Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Ed Dowd: "What we're learning from the Epstein files is that it's an operating system...[and] let's not forget Epstein was involved in money laundering... [and now] Bitcoin has been tied to... Epstein, and he's been involved in taking over the network and funding it... If you wanted to set...

SenseReceptor's profile picture

Sense Receptor

79,648 subscribers

21,167 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd: "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust... [and] that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system... [so] gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much." This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), who is also the founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Michael Farris (Michael Farris) posted to YouTube on January 13, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust. I think the big, the moves in gold and silver are really discounting a lack of trust and fear of what is coming and what it's going to look like. And, and also it's also telling you that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system. "And Bitcoin, interestingly enough, has stalled out. It's down 20% since October, the high in October and Bitcoin is barely up today. So, you know, there was always this thesis around Bitcoin that when when there's a new monetary system comes, it's going to, it's going to be protection against, you know, any of that kind of uncertainty. It's increasing. It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much. "And Bitcoin, unfortunately, is very highly correlated to the Nasdaq and it's disconnected from the Nasdaq. The Nasdaq and Bitcoin have disconnected temporarily. Generally speaking, they're highly correlated. So what does that say? Does that say Nasdaq is going to catch up down to Bitcoin or is Bitcoin going to rally back up? I think that the Nasdaq is going to go down to bitcoin. So that's where we are."
1:15

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd: "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust... [and] that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system... [so] gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much." This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), who is also the founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Michael Farris (Michael Farris) posted to YouTube on January 13, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The metals are telling you that there's uncertainty out there and a lack of trust. I think the big, the moves in gold and silver are really discounting a lack of trust and fear of what is coming and what it's going to look like. And, and also it's also telling you that gold and silver are going to be part of the new monetary system. "And Bitcoin, interestingly enough, has stalled out. It's down 20% since October, the high in October and Bitcoin is barely up today. So, you know, there was always this thesis around Bitcoin that when when there's a new monetary system comes, it's going to, it's going to be protection against, you know, any of that kind of uncertainty. It's increasing. It's becoming increasingly obvious to me that gold and silver are the trade and not Bitcoin so much. "And Bitcoin, unfortunately, is very highly correlated to the Nasdaq and it's disconnected from the Nasdaq. The Nasdaq and Bitcoin have disconnected temporarily. Generally speaking, they're highly correlated. So what does that say? Does that say Nasdaq is going to catch up down to Bitcoin or is Bitcoin going to rally back up? I think that the Nasdaq is going to go down to bitcoin. So that's where we are."

Sense Receptor

136,648 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Is... Epstein the father of programmable money? Of course, the answer [is] yes. Although he was an agent for what is described... as the Rothschild Network... [and re:] Bitcoin, [I] have been saying this is a prototype to create CBDC and digital money." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from the Children's Health Defense series Financial Rebellion (Children’s Health Defense) posted to Rumble on March 5, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's a new commentary at Solari called Is Jeffrey Epstein the Father of Programmable Money? Of course, the answer being yes, although he was an agent for what is described, I think very correctly as the— As the Rothschild Network. "So in America, many people say Rothschild. I was brought up, using the European Rothschild, but same network. And, the commentary at Solari points you to a series done by a writer, writing anonymously, anonymously under the name of ESC, ESC, as in Escape, and what our commentary does is it points you to all the posts from January 30th on, and in my opinion, this is the single best, after Whitney Webb, this is the single best description of the Epstein Network and the governance of the Epstein Network. "And the goal of the Epstein Network. If you study what Epstein was doing, he was, in my opinion, laundering money, including money coming out of the United States government. That's not what ESC focuses on. What he's focusing on is how Epstein reinvested that money as the equivalent of venture capitalist and philanthropist, seeding the development of programmable money. And seeding people, both in academia and business, in all aspects of life, building and operating the different pieces you need to prototype and create digital money, including Bitcoin. "So Carolyn and I, since the beginning of Bitcoin, have been saying, this is a prototype to create CBDC and digital money. And, you know, there's a wonderful group of freedom fighters in that community who've been very, I would say very negative towards us is the only way I can describe it. And I just had one of the top luminaries of that whole world write me and say, oh, my God, you were right. Will you be in our documentary? Like, thank you, Houston. We have contact. "Anyway, so ESC has done a marvelous job. I can't recommend it. Just read everything from January 30th on, and he describes how Epstein developed and ran this and sort of built a prototyping. And then, as Whitney Webb has told us, you know, once that all got institutionalized, you don't need Epstein anymore, particularly when you got FASAB 56, which we've talked about many times. "And so, you know, out Epstein goes because now we've institutionalized. And that's why, you know, Whitney will talk about Palantir as part of the now institutional capacity of what, you know, Epstein is a venture capitalist or philanthropist, helped seed and get started. But now it's being institutionalized. "And the important thing to think of is this is like a booster rocket. After the booster rocket gets you to a certain point and you can institutionalize, then you just eject the booster rocket and keep on going. And if you look at the, the, you know, if you look at the investment network, which are basically the equity pool around the central banks. "So I'll just talk about it as the people who control the central banks. Once you've got the central banks ready to implement digital assets and stablecoins as programmable money, you don't need Epstein. You can let it go. "And if you look at the lot of scandal of getting rid of the booster rocket, they're talking about the very lurid parts of Epstein, but they're not talking about the control grid and how to stop it with this exception. And I think this is why this substack series is so exceptional. And if you really want to understand what Epstein was up to, but more importantly what the structure that managed and controlled Epstein, whether it was the intelligence agencies or the investment money in and around the central banks that wants total digital control. "So Epstein was building the control grid, you know, prototyping, distributed ledgers was all part of that. He put a lot of money into mind control because the neuro warfare is a very, very important part of it."
4:38

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Is... Epstein the father of programmable money? Of course, the answer [is] yes. Although he was an agent for what is described... as the Rothschild Network... [and re:] Bitcoin, [I] have been saying this is a prototype to create CBDC and digital money." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from the Children's Health Defense series Financial Rebellion (Children’s Health Defense) posted to Rumble on March 5, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's a new commentary at Solari called Is Jeffrey Epstein the Father of Programmable Money? Of course, the answer being yes, although he was an agent for what is described, I think very correctly as the— As the Rothschild Network. "So in America, many people say Rothschild. I was brought up, using the European Rothschild, but same network. And, the commentary at Solari points you to a series done by a writer, writing anonymously, anonymously under the name of ESC, ESC, as in Escape, and what our commentary does is it points you to all the posts from January 30th on, and in my opinion, this is the single best, after Whitney Webb, this is the single best description of the Epstein Network and the governance of the Epstein Network. "And the goal of the Epstein Network. If you study what Epstein was doing, he was, in my opinion, laundering money, including money coming out of the United States government. That's not what ESC focuses on. What he's focusing on is how Epstein reinvested that money as the equivalent of venture capitalist and philanthropist, seeding the development of programmable money. And seeding people, both in academia and business, in all aspects of life, building and operating the different pieces you need to prototype and create digital money, including Bitcoin. "So Carolyn and I, since the beginning of Bitcoin, have been saying, this is a prototype to create CBDC and digital money. And, you know, there's a wonderful group of freedom fighters in that community who've been very, I would say very negative towards us is the only way I can describe it. And I just had one of the top luminaries of that whole world write me and say, oh, my God, you were right. Will you be in our documentary? Like, thank you, Houston. We have contact. "Anyway, so ESC has done a marvelous job. I can't recommend it. Just read everything from January 30th on, and he describes how Epstein developed and ran this and sort of built a prototyping. And then, as Whitney Webb has told us, you know, once that all got institutionalized, you don't need Epstein anymore, particularly when you got FASAB 56, which we've talked about many times. "And so, you know, out Epstein goes because now we've institutionalized. And that's why, you know, Whitney will talk about Palantir as part of the now institutional capacity of what, you know, Epstein is a venture capitalist or philanthropist, helped seed and get started. But now it's being institutionalized. "And the important thing to think of is this is like a booster rocket. After the booster rocket gets you to a certain point and you can institutionalize, then you just eject the booster rocket and keep on going. And if you look at the, the, you know, if you look at the investment network, which are basically the equity pool around the central banks. "So I'll just talk about it as the people who control the central banks. Once you've got the central banks ready to implement digital assets and stablecoins as programmable money, you don't need Epstein. You can let it go. "And if you look at the lot of scandal of getting rid of the booster rocket, they're talking about the very lurid parts of Epstein, but they're not talking about the control grid and how to stop it with this exception. And I think this is why this substack series is so exceptional. And if you really want to understand what Epstein was up to, but more importantly what the structure that managed and controlled Epstein, whether it was the intelligence agencies or the investment money in and around the central banks that wants total digital control. "So Epstein was building the control grid, you know, prototyping, distributed ledgers was all part of that. He put a lot of money into mind control because the neuro warfare is a very, very important part of it."

