and a half years since ChatGPT. He said if you run another three and a half years on the same trajectory, what society is capable of is completely different. Not improved. Different. The scariest takes are usually loud. This one was Altman calmly saying the biggest change in human history is already underway, and almost nobody is acting like it. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)

Ihtesham Ali

15,747 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Martin Eberhard is by far the worst person Elon Musk has ever worked with in his entire career. “He is literally the worst person I've ever worked with. And I've worked with some real douchebags. His version of the story is that out of the blue, he pitched me on funding his electric car company, and he convinced me to do it. Totally false. There was an audit of the production cost of the Roadster by one of the investors who joined in 2007. He called me up and said, 'Hey, the numbers that Martin is telling you that everyone's telling you about the Roadster are totally false.' And I was like, 'What do you mean?' He said, 'No, we just didn't order it. They're it's more than twice what he's saying.' Like we would have to sell this car for a quarter million dollars. And then we obviously had to fire Eberhard. And then it turned out he not only had misled me directly, he'd instructed others to lie.”

Martin Eberhard is by far the worst person Elon Musk has ever worked with in his entire career. “He is literally the worst person I've ever worked with. And I've worked with some real douchebags. His version of the story is that out of the blue, he pitched me on funding his electric car company, and he convinced me to do it. Totally false. There was an audit of the production cost of the Roadster by one of the investors who joined in 2007. He called me up and said, 'Hey, the numbers that Martin is telling you that everyone's telling you about the Roadster are totally false.' And I was like, 'What do you mean?' He said, 'No, we just didn't order it. They're it's more than twice what he's saying.' Like we would have to sell this car for a quarter million dollars. And then we obviously had to fire Eberhard. And then it turned out he not only had misled me directly, he'd instructed others to lie.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

427,637 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

General Sibaya couldn’t even say it! After he was pressed he had to write it done. When I told you that they go entertain themselves in many various places “The Hockey Club” you guys said it doesn’t exist. He just told you of “The After 9 Club and you just choose to ignore that part. 🤷🏾‍♀️ What is more alarming is the details in between that are not said. The truth is those that know it know it. It’s so unfortunate that there is so much abuse that happens in those spaces, hence his embarrassment. He is ashamed that he knows such. It’s just so disgusting 🤢.

General Sibaya couldn’t even say it! After he was pressed he had to write it done. When I told you that they go entertain themselves in many various places “The Hockey Club” you guys said it doesn’t exist. He just told you of “The After 9 Club and you just choose to ignore that part. 🤷🏾‍♀️ What is more alarming is the details in between that are not said. The truth is those that know it know it. It’s so unfortunate that there is so much abuse that happens in those spaces, hence his embarrassment. He is ashamed that he knows such. It’s just so disgusting 🤢.

Jackie Phamotse

95,065 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Vice President Harris: Momentum in this race is shifting and there are signs that Donald Trump is feeling it. He won't debate, but he and his running mate sure seem to have a lot to say about me. And by the way, don't you find some of their stuff to just be plain weird?

Vice President Harris: Momentum in this race is shifting and there are signs that Donald Trump is feeling it. He won't debate, but he and his running mate sure seem to have a lot to say about me. And by the way, don't you find some of their stuff to just be plain weird?

Headquarters

306,315 просмотров • 2 лет назад