Einstein Bridge.

1 times 1 means you did one thing one time. if you plant one seed you get one plant. dude's retarded

“It's like when I'm right I'm right, when I'm wrong I could've been right, so I'm still right cause I could've been wrong”

Dont know what’s dumber, him for saying this or ppl who repost it like it’s deep.. they are both the same equation but one is one step ahead. 1.414….^3=2.827 1.414…. x 2=2.827 If you break up the first one, it’s the same as the second one: 1.414 x (1.414 x 1.414) =1.414 x 2

1 x 1 is read as 1 group of 1 item So 10 groups of 1 item is 10 items 6 groups of 2 items is 12 items 1 group of 1 item is 1 item Make sense?

I taught my young children to multiple by changing the word multiply to “sets of”. So 2x2 becomes 2 sets of 2. In this context, it’s one set of one. You’re overthinking.

Multiplication is grouping sets of numbers and counting how many individuals overall across the groups. 1 x 2 is two groups of one, which is a total of 2 1 x 0 is no groups of one, so the total is none Therefore, 1 group of 1 individual is a total of 1 Kind regards

As an electrical engineer with a solid understanding of these concepts, I can confirm that this video is ignorance masked as knowledge. Don’t shoot the messenger, I speak without ego

He should start the 1st standard book where the show 1 x 🍎= 🍎 2 x 🍎 = 🍎🍎 3 x 🍎 = 🍎🍎🍎

This is what these people do. They take terms and apply another interpretation of them and then try to apply it to another domain. Multiply in maths isn’t the same meaning as multiply in English

He's bullshiting hard. If I gave you 1 apple 1 time. How many apples you got.

This dumbass dude… bro if I give you 1 apple 1 time you have 1 apple. If I give you 2 apples 2 times you now have 4 apples.. dumbass

He’s genuinely lost the plot. And there’s people who agree with him, thinking he’s intelligent.

He’s using the literal linguistic definitions to try to justify his lack of practical understanding. Yes, multiply (definitionally) means “more of” but in practice 1x1 can only be 1. There is no deeper meaning, there is no grand conspiracy. This guy peddles pseudo-science

But why does 🍎*0 = 0? If I started off with one apple, how does multiplying it zero times equal zero apples? Shouldn’t I be left with the one I started out with? From a real life perspective, no magic tricks or black holes sucking the apple away lol.

If you do 1 thing 1 time it has 1 result boom argument dead….

He really right by the definition of multiplication 1×1 should be two if u multiply 1 cent you would have 2 cents same as addition 1+1 dosnt equal 1 it's 2 because it has to actually add

Multiplication means groups of. Groups of numbers multiply. 1 group of 1 is 1. 2 groups of 1 is two. Moron.

This dude lost his role as war machine and lost his mind.

Okay so it’s not a mathematical fallacy at all. It’s trick your brain doesn’t catch. They doing the same the multiple. You can do this with any number.

He’s happy man, he’s lost the simple meaning but he looks happy. Let ppl have their happiness lol

“Have you ever seen an action times an action without a reaction? No. Cause equanimity is the currency of the universe.” I don’t know what that is, but it ain’t reason.

Utter idiocy from this dude. As a person who's gone through and passed graduation level math in a bachelor's degree, I'm offended at how stupid this guy's arguments are. One times anything is the value of itself. This is truly 65 IQ logic to say that it somehow doesn't make sense

Terrence Howard is fucking retarded and so is anyone who buys into his bullshit. If you need to think of multiplication in less abstract terms, it's "how many of _ are there". So 1 x 1 would be you have one 1. 2 x 1 would be two 1s (or one 2, either way still 2). etc. etc. etc.

Makes no sense. 1x1=1 because the equation is telling you if you have a multiple of 1 of something then you only have that 1 thing. Hes trying to play off of the interpretation of the literal words to disprove mathematics.

In math Multiplication is just simplified addition. So instead of saying 5+5+5+5+5 you would say 5x5.

In math, the number 1 is known as the multiplicative identity. This means that when you multiply any number by 1, the value does not change. It is essentially saying, I have this amount, and I am keeping it exactly as it is once. What a joke

The most idiotic argument I’ve ever heard. 1x1 2x1 etc… They’re statement points setting the rules of multiplication . If 1x2 is 2 how can 1x1 be 2…..too?

This is why electing celebrities is the dumbest thing you can ever do

Terrance Howard is a fucking weirdo! This shit is stupid.

I use to struggle as a child with maths and algebra, always used my own workings got right answers but because i didn’t do teachers way they failed me called me dumb. I always feel a number or something is missing with maths. Its off. He is right!.

imagine thinking that all that dumb shit that goes around in your head that you chuckle to in your own head you actually thought was genius and started telling everybody else That’s all that’s happening here