Sense Receptor

25,403 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Mike Benz just challenged one of the most widely accepted assumptions about Jeffrey Epstein saga. Mike Benz told Joe Rogan that he’s never been convinced Epstein’s operation was primarily about blackmail. The entire network was a house of cards that would have collapsed the moment people even suspected that’s what was happening. BENZ: “I’ve never been convinced that the central role of the Epstein young girl, in my view, sidebar of of the Epstein money laundering story is, is that it was for blackmail.” “Part of this is because the moment Jeffrey Epstein formally, officially threatens somebody with blackmail, and that person tells his wife, and that wife tells her friends, and that gets out to somebody else that knows Jeffrey Epstein —Jeffrey Epstein’s access goes away overnight.” “That’s the sort of thing that even a rumor of that spreading and nobody else is going to want to do business with them.” ROGAN: “So you think people just assume that it’s blackmail because that is how you would blackmail someone, especially underage girls?” BENZ: “I think it is very possible that there could have been indirect blackmail, meaning Epstein passes it on to an intelligence service to, you know, to a corporate espionage client or something, And they use that for their own purposes.” “But even then, I mean, imagine, for example, if, you know, like on the Bill Gates thing…Bill gates gets an email; I have a video of you sleeping with this person.” “The moment they send that to the press, you know, in order to…they figure they have nothing to lose.” “I mean, there’s not been anybody in the seven years that’s transpired who said I’ve been, I was personally blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein.” “Because the moment you do that, nobody comes to your parties anymore. You lose all the access. You lose all the deal flow. You lose all the goodwill that you’ve generated.”
2:26

Mike Benz just challenged one of the most widely accepted assumptions about Jeffrey Epstein saga. Mike Benz told Joe Rogan that he’s never been convinced Epstein’s operation was primarily about blackmail. The entire network was a house of cards that would have collapsed the moment people even suspected that’s what was happening. BENZ: “I’ve never been convinced that the central role of the Epstein young girl, in my view, sidebar of of the Epstein money laundering story is, is that it was for blackmail.” “Part of this is because the moment Jeffrey Epstein formally, officially threatens somebody with blackmail, and that person tells his wife, and that wife tells her friends, and that gets out to somebody else that knows Jeffrey Epstein —Jeffrey Epstein’s access goes away overnight.” “That’s the sort of thing that even a rumor of that spreading and nobody else is going to want to do business with them.” ROGAN: “So you think people just assume that it’s blackmail because that is how you would blackmail someone, especially underage girls?” BENZ: “I think it is very possible that there could have been indirect blackmail, meaning Epstein passes it on to an intelligence service to, you know, to a corporate espionage client or something, And they use that for their own purposes.” “But even then, I mean, imagine, for example, if, you know, like on the Bill Gates thing…Bill gates gets an email; I have a video of you sleeping with this person.” “The moment they send that to the press, you know, in order to…they figure they have nothing to lose.” “I mean, there’s not been anybody in the seven years that’s transpired who said I’ve been, I was personally blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein.” “Because the moment you do that, nobody comes to your parties anymore. You lose all the access. You lose all the deal flow. You lose all the goodwill that you’ve generated.”

Overton

565,357 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"I was very much like you guys when I was at school. I didn't necessarily know exactly what I wanted to do, though I knew I wanted to be a Formula One driver, but I didn't really know what the pathway was to get into this sport. And when I got here, I was the only person of colour." "You see, it's not been a very diverse sport for a long, long time, and I think it's time that we change that. And so it makes me so happy to see that this whole crowd is so diverse, and that's how the world is. So Formula One needs to start reflecting the outside world." [📹 Mick Akers]
0:30

"I was very much like you guys when I was at school. I didn't necessarily know exactly what I wanted to do, though I knew I wanted to be a Formula One driver, but I didn't really know what the pathway was to get into this sport. And when I got here, I was the only person of colour." "You see, it's not been a very diverse sport for a long, long time, and I think it's time that we change that. And so it makes me so happy to see that this whole crowd is so diverse, and that's how the world is. So Formula One needs to start reflecting the outside world." [📹 Mick Akers]

sim

55,757 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“I'm not a huge hater of the institutions. I wasn't a huge hater of altcoins. These institutional products are just kind of altcoins. People can go make their money. Go do your thing. But it's not Bitcoin. An ETF is not Bitcoin. With these centralized projects, you're not getting the core values of Bitcoin, the control, the censorship resistance, the privacy. You're putting it in a centralized wrapper, and if you put Bitcoin in a centralized wrapper, you lose everything that's good about it. It's not Bitcoin. It's just an affinity marketing thing. It's “Hey, you like Bitcoin, go buy my other project." Just like, "Hey you like bitcoin? Go buy my altcoin." It's not the same thing, and I think in many ways it's a step backwards. I don't hate these people, but they certainly shouldn't be celebrated. It's not forwarding our industry if we do treasury strategies, if we do ETFs, we cheer for BlackRock and Cantor. That's a step backwards. It's not something to be cheerful for. It's not a victory, in my opinion. A victory is having more people have direct ownership of real Bitcoin. We now have millions of people who've been onboarded into this fake paper thing that's a claim on a claim on a claim of something that has Bitcoin in the words, but it's not actually Bitcoin. They are never actually holding a wallet like many of us did back in 2012 where somebody sent us that first dollar and you say, "Wow, this is cool. I didn't need to give my ID and I'm able to control and hold this sound money for the first time." You now have a whole generation of millions of people that don't have that. They have some junk fiat product sitting like sludge on their centralized brokerage account at the centralized clearing firm, traded on a centralized exchange, with a centralized transfer agent, and a centralized custodian, and they have to trust six levels of people on a claim for something that has the word ‘Bitcoin’ in it. It's not a victory. It's not a step forward. I don't think it's something that should be celebrated at all.”
2:00

