Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Edsger Dijkstra never owned a computer. He wrote every paper by fountain pen, in a script so precise that colleagues collected the pages, and he numbered them EWD for 40 years. He walked into a Northwestern lecture hall and argued that programming is a branch of mathematics, not a...

igasparens's profile picture

Gaspar

1,271 subscribers

99,205 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The cold is British. They just never told you. ❄️🇬🇧 Every air conditioner, every fridge, every freezer on earth, the cold inside all of it was first made by a Scotsman. In 1756. ❄️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 His name was William Cullen, a doctor in Edinburgh. In a warm room, with no ice and no winter, he drew the air from a glass of ether until it boiled cold and drank the heat from the water around it, until the water froze. No one had ever done it before. Then he wrote it down and walked away. No machine, no patent, no fortune. Just the proof, on a bench. It sat there the better part of a century. A British bench built the first machine that worked, and a Scot carried it across the world to Australia, where it froze meat and cooled beer. But cold was only half the story. ❄️📖 To master the air itself took another Scot. When the Houses of Parliament burned down in 1834, David Boswell Reid made the new building breathe, its gothic spires its lungs. At St George's Hall in Liverpool in 1851 he built what is often called the first air-conditioned building on earth. It should have made him. He died forgotten in America instead. 40 years on, Willis Carrier built the machine and earned his name as the father of modern air conditioning. He earned every bit of it. But he did not make the cold. The cold was British. America took that inheritance and cooled the world with it, and that is no theft. That is what an inheritance is for. We are the home of British heroes. Not built by ads, not by the government, built by us. There's a place for you with us. Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
4:44

The cold is British. They just never told you. ❄️🇬🇧 Every air conditioner, every fridge, every freezer on earth, the cold inside all of it was first made by a Scotsman. In 1756. ❄️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 His name was William Cullen, a doctor in Edinburgh. In a warm room, with no ice and no winter, he drew the air from a glass of ether until it boiled cold and drank the heat from the water around it, until the water froze. No one had ever done it before. Then he wrote it down and walked away. No machine, no patent, no fortune. Just the proof, on a bench. It sat there the better part of a century. A British bench built the first machine that worked, and a Scot carried it across the world to Australia, where it froze meat and cooled beer. But cold was only half the story. ❄️📖 To master the air itself took another Scot. When the Houses of Parliament burned down in 1834, David Boswell Reid made the new building breathe, its gothic spires its lungs. At St George's Hall in Liverpool in 1851 he built what is often called the first air-conditioned building on earth. It should have made him. He died forgotten in America instead. 40 years on, Willis Carrier built the machine and earned his name as the father of modern air conditioning. He earned every bit of it. But he did not make the cold. The cold was British. America took that inheritance and cooled the world with it, and that is no theft. That is what an inheritance is for. We are the home of British heroes. Not built by ads, not by the government, built by us. There's a place for you with us. Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

56,349 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Beethoven could not hear the music he wrote. At the age of 28, he realized he was no longer able to listen to a flute being played in the distance, and he spent the rest of his life composing the most enduring music in Western history in almost complete silence... He had been a working musician since childhood. His ears were everything. In 1798, in the middle of a heated argument with a singer, he noticed for the first time that something was wrong. The sound was thinning at the edges. He could hear voices, but high frequencies were beginning to disappear. He told no one for years. By 1802, the truth was no longer deniable. On his doctor's advice he moved to Heiligenstadt, a quiet village outside Vienna, hoping the country air would help. It did not. There, alone and surrounded by farmland, he wrote a letter to his two brothers that he never sent. It was found among his papers after his death. We now call it the Heiligenstadt Testament, and it is one of the most devastating documents ever written by an artist about himself: "You men who think or say that I am malevolent, stubborn or misanthropic, how greatly do you wrong me. You do not know the cause of my seeming so... what a humiliation, when one stood beside me and heard a flute in the distance and I heard nothing, or someone heard the shepherd singing, and again I heard nothing." He wrote, in the same letter, that he had thought of ending his life. And then he wrote the line that explains everything that followed: "Only my art held me back. It seemed impossible to me to leave the world before I had produced everything I felt called upon to produce." He went back to Vienna. He went on composing. Over the next two decades his hearing continued to fade. Friends began writing their words down in small notebooks instead of speaking them aloud, and waiting while he read. Modern scholars call these the conversation books. Around four hundred of them survive. To compose, he developed his own methods. He bit one end of a wooden rod and pressed the other against the soundboard of his piano, letting the vibrations travel through his jaw to his inner ear. He had stumbled, through trial and error, onto the principle that modern science calls bone conduction. The cause of his deafness has never been settled. What we do know is this: he realized he was losing his hearing at twenty-eight, and he could have stopped. He wrote the letter, he held the thought of dying in his hand, and then he put down the pen and went back to work. Most of what he is remembered for was composed after that moment: The Fifth Symphony. The Seventh. The Ninth. The Missa Solemnis. The late quartets. All of it was made by a man who could no longer hear most of what he was writing. There are people who give the world what they receive, and there are people who give the world what they were never able to receive. The most enduring beauty in human history has almost always come from the second kind... -- -- -- If you enjoyed this, I write a weekly newsletter read by over 50,000 people who love rediscovering the beauty of the past. You can join us here: I write about beauty in all its forms. If you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible.
0:35

Beethoven could not hear the music he wrote. At the age of 28, he realized he was no longer able to listen to a flute being played in the distance, and he spent the rest of his life composing the most enduring music in Western history in almost complete silence... He had been a working musician since childhood. His ears were everything. In 1798, in the middle of a heated argument with a singer, he noticed for the first time that something was wrong. The sound was thinning at the edges. He could hear voices, but high frequencies were beginning to disappear. He told no one for years. By 1802, the truth was no longer deniable. On his doctor's advice he moved to Heiligenstadt, a quiet village outside Vienna, hoping the country air would help. It did not. There, alone and surrounded by farmland, he wrote a letter to his two brothers that he never sent. It was found among his papers after his death. We now call it the Heiligenstadt Testament, and it is one of the most devastating documents ever written by an artist about himself: "You men who think or say that I am malevolent, stubborn or misanthropic, how greatly do you wrong me. You do not know the cause of my seeming so... what a humiliation, when one stood beside me and heard a flute in the distance and I heard nothing, or someone heard the shepherd singing, and again I heard nothing." He wrote, in the same letter, that he had thought of ending his life. And then he wrote the line that explains everything that followed: "Only my art held me back. It seemed impossible to me to leave the world before I had produced everything I felt called upon to produce." He went back to Vienna. He went on composing. Over the next two decades his hearing continued to fade. Friends began writing their words down in small notebooks instead of speaking them aloud, and waiting while he read. Modern scholars call these the conversation books. Around four hundred of them survive. To compose, he developed his own methods. He bit one end of a wooden rod and pressed the other against the soundboard of his piano, letting the vibrations travel through his jaw to his inner ear. He had stumbled, through trial and error, onto the principle that modern science calls bone conduction. The cause of his deafness has never been settled. What we do know is this: he realized he was losing his hearing at twenty-eight, and he could have stopped. He wrote the letter, he held the thought of dying in his hand, and then he put down the pen and went back to work. Most of what he is remembered for was composed after that moment: The Fifth Symphony. The Seventh. The Ninth. The Missa Solemnis. The late quartets. All of it was made by a man who could no longer hear most of what he was writing. There are people who give the world what they receive, and there are people who give the world what they were never able to receive. The most enduring beauty in human history has almost always come from the second kind... -- -- -- If you enjoyed this, I write a weekly newsletter read by over 50,000 people who love rediscovering the beauty of the past. You can join us here: I write about beauty in all its forms. If you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible.

James Lucas

155,191 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.
3:01

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

James Lucas

94,697 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

THIS IS ANDREJ KARPATHY'S OBSIDIAN VAULT : THE BRAIN ANTHROPIC JUST HIRED FOR MILLIONS This is every idea, every decision and every connection he's made over years of work, visualized in real time. Everything else gets lost. The pattern you noticed last March. The connection between two problems you solved a year apart. The idea that would've changed everything if you'd remembered it in the room. This system keeps all of it. Every note links to another. Every link becomes a path. Every path is a decision he can retrace in seconds while everyone else starts from zero. Thousands of nodes. Hundreds of live connections. Years of thinking that never decayed, never died in a Slack thread, never got buried in a meeting nobody remembers. The breakthroughs aren't luck. They're the system handing him back a link he made eighteen months ago and forgot he had. No team. No wiki. No standups. One person and a tool that remembers everything he can't. Most people open Obsidian and make three notes they never open again. He built an operating system for his own thinking. Anthropic just paid millions for the output - this is the machine that produced it.
22:22

THIS IS ANDREJ KARPATHY'S OBSIDIAN VAULT : THE BRAIN ANTHROPIC JUST HIRED FOR MILLIONS This is every idea, every decision and every connection he's made over years of work, visualized in real time. Everything else gets lost. The pattern you noticed last March. The connection between two problems you solved a year apart. The idea that would've changed everything if you'd remembered it in the room. This system keeps all of it. Every note links to another. Every link becomes a path. Every path is a decision he can retrace in seconds while everyone else starts from zero. Thousands of nodes. Hundreds of live connections. Years of thinking that never decayed, never died in a Slack thread, never got buried in a meeting nobody remembers. The breakthroughs aren't luck. They're the system handing him back a link he made eighteen months ago and forgot he had. No team. No wiki. No standups. One person and a tool that remembers everything he can't. Most people open Obsidian and make three notes they never open again. He built an operating system for his own thinking. Anthropic just paid millions for the output - this is the machine that produced it.

Avid

65,533 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

A STANFORD 26-YEAR-OLD BUILT A NEURAL NET OUT OF 11,400 NOTES AND IT CAUGHT HIM CONTRADICTING HIMSELF 2 YEARS APART He didn’t set out to build a brain, he set out to stop losing things. 2 years in the vault held 11,400 notes and 412,000 links, and when he pointed a local model at the link graph and asked it a question he already knew the answer to, it gave him a different one. Then it showed the path 6 notes written across 2 years, ending in a claim he made in 2024 and quietly abandoned in 2026 without ever noticing he’d changed his mind. He sat there for 40 minutes. The thing about a wired vault is that it doesn’t forget the version of you that wrote the note, because every link is a decision you made once and never revisited, and 412,000 of them start holding positions you no longer hold. He ran it against 30 of his strongest opinions. 11 contradicted something he’d written before, 4 contradicted something he’d written that same year. The red bloom in the graph isn’t decoration every strand is a thought he had once and tied to 2 others, and the bright core is where his thinking loops back on itself hardest. Most people build a second brain to remember more. His started arguing with him. He wanted a filing cabinet, he got a witness.
0:34

A STANFORD 26-YEAR-OLD BUILT A NEURAL NET OUT OF 11,400 NOTES AND IT CAUGHT HIM CONTRADICTING HIMSELF 2 YEARS APART He didn’t set out to build a brain, he set out to stop losing things. 2 years in the vault held 11,400 notes and 412,000 links, and when he pointed a local model at the link graph and asked it a question he already knew the answer to, it gave him a different one. Then it showed the path 6 notes written across 2 years, ending in a claim he made in 2024 and quietly abandoned in 2026 without ever noticing he’d changed his mind. He sat there for 40 minutes. The thing about a wired vault is that it doesn’t forget the version of you that wrote the note, because every link is a decision you made once and never revisited, and 412,000 of them start holding positions you no longer hold. He ran it against 30 of his strongest opinions. 11 contradicted something he’d written before, 4 contradicted something he’d written that same year. The red bloom in the graph isn’t decoration every strand is a thought he had once and tied to 2 others, and the bright core is where his thinking loops back on itself hardest. Most people build a second brain to remember more. His started arguing with him. He wanted a filing cabinet, he got a witness.

