Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

During the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda-affiliated hijackers flew two Boeing 767 jets which weighed around a quarter million pounds each at 430mph+, one into each of the Twin Towers; between 16,400 and 18,000 people were in the Twin Towers when they were struck. The fires from...

prolificinvent's profile picture

Ryan Buikema

5,087 subscribers

119,806 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Trend Tracker
Trend Tracker1 год назад

Some of the Happy and Sad Moments from History ~ A Thread🧵 Historical Moments 1. Diddy and Kate Moss

Фото профиля Ryan Buikema
Ryan Buikema1 год назад

“It's the nature of the world that most people have moved on, but the people directly involved with 9/11, for them, twice a day it's 9/11.” - Robert Reeg, former FDNY firefighter

Фото профиля Pam Couch
Pam Couch1 год назад

@itswpceo And they just happened to find the terrorists ID’s after the fires? BWA ha ha

Фото профиля Ryan Buikema
Ryan Buikema1 год назад

Yes there were aircraft parts, human bodies, as well as papers and such for blocks considering the windy conditions 700-1000 ft up after the initial explosion scattered debris for thousands of feet. According to testimony by Susan Ginsberg, a staff member of the National Commission on Terrorist attacks upon the United States, in the January 26, 2004, Public Hearing: Four of the hijackers' passports have survived in whole or in part. Two were recovered from the crash site of United Airlines flight 93 in Pennsylvania. These are the passports of Ziad Jarrah and Saeed al Ghamdi. One belonged to a hijacker on American Airlines flight 11. This is the passport of Satam al Suqami. A passerby picked it up and gave it to a NYPD detective shortly before the World Trade Center towers collapsed. A fourth passport was recovered from luggage that did not make it from a Portland flight to Boston on to the connecting flight which was American Airlines Flight 11. This is the passport of Abdulaziz al-Omari. In addition to these four, some digital copies of the hijackers passports were recovered in post-9/11 operations. Two of the passports that have survived, those of Satam al-Suqami and Abdulaziz al-Omari, were clearly doctored. These passports were manipulated in a fraudulent manner in ways that have been associated with al Qaeda.

Фото профиля Alaskan Squeeze
Alaskan Squeeze1 год назад

My heart goes out to the victims and their families... They still live with this nightmare on a daily basis.. They just want the truth. While some of what you say may be that... You forgot to mention the thermite demolition charges that were planted in the buildings for the months leading up to the attack.. Of which the evidence is daming.

Фото профиля Ryan Buikema
Ryan Buikema1 год назад

I was on the early internet including Newground way before Youtube existed and saw the "thermite" and "nano-thermite" conspiracies materialize within a month of 9/11, along with hundreds of other flavors of what would become "truthers" with a large number of the nutjobs ultimately founding Q conspiracies

Фото профиля Matti Hirvonen ✝️
Matti Hirvonen ✝️1 год назад

@itswpceo Yeah, one keeps telling oneself this is "truth".

Фото профиля Ryan Buikema
Ryan Buikema1 год назад

@itswpceo You just spouting off? Or do you have a video backing up anything you "believe"? I'd like to hear it

Фото профиля Shockadelic
Shockadelic1 год назад

@itswpceo 9/11 second plane Part of wing disappears *before* it hits the tower Angle of plane doesn't change significantly Yes, people saw a "plane", but it was a hologram At this time, a hologram of such scale was experimental and it glitched

Фото профиля Ryan Buikema
Ryan Buikema1 год назад

Nope, that's an artifact from 2001 era shaky handheld consumer camera being used for distance filming as shown in the first video. Not to mention codec errors and compression errors from subsequent analog and digital copying-also very common in 23 year old popular videos. The second video is from another angle from a distance The third video of Flight 11 impacting at 430mph+ was recorded on a more professional camera by 2 brothers who were filming a documentary on the NYFD

Фото профиля BiGbRaVo
BiGbRaVo1 год назад

@itswpceo Controlled explosions to bring the towers down. You can’t convince me otherwise.