“I'm not a huge hater of the institutions. I wasn't a huge hater of altcoins. These institutional products are just kind of altcoins. People can go make their money. Go do your thing. But it's not Bitcoin. An ETF is not Bitcoin. With these centralized projects, you're not getting the core values of Bitcoin, the control, the censorship resistance, the privacy. You're putting it in a centralized wrapper, and if you put Bitcoin in a centralized wrapper, you lose everything that's good about it. It's not Bitcoin. It's just an affinity marketing thing. It's “Hey, you like Bitcoin, go buy my other project." Just like, "Hey you like bitcoin? Go buy my altcoin." It's not the same thing, and I think in many ways it's a step backwards. I don't hate these people, but they certainly shouldn't be celebrated. It's not forwarding our industry if we do treasury strategies, if we do ETFs, we cheer for BlackRock and Cantor. That's a step backwards. It's not something to be cheerful for. It's not a victory, in my opinion. A victory is having more people have direct ownership of real Bitcoin. We now have millions of people who've been onboarded into this fake paper thing that's a claim on a claim on a claim of something that has Bitcoin in the words, but it's not actually Bitcoin. They are never actually holding a wallet like many of us did back in 2012 where somebody sent us that first dollar and you say, "Wow, this is cool. I didn't need to give my ID and I'm able to control and hold this sound money for the first time." You now have a whole generation of millions of people that don't have that. They have some junk fiat product sitting like sludge on their centralized brokerage account at the centralized clearing firm, traded on a centralized exchange, with a centralized transfer agent, and a centralized custodian, and they have to trust six levels of people on a claim for something that has the word ‘Bitcoin’ in it. It's not a victory. It's not a step forward. I don't think it's something that should be celebrated at all.”

Bruce Fenton

23,862 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

So, does it matter that Bitcoin seems to be moving away from its cypherpunk roots? Bitcoin ETFs and Bitcoin Treasuries have taken BTC mainstream. So I asked Saifedean Ammous this very question. His answer might surprise you... 👀👇 "If you have very strong feelings about how people should and shouldn't use Bitcoin, you're in for a rough time." "To be honest, a lot of people project too much onto Bitcoin. Ultimately, it's just a bunch of software and anybody can use it in any way they want. Initially, it's a small subset of people that use it and then they start projecting their values onto it. And then over time, they expect it to continue to abide by that," Ammous said. "If it's a successful technology, it's going to be used by everybody. It's going to be used by small businesses, large businesses, governments, individuals. It's money. Everybody uses money. There are 8.5 billion people on Earth, they all use money and they're all going to continue to use money. And Bitcoin is just the best money." Ultimately, the protocol itself is immune to the financial instruments that TradFi has concocted. If people want to lend against their BTC or create complex financial products, that does not actually impact the underlying network. "The way that the protocol works is that it's completely blind to what you're doing with your coins on the Bitcoin blockchain there is no paper Bitcoin there's no such thing as paper Bitcoin there's only 21 million Bitcoin and every node makes sure of that every 10 minutes and then if somebody who has some of these Bitcoin on their private key decides to sell obligations or financial liabilities referring to that Bitcoin under any condition, that's their choice. It's outside of Bitcoin and it's outside of the realm of other Bitcoin users being able to say this is right or wrong and this should happen or shouldn't happen. People are going to do whatever they want with the Bitcoin, including selling access to it or exposure to it in all kinds of different ways. And if you don't like it, you don't buy it, you can stack your own Bitcoin." You can find the full interview for Cointelegraph in the 🧵. If you enjoyed this content, please like 🧡, retweet 🔁 and follow me 👋!
1:57

So, does it matter that Bitcoin seems to be moving away from its cypherpunk roots? Bitcoin ETFs and Bitcoin Treasuries have taken BTC mainstream. So I asked Saifedean Ammous this very question. His answer might surprise you... 👀👇 "If you have very strong feelings about how people should and shouldn't use Bitcoin, you're in for a rough time." "To be honest, a lot of people project too much onto Bitcoin. Ultimately, it's just a bunch of software and anybody can use it in any way they want. Initially, it's a small subset of people that use it and then they start projecting their values onto it. And then over time, they expect it to continue to abide by that," Ammous said. "If it's a successful technology, it's going to be used by everybody. It's going to be used by small businesses, large businesses, governments, individuals. It's money. Everybody uses money. There are 8.5 billion people on Earth, they all use money and they're all going to continue to use money. And Bitcoin is just the best money." Ultimately, the protocol itself is immune to the financial instruments that TradFi has concocted. If people want to lend against their BTC or create complex financial products, that does not actually impact the underlying network. "The way that the protocol works is that it's completely blind to what you're doing with your coins on the Bitcoin blockchain there is no paper Bitcoin there's no such thing as paper Bitcoin there's only 21 million Bitcoin and every node makes sure of that every 10 minutes and then if somebody who has some of these Bitcoin on their private key decides to sell obligations or financial liabilities referring to that Bitcoin under any condition, that's their choice. It's outside of Bitcoin and it's outside of the realm of other Bitcoin users being able to say this is right or wrong and this should happen or shouldn't happen. People are going to do whatever they want with the Bitcoin, including selling access to it or exposure to it in all kinds of different ways. And if you don't like it, you don't buy it, you can stack your own Bitcoin." You can find the full interview for Cointelegraph in the 🧵. If you enjoyed this content, please like 🧡, retweet 🔁 and follow me 👋!

Gareth Jenkinson

34,417 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"If [we spend] all of our time on vote for Team Red [or] Blue...we're never going to be able to do anything that extricates us from their power...the more we get pushed into the Digital Age, the more dependent we become on them...so dependent...[we're] little better than slaves" This clip of Whitney Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Richard Grove (Richard Grove) posted to the Grand Theft World Podcast Rumble channel on August 3, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "If we spend all our time and energy and activism and all of that on electoral politics, on this circus clown show, we're not spending any time building a parallel economic structure or something that will give us resilience at the local level, you know, because if anything, this, there's some, there's lots of things that get repeated in cycles, right? Ever since these oligarchs have been in charge. "And one of those things is wealth transfers. They happen every so often. There's a crisis, that they engineer and create, and then the government response is to take regular people's money. And that is likely to happen again, especially now that the Stablecoin Act has passed Congress. We are going to get a digital dollar. You may think, stablecoins are better than a CBDC, but they are just as bad. Especially if what you're worried about with the CBDC is programmability, surveillability, seizability. "You know, do you think JP Morgan is not going to censor you and steal your money and all this stuff or Deba— or PayPal with their stablecoin? You know, if anyone remembers from the COVID era, PayPal debanked many people. JP Morgan also debanked people. And they, you know, there was no recourse there. So it's not necessarily better to give that kind of control over to a, a private entity. Okay, so it's not the Fed, but it's, it's JP Morgan and all of these banks that, you know, took your taxpayer money in 2008, it's people even less accountable than the Fed. Now it's going to be in the, it's in the cloud. We don't know who's on the other end. "But if you're familiar, you know, with how the Fed came to be, and it was these entrenched banking dynasties taking control of monetary policy in the United States, what better way? I mean, the Fed, for them, when they did that, it was the middleman between them and the government. But now what we're doing is that we're taking out the middleman with what's happening now. So expect an effort to wealth transfer. And it's not like, I mean, if you think Trump isn't going to facilitate the bankers' designs, I would urge you to investigate, some of Trump's history or what the monetary policy his administration did during COVID the Going Direct Reset, which was basically fleece everyone that's not in the top few percent of the country and a lot of people don't even know that happened. "If you'd like to know more, you can go to Catherine Austin Fitts' Solari report or look at the work of John Titus on this. It's very well documented and very bad. And it was designed by BlackRock, who used to be Trump's former, Larry Fink used to be Trump's former money manager. And of course once BlackRock got involved in the Bitcoin ETF business, Bitcoin culture started to slow decline from being anti-state and libertarian to being. We love the government government and we love stablecoins and we love buying us government debt and all, all this madness. So you know, it's very important to develop economic resilience and we can do that at the local level and stop empowering these people. "You know, I think one of the reasons too why like Israel invested so much time and money and effort, covert and overt, in challenging the BDS movement. Boycott, divest sanctions, economic boycotts are powerful and we can boycott the oligarchs and if we're spending all of our time on vote for Team Red and Blue, and all of that, we're never going to be able to do anything that extricates us from their, their power. And the more we get pushed into the digital age, the more dependent we become on them for everything. "And people need to really seriously think about how we avoid you know, basically becoming so dependent that we have no choice to basically be little better than slaves to these people at points."
3:56

"If [we spend] all of our time on vote for Team Red [or] Blue...we're never going to be able to do anything that extricates us from their power...the more we get pushed into the Digital Age, the more dependent we become on them...so dependent...[we're] little better than slaves" This clip of Whitney Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Richard Grove (Richard Grove) posted to the Grand Theft World Podcast Rumble channel on August 3, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "If we spend all our time and energy and activism and all of that on electoral politics, on this circus clown show, we're not spending any time building a parallel economic structure or something that will give us resilience at the local level, you know, because if anything, this, there's some, there's lots of things that get repeated in cycles, right? Ever since these oligarchs have been in charge. "And one of those things is wealth transfers. They happen every so often. There's a crisis, that they engineer and create, and then the government response is to take regular people's money. And that is likely to happen again, especially now that the Stablecoin Act has passed Congress. We are going to get a digital dollar. You may think, stablecoins are better than a CBDC, but they are just as bad. Especially if what you're worried about with the CBDC is programmability, surveillability, seizability. "You know, do you think JP Morgan is not going to censor you and steal your money and all this stuff or Deba— or PayPal with their stablecoin? You know, if anyone remembers from the COVID era, PayPal debanked many people. JP Morgan also debanked people. And they, you know, there was no recourse there. So it's not necessarily better to give that kind of control over to a, a private entity. Okay, so it's not the Fed, but it's, it's JP Morgan and all of these banks that, you know, took your taxpayer money in 2008, it's people even less accountable than the Fed. Now it's going to be in the, it's in the cloud. We don't know who's on the other end. "But if you're familiar, you know, with how the Fed came to be, and it was these entrenched banking dynasties taking control of monetary policy in the United States, what better way? I mean, the Fed, for them, when they did that, it was the middleman between them and the government. But now what we're doing is that we're taking out the middleman with what's happening now. So expect an effort to wealth transfer. And it's not like, I mean, if you think Trump isn't going to facilitate the bankers' designs, I would urge you to investigate, some of Trump's history or what the monetary policy his administration did during COVID the Going Direct Reset, which was basically fleece everyone that's not in the top few percent of the country and a lot of people don't even know that happened. "If you'd like to know more, you can go to Catherine Austin Fitts' Solari report or look at the work of John Titus on this. It's very well documented and very bad. And it was designed by BlackRock, who used to be Trump's former, Larry Fink used to be Trump's former money manager. And of course once BlackRock got involved in the Bitcoin ETF business, Bitcoin culture started to slow decline from being anti-state and libertarian to being. We love the government government and we love stablecoins and we love buying us government debt and all, all this madness. So you know, it's very important to develop economic resilience and we can do that at the local level and stop empowering these people. "You know, I think one of the reasons too why like Israel invested so much time and money and effort, covert and overt, in challenging the BDS movement. Boycott, divest sanctions, economic boycotts are powerful and we can boycott the oligarchs and if we're spending all of our time on vote for Team Red and Blue, and all of that, we're never going to be able to do anything that extricates us from their, their power. And the more we get pushed into the digital age, the more dependent we become on them for everything. "And people need to really seriously think about how we avoid you know, basically becoming so dependent that we have no choice to basically be little better than slaves to these people at points."

Sense Receptor

36,328 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC: “There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about. And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally broken. We don’t right now, but you always have to look at the underlying technology and the crypto. What the Bitcoin community has been asking itself is: Is there enough encryption in Bitcoin, because quantum computing is coming? And secondly: Is there enough privacy in Bitcoin? And so a lot of Bitcoin OGs or maxis have been looking at Zcash. Zcash is a token. It’s sort of related to Bitcoin with a lot more privacy. The kind of garbage that we got about Bitcoin four years ago was: ‘It’s used for all bad illicit behavior.’ But now everyone kind of realizes that when you move money around on the Bitcoin blockchain, you can see it. You can see it move from one wallet to another. And a lot of people are looking for more privacy.”
1:00

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC: “There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about. And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally broken. We don’t right now, but you always have to look at the underlying technology and the crypto. What the Bitcoin community has been asking itself is: Is there enough encryption in Bitcoin, because quantum computing is coming? And secondly: Is there enough privacy in Bitcoin? And so a lot of Bitcoin OGs or maxis have been looking at Zcash. Zcash is a token. It’s sort of related to Bitcoin with a lot more privacy. The kind of garbage that we got about Bitcoin four years ago was: ‘It’s used for all bad illicit behavior.’ But now everyone kind of realizes that when you move money around on the Bitcoin blockchain, you can see it. You can see it move from one wallet to another. And a lot of people are looking for more privacy.”

Arjun Khemani

568,617 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Zack Snyder on his dyslexia: "It was a challenge for me when I was, you know, young in school, and all I wanted to do was make movies because that was the thing that I got great pleasure from and reward from. I love books, and I'm an avid reader, but I just have a hard time because of the way that I perceive. "I've had a great sort of - one side of me anyways - was really satisfied by art and drawing and sculpture and sort of visual expression. And I think that that started to, you know, was the thing that kind of made me feel un-frustrated. And also the way the system was designed, sort of not to support me when I was in high school at that time. "It was very difficult, you know, there was a lot of, you know, just, difficulty. My English teacher in high school was worried about what my career would be, and I'm like. He would be happy to know that I'm in the Writers Guild of America now. "But, I think that that all those things are, they're all... you can transcend all those things with perseverance and with interest and with with help. And I think that that's an important part of it. "And I just think I've had to adapt, and sort of... I have my own style of the way I write, I write all, you know, but I'm pretty prolific. And I love- I listen to tons of audio books on tape, unabridged hours and hours and hours. That's all I do when I'm driving in the car or wherever I'm doing. And it's helped me a lot. "And yeah, I mean, I just hope that anyone who is- feels trapped or frustrated by the world in general. You know, they need to just, I think that we all have like a magic spark, and you need to just find the thing that makes you, you know, inspires you and, and gets you excited and pursue it as hard as you can find your passion in the world. That's a, that's a great motivator."
2:59

Zack Snyder on his dyslexia: "It was a challenge for me when I was, you know, young in school, and all I wanted to do was make movies because that was the thing that I got great pleasure from and reward from. I love books, and I'm an avid reader, but I just have a hard time because of the way that I perceive. "I've had a great sort of - one side of me anyways - was really satisfied by art and drawing and sculpture and sort of visual expression. And I think that that started to, you know, was the thing that kind of made me feel un-frustrated. And also the way the system was designed, sort of not to support me when I was in high school at that time. "It was very difficult, you know, there was a lot of, you know, just, difficulty. My English teacher in high school was worried about what my career would be, and I'm like. He would be happy to know that I'm in the Writers Guild of America now. "But, I think that that all those things are, they're all... you can transcend all those things with perseverance and with interest and with with help. And I think that that's an important part of it. "And I just think I've had to adapt, and sort of... I have my own style of the way I write, I write all, you know, but I'm pretty prolific. And I love- I listen to tons of audio books on tape, unabridged hours and hours and hours. That's all I do when I'm driving in the car or wherever I'm doing. And it's helped me a lot. "And yeah, I mean, I just hope that anyone who is- feels trapped or frustrated by the world in general. You know, they need to just, I think that we all have like a magic spark, and you need to just find the thing that makes you, you know, inspires you and, and gets you excited and pursue it as hard as you can find your passion in the world. That's a, that's a great motivator."

Zack Snyder Film

11,128 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Whitney Webb, February 19, 2026: "The Clinton Foundation, I would argue, was largely set up... by Epstein. That's particularly true for the Clinton Health Access Initiative, and a lot of its work in Africa with AIDS, which obviously coincides with a lot of vaccination policy." "And at the same time that Clinton set up his foundation, Bill Gates set up his foundation. They collaborate together on those things. And Epstein has also obviously had an interest in these types of networks as well, 'for health,' they say." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Clayton Morris (Clayton Morris) and Natali Morris (Natali Morris) posted to the Redacted YouTube channel (Redacted) on February 19, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Yeah, so the Clinton Foundation, I would argue, was largely set up— major aspects of... it were provably set up by Epstein. That's particularly true for the Clinton Health Access Initiative, and a lot of its work in Africa with AIDS, which obviously coincides with a lot of vaccination policy. "And at the same time that Clinton set up his foundation, Bill Gates set up his foundation. They collaborate together on those things. And Epstein has also obviously had an interest in these types of networks as well, 'for health,' they say. "But obviously, you know, in the COVID era, we became a lot more skeptical of those types of quote-unquote philanthropies. And obviously Bill Gates as well as Epstein himself, as, as particularly revealed by some of these new releases, but it was known before, have an outsized interest in eugenics and also transhumanism, which is the modern rebranding of eugenics. "Even some of the people that used to run the British Eugenics Society, like Julian Huxley, you know, authored texts in the mid 20th century talking about how transhumanism was the future of eugenics and this is how they'd sell it to a new generation. These people are intimately involved with a lot of this stuff. "And, you know, Epstein was intimately involved in those aspects. But we have to go back to, to Epstein being intimately involved also in illicit cash flows, which the Clintons absolutely love and have loved for a long time, ever since Clinton, was, you know, Governor of Arkansas through the presidency and after, and so, you know, Clinton Foundation has obviously been dogged by what were once rumors, but thanks to WikiLeaks became, you know, proven, that it was basically a pay-to-play scam, and that they were taking money and then returning political favors when Hillary Clinton was, you know, Secretary of State or, they thought she might even be president, right? "And then after, you know, she lost to Trump in 2016, it, it dried up, essentially. But also, you know, in addition to the, the other philanthropies, you have the Clinton Global Initiative, which was allegedly Epstein's idea. According to his defense lawyers. He was part of the core team that developed the concept for the Clinton Global Initiative, which is kind of like a Clinton broker Davos, you know, World Economic Forum style meeting. "But they passed money around to, you know, Ghislaine Maxwell's TerraMar, for example, you know, among other things. And so, you know, Epstein was obviously very sought out in the not-profit world, arguably because he was very good at tax shelters. And a lot of these billionaires want to, you know, get tax write-offs or not have to pay money in tax. "And so, you know, setting up these philanthropies the right way. When Epstein's background, going back to his time at Bear Stearns, was in tax evasion, you know, obviously I think that that points to why they were so interested, in having him be involved in setting up their nonprofits. "And there's also the fact that you had Epstein, you know, I think it was Bill Gates, wanted to talk to Epstein about getting a Nobel Prize, apparently because he had influence over the Nobel Prize committee. So, I mean, it went even beyond nonprofits. "And so a lot of this world that we, the public has been shown, about these do-gooder nonprofits and these do-gooder philanthropists, it's, you know, Epstein was an expert in money laundering, he also became an expert in reputation laundering, for these, these billionaires, most of which are criminals and some of whom are provably connected to organized crime."
3:32

Whitney Webb, February 19, 2026: "The Clinton Foundation, I would argue, was largely set up... by Epstein. That's particularly true for the Clinton Health Access Initiative, and a lot of its work in Africa with AIDS, which obviously coincides with a lot of vaccination policy." "And at the same time that Clinton set up his foundation, Bill Gates set up his foundation. They collaborate together on those things. And Epstein has also obviously had an interest in these types of networks as well, 'for health,' they say." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Clayton Morris (Clayton Morris) and Natali Morris (Natali Morris) posted to the Redacted YouTube channel (Redacted) on February 19, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Yeah, so the Clinton Foundation, I would argue, was largely set up— major aspects of... it were provably set up by Epstein. That's particularly true for the Clinton Health Access Initiative, and a lot of its work in Africa with AIDS, which obviously coincides with a lot of vaccination policy. "And at the same time that Clinton set up his foundation, Bill Gates set up his foundation. They collaborate together on those things. And Epstein has also obviously had an interest in these types of networks as well, 'for health,' they say. "But obviously, you know, in the COVID era, we became a lot more skeptical of those types of quote-unquote philanthropies. And obviously Bill Gates as well as Epstein himself, as, as particularly revealed by some of these new releases, but it was known before, have an outsized interest in eugenics and also transhumanism, which is the modern rebranding of eugenics. "Even some of the people that used to run the British Eugenics Society, like Julian Huxley, you know, authored texts in the mid 20th century talking about how transhumanism was the future of eugenics and this is how they'd sell it to a new generation. These people are intimately involved with a lot of this stuff. "And, you know, Epstein was intimately involved in those aspects. But we have to go back to, to Epstein being intimately involved also in illicit cash flows, which the Clintons absolutely love and have loved for a long time, ever since Clinton, was, you know, Governor of Arkansas through the presidency and after, and so, you know, Clinton Foundation has obviously been dogged by what were once rumors, but thanks to WikiLeaks became, you know, proven, that it was basically a pay-to-play scam, and that they were taking money and then returning political favors when Hillary Clinton was, you know, Secretary of State or, they thought she might even be president, right? "And then after, you know, she lost to Trump in 2016, it, it dried up, essentially. But also, you know, in addition to the, the other philanthropies, you have the Clinton Global Initiative, which was allegedly Epstein's idea. According to his defense lawyers. He was part of the core team that developed the concept for the Clinton Global Initiative, which is kind of like a Clinton broker Davos, you know, World Economic Forum style meeting. "But they passed money around to, you know, Ghislaine Maxwell's TerraMar, for example, you know, among other things. And so, you know, Epstein was obviously very sought out in the not-profit world, arguably because he was very good at tax shelters. And a lot of these billionaires want to, you know, get tax write-offs or not have to pay money in tax. "And so, you know, setting up these philanthropies the right way. When Epstein's background, going back to his time at Bear Stearns, was in tax evasion, you know, obviously I think that that points to why they were so interested, in having him be involved in setting up their nonprofits. "And there's also the fact that you had Epstein, you know, I think it was Bill Gates, wanted to talk to Epstein about getting a Nobel Prize, apparently because he had influence over the Nobel Prize committee. So, I mean, it went even beyond nonprofits. "And so a lot of this world that we, the public has been shown, about these do-gooder nonprofits and these do-gooder philanthropists, it's, you know, Epstein was an expert in money laundering, he also became an expert in reputation laundering, for these, these billionaires, most of which are criminals and some of whom are provably connected to organized crime."

Sense Receptor

21,764 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd on mass tokenization and "The Great Taking" "Tokenization... gives a central planner the ability to veto... transactions" "It's a massive land grab and power grab" "[But] I think [it's] a bridge too far and people will get very agitated" This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), a former BlackRock fund manager and co-founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Brannon Howse (Brannon Howse) posted to YouTube on May 27, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Well, we need to stop it. And I don't know what we can do, but it's certainly alarming. "And this tokenization of everything, basically the way Catherine Austin Fitts describes it, and I agree with her, right now, currently, when you have a sale, or a purchase, there are two parties. There's me and there's the company. Tokenization introduces a third person in the party who gets to approve that transaction. "Right now, I can interact with someone and buy something, and someone can interact with me and buy something that I offer. You get tokenization involved, it gives a central planner the ability to veto the transaction. And I think that is definitely anti-humanity, anti-freedom, anti-capitalism. It's a massive land grab and power grab. "And look, tokenization would introduce the ability of someone to a third party to approve or not approve the transaction. I mean, you want to go to the dystopian end of this. Let's say central planners decided they wanted meat quotas. And you go to the, the grocery store and you, I guess you've already had your meat quota for the month. They would be able to block that transaction at the register. "So the person at the register couldn't do anything and would tell you to return the meat. And if you try to take it out of there, you'd be stealing even though you had the money. "[And] I will say this. If they try the Great Taking or they try this mass tokenization, I think that's a bridge too far and people will get very agitated. And if you really want to inflame and enrage the populace, especially in America, try taking their assets or telling them they're worth— Try telling someone their stock portfolio is worth one tenth of what it was because we needed to bail out the system. That's not going to go over very well."
2:37

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd on mass tokenization and "The Great Taking" "Tokenization... gives a central planner the ability to veto... transactions" "It's a massive land grab and power grab" "[But] I think [it's] a bridge too far and people will get very agitated" This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), a former BlackRock fund manager and co-founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Brannon Howse (Brannon Howse) posted to YouTube on May 27, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Well, we need to stop it. And I don't know what we can do, but it's certainly alarming. "And this tokenization of everything, basically the way Catherine Austin Fitts describes it, and I agree with her, right now, currently, when you have a sale, or a purchase, there are two parties. There's me and there's the company. Tokenization introduces a third person in the party who gets to approve that transaction. "Right now, I can interact with someone and buy something, and someone can interact with me and buy something that I offer. You get tokenization involved, it gives a central planner the ability to veto the transaction. And I think that is definitely anti-humanity, anti-freedom, anti-capitalism. It's a massive land grab and power grab. "And look, tokenization would introduce the ability of someone to a third party to approve or not approve the transaction. I mean, you want to go to the dystopian end of this. Let's say central planners decided they wanted meat quotas. And you go to the, the grocery store and you, I guess you've already had your meat quota for the month. They would be able to block that transaction at the register. "So the person at the register couldn't do anything and would tell you to return the meat. And if you try to take it out of there, you'd be stealing even though you had the money. "[And] I will say this. If they try the Great Taking or they try this mass tokenization, I think that's a bridge too far and people will get very agitated. And if you really want to inflame and enrage the populace, especially in America, try taking their assets or telling them they're worth— Try telling someone their stock portfolio is worth one tenth of what it was because we needed to bail out the system. That's not going to go over very well."

Sense Receptor

57,370 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Secret D.C. Underground: Blackmail ops, Money laundering, and the Occult. It's always been about the children. They just didn't want you to know that it was.
13:26

The Secret D.C. Underground: Blackmail ops, Money laundering, and the Occult. It's always been about the children. They just didn't want you to know that it was.

The SCIF

246,148 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

You mean this interview on Wednesday’s ‘Good Morning America’ wasn’t enough to save Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of ‘The Bachelorette’ in light of video showing her beating her ex-boyfriend? Lara Spencer: “I want to hear all about your bachelorette journey. But first I want to give you the opportunity to respond to recent headlines about the alleged domestic violence incident with your ex-boyfriend. What do you want to share with us about this?” Paul: “Honestly, I — it's been a heavy time to see the headlines, especially during this time of The Bachelorette being released and it's supposed to be really exciting time. I'm a person that will always speak my truth and I'm — you know, that's what I'm known for. And so, when the time is right I will be. But right now, just trying to be in the present moment and focus on this and — but the thing is — is my — my kids do come first. My kids come first. And so, it's been, like, just a back and forth process trying to be here in the present moment, worrying about, you know, home and headlines. It's been stressful to be honest.” Spencer: “We did reach out to Dakota. And he did not — we did not — for a statement. We did not get a response from him. Now we have reports that ‘The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives’ has paused production on the next season. I know there's a season on right now and then season five was in production. Reports say it's been — it's paused. Is that true?” Paul: “Honestly I — I don't call the shots with production. So, as of now I have gotten word that it also has been paused, but I do not call those shots. So, as far as I know it — it was, but I don't know for how long and why.” Spencer: “And — and I know you're one of the executive producers on the show.” Paul: “Yeah, yeah. I got told that this — this year.” Spencer: “Oh, you didn't know that?” Paul: “I — I didn't. No. And I was like, what does that mean? You know, I was, like, like, I think just because we share our lives and we produce like our own, you know, lives.” Spencer: “Yeah. Paul: “But I don't know if that necessarily what that — what that means.” Spencer: “And how do you — how do you envision your future on that show?” Paul: “Hard to say now, right?” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “Just because of, you know, everything going on. It's hard to see past this. I'm not going to lie. In this moment, it's just so heavy. And when your life is broadcasted out there in these headlines, it's, like, the end of the world.” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “That's what it feels like. I'm not going to lie. But I will say I've, I've been here before and I got through it and, you know, shared my story, my life. So I — I'm hoping that I can do that again.” Spencer: “Yeah.”
2:15

You mean this interview on Wednesday’s ‘Good Morning America’ wasn’t enough to save Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of ‘The Bachelorette’ in light of video showing her beating her ex-boyfriend? Lara Spencer: “I want to hear all about your bachelorette journey. But first I want to give you the opportunity to respond to recent headlines about the alleged domestic violence incident with your ex-boyfriend. What do you want to share with us about this?” Paul: “Honestly, I — it's been a heavy time to see the headlines, especially during this time of The Bachelorette being released and it's supposed to be really exciting time. I'm a person that will always speak my truth and I'm — you know, that's what I'm known for. And so, when the time is right I will be. But right now, just trying to be in the present moment and focus on this and — but the thing is — is my — my kids do come first. My kids come first. And so, it's been, like, just a back and forth process trying to be here in the present moment, worrying about, you know, home and headlines. It's been stressful to be honest.” Spencer: “We did reach out to Dakota. And he did not — we did not — for a statement. We did not get a response from him. Now we have reports that ‘The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives’ has paused production on the next season. I know there's a season on right now and then season five was in production. Reports say it's been — it's paused. Is that true?” Paul: “Honestly I — I don't call the shots with production. So, as of now I have gotten word that it also has been paused, but I do not call those shots. So, as far as I know it — it was, but I don't know for how long and why.” Spencer: “And — and I know you're one of the executive producers on the show.” Paul: “Yeah, yeah. I got told that this — this year.” Spencer: “Oh, you didn't know that?” Paul: “I — I didn't. No. And I was like, what does that mean? You know, I was, like, like, I think just because we share our lives and we produce like our own, you know, lives.” Spencer: “Yeah. Paul: “But I don't know if that necessarily what that — what that means.” Spencer: “And how do you — how do you envision your future on that show?” Paul: “Hard to say now, right?” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “Just because of, you know, everything going on. It's hard to see past this. I'm not going to lie. In this moment, it's just so heavy. And when your life is broadcasted out there in these headlines, it's, like, the end of the world.” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “That's what it feels like. I'm not going to lie. But I will say I've, I've been here before and I got through it and, you know, shared my story, my life. So I — I'm hoping that I can do that again.” Spencer: “Yeah.”

Curtis Houck

1,082,879 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Whitney Webb: "A lot of people forget... the ban on propaganda being used domestically against Americans was lifted under the Obama administration... now with all of this extreme media consolidation by this specific cabal of billionaires and oligarchs, the propaganda is already bad[, and] I would argue... is going to get even worse." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout, is taken from an interview with Chris Hedges (Chris Hedges) posted to YouTube on October 22, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's an unprecedented effort of course, to propagandize the American people, to have us willingly walk in and support and consent to these systems being installed, because a lot of people forget. But the ban on propaganda, being used domestically against Americans was lifted under the Obama administration. And now with all of this extreme media consolidation by the specific cabal of billionaires and oligarchs and the, the propaganda is already bad, I would argue, but is going to get even worse to get people to consent to these systems specifically. "And I think a lot of what we're going to see is going to be sort of a repeated trope of what we saw on the War on Terror. We have to give up all of our all of these new freedoms, or all of these freedoms and things like that, because we have to go after Al Qaeda and get them at all costs. But now, you know, 20 plus years later, you have you know, the head of Al Qaeda in Syria being given a diplomat, you know, I don't even know what to call it. It's so ridiculous. Like a red carpet welcome to shake hands with David Petraeus and all of this. "So we lost all of our freedoms, but now Al Qaeda is just, you know, let's, let's shake hands and let them come to the UN while we don't let anyone from Palestine come. I mean it's totally insane. So I think it's quite possible that given that we're seeing this effort to gin up a war on domestic terrorism yet again, we're going to be, given another invisible enemy, and told that we need to give up all of these remaining freedoms and civil liberties to go after the domestic terrorists and that it's going to be, you know, unfortunately a lot of the depravity that we witnessed during the War on Terror, but directed domestically, hence the name domestic terrorism. "And I think you can argue that was always the plan post 9/11. A lot of the stuff was focused domestically. Before 9/11 there were efforts to pass DHS as the National Homeland Security Agency. It stalled in Congress, of course, after 9/11, no longer stalled. And so DHS was created, in a lot of these, you know, security agencies. And the expansion of the national security state in general has also, you know, had a lot of tentacles domestically. "And I think Americans have been naive that a lot of the evil, that that national security, security state has done abroad would never be used against them. And I think that, you know, we need to be very aware of what is going on here, and that the Deep State, if you— whatever you want to call it, is expanding. And it's expanding in the hands of private oligarchs that have a very dangerous political vision that is rarely talked about."
2:54

Whitney Webb: "A lot of people forget... the ban on propaganda being used domestically against Americans was lifted under the Obama administration... now with all of this extreme media consolidation by this specific cabal of billionaires and oligarchs, the propaganda is already bad[, and] I would argue... is going to get even worse." This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout, is taken from an interview with Chris Hedges (Chris Hedges) posted to YouTube on October 22, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's an unprecedented effort of course, to propagandize the American people, to have us willingly walk in and support and consent to these systems being installed, because a lot of people forget. But the ban on propaganda, being used domestically against Americans was lifted under the Obama administration. And now with all of this extreme media consolidation by the specific cabal of billionaires and oligarchs and the, the propaganda is already bad, I would argue, but is going to get even worse to get people to consent to these systems specifically. "And I think a lot of what we're going to see is going to be sort of a repeated trope of what we saw on the War on Terror. We have to give up all of our all of these new freedoms, or all of these freedoms and things like that, because we have to go after Al Qaeda and get them at all costs. But now, you know, 20 plus years later, you have you know, the head of Al Qaeda in Syria being given a diplomat, you know, I don't even know what to call it. It's so ridiculous. Like a red carpet welcome to shake hands with David Petraeus and all of this. "So we lost all of our freedoms, but now Al Qaeda is just, you know, let's, let's shake hands and let them come to the UN while we don't let anyone from Palestine come. I mean it's totally insane. So I think it's quite possible that given that we're seeing this effort to gin up a war on domestic terrorism yet again, we're going to be, given another invisible enemy, and told that we need to give up all of these remaining freedoms and civil liberties to go after the domestic terrorists and that it's going to be, you know, unfortunately a lot of the depravity that we witnessed during the War on Terror, but directed domestically, hence the name domestic terrorism. "And I think you can argue that was always the plan post 9/11. A lot of the stuff was focused domestically. Before 9/11 there were efforts to pass DHS as the National Homeland Security Agency. It stalled in Congress, of course, after 9/11, no longer stalled. And so DHS was created, in a lot of these, you know, security agencies. And the expansion of the national security state in general has also, you know, had a lot of tentacles domestically. "And I think Americans have been naive that a lot of the evil, that that national security, security state has done abroad would never be used against them. And I think that, you know, we need to be very aware of what is going on here, and that the Deep State, if you— whatever you want to call it, is expanding. And it's expanding in the hands of private oligarchs that have a very dangerous political vision that is rarely talked about."

Sense Receptor

28,630 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Whitney Webb "It sucks to find out that the mob runs the world... [so] do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to... get off your... slave plantation?... [because] we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't... climb out" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Peter McCormack (The Peter McCormack Show) posted to YouTube on September 4, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "It's not just about burning it down, it's about putting something better in its place. Of course. And so I think the solutions there, you know, some people are like, oh, Whitney, your work is so demoralizing. Well, I'm like, yeah, it sucks to find out that the mob runs the world, you know, but the question is, or do you just want to let them keep running it because it bums you out, or do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to build something else and get off your, you know, slave plantation? "And I am in the group of, I would like to build something else. I have three kids. I do not want them living in a world run by the mob. So what are you going to do about it? I mean, it starts locally, it starts with your community, because that's where we can actually affect change. Voting for left or right, blue or red. I mean, it's just this ping pong thing where nothing fundamental is changing. "And so to affect that change, we have to do it ourselves. And you think this would be a core American value? Individualism, individual responsibility. But a lot of people just don't care. And so, you know, that sucks. But I think those of us that do care need, to take steps to be as independent from the system as possible. Because every so often, this predator class, they do wealth transfers or they orchestrate and manufacture events and they make a big grab, not just for our money, but for our rights. And we're at the point where we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't climb ourself out. Can't climb out. "So what, what should we do before that happens? There is an important window of time to do something about it in our local community and for our families and our friends and our neighbors. And we have to do something because if we don't and that thing happens. Oh, well, I watched all these podcasts and learned about how corrupt everything is. But, you know, and I think they spend a lot of time trying to keep us distracted on all sorts of things and sucked into things that don't matter. So that we just don't give them the finger, basically. And that's what we really need to do."
2:12

Whitney Webb "It sucks to find out that the mob runs the world... [so] do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to... get off your... slave plantation?... [because] we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't... climb out" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Peter McCormack (The Peter McCormack Show) posted to YouTube on September 4, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "It's not just about burning it down, it's about putting something better in its place. Of course. And so I think the solutions there, you know, some people are like, oh, Whitney, your work is so demoralizing. Well, I'm like, yeah, it sucks to find out that the mob runs the world, you know, but the question is, or do you just want to let them keep running it because it bums you out, or do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to build something else and get off your, you know, slave plantation? "And I am in the group of, I would like to build something else. I have three kids. I do not want them living in a world run by the mob. So what are you going to do about it? I mean, it starts locally, it starts with your community, because that's where we can actually affect change. Voting for left or right, blue or red. I mean, it's just this ping pong thing where nothing fundamental is changing. "And so to affect that change, we have to do it ourselves. And you think this would be a core American value? Individualism, individual responsibility. But a lot of people just don't care. And so, you know, that sucks. But I think those of us that do care need, to take steps to be as independent from the system as possible. Because every so often, this predator class, they do wealth transfers or they orchestrate and manufacture events and they make a big grab, not just for our money, but for our rights. And we're at the point where we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't climb ourself out. Can't climb out. "So what, what should we do before that happens? There is an important window of time to do something about it in our local community and for our families and our friends and our neighbors. And we have to do something because if we don't and that thing happens. Oh, well, I watched all these podcasts and learned about how corrupt everything is. But, you know, and I think they spend a lot of time trying to keep us distracted on all sorts of things and sucked into things that don't matter. So that we just don't give them the finger, basically. And that's what we really need to do."

Sense Receptor

46,951 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🗨️| “Absolutely beautiful place. I'd spent a bit of time there on tour, but not enough time, you know, not working. Um, and I just wanted to surround myself with the kind of atmosphere and feelings that I wanted from the records. And, you know, the more you surround yourself by that, it, that those feelings are infectious completely. Um, there was a lovely kind of tempo to where we were in Costa Rica, place called Santa Teresa. It's like really kind of slow and like lovely like way of living. So the kind of tranquility that you'd hope for when making a record, it's often the other way and pressure, pressure, pressure. It was really nice to kind of, lay back on that. And in terms of the honesty on the record, I almost meant that in a slightly less literal sense. I've always been a quite a motive and honest songwriter, but I think this is the first time that I've been willing to embrace things that I was maybe a little bit scared of at first. It was really important to me post One Direction to kind of show who I was as an artist. So I resisted anything that was too close to centre. All the while forgetting that's what created me, you know, and that's the reason I'm sat in this chair. So I think it's, this record comes from a braver and more Honest standpoint. Yeah, I just, I deserve melodic songs like, Lemonade, you know, and like Palaces where in the past I might have kind of ignored melodies like that. So yeah, that's kind of what I meant by the record that I always deserve to make.” — Louis Tomlinson via #MostRequestedLive
1:28

🗨️| “Absolutely beautiful place. I'd spent a bit of time there on tour, but not enough time, you know, not working. Um, and I just wanted to surround myself with the kind of atmosphere and feelings that I wanted from the records. And, you know, the more you surround yourself by that, it, that those feelings are infectious completely. Um, there was a lovely kind of tempo to where we were in Costa Rica, place called Santa Teresa. It's like really kind of slow and like lovely like way of living. So the kind of tranquility that you'd hope for when making a record, it's often the other way and pressure, pressure, pressure. It was really nice to kind of, lay back on that. And in terms of the honesty on the record, I almost meant that in a slightly less literal sense. I've always been a quite a motive and honest songwriter, but I think this is the first time that I've been willing to embrace things that I was maybe a little bit scared of at first. It was really important to me post One Direction to kind of show who I was as an artist. So I resisted anything that was too close to centre. All the while forgetting that's what created me, you know, and that's the reason I'm sat in this chair. So I think it's, this record comes from a braver and more Honest standpoint. Yeah, I just, I deserve melodic songs like, Lemonade, you know, and like Palaces where in the past I might have kind of ignored melodies like that. So yeah, that's kind of what I meant by the record that I always deserve to make.” — Louis Tomlinson via #MostRequestedLive

World Tomlinson

11,606 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"They put Trump in to get the control grid... [and he gets an] A+++. He's done a fabulous job... But... I don't think they need [him] anymore. That doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can... by the end of the year...." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an interview with Paul Buitink (Paul Buitink 🎙) posted to the Reinvent Money YouTube channel on August 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So I think they put Trump in to get the control grid. And we have, at Solari, we have a collection that we update every week of all the things the administration is doing to build the control grid. And I have to tell you, if I had chosen Trump to get the control grid, and I was going to grade him on his performance to date, he gets an A plus plus plus. He's done a fabulous job. And I can't imagine another politician who could have done this much this fast "But if you look at what they've achieved, I don't think they need Trump anymore. Now, that doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can. "So I don't know if he was using a lot in the campaign. I think Kash Patel was using it a lot, and I think Dan Bongino was using it a lot. "So here's who pushed it. And I didn't realize this until recently, because I was very early on in saying QAnon was a hope porn and ridiculous and not to pay any attention to it. But what I didn't understand was QAnon made a very big deal about Epstein and pedophilia and Trump secretly cleaning it all up. "And basically the Democrats were engaged in pedophilia and they were at the heart of Epstein and Trump was going to secretly clean it all up. So QAnon apparently made a huge deal about Epstein. And, you know, that is seriously, in my opinion, and I say this because I know many people trapped in it, you know, it's a cult, it's just a completely adult fairy tale, but they believed it. And so now that he's coming out and saying, oh, it was a hoax, you know, Epstein is a hoax, it flies completely in the face of the cult. So now we've got a really big problem. And I don't know why he didn't put it back in the box. I don't know why. "If the people who run the system want Trump out, they can use Epstein to do it. It will work, and they can get him out by the end of the year if they want."
2:51

"They put Trump in to get the control grid... [and he gets an] A+++. He's done a fabulous job... But... I don't think they need [him] anymore. That doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can... by the end of the year...." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an interview with Paul Buitink (Paul Buitink 🎙) posted to the Reinvent Money YouTube channel on August 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So I think they put Trump in to get the control grid. And we have, at Solari, we have a collection that we update every week of all the things the administration is doing to build the control grid. And I have to tell you, if I had chosen Trump to get the control grid, and I was going to grade him on his performance to date, he gets an A plus plus plus. He's done a fabulous job. And I can't imagine another politician who could have done this much this fast "But if you look at what they've achieved, I don't think they need Trump anymore. Now, that doesn't mean they're gonna get rid of him, but if they wanna get rid of him with Epstein, they can. "So I don't know if he was using a lot in the campaign. I think Kash Patel was using it a lot, and I think Dan Bongino was using it a lot. "So here's who pushed it. And I didn't realize this until recently, because I was very early on in saying QAnon was a hope porn and ridiculous and not to pay any attention to it. But what I didn't understand was QAnon made a very big deal about Epstein and pedophilia and Trump secretly cleaning it all up. "And basically the Democrats were engaged in pedophilia and they were at the heart of Epstein and Trump was going to secretly clean it all up. So QAnon apparently made a huge deal about Epstein. And, you know, that is seriously, in my opinion, and I say this because I know many people trapped in it, you know, it's a cult, it's just a completely adult fairy tale, but they believed it. And so now that he's coming out and saying, oh, it was a hoax, you know, Epstein is a hoax, it flies completely in the face of the cult. So now we've got a really big problem. And I don't know why he didn't put it back in the box. I don't know why. "If the people who run the system want Trump out, they can use Epstein to do it. It will work, and they can get him out by the end of the year if they want."

Sense Receptor

218,555 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten