Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Either they nerfed down Opus 5.5 already or Astra is simply better at 3d modelling. but given Opus 5.5 is the latest frontier, it’s hard to believe it can perform worse than Astra. so it’s most likely a nerf case.

Lxyv

3,580 subscribers

51,221 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Gaming Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Finally, Opus made me the perfect jelly - even better than Astra’s 🍉🤯 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra This time, I prefer Opus: the juicy color, glossy flesh, and especially how the slice stretches, folds, and jiggles when you let go. It genuinely looks like gummy candy I want to touch Astra’s version is nice too, but Opus gets my vote here Estimated API cost: Opus - $4.50 Astra - $2.05 More than twice the price. Do you think it’s worth it? 👀

Finally, Opus made me the perfect jelly - even better than Astra’s 🍉🤯 Claude Opus 5.5 vs ChatGPT-6 Astra This time, I prefer Opus: the juicy color, glossy flesh, and especially how the slice stretches, folds, and jiggles when you let go. It genuinely looks like gummy candy I want to touch Astra’s version is nice too, but Opus gets my vote here Estimated API cost: Opus - $4.50 Astra - $2.05 More than twice the price. Do you think it’s worth it? 👀

Vib3Coded

402,446 views • 2 days ago

Fusion is the most efficient frontier harness for GPT 6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1. You can also configure everything about it: • Base model: Fable, Astra, Sol, or Opus • Sidekick model: SWE (Free), Luna, Sol, GLM (Free) • Speed: Normal or Fast ⚡ • Reasoning level It retains Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra performance while reducing costs and is the first time a multi-model coding agent has been included on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index! Importantly: it's also fun to use :)

Fusion is the most efficient frontier harness for GPT 6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1. You can also configure everything about it: • Base model: Fable, Astra, Sol, or Opus • Sidekick model: SWE (Free), Luna, Sol, GLM (Free) • Speed: Normal or Fast ⚡ • Reasoning level It retains Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra performance while reducing costs and is the first time a multi-model coding agent has been included on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index! Importantly: it's also fun to use :)

nader dabit

805,187 views • 17 days ago

I just tried the new Gemini-4 Pro Preview and honestly, for 3D work it’s right up there with Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra, all in a single shot, I genuinely didn’t expect it to be this good, It only used around 10% of my weekly limit on the $20 plan, I’m going to make a comparison video against Opus 5.2 or Fable and Astra if I can, I still can’t believe it, From what I’ve tested so far, this is easily top 1 or 2 for the best one shot execution I’ve seen

I just tried the new Gemini-4 Pro Preview and honestly, for 3D work it’s right up there with Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra, all in a single shot, I genuinely didn’t expect it to be this good, It only used around 10% of my weekly limit on the $20 plan, I’m going to make a comparison video against Opus 5.2 or Fable and Astra if I can, I still can’t believe it, From what I’ve tested so far, this is easily top 1 or 2 for the best one shot execution I’ve seen

Iam_

27,952 views • 10 days ago

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?

GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs SOL Astra is a clear jump from SOL. It understands intent really well. These models are getting so powerful, it’s hard to pick a winner. Fable is great at realism, while Kimi K3 has improved a lot since launch. Which one do you like?

Bhavy☄️

42,313 views • 24 days ago

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

GMI Cloud

75,785 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

Dan Shipper

354,673 views • 4 months ago

Trump: Because the world is a bigger place than we are, believe it or not. It's hard to believe that. But they are. That we go down much more than they go up so we they don't go up as much as people woulda thought.

Trump: Because the world is a bigger place than we are, believe it or not. It's hard to believe that. But they are. That we go down much more than they go up so we they don't go up as much as people woulda thought.

Headquarters

93,156 views • 5 months ago

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3. I'm comparing these because the gap between US models and Chinese models is already getting small. If US AI labs slow down, they will be the ones most affected by it. > Astra did it in one shot 6m 20s and $8. > Kimi K3 got almost the same result, but I had to use 2 follow-up prompts. Total: 12 min and $6.35. The results are almost identical. If US labs slow down, China takes the AI race. They will ship Astra-level open-weight models. China is already good at this. Open weights become the default. That's a nightmare for US labs.

GPT-6 Astra vs Kimi K3. I'm comparing these because the gap between US models and Chinese models is already getting small. If US AI labs slow down, they will be the ones most affected by it. > Astra did it in one shot 6m 20s and $8. > Kimi K3 got almost the same result, but I had to use 2 follow-up prompts. Total: 12 min and $6.35. The results are almost identical. If US labs slow down, China takes the AI race. They will ship Astra-level open-weight models. China is already good at this. Open weights become the default. That's a nightmare for US labs.

Bhavy☄️

26,050 views • 15 days ago

Grok 4.5 is sitting at #2 on the FrontierSWE leaderboard. Above Claude Opus 4.8. Above GPT-5.5. So yes, the coding model conversation just got a little more crowded at the top. Strong performance is one thing. Doing it with serious speed, better token efficiency, and lower cost is where it gets annoying for everyone else. Builders love a smart model. SpaceXAI Grok X Freeze / Writer: Annette, Designer: Janné

Grok 4.5 is sitting at #2 on the FrontierSWE leaderboard. Above Claude Opus 4.8. Above GPT-5.5. So yes, the coding model conversation just got a little more crowded at the top. Strong performance is one thing. Doing it with serious speed, better token efficiency, and lower cost is where it gets annoying for everyone else. Builders love a smart model. SpaceXAI Grok X Freeze / Writer: Annette, Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

44,365 views • 2 months ago

PCB and enclosure both from GPT-6 Astra. Board arrived, case printed, assembled — powered on first try. Only miss: the 3D model’s power-switch cutout is wrong — button won’t press once it’s in the shell. Left it as-is for consistency. Switching with a screwdriver for now. Annoying, but it works. Photos + video below.

PCB and enclosure both from GPT-6 Astra. Board arrived, case printed, assembled — powered on first try. Only miss: the 3D model’s power-switch cutout is wrong — button won’t press once it’s in the shell. Left it as-is for consistency. Switching with a screwdriver for now. Annoying, but it works. Photos + video below.

Peter

13,278 views • 19 days ago

Opus 5.5 just filed a pull request that changes the streaming behavior in T3 code. It's so cool that I can send off a prompt with a vague idea of what I want, and the result is a ready-to-merge pull request with a video demo of the changes directly in the PR. The PRs I make with AI are significantly better than the ones I used to make by hand. The future is awesome.

Opus 5.5 just filed a pull request that changes the streaming behavior in T3 code. It's so cool that I can send off a prompt with a vague idea of what I want, and the result is a ready-to-merge pull request with a video demo of the changes directly in the PR. The PRs I make with AI are significantly better than the ones I used to make by hand. The future is awesome.

Theo - t3.gg

92,784 views • 4 days ago

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Matthew Berman

1,906,122 views • 25 days ago

It’s hard to believe but this is her today. She’s back running. There are some very good people in the world. What a life they have given her 🥰🙏 (6/6)

It’s hard to believe but this is her today. She’s back running. There are some very good people in the world. What a life they have given her 🥰🙏 (6/6)

Niall Harbison

94,329 views • 11 months ago

Okay GPT-6 Astra might actually be the most insane thing we've ever seen for 3D. It drives Blender by itself. It clicks the same buttons a real artist would. All it needs is a drawing or an image to start. From there it gives you thousands of fully editable detailed objects with geometry so clean it hurts. Anyone can build an entire 3D world just by talking now. What is happening.

Okay GPT-6 Astra might actually be the most insane thing we've ever seen for 3D. It drives Blender by itself. It clicks the same buttons a real artist would. All it needs is a drawing or an image to start. From there it gives you thousands of fully editable detailed objects with geometry so clean it hurts. Anyone can build an entire 3D world just by talking now. What is happening.

ImagineArt

21,481 views • 24 days ago

🐶 : P’Por is already a quiet person, but he’s straightforward. If he’s sulking, you’ll know, and it’s hard to tell from his reactions, so it’s better to look at what he says // Tee, maybe he’s sulking now 😭😭😭😭😭

🐶 : P’Por is already a quiet person, but he’s straightforward. If he’s sulking, you’ll know, and it’s hard to tell from his reactions, so it’s better to look at what he says // Tee, maybe he’s sulking now 😭😭😭😭😭

ѕ тα я я у ✨ ᶠᵉᵃᵗ ᴰᵂʸ

26,277 views • 6 months ago

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.

atomic.chat

2,842,287 views • 2 months ago

There is a growing new trend in Japan, it’s called Butsukari Otoko, it s type of physical assault towards women in crowded places like the street or train stop. Usually it’s men that do it but a growing number of women are now joining in the trend as well. The purpose is to perform Chikan which is deliberately ramming into a woman and making it look accidental. It’s supposedly used to relieve frustration or annoyance against cellphone users. When this happens it’s getting harder to press charges because they mean to make it look accidental so it’s hard to tell who is doing it deliberately and who is doing this intentionally, either way I feel children should be off limits, accidental or not, with this new trend should this be charged regardless of intent when kids are involved?

There is a growing new trend in Japan, it’s called Butsukari Otoko, it s type of physical assault towards women in crowded places like the street or train stop. Usually it’s men that do it but a growing number of women are now joining in the trend as well. The purpose is to perform Chikan which is deliberately ramming into a woman and making it look accidental. It’s supposedly used to relieve frustration or annoyance against cellphone users. When this happens it’s getting harder to press charges because they mean to make it look accidental so it’s hard to tell who is doing it deliberately and who is doing this intentionally, either way I feel children should be off limits, accidental or not, with this new trend should this be charged regardless of intent when kids are involved?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,450,626 views • 7 months ago

Cyberbeast whistling noise when above 85 mph. How do you fix this? Service Center is telling me they can’t drive it above that speed so it’s hard to demonstrate. Sounds like it’s coming from either the roof glass or the front windshield. Cybertruck

Cyberbeast whistling noise when above 85 mph. How do you fix this? Service Center is telling me they can’t drive it above that speed so it’s hard to demonstrate. Sounds like it’s coming from either the roof glass or the front windshield. Cybertruck

SurfRanch Vibes 🇳🇴 🇺🇸

30,532 views • 7 months ago

everyone's sharing motion graphic videos that Opus 5.5 made, and it's genuinely insane everyone says they created it with "one prompt", but my one prompt video looked mid so i went through a bunch of these videos to see how they were actually made, and found the workflow that works here's how to generate pro level motion graphic videos w/ opus: 1. get reference videos to direct from -> pick 1-2 videos whose style you want and tell opus to match them. naming a style works way better than describing one without a reference, opus falls back to its default look: centered text, gradient background, everything fading in that's why so many of these videos look the same. a reference gives it the pacing, the type and the transitions to copy 2. install HyperFrames or Remotion so opus can build the video both let opus write every scene as code and render it straight to mp4. no video editor without one, opus can only describe a video or hand you a rough html page you have to screen record with it, every frame is exact, and when you ask for a change it edits one line and re-renders instead of starting over 3. install 21st for high quality components in the video real buttons, cards and UI components made by design engineers, instead of whatever opus invents on the spot without it, opus draws your product UI from scratch and it looks off. wrong spacing, placeholder boxes, fake-looking buttons anyone who's used good software can feel it in a second, and the whole video reads as cheap 4. steps 1-3 were context + setup. now dump all of it into opus your brand (logo, colors, fonts), screenshots of your real product, the reference video, and a quick braindump of how you see the video then ask for 3 storyboard variants without this, opus guesses your colors, your font and what your product even does. the video could be for any startup with it, it could only be yours. and 3 variants means you pick a direction instead of fixing the first idea it had 5. pick the storyboard you like ask for one still frame per scene before anything moves. fixing a storyboard is way cheaper than fixing a render without this step, you only find out scene 4 is wrong after the whole thing is animated, and every fix means re-rendering. a still frame takes seconds to change 6. let claude cook then give notes like a director: "slow every zoom to 0.7x", "hard cut here", "push in on the button" without notes, the first render is usually 80% there, and that last 20% is what makes it look pro. vague notes like "make it better" get random changes. camera words get exactly the change you want everyone has the same model. the context you give it is what makes it look pro let it cooookk

Rexan Wong

592,712 views • 2 days ago

This workflow is more interesting than simply “AI + Blender.” GPT-6 Astra produces the geometry → Blender constructs the composition → Dreamina’s Clay Renderer Plugin imports the clay model with one click → Seedance 2.5 renders it into the final output. The camera and layout stay unchanged during the transfer, so the original 3D setup is preserved. Plus, with competitive pricing for Seedance 2.5 and 2.0, you can explore additional looks without adding unnecessary cost. Turns out GPT-6 Astra + Dreamina Seedance 2.5 is an actual pipeline. Worth a test. #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner

This workflow is more interesting than simply “AI + Blender.” GPT-6 Astra produces the geometry → Blender constructs the composition → Dreamina’s Clay Renderer Plugin imports the clay model with one click → Seedance 2.5 renders it into the final output. The camera and layout stay unchanged during the transfer, so the original 3D setup is preserved. Plus, with competitive pricing for Seedance 2.5 and 2.0, you can explore additional looks without adding unnecessary cost. Turns out GPT-6 Astra + Dreamina Seedance 2.5 is an actual pipeline. Worth a test. #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner

Zara Khan

26,352 views • 17 days ago