Похожие видео

With Trump playing the Reversed Magician card of the Tarot, it is interesting to know that the next card in the Tarot is the High Priestess card. This card depicts ISIS/Semiramis between the twin towers of Jachin and Boaz. These are the twin towers that stood at the doorway of Solomons Temple and stand at the entrance way of every Freemasonic temple today. These twin towers were represented by the Twin Towers of 9/11 which was the date (inverted) of the alleged biblical sacking of both the first and second temples in Jerusalem. Again, this is ans end times death cult. Time to wake up world, they are telling you outright.
2:00

With Trump playing the Reversed Magician card of the Tarot, it is interesting to know that the next card in the Tarot is the High Priestess card. This card depicts ISIS/Semiramis between the twin towers of Jachin and Boaz. These are the twin towers that stood at the doorway of Solomons Temple and stand at the entrance way of every Freemasonic temple today. These twin towers were represented by the Twin Towers of 9/11 which was the date (inverted) of the alleged biblical sacking of both the first and second temples in Jerusalem. Again, this is ans end times death cult. Time to wake up world, they are telling you outright.

Richard Willett

21,312 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

[RG911Team] It’s so obvious now. On 9/11, we didn’t think about it because we were in shock. Now we ask: 1) Why didn’t fire crews or building management know this skyscraper was going to collapse? 2) How did steel building columns get ejected hundreds of meters away during the collapse of this skyscraper? 3) If the falling floors ejected these columns sideways, why is there no stack of floors in the rubble pile? 4) Why didn’t the government test for explosive residue - especially given the Twin Towers were bombed by terrorists in 1993? 5) Why was most of the debris shipped overseas for recycling before investigators could inspect it? 6) Why did John Skilling, chief structural engineer of the Twin Towers, state the buildings were designed to survive airliner impacts? 7) Why did architect Francis De Martini, construction manager for the World Trade Center, say the same thing? Why was he so confident that he stayed in the Towers on 9/11 instead of escaping? 8) Why are people attacked by the media for asking these legitimate questions?
0:39

[RG911Team] It’s so obvious now. On 9/11, we didn’t think about it because we were in shock. Now we ask: 1) Why didn’t fire crews or building management know this skyscraper was going to collapse? 2) How did steel building columns get ejected hundreds of meters away during the collapse of this skyscraper? 3) If the falling floors ejected these columns sideways, why is there no stack of floors in the rubble pile? 4) Why didn’t the government test for explosive residue - especially given the Twin Towers were bombed by terrorists in 1993? 5) Why was most of the debris shipped overseas for recycling before investigators could inspect it? 6) Why did John Skilling, chief structural engineer of the Twin Towers, state the buildings were designed to survive airliner impacts? 7) Why did architect Francis De Martini, construction manager for the World Trade Center, say the same thing? Why was he so confident that he stayed in the Towers on 9/11 instead of escaping? 8) Why are people attacked by the media for asking these legitimate questions?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

214,839 просмотров • 1 год назад

Where did all the people go on 9/11? Over 1100 people seemed to have vanished into thin air... This is a rather tough subject for me to touch on, seeing I’ll be sharing very graphic footage, but we need to revisit the jumpers as well as the people who were never recovered in the rubble of the Twin Towers, post September 11, 2001.
7:27

Where did all the people go on 9/11? Over 1100 people seemed to have vanished into thin air... This is a rather tough subject for me to touch on, seeing I’ll be sharing very graphic footage, but we need to revisit the jumpers as well as the people who were never recovered in the rubble of the Twin Towers, post September 11, 2001.

9/11 Revisited

52,872 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Few understand what Ground Zero looked like in the days and weeks that followed. This footage captures the site on the night of September 11 and in the days immediately following the attacks, as smoke continued to rise from the massive pile of debris. The fires at Ground Zero did not end on September 11. Deep beneath the rubble of the World Trade Center, they continued to burn intensely for nearly 100 days, with hot spots still being detected into December 2001. During that time, firefighters, construction workers, engineers, and recovery crews worked around the clock in hazardous conditions. As smoke and heat continued to emerge from the ruins, they searched for survivors, recovered victims, and undertook the enormous task of clearing the site.
0:41

Few understand what Ground Zero looked like in the days and weeks that followed. This footage captures the site on the night of September 11 and in the days immediately following the attacks, as smoke continued to rise from the massive pile of debris. The fires at Ground Zero did not end on September 11. Deep beneath the rubble of the World Trade Center, they continued to burn intensely for nearly 100 days, with hot spots still being detected into December 2001. During that time, firefighters, construction workers, engineers, and recovery crews worked around the clock in hazardous conditions. As smoke and heat continued to emerge from the ruins, they searched for survivors, recovered victims, and undertook the enormous task of clearing the site.