West Lord

166,711 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Ryan Coogler saying that he made the best film he was capable of at that moment in his life is such a powerful answer. It acknowledges that art is inseparable from where a person is emotionally, mentally, and creatively. He was not claiming perfection, he was claiming integrity. He gave everything he had in that season of his life, every ounce of heart, discipline, and imagination, and that is all any true artist can ever offer. That response shows not only humility but a deep respect for the creative process, because it recognizes that growth never stops, yet every chapter deserves to be made with full intention and honesty.
1:05

Ryan Coogler saying that he made the best film he was capable of at that moment in his life is such a powerful answer. It acknowledges that art is inseparable from where a person is emotionally, mentally, and creatively. He was not claiming perfection, he was claiming integrity. He gave everything he had in that season of his life, every ounce of heart, discipline, and imagination, and that is all any true artist can ever offer. That response shows not only humility but a deep respect for the creative process, because it recognizes that growth never stops, yet every chapter deserves to be made with full intention and honesty.

J Michelle Michelle

12,676 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

JOE ROGAN: GOOGLE’S AI SOLVED AN IMPOSSIBLE EQUATION IN MINUTES Joe said Google’s AI achieved a staggering breakthrough by solving a problem that would take the world’s supercomputers billions of years. He said the calculation was so complex that even turning every atom in the universe into a computer wouldn’t have done it in time: “I believe it’s the Google one. They solved an equation that would take the world’s supercomputers, I think it was 2.6 billion years to solve, and it solved it in a matter of minutes. The only way for it to solve this problem, Marc Andreessen said it on my podcast, the equation is so difficult that if you took every atom in the universe and converted it to a supercomputer, the universe would die of heat death before it would solve this equation. And it solved it in minutes.” Source: Joe Rogan Jesse Michels
4:06

JOE ROGAN: GOOGLE’S AI SOLVED AN IMPOSSIBLE EQUATION IN MINUTES Joe said Google’s AI achieved a staggering breakthrough by solving a problem that would take the world’s supercomputers billions of years. He said the calculation was so complex that even turning every atom in the universe into a computer wouldn’t have done it in time: “I believe it’s the Google one. They solved an equation that would take the world’s supercomputers, I think it was 2.6 billion years to solve, and it solved it in a matter of minutes. The only way for it to solve this problem, Marc Andreessen said it on my podcast, the equation is so difficult that if you took every atom in the universe and converted it to a supercomputer, the universe would die of heat death before it would solve this equation. And it solved it in minutes.” Source: Joe Rogan Jesse Michels

Mario Nawfal

861,771 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.
12:36

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Warren McCulloch modeled the first neural net in 1943 and asked only 1 question his whole life. He was 19 in 1917, raised for the Episcopal ministry, soaked in theology, until mathematics seduced him. His defense was that the ideas in the mind of God are logic. The question never changed. What is a number that a man may know it, and a man that he may know a number. He cracked the first half and admitted on camera the second half never came. So he settled for a frog, opened its eye at MIT and asked what it tells a frog’s brain. He said your brain is not a sequential machine and not a parallel one either. It is the mouth of the Nile, every stream mixed with every other stream before the water reaches the sea. Anastomotic, the old Greek word, the only one he had for it. Then he said the part nobody quotes. You run well to 16, and after that thousands of neurons die per day. He guessed 10% of the big cells in his own cerebellum were already holes filled with glia. He built the theory to survive that, a cell dying, firing pip pip pip, quitting, the system holding. His family still reaches 100. The interviewer pushed and said a machine will never love your 2 grandchildren the way you do. McCulloch answered that if he could do it, a mechanism could do it. Man won’t survive forever, he said, the sun makes that improbable, something else comes. The machines would be standing on our shoulders. He said it beside a lake he built himself 30 years earlier by damming a stream. His last words on the tape were don’t shake the table.
9:33

Warren McCulloch modeled the first neural net in 1943 and asked only 1 question his whole life. He was 19 in 1917, raised for the Episcopal ministry, soaked in theology, until mathematics seduced him. His defense was that the ideas in the mind of God are logic. The question never changed. What is a number that a man may know it, and a man that he may know a number. He cracked the first half and admitted on camera the second half never came. So he settled for a frog, opened its eye at MIT and asked what it tells a frog’s brain. He said your brain is not a sequential machine and not a parallel one either. It is the mouth of the Nile, every stream mixed with every other stream before the water reaches the sea. Anastomotic, the old Greek word, the only one he had for it. Then he said the part nobody quotes. You run well to 16, and after that thousands of neurons die per day. He guessed 10% of the big cells in his own cerebellum were already holes filled with glia. He built the theory to survive that, a cell dying, firing pip pip pip, quitting, the system holding. His family still reaches 100. The interviewer pushed and said a machine will never love your 2 grandchildren the way you do. McCulloch answered that if he could do it, a mechanism could do it. Man won’t survive forever, he said, the sun makes that improbable, something else comes. The machines would be standing on our shoulders. He said it beside a lake he built himself 30 years earlier by damming a stream. His last words on the tape were don’t shake the table.

West Lord

79,616 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Andrew Wiles worked on Fermat's Last Theorem alone in his attic for 7 years and told nobody except his wife. The problem was 358 years old. Fermat scribbled in a margin in 1637 that he had a proof and no room to write it, and every mathematician since had failed. Wiles saw the statement in a library book at 10 years old. He never let it go. He was a Princeton professor when he started in 1986. He stopped publishing new work and released old results in pieces to hide the silence. He announced it in Cambridge in June 1993, over 3 lectures, revealing the target only at the end. Newspapers ran it worldwide. Then a referee found a gap. One step in the proof did not hold, and the error was fundamental. He spent 14 months trying to close it in public view, with the whole field watching. He was ready to quit. The fix arrived in September 1994. He has said he stared at it in disbelief for 20 minutes. The BBC filmed him describing that moment. He gets a few words out, then turns away from the camera in tears. He kept the greatest result of the century secret so nobody could take it.
51:20

Andrew Wiles worked on Fermat's Last Theorem alone in his attic for 7 years and told nobody except his wife. The problem was 358 years old. Fermat scribbled in a margin in 1637 that he had a proof and no room to write it, and every mathematician since had failed. Wiles saw the statement in a library book at 10 years old. He never let it go. He was a Princeton professor when he started in 1986. He stopped publishing new work and released old results in pieces to hide the silence. He announced it in Cambridge in June 1993, over 3 lectures, revealing the target only at the end. Newspapers ran it worldwide. Then a referee found a gap. One step in the proof did not hold, and the error was fundamental. He spent 14 months trying to close it in public view, with the whole field watching. He was ready to quit. The fix arrived in September 1994. He has said he stared at it in disbelief for 20 minutes. The BBC filmed him describing that moment. He gets a few words out, then turns away from the camera in tears. He kept the greatest result of the century secret so nobody could take it.

Gaspar

1,434,268 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Thank you, Will Cain, for being unequivocal in talking about the shooter as having been transgender and their vile views: “Based on court documents, the shooter was transgender and ‘identifies as a female and wanted her name to reflect that identification.’ It was his mother who signed off on that court document for a change and name...He was almost apologetic to his family, but hateful to the world..He displayed a shotgun, an automatic rifle, several pistols, along with loads of ammunition and magazines, clips, also side arm holders. And he wrote on all of them with what appears to be a white sharpie or white marker, he wrote things like ‘kill Donald Trump.’ He wrote ‘for the children,’ ‘killer sadist,’ ‘sponsored by BlackRock.’ He also had a smoke canister, Buck, where he wrote ‘Jew gas.’ He also wrote, on a separate material, wrote ‘6 million is not enough.’ Hateful messages. Really honestly, Buck, across the board written on these things most in English, some by the way, in cyrillic, and he narrates it almost like the Joker and Batman and other times like he is a Gollum from ‘Lord of the Rings.’ It’s very disturbing.”
3:52

Thank you, Will Cain, for being unequivocal in talking about the shooter as having been transgender and their vile views: “Based on court documents, the shooter was transgender and ‘identifies as a female and wanted her name to reflect that identification.’ It was his mother who signed off on that court document for a change and name...He was almost apologetic to his family, but hateful to the world..He displayed a shotgun, an automatic rifle, several pistols, along with loads of ammunition and magazines, clips, also side arm holders. And he wrote on all of them with what appears to be a white sharpie or white marker, he wrote things like ‘kill Donald Trump.’ He wrote ‘for the children,’ ‘killer sadist,’ ‘sponsored by BlackRock.’ He also had a smoke canister, Buck, where he wrote ‘Jew gas.’ He also wrote, on a separate material, wrote ‘6 million is not enough.’ Hateful messages. Really honestly, Buck, across the board written on these things most in English, some by the way, in cyrillic, and he narrates it almost like the Joker and Batman and other times like he is a Gollum from ‘Lord of the Rings.’ It’s very disturbing.”

Curtis Houck

58,536 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

YoungK shared that when he was little, he wrote a letter to the sky asking how he could become all the things he dreamed of. his mom told him to ask the sky. later, he found a reply on the back of the letter saying he could become anything if he believed in himself🥹 he’s pretty sure his dad wrote it, but his parents never admitted it (the caption: parents’ cute secret of wanting to protect their child’s innocence​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​)🥹 to. Younghyun whatever you want to become you can become anything believe in yourself and keep moving forward from. the sky
0:53

YoungK shared that when he was little, he wrote a letter to the sky asking how he could become all the things he dreamed of. his mom told him to ask the sky. later, he found a reply on the back of the letter saying he could become anything if he believed in himself🥹 he’s pretty sure his dad wrote it, but his parents never admitted it (the caption: parents’ cute secret of wanting to protect their child’s innocence​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​)🥹 to. Younghyun whatever you want to become you can become anything believe in yourself and keep moving forward from. the sky

woodyꕤ 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐒𝐓 🗝️🚪

16,584 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Drew Starkey tells us that he was inspired by the occult for his performance in 'ONSLAUGHT': “We talked a lot about the occult, and I read a lot of books, a lot of Crowley books, that informed who he was and why he got in the position he was in.”
0:37

Drew Starkey tells us that he was inspired by the occult for his performance in 'ONSLAUGHT': “We talked a lot about the occult, and I read a lot of books, a lot of Crowley books, that informed who he was and why he got in the position he was in.”

Film Updates

58,340 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.
44:02

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.

Zyron

16,163 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

IN A 1997 KEYNOTE A DEVELOPER TOLD A ROOM FULL OF PROGRAMMERS THAT THE COMPUTER REVOLUTION HAD NOT ACTUALLY HAPPENED YET. THEN HE PLAYED A CLIP OF WINDOWS, ICONS AND LIVE EDITING RUNNING ON A MACHINE FROM 1973 AND THE ROOM WENT QUIET. 62 minutes from Alan Kay -- the man who invented the word "object-oriented" and helped build the first modern personal computer at Xerox PARC. -> The idea that lands: almost everything you call "computing" is just paper, digitized. Documents, mail, folders. We took the most powerful medium ever made and used it to imitate the office. The real machine -- the one that thinks with you, that you shape live instead of typing at -- was sketched in the 60s and 70s, then quietly abandoned. He calls modern software an Egyptian pyramid: millions of bricks stacked by brute force, no structure underneath. And now AI is quietly hauling us back toward what he wanted -- you describe intent, the machine builds the how. Not a revolution from nowhere. A return to a dream we walked away from. You thought this was the future. This is the talk that shows you it is a detour we have been on for 40 years. Save this. It reframes the whole industry ↓
1:02:53

IN A 1997 KEYNOTE A DEVELOPER TOLD A ROOM FULL OF PROGRAMMERS THAT THE COMPUTER REVOLUTION HAD NOT ACTUALLY HAPPENED YET. THEN HE PLAYED A CLIP OF WINDOWS, ICONS AND LIVE EDITING RUNNING ON A MACHINE FROM 1973 AND THE ROOM WENT QUIET. 62 minutes from Alan Kay -- the man who invented the word "object-oriented" and helped build the first modern personal computer at Xerox PARC. -> The idea that lands: almost everything you call "computing" is just paper, digitized. Documents, mail, folders. We took the most powerful medium ever made and used it to imitate the office. The real machine -- the one that thinks with you, that you shape live instead of typing at -- was sketched in the 60s and 70s, then quietly abandoned. He calls modern software an Egyptian pyramid: millions of bricks stacked by brute force, no structure underneath. And now AI is quietly hauling us back toward what he wanted -- you describe intent, the machine builds the how. Not a revolution from nowhere. A return to a dream we walked away from. You thought this was the future. This is the talk that shows you it is a detour we have been on for 40 years. Save this. It reframes the whole industry ↓

slash1s

294,844 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Cooper: The president seemed to indicate that he had not been briefed that Iran might strike out at its neighbors or try to shut down the strait of hormuz. Is that conceivable to you? Bolton: I know for a fact that he was aware of those potentials. I raised the option of regime change in Iran several times during the time I was national security advisor. I never persuaded the president to adopt that position. And one reason was that others had different views. And every time I raised it, they raised a whole long list of difficulties that are entailed by a regime change campaign and if you're going to embark on it, you better have answers to them. And certainly, closing the strait of hormuz was always one of them. And so were attacks on the gulf Arab states, particularly their oil infrastructure. So he knew about it in his first term. I find it hard to believe that he forgot about it in the intervening years.
1:12

Cooper: The president seemed to indicate that he had not been briefed that Iran might strike out at its neighbors or try to shut down the strait of hormuz. Is that conceivable to you? Bolton: I know for a fact that he was aware of those potentials. I raised the option of regime change in Iran several times during the time I was national security advisor. I never persuaded the president to adopt that position. And one reason was that others had different views. And every time I raised it, they raised a whole long list of difficulties that are entailed by a regime change campaign and if you're going to embark on it, you better have answers to them. And certainly, closing the strait of hormuz was always one of them. And so were attacks on the gulf Arab states, particularly their oil infrastructure. So he knew about it in his first term. I find it hard to believe that he forgot about it in the intervening years.

Acyn

321,977 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

“The Office” creator Greg Daniels reveals Steve Carell almost played his dad in a biopic Daniels wrote nearly 20 years ago: “He’s a very colorful person and he actually was in the Olympics in 1968, and I wrote a movie for Steve to play him, like on spec during the writers strike of 2008. He had a very rare sport. That’s how he was able to do it,” Daniels explained. “It was the demonstration sport of Mexico, basically like jai alai but with paddles and so he managed to wrangle his way in with some friends.” Hollywood Walk of Fame
0:42

“The Office” creator Greg Daniels reveals Steve Carell almost played his dad in a biopic Daniels wrote nearly 20 years ago: “He’s a very colorful person and he actually was in the Olympics in 1968, and I wrote a movie for Steve to play him, like on spec during the writers strike of 2008. He had a very rare sport. That’s how he was able to do it,” Daniels explained. “It was the demonstration sport of Mexico, basically like jai alai but with paddles and so he managed to wrangle his way in with some friends.” Hollywood Walk of Fame

Variety

19,832 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

At 28 mark pincus was nearly broke, had been fired by John Malone and Bain, and as he says "my life sucked so badly." He wanted a place to think and ended up in a synagogue. Sitting there something happened ... but it wasn't a religious experience. He started writing what he calls the book of life. He documented every single thing that sucked in his life (and it was a long list.) Then he wrote out a goal for the next year that taught he he was the master of his circumstances, not the other way around. And he's done this every year of his life since. The key question he's trying to answer each year is: "What would your future self thank you for doing this year?"
2:00

At 28 mark pincus was nearly broke, had been fired by John Malone and Bain, and as he says "my life sucked so badly." He wanted a place to think and ended up in a synagogue. Sitting there something happened ... but it wasn't a religious experience. He started writing what he calls the book of life. He documented every single thing that sucked in his life (and it was a long list.) Then he wrote out a goal for the next year that taught he he was the master of his circumstances, not the other way around. And he's done this every year of his life since. The key question he's trying to answer each year is: "What would your future self thank you for doing this year?"

Shane Parrish

69,403 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.
1:03:58

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

Veles

48,073 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce