正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

#EIGENSCAM Unfortunately, the Eigenlayer team has disappointed its users! What do you call using users' money to create your own protocol and then, after two years, not only neglecting them but also locking up the same amount of tokens they had! Shame!

22,430 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Satoru (꧁IP꧂) ♦️ (💙,🧡).fuel🛸.lens 的头像
Satoru (꧁IP꧂) ♦️ (💙,🧡).fuel🛸.lens2 年前

وای وای باورم نمیشه عاللللللللللییییییییی 🤣🤣🤣🤣 #EIGENSCAM

RziCrypto(✸,✸)🧸⛓️ 的头像
RziCrypto(✸,✸)🧸⛓️2 年前

#eigenscam really disappointed it's community 📉

0xHaM☰d 的头像
0xHaM☰d2 年前

#EIGENSCAM

Mono.lens 的头像
Mono.lens2 年前

#EIGENSCAM

MZ 的头像
MZ2 年前

#EIGENSCAM Scamlayer = eigenlayer

saeed.arya☰👑 的头像
saeed.arya☰👑2 年前

#EIGENSCAM big kiri proje

Mbrvyek 的头像
Mbrvyek2 年前

#EIGENSCAM 🤡 10 $eigen for you

Zoro 🕹️ $RCADE 的头像
Zoro 🕹️ $RCADE2 年前

#Eigenscam

sirwan 的头像
sirwan2 年前

#EIGENSCAM

相关视频

Rahul Vohra on how to measure product/market fit Rahul Vohra is the founder and CEO of Superhuman. He was looking for a metric to measure product/market fit so that he and his team could optimize, and he came across the following methodology from Sean Ellis: Simply ask your users: “How would you feel if you could no longer use the product?” with three options: (1) not disappointed, (2) somewhat disappointed, or (3) very disappointed. It turns out that the benchmark for product/market fit across hundreds of venture-backed startups is 40% of respondents saying “very disappointed”. And as Rahul puts it: “If more than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you should focus on growing your company. If less than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you’ll probably struggle to grow.” 40% may not sound like a lot, but it’s an incredibly hard benchmark to beat. For example, Slack posed this to 731 customers early in the company’s history, and 51% said they would be very disappointed without Slack. One might expect a terrific product like Slack to have a score of 60-80%, but that wasn’t the case. Rahul’s explanation of why the response options are focused on disappointment rather than happiness is interesting too: “I think the reason behind that is that if you ask people how they feel about a product and you give them positive potential responses, I think it invites more bias. People are more likely to be polite. And it also doesn’t get to the heart of the matter which is: how necessary has your product become in people’s lives? If you’re trying to build a company that’s going to stand the test of time, you really do have to build a product that matters and that people ultimately come to depend on because it’s just so incredible at what it does. And that’s what this question gets to the heart of.”

Michael McGuiness

67,106 次观看 • 2 年前