9/11 Memorial & Museum

27,820 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

[RG911Team] No one has ever explained this about 9/11. If the Twin Towers were in danger of sudden and imminent collapse, why didn’t FDNY anticipate this? Why were crew chiefs conducting normal firefighting operations inside and outside of the buildings as if they were not about to come down on their heads? Why did they send firefighters 70 stories up to handle a fire in a building they could never escape? Why did they get surprised when the South Tower started coming down? These seasoned professionals had dealt with all kinds of high rise fires - as well as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. So why didn’t they expect what happened? Perhaps it’s because they knew the airplane strikes and ensuing office and jet fuel fires could not cause the global collapse of these robust and fire resistant steel-framed skyscrapers. Only pre-planted explosives can do that.
0:56

[RG911Team] No one has ever explained this about 9/11. If the Twin Towers were in danger of sudden and imminent collapse, why didn’t FDNY anticipate this? Why were crew chiefs conducting normal firefighting operations inside and outside of the buildings as if they were not about to come down on their heads? Why did they send firefighters 70 stories up to handle a fire in a building they could never escape? Why did they get surprised when the South Tower started coming down? These seasoned professionals had dealt with all kinds of high rise fires - as well as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. So why didn’t they expect what happened? Perhaps it’s because they knew the airplane strikes and ensuing office and jet fuel fires could not cause the global collapse of these robust and fire resistant steel-framed skyscrapers. Only pre-planted explosives can do that.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,505 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Airplanes did not hit the twin towers. These are steel beams every 14 inches. An airplane basically crumbles, and then the titanium engines and wings fall to the ground. Courtesy of AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM and 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT The Air Force has some very advanced holographic capabilities, and there is a known Air Force plane that was flying above the twin towers, which was in a position to beam a holographic image of an airplane flying into the twin towers. And if you recall, this image goes through the towers as if it's going through butter. It just it just disappears. That's a holographic image. That's not a real airplane. And last but not least, the CIA under George H. W. Bush's direction and Dick Cheney used 240 billion dollars in offshore gold to finance a gold war to destroy the economy of Russia, and that money was laundered on 9/11. Nothing hit any of the computers, but because of 9/11, extraordinary transactions were allowed to clear, and CIA was able to launder 240 billion dollars worth of transactions as part of the event. There was also insurance fraud in that all of the gold and jewels and other things stolen in the vaults were taken out prior to the event, and I don't know if this is true or not. But I have it on good authority that a number of people were warned to stay out of the building, and that a number of prominent people had hotel suites overlooking the the twin towers to observe the event. THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT
2:39

Airplanes did not hit the twin towers. These are steel beams every 14 inches. An airplane basically crumbles, and then the titanium engines and wings fall to the ground. Courtesy of AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM and 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT The Air Force has some very advanced holographic capabilities, and there is a known Air Force plane that was flying above the twin towers, which was in a position to beam a holographic image of an airplane flying into the twin towers. And if you recall, this image goes through the towers as if it's going through butter. It just it just disappears. That's a holographic image. That's not a real airplane. And last but not least, the CIA under George H. W. Bush's direction and Dick Cheney used 240 billion dollars in offshore gold to finance a gold war to destroy the economy of Russia, and that money was laundered on 9/11. Nothing hit any of the computers, but because of 9/11, extraordinary transactions were allowed to clear, and CIA was able to launder 240 billion dollars worth of transactions as part of the event. There was also insurance fraud in that all of the gold and jewels and other things stolen in the vaults were taken out prior to the event, and I don't know if this is true or not. But I have it on good authority that a number of people were warned to stay out of the building, and that a number of prominent people had hotel suites overlooking the the twin towers to observe the event. THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT

AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM

75,614 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Back to the Future movie from 1985 coded with symbolism. Along with what has been said in this video, I want to add that 9/11 was a two becoming one ritual. You see this two becoming one symbolism several times in back to the future, the most obvious being the twin pines mall becoming the lone pine mall. Of course, in real life, the two TWIN TOWERS were replaced by the lone ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER. The idea of two becoming one, especially two twins, is very important to the elite that runs the world.
2:20

Back to the Future movie from 1985 coded with symbolism. Along with what has been said in this video, I want to add that 9/11 was a two becoming one ritual. You see this two becoming one symbolism several times in back to the future, the most obvious being the twin pines mall becoming the lone pine mall. Of course, in real life, the two TWIN TOWERS were replaced by the lone ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER. The idea of two becoming one, especially two twins, is very important to the elite that runs the world.

MAVERICK X

70,673 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

You’re not going to believe this one. Seattle is building these two nearly identical residential towers downtown, and they decided to hang a retired Boeing 747 fuselage right between them. The towers are mostly apartments, but that airplane section is actually going to be used as office and commercial space. Some people are already calling them the twin towers because they look so matching. It’s such a crazy architectural choice. It’s meant to be a tribute to Boeing, since the company was founded right there in Seattle. The fuselage is being used to physically connect the two towers as part of an indoor walkway between them. It really makes you wonder what the design team was thinking when they came up with this idea… and somehow got it approved. Would you want to live in one of the towers?
0:28

You’re not going to believe this one. Seattle is building these two nearly identical residential towers downtown, and they decided to hang a retired Boeing 747 fuselage right between them. The towers are mostly apartments, but that airplane section is actually going to be used as office and commercial space. Some people are already calling them the twin towers because they look so matching. It’s such a crazy architectural choice. It’s meant to be a tribute to Boeing, since the company was founded right there in Seattle. The fuselage is being used to physically connect the two towers as part of an indoor walkway between them. It really makes you wonder what the design team was thinking when they came up with this idea… and somehow got it approved. Would you want to live in one of the towers?

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

93,081 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This morning, the Fort Worth Police Department, the Fort Worth Fire Department, and approximately 50 first responder agencies from as far north as Frisco all the way down to Waco climbed the towers at City Center in Downtown to honor the fallen who gave the ultimate sacrifice on September 11, 2001. A piece of steel from one of the World Trade Centers was present at today’s event. As each first responder finished their climb, they rang a bell in honor of the person they were climbing for. Each first responder climbing today had a lanyard around their neck with the picture and name of a fallen hero from 9/11. #NeverForget #worldtradecenter Fort Worth Fire Department
2:06

This morning, the Fort Worth Police Department, the Fort Worth Fire Department, and approximately 50 first responder agencies from as far north as Frisco all the way down to Waco climbed the towers at City Center in Downtown to honor the fallen who gave the ultimate sacrifice on September 11, 2001. A piece of steel from one of the World Trade Centers was present at today’s event. As each first responder finished their climb, they rang a bell in honor of the person they were climbing for. Each first responder climbing today had a lanyard around their neck with the picture and name of a fallen hero from 9/11. #NeverForget #worldtradecenter Fort Worth Fire Department

Fort Worth Police

18,645 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Candace Owens has gone full 9/11 truther but she picked the most easily debunked theory to jump on, stating that Jews were warned to leave the Twin Towers hours prior to the attacks, insinuating that the Jews were therefore responsible for it. What she doesn't tell you is that the warning given to Odigo employees did not mention the World Trade Center. The very first victim of the 9/11 attackers was Daniel Lewin, an Israeli Jew and hundreds of Jews died in the Twin Towers. The employees who received this message were in the Herzliya, Israel. That's nowhere close to Manhattan. They did not mention this to their employer until after they heard reports of a terrorist attack in the United States on the news, after which they informed the company's management. I've attached the report on the right. 10 seconds of research would tell you this. Let us just assume then that she has "done the research" as she claims and ignored all of this in order to push a narrative.
5:15

Candace Owens has gone full 9/11 truther but she picked the most easily debunked theory to jump on, stating that Jews were warned to leave the Twin Towers hours prior to the attacks, insinuating that the Jews were therefore responsible for it. What she doesn't tell you is that the warning given to Odigo employees did not mention the World Trade Center. The very first victim of the 9/11 attackers was Daniel Lewin, an Israeli Jew and hundreds of Jews died in the Twin Towers. The employees who received this message were in the Herzliya, Israel. That's nowhere close to Manhattan. They did not mention this to their employer until after they heard reports of a terrorist attack in the United States on the news, after which they informed the company's management. I've attached the report on the right. 10 seconds of research would tell you this. Let us just assume then that she has "done the research" as she claims and ignored all of this in order to push a narrative.

Ian Miles Cheong

281,171 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Satellite images of Iran's missile bases, which continue to be subjected to airstrikes - Missile base south of Isfahan. A photo dated March 3 shows traces of strikes around two tunnel entrances. It's unclear whether they collapsed as a result of the strikes. - Missile base in Qazvin. The photo shows destroyed buildings on the surface and two destroyed vehicles. - Missile base north of Kermanshah. All buildings on the surface were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Traces of strikes are also visible on the road, but it's unclear what was the target. - Missile base south of Tabriz. Recently built radar domes and auxiliary buildings were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Numerous craters are also visible along the roads. - Missile base in Dezful. Buildings on the surface were destroyed as a result of strikes. - Missile base in Bid Kaneh. The tunnel entrances were subjected to strikes with anti-bunker munitions. The checkpoint and auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Scattered craters indicate strikes on launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base north of Isfahan. The destruction of launchers, likely leaving the underground part of the base, continues. The photo shows traces of fuel spills from at least two destroyed launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base in Khorramabad, which was subjected to repeated strikes. This time, it seems that the tunnel entrances were the target. It's unclear whether anti-bunker munitions were used, but after the repeated strikes, the entrances suffered serious damage. Traces of a strike on one launcher were also found. - Missile base in Yazd. The targets of the strikes were the tunnel entrances. Auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Craters along the road indicate attempts to strike the launchers, but it's hard to say whether they were successful. - Missile base in Lorestan. Traces of strikes on the tunnels are visible, and most of the auxiliary buildings were destroyed or suffered significant damage. Traces of strikes are visible on the roads - likely in an attempt to hit the launchers.
0:24

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Satellite images of Iran's missile bases, which continue to be subjected to airstrikes - Missile base south of Isfahan. A photo dated March 3 shows traces of strikes around two tunnel entrances. It's unclear whether they collapsed as a result of the strikes. - Missile base in Qazvin. The photo shows destroyed buildings on the surface and two destroyed vehicles. - Missile base north of Kermanshah. All buildings on the surface were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Traces of strikes are also visible on the road, but it's unclear what was the target. - Missile base south of Tabriz. Recently built radar domes and auxiliary buildings were destroyed, and the tunnel entrances were damaged. Numerous craters are also visible along the roads. - Missile base in Dezful. Buildings on the surface were destroyed as a result of strikes. - Missile base in Bid Kaneh. The tunnel entrances were subjected to strikes with anti-bunker munitions. The checkpoint and auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Scattered craters indicate strikes on launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base north of Isfahan. The destruction of launchers, likely leaving the underground part of the base, continues. The photo shows traces of fuel spills from at least two destroyed launchers. - An updated photo of the missile base in Khorramabad, which was subjected to repeated strikes. This time, it seems that the tunnel entrances were the target. It's unclear whether anti-bunker munitions were used, but after the repeated strikes, the entrances suffered serious damage. Traces of a strike on one launcher were also found. - Missile base in Yazd. The targets of the strikes were the tunnel entrances. Auxiliary buildings were destroyed. Craters along the road indicate attempts to strike the launchers, but it's hard to say whether they were successful. - Missile base in Lorestan. Traces of strikes on the tunnels are visible, and most of the auxiliary buildings were destroyed or suffered significant damage. Traces of strikes are visible on the roads - likely in an attempt to hit the launchers.

Lord Bebo

75,808 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,559 просмотров • 1 год назад

2. 9/11 — The Perfect Crisis 🔹 The Twin Towers were engineered to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707. Reinforced steel. Built for worst-case scenarios. Yet two planes brought down three buildings, all collapsing at near free-fall speed. Jet fuel can’t melt steel. Office fires don’t level skyscrapers. The physics didn’t hold. But the narrative did. 🔹 9/11 wasn’t just a terrorist attack. It was a turning point in manufactured consent. In one morning, fear rewrote laws, erased rights, and justified endless war. The real collapse wasn’t just steel and concrete — it was public discernment.
2:01

2. 9/11 — The Perfect Crisis 🔹 The Twin Towers were engineered to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707. Reinforced steel. Built for worst-case scenarios. Yet two planes brought down three buildings, all collapsing at near free-fall speed. Jet fuel can’t melt steel. Office fires don’t level skyscrapers. The physics didn’t hold. But the narrative did. 🔹 9/11 wasn’t just a terrorist attack. It was a turning point in manufactured consent. In one morning, fear rewrote laws, erased rights, and justified endless war. The real collapse wasn’t just steel and concrete — it was public discernment.

MatrixMysteries

109,107 просмотров • 1 год назад

Scott Jennings: “Today, [Zohran Mamdani] had this press conference—I watched a chunk of it. I didn't hear any words for the victims of 9/11 but he found the real victim, his aunt. The victims of 9/11 were in the Twin Towers. This were the victims.” Abby Phillip: “Is the implication here that he has to answer for the terrorist who attacked 9/11?” Scott Jennings: “No, I think if you’re going to run for Mayor of New York City… and you’re going to talk about 9/11 or invoke 9/11. You darn sure better start with the people that died in the Twin Towers… and he didn’t do that. He made it about his experience and his aunt.”
1:57

Scott Jennings: “Today, [Zohran Mamdani] had this press conference—I watched a chunk of it. I didn't hear any words for the victims of 9/11 but he found the real victim, his aunt. The victims of 9/11 were in the Twin Towers. This were the victims.” Abby Phillip: “Is the implication here that he has to answer for the terrorist who attacked 9/11?” Scott Jennings: “No, I think if you’re going to run for Mayor of New York City… and you’re going to talk about 9/11 or invoke 9/11. You darn sure better start with the people that died in the Twin Towers… and he didn’t do that. He made it about his experience and his aunt.”

RedWave Press

522,598 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

The Collapse of the South Tower - September 11, 2000 Courtesy of AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM and 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT Footage of the collapse of the South Tower of the World Trade Center, filmed by David Corporon, captured one of the most devastating moments of the September 11 attacks. After burning for 56 minutes, the South Tower collapsed at 9:59 a.m. in roughly 10 seconds. The force of the collapse registered a 2.1 magnitude seismic reading at Columbia University's observation station 21 miles away. Massive clouds of smoke and debris swept through lower Manhattan, causing widespread destruction and panic. In total, 2,606 people died in and around the towers, including civilians, 343 firefighters, and 71 law enforcement officers. Only 18 people escaped from above the impact zone in the South Tower. The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 a.m., compounding the tragic loss of life and marking one of the deadliest events in modern history.
2:59

The Collapse of the South Tower - September 11, 2000 Courtesy of AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM and 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT Footage of the collapse of the South Tower of the World Trade Center, filmed by David Corporon, captured one of the most devastating moments of the September 11 attacks. After burning for 56 minutes, the South Tower collapsed at 9:59 a.m. in roughly 10 seconds. The force of the collapse registered a 2.1 magnitude seismic reading at Columbia University's observation station 21 miles away. Massive clouds of smoke and debris swept through lower Manhattan, causing widespread destruction and panic. In total, 2,606 people died in and around the towers, including civilians, 343 firefighters, and 71 law enforcement officers. Only 18 people escaped from above the impact zone in the South Tower. The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 a.m., compounding the tragic loss of life and marking one of the deadliest events in modern history.

AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM

12,210 просмотров • 14 дней назад

[RG911Team] The Hidden Ball of Flame: A Shocking 9/11 Revelation Everyone was looking up in horror on September 11, 2001 - and missing something huge. We all saw passenger jets slam into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and create enormous fireballs of ignited jet fuel. We all saw both buildings completely collapse from top to bottom an hour or so later. But something unexpected happened much lower that no one has been able to explain. No video evidence of this unusual phenomenon has ever been broadcast on TV. But over the years, the testimonies of several survivors of 9/11 have revealed a new and disturbing narrative. First, there was renowned CBS journalist Carol Marin (Carol Marin). Hours after surviving the collapse of the Twin Towers, she appeared in a news studio, her coat still caked in dust, as she told of a fireball that sprung from the base of one of the towers as the top of the building began to come apart. She said that by sheer luck, she was able to outrun it before it reached her. A fireball - from the base of the tower? This surprising claim doesn’t align with the official 9/11 story, and could be written off as just one person who misremembered due to her traumatic experience. But then there’s CBS reporter Byron Pitts (Byron Pitts). Late that same afternoon, he stated that he and Mika Brzezinski (yes, that one) were near the South Tower when they also witnessed a giant fireball approaching them as the tower came down, and had to flee the flames immediately. Now we have two news reporters with matching stories. But recently, we found a third eyewitness. On 9/11, paramedic Bonnie Giebfried saved lives of disabled WTC workers trying to escape the buildings as debris - and people - fell around them. In an interview recorded a decade later, Giebfried testified that a massive fireball at ground level approached her as the South Tower collapsed - and almost killed her. And then there was NYPD officer Sam Esposito, who was injured as he tried to rescue people in the World Trade Center. While still wearing his hospital gown, he told reporters that he saw the street next to the towers cave in and a fireball erupt from out of the ground. So, this fireball claim has to be taken seriously. But if there were no fires on the lower floors or basement, how was it possible? How could a giant ball of flame emerge from the base of the building when there was no explosive material in that area? Or was there? That’s what we intend to find out. This September, we are meeting with Bonnie Giebfried and other 9/11 survivors and first responders who believe what really happened on 9/11 has been covered up for 25 years. Join us at the Turning the Tide conference in NYC from Sept 10-13, where these brave whistleblowers will speak alongside scientists, architects, researchers and public figures who are exposing this explosive evidence and demanding justice. Because the truth must be followed, wherever it leads. Learn more at and see the comment below ⬇️
2:21

[RG911Team] The Hidden Ball of Flame: A Shocking 9/11 Revelation Everyone was looking up in horror on September 11, 2001 - and missing something huge. We all saw passenger jets slam into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and create enormous fireballs of ignited jet fuel. We all saw both buildings completely collapse from top to bottom an hour or so later. But something unexpected happened much lower that no one has been able to explain. No video evidence of this unusual phenomenon has ever been broadcast on TV. But over the years, the testimonies of several survivors of 9/11 have revealed a new and disturbing narrative. First, there was renowned CBS journalist Carol Marin (Carol Marin). Hours after surviving the collapse of the Twin Towers, she appeared in a news studio, her coat still caked in dust, as she told of a fireball that sprung from the base of one of the towers as the top of the building began to come apart. She said that by sheer luck, she was able to outrun it before it reached her. A fireball - from the base of the tower? This surprising claim doesn’t align with the official 9/11 story, and could be written off as just one person who misremembered due to her traumatic experience. But then there’s CBS reporter Byron Pitts (Byron Pitts). Late that same afternoon, he stated that he and Mika Brzezinski (yes, that one) were near the South Tower when they also witnessed a giant fireball approaching them as the tower came down, and had to flee the flames immediately. Now we have two news reporters with matching stories. But recently, we found a third eyewitness. On 9/11, paramedic Bonnie Giebfried saved lives of disabled WTC workers trying to escape the buildings as debris - and people - fell around them. In an interview recorded a decade later, Giebfried testified that a massive fireball at ground level approached her as the South Tower collapsed - and almost killed her. And then there was NYPD officer Sam Esposito, who was injured as he tried to rescue people in the World Trade Center. While still wearing his hospital gown, he told reporters that he saw the street next to the towers cave in and a fireball erupt from out of the ground. So, this fireball claim has to be taken seriously. But if there were no fires on the lower floors or basement, how was it possible? How could a giant ball of flame emerge from the base of the building when there was no explosive material in that area? Or was there? That’s what we intend to find out. This September, we are meeting with Bonnie Giebfried and other 9/11 survivors and first responders who believe what really happened on 9/11 has been covered up for 25 years. Join us at the Turning the Tide conference in NYC from Sept 10-13, where these brave whistleblowers will speak alongside scientists, architects, researchers and public figures who are exposing this explosive evidence and demanding justice. Because the truth must be followed, wherever it leads. Learn more at and see the comment below ⬇️

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

21,178 просмотров • 15 дней назад

One of the craziest videos I’ve ever seen on 9/11— Back to the Future Predicts 9/11 I came across this video several years ago and it absolutely blew my mind. Have you seen it? 🔴 Short Summary Breakdown: • In Back to the future Part 1, a group of Mus1im terrorists attacked Marty at the *Twin Pines Mall, exactly at 9:11 mirrored. — twin pines are a symbolic representation of the twin towers. — After the attack, the twin pines are gone, left with a sole pine 🌲 — Doc shows two stop watches, both of which are 119 mirrored 911. — The scene when Marty learns the clock (Tower) was going to be (struck), there was the ‘all seeing eye’ in the background, and after the tower was struck, a giant flaming 9/11 appears on the screen. • In Back to the Future Part 2, the twin pines appear again in Marty’s future house. — the twin pines ACTUALLY morphed into the Real Twin Towers —— the Statue of Liberty can also be seen in the scene. — the upside down man shows his perspective of when the Twin Towers appear to be falling down — the director of B2tF directed another movie in 2015, 30 yrs later, about a man walking across a (wire) connected to the Twin Towers… in B2tF, Marty hides a letter in docs jacket warning him about the terrorist attack, while Doc is connecting the (wire) to the clock tower. When doc finds it, he says “find out in 30 years”.. which would be 2015. Wait until you get to the part about the monolith standing next to the 9/11 site. Talk about a mind-bender…
12:41

One of the craziest videos I’ve ever seen on 9/11— Back to the Future Predicts 9/11 I came across this video several years ago and it absolutely blew my mind. Have you seen it? 🔴 Short Summary Breakdown: • In Back to the future Part 1, a group of Mus1im terrorists attacked Marty at the *Twin Pines Mall, exactly at 9:11 mirrored. — twin pines are a symbolic representation of the twin towers. — After the attack, the twin pines are gone, left with a sole pine 🌲 — Doc shows two stop watches, both of which are 119 mirrored 911. — The scene when Marty learns the clock (Tower) was going to be (struck), there was the ‘all seeing eye’ in the background, and after the tower was struck, a giant flaming 9/11 appears on the screen. • In Back to the Future Part 2, the twin pines appear again in Marty’s future house. — the twin pines ACTUALLY morphed into the Real Twin Towers —— the Statue of Liberty can also be seen in the scene. — the upside down man shows his perspective of when the Twin Towers appear to be falling down — the director of B2tF directed another movie in 2015, 30 yrs later, about a man walking across a (wire) connected to the Twin Towers… in B2tF, Marty hides a letter in docs jacket warning him about the terrorist attack, while Doc is connecting the (wire) to the clock tower. When doc finds it, he says “find out in 30 years”.. which would be 2015. Wait until you get to the part about the monolith standing next to the 9/11 site. Talk about a mind-bender…

MJTruthUltra

139,765 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Tucker Carlson exposes there are 2 independent reports of 9/11 that have been hidden from us They prove 2 things - It was impossible for Building 7 to come down from the office fire - Particles were taken from the World Trade Center collapse, testing proved they were explosives The Twin Towers on September 11th were not brought down by planes, they were brought down by explosives “Why did Building 7 collapse after just seven hours of burning? In a way that no steel frame building anywhere in the world has ever collapsed? Professor Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska at Fairbanks conducted an independent study whose findings were released in 2020. Professor Hulsey found that office fires of the kind in Building 7 and 9/11 could not have produced sufficient thermal expansion to cause the crucial girder to fail. It's impossible, he found. One group of scientists did collect and test four samples of dust debris collected by a Manhattan resident about 10 minutes after the collapse of the second World Trade Center tower. In those samples, the scientists found distinctive red-gray chips full of highly energetic and thermic material. In other words, they found traces of explosive compounds.”
0:52

Tucker Carlson exposes there are 2 independent reports of 9/11 that have been hidden from us They prove 2 things - It was impossible for Building 7 to come down from the office fire - Particles were taken from the World Trade Center collapse, testing proved they were explosives The Twin Towers on September 11th were not brought down by planes, they were brought down by explosives “Why did Building 7 collapse after just seven hours of burning? In a way that no steel frame building anywhere in the world has ever collapsed? Professor Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska at Fairbanks conducted an independent study whose findings were released in 2020. Professor Hulsey found that office fires of the kind in Building 7 and 9/11 could not have produced sufficient thermal expansion to cause the crucial girder to fail. It's impossible, he found. One group of scientists did collect and test four samples of dust debris collected by a Manhattan resident about 10 minutes after the collapse of the second World Trade Center tower. In those samples, the scientists found distinctive red-gray chips full of highly energetic and thermic material. In other words, they found traces of explosive compounds.”

Wall Street Apes

772,896 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Kochi, Keralam: Officials from Edifice Engineering, which has taken up the contract to demolish the structurally weakened flats at Army Towers in Vyttila, Ernakulam, along with representatives of the Africa-based Jet Demolition company, inspected the apartments. The flats were constructed in 2018 by the Army Welfare Housing Organisation. Following concerns over structural weakness, residents filed a petition, after which the High Court ordered the demolition and removal of the flats.
1:02

#WATCH | Kochi, Keralam: Officials from Edifice Engineering, which has taken up the contract to demolish the structurally weakened flats at Army Towers in Vyttila, Ernakulam, along with representatives of the Africa-based Jet Demolition company, inspected the apartments. The flats were constructed in 2018 by the Army Welfare Housing Organisation. Following concerns over structural weakness, residents filed a petition, after which the High Court ordered the demolition and removal of the flats.

ANI

93,204 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад